1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:02,680
Michael Howell, thank you for joining me again. Big day.

2
00:00:03,500 --> 00:00:06,160
Yeah, big day today. Big day out in Jackson Hole.

3
00:00:07,060 --> 00:00:12,220
Everybody's waiting with a bated breath to see what Jerome Powell is going to say.

4
00:00:12,220 --> 00:00:14,560
I was watching. I couldn't sleep this morning.

5
00:00:14,660 --> 00:00:18,920
I woke up at 3.30 a.m. and just decided to get up and start working.

6
00:00:19,100 --> 00:00:22,320
And I've been watching CNBC, and it's been funny watching their commentary.

7
00:00:22,520 --> 00:00:23,420
A lot of back and forth.

8
00:00:23,420 --> 00:00:28,280
I think considering that this meeting is happening today,

9
00:00:28,500 --> 00:00:30,040
we'll post this on Monday.

10
00:00:30,240 --> 00:00:34,700
And so I guess the pressure is on to sort of predict what Jerome Powell is going to do.

11
00:00:34,980 --> 00:00:41,440
How would you describe his current predicament and what he may or may not do later today?

12
00:00:42,400 --> 00:00:45,140
Well, I think it's clearly a difficult situation.

13
00:00:45,340 --> 00:00:50,120
They always say as an old Irish joke that when they say to travelers,

14
00:00:50,500 --> 00:00:51,760
how do you get from here to Dublin?

15
00:00:51,760 --> 00:00:55,640
And the answer is, well, if I was going to Dublin, I wouldn't be starting from here.

16
00:00:56,360 --> 00:01:01,300
And I think that, you know, that's pretty much what I would describe the Fed situation is.

17
00:01:01,400 --> 00:01:08,600
I mean, Jerome Powell is in a difficult situation given the sort of pushback or aggressive pushback he gets from the administration.

18
00:01:09,320 --> 00:01:10,480
I mean, that's for sure.

19
00:01:11,140 --> 00:01:14,580
But I think the other thing is that they kind of painted themselves in a corner a bit.

20
00:01:15,020 --> 00:01:19,360
I mean, on most counts, rates should be lower than they are.

21
00:01:19,820 --> 00:01:22,760
I think he finds it difficult now to probably admit that.

22
00:01:23,400 --> 00:01:24,920
So there is some resistance.

23
00:01:25,520 --> 00:01:31,380
But I think you can see within the FOMC, there is a growing willingness, I think, to cut

24
00:01:31,380 --> 00:01:32,080
interest rates.

25
00:01:32,080 --> 00:01:37,280
I think given what's going on internationally and with rates and maybe as well what's happened

26
00:01:37,280 --> 00:01:43,060
lately to the dollar, the rally, the weakening in the US economy, I think there's grounds

27
00:01:43,060 --> 00:01:44,440
for rates to be cut.

28
00:01:44,520 --> 00:01:45,160
That's for sure.

29
00:01:45,620 --> 00:01:49,120
I think the more difficult question, which is something I'm sure we're going to

30
00:01:49,360 --> 00:01:56,100
dig into, is really what happens to the Fed balance sheet, the Fed operating system looking

31
00:01:56,100 --> 00:02:00,960
out longer term, because they've been promising us some information about the new operating

32
00:02:00,960 --> 00:02:08,060
procedures of the Fed for a long time now, and nothing's come out. So I kind of expect or maybe

33
00:02:08,060 --> 00:02:13,320
think that they're going to do something, announce something at Jackson Hole about the new operating

34
00:02:13,320 --> 00:02:18,680
procedures that they've been talking and thinking about for some time now. That may come out in an

35
00:02:18,680 --> 00:02:24,220
announcement. But I think the more fundamental question is what happens to liquidity and really

36
00:02:24,220 --> 00:02:28,380
the size of the balance sheet. And I think that's relevant, given the fact that if you look over the

37
00:02:28,380 --> 00:02:33,840
first six, seven months of the year, Fed liquidity, the amount of money that the Federal Reserve

38
00:02:33,840 --> 00:02:41,180
injects into money markets, actually was up $350 billion, even though the overall balance sheet

39
00:02:41,180 --> 00:02:48,460
itself, the broad balance sheet, fell by about $250 billion. So you've got liquidity and the

40
00:02:48,460 --> 00:02:54,200
balance sheet going in opposite directions. And that's kind of because there are other ways of

41
00:02:54,200 --> 00:03:00,180
injecting liquidity into the system, apart from the headline balance sheet number. And that's

42
00:03:00,180 --> 00:03:06,000
things like the Treasury general account, the reverse repo program, et cetera. And they've been

43
00:03:06,000 --> 00:03:11,140
actually positively buzzing and actually adding money to markets, which is why risk assets have

44
00:03:11,140 --> 00:03:16,200
kind of done so well over the last few months. The question is that if the Treasury is insisting

45
00:03:16,200 --> 00:03:20,460
on rebuilding that account, their account of the Fed, the Treasurer General account,

46
00:03:20,840 --> 00:03:25,720
which was forcibly run down because of the debt ceiling. If that now is rebuilt in the second

47
00:03:25,720 --> 00:03:30,640
half of the year, then a lot of liquidity is going to come out of markets. Now, that's what

48
00:03:30,640 --> 00:03:34,860
investors are fearing. I don't think it's going to come to that because I just don't think they're

49
00:03:34,860 --> 00:03:38,640
in a position where they can do that. And that's why I say I think the Fed has kind of painted

50
00:03:38,640 --> 00:03:46,180
itself into a corner a bit here. Yeah. In terms of choreographing or making the market aware,

51
00:03:46,200 --> 00:03:52,520
of new operations. Can we dive into that in terms of what they may or may not change or what the

52
00:03:52,520 --> 00:03:58,260
market is looking for them to change? Yeah, I think that a lot of the market talk is really

53
00:03:58,260 --> 00:04:04,180
about whether they're going to change average inflation targeting to maybe change the nuance

54
00:04:04,180 --> 00:04:12,640
of that. Could they change the symmetry in that goal that could be done? For example, I think

55
00:04:12,640 --> 00:04:18,580
that's one of the things that is sort of high on the agenda as a change. There could be more

56
00:04:18,580 --> 00:04:25,640
technical things about how their operating procedures are changed. I mean, that may be

57
00:04:25,640 --> 00:04:30,200
necessary. But I would say, you know, one of the things that may come in, and this has been mooted

58
00:04:30,200 --> 00:04:35,300
in terms of what the Fed has wanted to do, is maybe they're going to announce that they're going to be

59
00:04:35,300 --> 00:04:41,400
a bigger buyer of treasury bills in the market than they have been. Now, one of the things that

60
00:04:41,400 --> 00:04:48,320
was suggested or has been suggested in speeches over recent months is that the makeup of the

61
00:04:48,320 --> 00:04:53,900
Federal Reserve's holdings of government debt, the SOMA account, the so-called SOMA account,

62
00:04:54,320 --> 00:05:00,220
is generally vested in longer duration treasuries. So things like 10-year notes, for example.

63
00:05:00,700 --> 00:05:08,160
And that's not really the sort of representative of the average mix of treasury debt out there in

64
00:05:08,160 --> 00:05:14,440
the market. As you know, there's been a lot of very, very short-term issuance operating,

65
00:05:14,580 --> 00:05:20,000
particularly under Yellen, but Scott Besson's continued that. And so the Treasury slated to

66
00:05:20,000 --> 00:05:25,560
issue a lot more bills. Now, on the one hand, that's playing to this whole argument about

67
00:05:25,560 --> 00:05:31,540
stablecoins being big buyers of Treasuries in the future, and they like bills. Sure, I go along with

68
00:05:31,540 --> 00:05:36,680
that. But then the Federal Reserve should be matching, if you like, in its SOMA account,

69
00:05:36,680 --> 00:05:44,100
the average mix of debt in the market. And the moment they're not, their SOMA account is too

70
00:05:44,100 --> 00:05:51,320
heavily weighted to longer duration debt. So what they may do is reduce the average by buying a lot

71
00:05:51,320 --> 00:05:56,340
of bills. Now, that would certainly help the fund take pressure off funding, and it will enable the

72
00:05:56,340 --> 00:06:02,580
market to get more liquidity. In order to do that, they'd have to sort of change the rules a bit

73
00:06:02,580 --> 00:06:07,720
on what they're talking about in terms of roll-off of debt. So they could say they're going to

74
00:06:07,720 --> 00:06:14,300
continue rolling off existing Treasury notes, but then they add an addendum to say, okay,

75
00:06:14,340 --> 00:06:18,520
we're alongside going to build up our holdings of bills. So they could do something like that.

76
00:06:19,280 --> 00:06:25,400
Nothing's certain, but I would be looking for some subtlety, simply because if you look at the math

77
00:06:25,400 --> 00:06:33,440
here, if they do rebuild the TGA, we're talking about taking $300 billion to $400 billion out of

78
00:06:33,440 --> 00:06:39,600
money markets. And I don't think that's a good idea, to be perfectly honest. I think you'll see

79
00:06:39,600 --> 00:06:47,780
a lot of tensions in markets if that transpires. Yeah. It's fascinating in many regards,

80
00:06:47,920 --> 00:06:53,620
both on the Fed side and the Treasury side, because Scott percent very publicly when he was

81
00:06:53,620 --> 00:06:57,740
coming into the administration at the beginning of the year was lambasting Yellen for hammering

82
00:06:57,740 --> 00:07:03,720
the front end of the yield curve. And I think he's implicitly had to walk that back and just

83
00:07:03,720 --> 00:07:09,400
action speak louder than words. They're still hammering it. And I think even explicitly over

84
00:07:09,400 --> 00:07:15,160
the course of the summer, he has admitted that they will still keep issuing bills on the short

85
00:07:15,160 --> 00:07:21,580
end. And then to your point about the Fed's painted itself in the corner, it seems like

86
00:07:21,580 --> 00:07:26,000
drums in this position where he doesn't want to seem like he's letting politics influence his

87
00:07:26,000 --> 00:07:30,900
decisions. But to your point, if you look at all the ways in which they can inject liquidity,

88
00:07:31,040 --> 00:07:36,180
they're sort of out of arrows in the quiver. I believe reverse repo last I checked is around

89
00:07:36,180 --> 00:07:42,560
22 billion down from 2 trillion a few years ago. Yeah, it's right down. And, you know,

90
00:07:42,640 --> 00:07:48,080
there's not much more they can do to be truthful. So, you know, what you're looking at, I mean,

91
00:07:48,080 --> 00:07:57,080
sort of ironically, is you're shifting really from a regime of Fed QE, or whether it's a hidden QE,

92
00:07:57,200 --> 00:08:02,440
but the Fed has been the mainstay of liquidity coming into markets. And you're shifting to a

93
00:08:02,440 --> 00:08:08,680
situation where the Treasury is more and more responsible for, if you like, liquidity easing.

94
00:08:09,120 --> 00:08:14,480
It's taken on the mantle. Now, whether that is vested in the Treasury because of the

95
00:08:14,480 --> 00:08:19,780
durations in the Treasury General account, whether it's as well or probably more particularly

96
00:08:19,780 --> 00:08:24,820
because of just the changes in the average duration of issuance. And this is an important

97
00:08:24,820 --> 00:08:31,700
point because very generally, I mean, we can think of liquidity as being an asset divided by its

98
00:08:31,700 --> 00:08:37,340
average duration and think of duration as sort of the maturity of the debt. So if you're issuing

99
00:08:37,340 --> 00:08:45,580
lots of debt at very short maturity, that quotient, that ratio between the asset size

100
00:08:45,580 --> 00:08:50,060
or the debt size and its average maturity is going to increase quite dramatically because

101
00:08:50,060 --> 00:08:56,400
on average, you're issuing, you're replacing a 10-year note, say, with a three-month bill.

102
00:08:56,940 --> 00:09:00,380
So the liquidity available to the private sector is going to go up enormously.

103
00:09:01,080 --> 00:09:06,080
Now, that kind of makes a difference as well for a whole lot of reasons.

104
00:09:06,080 --> 00:09:11,800
I mean, one is that we live in a world now where collateralized lending is absolutely

105
00:09:11,800 --> 00:09:12,360
critical.

106
00:09:12,940 --> 00:09:17,160
You know, latest estimates from the World Bank who have dug very deep into this worldwide

107
00:09:17,160 --> 00:09:24,180
tell us that something like close to 80% of all lending worldwide now is collaterally

108
00:09:24,180 --> 00:09:24,540
based.

109
00:09:24,680 --> 00:09:26,960
I mean, that's an astonishingly high figure.

110
00:09:27,400 --> 00:09:28,360
But that's the reality.

111
00:09:28,520 --> 00:09:31,840
This is how the world has changed since the global financial crisis.

112
00:09:32,340 --> 00:09:34,220
Collateral is really critical to the system.

113
00:09:34,220 --> 00:09:42,500
And so what you've got to have in terms of future liquidity growth, in other words, future lending growth, is a stable collateral base.

114
00:09:42,580 --> 00:09:50,680
You can't afford to have the bond markets going awry. Now, with that regard, you can help that situation really in two regards.

115
00:09:51,100 --> 00:09:55,700
One is you can start to issue a lot of very short term paper, in other words, bills.

116
00:09:56,060 --> 00:10:03,280
Now, I know we accept the fact that this is not sort of great long term planning from the treasurer's perspective.

117
00:10:03,280 --> 00:10:11,760
And Stanley Druckenmiller has been on record as saying over the years, look, these are the numbers that you'd expect to see, or this is the policy you'd expect to come out of Argentina.

118
00:10:12,220 --> 00:10:15,980
And we can't really say that about use Argentina as the benchmark anymore.

119
00:10:16,140 --> 00:10:17,020
But you know what I mean.

120
00:10:17,280 --> 00:10:21,560
It's a Latin American type funding process to fund at the short end.

121
00:10:21,720 --> 00:10:23,760
But, you know, hey, the US is now doing that.

122
00:10:23,760 --> 00:10:33,220
But one of the advantages, if there is an advantage in doing that, is you actually don't absorb liquidity from the market.

123
00:10:33,380 --> 00:10:36,820
You actually create more liquidity because you're showing a very short-term bill.

124
00:10:37,380 --> 00:10:42,140
And what's more, you help to contain volatility in the collateral markets.

125
00:10:42,320 --> 00:10:46,680
Now, that's absolutely critical, and that shouldn't be lost sight of.

126
00:10:46,680 --> 00:11:03,220
One of the things that we've seen over the last few months, which is a wonkish point, but it's still really important here, is that if you depend on collateral for liquidity and credit growth, what you need is stability in these markets.

127
00:11:03,280 --> 00:11:04,800
In other words, you want very low volatility.

128
00:11:05,280 --> 00:11:15,380
And there is a statistic out there that I look at very keenly, which is called the MOVE index, which is a measure of the volatility across the Treasury yield curve.

129
00:11:15,380 --> 00:11:23,280
So it's bond volatility. And if you look at that index, it's plunged dramatically over the course

130
00:11:23,280 --> 00:11:29,400
of the last few months. Now, that could be purely coincidental. It could be by accident. I think

131
00:11:29,400 --> 00:11:33,860
it's being engineered lower. I think the Treasury and the Fed realize that they've got to get

132
00:11:33,860 --> 00:11:39,920
volatility down. If they get volatility down, that's liquidity enhancing. It's good for financial

133
00:11:39,920 --> 00:11:46,520
markets. And what's more, it keeps hedge funds in the game of buying treasuries. Because one of the

134
00:11:46,520 --> 00:11:52,320
things you will recall, Marty, is that foreign buyers have kind of slowed down. They haven't

135
00:11:52,320 --> 00:11:59,180
reversed, but they've certainly slowed down their buying of US debt. Traditional buyers of debt in

136
00:11:59,180 --> 00:12:05,960
the US are not really there in size because the yield curve is still quite flat. So there's not

137
00:12:05,960 --> 00:12:10,400
really the uplift on sort of buying long-term debt and funding it in the short-term markets.

138
00:12:10,760 --> 00:12:15,360
So they're really dependent on the hedge funds who are doing something very technical called a basis

139
00:12:15,360 --> 00:12:21,300
trade, which means shorting futures and buying cash bonds. Now, that's at the margin, the big

140
00:12:21,300 --> 00:12:26,720
buyers of treasuries. And what those hedge funds really require is low volatility in the market.

141
00:12:27,100 --> 00:12:32,980
So I think there's an awful lot of volatility targeting going on. That's, one would have to

142
00:12:32,980 --> 00:12:39,520
say a dangerous policy, because it can go wrong at a moment's notice. You can suddenly lose control

143
00:12:39,520 --> 00:12:44,560
of volatility. Volatility can spike. But it does show that there's, I think, behind the scenes,

144
00:12:44,660 --> 00:12:49,720
a lot of awareness that liquidity is a critical factor in markets right now.

145
00:12:50,860 --> 00:12:56,000
Yeah. And your newsletter from yesterday, diving further into this point, I'm going to make

146
00:12:56,000 --> 00:13:02,220
a question and then actually two questions. First, it's just describing the world collateral

147
00:13:02,220 --> 00:13:08,020
multiplier, like reducing the volatility of the yields, like gives people more confidence

148
00:13:08,020 --> 00:13:14,640
and certainty that the bonds, the bonds connected to those yields are good collateral, liquid

149
00:13:14,640 --> 00:13:23,180
collateral. And then the second question I have is, are you essentially describing yield curve

150
00:13:23,180 --> 00:13:28,000
control without saying it explicitly? Yeah, I think it is. I mean, it's a form of

151
00:13:28,000 --> 00:13:32,620
yield curve control. I mean, there's no question about that. I mean, that basically, I mean,

152
00:13:32,640 --> 00:13:39,120
all these operations are trying to manipulate investors into certain parts of the curve. And

153
00:13:39,120 --> 00:13:45,380
they don't want long duration yields, in other words, 10-year, 20-year yields to back up very

154
00:13:45,380 --> 00:13:53,520
much. And then ideally, like investors to be in the front end. And even more, what they'd like is

155
00:13:53,520 --> 00:13:58,400
J-PAL to cut interest rates. Because if they start cutting rates at the short end of the market,

156
00:13:58,620 --> 00:14:04,720
the cost of bill finance is going to go right down. And that's going to save the Treasury a

157
00:14:04,720 --> 00:14:08,860
lot of money in terms of interest payments. So I think absolutely, this is what they want.

158
00:14:09,060 --> 00:14:17,520
And if they can rational or create shortages of longer-term debt at the long end of the market,

159
00:14:17,600 --> 00:14:30,129
in other words they going to starve the pension funds and insurance companies with longer duration government bonds then those yields would be down as well So I think there definitely yield curve control Yeah

160
00:14:30,929 --> 00:14:33,349
And I mean, that's the big question in my mind.

161
00:14:33,389 --> 00:14:38,729
Once you go down this path, is it complete Japanification of the yield curve?

162
00:14:38,769 --> 00:14:43,969
And if you look over Japan right now, their 30 and 40-year are breaking away, those yields.

163
00:14:43,969 --> 00:14:50,229
And is this – they're trying to be as implicit as possible.

164
00:14:50,229 --> 00:14:53,929
But as you're describing, it gets pretty clear. This is what they want.

165
00:14:54,069 --> 00:15:00,969
Like, is this a point of no return in terms of driving demand on the longer end of the yield curve from foreign buyers?

166
00:15:02,089 --> 00:15:04,169
Yeah, I think one's got to put this in context.

167
00:15:04,369 --> 00:15:07,789
I mean, we're talking here about the US. We're not talking about a Latin American economy.

168
00:15:07,929 --> 00:15:12,789
And it would take an awful long time for the US to sort of spoil its reputation here.

169
00:15:13,229 --> 00:15:17,329
The US dollar is still the principal safe asset in the world.

170
00:15:18,189 --> 00:15:21,329
US Treasurers are still the main, they're pristine collateral.

171
00:15:21,589 --> 00:15:23,069
It would take a lot to dent that.

172
00:15:23,569 --> 00:15:28,309
And despite the sort of the media which have been jumping on this ridiculous bandwagon to

173
00:15:28,309 --> 00:15:32,269
say it's the end of the dollar or it's the end of the Treasury market or whatever, as

174
00:15:32,269 --> 00:15:36,589
the dollar had a little bit of a wobble earlier on this year, I mean, that clearly is not

175
00:15:36,589 --> 00:15:37,109
the case.

176
00:15:37,569 --> 00:15:41,169
But reputation, I mean, the shine can come off reputations.

177
00:15:41,169 --> 00:15:42,229
I mean, it would take time.

178
00:15:42,649 --> 00:15:46,809
But I think that you're absolutely right to say, look, we're embarking on a journey here

179
00:15:46,809 --> 00:15:52,069
and we're treading down a path, and that path is not a very attractive one, because it could end up

180
00:15:52,069 --> 00:15:57,409
rather like Japan. Japan is now struggling to contain yields along into the market,

181
00:15:57,849 --> 00:16:05,049
because they've basically been undertaking this yield curve control or manipulation for so long.

182
00:16:05,309 --> 00:16:12,829
And you can only squeeze a balloon so much until it bursts. And that's the problem that they're

183
00:16:12,829 --> 00:16:17,609
getting into. Now, I think the US is some years away from that, but I think that you've got to

184
00:16:17,609 --> 00:16:24,449
be alert to these dangers. And if you look at the pressures on the US Treasury market right now,

185
00:16:24,909 --> 00:16:30,829
I mean, paradoxically, they're not really coming from domestic largesse right now. They're actually

186
00:16:30,829 --> 00:16:37,189
coming internationally from pressure on Japanese yields and German yields. So US yields at the long

187
00:16:37,189 --> 00:16:41,449
end of the market are actually being pulled up by those factors right now. That's not to say

188
00:16:41,449 --> 00:16:46,349
that there couldn't be a domestic problem upcoming in the next two or three years,

189
00:16:46,349 --> 00:16:49,949
which would actually push yields up. So I think the danger that we've got here,

190
00:16:50,029 --> 00:16:54,729
as you rightly point out, is we're sort of moving down a path which is not a very attractive one

191
00:16:54,729 --> 00:17:01,089
from the perspective of long-term interest rates. And this is the dilemma that everybody faces.

192
00:17:01,649 --> 00:17:05,729
You know, the US may well be the cleanest shirt in the laundry, but, you know, hey,

193
00:17:05,749 --> 00:17:10,189
it's in the laundry. A lot of other countries are in a worse shape, we acknowledge, but it's not

194
00:17:10,189 --> 00:17:15,369
really, you know, to keep saying that we're the cleanest shirt and everyone else is in a worse

195
00:17:15,369 --> 00:17:20,709
situation is not really great salvation here. The problem is debt and we've got to get off this debt

196
00:17:20,709 --> 00:17:29,429
problem. And it's not easy. No. And that's like I was describing to you before we hit record.

197
00:17:30,209 --> 00:17:36,349
I wrote a newsletter this morning, basically just wanted to flag to people. I know everybody's

198
00:17:36,349 --> 00:17:43,829
focused on what's happening in Jackson Hole right now. But if you look over at the margin

199
00:17:43,829 --> 00:17:49,729
and leverage in the system, nominally, it's at all time highs. And in real terms, it's right below

200
00:17:49,729 --> 00:17:58,869
all time highs hit in 2021. And then you consider recent industrial inflation, friends with PPI being

201
00:17:58,869 --> 00:18:04,409
relatively elevated. You look at the Trump administration and the fact that they are

202
00:18:04,409 --> 00:18:10,369
obviously looking at this artificial intelligence boom as a national security risk and they want to

203
00:18:10,369 --> 00:18:17,429
do everything they can to make sure they win the race against china to get the predominant ai

204
00:18:17,429 --> 00:18:23,969
models in u.s shores or operated by u.s companies and then you look at

205
00:18:23,969 --> 00:18:31,269
what's happening in jackson hall likelihood of rates coming down being higher than it has been

206
00:18:31,269 --> 00:18:32,349
in some time.

207
00:18:33,309 --> 00:18:34,089
And I'm just wondering

208
00:18:34,089 --> 00:18:35,309
with leverage where it is,

209
00:18:35,469 --> 00:18:36,929
with markets at all time highs,

210
00:18:37,049 --> 00:18:38,409
like what does this look like

211
00:18:38,409 --> 00:18:39,069
moving forward?

212
00:18:39,229 --> 00:18:40,969
The lower rates go full QE

213
00:18:40,969 --> 00:18:43,869
with all these other

214
00:18:43,869 --> 00:18:45,729
external factors playing in,

215
00:18:45,769 --> 00:18:47,489
particularly with AI

216
00:18:47,489 --> 00:18:49,689
and the amount of investment

217
00:18:49,689 --> 00:18:50,309
that's going to be needed

218
00:18:50,309 --> 00:18:51,669
to build out the energy infrastructure

219
00:18:51,669 --> 00:18:52,409
to make it possible

220
00:18:52,409 --> 00:18:53,129
in the first place.

221
00:18:54,289 --> 00:18:55,069
Yeah, I think these are all

222
00:18:55,069 --> 00:18:55,929
these are all great points.

223
00:18:56,009 --> 00:18:57,649
I mean, it puts Jackson Hole

224
00:18:57,649 --> 00:18:58,669
kind of into perspective

225
00:18:58,669 --> 00:18:59,429
because there are

226
00:18:59,429 --> 00:19:00,569
bigger things out there

227
00:19:00,569 --> 00:19:00,949
that we could

228
00:19:00,949 --> 00:19:07,269
be alert to. There's a slide that I've given you, you can put up on the screen, which is looking at

229
00:19:07,269 --> 00:19:14,349
the global liquidity cycle. And that kind of frames the issue that we face. Now, this is

230
00:19:14,349 --> 00:19:21,169
looking at the world. The index shown is a black line, which is our index of the momentum of

231
00:19:21,169 --> 00:19:27,769
liquidity through world financial markets. So this is the amount of money. This is not M2 or

232
00:19:27,769 --> 00:19:32,529
M1 or any of the monetary aggregates. This is money which is flowing through financial markets,

233
00:19:32,529 --> 00:19:37,569
which is really driving financial asset prices. And what we tried to show there is that there is

234
00:19:37,569 --> 00:19:42,729
a rhythm, a pretty standard rhythm of about five to six years in that cycle.

235
00:19:43,509 --> 00:19:50,149
And the sine wave that we've drawn on top of that was actually drawn up 25 years ago in the year

236
00:19:50,149 --> 00:19:56,009
2000. And we haven't changed it thereafter. It was done by Fourier analysis for those that are

237
00:19:56,009 --> 00:20:01,509
mathematically inclined. But it's been sort of continued on at the same frequency, which is that

238
00:20:01,509 --> 00:20:09,389
65-month tempo. And what you've seen over the course of the last cycle movement is that we've

239
00:20:09,389 --> 00:20:15,249
been absolutely on track. So the cycle bottomed in October of 22, and it's been moving up.

240
00:20:15,249 --> 00:20:21,589
The volatility you've seen is actually largely a China phenomenon. And I can try and show

241
00:20:21,589 --> 00:20:32,169
what that looks like if you take a look. Hopefully, that slide has changed to the advanced

242
00:20:32,169 --> 00:20:37,069
economy stripping out China. And you get a much, much cleaner line. Now, we can drill into what's

243
00:20:37,069 --> 00:20:41,449
going on in China if you like. But I think the big issue here is that the cycle is basically

244
00:20:41,449 --> 00:20:49,249
beginning to swing, to turn or get towards the peak. And that's clearly a critical factor.

245
00:20:49,809 --> 00:20:55,089
Now, if you put that in, as I've shown in this third slide, this is looking at where

246
00:20:55,089 --> 00:20:57,209
we are against the normal cycle.

247
00:20:57,869 --> 00:21:00,829
Now, this is not set in stone.

248
00:21:00,989 --> 00:21:02,109
So we've got to be careful.

249
00:21:02,229 --> 00:21:03,709
And we're just playing the averages here.

250
00:21:03,869 --> 00:21:06,489
But the averages are important to watch as a benchmark.

251
00:21:06,889 --> 00:21:11,909
And that dotted line is the average cycle since 1970, the average liquidity cycle.

252
00:21:12,389 --> 00:21:15,469
And our view is that liquidity drives markets.

253
00:21:15,869 --> 00:21:18,489
And so you've got to be aware, alert to this.

254
00:21:18,489 --> 00:21:24,769
And the red line is the current cycle. Now, we're not turning down yet. That's not the point. Maybe

255
00:21:24,769 --> 00:21:29,789
we've got a little way to go before we reach the peak. But you can kind of see that, put in context,

256
00:21:30,229 --> 00:21:36,729
this is the situation that we're trying to grapple with. Now, I put in the earlier slide,

257
00:21:36,809 --> 00:21:42,869
which was the world one, so adding back China, a projection. And that projection is showing

258
00:21:42,869 --> 00:21:50,189
that we are reaching a peak, you know, maybe in six months, nine months time, and then we kind of

259
00:21:50,189 --> 00:21:56,769
go down. And the question is, why do we go down? And that's an important thing to address. So let

260
00:21:56,769 --> 00:22:03,529
me try and address the reason why we think things may be going down. Now, one of the arguments

261
00:22:03,529 --> 00:22:12,089
is to look at this slide, which is comparing the current cycle shown in orange here with

262
00:22:12,089 --> 00:22:19,729
the cycle back in the 1980s. Now, a lot of your viewers probably won't remember the 80s or whatever,

263
00:22:19,969 --> 00:22:25,949
but that's when I started in financial markets. And I remember the 87 crash all too well.

264
00:22:26,829 --> 00:22:31,749
I was at Salomon Brothers at the time and witnessed it sort of front on. And basically,

265
00:22:31,749 --> 00:22:41,029
what you saw was a very similar move to what we're seeing right now. You had a plaza record in 85,

266
00:22:41,029 --> 00:22:46,389
which was an attempt to get the dollar down. And just think back to the word accord,

267
00:22:47,109 --> 00:22:52,649
Mar-a-Lago accord. Whenever politicians or policymakers talk of accords, they're talking

268
00:22:52,649 --> 00:23:00,649
about sizable exchange rate adjustments. And we've had that. That allowed foreign central banks back

269
00:23:00,649 --> 00:23:07,749
in 85 and again now to ease policy. And that was a factor that drove global equality up.

270
00:23:08,229 --> 00:23:12,649
It launched a recovery in the world economy, rising commodity prices.

271
00:23:12,849 --> 00:23:14,229
We're sort of getting that now.

272
00:23:14,229 --> 00:23:17,989
It began to push yields in bond markets higher.

273
00:23:18,229 --> 00:23:19,469
We're getting that now.

274
00:23:19,749 --> 00:23:28,409
And it was ended basically in late 1987 by the Germans saying that they were concerned

275
00:23:28,409 --> 00:23:33,269
about inflation and they were thinking about and planning to raise interest rates.

276
00:23:33,709 --> 00:23:35,449
The crash stopped them doing that.

277
00:23:35,589 --> 00:23:37,089
But that was their intention.

278
00:23:37,089 --> 00:23:42,869
And because of the Plaza Record and Louvre Accords, there were set, if you like, trading

279
00:23:42,869 --> 00:23:45,509
bands between currencies and between interest rates.

280
00:23:45,829 --> 00:23:48,509
So if the Germans moved, the US would have to move.

281
00:23:48,949 --> 00:23:53,629
And Treasury Secretary Baker at the time was actually much more inclined to want rates

282
00:23:53,629 --> 00:23:59,729
lower, a little bit like the Treasury and the administration are talking to the Fed now

283
00:23:59,729 --> 00:24:00,609
get rates down.

284
00:24:00,909 --> 00:24:02,729
That's what Baker was doing at the time.

285
00:24:02,729 --> 00:24:08,029
And in the event, things went awry, investors got spooked.

286
00:24:08,489 --> 00:24:11,349
They realized the liquidity cycle was about to end.

287
00:24:11,469 --> 00:24:16,669
You can see the dramatic move down in that red line at the time.

288
00:24:17,229 --> 00:24:19,749
And that's really what happened.

289
00:24:19,829 --> 00:24:20,669
That caused the crash.

290
00:24:21,209 --> 00:24:24,809
Now, the orange line is moving up in that direction.

291
00:24:25,309 --> 00:24:31,869
So your concerns about bubbles and high PEs are very well said,

292
00:24:31,869 --> 00:24:34,649
because this is what we expect at this stage of the cycle.

293
00:24:35,129 --> 00:24:36,249
We haven't been there yet.

294
00:24:36,349 --> 00:24:39,969
We haven't had the trigger, but we're clearly getting late in the cycle.

295
00:24:40,309 --> 00:24:41,689
And those are things to think about.

296
00:24:42,069 --> 00:24:48,389
So let's sort of try and articulate why you could be getting this cycle ending sign.

297
00:24:48,869 --> 00:24:55,449
What I want to do is just to move on, if I can, in this presentation to another slide.

298
00:24:56,409 --> 00:25:01,829
I'm just going to go through these bits and get to the bit I want to start with.

299
00:25:01,869 --> 00:25:07,189
which is just here. And that's saying that this is what we've got to think about in terms of

300
00:25:07,189 --> 00:25:15,169
understanding risk in financial markets. And this is looking at the ratio between debt shown here

301
00:25:15,169 --> 00:25:19,809
for all advanced economies and the amount of liquidity they've got. So in other words,

302
00:25:19,849 --> 00:25:24,989
the ratio of debt to liquidity. Now, why is this so critical? The reason it's so critical is that

303
00:25:24,989 --> 00:25:31,989
debt has to be refinanced. It always has a maturity. So if you issue five-year debt,

304
00:25:32,289 --> 00:25:37,609
in five years' time, you've got to refinance that debt or pay it back. The spoiler alert is that

305
00:25:37,609 --> 00:25:44,329
debt's never paid back. It's only ever refinanced. So what you get is a need to refinance periodically.

306
00:25:45,149 --> 00:25:49,749
And what this chart is basically showing is that ratio between debt and liquidity.

307
00:25:49,749 --> 00:25:55,749
If you get lots of debt relative to liquidity, you're going to struggle to do the refinancing.

308
00:25:55,909 --> 00:25:56,929
It's much more of a problem.

309
00:25:57,589 --> 00:26:02,449
And what I've shown is that when you get above that threshold of about two times of that

310
00:26:02,449 --> 00:26:07,569
ratio, that dotted line, you get financial crises, which we've annotated there.

311
00:26:07,869 --> 00:26:12,569
And almost every financial crisis, if you look back, has been a debt refinancing crisis

312
00:26:12,569 --> 00:26:13,289
in some way.

313
00:26:13,689 --> 00:26:15,269
And that's important to understand.

314
00:26:15,269 --> 00:26:21,889
Now, if you look at the other side of that threshold, when you're very low, there's lots

315
00:26:21,889 --> 00:26:29,329
of liquidity. Liquidity becomes abundant, and its vent is financial assets. It creates asset bubbles.

316
00:26:29,869 --> 00:26:36,169
Now, if you look at the last five to 10 years, we've labeled that the everything bubble. Why is

317
00:26:36,169 --> 00:26:41,869
that? It's there because you've got excessive liquidity relative to debt for two reasons.

318
00:26:41,869 --> 00:26:47,849
I mean, one is that every episode of crises or tension in the world economy, be it COVID

319
00:26:47,849 --> 00:26:53,229
or be it the GFC, policymakers come in and just throw liquidity at the system.

320
00:26:53,349 --> 00:26:54,729
They need to stabilize it.

321
00:26:55,009 --> 00:26:59,209
They don't want the risk of a credit crisis, a serious one.

322
00:26:59,429 --> 00:27:00,729
So they throw in lots of liquidity.

323
00:27:01,429 --> 00:27:05,389
And then the other thing they did, particularly around the time of COVID, was to put interest

324
00:27:05,389 --> 00:27:07,469
rates down to near zero levels.

325
00:27:07,849 --> 00:27:10,529
Well, that just encouraged everyone to term out their debt.

326
00:27:10,529 --> 00:27:17,369
And people were basically terming debt out in 2020, 21, 22 at very low interest rates.

327
00:27:17,469 --> 00:27:23,469
But they were terming it out five years later, let's say, in 26, 27, 28.

328
00:27:23,949 --> 00:27:26,949
And that is now likely to come back onto the horizon.

329
00:27:27,549 --> 00:27:31,929
Now, you'll see that in this chart, which is showing the change in the average debt

330
00:27:31,929 --> 00:27:32,269
role.

331
00:27:32,509 --> 00:27:34,929
And look at that bunching around the end of the decade.

332
00:27:35,049 --> 00:27:36,649
There's a lot of debt to refinance.

333
00:27:37,069 --> 00:27:39,729
That could be household debt, syndicated loan debt.

334
00:27:40,149 --> 00:27:42,349
That's debt of high-yield bonds.

335
00:27:42,629 --> 00:27:43,609
There's government debt.

336
00:27:43,929 --> 00:27:47,689
Everything's sort of coming up into that concentrated period.

337
00:27:48,549 --> 00:27:52,549
And the reason this is so unusual is that, you know, when I was at Salomon Brothers in

338
00:27:52,549 --> 00:27:58,609
the 80s and early 90s, the Bible that everyone looked at and read was a book called The History

339
00:27:58,609 --> 00:28:00,369
of Interest Rates by Sidney Homer.

340
00:28:01,949 --> 00:28:08,749
And that book, which is sort of the Bible of interest rates, goes back, I think, 4,000

341
00:28:08,749 --> 00:28:09,269
years.

342
00:28:09,729 --> 00:28:14,049
Nowhere in that book is there any mention of zero interest rates.

343
00:28:14,489 --> 00:28:17,829
So in 4,000 years, we haven't had it, but we did have it in COVID.

344
00:28:18,429 --> 00:28:20,589
Even negative rates, in fact, as you recall.

345
00:28:20,949 --> 00:28:21,989
And that's why it's so unusual.

346
00:28:22,129 --> 00:28:26,689
And that's why we're kind of recovering from this mess, because basically that incentivized

347
00:28:26,689 --> 00:28:30,649
everybody to take on more debt and turn out the existing stuff.

348
00:28:30,929 --> 00:28:32,529
And this is the problem that we're creating.

349
00:28:32,669 --> 00:28:34,409
So what you're getting is this debt roll.

350
00:28:34,409 --> 00:28:55,899
The other thing that I going to say which kind of hooks into your point your very good point about AI is that a lot of the liquidity that we had in the system over the last five years or so has come through the big tech firms in the US who have generated vast cash flows They haven invested in them particularly They basically kept them in treasury

351
00:28:56,359 --> 00:29:01,659
They've been out there in the money market sitting near fueling liquidity. But now the tech spend

352
00:29:01,659 --> 00:29:08,339
is eye-wateringly large. I mean, from the latest figures I saw, the tech companies are spending a

353
00:29:08,339 --> 00:29:15,939
billion dollars a day on new capex in AI or whatever. So you're talking about over a two-year

354
00:29:15,939 --> 00:29:21,779
period, probably as much as $2 trillion, sorry, as a trillion dollars of new capital spend. And

355
00:29:21,779 --> 00:29:29,679
that is clearly money that is coming out of financial markets. Money that's anywhere must be

356
00:29:29,679 --> 00:29:35,859
somewhere. And the fact is, if it's in the real economy, it's not in financial markets.

357
00:29:36,379 --> 00:29:41,799
And that's the reality. So you get to this slide that I've just put up here. And that's saying,

358
00:29:41,799 --> 00:29:46,519
this is the problem that everyone's got to start thinking about. This is the debt liquidity cycle.

359
00:29:46,879 --> 00:29:53,899
At the heart of the system is this collateral stability requirement, which is saying that the

360
00:29:53,899 --> 00:29:59,239
US Treasury market is absolutely key here. We've got to have a stable Treasury market.

361
00:29:59,819 --> 00:30:04,499
That's why you've got the Fed and the Treasury geared up, I think, to maintaining volatility,

362
00:30:04,499 --> 00:30:12,239
a low volatility. And the way that you can understand that is to look at that left-hand wing,

363
00:30:12,599 --> 00:30:18,799
which is how debt is converted into liquidity, because basically you need high-quality debt to

364
00:30:18,799 --> 00:30:24,179
create liquidity. And what it's saying is that the repo collateral markets are absolutely central

365
00:30:24,179 --> 00:30:30,559
here. And you've got to look at things like the move index or SOFA spreads. And here are just two

366
00:30:30,559 --> 00:30:37,199
examples. This is looking at sofa spread. So this is saying, is there a shortage of good quality

367
00:30:37,199 --> 00:30:41,959
collateral in the system or a lack of liquidity? And this is showing when you get spikes. Now,

368
00:30:43,539 --> 00:30:50,299
there's been a lot of spikes or a lot of activity in the last 12 months. So you can see that if this

369
00:30:50,299 --> 00:30:57,239
is looking at the pulse of a patient in a hospital, you can see that they're getting pretty excited

370
00:30:57,239 --> 00:31:02,899
here. And they're moving up towards a coronary or whatever it may be. But this is the thing.

371
00:31:03,199 --> 00:31:07,219
Federal Reserve is onto this, and they're trying to keep these rates down as best they can

372
00:31:07,219 --> 00:31:12,579
by changing bank reserves. And that's why I think that it's going to be really, really tough

373
00:31:12,579 --> 00:31:16,759
to rebuild the TGA in the next six months without there being a serious problem.

374
00:31:17,239 --> 00:31:22,459
So I trust the Fed is up to this, is onto this. And so that's why I think there needs to be

375
00:31:22,459 --> 00:31:26,999
some fundamental change in their operating procedures. And here's the move index just

376
00:31:26,999 --> 00:31:34,859
to show what's been going on. And I've been arguing this point about move volatility coming

377
00:31:34,859 --> 00:31:39,979
back into this range and there being a target. And I was accused, I think, in one of the financial

378
00:31:39,979 --> 00:31:45,079
newspapers, maybe it was the FT a few days ago, sort of launching a conspiracy theory. I don't

379
00:31:45,079 --> 00:31:50,119
think it's a conspiracy theory. It's just a fact. I mean, it makes absolutely every sense in the

380
00:31:50,119 --> 00:31:54,579
world for the Treasury and the Fed to target volatility, because hedge funds are key buyers

381
00:31:54,579 --> 00:31:56,099
and the collateral markets are critical.

382
00:31:56,559 --> 00:31:57,199
So why not?

383
00:31:57,679 --> 00:31:59,539
So, you know, that's the story.

384
00:32:00,079 --> 00:32:02,839
And that's the risks that people face, I think.

385
00:32:03,859 --> 00:32:05,239
But we're not over yet, you know.

386
00:32:06,359 --> 00:32:07,919
The fat lady hasn't sung.

387
00:32:08,459 --> 00:32:09,539
No, it's...

388
00:32:09,539 --> 00:32:11,439
I'm sorry for interrupting,

389
00:32:11,559 --> 00:32:12,779
but it's just very interesting

390
00:32:12,779 --> 00:32:14,319
having you walk through that.

391
00:32:14,419 --> 00:32:16,699
It's making some headlines

392
00:32:16,699 --> 00:32:19,839
and thoughts I've had become much clearer.

393
00:32:20,399 --> 00:32:21,779
You mentioned stable coins earlier.

394
00:32:21,779 --> 00:32:32,699
Obviously, the expedience with which the Genius Act got passed here in the United States makes a lot of sense in retrospect, considering they're looking for buyers of the of the bills.

395
00:32:32,699 --> 00:32:58,479
But then on top of that, as it relates to Bitcoin and stablecoin specifically, I think another change that's been made this year that many people still aren't paying enough attention to is the sort of the elimination of SAB 121, which had some very strict and reserve requirements for any bank that was going to hold Bitcoin or other altcoins.

396
00:32:58,479 --> 00:33:00,459
and they changed that to SAV-122.

397
00:33:00,679 --> 00:33:03,639
So now banks can take Bitcoin as collateral if they want.

398
00:33:03,739 --> 00:33:08,619
And going back to your point of the system is very collateral dependent,

399
00:33:08,799 --> 00:33:11,819
it seems like they're trying to open up as many gates as possible

400
00:33:11,819 --> 00:33:14,759
to stuff new types of collateral into the system.

401
00:33:15,459 --> 00:33:16,659
Yeah, I think that's right.

402
00:33:16,759 --> 00:33:21,819
I mean, I think the thing is that stablecoin are a great mechanism

403
00:33:21,819 --> 00:33:25,519
to buy treasuries, to buy bills in particular, to help fund the treasury.

404
00:33:25,519 --> 00:33:31,459
But it basically creates a sort of, if you like, from the Treasury's point of view, a kind of virtual circle.

405
00:33:32,239 --> 00:33:46,339
And the reason for that is if you think back to sort of monetary economics, what happens is if a credit provider basically buys a government debt, any government debt, they monetize the government debt.

406
00:33:46,399 --> 00:33:47,719
So it's effectively printing money.

407
00:33:47,719 --> 00:33:54,259
And the fact is that if you're issuing lots of bills or short-dated debt, that's really

408
00:33:54,259 --> 00:33:55,799
attractive to credit providers.

409
00:33:56,759 --> 00:34:00,339
And this is what the banks essentially hoover up.

410
00:34:00,919 --> 00:34:06,579
So what you can see in the data right now is that looking at the growth of bank balance

411
00:34:06,579 --> 00:34:10,639
sheets, it's being driven a lot by purchases of government debt.

412
00:34:11,199 --> 00:34:12,258
This is monetization.

413
00:34:12,999 --> 00:34:16,779
So what we're doing is we're embarking down the route of monetary inflation.

414
00:34:16,779 --> 00:34:21,679
I mean, these are the fears that everyone's got. And that monetary inflation is ultimately going

415
00:34:21,679 --> 00:34:26,859
to come through in terms of devaluing people's wealth or just increasing the cost of living.

416
00:34:27,379 --> 00:34:31,339
And so what you need is dedicated monetary inflation hedges. And that means gold,

417
00:34:31,459 --> 00:34:37,239
it means Bitcoin, et cetera. And I think the whole, I mean, Bitcoin, in my view, is definitely

418
00:34:37,239 --> 00:34:44,619
the future. And I think that the US officially has to endorse that pretty quickly before somebody

419
00:34:44,619 --> 00:34:49,779
else does. And I think that if the US wants to maintain control of the global financial system

420
00:34:49,779 --> 00:34:56,439
of the dollar, it makes every sense to get on board with Bitcoin pretty quickly. Because what

421
00:34:56,439 --> 00:35:04,199
would happen if China did, for example? I think it would be important to get that staking quickly.

422
00:35:05,239 --> 00:35:12,579
Completely agree. And I'm just looking for a tweet that sort of validates exactly what you just said.

423
00:35:12,579 --> 00:35:18,459
And Luke Roman has been paying attention to the sort of squabbling between the U.S. and China specifically.

424
00:35:18,719 --> 00:35:27,599
And he tweeted out, I'm not sure if you caught this headline this week, but it seems like China wants to get a digital yuan stable coin out there.

425
00:35:27,599 --> 00:35:30,419
And Luke just posited earlier this morning.

426
00:35:30,519 --> 00:35:39,659
So what happens when China launches 0% yielding yuan stable coins backed by finite gold to compete with 0% yielding USD stable coins backed by infinity bills?

427
00:35:39,659 --> 00:35:44,339
will the reaction of the USD stablecoin proponents mirror the seven-minute abs guy

428
00:35:44,339 --> 00:35:48,639
from something about Mary? And I think he's alluding to, are they going to have to back it

429
00:35:48,639 --> 00:35:53,419
with Bitcoin? Yeah, very sensible. I mean, he's had some great calls in the past, yeah.

430
00:35:53,419 --> 00:36:03,359
Yeah. And I want to take a step back and just, you having been in the markets for decades and

431
00:36:03,359 --> 00:36:09,079
looking at this, going back to the scene wave, the 65-month trends, what's driving that? Is it more

432
00:36:09,079 --> 00:36:16,639
sociological human nature, whereas a mechanical based purely off the duration of debt that's

433
00:36:16,639 --> 00:36:16,939
issued?

434
00:36:17,499 --> 00:36:17,979
Is it mechanical?

435
00:36:18,339 --> 00:36:19,919
Well, it's a great question.

436
00:36:19,919 --> 00:36:24,219
I mean, I can't do the question justice with a decent answer.

437
00:36:24,719 --> 00:36:32,939
But my answer is that if you look at the frequency of that cycle, it pretty much is in line with

438
00:36:32,939 --> 00:36:36,319
the average maturity of debt in the world economy.

439
00:36:36,319 --> 00:36:43,579
so you know the average the cycle fluctuates with a five to six year frequency and that's pretty much

440
00:36:43,579 --> 00:36:47,879
the average maturity of debt out there about five to six years so that would kind of make sense so

441
00:36:47,879 --> 00:36:54,819
it's a debt refinancing cycle yeah and that was just i had a hunch that was going to be your answer

442
00:36:54,819 --> 00:37:01,519
and if that is the case like do we have to rethink is there the potential to rethink how we're

443
00:37:01,519 --> 00:37:06,019
issuing debt to rethink duration does it make sense or is this just the way what it would

444
00:37:06,019 --> 00:37:11,739
basically say that if we're changing the tenor, the average tenor of debt out there, we're going

445
00:37:11,739 --> 00:37:16,499
to change the average tenor of the cycle. So you're going to get shorter cycles if we're doing

446
00:37:16,499 --> 00:37:22,799
more debt issuance. And you can see the logic in that, how that would work, is if the Treasury is

447
00:37:22,799 --> 00:37:28,059
always issuing three-month, six-month bills, they're always going to have a big problem every

448
00:37:28,059 --> 00:37:33,019
three to six months when you effectively get a roll or if that debt is bunched and you get a roll.

449
00:37:33,019 --> 00:37:41,159
yeah and then now my mind's wandering too like does this like the reintroduction of patient

450
00:37:41,159 --> 00:37:47,359
capital like long term like did like you mentioned it earlier too like this transition to hard assets

451
00:37:47,359 --> 00:37:52,359
is this how it happens you just have a sort of not even asymptotic but you just have a

452
00:37:52,919 --> 00:37:59,399
accelerating sort of market turnover because you're getting shorter and shorter on the curve

453
00:37:59,399 --> 00:38:04,879
as you as refinance the debt, that at some point the system needs to transition to something else.

454
00:38:06,839 --> 00:38:11,758
Yeah, I think that makes sense. I also think that an interesting thought experiment

455
00:38:11,758 --> 00:38:17,319
is just to say, well, what would happen in the world if there are only two assets that you could

456
00:38:17,319 --> 00:38:22,339
invest in? You could only invest in short-dated government debt, or you could invest in Bitcoin.

457
00:38:22,339 --> 00:38:32,619
what would happen? And you could see under that situation that you would get Bitcoin moving with

458
00:38:32,619 --> 00:38:39,419
the financial sector 100%. And whenever there was expansions of liquidity, investors would

459
00:38:39,419 --> 00:38:44,779
basically take on more risk and put more money into Bitcoin. And so you could see Bitcoin being

460
00:38:44,779 --> 00:38:51,019
highly, highly pro-cyclical with the liquidity cycle. Now, the reason I cite that is that a lot

461
00:38:51,019 --> 00:38:56,439
people look at macroeconomic fundamentals, in other words, what's happening in the real economy,

462
00:38:56,758 --> 00:39:02,279
to judge what's happening in the equity markets. Right now, what you've got is a situation which

463
00:39:02,279 --> 00:39:07,659
is a great paradox. It doesn't seem to be any cycle in the real economy. The economic data is

464
00:39:07,659 --> 00:39:12,699
kind of blowing two or three different ways. No one really knows, are we in a boom or a bust or

465
00:39:12,699 --> 00:39:18,619
whatever it may be. But if you look at the markets, they're performing just as if it's a very,

466
00:39:18,619 --> 00:39:23,299
very normal cycle. And I'll demonstrate that because I think it's an interesting point

467
00:39:23,299 --> 00:39:31,299
to ponder. And let me just try and show you what I mean by that. And this means sort of coming back

468
00:39:31,299 --> 00:39:40,519
to, in fact, this diagram. So if you think about the cycle here, so let's put that into a framework

469
00:39:40,519 --> 00:39:47,879
and think about the asset allocation cycle, which I'm about to show here. So this is showing that

470
00:39:47,879 --> 00:39:55,879
schematic cycle. So what you have on the left-hand side is what asset classes tend to do well as the

471
00:39:55,879 --> 00:40:01,539
liquidity cycle is evolving. And on the right-hand side, we basically describe the phases of the

472
00:40:01,539 --> 00:40:07,859
liquidity cycle as we understand them. Now, what this broadly says is that in the upswing of the

473
00:40:07,859 --> 00:40:14,839
cycle, you want equities. This is traditional asset classes. Bitcoin is a risk on asset. So it

474
00:40:14,839 --> 00:40:20,319
generally does well when you're in the upswing. And in theory, it should do not so well if you're

475
00:40:20,319 --> 00:40:26,939
in the downswing. We have a lot of evidence of a downswing of late, but we'll see. Commodities

476
00:40:26,939 --> 00:40:33,758
around the top, then cash on the way down, bonds at the trough. And this is how that translates

477
00:40:33,758 --> 00:40:39,779
into different asset classes and different industry groups. Now, bear in mind what I just

478
00:40:39,779 --> 00:40:44,579
said about the fact that there's no business cycle, or it's really difficult to perceive a

479
00:40:44,579 --> 00:40:48,999
business cycle right now, because the data is blowing in so many different directions. No one

480
00:40:48,999 --> 00:40:55,059
really knows. Is it recession? Is it recovery? Who knows? But if you look at the cycle of market,

481
00:40:55,219 --> 00:41:01,159
the market cycle, it's absolutely normal. So if you're in the rebound stage of the liquidity cycle,

482
00:41:01,299 --> 00:41:07,159
so think of assets on the left and industry group sectors of the S&P, let's say, on the right-hand

483
00:41:07,159 --> 00:41:12,519
side. If you're in the rebound area, which is the early phase of the cycle, so that was basically

484
00:41:12,519 --> 00:41:20,359
2023 or thereabouts, maybe to mid-24, then you were looking at equities doing well, credits doing

485
00:41:20,359 --> 00:41:27,299
well, commodities not so well, bond duration, forget it, bad. As you move towards calm, you want

486
00:41:27,299 --> 00:41:33,659
equities, you want to start to migrate your credits more into commodities and stay away from bond

487
00:41:33,659 --> 00:41:39,199
duration. And then you can see how that cycle migrates from left to right. And then if you

488
00:41:39,199 --> 00:41:44,059
look at industry groups, then you say, well, in rebound, what I want is just I want cyclicals,

489
00:41:44,079 --> 00:41:49,939
but I really want tech. That's the strong outperformer. Then you get to calm. Tech still

490
00:41:49,939 --> 00:41:55,739
does quite well. But you start to get financials coming through and energy where you look at the

491
00:41:55,739 --> 00:42:00,159
yield curve steepening, as you'd expect now. Commodity stocks are beginning to get a bid.

492
00:42:00,159 --> 00:42:06,999
financials around the world. Look at European banks have been on fire. JPM's up quite a lot

493
00:42:06,999 --> 00:42:12,299
in the US already. It's still a bit lately, but it's had a good performer over the last 12 months.

494
00:42:12,899 --> 00:42:18,639
Regional banks are doing pretty well again. So you're looking at financials, energy commodities

495
00:42:18,639 --> 00:42:25,179
doing well. So this seems to be a really, really normal cycle when it comes to market movements

496
00:42:25,179 --> 00:42:29,559
and liquidity. But you can't pick that up from the real economy right now.

497
00:42:30,159 --> 00:42:38,399
No. Now, there seems to be a very stark disconnection from financial markets and the real economy, at least here in the United States.

498
00:42:38,399 --> 00:42:46,479
And you have the Silicon Valley crowd really beating the drum about this A.I. wave being a boon to productivity.

499
00:42:46,859 --> 00:42:59,339
And that's why we're seeing profit margins increase without any new hiring at a bunch of the Mag seven companies, particularly Meta, Google, Microsoft.

500
00:42:59,339 --> 00:43:06,339
And I think that's what's making me cautiously, I mean, just cautious.

501
00:43:06,339 --> 00:43:22,468
Generally I don even want to say cautiously optimistic is that real or is it a bunch of people with very high incentive to beat that drum trying to will it into existence And I think that something even within the Trump administration

502
00:43:22,608 --> 00:43:26,748
I think David Sachs and others that are more tech forward within the

503
00:43:26,748 --> 00:43:28,048
administration are saying, Hey,

504
00:43:28,128 --> 00:43:31,288
we have this window of opportunity to really take advantage of this,

505
00:43:31,288 --> 00:43:37,428
this step change, improvement and productivity across the economy.

506
00:43:37,428 --> 00:43:40,028
And I think that's a lot of people are,

507
00:43:40,028 --> 00:43:48,748
We're just in this extremely uncertain period of time due to where we are from a debt situation, where the liquidity is.

508
00:43:49,028 --> 00:43:54,388
And then on top of that, you have this compounding external factor of this new technology.

509
00:43:55,588 --> 00:43:55,608
Yeah.

510
00:43:56,048 --> 00:44:04,008
Yeah, I guess, Marty, what I'm saying in a way is to look, if the financial markets have got no strong connection with the real economy,

511
00:44:04,608 --> 00:44:16,888
What you're getting is potentially a threat because you're getting, as I said, a trillion dollars coming out of the markets over the next, well, this year and next year because of tech investment spending.

512
00:44:17,408 --> 00:44:18,868
And that's a lot of cash.

513
00:44:18,868 --> 00:44:19,668
Yeah.

514
00:44:19,668 --> 00:44:26,168
Yeah, there's a lot to chew on here.

515
00:44:26,168 --> 00:44:34,948
Because it's having only been observing financial markets very closely since the great financial crisis.

516
00:44:34,948 --> 00:44:37,088
Like I've seen a couple of these cycles.

517
00:44:37,188 --> 00:44:43,288
And to my point earlier, it does seem like things are accelerating and the cycles are shortening.

518
00:44:43,288 --> 00:44:56,108
I mean, 08 to the European credit crisis in the early 2010s, then obviously COVID 2020, banking crisis of 23.

519
00:44:56,628 --> 00:44:57,788
And now here we are today.

520
00:44:57,928 --> 00:45:00,708
It seems like we're in a precarious situation yet again.

521
00:45:04,668 --> 00:45:10,688
I don't really have a point there, but I'm just like trying to think through this of where it ends.

522
00:45:10,688 --> 00:45:15,128
And so in terms of Bitcoin, that's something I wrote in the newsletter this morning, too.

523
00:45:15,288 --> 00:45:27,208
Like if more and more people are observing these cycles compressing and getting more extreme in terms of the response to any downturn in terms as it relates to money printing and debt issuance.

524
00:45:27,208 --> 00:45:48,588
I wonder Bitcoin being 16 years old, like does the muscle memory get to a point where if there is another downturn, people wake up and say, all right, it's obvious that something's wrong in the traditional financial system with these boom and bust cycles.

525
00:45:48,948 --> 00:45:54,568
This alternative here in Bitcoin is completely separate from that in many regards.

526
00:45:54,568 --> 00:45:58,988
and historically it's been a risk-on asset.

527
00:45:59,268 --> 00:46:02,188
Do you see it potentially transitioning to risk-off?

528
00:46:03,788 --> 00:46:06,168
I think it's a very interesting point.

529
00:46:06,168 --> 00:46:13,228
I think the thing is that, look, the plain fact is that you've got a trend

530
00:46:13,228 --> 00:46:15,328
and you've got a cycle to contend with.

531
00:46:15,808 --> 00:46:21,888
And I think there is a liquidity cycle which essentially is driving the ups

532
00:46:21,888 --> 00:46:26,788
and downs short term in Bitcoin makes a lot of sense because it's a very liquidity sensitive asset

533
00:46:26,788 --> 00:46:30,868
because it responds to monetary inflation. And that's what we've got through the cycle.

534
00:46:30,868 --> 00:46:36,548
But we've got a trend, an exponential trend, which is basically debt driven, which means that

535
00:46:36,548 --> 00:46:42,308
over the long term, just because of interest rate compounding, not least the fact that you've got a

536
00:46:42,308 --> 00:46:48,088
positive primary deficit as well, adding to that debt burden. But the interest payments and the

537
00:46:48,088 --> 00:46:54,628
primary deficit mean that debt is growing exponentially, liquidity has to keep pace with

538
00:46:54,628 --> 00:47:00,568
that. So what people are not really understanding, as far as I can see, is that what has really

539
00:47:00,568 --> 00:47:06,688
changed post-COVID, in particular, is that the debt burden is just growing at a much, much faster

540
00:47:06,688 --> 00:47:11,928
pace. And it's really difficult, particularly with aging demographics and the need for defense

541
00:47:11,928 --> 00:47:18,288
spending, et cetera, to actually to rein that in in any way, shape or form. So what you've got to

542
00:47:18,288 --> 00:47:22,948
do is you've effectively got to monetize that or at least keep place with liquidity. And therefore,

543
00:47:22,948 --> 00:47:27,968
you've got to have monetary inflation hedges in your portfolio. And that's why Bitcoin makes so

544
00:47:27,968 --> 00:47:33,028
much sense in the long term. And what I would say on top of that is it's a strategic asset.

545
00:47:33,568 --> 00:47:38,208
So that kind of lends its way to your point about being, is it going to be accepted more as a safe

546
00:47:38,208 --> 00:47:44,748
investment. Yes, I think it will be for sure. Because outside of the domain of central banks

547
00:47:44,748 --> 00:47:51,168
and governments, absolutely. But you've got to think about the growth of Bitcoin in terms of

548
00:47:51,168 --> 00:47:56,888
both the intensive margin and the extensive margin. And in terms of the intensive margin,

549
00:47:57,008 --> 00:48:02,088
let's call that the liquidity cycle. And let's call the extensive margin the fact that you've

550
00:48:02,088 --> 00:48:08,188
got more and more and more people who are going to embrace this asset over time. And that's what

551
00:48:08,188 --> 00:48:12,488
it's going to give it a lot of its trend growth. So I think if you look at it through those two

552
00:48:12,488 --> 00:48:20,948
lenses, you can put it into context more easily. Yeah. That's a fascinating time to be alive.

553
00:48:21,488 --> 00:48:25,528
I've said this many times in the last few months, it's equally unnerving and exhilarating

554
00:48:25,528 --> 00:48:31,848
because of everything going on. Untrodden ground. Yeah, it really is.

555
00:48:31,848 --> 00:48:33,868
in the last

556
00:48:33,868 --> 00:48:36,068
the last topic you mentioned

557
00:48:36,068 --> 00:48:38,028
in the beginning I meant to follow up

558
00:48:38,028 --> 00:48:39,348
I forgot but I think it is

559
00:48:39,348 --> 00:48:41,608
something that could be worthwhile

560
00:48:41,608 --> 00:48:44,048
you alluded to China's

561
00:48:44,048 --> 00:48:45,628
sort of influence on

562
00:48:45,628 --> 00:48:46,908
the liquidity cycle

563
00:48:46,908 --> 00:48:49,728
not necessarily throwing a wrench

564
00:48:49,728 --> 00:48:51,648
but obviously having an impact

565
00:48:51,648 --> 00:48:53,828
in a certain way what is China doing

566
00:48:53,828 --> 00:48:54,468
that's

567
00:48:54,468 --> 00:48:57,848
let me just shift on to what's going on

568
00:48:57,848 --> 00:48:58,268
in China

569
00:48:58,268 --> 00:49:00,568
I'll allude to that

570
00:49:00,568 --> 00:49:04,308
Okay, let me just swing out of here.

571
00:49:04,508 --> 00:49:09,308
This is through the bond markets to where we are, dollar, China.

572
00:49:11,028 --> 00:49:15,668
So in terms of China, this is looking at the Chinese bond market.

573
00:49:16,268 --> 00:49:17,868
Every bond market tells a story.

574
00:49:18,168 --> 00:49:22,888
And what you've got here in the Chinese bond market, yellow line or orange line is looking

575
00:49:22,888 --> 00:49:28,168
at 10-year yields, and the black line is the term premium or risk premium on Chinese bonds.

576
00:49:28,168 --> 00:49:35,788
The fact that the black line is going down and it's pulling down the orange light is saying that you've got a big rush for safety in China.

577
00:49:36,228 --> 00:49:38,368
Investors are basically going for safe assets.

578
00:49:38,968 --> 00:49:42,168
Now, that black line, which had been going down, is stabilizing.

579
00:49:43,328 --> 00:49:49,668
And that stabilization is a good thing because it's basically telling us that we've probably reached a floor in yields.

580
00:49:49,868 --> 00:49:57,848
And what you're seeing now is probably a switch of assets among Chinese investors into more risk assets.

581
00:49:57,848 --> 00:50:04,948
So the Shanghai index has begun to pick up quite noticeably. Now, the reason that that is going on

582
00:50:04,948 --> 00:50:13,448
is that, if I can shift to my next slide, this is what China needs to do. So this is the debt

583
00:50:13,448 --> 00:50:20,368
liquidity ratio in China. And what I said is that if you look at different countries, they need

584
00:50:20,368 --> 00:50:25,588
stability in their debt liquidity ratio. If you've got a very high debt liquidity ratio,

585
00:50:25,968 --> 00:50:30,868
You've got refinancing problems in your debt markets, and you face debt deflation effectively.

586
00:50:31,228 --> 00:50:32,208
That's what China's got.

587
00:50:32,288 --> 00:50:33,988
That's what the bond market has been telling us.

588
00:50:34,248 --> 00:50:36,788
So they've got to get their debt liquidity ratio down.

589
00:50:37,148 --> 00:50:38,648
You do that in one of two ways.

590
00:50:38,648 --> 00:50:39,828
You default your debt.

591
00:50:40,368 --> 00:50:44,348
No financial system can afford to default debt because debt is collateral.

592
00:50:44,848 --> 00:50:46,168
So you can't do that.

593
00:50:46,508 --> 00:50:47,728
You've got to increase liquidity.

594
00:50:48,328 --> 00:50:50,308
And so they've got to start printing money.

595
00:50:50,748 --> 00:50:52,268
And that's broadly what they've been doing.

596
00:50:52,708 --> 00:50:54,848
Probably this chart is a better one to show it.

597
00:50:54,848 --> 00:50:58,548
This is looking at the amount of money going through Chinese money markets.

598
00:50:59,048 --> 00:51:02,268
And you can see the increases and decreases in that.

599
00:51:03,088 --> 00:51:07,888
Basically, what they've done is they've had two or three goes of actually injecting large

600
00:51:07,888 --> 00:51:09,788
amounts of liquidity into their markets.

601
00:51:10,028 --> 00:51:16,268
I've shown a year on year change because there is huge seasonality in Chinese money markets

602
00:51:16,268 --> 00:51:21,868
to a very large extent because China is still very much an agricultural economy or has large

603
00:51:21,868 --> 00:51:23,288
agricultural elements.

604
00:51:23,288 --> 00:51:27,288
And so there's a lot of seasonality in terms of the money flows in the markets.

605
00:51:27,448 --> 00:51:29,548
But you've still got that issue.

606
00:51:29,848 --> 00:51:32,508
So I've looked at it cleanly here in year-on-year changes.

607
00:51:33,248 --> 00:51:35,788
Why was 2024 so depressed?

608
00:51:36,028 --> 00:51:40,588
Because what was happening was the Chinese were trying to shadow a strong dollar, and

609
00:51:40,588 --> 00:51:41,468
they couldn't do it.

610
00:51:41,868 --> 00:51:47,368
And what they've done really since the beginning of 2025 is to throw the towel in, helped by

611
00:51:47,368 --> 00:51:49,648
the fact that the dollar took a little bit of a respite.

612
00:51:49,868 --> 00:51:52,548
So they put a lot of liquidity into markets.

613
00:51:52,968 --> 00:51:53,888
That is important.

614
00:51:54,468 --> 00:51:56,628
We need to see them keeping that up.

615
00:51:57,328 --> 00:52:02,588
The last four weeks have been a little bit mixed, so it's difficult to know the direction.

616
00:52:03,148 --> 00:52:05,988
But I was very encouraged at the beginning of the year.

617
00:52:06,388 --> 00:52:08,388
I'm still moderately optimistic.

618
00:52:08,988 --> 00:52:13,488
But the Chinese market has been a strong outperformer this year, and it may end up being one of

619
00:52:13,488 --> 00:52:16,468
the strongest markets for the year as a whole.

620
00:52:17,008 --> 00:52:19,688
This is just looking at the evidence of what they're doing.

621
00:52:19,688 --> 00:52:24,608
But I want to show this chart and the next one as a conclusion.

622
00:52:25,168 --> 00:52:28,448
This orange line is really what you've got to try and monitor.

623
00:52:29,028 --> 00:52:31,268
This is the yuan gold price.

624
00:52:31,908 --> 00:52:34,968
The black line is the yuan US dollar cross rate.

625
00:52:35,468 --> 00:52:38,768
Now, everyone in the market seems to be focused on the black line.

626
00:52:39,548 --> 00:52:42,788
And they like the stability that you see.

627
00:52:42,788 --> 00:52:48,908
They're around 7.1, 7.2, 7.3 renminbi per US dollar.

628
00:52:48,908 --> 00:52:50,748
But that's fine, OK?

629
00:52:51,148 --> 00:52:55,388
But behind the scenes, you've missed a lot of what's been happening in the gold market.

630
00:52:56,108 --> 00:53:00,628
And the Chinese gold price has absolutely skyrocketed.

631
00:53:01,088 --> 00:53:02,988
Now, gold everywhere, I know, has gone up.

632
00:53:02,988 --> 00:53:08,108
But the key point here is that I think this is a deliberate move because it reflects the

633
00:53:08,108 --> 00:53:10,468
monetization that's going on in the Chinese economy.

634
00:53:11,248 --> 00:53:13,568
And China is the world's biggest producer of gold.

635
00:53:14,428 --> 00:53:17,708
They obviously are accumulating gold internationally.

636
00:53:17,708 --> 00:53:23,728
They buy it. Anyone that wants to, any government that's selling, the Chinese are normally buying it.

637
00:53:24,008 --> 00:53:29,848
So they're accumulating gold. As a Chinese citizen, you can hold as much gold as you want,

638
00:53:30,068 --> 00:53:35,788
but you can't export it. So it's a natural hedge for people in terms of that economy.

639
00:53:36,468 --> 00:53:41,208
And the Shanghai gold market is really the leader now worldwide. It's the marginal pricer.

640
00:53:41,628 --> 00:53:44,608
So if you want to know what's going to happen to the gold price, in my view,

641
00:53:44,608 --> 00:53:49,248
What you need to do is to understand the dynamics in the Chinese monetary system,

642
00:53:49,608 --> 00:53:55,368
the fact they're monetizing and devaluing their real assets against, sorry, devaluing

643
00:53:55,368 --> 00:53:57,348
paper money against real assets.

644
00:53:57,628 --> 00:53:59,368
And a real asset here is gold.

645
00:53:59,768 --> 00:54:02,668
So they want to get paper money debts down.

646
00:54:02,848 --> 00:54:04,788
They print lots of money to do that.

647
00:54:05,028 --> 00:54:09,768
And what you see that evidenced through is a rising yuan gold price.

648
00:54:09,768 --> 00:54:16,508
Now, our view last year was that that had to get to a minimum of 24,000 yuan to make

649
00:54:16,508 --> 00:54:20,728
any dent or scratch in the debt problems that China has.

650
00:54:20,788 --> 00:54:21,448
It's got there.

651
00:54:21,708 --> 00:54:23,008
They've held it there lately.

652
00:54:23,228 --> 00:54:25,028
But I think it's going to have another jump up.

653
00:54:25,348 --> 00:54:26,668
So I'm very optimistic of gold.

654
00:54:26,768 --> 00:54:29,048
And if I'm optimistic of gold, I've got to be optimistic of Bitcoin.

655
00:54:29,568 --> 00:54:30,608
So that's the backdrop.

656
00:54:31,188 --> 00:54:38,068
But whereas the Federal Reserve has its major leverage on the financial systems worldwide

657
00:54:38,068 --> 00:54:44,328
and on financial assets. China's People's Bank has its major leverage really on the real economy

658
00:54:44,328 --> 00:54:50,948
because the Chinese economy is so controlled by the PBOC. And secondly, it's got a big economic

659
00:54:50,948 --> 00:54:57,308
footprint worldwide and regionally. And this chart, the next one, shows movements in Chinese

660
00:54:57,308 --> 00:55:04,228
liquidity against world commodity prices. The orange line is Chinese liquidity. We've

661
00:55:04,228 --> 00:55:12,148
extrapolated that is shown as an index of liquidity impulses. So that's showing data from 2004 onwards.

662
00:55:12,748 --> 00:55:18,228
The orange line is just showing there's potentially another big inflow coming. I mean, that's partly

663
00:55:18,228 --> 00:55:24,488
guesswork or projection, but that's what I think is going on. And the black line, solid, is all

664
00:55:24,488 --> 00:55:31,008
commodity prices of the CRB index. And the dotted black line is X energy. So just to show there's no

665
00:55:31,008 --> 00:55:37,548
bias with oil prices, but that shows the picture. So what it says is, if you're going to get a lot

666
00:55:37,548 --> 00:55:42,288
of Chinese liquidity expansion, you're going to get commodity markets up, but you're going to get

667
00:55:42,288 --> 00:55:47,108
the gold price up. But that's quite consistent because gold typically moves about six to nine

668
00:55:47,108 --> 00:55:52,188
months before commodity markets do. And that's what we're expecting.

669
00:55:53,888 --> 00:55:59,848
Yeah. I imagine terrorists are really accelerating this since they're on gas on this fire as well.

670
00:55:59,848 --> 00:56:05,688
Yeah, because the Chinese economy is suffering really badly from the tariff heights.

671
00:56:06,248 --> 00:56:06,348
Yeah.

672
00:56:07,148 --> 00:56:15,148
And then the way I understand it, the capital flows historically up until recently,

673
00:56:15,368 --> 00:56:21,708
with Trippin's dilemma hollowed out, our manufacturing base export it to the rest of the world,

674
00:56:21,988 --> 00:56:25,088
buy their goods, and then they take the cash that we buy those goods with

675
00:56:25,088 --> 00:56:27,128
and pump it back into our financial markets.

676
00:56:27,128 --> 00:56:29,768
And there's some disruption in that flow, right?

677
00:56:29,848 --> 00:56:38,988
out too um yeah again equally unnerving and exhilarating uh if you like to nerd out about

678
00:56:38,988 --> 00:56:44,808
this stuff and michael i can't thank you enough for spending an hour on your friday uh early

679
00:56:44,808 --> 00:56:49,288
evening to uh to walk through this with me this is a great question marty thank you the pleasure

680
00:56:49,288 --> 00:56:55,168
is all mine sir this is um incredibly illuminating and high signal content so thank you for putting

681
00:56:55,168 --> 00:57:02,728
it together um anybody's listening to this who's not subscribed uh to cross border to michael's

682
00:57:02,728 --> 00:57:09,488
sub stack go uh go subscribe it's incredible and it's called capital wars by the way yeah capital

683
00:57:09,488 --> 00:57:16,568
wars you guys did a collaboration with the bitcoin layer um team earlier this week nick batia

684
00:57:16,568 --> 00:57:20,028
crew that was really good i really liked the bitcoin color in that one

685
00:57:20,028 --> 00:57:20,748
yeah

686
00:57:20,748 --> 00:57:22,988
yeah that was a good Q&A

687
00:57:22,988 --> 00:57:24,648
awesome

688
00:57:24,648 --> 00:57:25,068
well

689
00:57:25,068 --> 00:57:25,988
I'll let you

690
00:57:25,988 --> 00:57:27,188
enjoy your Friday night

691
00:57:27,188 --> 00:57:27,528
hopefully

692
00:57:27,528 --> 00:57:29,148
we can do this again

693
00:57:29,148 --> 00:57:29,788
maybe we'll

694
00:57:29,788 --> 00:57:30,808
maybe we'll meet

695
00:57:30,808 --> 00:57:31,688
at the peak of the cycle

696
00:57:31,688 --> 00:57:32,228
at some point

697
00:57:32,228 --> 00:57:32,848
in the next six

698
00:57:32,848 --> 00:57:33,768
to nine months

699
00:57:33,768 --> 00:57:35,208
yeah

700
00:57:35,208 --> 00:57:36,308
I just hope it's a way off

701
00:57:36,308 --> 00:57:36,728
but anyway

702
00:57:36,728 --> 00:57:38,128
look forward to the next

703
00:57:38,128 --> 00:57:38,728
engagement party

704
00:57:38,728 --> 00:57:39,428
thank you

705
00:57:39,428 --> 00:57:39,728
alright

706
00:57:39,728 --> 00:57:40,528
have a good one

707
00:57:40,528 --> 00:57:41,268
peace and love freaks

708
00:57:41,268 --> 00:57:41,668
okay