1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:05,300
Mr. Arnold, I must apologize. Apologize for what? Two things. First, last week, I used the wrong

2
00:00:05,300 --> 00:00:10,460
mic. I was speaking through my MacBook Pro. Audio still came through, but not as good as the shore

3
00:00:10,460 --> 00:00:14,840
mic that you're hearing me through now. Second thing is, you're catching summer, Marty. I'm at

4
00:00:14,840 --> 00:00:21,140
the beach on the weekends. I wake up early, drive back to my desk by 9 a.m. Monday morning. I got

5
00:00:21,140 --> 00:00:26,980
a little, haven't shaved yet. Got a little like beach flow here, still rocking. Got the hat on,

6
00:00:26,980 --> 00:00:33,880
So sorry, I'm not as buttoned up as I should be for the quality of the show and the analysis that we just you just got that European vibe.

7
00:00:34,060 --> 00:00:39,660
You know, hit that hit that out of office automated message starting right after Memorial Day.

8
00:00:40,000 --> 00:00:40,900
Come back September.

9
00:00:41,080 --> 00:00:41,560
That's all right.

10
00:00:41,900 --> 00:00:42,360
No, no, no.

11
00:00:42,360 --> 00:00:43,040
We're still grinding.

12
00:00:43,260 --> 00:00:44,640
Drop in for a few podcasts.

13
00:00:44,700 --> 00:00:45,100
That's all right.

14
00:00:45,400 --> 00:00:49,600
We get 48 hours of rest on the weekend here in the United States.

15
00:00:49,600 --> 00:00:53,440
And even then, you're still talking to your client around the beach like, hey, I got this idea for Monday.

16
00:00:53,460 --> 00:00:54,800
But you get back to work on Monday.

17
00:00:54,800 --> 00:00:59,700
The summer doldrums don't exist when we have the world unfolding as it is right now.

18
00:01:00,080 --> 00:01:03,460
Yeah, definitely no summer doldrums over in the Middle East right now.

19
00:01:03,900 --> 00:01:04,860
No, well, that's what I was going to say.

20
00:01:04,920 --> 00:01:08,520
I have to apologize for a third thing, and that's to our audience, because we said we

21
00:01:08,520 --> 00:01:11,080
weren't going to be hermuse-maxing much more.

22
00:01:11,260 --> 00:01:16,720
But of course, as is par for the course with this incursion into the Middle East, the latest

23
00:01:16,720 --> 00:01:20,260
incursion from the United States, it's never ending, it seems.

24
00:01:20,260 --> 00:01:28,360
And as we've said many times over the last couple of months, the incentives for both sides are to keep this going as long as possible.

25
00:01:28,520 --> 00:01:36,600
We have the latest escalation, which is back and forth attacks from Iran and the United States.

26
00:01:36,880 --> 00:01:39,080
Iran attacked three ships in 24 hours.

27
00:01:39,600 --> 00:01:45,640
Trump officially ended the memorandum of understanding for the ceasefires, calling the Iranian leaders scum.

28
00:01:45,640 --> 00:01:52,660
and Iran has expanded attacks on Gulf states after the U.S. struck Iranian Iranian assets

29
00:01:52,660 --> 00:01:56,300
in retaliation for the ship attacks. What's your take on this, brother?

30
00:01:56,920 --> 00:02:01,560
Yeah. I mean, look, guys, you know, don't don't blame me. Don't blame us. We were on the horn

31
00:02:01,560 --> 00:02:05,600
with the Ayatollah last week saying, don't do this. We don't want to talk about it on the pod

32
00:02:05,600 --> 00:02:11,480
anymore. Please don't do this. You know, to no avail. So so here we are again when the this the

33
00:02:11,480 --> 00:02:18,800
story that seems to never end. And yeah, I think it's interesting to consider if what the incentives

34
00:02:18,800 --> 00:02:25,560
actually are for this to continue kind of on both sides. Certainly there's a hardline faction

35
00:02:25,560 --> 00:02:30,860
in Iran, which we wrote about a little bit in the timestamp over the weekend, that's getting a little

36
00:02:30,860 --> 00:02:35,360
more attention. There's an IRGC group that clearly just isn't interested in any kind of deal at all.

37
00:02:35,760 --> 00:02:39,300
And there's clear internal division there, which is now, I think, becoming more of a mainstream

38
00:02:39,300 --> 00:02:45,180
viewpoint. And it was a little more the provenance of tinfoil hats a few months ago, but it's

39
00:02:45,180 --> 00:02:49,880
becoming a little more clear. So there's definitely an incentive to just cause as much kind of chaos

40
00:02:49,880 --> 00:02:54,940
as possible and prevent a deal from happening in general, kind of the one major leverage point that

41
00:02:54,940 --> 00:02:59,680
the country has left that and arguably the nuclear program. And on the U.S. side, we've talked,

42
00:02:59,880 --> 00:03:05,860
we've documented extensively on the show, maybe some of the downstream benefits to the U.S.

43
00:03:05,860 --> 00:03:11,500
strategic position that have come out of this just this morning. It's not on the slide here,

44
00:03:11,620 --> 00:03:18,680
but Trump mentioned, I believe, on CNBC or maybe Fox Business that the U.S. is happy to be the

45
00:03:18,680 --> 00:03:24,340
guardian of the strait, and we should be compensated for that appropriately. So it's a

46
00:03:24,340 --> 00:03:30,280
little potentially groundwork laying there for where things may be moving. But in any case,

47
00:03:30,280 --> 00:03:39,380
This is it. We're back in a spot where there's no clear off ramp until one side or the other decides to to blink.

48
00:03:39,860 --> 00:03:43,140
And, you know, maybe midterms will be the forcing function for that.

49
00:03:43,240 --> 00:03:51,700
Maybe the the Iranian oil situation, which, you know, the country was already having trouble moving a huge amount of its backlogged oil to anyone.

50
00:03:51,880 --> 00:03:58,920
And now that's not going to be any easier. So, I mean, we'll see if that causes enough pressure to cause a relief valve here in the next few weeks.

51
00:03:58,920 --> 00:04:01,900
But yeah, we're back at it again, unfortunately.

52
00:04:02,560 --> 00:04:04,600
Yeah, that means that rates are reacting.

53
00:04:04,820 --> 00:04:09,660
We have the 10-year jumping up last week above 4.55.

54
00:04:10,280 --> 00:04:14,780
Currently, I guess at the time of the screenshot was at 4.561.

55
00:04:15,380 --> 00:04:22,900
Markets not as calm as they were when the medium, or excuse me, the memorandum of understanding was in place.

56
00:04:22,900 --> 00:04:32,620
And I think that's one thing to keep watching here is what are rates doing in reaction to these developments in the Middle East and across markets.

57
00:04:32,620 --> 00:04:33,900
Obviously, we have it on the list, too.

58
00:04:33,960 --> 00:04:39,440
We'll get to Japan, but I think a lot of people are focused on the Japanese government bond markets as well.

59
00:04:39,680 --> 00:04:46,980
And you have this backdrop of war in the Middle East, this reindustrialization here in the United States.

60
00:04:46,980 --> 00:04:54,460
Obviously, the AI wave still pressing forward, new models, new frontier models being released that are extremely impressive.

61
00:04:54,900 --> 00:05:06,160
But then you have this backdrop of the United States debt situation and are tethering to these bond yields that I think everybody's keeping an eye on.

62
00:05:06,900 --> 00:05:12,240
And when they get to these levels, this is when you begin to see things happening from the Trump administration.

63
00:05:12,880 --> 00:05:13,760
Yeah, for sure.

64
00:05:13,760 --> 00:05:23,660
I think an interesting point or kind of wrinkle on this is that this is the leader, the leading image, the header image for the newsletter this week.

65
00:05:23,860 --> 00:05:28,880
And I just thought it's kind of interesting that you have seen this is the 10 year and blue.

66
00:05:29,020 --> 00:05:33,780
So the 10 year move back up on kind of this news and it's over four, six this morning.

67
00:05:34,260 --> 00:05:40,380
So it's gone up even more. But the flip side is, you know, you're seeing in the oil market this morning.

68
00:05:40,380 --> 00:05:45,620
I think we're back above 75 again when these headlines started to hit kind of early last week.

69
00:05:46,020 --> 00:05:51,500
We went from high 60 to 75, but then kind of fell back, at least on WTI.

70
00:05:52,000 --> 00:05:53,360
I think Brent had a similar kind of move.

71
00:05:53,780 --> 00:05:55,400
Fell back to roughly pre-war levels.

72
00:05:55,500 --> 00:05:57,500
Now we're kind of back in that mid-70s range again.

73
00:05:58,060 --> 00:05:59,440
We'll see how it continues to move.

74
00:05:59,840 --> 00:06:07,620
But in the energy markets, at least in the oil market, you weren't seeing kind of an immediate kind of gap up back to where we were a few months ago.

75
00:06:07,620 --> 00:06:26,040
And you saw also kind of an interesting version of that or something along the same theme with move index, which is what you have here in orange, as rates have gone back to kind of what has historically been over the last few years, an informal kind of line in the sand for the 10 years.

76
00:06:26,040 --> 00:06:31,600
So the four or five, four, six level where it seems like generally the, the, the fed and the

77
00:06:31,600 --> 00:06:37,020
treasury get, get kind of queasy bank system gets a little queasy and there's some sort of, you know,

78
00:06:37,260 --> 00:06:42,680
taco event or some headline that gets, uh, yields back down typically over that period.

79
00:06:42,840 --> 00:06:47,480
When you've gotten to that same level here, the move index, which is the bond volatility index

80
00:06:47,480 --> 00:06:53,720
for treasury market, uh, the BAML runs, um, has kind of not, uh, not gone up correspondingly.

81
00:06:53,720 --> 00:06:57,920
you've got this series of, you know, if you were a line squiggler by trade, you would kind of call

82
00:06:57,920 --> 00:07:03,900
these lower highs each time. You're not really getting a blowout thus far in volatility with

83
00:07:03,900 --> 00:07:08,720
any of these spikes. You had the biggest one was obviously in the spring, right before the ceasefire

84
00:07:08,720 --> 00:07:13,540
was announced. You had bond volatility going up the whole month. We had a ceasefire that kind of

85
00:07:13,540 --> 00:07:19,480
brought everything down. You had another big spike in like mid-May, maybe early June. And, you know,

86
00:07:19,480 --> 00:07:24,320
move did go up then, but not quite as much. And now over the last week, you've really seen like

87
00:07:24,320 --> 00:07:28,720
it's kind of bobbing along in this range. Not too early to call whether that's going to continue,

88
00:07:28,940 --> 00:07:33,160
but I think there's a lot of interesting analysis, especially from guys like Michael Howell,

89
00:07:33,260 --> 00:07:38,980
suggesting that treasury is much more, not much more, but at least meaningfully concerned with

90
00:07:38,980 --> 00:07:57,822
bond volatility as much as the kind of absolute level of rates And if that the case and if volatility is in one way or another sufficiently managed either through just market expectations or treasury operations in the background that maybe gives you more headroom to kind of deal with rates at a current at you know the current level for at least some additional

91
00:07:57,822 --> 00:08:02,902
time we've done math in the past and in the newsletter showing that this this level of race

92
00:08:02,902 --> 00:08:08,102
is probably over like a meaningful time frame about all you can really handle you really can't

93
00:08:08,102 --> 00:08:12,762
get into like the five plus five plus range without starting to really crimp the fiscal

94
00:08:12,762 --> 00:08:17,342
math meaningfully in an extremely uncomfortable way. But if you can kind of keep it in this level

95
00:08:17,342 --> 00:08:22,102
with volatility also manageable such that you're not getting big collateral haircuts or, you know,

96
00:08:22,102 --> 00:08:29,482
forced unwinds, that could be an interesting, you know, way to manage this. And moreover,

97
00:08:29,562 --> 00:08:32,642
I think it's just telling you thus far, if something like this chart continues,

98
00:08:33,022 --> 00:08:38,602
I think this is kind of telling you like investors up to this point are not necessarily that queasy,

99
00:08:38,602 --> 00:08:44,542
that worried about months and months more of what we've seen over the last week. Maybe that'll prove

100
00:08:44,542 --> 00:08:51,682
wrong. But I think a notable kind of set of two lines you're going to watch, going to want to

101
00:08:51,682 --> 00:08:56,822
watch closely over the next couple of weeks. Yeah. Yeah. Can they maintain the volatility?

102
00:08:57,282 --> 00:09:02,462
Like, because that's, I mean, the 10 year, 30 year drifting higher. I mean, it seems structurally,

103
00:09:02,462 --> 00:09:07,422
again, going back to line squibbles on the chart, that the long term, the new long term trend for

104
00:09:07,422 --> 00:09:12,822
for yields is higher. And I guess that maybe that's the sort of fallback option that the Fed

105
00:09:12,822 --> 00:09:16,962
and the Treasury have is like, all right, if that's the case, let's just manage the volatility

106
00:09:16,962 --> 00:09:21,942
so markets can adjust on the go. Speaking of volatility, obviously bombing in the straight

107
00:09:21,942 --> 00:09:28,622
Hermuze is going to lead to volatile reactions from the Gulf states, one of which over the weekend

108
00:09:28,622 --> 00:09:35,502
is Qatar pausing the push to ramp up their LNG production after Hermuze tanker attacked. And so

109
00:09:35,502 --> 00:09:42,162
we're seeing disruption in energy markets in this case lng in qatar and when we first began covering

110
00:09:42,162 --> 00:09:48,002
the saga in in iran i think this is one of the biggest things that people were worried about is

111
00:09:48,002 --> 00:09:53,522
the the refineries the natural gas and lng refineries in qatar being hit and creating a

112
00:09:53,522 --> 00:10:00,182
cascading effect so it looks like um that variable is back in the equation which is disruptions to

113
00:10:00,182 --> 00:10:06,202
Qatari LNG production. Yeah. So this is, you know, this is kind of the opposite story of the oil

114
00:10:06,202 --> 00:10:12,042
market where you pretty much saw, have seen after the big spikes in WTI, as we just mentioned,

115
00:10:12,162 --> 00:10:16,242
you saw kind of the prices returned to roughly pre-war levels and we're still kind of bobbing

116
00:10:16,242 --> 00:10:21,782
around there. You can see on the right side here, this is kind of the basic, the European kind of

117
00:10:21,782 --> 00:10:26,702
natural gas benchmark. And all the charts over the next like six months kind of look like this

118
00:10:26,702 --> 00:10:32,102
from August out to January of next year, where you didn't really get the same retrenchment

119
00:10:32,102 --> 00:10:33,442
anywhere close to pre-war levels.

120
00:10:33,442 --> 00:10:37,762
And now we're back up, moving much more meaningfully toward recent highs.

121
00:10:38,562 --> 00:10:43,062
And so if you look at the U.S. benchmark for this is Henry Hub, and that's basically just

122
00:10:43,062 --> 00:10:44,702
bobbing along like a recent bottom.

123
00:10:44,862 --> 00:10:48,502
It's because of our relative kind of positioning that we've talked about on the show, much

124
00:10:48,502 --> 00:10:49,082
less problematic.

125
00:10:49,582 --> 00:10:53,002
But this is what the Europeans are kind of looking at right now.

126
00:10:53,002 --> 00:11:00,062
I think a similar dynamic is prevailing in Asia, which we'll get to maybe on the next slide and kind of the downstream impacts of that.

127
00:11:00,322 --> 00:11:04,642
But this is kind of the one of the big things that from a global perspective, not as much a U.S. perspective,

128
00:11:04,902 --> 00:11:15,642
but a global sovereign debt perspective and a global positioning perspective that I think will be important to watch as we get closer and closer to the fall and the winter where natural gas becomes very, very important.

129
00:11:15,642 --> 00:11:20,962
you know, what do these charts do and how much pain can kind of the countries that are

130
00:11:20,962 --> 00:11:26,702
dependent on and most affected by this kind of disruption? You know, the Rosloff facility,

131
00:11:26,922 --> 00:11:31,822
I believe, is the largest LNG facility in the world. And if that continues to be disrupted

132
00:11:31,822 --> 00:11:36,682
for longer than the market currently thinks right now, at least as you look, if you look at kind of

133
00:11:36,682 --> 00:11:42,362
the move index, if that goes on longer, what's the downstream impact for kind of non-U.S.

134
00:11:42,362 --> 00:11:46,162
countries that are more dependent on this infrastructure. And right now the charts are

135
00:11:46,162 --> 00:11:50,662
not looking great. So this will be, I think, one that we definitely keep an eye on.

136
00:11:50,762 --> 00:11:54,462
Yeah, I explicitly mentioned them earlier, and John just alluded to them, but Japan,

137
00:11:54,822 --> 00:11:59,622
their benchmark bond yield is extending its rise after hitting a 30-year high.

138
00:12:00,482 --> 00:12:06,242
And so I think this is long been stated. Japan has long been stated. Their bond market has long

139
00:12:06,242 --> 00:12:11,722
been stated as the canary in the coal mine. They were the first country to really go out and do a

140
00:12:11,722 --> 00:12:17,522
QE-like experiment in the 90s and they've been riding that wave for 30 years, give or take.

141
00:12:17,922 --> 00:12:23,342
And many people have been looking at Japan for many years saying if they lose control of their

142
00:12:23,342 --> 00:12:27,882
yield curve, that's when things are going to get a bit hairy for the global financial system because

143
00:12:27,882 --> 00:12:35,462
many people have been dependent on the carry trade, taking out cheap debt in Japan, buying

144
00:12:35,462 --> 00:12:40,522
other sovereign bonds, ripping the yield, ripping the arbitrage there, and then pouring it back in.

145
00:12:40,522 --> 00:12:44,602
And if that unwinds, it could create a particularly hairy situation.

146
00:12:44,602 --> 00:12:52,442
And as John just mentioned, Japan is one of these countries that is very dependent on oil and gas from the Middle East.

147
00:12:52,582 --> 00:12:57,142
And if those input costs are going to go up, it's going to put a lot of pressure on the Japanese economy.

148
00:12:57,722 --> 00:12:58,402
Yeah, for sure.

149
00:12:58,702 --> 00:13:01,322
There's a lot there's a lot going on in Japan.

150
00:13:01,562 --> 00:13:09,102
And I I want to resist the urge to, you know, do the something is breaking all caps headline.

151
00:13:09,102 --> 00:13:13,062
because I think the energy piece is huge.

152
00:13:13,562 --> 00:13:16,522
Growing kind of inflationary pressures in the country are huge.

153
00:13:17,362 --> 00:13:22,742
And I think this has always been, you know, the poster child for kind of a long-term QE insanity.

154
00:13:23,362 --> 00:13:25,122
And I think that that's meaningful.

155
00:13:25,862 --> 00:13:34,302
The flip side is, you know, Japan has been, the BOJ has been embarked on a rate hiking cycle now for, I think, well over a year.

156
00:13:34,302 --> 00:13:44,642
And if you look also at what Scott Besson, Treasury Secretary Scott Besson in the U.S. has said, generally he's been endorsing this kind of rate hacking cycle.

157
00:13:44,642 --> 00:13:53,842
So I think there are various policy reasons and strategic reasons that the U.S. might want more normalization of Japanese monetary policy.

158
00:13:54,962 --> 00:13:59,502
But the flip side, of course, is you kind of manage it against the in-carry trade that you alluded to.

159
00:13:59,682 --> 00:14:01,942
It can't get disorderly, right?

160
00:14:01,942 --> 00:14:11,902
It's got to be something where you're not seeing crazy volatility spikes, people getting blown out of positions, needing to force sell, force liquidate U.S. assets.

161
00:14:12,702 --> 00:14:14,862
So it's a delicate balance.

162
00:14:15,362 --> 00:14:21,382
But I think this is obviously a key chart that is a bellwether for a lot of different things we talk about.

163
00:14:22,382 --> 00:14:25,462
And I think the trend here is pretty well established.

164
00:14:25,802 --> 00:14:28,962
But the BOJ looks like it's going to continue its rate hiking cycle.

165
00:14:28,962 --> 00:14:37,442
And I think the question will be, can can that happen? Can they walk and chew gum at the same time relative to all of the objectives that the U.S. wants to achieve?

166
00:14:37,942 --> 00:14:42,002
Or, you know, do you get into a much more kind of hairy situation much more quickly?

167
00:14:42,002 --> 00:14:54,602
But I do think it would behoove all Bitcoin holders, all people who are or gold bugs or anyone who's been watching this for a long time to pump the brakes a little bit on the something is breaking narrative.

168
00:14:54,802 --> 00:14:59,462
Because I think there's a there's a very fine line trying to be walked here between the U.S. and Japan.

169
00:15:00,082 --> 00:15:03,102
And we know what the pressure points are. We know what the failure modes are.

170
00:15:03,102 --> 00:15:19,582
Obviously, this is going to have massive ramifications when you look at a key marginal buyer and a key holder of U.S. treasuries in a situation like this where domestic rates are now becoming relatively much more attractive than they've been for like 30 years, getting these 30-plus-year highs.

171
00:15:19,582 --> 00:15:24,502
that's obviously going to have meaningful trade-offs and impacts, but I would just

172
00:15:24,502 --> 00:15:28,422
kind of benchmark it against and comp it against, you know, what Besson has been saying and kind of

173
00:15:28,422 --> 00:15:43,184
endorsing as it relates to this rate hiking cycle And you know ask yourself if you think that that line can be walked and that needle can be threaded because I think that there a lot going on here under the hood Yeah and it something that we all been aware of

174
00:15:43,284 --> 00:15:48,864
I mean, it's famous now, the Manhattan Institute fireside chat that Scott Bissent had

175
00:15:48,864 --> 00:15:54,844
in the lead up to the 2024 election in which he said there's a global monetary reordering happening.

176
00:15:54,844 --> 00:15:59,764
I want to be on deck in the captain's seat with the president as we're managing that.

177
00:15:59,764 --> 00:16:15,564
And to your point, you have to imagine that over the last year and a half that there has been some reshuffling and some sort of reordering behind the scenes in terms of what's happening between the Treasury and their counterparts across the world.

178
00:16:15,684 --> 00:16:21,524
And maybe it's a setup to allow these yields to rise without the volatility that you mentioned, John.

179
00:16:21,524 --> 00:16:27,464
So maybe they got the infrastructure in place under the hood and behind the scenes.

180
00:16:27,604 --> 00:16:30,344
Like, it's OK, we can we can let these things rise now.

181
00:16:30,544 --> 00:16:30,844
Who knows?

182
00:16:31,304 --> 00:16:41,184
Yeah, I think it's one of the reasons you're seeing things like, you know, the SLR loosening, right, of trying to bring more private banking capacity into the treasury market again.

183
00:16:41,604 --> 00:16:47,444
But I think that all dovetails nicely into into this this next headline, which is the descent doctrine.

184
00:16:47,564 --> 00:16:49,584
The days of America being played are over.

185
00:16:49,584 --> 00:16:50,944
We're not going to get bullied anymore.

186
00:16:50,944 --> 00:16:54,564
we're not going to get pushed around. We're not going to be taken advantage of. This was

187
00:16:54,564 --> 00:16:59,984
an opinion piece, a guest essay in the New York Times released last Tuesday. So day after we

188
00:16:59,984 --> 00:17:05,324
recorded. Yeah. I mean, I think this is, this is an interesting vibe shift to me to see this in

189
00:17:05,324 --> 00:17:11,024
the Times. Now it's, it's a guest essay, right? It's so you could argue like it's not necessarily

190
00:17:11,024 --> 00:17:16,444
the direct endorsement of, of the paper, but if you read through it, it's, it's Muhammad Al-Aryan,

191
00:17:16,444 --> 00:17:19,224
who's a famous macro commentator,

192
00:17:19,384 --> 00:17:22,044
fixture of CNBC and all the business shows.

193
00:17:22,964 --> 00:17:26,504
But he basically walks through the speech

194
00:17:26,504 --> 00:17:29,484
that Besant gave about a month ago at,

195
00:17:29,644 --> 00:17:30,704
I can't remember what it was,

196
00:17:30,764 --> 00:17:31,864
one of the institutes in New York.

197
00:17:31,864 --> 00:17:33,644
The New York Economic Forum, yeah.

198
00:17:33,964 --> 00:17:35,364
We talked about it when it happened,

199
00:17:35,744 --> 00:17:37,284
gave quite a lot of airtime to it

200
00:17:37,284 --> 00:17:39,084
right after it on one of the shows.

201
00:17:39,504 --> 00:17:40,864
But he basically just kind of walks through

202
00:17:40,864 --> 00:17:43,164
everything that Besant laid out in that speech

203
00:17:43,164 --> 00:17:46,024
and encourages analysts and readers

204
00:17:46,024 --> 00:17:51,284
to think of everything that he lays out there as permanent and kind of systemic and all working

205
00:17:51,284 --> 00:17:57,424
together within a framework that Besson has, not just kind of these ad hoc random measures that

206
00:17:57,424 --> 00:18:02,524
Trump is kind of throwing out without much thought. You know, he frames it very much as

207
00:18:02,524 --> 00:18:06,764
something that's intentional and kind of here to stay and that other countries will borrow too,

208
00:18:06,864 --> 00:18:11,444
right? Other countries will start doing similar kind of industrial policies, similar tariff

209
00:18:11,444 --> 00:18:17,664
policies to protect kind of domestic champions. And I just think this is like, if you read it,

210
00:18:17,724 --> 00:18:21,604
if you've been listening to the show, nothing in it is going to be super needle moving to you.

211
00:18:21,724 --> 00:18:26,164
And if you, if you watch that speech from a month ago, you know, it's largely kind of a summary of,

212
00:18:26,164 --> 00:18:30,804
of everything Besson was saying there. But I think again, this is, you know, the times is

213
00:18:30,804 --> 00:18:38,224
whatever your, whatever your opinion of the failing New York times is clearly a widely read

214
00:18:38,224 --> 00:18:43,264
and widely respected outlets still for tastemakers and opinion makers all over the world.

215
00:18:43,784 --> 00:18:47,824
And for this to be for this kind of headline to be prominently featured in the Times is,

216
00:18:47,944 --> 00:18:52,204
I think, an interesting bit of not necessarily predictive programming, but I think it's there's

217
00:18:52,204 --> 00:19:00,144
maybe some ideological pump priming going on here to get opinion makers and opinion leaders

218
00:19:00,144 --> 00:19:05,604
throughout the world to maybe be a little more on sides as to where the major where the puck is

219
00:19:05,604 --> 00:19:09,484
going for a lot of key policy worldwide.

220
00:19:10,064 --> 00:19:12,044
Mimetic seeding is how I would say it.

221
00:19:12,044 --> 00:19:13,224
Mimetic seeding, that's good.

222
00:19:13,724 --> 00:19:20,084
And to your point, I think that is going to dovetail directly into our bread and butter,

223
00:19:20,284 --> 00:19:20,964
which is Bitcoin.

224
00:19:21,344 --> 00:19:24,244
And it's not really our bread and butter, but we're forced to cover a crypto.

225
00:19:24,724 --> 00:19:29,484
And I think what you're highlighting here on this slide is a validation of what you just

226
00:19:29,484 --> 00:19:34,244
said, is that there's a concerted effort to remodel the global economic system.

227
00:19:34,244 --> 00:19:39,164
I mean, it's been pretty, the Trump administration has been pretty transparent.

228
00:19:39,344 --> 00:19:44,704
They believe Bitcoin and crypto have a part to play there, and they are going to do everything

229
00:19:44,704 --> 00:19:51,044
they can to make sure that the industry is primed here in the United States to go out

230
00:19:51,044 --> 00:19:53,344
and build the new infrastructure that is necessary.

231
00:19:53,344 --> 00:19:58,964
And I think you highlight two headlines here on the left that show that there's actually

232
00:19:58,964 --> 00:19:59,644
action happened.

233
00:19:59,724 --> 00:20:02,504
The first coming from February 11th, 2026.

234
00:20:02,504 --> 00:20:08,404
So earlier this year, ABA urges OCC to provide stronger safeguards, clear rules for charter applicants.

235
00:20:08,644 --> 00:20:19,684
And then less than five months later, July 10th, so last week, right before the weekend on Friday, Circle received final OCC approval to establish a national trust bank.

236
00:20:19,844 --> 00:20:27,944
So it looks like they're moving pretty quickly behind the scenes to grease the skids to make sure that the crypto and Bitcoin industry can do what it needs to do.

237
00:20:27,944 --> 00:20:39,464
Yeah, I think that on the left, the really interesting nuance to me is the ABA, the Bankers Association, the Bankers Lobbying Group has been, I think, doing the opposite, right?

238
00:20:39,544 --> 00:20:41,544
Like not creasing the skids, trying to get in the way.

239
00:20:41,544 --> 00:21:00,564
And if you recall, I don't know if we covered it, but earlier this year, kind of a letter went out to the OCC and other regulators basically saying, like, stop moving forward with granting additional regulatory approvals to Coinbase and Circle and Kraken and all the companies that had applied for different charters.

240
00:21:00,564 --> 00:21:14,004
We need to pump the brakes on this and have clearer rulemaking timelines and basically the classic run out the clock type move to just throw sand in the gears and make things take longer.

241
00:21:14,764 --> 00:21:24,004
And a few months later, the OCC, which is part of the Trump administration, effectively said, no, I don't think I will, and continued to move ahead.

242
00:21:24,004 --> 00:21:32,644
And I think we've also gotten Circle wasn't the first. We also got Kraken, I believe, might have been the first within this overall process to get the same designation.

243
00:21:33,224 --> 00:21:35,884
Someone who's more familiar with the regulatory plumbing might be able to correct me.

244
00:21:35,884 --> 00:21:43,664
But in any case, a very interesting headline as it relates to which which side kind of the broader regulatory apparatus is on right now.

245
00:21:43,664 --> 00:21:57,424
And, you know, your latest data point showing that the government is, you know, moving more and more to work hand in hand with the, you know, I'm not going to call it the crypto industry because I just, you know, I can't bring myself to dignify that.

246
00:21:57,424 --> 00:22:12,244
So I'll call it the digital assets industry broadly. But, you know, this is despite a contingency, a major contingency of relevant lobbyists from the banking industry trying to throw roadblocks in the way, you know, the OCC has moved forward with this.

247
00:22:12,604 --> 00:22:16,384
And your latest version of that, your latest indication of that was Circle this past week.

248
00:22:16,944 --> 00:22:24,564
And, you know, that maybe dovetails over to the thing on the right, which is OpenUSD, which was in the last timestamp newsletter.

249
00:22:24,844 --> 00:22:27,144
We didn't get to talk about it last week. We ran out of time.

250
00:22:27,424 --> 00:22:40,244
But I thought we should bring it up just because if you look at the, we don't have to go into all the architecture of this, but basically a new stable coin, quote unquote, for a new dollar stable coin.

251
00:22:40,624 --> 00:22:47,244
And it's run by a run administered by a consortium of companies that you can see here on the right.

252
00:22:47,244 --> 00:23:02,224
And if you look, it's just like an absolute murderer's row of like all the biggest payments, companies, traditional payments, traditional financial services, fintech, you know, custodians, BlackRock, B&Y, tech companies like Google.

253
00:23:02,484 --> 00:23:07,324
You've got Stripe. Obviously, you've got your digital assets, whether it's like Coinbase in there.

254
00:23:07,324 --> 00:23:32,806
But this is I think a really interesting uh update to your latest data point on stable coins which I think is a term that ultimately going to be very outdated uh in just just a few years but let call them digital dollars having a having a certain look and a certain architecture um and specifically moving forward under the guise of and the guidance of some very well and important companies domestically

255
00:23:33,666 --> 00:23:36,186
And I think to just tip our hat

256
00:23:36,186 --> 00:23:38,186
or to to to to our own horn like a little bit,

257
00:23:38,426 --> 00:23:41,526
I think if you look at what's available on OpenUSD right now,

258
00:23:41,546 --> 00:23:44,206
there's not a ton available in the docs yet,

259
00:23:44,206 --> 00:23:47,166
but this all looks very, very much like everything

260
00:23:47,166 --> 00:23:48,306
that we were outlining a few months ago

261
00:23:48,306 --> 00:23:50,786
as it related to the future of stable coins.

262
00:23:50,786 --> 00:23:57,006
So if you go to 1031 timestamp.stablecoins, you can read way more than you probably ever wanted to about why we thought it was going this way.

263
00:23:57,066 --> 00:24:12,886
But I think this is like showing you the puck going like in exactly the direction we were talking about, which is ultimately like, you know, there's no long term meaningful role for blockchains here with this consortium of financial services, heavyweights kind of running the show.

264
00:24:13,086 --> 00:24:16,286
And if you go look at the website, you'll see kind of the way they talk about it validates that.

265
00:24:16,286 --> 00:24:33,266
But I think most importantly, even outside of the debate over blockchains and their use here, I think it's just a really interesting latest data point on the trend of we've talked about reshoring as it relates to manufacturing in U.S. industrial capacity.

266
00:24:33,726 --> 00:24:43,286
I mean, I think this is a big piece of the kind of reshoring like U.S. control over the dollar, like what it means to have a dollar, to use a dollar.

267
00:24:43,286 --> 00:24:48,686
And we've talked about the massive euro dollar market and the offshore dollar market on the show many times before.

268
00:24:49,046 --> 00:24:55,166
Besson has made comments about wanting to reassert U.S. supremacy over that.

269
00:24:55,226 --> 00:24:56,906
And we've talked about different ways that could happen.

270
00:24:57,366 --> 00:25:00,566
And I think OpenUSD is – I don't know who the winner is going to be.

271
00:25:00,886 --> 00:25:01,866
Maybe you'll have many winners.

272
00:25:02,046 --> 00:25:05,886
You'll have OpenUSD, Circle, Tether, other constructs we haven't thought of yet.

273
00:25:05,966 --> 00:25:08,786
Or maybe OpenUSD will be the absolute winner.

274
00:25:09,166 --> 00:25:11,366
Don't really necessarily care so much about that.

275
00:25:11,366 --> 00:25:28,846
But I do think if you could pull off something like this and you could have U.S. domiciled institutions, you know, running a digital dollar effectively that slots into the way that, you know, effectively the banking system, the payment system, all the different tools people already use.

276
00:25:28,946 --> 00:25:32,226
You can make it kind of invisible under the hood of what the dollar system is.

277
00:25:32,226 --> 00:25:37,426
and effectively if then what it means to hold a dollar is to basically hold a digital balance that

278
00:25:37,426 --> 00:25:44,106
is itself holding treasuries as collateral. And that's the way that a dollar is getting defined.

279
00:25:44,426 --> 00:25:48,606
That moves treasury much more kind of front and center into controlling what we think of today

280
00:25:48,606 --> 00:25:53,166
as monetary policy. This is all very embryonic and I think it can fail in a lot of ways. And I

281
00:25:53,166 --> 00:25:58,686
think it's not necessarily totally clear exactly how it will all line up. But everything that I

282
00:25:58,686 --> 00:26:02,366
think we're seeing here on this on this slide and that we've talked about over the last few months

283
00:26:02,366 --> 00:26:07,666
is pointing in that direction right of kind of reshoring U.S. control over the dollar system and

284
00:26:07,666 --> 00:26:12,246
like what it means to have and to use a dollar and I think that'll maybe have some very interesting

285
00:26:12,246 --> 00:26:17,686
implications for financing headroom for the treasury going forward and also you know what

286
00:26:17,686 --> 00:26:22,046
we have on the next couple slides. Yeah sorry for butchering that transition from the ABA headline

287
00:26:22,046 --> 00:26:27,766
to to circle but you corrected it correctly and then all good you're very humble you're very humble

288
00:26:27,766 --> 00:26:31,006
saying we wrote, you worked on that stablecoin piece.

289
00:26:31,126 --> 00:26:31,826
That was all you.

290
00:26:31,946 --> 00:26:34,266
So go read John's stablecoin piece.

291
00:26:34,466 --> 00:26:35,366
I mean, we gave some feedback,

292
00:26:35,586 --> 00:26:37,706
but you did a lot of the legwork there

293
00:26:37,706 --> 00:26:39,306
to put that thesis out there.

294
00:26:39,746 --> 00:26:40,506
Extremely thorough.

295
00:26:40,626 --> 00:26:43,126
Go check it out, 1031.xyz slash stablecoins.

296
00:26:43,346 --> 00:26:44,366
But as John said,

297
00:26:44,946 --> 00:26:47,066
Bitcoin may not be front and center

298
00:26:47,066 --> 00:26:49,326
with these policies in most people's minds.

299
00:26:49,506 --> 00:26:51,026
But in the background, again,

300
00:26:51,286 --> 00:26:53,746
it does seem like the push

301
00:26:53,746 --> 00:26:57,126
for Bitcoin strategic reserve is very real.

302
00:26:57,126 --> 00:27:09,046
It's happening. And what we're seeing now is that the hurdles that we're facing come down to who's actually going to be running the Bitcoin strategic reserve, reserve, which department is going to be treasury?

303
00:27:09,186 --> 00:27:16,426
Is it going to be commerce? Who's actually going to steward the United States Bitcoin strategic reserve?

304
00:27:17,146 --> 00:27:24,526
Yeah. I mean, I think this this headline got played, you know, if you saw it on like a Bloomberg terminal or something, you know, I think it got played as as pretty negative.

305
00:27:24,526 --> 00:27:33,626
And certainly I think if you wanted this to happen or if you thought it should move forward, then any incremental hurdles for the SBR would be a problem.

306
00:27:33,766 --> 00:27:34,926
And that's all fair.

307
00:27:35,026 --> 00:27:52,946
But I think the more interesting piece of it is just the way that this is framed as two government departments vying to run the strategic Bitcoin reserve and kind of this turf war between Treasury and Commerce that to me signals that, A, all the people that are the architects of what we just talked about with reshoring the U.S. dollar system

308
00:27:52,946 --> 00:27:57,366
and kind of reframing what it means to kind of use a dollar and interact with the dollar system,

309
00:27:58,326 --> 00:28:04,086
that they continue to care enough about the SBR to be the ones to, you know,

310
00:28:04,346 --> 00:28:08,966
further wait around and try to be the ones who run it and administer it, I think is pretty meaningful.

311
00:28:08,966 --> 00:28:13,266
And it tells you, like, I don't know how long it will take to start this out

312
00:28:13,266 --> 00:28:18,446
and what various kind of statutory questions that have to be resolved, you know, ultimately will be.

313
00:28:18,446 --> 00:28:36,826
But I think the much more meaningful piece of this headline, in my view, was that all the relevant decision makers who are at the controls of everything we've just talked about are continuing to push to get this done just in the way that they want to benefit their department's fiefdom.

314
00:28:37,226 --> 00:28:41,986
But that probably doesn't happen if this is either fully on ice or just completely irrelevant to them.

315
00:28:42,526 --> 00:28:46,626
And it's funny. Is there an ego battle between Bestent and Howard Lutnick?

316
00:28:46,626 --> 00:28:47,346
I can't imagine.

317
00:28:47,786 --> 00:28:48,306
Eking in.

318
00:28:48,306 --> 00:28:52,206
because we know they've had a very good relationship at the beginning.

319
00:28:52,386 --> 00:28:54,806
In the lead-up, too, wasn't Lutnik buying for Treasury?

320
00:28:55,246 --> 00:28:55,406
Yeah.

321
00:28:55,406 --> 00:28:56,166
Sort of boxed out.

322
00:28:56,386 --> 00:29:00,206
And then I think Basen has had some choice words for Lutnik,

323
00:29:00,306 --> 00:29:03,206
or at least reports have said that he's had choice words for Lutnik.

324
00:29:03,306 --> 00:29:04,226
But we're not here to gossip.

325
00:29:04,326 --> 00:29:05,066
We're here to talk about it.

326
00:29:05,086 --> 00:29:08,786
This is the last slide we have, which I think is positioning and reinforcing

327
00:29:08,786 --> 00:29:13,446
and laying out the thesis for our listeners here

328
00:29:13,446 --> 00:29:16,666
of why a Bitcoin strategic reserve makes sense for the United States

329
00:29:16,666 --> 00:29:20,406
when you consider the incredible lead we have

330
00:29:20,406 --> 00:29:23,806
in terms of Bitcoin adoption in the United States

331
00:29:23,806 --> 00:29:25,446
and the amount of Bitcoin

332
00:29:25,446 --> 00:29:28,506
that the government currently has domain over.

333
00:29:28,946 --> 00:29:30,886
Yeah, you know, this is pretty self-explanatory

334
00:29:30,886 --> 00:29:32,626
and I think we've talked about it on the show before,

335
00:29:32,826 --> 00:29:34,526
but just to wrap up, like this is,

336
00:29:34,926 --> 00:29:36,586
River put this out last week.

337
00:29:36,626 --> 00:29:38,646
I think this is their update of a series of slides

338
00:29:38,646 --> 00:29:39,586
that we've talked about before,

339
00:29:39,926 --> 00:29:41,566
but just showing, you know,

340
00:29:41,566 --> 00:29:43,706
if you highly recommend people go look at this,

341
00:29:43,826 --> 00:29:45,306
you know, I think it's called America

342
00:29:45,306 --> 00:29:46,786
is the Bitcoin superpower.

343
00:29:47,386 --> 00:29:49,886
You can just see the U.S. government

344
00:29:49,886 --> 00:29:53,306
has basically an uncontested lead

345
00:29:53,306 --> 00:29:54,746
in Bitcoin holdings.

346
00:29:54,866 --> 00:29:56,266
Now we can talk about the provenance

347
00:29:56,266 --> 00:29:56,886
of those holdings.

348
00:29:56,966 --> 00:29:58,926
And I think as Americans,

349
00:29:58,926 --> 00:30:00,866
we should maybe be concerned

350
00:30:00,866 --> 00:30:02,626
with how some of those holdings

351
00:30:02,626 --> 00:30:03,226
were attained.

352
00:30:03,646 --> 00:30:04,306
But nevertheless,

353
00:30:04,486 --> 00:30:05,226
just thinking about it

354
00:30:05,226 --> 00:30:06,986
from the government's perspective,

355
00:30:07,306 --> 00:30:08,546
the strategic implications perspective,

356
00:30:09,126 --> 00:30:09,906
that advantage,

357
00:30:10,006 --> 00:30:11,426
as well as just the amount of Bitcoin

358
00:30:11,426 --> 00:30:12,106
that's held privately

359
00:30:12,106 --> 00:30:13,386
by both individuals and companies,

360
00:30:13,806 --> 00:30:15,066
and one company in particular,

361
00:30:15,306 --> 00:30:22,306
in the U.S., I think, positions Bitcoin as or positions the U.S. as uniquely advantaged in

362
00:30:22,306 --> 00:30:27,486
the Bitcoin sphere to the extent that, you know, it wants to exercise that advantage.

363
00:30:27,946 --> 00:30:31,546
And I think if you look at what we've talked about for the last 10 minutes,

364
00:30:31,986 --> 00:30:38,386
all the incentives point to the U.S. and the Trump administration having every reason to

365
00:30:38,386 --> 00:30:43,226
kind of move forward and press this advantage to the extent that, you know, it's interested in

366
00:30:43,226 --> 00:30:48,106
kind of re-architecting the dollar system, the financial system, and what it means to kind of

367
00:30:48,106 --> 00:30:53,186
interact with U.S. productive capacity kind of through the dollar system. So again, I don't want

368
00:30:53,186 --> 00:30:57,246
to overplay this one. It's a picture's worth a thousand words, pretty clear to people, but

369
00:30:57,246 --> 00:31:01,266
we can leave it there. You might want to get some just in case it catches on,

370
00:31:01,646 --> 00:31:05,446
wise man once said. Don't sleep on Bitcoin. We'll see you guys next week.

371
00:31:13,226 --> 00:31:43,206
Thank you.