1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:26,240
John, World War III is upon us. Bombs are going off. Most people are unaware. We were just talking about this before we hit record in the land outside of X and the internet. But yeah, crazy weekend. A lot to talk about. And I think it would make sense to start with the war in Iran and spreading throughout the Middle East right now and its implications on the markets that we track and that touch Bitcoin.

2
00:00:26,240 --> 00:00:32,460
So you took some time this weekend to write about fast takeoffs and hard landings for the timestamp.

3
00:00:32,940 --> 00:00:34,180
What are the last 72 hours?

4
00:00:34,360 --> 00:00:37,500
What are the implications of what's happening right now in your mind?

5
00:00:38,060 --> 00:00:38,260
Yeah.

6
00:00:38,420 --> 00:00:48,740
I mean, if anyone's familiar with the great movie Airplane, it increasingly feels over the last year like every week is the wrong week to have stopped sniffing glue like the air traffic controller.

7
00:00:49,020 --> 00:00:50,500
Constantly, constantly feeling that way.

8
00:00:50,500 --> 00:01:00,020
And I see all the people can see that Marty has already migrated to greener pastures to ride out the impending doom that we're all facing now.

9
00:01:00,180 --> 00:01:01,780
So that's probably something I should have done.

10
00:01:02,040 --> 00:01:06,700
But yeah, it's crazy, crazy week among many crazy weeks.

11
00:01:07,020 --> 00:01:13,180
And I think it was just an interesting set of headlines that came across the wire over the course of the week.

12
00:01:13,180 --> 00:01:19,260
and tried to connect them a little bit in the timestamp this week at the risk of sounding

13
00:01:19,260 --> 00:01:22,760
or becoming a little too much like a Charlie Day in front of the Peve Sylvia board.

14
00:01:22,980 --> 00:01:25,220
Feels like there are some noteworthy connections we can highlight.

15
00:01:25,540 --> 00:01:29,220
But yeah, maybe just starting on what everyone's thinking about and talking about this morning

16
00:01:29,220 --> 00:01:35,440
is the U.S. has not declared but declared war on Iran.

17
00:01:35,960 --> 00:01:41,900
And we are currently in the very early stages of some sort of regime change over there.

18
00:01:41,900 --> 00:01:47,100
Um, so not going to comment on, you know, all the, all the fog of war, uh, disqualifications

19
00:01:47,100 --> 00:01:51,960
and, uh, caveats certainly hold, and, you know, not going to comment on how any of it's

20
00:01:51,960 --> 00:01:54,120
going to go or, or reports that we're getting out of there.

21
00:01:54,120 --> 00:02:00,080
But I think like one thing to pull out, maybe as we sit here today that I was trying to

22
00:02:00,080 --> 00:02:04,980
highlight in the timestamp is like, you've quickly, you quickly saw over the course of

23
00:02:04,980 --> 00:02:07,640
this weekend, once we got the announcement on Saturday morning, that this was happening,

24
00:02:07,640 --> 00:02:13,280
you know, a lot of takes on all different parts of the political spectrum. Generally, I would say

25
00:02:13,280 --> 00:02:19,080
pretty universally, this is like not been a popular concept of like, you know, doing this in some,

26
00:02:19,180 --> 00:02:23,760
in some way. I think it's been hard for people to see what America's interest could be here.

27
00:02:24,020 --> 00:02:29,120
And I think that that's all very legitimate. And I'd sympathize with a ton of it. You and I are

28
00:02:29,120 --> 00:02:36,340
both children of the Ron Paul 2012 campaign. So I think we're both very non-indimensionist at heart.

29
00:02:36,340 --> 00:02:48,540
I think one thing, though, just from like a real politic perspective of kind of like trying to figure out like what's going on here and like why this is why this is happening that I haven't seen in a lot of headlines and like mainstream conversation.

30
00:02:48,540 --> 00:02:55,600
You see it a little more on Twitter over the last 24 hours and, you know, certain like an on profile pictures talking about this.

31
00:02:55,740 --> 00:03:06,640
But, you know, the thing that we've been watching here at 1031 for several months is just like the early even a year is the overall trend toward like decoupling relative to primarily China.

32
00:03:06,800 --> 00:03:08,920
Right. And we've talked about this on the show before.

33
00:03:08,920 --> 00:03:16,600
And I think we've tried to ask ourselves with anything that the admin is doing or any kind of geopolitical headlines that maybe don't make a ton of sense in isolation.

34
00:03:16,600 --> 00:03:20,700
Like, how does this potentially relate to an overall broader strategy?

35
00:03:21,240 --> 00:03:25,420
I think there are a lot of people who are still kind of sitting there convinced that, you know, orange man, stupid.

36
00:03:25,540 --> 00:03:29,940
And there's kind of nothing under the hood that could possibly be like justifying what's going on.

37
00:03:29,940 --> 00:03:39,720
And I think that's like kind of a ultimately disastrous way to be thinking if you're trying to allocate capital, if you're trying to be an investor or just protect your wealth.

38
00:03:40,480 --> 00:03:51,660
And I think there are a lot of signs pointing to, you know, everything should kind of be viewed through like an existential lens of trying to decouple from or undermine the influence of China.

39
00:03:51,760 --> 00:03:58,420
Whether you think that's like a good thing or a bad thing, I think that's just like pretty clearly the framing that the admin and the Pentagon are taking right now.

40
00:03:58,420 --> 00:04:08,560
Um, and so I think the thing that we were pointing out in the timestamp over the last few months and in the last, and this past weekend is this looks a lot more than anything else.

41
00:04:08,620 --> 00:04:22,040
Like not, not a war for, you know, freedom and democracy and, you know, protecting our values and projecting them abroad, but it can end around to further pressure at you, the Chinese who are net energy importers from a variety of different sources.

42
00:04:22,040 --> 00:04:28,100
one of which is quite famously Iran. Iran is a sanctioned source. So you like won't find them

43
00:04:28,100 --> 00:04:32,700
on a lot of different tallies of Chinese oil imports, but various different estimates point

44
00:04:32,700 --> 00:04:37,660
to them. I like this one that I found here from Columbia point to them exporting close to one and

45
00:04:37,660 --> 00:04:42,620
a half million barrels per day to China. For context, that is like, I think roughly in line

46
00:04:42,620 --> 00:04:46,540
with the Saudis, maybe a little lower, and then maybe like, you know, a half to two thirds of

47
00:04:46,540 --> 00:04:51,220
what Russia does. And I believe Russia is their China's biggest oil exporter. So to us,

48
00:04:51,220 --> 00:04:53,860
that really is like where the focus should be.

49
00:04:53,860 --> 00:04:56,640
And I think it potentially starts to make a lot more sense,

50
00:04:56,800 --> 00:04:58,960
you know, when you start thinking

51
00:04:58,960 --> 00:05:01,360
through all of these geopolitical games

52
00:05:01,360 --> 00:05:03,520
from the perspective of how does it affect

53
00:05:03,520 --> 00:05:04,780
our positioning vis-a-vis China.

54
00:05:05,000 --> 00:05:07,320
We're sitting here as like two dudes on the internet

55
00:05:07,320 --> 00:05:10,140
who have no actual alpha on what the DODs

56
00:05:10,140 --> 00:05:12,640
or the DOW, excuse me, is thinking you're doing.

57
00:05:13,260 --> 00:05:16,180
But I think like this is a helpful framing

58
00:05:16,180 --> 00:05:18,660
and set of questions that people should be asking

59
00:05:18,660 --> 00:05:19,760
as they look at these headlines

60
00:05:19,760 --> 00:05:21,000
and as they look at the next few weeks,

61
00:05:21,000 --> 00:05:24,240
like what we do or don't do in Iran or other countries, right?

62
00:05:24,300 --> 00:05:29,620
Like certainly, you know, Trump has rattled his saber at Cuba and Colombia and various

63
00:05:29,620 --> 00:05:32,440
others that have maybe had some like Chinese influence in the past.

64
00:05:32,880 --> 00:05:37,880
So to us, that's kind of like the Rosetta Stone for a lot of this to keep in mind going

65
00:05:37,880 --> 00:05:38,180
forward.

66
00:05:38,760 --> 00:05:38,840
Yeah.

67
00:05:38,880 --> 00:05:45,460
And I think having watched what's played out since the national security strategy was set

68
00:05:45,460 --> 00:05:50,560
out at the beginning of November last year and looking at sort of the line of thinking

69
00:05:50,560 --> 00:05:55,040
that you just went down. I think it is pretty descriptive. If you are thinking strategically

70
00:05:55,040 --> 00:06:01,620
from a geopolitical sort of chessboard reordering into this more multipolar world where it's very

71
00:06:01,620 --> 00:06:07,620
much the United States versus China being the dominant power players. And if you're thinking

72
00:06:07,620 --> 00:06:13,980
of an order of operations, what the Trump administration would need to do to effectuate

73
00:06:13,980 --> 00:06:16,360
that national security strategy.

74
00:06:16,820 --> 00:06:20,760
It's basically, it's take away the raw input

75
00:06:20,760 --> 00:06:23,280
of the Chinese economy, which is energy.

76
00:06:23,400 --> 00:06:24,740
And so I think the order of operations

77
00:06:24,740 --> 00:06:25,580
have taken out Maduro,

78
00:06:26,040 --> 00:06:29,260
securing that oil resource

79
00:06:29,260 --> 00:06:32,040
and also blocking China and Russia off from it.

80
00:06:32,180 --> 00:06:35,040
And then feeling comfortable to go into Iran,

81
00:06:35,440 --> 00:06:37,320
which is providing China

82
00:06:37,320 --> 00:06:39,540
with another significant tranche of oil there.

83
00:06:40,140 --> 00:06:40,880
It wouldn't make sense.

84
00:06:40,980 --> 00:06:43,020
Obviously, there's a ton of other theories

85
00:06:43,020 --> 00:06:43,880
which you alluded to.

86
00:06:43,980 --> 00:06:47,520
which probably not productive to go down on this show.

87
00:06:47,560 --> 00:06:53,420
But I think not only is the energy side of things something that, again, if we're looking back,

88
00:06:53,480 --> 00:06:57,480
like seems pretty descriptive, just looking at what's happened over the last three months.

89
00:06:58,040 --> 00:07:00,400
The other side of the coin is AI.

90
00:07:00,400 --> 00:07:01,840
We're in this race.

91
00:07:02,360 --> 00:07:17,590
And I think the saber rattling between the Department of War and Anthropic over the last couple of weeks has been indicative of this sort of national security strategy being implemented as well And so that another big

92
00:07:17,590 --> 00:07:23,450
thing where we have the Department of War basically trying to industrialize this budding

93
00:07:23,450 --> 00:07:28,350
AI industry in the United States as well, which will have some pretty profound implications if

94
00:07:28,350 --> 00:07:36,370
they're able to do that effectively. Yeah, for sure. Anyone who's not familiar with Elbridge

95
00:07:36,370 --> 00:07:41,110
Colby, we should go look up his work. He's, I think, had a role in the first Trump administration

96
00:07:41,110 --> 00:07:46,570
and is now a fairly high-ranking official in, I believe, the DOW somewhere in the Pentagon.

97
00:07:46,990 --> 00:07:52,490
But he wrote a book in like 2019, maybe, called Strategy of Denial, which is basically just kind

98
00:07:52,490 --> 00:07:58,610
of going through, you know, exactly what Marty's outlining, like a way that the U.S. should approach

99
00:07:58,610 --> 00:08:04,250
kind of all foreign policy and geopolitical relationships with an eye toward containing

100
00:08:04,250 --> 00:08:09,530
Chinese influence. And so I think, you know, that's the kind of guy who's sitting there kind

101
00:08:09,530 --> 00:08:13,970
of holding the pin on a lot of this stuff. And you can ask, you know, who has the ultimate influence,

102
00:08:13,970 --> 00:08:17,650
who's ultimately making decisions and kind of pulling the levers. But I think there's a lot of,

103
00:08:17,950 --> 00:08:21,670
frankly, a lot of officials in the admin have been pretty open about what they want to do

104
00:08:21,670 --> 00:08:26,490
and what they're focused on. So I do think going forward, that's going to color how the admin

105
00:08:26,490 --> 00:08:30,990
operates. And I think they see themselves increasingly on like wartime footing because

106
00:08:30,990 --> 00:08:35,210
of guys like that. You saw it this weekend in Iran and then Marty, to your point, like this,

107
00:08:35,210 --> 00:08:39,290
this kerfuffle between the Pentagon and Anthropic over the last couple of weeks

108
00:08:39,290 --> 00:08:45,170
that ultimately ended up as this headline shows with the white house blacklisting Anthropic and

109
00:08:45,170 --> 00:08:49,490
saying that the Pentagon can't use their, their tools and their models anymore. And then Sam

110
00:08:49,490 --> 00:08:54,650
Altman jumped on that immediately and inked a deal for open AI to backfill and provide a lot of that

111
00:08:54,650 --> 00:08:59,050
stuff out of the Pentagon. But I think this is like, this is a really interesting headline to

112
00:08:59,050 --> 00:09:02,910
have happened at the same time, basically as, as the Iran stuff, because again, it's like,

113
00:09:02,970 --> 00:09:09,170
I think all of these things look kind of baffling if, or like way overly aggressive. And again,

114
00:09:09,170 --> 00:09:12,590
I'm not even necessarily saying that there are good things, bad things are a lot of like pros

115
00:09:12,590 --> 00:09:16,650
and cons to all of these decisions and a lot of different value judgments that can be made.

116
00:09:16,650 --> 00:09:23,590
But I think like it's very easy to if you're seeing just one headline after another to think that this all looks very disconnected.

117
00:09:23,810 --> 00:09:28,350
And, you know, like Trump Trump and his people are just kind of flailing around.

118
00:09:28,650 --> 00:09:34,250
And I think this actually aligns really well with what happened in Iran over the weekend.

119
00:09:34,630 --> 00:09:45,370
Insofar as I think it tells you like the the U.S. is very clearly intent on both asserting more control in but also expanding for better or worse.

120
00:09:45,370 --> 00:09:49,710
I think the definition of what it means, what their sphere of influence means, right? So as

121
00:09:49,710 --> 00:09:54,250
you would expect to see that too, again, not justifying one way or the other, but you would

122
00:09:54,250 --> 00:09:59,630
expect to see that too, if you came to the conclusion that the admin effectively believes

123
00:09:59,630 --> 00:10:03,830
it's at war, right? If you go back and look at things that have happened in the US in World War

124
00:10:03,830 --> 00:10:09,450
One, World War Two, with the government effectively like requisitioning private assets and taking over

125
00:10:09,450 --> 00:10:13,590
whole industries and redirecting them, redirecting their production to one thing or another that was

126
00:10:13,590 --> 00:10:18,950
needed for the quote unquote national interest. Um, you know, uh, we have a long history of

127
00:10:18,950 --> 00:10:23,690
the government deciding like when, when things hit the fan, when things get really hairy,

128
00:10:23,690 --> 00:10:27,730
the rules kind of change. You can, you can like that or not. You can say that that's net good or

129
00:10:27,730 --> 00:10:33,630
not for, you know, per capita kind of everyone's economic wellbeing, but we've seen enough examples

130
00:10:33,630 --> 00:10:37,830
both in the U S and just like general history going back thousands of years that when push

131
00:10:37,830 --> 00:10:43,830
comes to shove, the sovereign kind of reasserts itself. Um, and so, you know, my, my subtitle for

132
00:10:43,830 --> 00:10:47,490
the email this week was, was sovereign is he who decides the model weights? Cause it's the,

133
00:10:47,490 --> 00:10:53,170
the essence of this fight is can anthropic tell the government our models will do thus and such,

134
00:10:53,170 --> 00:10:58,810
but not this and that thing, right? Like can, can, can the models be flexible enough for the,

135
00:10:58,810 --> 00:11:04,530
you know, the Pentagon to, to use them as they see fit, right. To deal with national security

136
00:11:04,530 --> 00:11:08,990
threats. Um, and so that's like, it brings up a question of like, who has sovereignty over these

137
00:11:08,990 --> 00:11:13,550
things? Like, this is what the AI maxis are telling you, what anthropics telling you, what

138
00:11:13,550 --> 00:11:17,310
Sam Allman's telling you is like, these are basically super weapons or they're kind of

139
00:11:17,310 --> 00:11:22,050
moving in the direction of becoming that. So it's like, who actually gets to decide like what they

140
00:11:22,050 --> 00:11:27,670
can and can't do in different situations. And I think the, the Pentagon making this huge stink

141
00:11:27,670 --> 00:11:30,550
in this whole, like, you know, press release war that went back and forth and ultimately

142
00:11:30,550 --> 00:11:35,210
blacklisting anthropic is like, you know, just another kind of data point to put on the pile that

143
00:11:35,210 --> 00:11:39,730
the government right now is, is acting like a world war II type government, right? It's not,

144
00:11:39,730 --> 00:11:45,470
you know, yeah, 19, eight post 1989 post fall Berlin wall, like, or, you know, 1990s, like

145
00:11:45,470 --> 00:11:51,130
golden era, golden era, the unipolar moment situation. It's, it's moving much more back into

146
00:11:51,130 --> 00:11:56,230
kind of a wartime footing, both domestically and abroad. And, you know, all that is to,

147
00:11:56,230 --> 00:12:02,630
all that is to say all that points to like certain implications for the way that i think you you want

148
00:12:02,630 --> 00:12:07,190
to handle your personal allocations or if you're an institution like institutional allocations i

149
00:12:07,190 --> 00:12:12,870
think it says many things about where the world's going financially over the next 10 years that it

150
00:12:12,870 --> 00:12:18,150
would be kind of unwise to ignore or write off on the basis that like you know trump is crazy and two

151
00:12:18,150 --> 00:12:23,430
years will be out anyway yeah i think it would be completely nuts to do that and i think you did a

152
00:12:23,430 --> 00:12:29,670
a really good job of distilling and aligning all these disparate things that, to your point,

153
00:12:29,670 --> 00:12:34,670
like you said earlier, many people would see them as random and very extreme.

154
00:12:34,670 --> 00:12:41,190
But I think if you take a step back, look at it from a 30,000-foot view, it looks like

155
00:12:41,190 --> 00:12:45,230
what we've been talking about for months, not only on the show, but in the newsletter.

156
00:12:45,230 --> 00:12:49,950
It seems like we are on wartime footing and have been for some time again, going back to

157
00:12:49,950 --> 00:12:52,490
the National Security Strategy document from last November.

158
00:12:52,490 --> 00:12:56,810
I think it made that document made it abundantly clear how the Trump administration is thinking,

159
00:12:56,990 --> 00:12:58,690
and they're moving rather quickly.

160
00:12:59,190 --> 00:13:01,690
And again, not a judgment whether this is good or bad,

161
00:13:01,690 --> 00:13:05,670
but I think it's undeniably impressive how quickly they're moving at some of this stuff.

162
00:13:05,770 --> 00:13:13,550
And to your point, whether or not they ultimately, the decisions they make end up being for the benefit of the American people in the world at large,

163
00:13:13,590 --> 00:13:14,850
in the long run, is yet to be determined.

164
00:13:15,070 --> 00:13:15,970
We're still in the fog of war.

165
00:13:16,390 --> 00:13:21,850
But I think one thing is clear, they may have an agenda, and they're trying to execute on it.

166
00:13:22,490 --> 00:13:23,490
at the very least.

167
00:13:23,490 --> 00:13:29,050
And I think, going back to something else you said, which is we are both sort of anti-interventionist

168
00:13:29,050 --> 00:13:32,050
accolades of the Ron Paul 2012 era.

169
00:13:32,050 --> 00:13:37,030
And that's, I mean, if we are on wartime footing, I'm just having pattern recognition

170
00:13:37,030 --> 00:13:42,330
going off in my head right now, particularly focusing in on the saber rattling between

171
00:13:42,330 --> 00:13:44,430
Anthropoc and the Department of War.

172
00:13:44,430 --> 00:13:52,150
I mean, I could see this being the Patriot Act moment of this era, which somebody lifts

173
00:13:52,150 --> 00:13:58,150
that. And I think the ramifications of the Patriot Act are abundantly clear now, over 20 years since

174
00:13:58,150 --> 00:14:04,310
it was enacted, that it was a terrible precedent to scent and has erected this dragnet surveillance

175
00:14:04,310 --> 00:14:12,150
system on US citizens in the world at large. And I think if we're going to do a AI Patriot Act

176
00:14:12,150 --> 00:14:24,800
this time around the implications are going to be an order of magnitude worse for individual And to that point I think that why we have a hard focus here at 1031 on freedom tech

177
00:14:25,040 --> 00:14:28,900
And Bitcoin is a freedom technology, a freedom protocol.

178
00:14:29,280 --> 00:14:33,780
But as it pertains to AI, I think that's one thing that we're pretty passionate about is

179
00:14:33,780 --> 00:14:38,380
ensuring that individuals have the ability to interact with these large language models

180
00:14:38,380 --> 00:14:43,720
in a way that is private, sovereign, and done in a way where the model provider cannot spy

181
00:14:43,720 --> 00:14:48,380
on you, which is expressed via our investment in Maple AI.

182
00:14:48,380 --> 00:14:51,140
So yeah, I just wanted to throw that out there.

183
00:14:51,140 --> 00:14:57,020
I can see AI Patriot Act becoming a thing in the next nine months if this stuff escalates

184
00:14:57,020 --> 00:14:58,020
even further.

185
00:14:58,020 --> 00:14:59,020
Yeah.

186
00:14:59,020 --> 00:15:03,000
Unfortunately, I think that's probably some version of it.

187
00:15:03,000 --> 00:15:07,280
So everyone should kind of watch out for that, do the best they can to kind of position against

188
00:15:07,280 --> 00:15:13,580
it. Um, but it, it's definitely, you know, it goes back to the theme of just like, um,

189
00:15:14,120 --> 00:15:18,600
once this stuff starts being treated rightly or wrongly, like, you know, nuclear launch codes,

190
00:15:18,600 --> 00:15:23,180
it, the implications radically change for both individuals and, you know, what individuals can

191
00:15:23,180 --> 00:15:28,980
do and what companies can do. And, you know, I think in that world, it's also very, it's good

192
00:15:28,980 --> 00:15:35,060
to think about having assets as well at your disposal, a use having a, you know, sovereign AI

193
00:15:35,060 --> 00:15:40,060
stack, but also in that world, having assets at your disposal that have a minimal, uh,

194
00:15:40,060 --> 00:15:46,220
calculate risk and can be used as permissionlessly, uh, as possible, ideally on a, on a global,

195
00:15:46,220 --> 00:15:47,960
on a globally liquid basis.

196
00:15:47,960 --> 00:15:50,940
So I think all of this just kind of comes back to reinforcing as well.

197
00:15:50,940 --> 00:15:55,780
You know, I don't think there could be a better time to be investing the space we're investing

198
00:15:55,780 --> 00:15:57,680
in and focusing on what we're focusing on.

199
00:15:57,680 --> 00:16:03,440
I don't think you could imagine price action aside, like trends that are fundamentally more

200
00:16:03,440 --> 00:16:10,400
favorable to and more in line with the thesis that animated Bitcoin's creation in the first place in

201
00:16:10,400 --> 00:16:15,520
2008 and that animates everyone who's using it today. So, you know, this is a Bitcoin show.

202
00:16:15,520 --> 00:16:20,400
This is primarily a Bitcoin oriented fund, Bitcoin, AI energy, whatever, Freedom Tech,

203
00:16:20,400 --> 00:16:25,440
everyone kind of think about that. But there are a lot of upshot that is all these trends that

204
00:16:25,440 --> 00:16:28,800
you're seeing that we're throwing out there right now, I think have meaningful implications for

205
00:16:28,800 --> 00:16:33,120
kind of everything that we're doing day to day. Yeah. And I think this is a good segue into the

206
00:16:33,120 --> 00:16:35,880
the Bitcoin price action Saturday into Sunday.

207
00:16:36,140 --> 00:16:39,220
I mean, probably over the last few months, I think, again,

208
00:16:39,280 --> 00:16:43,040
if you were taking a 30,000-foot view as an institutional allocator

209
00:16:43,040 --> 00:16:47,160
and looking at everything that's been playing out since Trump 2 started,

210
00:16:47,440 --> 00:16:51,200
and again, specifically since the national security strategy doc

211
00:16:51,200 --> 00:16:54,680
was published last November, it's been pretty clear

212
00:16:54,680 --> 00:16:57,680
that we've been building up towards this type of conflict.

213
00:16:57,900 --> 00:17:00,580
Again, it's clear in retrospect now that it's actually happened,

214
00:17:00,580 --> 00:17:07,180
But I think maybe the Bitcoin price action since late October, early November has probably

215
00:17:07,180 --> 00:17:13,300
been signaling that, again, Bitcoin as this liquidity alarm bell down, fell 50% between

216
00:17:13,300 --> 00:17:16,140
early November and early February.

217
00:17:16,340 --> 00:17:22,240
And then when bombs started flying on Saturday, the price fell $3,000, I believe, but then

218
00:17:22,240 --> 00:17:24,060
quickly, quickly recovered.

219
00:17:24,560 --> 00:17:29,160
And so I think the Bitcoin price action over the weekend was actually shockingly strong.

220
00:17:29,160 --> 00:17:31,940
And again, still in the midst of the fog of war.

221
00:17:32,020 --> 00:17:36,560
It's not to say that it will not go lower from here, but I thought the price held up pretty well.

222
00:17:36,800 --> 00:17:38,180
All things considered, maybe the market.

223
00:17:38,940 --> 00:17:51,680
Recognizing that we're getting into an accelerationist point in the geopolitical realm where having exposure to a neutral sound money protocol for the digital age makes a lot more sense.

224
00:17:52,320 --> 00:17:55,340
Yeah, I mean, it's, you know, again, way too early to call.

225
00:17:55,340 --> 00:17:56,580
And we're sitting here right now.

226
00:17:56,660 --> 00:17:58,720
I just checked we're above 69,000.

227
00:17:58,720 --> 00:18:03,480
And so let's see if we can kind of break above the 70K, you know, 60, 70K band that we've been in.

228
00:18:03,780 --> 00:18:11,420
But it's exactly the kind of like price action that you would want to see for kind of hammering on a bottom, right?

229
00:18:11,420 --> 00:18:17,020
Like usually the simple rule of thumb is like stuff going up that stops going up even on the basis of good news.

230
00:18:17,020 --> 00:18:26,600
Like is, you know, finding a local top and probably going to retrace and, you know, on the converse and stuff that is getting hit with more and more and more bad news and kind of just isn't going anywhere.

231
00:18:26,600 --> 00:18:30,180
tells you like a lot of the natural sellers have been exhausted and it's trying to find a bottom.

232
00:18:30,360 --> 00:18:34,520
So, you know, we don't call tops or bottoms on this show. Very much learned my lesson on that.

233
00:18:34,660 --> 00:18:40,120
But certainly that would, you know, point you in the direction of getting getting closer to the end.

234
00:18:40,120 --> 00:18:45,640
And to your point as well on Bitcoin as kind of this liquidity alarm bell or this like macro alarm bell.

235
00:18:45,900 --> 00:18:54,440
It does thus far kind of remind me of early 25. Right. With we had, if you remember, we basically topped locally at Trump's inauguration.

236
00:18:54,440 --> 00:18:57,900
And then it was like down only for three months, kind of on like no obvious news.

237
00:18:58,020 --> 00:19:00,160
And eventually the stock market kind of caught up too.

238
00:19:00,240 --> 00:19:04,280
But then it was finally the stock market really had its big puke on Liberation Day with the

239
00:19:04,280 --> 00:19:07,580
tariff announcement and Bitcoin basically went nowhere and then started to outperform

240
00:19:07,580 --> 00:19:09,840
everything more quickly and recover more quickly.

241
00:19:10,240 --> 00:19:11,320
You've seen things like that too.

242
00:19:11,460 --> 00:19:15,060
And, you know, 2022, late 22, kind of the FTX blow up.

243
00:19:15,200 --> 00:19:19,780
Like we went down like a little bit after getting killed all year and then quickly started

244
00:19:19,780 --> 00:19:21,380
like finding a bottom and moving higher.

245
00:19:21,560 --> 00:19:24,040
And despite that being like an extinction level event for crypto.

246
00:19:24,040 --> 00:19:31,140
So yeah, those are the kinds of things that I think you'd be looking for to see if maybe some of the near-term natural selling is exhausted.

247
00:19:31,760 --> 00:19:32,400
And we'll see.

248
00:19:32,760 --> 00:19:43,640
But another interesting data point as it relates to kind of like macro trends and Bitcoin price action is if you throw up the chart of the 10-year this morning, again, it's way too early to call.

249
00:19:44,160 --> 00:19:52,140
But as it relates to what the market may or may not be processing and thinking through, this is a really interesting reaction out of the 10-year.

250
00:19:52,140 --> 00:20:00,940
You know, we went down into the weekend, which is to say, you know, bonds are catching a bid, likely as people were getting more in a position for something to happen in Iran over the weekend.

251
00:20:01,840 --> 00:20:04,380
But as of this morning, we've ripped much higher.

252
00:20:04,960 --> 00:20:08,100
Granted, we're still, you know, we were at 4-2, 4-3 a few weeks ago.

253
00:20:08,200 --> 00:20:10,480
So it's kind of been a steady downtrend up until this morning.

254
00:20:10,520 --> 00:20:18,640
But it's interesting that you see kind of this rip this morning on the, you know, the confirmation of bad news and frankly, even like maybe worse news.

255
00:20:18,640 --> 00:20:48,420
I think Google might have been positioned for, you know, Trump is out there saying like, this could go on for four weeks or longer, and there could be some real American casualties. So I hope that doesn't happen. But then you're also getting, you know, oil price spiked significantly, there's been potential, like potential closure of the street form moves, you know, attacks on some ships there. So like, that could be very meaningful to oil price. And I think all that flows back into, you know, Treasury is not behaving as a safe haven asset this morning, but rather kind of repricing in potential like shock from energy prices, which

256
00:20:48,420 --> 00:20:54,400
is really not good for fixed income, especially fixed income of a very over-indebted, you know,

257
00:20:54,440 --> 00:20:59,320
sovereign that now wants to radically escalate its military spending as well, right? So if all

258
00:20:59,320 --> 00:21:03,080
that is the case and all that's playing out, the 10 years moving like this, like there's kind of

259
00:21:03,080 --> 00:21:07,380
ultimately, if this continues very, very early, like this could, you know, retrace. So let's not

260
00:21:07,380 --> 00:21:11,180
get ahead of ourselves. But like, if something like this were to continue and you still wanted

261
00:21:11,180 --> 00:21:15,480
to go do regime change in Iran and do everything else that Trump's study wants to do, there is

262
00:21:15,480 --> 00:21:16,800
ultimately one solution to this.

263
00:21:16,800 --> 00:21:17,100
Right.

264
00:21:17,140 --> 00:21:21,860
And it's, you know, getting my more accommodative fed chair to do your bidding and do what's

265
00:21:21,860 --> 00:21:32,870
necessary to kind of keep this contained Cause this can go to like four and a half five plus right Like quickly Otherwise things really start to get very hairy across various elements of what trump trying to figure out

266
00:21:32,870 --> 00:21:37,990
right now so if that's the if that's all the case again you know this is like our 14-step logic but

267
00:21:37,990 --> 00:21:43,750
that gets you back to a world where you definitely want to own some bitcoin right so again it's it's

268
00:21:43,750 --> 00:21:48,390
monday morning way too early to call but those are trends that i think are worth watching over

269
00:21:48,390 --> 00:21:49,390
over the next week or two?

270
00:21:49,470 --> 00:21:51,050
How does the 10-year react to all this?

271
00:21:51,050 --> 00:21:56,550
And is Bitcoin able to start finding some outperformance relative to other assets?

272
00:21:57,310 --> 00:21:57,410
Yeah.

273
00:21:58,190 --> 00:22:04,190
It's, I'm sorry, I've got a bit of echo, but it was crazy to see the 10-year react like

274
00:22:04,190 --> 00:22:04,570
this.

275
00:22:04,730 --> 00:22:11,970
And again, I mean, don't have to imbue my sort of political bias and perspective on war.

276
00:22:11,970 --> 00:22:20,070
But I think any, I mean, yeah, Secretary of the Department of War, Hegseth, come out this morning saying this isn't regime change.

277
00:22:20,510 --> 00:22:21,010
Don't worry.

278
00:22:21,250 --> 00:22:22,750
This is very different, very calculated.

279
00:22:23,350 --> 00:22:26,090
And again, too early to tell, yet to be determined.

280
00:22:26,350 --> 00:22:35,150
But I mean, just the pattern recognition and the cynic in me as somebody who grew up with Middle Eastern wars that the U.S. embarked on.

281
00:22:35,350 --> 00:22:38,510
I'm not going to hold my breath for this to be a quick in and out.

282
00:22:38,510 --> 00:22:43,950
Um, but other stuff happened as it pertains to the markets that we play in.

283
00:22:43,950 --> 00:22:46,670
And I think it will be remiss of us not to bring it up.

284
00:22:46,670 --> 00:22:49,710
And I think we should end it with just a little five minute conversation on this.

285
00:22:49,710 --> 00:22:54,510
But the news out of block last week, Jack Dorsey basically coming out and announcing

286
00:22:54,510 --> 00:23:00,350
that they were they they are laying off 40% of their workforce, dropping their head count

287
00:23:00,350 --> 00:23:08,350
from above 10,000 to below 6,000, citing the acceleration of the productivity of

288
00:23:08,510 --> 00:23:16,110
AI tools that they've been leveraging internally. And I think this was the first big sort of AI

289
00:23:16,110 --> 00:23:21,450
layoff headline that we've seen from a prominent tech company, Jack Dorsey, one of the most

290
00:23:21,450 --> 00:23:26,850
prominent tech founders of our time, basically pulling the Band-Aid off early and saying, hey,

291
00:23:27,210 --> 00:23:35,910
the AI tools are at a point where we can, what we believe is to safely reduce headcount,

292
00:23:35,910 --> 00:23:38,430
to run more efficiently and increase our profit margins.

293
00:23:39,070 --> 00:23:41,310
A lot of commentary on this over the weekend.

294
00:23:42,690 --> 00:23:48,750
Basically, people saying that Block's headcount became too bloated during COVID,

295
00:23:49,190 --> 00:23:51,190
where they tripled their headcount rather quickly,

296
00:23:51,690 --> 00:23:58,770
and said they're using AI productivity gains as an excuse to cut back a bloated headcount

297
00:23:58,770 --> 00:24:02,810
that was driven by mistakes made during the COVID era from a managerial perspective.

298
00:24:03,290 --> 00:24:04,690
I think it's a combination of both.

299
00:24:04,690 --> 00:24:08,630
I think they certainly were bloated, probably did overhire during COVID.

300
00:24:08,950 --> 00:24:14,290
But I think it would be idiotic to believe that they aren't leveraging these AI tools to their advantage.

301
00:24:14,450 --> 00:24:23,510
And as somebody who knows Jack, knows many people within the block organization, and having talked to them over the last year, it's become pretty clear that they are leveraging these tools internally.

302
00:24:23,830 --> 00:24:31,230
And if you just look at the pace with which the block family companies have been shipping over the last year, it has certainly increased.

303
00:24:31,230 --> 00:24:35,850
And so I think there's a case to be made on both sides of the argument.

304
00:24:35,850 --> 00:24:41,650
They probably had a bloated headcount and needed to cut it, but they're also probably

305
00:24:41,650 --> 00:24:44,350
experiencing insane productivity gains from these AI tools.

306
00:24:44,350 --> 00:24:45,350
Yeah, for sure.

307
00:24:45,350 --> 00:24:46,350
I think that's all right.

308
00:24:46,350 --> 00:24:47,350
I could assign that.

309
00:24:47,350 --> 00:24:50,250
I think it's probably reasonable to say it's a combination of those two things.

310
00:24:50,250 --> 00:24:56,110
But even if, you know, if even just a material portion of the cut is entirely related to AI

311
00:24:56,110 --> 00:24:59,230
tools, like that is, that's very meaningful.

312
00:24:59,230 --> 00:25:24,230
And I think the most interesting thing is like the stock price reaction, right? It was, you know, up 25% immediately. I don't know what the follow through has been like. I haven't checked this morning, but, you know, it closed like I believe well up 15% on the day or more. And I think that's, you know, every company is a unique case and not, not every situation is going to pour it over to the next one, you know, one to one, but that you have to think gives some CEOs with more bloated org structures ideas. Right.

313
00:25:24,230 --> 00:25:27,630
and everyone ultimately is incentivized to,

314
00:25:27,970 --> 00:25:28,790
yeah, I mean, you've got the,

315
00:25:28,930 --> 00:25:30,490
you just pulled up the data center chart here.

316
00:25:30,850 --> 00:25:32,350
This is a chart from ZeroHead

317
00:25:32,350 --> 00:25:34,170
showing the data center construction spending.

318
00:25:34,510 --> 00:25:36,870
I believe this is on like an annualized rolling

319
00:25:36,870 --> 00:25:37,930
like last 12 months basis.

320
00:25:38,190 --> 00:25:41,150
But in any case, it's now officially overtaken

321
00:25:41,150 --> 00:25:43,730
a new office spending on construction of new offices.

322
00:25:44,010 --> 00:25:45,470
And so, I mean, here's another data point

323
00:25:45,470 --> 00:25:47,650
kind of in that same direction

324
00:25:47,650 --> 00:25:50,850
that this trend is only continuing and accelerating.

325
00:25:51,430 --> 00:25:53,390
And this, for better or worse,

326
00:25:53,390 --> 00:26:00,290
AI tools, AI productivity is going to eat a greater and greater share of spend on the corporate level.

327
00:26:00,590 --> 00:26:04,110
And data center construction is eating greater and greater share of total construction spend.

328
00:26:04,610 --> 00:26:06,070
So things are moving in this one direction.

329
00:26:06,590 --> 00:26:12,670
CEOs are increasingly going to get ideas from case studies like what happened with Jack, what happened with Block.

330
00:26:12,970 --> 00:26:17,350
And that's going to have implications for hiring in the U.S., right?

331
00:26:17,430 --> 00:26:22,210
And worldwide, it's going to have implications for potentially unemployment rate, at least on a short-term basis.

332
00:26:22,210 --> 00:26:26,650
Um, we didn't even get to the, the Citrine AI apocalypse report.

333
00:26:26,650 --> 00:26:30,530
Um, we don't have time for that, but you know, that was, uh, before all the Iran stuff,

334
00:26:30,530 --> 00:26:32,590
that was the big headline, the big reason the world was going to end.

335
00:26:32,750 --> 00:26:36,590
So if you haven't read that, I would go, uh, take a minute to read it, but it's all of

336
00:26:36,590 --> 00:26:41,710
a piece where, you know, these things are happening faster than your average, you know,

337
00:26:41,710 --> 00:26:43,470
white collar worker is, is fully appreciating.

338
00:26:43,890 --> 00:26:49,310
And, you know, that's going to create, uh, some level of disruption, even if not society

339
00:26:49,310 --> 00:26:54,490
ending disruption, but some kind of, you know, ripples will come out of that that will likely

340
00:26:54,490 --> 00:26:58,950
engender some degree of policy response, which has a lot of, again, implications for all the

341
00:26:58,950 --> 00:27:03,050
things we talk about here. Yeah. And just to wrap up here, to tie it to Bitcoin too, I think

342
00:27:03,050 --> 00:27:10,690
these gross profit per employee numbers, pre and post layoffs are impressive. And I saw a chart,

343
00:27:10,750 --> 00:27:16,830
I don't think we have it here, but they're, the layoffs quickly vaulted blocks, first profit per

344
00:27:16,830 --> 00:27:22,710
employee up to NVIDIA levels. So from that perspective, they are probably one of the best

345
00:27:22,710 --> 00:27:27,230
companies, at least publicly traded. Obviously, we know Tether is probably the best edit in the world.

346
00:27:27,890 --> 00:27:31,430
They're still private right now, but with these layoffs, it seems like gross profit per person

347
00:27:31,430 --> 00:27:36,730
within block is going to skyrocket. And the point to bring this up is, I think,

348
00:27:36,730 --> 00:27:42,090
part of our thesis here at 1031 and part of why we're investing at this intersection of Bitcoin

349
00:27:42,090 --> 00:27:49,050
AI and energy is because if you're going to have the productivity gains afforded to via this AI

350
00:27:49,690 --> 00:27:55,130
sort of renaissance or this AI revolution that we're seeing, it makes sense that if you're going

351
00:27:55,130 --> 00:28:03,130
to be able to be much more profitable with a lower headcount, the Bitcoin treasury thesis becomes

352
00:28:03,130 --> 00:28:08,170
stronger because you're going to want to shovel those profits into a hard asset like Bitcoin,

353
00:28:08,170 --> 00:28:14,570
a monetary asset like Bitcoin. And so I think the era of low headcount, high productivity,

354
00:28:14,570 --> 00:28:20,090
high profit margin is upon us. And if we are entering that era, you are going to want to pair

355
00:28:20,650 --> 00:28:24,410
those productivity gains with a sound digital money, Bitcoin.

356
00:28:24,410 --> 00:28:26,090
Couldn't have said it better myself.

357
00:28:26,090 --> 00:28:28,170
We'll be back next week.