1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:06,260
John, we missed a week. Memorial Day really threw a wrench in our scheduling and we couldn't make it up Tuesday.

2
00:00:06,460 --> 00:00:07,340
So we're back.

3
00:00:07,780 --> 00:00:15,460
Yeah, it's a real shame. We brought shame on our households relative to your unbroken streak with Odell on RHR.

4
00:00:15,960 --> 00:00:19,040
Maybe we'll start our streak today going forward.

5
00:00:19,600 --> 00:00:24,120
Yeah, we had a Friday RHR last week. Matt's feeling a little bearish.

6
00:00:24,120 --> 00:00:31,220
I feel like he's a little bearish right now, which is usually a good sign for the near-term prospects of the Bitcoin price.

7
00:00:31,400 --> 00:00:37,420
Though we have drifted a bit lower since we've recorded on Friday, currently below $72,000.

8
00:00:37,700 --> 00:00:40,360
But I think Bitcoin's in an interesting spot.

9
00:00:40,480 --> 00:00:48,740
We're going to, I think, end this conversation on the fundamental value prop of Bitcoin and some developments that have happened in recent weeks.

10
00:00:48,740 --> 00:00:54,180
But first, I think jumping right into it, just talking about the mimetic power of this administration.

11
00:00:54,560 --> 00:01:12,180
And you wanted to start off this week's presentation with the juxtaposition of President Trump and Jerome Powell from last year's audit of the building of the new Federal Reserve building and Secretary of Assent presenting the $250 bill with President Trump on it.

12
00:01:12,180 --> 00:01:18,600
Yeah, look, I mean, this guy, you know, much can be said about him, positive and negative.

13
00:01:19,180 --> 00:01:21,060
And, you know, we don't have time to get into all that.

14
00:01:21,180 --> 00:01:31,260
But I think the one thing that we all have to agree on is that Trump across his two administrations is responsible for some of the most iconic images of the storied history of this great country.

15
00:01:32,260 --> 00:01:36,980
And, you know, the one on the right, the Besson image is what I led off the week with,

16
00:01:37,120 --> 00:01:42,660
just because I think it so perfectly captures the moment and also the contrast between what

17
00:01:42,660 --> 00:01:45,1000
happened last year with his iconic image of Trump and Powell, which I think is probably

18
00:01:45,1000 --> 00:01:48,080
the number one image that Trump will ever produce.

19
00:01:48,200 --> 00:01:50,380
I mean, I just I don't think you can get better than this.

20
00:01:50,920 --> 00:01:54,880
But a strong number two is this one with Besson holding up his $250 bill.

21
00:01:55,220 --> 00:02:01,060
You know, you've got larger currency denominations, right, with people struggling with price

22
00:02:01,060 --> 00:02:05,880
inflation, that's always a good sign. You've got the Treasury secretary taking the diametric

23
00:02:05,880 --> 00:02:11,420
opposite stance relative to his former counterpart of the Fed as it relates to Trump.

24
00:02:11,960 --> 00:02:18,320
You know, clearly with this wonderful grin showing Trump's image on the currency,

25
00:02:18,580 --> 00:02:22,300
you know, I think tells you a lot where we're going, tells you a lot about where the different

26
00:02:22,300 --> 00:02:27,100
camps sit. And yeah, I just think this picture's worth a thousand words and I'll let it speak for

27
00:02:27,100 --> 00:02:32,800
itself. Yeah, when it gets to, I mean, we just did some pre-show prep, more pre-show prep than we

28
00:02:32,800 --> 00:02:37,880
typically do. And I think what I'm picking up is that the underlying theme of this discussion is

29
00:02:37,880 --> 00:02:42,940
going to be the acceleration of the K-shaped economy and how we navigate that moving forward,

30
00:02:43,020 --> 00:02:49,220
because it seems very clear that there is some dislocation between AI and the plays within AI

31
00:02:49,220 --> 00:02:54,400
and everything else. And it's just really interesting times that we live in, but sticking

32
00:02:54,400 --> 00:03:00,640
on geopolitics and the Trump administration. I think one thing that's become clear over the last

33
00:03:00,640 --> 00:03:06,560
week that a lot of the price action that we've seen in oil markets is going below 100 and staying

34
00:03:06,560 --> 00:03:13,720
in the mid 80s for the last few weeks has been manufactured price due to the fact that many

35
00:03:13,720 --> 00:03:20,220
nations are draining their strategic petroleum reserve as an attempt to route around the supply

36
00:03:20,220 --> 00:03:24,240
disruptions because of the closure of the straighter hermuz. Yeah. You know, and I think

37
00:03:24,240 --> 00:03:29,500
this relates to the K-shaped economy as well, right? Where we're all, you know, those of us who

38
00:03:29,500 --> 00:03:33,240
are, have the need to actually be aware of what, you know, gas prices are, you know, certainly have

39
00:03:33,240 --> 00:03:39,280
felt in the last six months, the impact of all the disruptions in a way that perhaps the,

40
00:03:39,480 --> 00:03:44,520
those at the top of the pyramid haven't quite as much, but it hasn't been, you know, completely

41
00:03:44,520 --> 00:03:48,860
unbearable yet. And I think there's a decent amount of confusion as to, you know, why we haven't

42
00:03:48,860 --> 00:03:51,960
blown out further. There's been speculation about this, and we've talked about it a little bit on

43
00:03:51,960 --> 00:03:56,840
the show, but Rory Johnston, who's a great oil analyst that everyone should follow, had some

44
00:03:56,840 --> 00:04:02,220
good data out highlighting that there's some incongruity in the Chinese data that they follow,

45
00:04:02,480 --> 00:04:08,080
suggesting that you've had oil imports come way down, but also mobility indicators that they

46
00:04:08,080 --> 00:04:12,920
follow are still strong. So you're not really seeing demand destruction. And he thinks that

47
00:04:12,920 --> 00:04:19,520
the delta there is getting backfilled by the Chinese effectively just making massive withdrawals

48
00:04:19,520 --> 00:04:23,120
from their petroleum reserve. He's kind of interpolating that. He doesn't have great data

49
00:04:23,120 --> 00:04:28,280
to that point, but it stands to reason. And of course, they're certainly not alone. All the cool

50
00:04:28,280 --> 00:04:32,260
kids are doing it and we're seeing it in the U.S. Last week, we just had our second highest

51
00:04:32,260 --> 00:04:40,080
SPR draw on record, surpassing the ones from 2022. Highest was the prior week. And then Japan also

52
00:04:40,080 --> 00:04:41,940
is running the same playbook here.

53
00:04:43,140 --> 00:04:44,660
And so this is keeping us, you know,

54
00:04:44,920 --> 00:04:47,540
keeping a relative lid on oil prices.

55
00:04:47,760 --> 00:04:50,500
You know, it hurts, but it's not destructive yet.

56
00:04:50,780 --> 00:04:52,400
For many sectors of the economy,

57
00:04:52,700 --> 00:04:53,700
it's not probably,

58
00:04:54,040 --> 00:04:56,380
it's getting to be a voting issue in the US,

59
00:04:56,380 --> 00:04:58,860
but it's not necessarily a rioting issue yet.

60
00:04:59,280 --> 00:05:01,020
But, you know, the question is

61
00:05:01,020 --> 00:05:03,460
that when you think about stocks and flows,

62
00:05:03,660 --> 00:05:04,860
like these are all stocks, right?

63
00:05:04,900 --> 00:05:08,060
And you deplete them without re-upping them.

64
00:05:08,180 --> 00:05:09,340
You can only do that so many times.

65
00:05:09,340 --> 00:05:11,960
and you can't even get them down to actually zero.

66
00:05:12,100 --> 00:05:13,600
You need to keep some level of stock in

67
00:05:13,600 --> 00:05:15,780
for the SPR to actually work chemically

68
00:05:15,780 --> 00:05:16,860
in function of the way that it should.

69
00:05:17,340 --> 00:05:18,540
So the question is,

70
00:05:18,720 --> 00:05:20,360
how many more times can we run that playbook

71
00:05:20,360 --> 00:05:23,380
before you start actually getting more meaningful,

72
00:05:23,680 --> 00:05:26,620
getting in the street type impacts on the oil price?

73
00:05:27,200 --> 00:05:30,420
Yeah, and I think last week was rather interesting

74
00:05:30,420 --> 00:05:33,040
as it pertains to this particular theme

75
00:05:33,040 --> 00:05:35,540
because you had the CEOs of Chevron and Exxon

76
00:05:35,540 --> 00:05:37,580
come out and basically call BS saying,

77
00:05:37,580 --> 00:05:40,660
hey, these prices are artificially manufactured.

78
00:05:41,120 --> 00:05:45,400
What we're looking at looks like the prices should increase throughout the summer,

79
00:05:45,500 --> 00:05:50,020
maybe getting back to the $150 to $160 per barrel range.

80
00:05:50,400 --> 00:05:52,720
And I mean, I was following WTI this morning.

81
00:05:52,800 --> 00:05:56,540
It looks like it popped above 91 from 85 over the weekend.

82
00:05:56,700 --> 00:06:00,300
I wouldn't be surprised if that's the market digesting to CEOs

83
00:06:00,300 --> 00:06:05,380
at two of the largest major oil producers in the world calling BS on this.

84
00:06:05,560 --> 00:06:06,040
Yeah.

85
00:06:06,040 --> 00:06:09,320
Yeah. The DJ in me looks at this chart and wants to call a lower high there.

86
00:06:10,880 --> 00:06:13,580
But I won't I won't make any bets to that effect.

87
00:06:14,040 --> 00:06:17,960
But yeah, look, this is obviously, you know, we talked about it for the last like three or four months.

88
00:06:17,960 --> 00:06:20,980
Like this is kind of the the crux of the whole thing. Right.

89
00:06:20,980 --> 00:06:37,320
is who blinks first, who can, you know, maintain enough stability in core input prices to their economies to not have to back off and to maintain leverage in this whole U.S. and China, you know, via Iran type of standoff that we're looking at.

90
00:06:37,800 --> 00:06:38,760
And it's TBD, right?

91
00:06:38,760 --> 00:06:43,1000
The Achilles heel over in the U.S. is that this has, when this price gets out of hand,

92
00:06:44,140 --> 00:06:48,780
that has direct and meaningful impacts, not just for voters who can ultimately in November

93
00:06:48,780 --> 00:06:53,140
potentially constrain Trump's agenda, but also more significantly and more immediately for bond

94
00:06:53,140 --> 00:06:58,580
yields, which flows through everything else. So in a hyper-financialized over-financialized

95
00:06:58,580 --> 00:07:03,760
economy, we've seen a couple of times that it seems like 4-5, 4-6 on the 10-year is maybe the

96
00:07:03,760 --> 00:07:08,660
place where you need to, where Treasury or somebody needs to step in and maybe Trump needs to fire off

97
00:07:08,660 --> 00:07:15,440
a positive tweet to keep the move volatility index at bay. We'll see if we need another one

98
00:07:15,440 --> 00:07:19,020
of those in a little while. But yeah, this is, without being able to make any clear calls,

99
00:07:19,400 --> 00:07:23,080
this is obviously the crux that everybody's got to focus on here in the next couple months.

100
00:07:23,820 --> 00:07:28,680
Yeah. I think what is more clear, at least to me, and it'd be interesting to get your

101
00:07:28,680 --> 00:07:34,400
perspective on this, is where it's easier to tell the signals in the AI play right now. The numbers

102
00:07:34,400 --> 00:07:37,880
coming out of this sector are absolutely mind-boggling.

103
00:07:38,160 --> 00:07:39,320
And you have it highlighted here.

104
00:07:39,380 --> 00:07:41,700
The Micron hit a trillion-dollar market cap for the first time.

105
00:07:42,420 --> 00:07:46,580
As stock surges 19%, and then Dell stock skyrocketed 32%

106
00:07:46,580 --> 00:07:50,580
for its best day ever as AI server revenue soars.

107
00:07:50,820 --> 00:07:52,080
And then I think on top of that,

108
00:07:52,140 --> 00:07:57,380
Dell released their first hydro-cooled GPU rack

109
00:07:57,380 --> 00:07:59,420
in conjunction with CoreWeave.

110
00:07:59,420 --> 00:08:01,440
And that was announced at the end of last week as well.

111
00:08:01,440 --> 00:08:04,620
So it seems like the infrastructure build out is happening.

112
00:08:04,800 --> 00:08:05,300
It's real.

113
00:08:05,760 --> 00:08:08,240
I know we've been talking behind the scenes using the tools.

114
00:08:08,520 --> 00:08:08,940
They're real.

115
00:08:09,340 --> 00:08:14,560
They're an incredible productivity gain for teams that know how to utilize them.

116
00:08:14,600 --> 00:08:19,980
And I think that's the most important thing to highlight here, that know how to utilize them, particularly in a cost efficient way.

117
00:08:19,980 --> 00:08:22,920
And again, going back to what we said earlier,

118
00:08:22,920 --> 00:08:24,880
we're in this very interesting time

119
00:08:24,880 --> 00:08:26,460
where you have this geopolitical strife,

120
00:08:26,460 --> 00:08:27,760
you have this K-shaped economy,

121
00:08:27,760 --> 00:08:29,960
and then you have this behemoth

122
00:08:29,960 --> 00:08:32,720
of an emerging market theme

123
00:08:32,720 --> 00:08:36,460
and what will be a part of human society moving forward,

124
00:08:36,460 --> 00:08:50,562
which is this AI build out on the infrastructure side and then the utilization on the software side that is happening at an insane pace Yeah The funny thing here about all this is like you know

125
00:08:50,582 --> 00:08:55,822
we had Intel, we had Cisco both, you know, up on a stick, blowout earnings, making new all-time

126
00:08:55,822 --> 00:09:00,742
highs. Now you've got Micron, you've got Dell. Like we're running it back with like the late

127
00:09:00,742 --> 00:09:05,682
90s stalwarts that really defined the original tech boom and tech bubble. The interesting thing

128
00:09:05,682 --> 00:09:09,542
though, is like for, for anybody out there who wants to just make kind of a lazy comparison and

129
00:09:09,542 --> 00:09:13,802
say, well, this is obviously just kind of running back, you know, that exact same trend and that

130
00:09:13,802 --> 00:09:18,722
exact same set of themes, you know, go look at a, go look at a Cisco PE chart and in, into,

131
00:09:18,922 --> 00:09:24,022
into 2000, right. From late 90s to 2000, like we're talking like 70, 80, ultimately up to,

132
00:09:24,062 --> 00:09:27,782
I believe like 150 X earnings forward, forward earnings. So not even established earnings,

133
00:09:27,782 --> 00:09:31,202
like looking forward, Wall Street consensus earnings, you know, Nvidia right now is trading

134
00:09:31,202 --> 00:09:35,082
at like 21 times forward. And that's on numbers that are definitely like way too low. Now you can

135
00:09:35,082 --> 00:09:38,402
argue like, yeah, maybe everyone knows that they're way too low and that's, that's priced in

136
00:09:38,402 --> 00:09:43,182
to buy side consensus already. Okay, fine. But like we are, my point is like, we are in a very

137
00:09:43,182 --> 00:09:47,722
different environment and it can get, it can get a lot sillier, right? Based on historical,

138
00:09:48,162 --> 00:09:51,962
historical trends and precedents. And, but I think what you're seeing right now is you see this,

139
00:09:51,962 --> 00:09:56,742
this chart on the bottom, like you are actually seeing like meaningful acceleration in reported

140
00:09:56,742 --> 00:10:00,722
earnings. Now that's definitely a function of running it hot. It's like, you know, on an

141
00:10:00,722 --> 00:10:04,762
inflation adjusted basis, is it as good as it looks like? No, probably not. But that's the game

142
00:10:04,762 --> 00:10:09,502
right now to, to keep the, to keep the, the wheel spinning and to keep this working.

143
00:10:09,862 --> 00:10:14,182
Um, you know, the administration really needs, uh, S and P earnings to, to rip.

144
00:10:14,382 --> 00:10:16,302
And thus far, like you are seeing that.

145
00:10:16,302 --> 00:10:19,982
So you could argue like, you know, there's been a popular meme on Fentwit in the last

146
00:10:19,982 --> 00:10:24,002
few weeks, you know, it's not a bubble in the P it's a bubble in the E people are overestimating

147
00:10:24,002 --> 00:10:27,842
the long-term, you know, earnings potential of these companies for various different reasons.

148
00:10:27,842 --> 00:10:29,342
But for now, right.

149
00:10:29,342 --> 00:10:33,182
It's not been primarily other than Intel Intel's definitely had, you know, it's trading like

150
00:10:33,182 --> 00:10:33,862
120 X earnings.

151
00:10:33,862 --> 00:10:40,382
Like a lot of these stalwarts right now are trading at, you know, justifiable, like theoretically, like squint.

152
00:10:40,442 --> 00:10:44,102
And you can kind of see it multiples, at least on earnings that are like clearly accelerating. Right.

153
00:10:44,622 --> 00:10:51,422
So this is a real story thus far. I think it's probably way too lazy to write it off as just circular financing entirely.

154
00:10:51,762 --> 00:10:59,462
You know, as you said, like we're using the tools like we see at the utilities there in a way that definitely like the utilities there, the infrastructure is there in a way that it was not in 1999.

155
00:10:59,462 --> 00:11:19,782
So for now, that analog doesn't really hold. And the question is like, can this continue and persist while oil sits where it is and while energy and input prices sit where they are? And can the U.S. leverage its relative strength on like the LNG side to continue this power build out that's necessary to maintain all this?

156
00:11:19,782 --> 00:11:25,322
Or is this all going to get short-circuited by an ongoing strife in the Middle East?

157
00:11:25,522 --> 00:11:30,842
And unclear, but this is clearly a very strong force pulling in one direction on the U.S. side.

158
00:11:31,402 --> 00:11:33,342
You're on mute, Marty. Marty, you're on mute.

159
00:11:33,802 --> 00:11:39,602
Sorry. I was saying even if the energy markets do perturb the infrastructure build out, I think it will be temporary.

160
00:11:39,942 --> 00:11:45,042
Again, like you said, like I said, the utility of these tools is there.

161
00:11:45,042 --> 00:11:51,202
It's very clear. And we're only in the warm-up stage of this. I mean, the eugentic economy just

162
00:11:51,202 --> 00:11:55,042
became a thing at the beginning of this year. I mean, I think you have some charts that will

163
00:11:55,042 --> 00:12:00,622
reference, but if you look at token usage growth, it's going hockey stick, and that will only

164
00:12:00,622 --> 00:12:06,922
continue to go parabolic, especially if robotics actually come to market and become a thing,

165
00:12:06,962 --> 00:12:12,502
which I think, I mean, you can make the argument that the robo-taxis and Teslas and Waymos are

166
00:12:12,502 --> 00:12:17,942
already a form of that robotics and if you if you think about humanoid robots and robots that will

167
00:12:17,942 --> 00:12:23,462
be used in manufacturing capacity like we're at the very early stages of token utilization and

168
00:12:23,462 --> 00:12:28,342
consumption they're gonna they're gonna hit numbers that that we can't even fathom right now

169
00:12:28,342 --> 00:12:32,502
and then on top of that i think to your point about valuation i think a lot of people were

170
00:12:33,222 --> 00:12:40,662
throwing water on the spacex sort of valuation of 1.5 trillion looking at their their s1 and

171
00:12:40,662 --> 00:12:45,302
actually just record an episode with john tinsman which should drop 20 minutes from now but i think

172
00:12:45,302 --> 00:12:50,502
one thing that he highlighted that a lot of people are overlooking with the spacex numbers that were

173
00:12:50,502 --> 00:12:56,182
that were disclosed is that deal with anthropic that they did for leasing out colossus which i

174
00:12:56,182 --> 00:13:02,902
think took them anywhere from seven to ten billion dollars to to build and i think that's a uh sort

175
00:13:02,902 --> 00:13:09,062
of a it might have been even cheaper than that and they're leasing out that compute for 1.6 or 1.9

176
00:13:09,062 --> 00:13:13,702
billion a month to Anthropic for the next three years. The multiple in that Colossus build out

177
00:13:13,702 --> 00:13:17,822
alone is going to be massive, and they're building Colossus II, which is going to be a gigawatt.

178
00:13:18,002 --> 00:13:23,182
Obviously, again, going back to the robotics thing, hasn't really materialized in a way that makes it

179
00:13:23,182 --> 00:13:29,282
obvious to people, but you can easily squint and see that becoming a real thing, and to the point

180
00:13:29,282 --> 00:13:34,882
that you were making, justifying some of these valuations with SpaceX specifically, but we have

181
00:13:34,882 --> 00:13:42,002
here next. I mean, staying on this theme, Anthropic just raised 65 bill Series H at a 965

182
00:13:42,002 --> 00:13:47,842
billion post-money valuation. OpenAI is beginning to, their models are beginning to solve and

183
00:13:47,842 --> 00:13:54,242
disprove central conjecture and discrete geometry. Again, the utilization, the productivity of these

184
00:13:54,242 --> 00:13:59,282
models is being proven out. And then on top of this, I believe Anthropic had its first profitable

185
00:13:59,282 --> 00:14:05,922
quarter earlier this year too. So the sort of meme of they're just spending money to win the race,

186
00:14:05,982 --> 00:14:08,782
they're not going to make any money on the back end is beginning to dissipate as well.

187
00:14:09,382 --> 00:14:13,462
Yeah. Look, I forgot to include that headline here, but I think that's a huge one too,

188
00:14:13,762 --> 00:14:18,382
for, you know, just starting to see data points for proving out the economics. But I totally

189
00:14:18,382 --> 00:14:22,122
agree with you. And I think, you know, even if there's a lot of talk about scaling laws and,

190
00:14:22,262 --> 00:14:26,742
you know, how far can they go? And, you know, if you throw X amount of compute on a log log basis

191
00:14:26,742 --> 00:14:32,102
at the problem? Like, do you get a commensurate increase on the curve that has been established

192
00:14:32,102 --> 00:14:37,422
in capabilities and all these different metrics? And like, I think, you know, that's an important

193
00:14:37,422 --> 00:14:40,642
conversation. And definitely like if suddenly scaling laws broke, like a lot of these stocks

194
00:14:40,642 --> 00:14:46,102
would have a problem for a while. But the reality is like, if everything's stopped tomorrow in terms

195
00:14:46,102 --> 00:14:53,862
of improvements and capabilities, like I think we're at like 0.01% of the actual utility that

196
00:14:53,862 --> 00:14:55,422
can be unlocked from what we have today.

197
00:14:55,542 --> 00:14:59,182
Like I look at my workflows and you know, everyone, anyone who follows you knows that

198
00:14:59,182 --> 00:15:03,642
you've been kind of on the cutting edge of, of remaking your business and TFTC with a

199
00:15:03,642 --> 00:15:04,562
lot of these tools.

200
00:15:04,782 --> 00:15:08,142
And I think you would probably say like, you can think of like, you know, a hundred

201
00:15:08,142 --> 00:15:09,982
things you'd like to do still better with them.

202
00:15:10,242 --> 00:15:11,882
I'm like even farther behind you.

203
00:15:11,982 --> 00:15:14,922
You know, I've really started in the last couple of months to, to ramp up more and

204
00:15:14,922 --> 00:15:15,922
rethink my workflows.

205
00:15:16,202 --> 00:15:20,382
But I can, you know, sitting here today, like I can imagine like another hundred things

206
00:15:20,382 --> 00:15:22,702
that I need to build and that I could automate better.

207
00:15:22,702 --> 00:15:25,802
And, you know, we don't even have like a massive business at 1031.

208
00:15:26,022 --> 00:15:30,442
Like think through, like apply that to all of the corporations that are out there that

209
00:15:30,442 --> 00:15:34,002
have a ton of inefficiency, but also a ton of creativity in a lot of their workforce.

210
00:15:34,302 --> 00:15:38,522
Like if everything stopped today in terms of advancement, we still have yet to, we have

211
00:15:38,522 --> 00:15:43,242
like multiple decades of unlocking actual utility and productivity, you know, beyond

212
00:15:43,242 --> 00:15:45,662
what we have today out of the tools that we have just today.

213
00:15:45,782 --> 00:15:50,162
So, you know, fully co-sign, like there's a big element of this that is like clearly

214
00:15:50,162 --> 00:15:52,262
being proven out right now and that is definitively not fake.

215
00:15:52,262 --> 00:15:57,922
And if at all, like if the curves stop tomorrow, like we've got a long way to go before we fully kind of harvest what's available today.

216
00:15:58,362 --> 00:16:06,822
Yeah. Which brings us to the other side of the coin, which is you have all this incredible growth, productivity, efficiency being brought to market.

217
00:16:06,822 --> 00:16:10,622
But then that is not being felt by everybody.

218
00:16:10,622 --> 00:16:21,442
Again, leaning into the K-shaped economy meme for looking at delinquency rates, 90-plus day delinquency rates on credit cards, student loan debt, auto loans, mortgages, all beginning to creep up.

219
00:16:21,562 --> 00:16:24,782
Credit cards getting to 2008 levels.

220
00:16:25,202 --> 00:16:29,562
If you look at savings rates, collapsing right now, lowest since April 2008.

221
00:16:29,562 --> 00:16:41,582
And so you have this, again, this juxtaposition of this incredible wave of productivity, sort of infrastructure investment now beginning to be profitability in the AI sector.

222
00:16:41,782 --> 00:16:50,862
And then the common man doesn't seem to be able to capture that value and put it to work for themselves.

223
00:16:50,862 --> 00:16:55,242
And they're obviously struggling as inflation begins to rear its head again.

224
00:16:55,242 --> 00:17:02,922
And the prospect of the jobs market becomes a bit more tumultuous for your average person.

225
00:17:03,502 --> 00:17:03,622
Yeah.

226
00:17:03,842 --> 00:17:05,262
I mean, here's your case shape.

227
00:17:05,342 --> 00:17:08,142
And I could have picked a bunch of other charts that would have kind of shown the same thing.

228
00:17:08,622 --> 00:17:13,282
And it's a really interesting time because we've highlighted this on prior episodes and in prior newsletters.

229
00:17:13,282 --> 00:17:32,144
But there like a there kind of a damned if you do damned if you don impact here or a dynamic here where it like you know what if what if we wrong about what if what if the U S is wrong and you know the AGI pill people are wrong about where this is all going and there all this you know massive capital expenditure and increasingly debt being taken out

230
00:17:32,144 --> 00:17:41,944
Not a massive amount yet, but you can see that increasing and, you know, resources being pumped into the data center build out and the AI build out on the assumption that this is going to be this is the future of the economy.

231
00:17:42,124 --> 00:17:50,624
And if for some reason that, you know, we're off by an order of magnitude and a lot of that goes goes belly up or goes upside down, you're going to have a major problem.

232
00:17:50,624 --> 00:17:57,804
like immediately, right? In tax receipts from bottoming out equity valuations, you'll have

233
00:17:57,804 --> 00:18:02,704
public markets collapsing, you'll have issues in the credit complex. Like that's a really bad

234
00:18:02,704 --> 00:18:07,104
scenario already. And it's going to get worse if more and more resources get pumped into this thing

235
00:18:07,104 --> 00:18:10,584
over the next few years, which is going to happen, right? So if you're wrong, that's not good as the

236
00:18:10,584 --> 00:18:16,724
U.S. What if you're right, right? Like what if the AGI-pilled people, the Darios and the Sams of

237
00:18:16,724 --> 00:18:20,564
the world, which by the way, some free advice guys, if you're listening, you're definitely not,

238
00:18:20,684 --> 00:18:24,044
if you're listening, please stop going on podcasts, like, or get a PR person who can

239
00:18:24,044 --> 00:18:27,164
help you in some way, massage this narrative better. But in any case, like what if that

240
00:18:27,164 --> 00:18:31,784
narrative is right? And you know, work is work is going away. We're going to like 30% unemployment

241
00:18:31,784 --> 00:18:34,984
before we finally get to, you know, AI utopia where everything's abundant and we have the

242
00:18:34,984 --> 00:18:39,624
star Trek future. And you've already got a huge amount of the economy looking like this, right?

243
00:18:39,624 --> 00:18:43,884
You've got people with delinquent student loans and increasingly auto loans and big credit card

244
00:18:43,884 --> 00:18:49,184
debt, you know, highest since 08. Mortgages are okay now, but like what happens when like 20%

245
00:18:49,184 --> 00:18:52,524
of the white collar workforce, you know, in middle management, like it's laid off, like our mortgage

246
00:18:52,524 --> 00:18:56,704
is going to look great in that case, like, you know, probably not. So if you're right, where does

247
00:18:56,704 --> 00:19:02,884
that leave us in terms of the social reaction function to all of this? And this is increasingly

248
00:19:02,884 --> 00:19:09,484
getting discussed on various sides that we can talk about. But, you know, this is a big cognitive

249
00:19:09,484 --> 00:19:13,544
dissonance and tension that is going to bear monitoring, I think, over the coming year.

250
00:19:13,884 --> 00:19:36,484
Yeah. To your point about the narrative side of things, they really need to figure this out. And it is, I mean, we'll just keep going down the chart here because I think what, I mean, I'll skip this for now unless you want to talk about it because I think the Mamdani stuff is probably more pertinent to this particular point of conversation.

251
00:19:36,484 --> 00:19:39,304
but I mean, you highlighted this juxtaposition.

252
00:19:39,504 --> 00:19:40,704
And I think to your point,

253
00:19:40,784 --> 00:19:44,184
I think Brad Gertzner recognizes this narrative problem.

254
00:19:44,184 --> 00:19:46,004
And he was on TBPN last week,

255
00:19:46,064 --> 00:19:49,024
beginning to sort of try to counteract

256
00:19:49,024 --> 00:19:52,764
the negative PR wins that are coming AI's way

257
00:19:52,764 --> 00:19:54,684
due to the energy usage,

258
00:19:55,024 --> 00:19:59,164
the specter of mass job losses because of the technology.

259
00:19:59,164 --> 00:20:01,484
And he's thinking about ways to work

260
00:20:01,484 --> 00:20:05,744
with the Trump administration to create an initiative

261
00:20:05,744 --> 00:20:09,044
that would, quote-unquote, deliver a very tangible, profound dividend

262
00:20:09,044 --> 00:20:11,124
to communities where they're building data centers.

263
00:20:11,344 --> 00:20:16,564
And then that's juxtaposed to news from last week of Mayor Mamdani

264
00:20:16,564 --> 00:20:20,264
from New York City pledging an aggressive crackdown on bad landlords,

265
00:20:20,544 --> 00:20:23,444
saying that New York City will work to transfer ownership of tenants.

266
00:20:23,444 --> 00:20:27,604
So talking about overt private property seizure in New York

267
00:20:27,604 --> 00:20:31,124
coming after the bad landlords.

268
00:20:31,124 --> 00:20:38,224
and you can see if that's becoming popular in the largest city in the United States,

269
00:20:38,324 --> 00:20:42,224
the financial hub of the world, it's very easy to project that forward

270
00:20:42,224 --> 00:20:48,124
and have people begin to demand similar actions against AI hyperscalers

271
00:20:48,784 --> 00:20:50,424
and anybody building out that infrastructure.

272
00:20:51,144 --> 00:20:51,824
Yeah, for sure.

273
00:20:51,964 --> 00:20:55,724
Look, the Mamdani thing, it's not obviously directly about AI,

274
00:20:55,724 --> 00:20:59,024
but people hate landlords in general,

275
00:20:59,024 --> 00:21:05,984
And like that feeling can can be and often is like weaponized by leftists and communists to to get certain outcomes.

276
00:21:06,144 --> 00:21:14,724
But like people really not not not just like, you know, you're like tie dye hair, like liberal arts grad who came out of like Barnard or something.

277
00:21:14,964 --> 00:21:19,544
You know, the not to not to over stereotype, but you're you're you're you're mom, Donnie base.

278
00:21:19,544 --> 00:21:25,244
Right. That you would expect. Like, obviously, a lot of emotions can be weaponized in that base.

279
00:21:25,244 --> 00:21:28,384
But like everyone hates data centers basically right now.

280
00:21:28,384 --> 00:21:36,244
And you can argue, like, I think there's interesting evidence that that's largely like an astroturf campaign that's being encouraged by certain foreign actors.

281
00:21:36,464 --> 00:21:37,384
We don't have to get into that.

282
00:21:37,744 --> 00:21:49,644
But, you know, it's pretty clear, like, there's an increasing tide of everyone from your Barnard grad to, like, your, you know, blue collar mechanic to, like, your random white collar worker in, you know, random second tier city, right?

283
00:21:49,684 --> 00:21:52,664
Like, everyone hates data centers increasingly.

284
00:21:52,664 --> 00:22:03,884
And so I think it's interesting that you see Gershner kind of floating this idea that he's going to work with tech leaders in the White House to make sure everyone gets taken care of based on the growth of these data centers and pay a dividend.

285
00:22:04,124 --> 00:22:09,364
You know, I love the capitalist framing of the equity based framing of this.

286
00:22:09,704 --> 00:22:13,164
What is basically just like, you know, a welfare payment based on this.

287
00:22:13,504 --> 00:22:16,904
You can see him trying to get out in front of it right with his own with his own spin.

288
00:22:17,444 --> 00:22:21,884
And, you know, the question to me is like, if you're doing that, like what's going to be more popular?

289
00:22:21,884 --> 00:22:27,204
Like, well, here's like a well-structured, you know, dividend plan based on the growth of data centers.

290
00:22:27,204 --> 00:22:30,824
Or is it going to be more popular to have a demagogue who says like, you know what, we'll just take your stuff.

291
00:22:31,084 --> 00:22:35,484
Right. Like, that's like that's increasingly in the Overton window now.

292
00:22:35,564 --> 00:22:38,144
That's a conversation a lot more people are going to have and going to want to have.

293
00:22:38,624 --> 00:22:46,944
And that has real implications for, as I said, like the social fabric and also the monetary and fiscal reaction function to potentially, you know,

294
00:22:46,944 --> 00:22:50,604
if you have discontinuous and sudden like nonlinear jumps in unemployment,

295
00:22:50,884 --> 00:22:53,404
again, with the K-shaped backdrop we already have,

296
00:22:53,524 --> 00:22:56,324
like what's the response to that ultimately going to be?

297
00:22:56,464 --> 00:22:59,184
Like there's a knee-jerk response, whether, regardless of like,

298
00:22:59,184 --> 00:23:01,624
whether it's, you know, Trump in office or AOC,

299
00:23:02,124 --> 00:23:04,544
whether it wears a MAGA hat or a Che Guevara t-shirt, right?

300
00:23:04,624 --> 00:23:07,044
Like there's one kind of common reaction function,

301
00:23:07,204 --> 00:23:09,684
which is in one way or another to print the money,

302
00:23:10,044 --> 00:23:11,644
to write the checks, to write the stimmies.

303
00:23:12,124 --> 00:23:14,484
Maybe you do that by monetizing excess,

304
00:23:14,484 --> 00:23:18,804
excess surpluses that have been saved overseas by trade surplus countries that we're friendly with,

305
00:23:18,884 --> 00:23:23,084
you know, as it seems like we're trying to do right now, whatever. But this kind of

306
00:23:23,084 --> 00:23:26,444
rhetoric like leads ultimately in one direction if it gets really popular.

307
00:23:27,264 --> 00:23:33,304
Yeah. And this is, it's funny. I've been talking to Tom Mazzaro from Cathedral about this because

308
00:23:33,304 --> 00:23:38,484
we actually did some research on this as it pertains to Bitcoin mining back in the day when

309
00:23:38,484 --> 00:23:41,804
we were having problems. But I think Bitcoin miners have done a good job of sort of figuring

310
00:23:41,804 --> 00:23:48,364
out the narrative and how to position things and AI data center builders could learn a lot from

311
00:23:48,364 --> 00:23:54,444
the hard work that we put in over the decade. But it was funny to see Gersner float this idea,

312
00:23:54,444 --> 00:24:02,124
because Tom's actually been publicly talking about an Alaskan oil permanent fund structure for these

313
00:24:02,764 --> 00:24:06,124
AI companies and local communities. If you have a data center come in, and to your point, it'd be

314
00:24:06,124 --> 00:24:11,344
be very similar to a dividend. But if they are as profitable, like if you think of like Colossus

315
00:24:11,344 --> 00:24:16,644
in Memphis and how profitable that's going to be alone, if you were to set up like a permanent fund

316
00:24:16,644 --> 00:24:22,664
for the local county, maybe the state, the city, whatever it may be, and just throw some dividend

317
00:24:22,664 --> 00:24:28,544
into that and you do that over time, I think that could be a good way to curb the blowback,

318
00:24:28,664 --> 00:24:31,784
the narrative blowback that you get. And then on top of that, I think it's a lot of education

319
00:24:31,784 --> 00:24:36,564
because I do think that all this is massively beneficial

320
00:24:36,564 --> 00:24:40,244
for those who know how to utilize the tools on the back end.

321
00:24:40,284 --> 00:24:42,864
But on the front end, I think the energy infrastructure build out

322
00:24:42,864 --> 00:24:44,844
is completely necessary.

323
00:24:45,364 --> 00:24:47,024
Take AI out of the equation.

324
00:24:47,244 --> 00:24:50,344
Like our grid systems need a revamp and a bolstering,

325
00:24:50,944 --> 00:24:52,664
whether or not AI was a thing.

326
00:24:53,004 --> 00:24:55,424
And so I think reinvestment in this energy infrastructure

327
00:24:55,424 --> 00:25:00,004
and hopefully investment to a point where we just have abundant,

328
00:25:00,004 --> 00:25:06,984
rather cheap energy because the case for investing in generation assets and interconnection assets

329
00:25:06,984 --> 00:25:12,904
and transmission assets is much easier to make because the revenue is much more reliable.

330
00:25:13,564 --> 00:25:19,544
This is going to be overall good for humanity. And this is, again, going back to Dario and Sam,

331
00:25:19,864 --> 00:25:24,164
like stop going on podcasts, like let people who can actually pitch a good vision of the world

332
00:25:24,164 --> 00:25:26,544
to do the narrative crafting for you.

333
00:25:26,604 --> 00:25:30,324
Because there is an actual, legitimate, good narrative

334
00:25:30,324 --> 00:25:33,024
to be spun here from the energy generation side.

335
00:25:33,124 --> 00:25:35,704
It's just the market and the average person

336
00:25:35,704 --> 00:25:37,964
has no idea how these energy markets work in the first place.

337
00:25:38,544 --> 00:25:39,104
Yeah, for sure.

338
00:25:39,304 --> 00:25:41,124
I mean, it was, to your point, it was a narrative that worked,

339
00:25:41,264 --> 00:25:42,524
a narrative pivot that I think worked well

340
00:25:42,524 --> 00:25:44,304
for Bitcoin mining several years ago.

341
00:25:44,404 --> 00:25:46,144
And I think that one of the most powerful charts

342
00:25:46,144 --> 00:25:48,384
people can see is like China's construction

343
00:25:48,384 --> 00:25:52,084
of new megawatts of grid production relative to the US.

344
00:25:52,084 --> 00:25:54,084
I think it's a very important thing to think about

345
00:25:54,084 --> 00:25:56,084
the economy.

346
00:25:56,084 --> 00:25:58,084
I think it's a very important thing to think about

347
00:25:58,084 --> 00:26:00,084
the economy.

348
00:26:00,084 --> 00:26:02,084
Ours has effectively flatlined for I don't even know how long,

349
00:26:02,084 --> 00:26:04,084
20 years.

350
00:26:04,084 --> 00:26:17,146
And China is up to the right constantly And I think people can see that intuitively grok that not sustainable And people can understand there no such thing as a rich And so you know moving more and more of the narrative to exactly that point I think would be very helpful and is not even just a narrative win like it is legitimately true but you know we see if

351
00:26:17,186 --> 00:26:21,706
if that kind of framing can win out, you know, AI data centers, bad,

352
00:26:21,806 --> 00:26:24,966
where we're going to move to seize the means of digital production.

353
00:26:25,526 --> 00:26:28,566
New York will find out the hard way. Hopefully we can avoid it. I think,

354
00:26:28,566 --> 00:26:31,506
I think the, I don't know,

355
00:26:31,506 --> 00:26:35,166
the branding of communism and socialism is not very good right now.

356
00:26:35,326 --> 00:26:40,006
I mean, you had Hassan, whatever, Piker get chased away from.

357
00:26:40,226 --> 00:26:42,266
I think he was chased away by ice riders.

358
00:26:42,426 --> 00:26:44,546
They're like, get out of here last night.

359
00:26:44,666 --> 00:26:45,926
But I digress.

360
00:26:46,126 --> 00:26:47,126
We're going to end it on this.

361
00:26:47,306 --> 00:26:50,666
Again, I told you we would talk about Bitcoin fundamentals

362
00:26:50,666 --> 00:26:53,306
from a narrative, or not a narrative, excuse me,

363
00:26:53,486 --> 00:26:56,526
from a sort of value, fundamental value prop side,

364
00:26:56,526 --> 00:26:57,966
and then on the technical side.

365
00:26:58,146 --> 00:27:01,106
And again, I think we missed last week,

366
00:27:01,106 --> 00:27:03,306
So we weren't able to talk about Hermu's safe.

367
00:27:03,306 --> 00:27:13,806
And then on top of that, we've got incredible developments happening on the privacy and medium of exchange payments aspect of Bitcoin from Cali and the Cashew Protocol project.

368
00:27:14,346 --> 00:27:14,426
Yeah.

369
00:27:14,706 --> 00:27:20,066
I mean, I think this is, you know, we like to end on Bitcoin, but I thought it was a really poetic juxtaposition of headlines.

370
00:27:20,246 --> 00:27:25,366
I think we hit Hermu's safe a little bit on the last episode when it like just dropped that morning when we talked about it.

371
00:27:25,426 --> 00:27:27,246
But we won't have to belabor it again.

372
00:27:27,326 --> 00:27:28,526
I'm sure people have heard of it at this point.

373
00:27:28,526 --> 00:27:41,026
But you've got Iran floating this idea of an insurance operation for maritime cargo going through the Strait of Hormuz, administered by Iran with fees paid in Bitcoin, settled on Bitcoin blockchain.

374
00:27:41,686 --> 00:27:48,666
This is one potential validation of the long-running Bitcoin thesis that it's money for enemies.

375
00:27:49,186 --> 00:27:54,926
And you've got a heavily sanctioned country trying to launch what is really, frankly, like kind of a protection racket.

376
00:27:54,926 --> 00:28:09,906
Like, I don't really expect it to get off the ground, but trying to launch this with direct integration to Bitcoin, because that's the only thing that's appropriate for this very adversarial payment situation for a sanctioned country, is a perfect validation that sovereigns care, sovereigns are paying attention.

377
00:28:10,366 --> 00:28:16,106
You know, the biggest players in the world understand some of the key properties we've been talking about related to Bitcoin for a long time.

378
00:28:16,106 --> 00:28:23,546
This is not an encouragement from TFTC or 1031 for anyone to go and use Bitcoin to avoid U.S. sanctions.

379
00:28:23,726 --> 00:28:26,086
Just an observation of what that might mean.

380
00:28:26,766 --> 00:28:37,406
And again, I don't expect it to actually get off the ground in any meaningful way because just using Bitcoin is not going to stop someone from being sanctioned and from feeling the pain of U.S. sanctions for participating with Iran.

381
00:28:37,826 --> 00:28:39,906
But interesting data point on the sovereign side.

382
00:28:39,906 --> 00:28:49,086
On the technical privacy kind of 100 sat scale, like the Hormuz safe is relevant for the 1,000 plus Bitcoin scale.

383
00:28:49,206 --> 00:28:51,866
This is relevant for like the 100 sat scale, the average daily user.

384
00:28:52,806 --> 00:29:00,386
Kali's been, if you're not familiar with him, you should follow him on Twitter, Nostra everywhere, a real monster in Bitcoin and Bitcoin oriented development.

385
00:29:01,426 --> 00:29:07,606
And has been working for a while on using secure enclaves to facilitate cash amounts.

386
00:29:07,606 --> 00:29:25,106
We probably don't have time to get deeply into Cashew on the show right now, but basically an implementation of Chami Necash that has potential promise to make Bitcoin much more tractable as a medium of exchange for small payments or even increasingly large payments as well.

387
00:29:25,106 --> 00:29:41,406
Very simple, very dumb, easy to play with, easy to develop on, makes certain tradeoffs relative to using Bitcoin itself on the blockchain, but for potentially significant gains in speed, ease of integration, and various other benefits.

388
00:29:41,406 --> 00:30:07,186
I'll hand it off to you to talk about this particular development, but the high-level theme that I think this highlights is if Valley's right and this is moving in a certain direction, you could have the potential here to solve one of the major trade-offs of using Chaminikash, which is the operator of a Mint can potentially inflate supply and effectively rug participants in the Mint without much pushback from the users or a way to govern that.

389
00:30:07,186 --> 00:30:10,866
this could potentially be a solve for that. And it just pushes you one step closer to

390
00:30:10,866 --> 00:30:15,106
maybe making this very viable at scale. And so I just think it's interesting that like,

391
00:30:15,406 --> 00:30:21,586
as price, you know, as price flattens, flat lines, it's a crappy environment out there.

392
00:30:22,066 --> 00:30:26,126
We, you know, everyone's bored, everyone's going away and buying AI bottleneck stocks.

393
00:30:26,266 --> 00:30:29,846
You're seeing meaningful validation at both the sovereign level and the technical level

394
00:30:29,846 --> 00:30:35,806
for what we've been talking about in Bitcoin. And the reasons that we're here in the first place,

395
00:30:35,806 --> 00:30:41,466
Right. Like even as the bear market drags on, like you're seeing ongoing validation of everything that, you know, that we care about here.

396
00:30:42,146 --> 00:30:45,086
Yeah, completely agree. Matt and I talked about it on Friday.

397
00:30:45,466 --> 00:30:49,686
Not this specifically, but the fact that sentiment, I think I've been a Bitcoin since 2013.

398
00:30:49,686 --> 00:30:52,646
I think this sentiment is the worst since 2015.

399
00:30:52,646 --> 00:30:58,226
And historically, that is the best time to be allocating to Bitcoin, not financial advice.

400
00:30:58,226 --> 00:31:03,426
Just highlighting some pattern recognition from my days in the trenches over the years.

401
00:31:03,426 --> 00:31:06,946
but as it pertains to what Kali is referencing here

402
00:31:06,946 --> 00:31:07,886
for the Cachew Protocol,

403
00:31:08,146 --> 00:31:11,326
I think the trusted execution environments are slept on.

404
00:31:11,806 --> 00:31:14,546
We have a company in the portfolio, Maple AI,

405
00:31:15,066 --> 00:31:17,586
that we backed because of their utilization

406
00:31:17,586 --> 00:31:19,026
of trusted execution environments.

407
00:31:19,166 --> 00:31:20,426
And essentially for those who are unaware,

408
00:31:21,206 --> 00:31:25,966
these environments allow you to run code in secure enclaves.

409
00:31:26,506 --> 00:31:29,526
And so your phone, your iPhone, you're doing face ID.

410
00:31:30,166 --> 00:31:32,446
Basically, people think that a lot of people just assume

411
00:31:32,446 --> 00:31:35,806
that you're sending your biometric data to an iCloud server,

412
00:31:35,966 --> 00:31:39,366
but no, your face is a private key

413
00:31:39,366 --> 00:31:41,286
that's held on the secure enclave in your phone.

414
00:31:41,366 --> 00:31:43,126
You can run software on that.

415
00:31:43,186 --> 00:31:45,686
Not only that, but you can interact with secure enclaves

416
00:31:45,686 --> 00:31:47,386
in the cloud as well.

417
00:31:47,566 --> 00:31:49,246
And what these secure enclaves allow you to do

418
00:31:49,246 --> 00:31:53,406
is to run compute in a way that the person

419
00:31:53,406 --> 00:31:56,726
actually running the computer has no idea what's going on.

420
00:31:56,926 --> 00:31:58,846
It is a trusted execution environment.

421
00:31:59,246 --> 00:32:01,766
And what Callie is referencing here,

422
00:32:01,766 --> 00:32:04,306
I'm not going to pretend to know exactly what he's built.

423
00:32:04,646 --> 00:32:09,566
And I think he's been a bit sort of opaque about what's actually happening

424
00:32:09,566 --> 00:32:11,526
and just sort of alluding to what they're doing.

425
00:32:11,626 --> 00:32:16,686
But what I assume is that you were able to set up a Mint within a secure enclave

426
00:32:16,686 --> 00:32:18,966
using one of these trusted execution environments.

427
00:32:19,886 --> 00:32:25,826
And you can sign blinded messages for the Mint users,

428
00:32:26,766 --> 00:32:29,366
or blinded signatures, excuse me, to facilitate payments.

429
00:32:29,366 --> 00:32:45,626
And to John's point, if you can do like a reproducible build to prove that the operator of the Mint can actually control it at the end of the day, can inflate supply, can prevent people from spending, that is going to be massive.

430
00:32:45,626 --> 00:32:59,686
And I think the progress that we've seen with TEE specifically is, again, slept on, but something that I would highlight for anybody listening to pay attention to moving forward.

431
00:32:59,686 --> 00:33:05,286
particularly, I mean, we backed Maple originally, their Mutiny wallet pivoted to Maple, but we were

432
00:33:05,286 --> 00:33:12,006
very comfortable with the pivot to Maple and the focus on AI over non-custodial Bitcoin Lightning

433
00:33:12,006 --> 00:33:18,406
wallets using these trusted execution environments. Because I think as many people become more aware

434
00:33:18,406 --> 00:33:25,366
of how much data you're going to be sharing with the hyperscalers, the demand for the ability to do

435
00:33:25,366 --> 00:33:31,966
AI compute and execute a trusted execution environment that a hyperscaler doesn't have

436
00:33:31,966 --> 00:33:37,806
access to the information, the prompts or the outputs that you're putting in and getting out.

437
00:33:37,926 --> 00:33:41,746
The demand for products like that is going to increase significantly. I think actually it will

438
00:33:41,746 --> 00:33:48,366
be mandated for certain applications like legal, health, whatever it may be. And so it's really

439
00:33:48,366 --> 00:33:54,726
cool to see this being reintroduced to Bitcoin. Mutiny really led the way there many years ago

440
00:33:54,726 --> 00:33:57,706
with the non-custodial Lightning Wallets using these secure enclaves.

441
00:33:57,886 --> 00:34:00,546
And it looks like Cashew is leaning into it as well.

442
00:34:00,766 --> 00:34:05,966
And so this is going to create a very secure and private Bitcoin infrastructure,

443
00:34:06,366 --> 00:34:07,106
which is great to see.

444
00:34:07,706 --> 00:34:08,386
Yep, absolutely.

445
00:34:08,726 --> 00:34:12,506
It's a good time to be paying attention to what really matters in Bitcoin.

446
00:34:12,806 --> 00:34:14,066
And it's exactly what you'd want to see.

447
00:34:14,266 --> 00:34:16,646
When the price isn't going your way,

448
00:34:16,646 --> 00:34:19,086
the question is what's happening under the hood with fundamentals.

449
00:34:19,346 --> 00:34:23,766
And I think we're only getting positive fundamentals year on year here.

450
00:34:24,426 --> 00:34:24,506
Yeah.

451
00:34:24,506 --> 00:34:29,586
that's great hey wild times out there i'm going into summer i don't think there's going to be

452
00:34:29,586 --> 00:34:34,206
summer doldrums this year i have a hard time to believe that it's going to be a very doldrum filled

453
00:34:34,206 --> 00:34:40,806
summer i think things are just heating up proverbially pun intended john great rep as

454
00:34:40,806 --> 00:34:42,506
always we'll be back next week
