1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:06,520
One's got to be realistic and face up to the fact that the world has changed.

2
00:00:07,060 --> 00:00:12,340
And that change in the world is partly a function of China and partly a function of demographics.

3
00:00:13,160 --> 00:00:15,660
And the fact is that the West is bust.

4
00:00:16,360 --> 00:00:22,360
And, you know, the reason that the UK goes through prime ministers every two years is simply the fact there's no money left.

5
00:00:22,540 --> 00:00:26,300
They can't fulfil an agenda and they lose the confidence of their party.

6
00:00:26,420 --> 00:00:29,380
But that's the reality. And that's probably a fact across Europe as well.

7
00:00:29,380 --> 00:00:37,320
And then if you look at data that came out of the Philadelphia Fed last week, you're looking at a lot of demand growth in the US economy.

8
00:00:37,640 --> 00:00:44,980
So I think it would be absolutely madness if they tried to do anything like or even got near trying to ease policy.

9
00:00:45,140 --> 00:00:46,760
I mean, it would just be crazy.

10
00:00:47,340 --> 00:00:49,040
I don't believe that that's what they're going to do.

11
00:00:49,180 --> 00:00:56,180
I think the strength or the firmness in the US dollar is actually already telling us that that's the direction they're going in.

12
00:00:56,200 --> 00:00:57,380
They're going towards more tightness.

13
00:00:59,380 --> 00:01:06,180
Let's get into this. Michael Howell, the liquidity king. Thank you for coming on the show. It's good to speak to you.

14
00:01:06,500 --> 00:01:08,280
Well, great. Good to be here, Danny.

15
00:01:09,160 --> 00:01:17,800
I've heard a lot of good things. I know you've spoken to Nick Bartier a lot and James Lavish, the sort of macro people I speak to on the show all the time, all recommended having you on the show.

16
00:01:17,920 --> 00:01:22,340
So I'm excited about this. I don't know exactly the best place to start.

17
00:01:22,340 --> 00:01:31,240
I think maybe we should start off with why you focus so much on liquidity and what it is that means that's the thing you keep your eye on the most within the economy.

18
00:01:32,560 --> 00:01:39,760
Yeah, okay. I mean, it's a good question. I mean, the short answer is that money moves markets. And it's really as straightforward as that.

19
00:01:39,760 --> 00:01:46,640
you know broadly the way that we see things is that what starts the whole cycle or the investment

20
00:01:46,640 --> 00:01:53,440
cycle going is money flows, money coming into financial markets. Economics is downstream of

21
00:01:53,440 --> 00:01:59,980
markets and geopolitics are downstream of economics so you kind of see the sequence of

22
00:01:59,980 --> 00:02:06,140
maybe our thought process but what we really want to understand is is there money coming into markets

23
00:02:06,140 --> 00:02:11,560
or leaving markets that will effectively change transactions. One of the things you need to

24
00:02:11,560 --> 00:02:17,360
think about or conceptualize is that there are broadly speaking two big pools of money in the

25
00:02:17,360 --> 00:02:22,920
world economy. One that's in financial markets and almost a separate one that's in the real economy.

26
00:02:23,820 --> 00:02:28,600
And so many people confuse these two things. They conflate them. They think they're the same thing,

27
00:02:28,780 --> 00:02:33,180
but they're not. They're very distinct. And all money that's anywhere must be somewhere.

28
00:02:33,180 --> 00:02:40,580
so it's either in the financial sector or it's in the real economy. Generally speaking,

29
00:02:41,100 --> 00:02:47,120
as investors, we prefer it to be in the financial or asset economy than in the real economy because

30
00:02:47,120 --> 00:02:51,060
if it's in the real economy, it's just driving activity. Whereas if it's in the financial or

31
00:02:51,060 --> 00:02:55,100
asset economy, it's driving asset prices higher. And that's really what we're looking at. So

32
00:02:55,100 --> 00:02:58,120
that's, I suppose, the sort of the basic thesis.

33
00:02:58,120 --> 00:03:03,940
and when you say economics is a downstream of markets what exactly do you mean that because i

34
00:03:03,940 --> 00:03:07,900
think there's probably a lot of people out there who would think that whatever's happening in the

35
00:03:07,900 --> 00:03:11,140
economy is the thing that's driving markets maybe have that flipped the other way around

36
00:03:11,140 --> 00:03:16,560
yeah i mean see it it basically works the other way well i mean there's there are feedback effects

37
00:03:16,560 --> 00:03:21,440
there's no question but uh you know the real economy will come back and influence financial

38
00:03:21,440 --> 00:03:26,940
markets as a sort of echo effect but the first stage is that money if you think about uh if you

39
00:03:26,940 --> 00:03:33,480
said that money is the important factor that we all need to look at. I mean, I suppose in a

40
00:03:33,480 --> 00:03:39,160
capitalist system, that almost goes without saying. But the fact is that that money process

41
00:03:39,160 --> 00:03:44,780
effectively starts transactions. And typically, you've got to ask the question, how does money

42
00:03:44,780 --> 00:03:49,920
get into or get into our pockets, into our bank accounts or whatever? And it tends to move

43
00:03:49,920 --> 00:03:54,980
first through the financial system. It comes from the financial system. So it tends to stay in the

44
00:03:54,980 --> 00:04:01,440
financial system first. Then it will spill out into the real economies. That's the transmission

45
00:04:01,440 --> 00:04:07,940
mechanism. So we look for guidance as to what's happening in real economies at the financial

46
00:04:07,940 --> 00:04:13,900
sector. And it's so often the case that you've probably heard the line before that the stock

47
00:04:13,900 --> 00:04:19,960
market tends to predict what's happening in the real economy. And that's not really a prediction.

48
00:04:19,960 --> 00:04:27,500
It's more the fact that the stock market is reflecting the surge of money or the fall of money that's hitting the financial sector.

49
00:04:27,900 --> 00:04:30,880
And then there'll be an echo effect later that will affect the real economy.

50
00:04:31,140 --> 00:04:35,520
And it looks as if the stock market's been very prescient in terms of its prediction.

51
00:04:35,640 --> 00:04:39,540
But in actual fact, it's just following the money, which is the important factor here.

52
00:04:40,040 --> 00:04:49,180
So real economies tend to follow financial markets and financial markets tend to be led by liquidity or money flow.

53
00:04:49,180 --> 00:04:56,140
the traditional economic textbooks kind of have things completely arse about face so they you

54
00:04:56,140 --> 00:05:01,420
know you you wouldn't i mean you wouldn't i mean if you were studying economics i would recommend

55
00:05:01,420 --> 00:05:05,000
that people wouldn't you shouldn't pick up an economics textbook because it's it's basically

56
00:05:05,000 --> 00:05:10,540
so wrong uh you know i did uh i did economics through several degrees so i've got a phd in

57
00:05:10,540 --> 00:05:16,040
economics but i must say uh most of the stuff that i've learned about economics i learned in in

58
00:05:16,040 --> 00:05:21,440
in practice in the markets, not from picking up textbooks or understanding what academics say,

59
00:05:21,720 --> 00:05:27,500
because their view of the world is so distorted and actually so wrong that it's actually unhelpful.

60
00:05:28,640 --> 00:05:35,460
And we can have a whole episode on that. But broadly speaking, the markets are the truth

61
00:05:35,460 --> 00:05:40,900
in many ways. And to understand how the markets work, you've just got to effectively understand

62
00:05:40,900 --> 00:05:44,880
money flows. I mean, clearly there's a bit more to it than that. But that's really the essence.

63
00:05:44,880 --> 00:05:51,700
And so what you tend to find is some of the best investors are non-economists, by definition, very far from it.

64
00:05:51,760 --> 00:05:58,640
They actually have much better insight into how markets are working because they're actually using experience or in many ways common sense.

65
00:06:00,360 --> 00:06:02,300
So how have your views on economics changed then?

66
00:06:02,360 --> 00:06:04,180
So obviously you went through a lot of schooling.

67
00:06:04,600 --> 00:06:07,540
I'm sure that was mainly sort of traditional and Keynesian economics.

68
00:06:08,140 --> 00:06:11,000
Have you sort of come around to a more Austrian view of the world?

69
00:06:11,460 --> 00:06:12,860
I don't know about an Austrian view.

70
00:06:12,860 --> 00:06:34,300
I mean, I think there are flaws in both sets of theories. But I mean, the point very simply is that if you, I mean, this is where we start from, is that what you've got to try and understand is the money creation process, how money is being created in financial markets or in the world economy.

71
00:06:34,300 --> 00:06:40,820
and that money will migrate. Money is fungible. It will tend to flow to where returns are highest

72
00:06:40,820 --> 00:06:46,540
or where there are most attractive investment opportunities or buying opportunities. So that

73
00:06:46,540 --> 00:06:51,720
money will flow. But the first thing is to say is that money has to be created.

74
00:06:53,040 --> 00:06:58,380
And that money creation process has a trend to it. There's no question about that. But there's

75
00:06:58,380 --> 00:07:03,120
also a very clear cycle. And it's understanding where we are in that cycle and what's driving that

76
00:07:03,120 --> 00:07:09,380
cycle that's really very important. And, you know, you can, in many ways, dance on the head of a pin

77
00:07:09,380 --> 00:07:14,040
and say, you know, Keynesian economics is the best way of understanding it, or Austrian economics,

78
00:07:14,140 --> 00:07:20,020
or whatever it may be. But, you know, basically, we're thinking much more about cycles, which either,

79
00:07:20,240 --> 00:07:25,660
which, you know, both those two sets of views don't really, you know, explain very well. I mean,

80
00:07:25,700 --> 00:07:30,600
they're explaining disequilibria, you know, when economies have crises or whatever,

81
00:07:30,600 --> 00:07:36,360
but they're not really understanding the fact that what you see most often in markets are fairly

82
00:07:36,360 --> 00:07:43,720
regular cycles and it's a question of understanding why you get those cycles and why policymakers

83
00:07:43,720 --> 00:07:49,160
react in the way they do to certain events and you know what we're seeing now is yet another

84
00:07:49,160 --> 00:07:57,640
example in markets of a typical cycle a cycle in liquidity that cycle has been blown up since

85
00:07:57,640 --> 00:08:04,320
mid to late 2022, we've probably peaked in terms of the liquidity impetus now.

86
00:08:04,640 --> 00:08:08,920
It's beginning to roll over, but you've still got momentum in the system where asset prices

87
00:08:08,920 --> 00:08:14,780
are still rising. But very sensitive asset prices, those that are most sensitive to liquidity,

88
00:08:14,780 --> 00:08:19,520
have already been troubled. I mean, obviously, Bitcoin is one clear example,

89
00:08:20,060 --> 00:08:23,140
which is probably the most liquidity-sensitive asset on the planet.

90
00:08:23,140 --> 00:08:38,413
And then you got gold which is also very liquidity sensitive but that also having a pretty difficult time right now But these are features of the fact that liquidity is losing momentum If you already self Bitcoin you know the deal with hardware wallets

91
00:08:38,652 --> 00:08:43,053
Complex setups, clumsy interfaces, and a seed phrase that can be lost, stolen, or forgotten.

92
00:08:43,753 --> 00:08:44,652
BitKey fixes that.

93
00:08:45,313 --> 00:08:47,232
BitKey is self-custody built for real life.

94
00:08:47,452 --> 00:08:50,952
It gives you an intuitive, easy-to-use wallet with no seed phrase to sweat over.

95
00:08:50,952 --> 00:08:54,952
And it has a strong recovery system and built-in inheritance for long-term peace of mind.

96
00:08:55,673 --> 00:08:57,092
And BitKey's just had a massive upgrade.

97
00:08:57,092 --> 00:08:58,753
The new device now has a screen.

98
00:08:59,033 --> 00:09:01,913
So before you approve something, you can check it on the BitKey itself.

99
00:09:02,433 --> 00:09:04,832
The transaction, the address or any account changes.

100
00:09:05,313 --> 00:09:06,173
It's a big difference.

101
00:09:06,313 --> 00:09:07,813
You're not just trusting what's on your phone.

102
00:09:07,913 --> 00:09:09,673
You're seeing it for yourself on the device.

103
00:09:10,072 --> 00:09:12,992
It's simple, secure self-custody without the stress.

104
00:09:13,633 --> 00:09:17,972
Go to bitkey.world today and use the code WBD to get 10% off the new BitKey.

105
00:09:18,393 --> 00:09:21,572
That's bitkey.world and use the code WBD.

106
00:09:21,893 --> 00:09:24,092
Every Bitcoiner eventually has to answer one question.

107
00:09:24,092 --> 00:09:26,732
If something happened to me, would my family know what to do?

108
00:09:27,092 --> 00:09:29,053
Could my wife or parents recover my Bitcoin?

109
00:09:29,513 --> 00:09:31,133
And would my children inherit the Bitcoin

110
00:09:31,133 --> 00:09:32,293
that I spent years stacking?

111
00:09:32,893 --> 00:09:35,092
That's where AnchorWatch builds Bitcoin custody models

112
00:09:35,092 --> 00:09:37,293
to protect you and your family against real life,

113
00:09:37,753 --> 00:09:41,013
accidents, errors, kidnappings, and even your own death.

114
00:09:41,633 --> 00:09:43,293
Every AnchorWatch custody solution

115
00:09:43,293 --> 00:09:44,893
includes their inheritance protocol.

116
00:09:45,393 --> 00:09:46,992
Designed so when the unthinkable happens,

117
00:09:47,112 --> 00:09:49,152
your Bitcoin reaches the people you intended it for.

118
00:09:49,633 --> 00:09:50,933
Whether you're a self-custody expert

119
00:09:50,933 --> 00:09:52,852
or want multi-institutional support,

120
00:09:53,053 --> 00:09:55,352
your Bitcoin estate plan shouldn't be an afterthought.

121
00:09:56,072 --> 00:09:57,633
Bitcoin is only generational wealth

122
00:09:57,633 --> 00:09:59,992
if it can actually be passed down through the generations.

123
00:10:00,393 --> 00:10:02,272
So make sure they can access in the future

124
00:10:02,272 --> 00:10:03,492
what you've built today.

125
00:10:04,232 --> 00:10:06,133
Anchor Watch is your custody, your way.

126
00:10:06,553 --> 00:10:08,372
Visit anchorwatch.com to get started.

127
00:10:08,712 --> 00:10:10,212
That's anchorwatch.com.

128
00:10:10,813 --> 00:10:12,053
If you own a Bitcoin ETF,

129
00:10:12,313 --> 00:10:13,452
especially if it's GBTC,

130
00:10:13,692 --> 00:10:14,673
you need to listen up.

131
00:10:15,313 --> 00:10:17,933
Spot Bitcoin ETFs provide price exposure to Bitcoin,

132
00:10:18,092 --> 00:10:19,212
not direct ownership.

133
00:10:19,592 --> 00:10:20,572
You can't withdraw it,

134
00:10:20,673 --> 00:10:21,732
you can't self-custody it,

135
00:10:21,732 --> 00:10:24,112
and they charge you a management fee every year to hold it.

136
00:10:24,112 --> 00:10:29,313
Well, Swan recently announced Swan Real Bitcoin Exchange and it's ready to use right now.

137
00:10:30,112 --> 00:10:35,753
RBX is a structured in-kind exchange that converts your spot Bitcoin ETF shares into real on-chain Bitcoin.

138
00:10:36,053 --> 00:10:40,293
It does that without selling on the open market and is designed to support a tax-efficient outcome.

139
00:10:40,913 --> 00:10:46,212
So, for example, if you hold GBTC, you're paying 1.5% a year in management fees for Bitcoin price exposure.

140
00:10:46,212 --> 00:10:53,852
But by swapping GBTC for real Bitcoin with RBX, you can drop that figure as low as 0% by just holding it in self-custody.

141
00:10:54,112 --> 00:10:59,772
This is designed in a way that maintains your cost basis and in a manner that supports the deferral of capital gains tax.

142
00:11:00,212 --> 00:11:06,413
So if you own a Bitcoin ETF, especially if it's GBTC, you need to talk to Swan Private about RBX today.

143
00:11:06,933 --> 00:11:11,072
Head over to swan.com forward slash WBD and book in a call with one of their team.

144
00:11:11,332 --> 00:11:14,712
That's swan.com forward slash WBD.

145
00:11:15,533 --> 00:11:19,112
I definitely do want to get into sort of where we are in this liquidity cycle.

146
00:11:19,112 --> 00:11:23,413
because Luke Groman, who has been on the show a few times, he calls Bitcoin the last functioning

147
00:11:23,413 --> 00:11:27,652
smoke alarm of liquidity. And I've listened to a lot of your work and I know you've said that

148
00:11:27,652 --> 00:11:32,192
liquidity probably rolled over towards the back end of last year. But before we get into sort of

149
00:11:32,192 --> 00:11:37,072
where we are now, can you just explain what drives these cycles? Like as liquidity ebbs and flows,

150
00:11:37,212 --> 00:11:44,892
where is it going to and where is it coming from? Okay. Well, I mean, the answer is actually a

151
00:11:44,892 --> 00:11:50,952
complicated one, but let me try and make it more straightforward by saying, let's say that the main

152
00:11:50,952 --> 00:11:56,033
driver are central banks. I mean, there's obviously a lot more going into it than that,

153
00:11:56,272 --> 00:11:59,952
but let's say it's central banks. I mean, central banks clearly play a very big role.

154
00:12:00,352 --> 00:12:05,392
There are other factors which can influence private sector behaviour in terms of liquidity

155
00:12:05,392 --> 00:12:10,673
creation, but for the moment, let's say it's central banks. So the central banks will begin

156
00:12:10,673 --> 00:12:16,793
to ease policy. Now, what could drive them to ease policy? It could be an external shock,

157
00:12:17,452 --> 00:12:24,232
such as the COVID emergency. It could be a financial crisis like the GFC,

158
00:12:24,652 --> 00:12:28,352
but their response basically is to come in and throw liquidity at markets.

159
00:12:29,053 --> 00:12:32,572
Now, one of the reasons for that, and perhaps the fundamental reason,

160
00:12:32,992 --> 00:12:38,612
is they're not necessarily at the first instance trying to revive economic activity.

161
00:12:38,612 --> 00:12:42,572
what they're trying to do is to bail out the system and maybe bail out the banks

162
00:12:42,572 --> 00:12:51,173
because ultimately financial crises and let's throw covid into that same pot that they're really

163
00:12:51,173 --> 00:12:59,112
refinancing crises and it comes back to the fact that debt is a paramount issue and a major problem

164
00:12:59,112 --> 00:13:05,272
in the world economy right now we have way way too much debt and when i said that if you go back

165
00:13:05,272 --> 00:13:11,973
to economic textbooks, and economic textbooks are wrong or at least misleading, they tend to

166
00:13:11,973 --> 00:13:18,053
depict financial markets as being new capital raising mechanisms. In other words, that if you're

167
00:13:18,053 --> 00:13:24,433
a corporation and you spy some wonderful investment opportunity, what you're going to do is to go to

168
00:13:24,433 --> 00:13:28,952
the capital market, you're going to raise new money, you're going to take that money, and you're

169
00:13:28,952 --> 00:13:34,072
going to invest in new capex, you know, planted equipment or buildings or whatever it may be,

170
00:13:34,072 --> 00:13:40,652
a new enterprise. Well, that's a great idea, but it doesn't really work. It's not really what's

171
00:13:40,652 --> 00:13:46,413
happening now. There's not much of this going on. Now, I would say I'll come quietly and say,

172
00:13:46,512 --> 00:13:51,752
well, okay, I accept the fact that maybe the AI boom is creating this sort of temporary surge in

173
00:13:51,752 --> 00:13:57,572
capital investment. But this has been an unusual phenomenon over the course of the last 10 or 15

174
00:13:57,572 --> 00:14:03,313
years. We haven't really had that much capex going on in Western economies. Most of the capex

175
00:14:03,313 --> 00:14:07,753
that's been undertaken in the world economy as operating in China, and they're clearly not

176
00:14:07,753 --> 00:14:12,473
operating with the same model. This is state-directed investment. So you've got to say

177
00:14:12,473 --> 00:14:18,212
that the textbook model is incorrect. So what are capital markets in the West doing most of the time?

178
00:14:18,513 --> 00:14:23,192
They're refinancing existing debts. They're rolling over debts. And given the fact that

179
00:14:23,192 --> 00:14:30,253
we've got this huge pile of debt, $350 to $400 trillion of debt, with an average maturity

180
00:14:30,253 --> 00:14:38,192
are probably about five years or so. What you're doing is you're rolling over $70,

181
00:14:38,293 --> 00:14:45,692
$75 trillion of debt every year, which is a phenomenal amount of debt roll. And to do that,

182
00:14:45,793 --> 00:14:51,092
you need capacity in the financial sector. You need balance sheet capacity for the intermediaries

183
00:14:51,092 --> 00:14:55,572
to do that. Now, if that breaks down and you haven't got the financial capacity, you're going

184
00:14:55,572 --> 00:15:00,233
to get a financial crisis. So I come back to the shock and say, well, okay, what you've got is a

185
00:15:00,233 --> 00:15:06,492
financial crisis you can't refinance the debt in a capitalist a modern capitalist system where you

186
00:15:06,492 --> 00:15:14,072
have uh where we're credit money we're in a credit money world you simply cannot default debt because

187
00:15:14,072 --> 00:15:20,392
debt is the collateral that's used to basically support the new lending um a lot of lending in

188
00:15:20,392 --> 00:15:25,772
fact something like 70 80 percent of all lending now is collateral based in other words you need

189
00:15:25,772 --> 00:15:32,212
some sort of asset to borrow against. And the bizarre thing is that that asset tends to be an

190
00:15:32,212 --> 00:15:38,473
old debt. In other words, a treasury debt or gilt-edged security or whatever it may be.

191
00:15:38,852 --> 00:15:44,253
So you simply can't default these things. So you basically have to provide liquidity

192
00:15:44,253 --> 00:15:50,652
so the refinancing process can continue. And that's basically the central bank's response

193
00:15:50,652 --> 00:15:58,473
to all financial crises or all of these problems that we see, the tensions in financial markets.

194
00:15:58,692 --> 00:16:04,192
They'll come in on that ad liquidity. That's their ultimate remit. Now, there's other things

195
00:16:04,192 --> 00:16:08,772
they say, oh, of course, we're in the business to control inflation or improve employment. But

196
00:16:08,772 --> 00:16:14,673
the fundamental factor is basically to make sure that debt refinancing continues. And that's what

197
00:16:14,673 --> 00:16:20,913
they do. So if you look at the COVID emergency or you look at the GFC, central banks came in and

198
00:16:20,913 --> 00:16:27,472
poured money into the system. That money inflated asset markets. Liquidity is fungible. So once it

199
00:16:27,472 --> 00:16:33,793
facilitated the debt rolls, it was still there. It basically spilled out into other areas. It

200
00:16:33,793 --> 00:16:40,553
migrated into other risk assets, corporate bonds, equities, et cetera. And it began to inflate

201
00:16:40,553 --> 00:16:47,492
asset markets generally. It's what we loosely call the everything bubble. A good barometer of that,

202
00:16:48,392 --> 00:16:55,673
as you noted, as Luke Roman has said, as we say, is the great barometer is Bitcoin or traditional

203
00:16:55,673 --> 00:17:00,892
monetary inflation hedges like gold. And they clearly witnessed a strong bid during those

204
00:17:00,892 --> 00:17:11,485
periods where liquidity was abundant Now liquidity will then spill out into the real economy ultimately because what you got then is a situation where wealth affects because people

205
00:17:11,485 --> 00:17:17,065
feel wealthier, et cetera, et cetera. They can spend more money. Consumer spending goes up.

206
00:17:18,065 --> 00:17:22,685
The consumer spending may induce further investment spending, et cetera. And then the

207
00:17:22,685 --> 00:17:28,625
real economy gets momentum. Now, as the real economy gets momentum, it will require more

208
00:17:28,625 --> 00:17:33,805
liquidity to keep going. And so it will start to suck liquidity out of the financial sector.

209
00:17:34,265 --> 00:17:40,465
So what you see is the upswing of a liquidity cycle caused by central banks trying to reliquify

210
00:17:40,465 --> 00:17:45,085
the system. And then ultimately, that money's spilling into the real economy and the financial

211
00:17:45,085 --> 00:17:51,645
sector being then or then losing liquidity to a then-born real economy. So one of the things that

212
00:17:51,645 --> 00:17:57,885
you tend to find is a paradoxical feature that strong economies rarely have strong financial

213
00:17:57,885 --> 00:18:03,445
markets. And strong financial markets are often associated with weak economies. And many people,

214
00:18:03,785 --> 00:18:06,945
you know, in Main Street, scratch their head and think, well, we can't get our head around this,

215
00:18:06,945 --> 00:18:11,905
seems to be bizarre. But that's why that works, because you've got these two very separate pots

216
00:18:11,905 --> 00:18:16,365
of money. And it's a question of understanding the sequences. So that's broadly one of the reasons

217
00:18:16,365 --> 00:18:20,925
why you see these cycles. Now, there are other reasons that can come in. It may be that central

218
00:18:20,925 --> 00:18:26,365
banks then get, you know, get concerned about inflationary pressures. And if inflation picks

219
00:18:26,365 --> 00:18:32,025
up because of a strong economy, they will actually initiate a further tightening in financial markets

220
00:18:32,025 --> 00:18:37,785
and that will then cause a bigger cycle. And then we'll get debt refinancing problems because money

221
00:18:37,785 --> 00:18:42,665
in the financial sector is so short and then they'll have to come back in again. So you sort

222
00:18:42,665 --> 00:18:48,485
of see the idea. I mean, we just go 360 degrees round again. And so the cycle continues.

223
00:18:49,925 --> 00:18:54,705
So I know that you've been tracking global equity for quite a long time now. As we get further and

224
00:18:54,705 --> 00:18:59,445
further into this sort of debt spiral that we're in, do you find that the peaks and troughs either

225
00:18:59,445 --> 00:19:05,445
become higher and lower or is the cycle shortening as the debt gets more and more unmanageable?

226
00:19:06,305 --> 00:19:10,605
Well, it's a very good question. I mean, I wish I could be definitive here, but it's very difficult.

227
00:19:10,605 --> 00:19:17,485
I mean, the first point to say is that one of the things that you are seeing is an exponential rise

228
00:19:17,485 --> 00:19:26,945
in debt. And that is almost an arithmetic point, simply because the debt to GDP ratios of most

229
00:19:26,945 --> 00:19:33,265
economies are growing now. They're over 100% in many, many cases. And that means that once

230
00:19:33,265 --> 00:19:40,805
your interest payments start to get of a significant size, the whole thing begins to

231
00:19:40,805 --> 00:19:46,425
compound viciously and you get this sort of exponential growth. And so in order to sort of

232
00:19:46,425 --> 00:19:53,205
to cap the growth of debt, governments will have to go back to fiscal surplus. There's just no

233
00:19:53,205 --> 00:19:55,105
chance of that happening at all. No chance.

234
00:19:55,385 --> 00:20:01,325
Demands for welfare spending or whatever it may be. And the whole welfare system in the West needs

235
00:20:01,325 --> 00:20:10,185
to be radically reformed because it's going to bankrupt countries. And so anyway, that's another

236
00:20:10,185 --> 00:20:15,805
rabbit hole we can go down. But the point being here is that debt is growing exponentially. And

237
00:20:15,805 --> 00:20:21,665
therefore you need liquidity to grow exponentially on top of that. Now, given the fact that liquidity

238
00:20:21,665 --> 00:20:26,965
tends not to grow exponentially, it tends to be more cyclical than exponential, you can see why

239
00:20:26,965 --> 00:20:38,505
you get these financial crises. Now, it would be a nice thing to say that as the world moves on,

240
00:20:38,825 --> 00:20:44,305
you tend to get bigger and bigger financial crises, and you tend to get them more frequently.

241
00:20:44,305 --> 00:20:49,705
that's not always the case i mean i think you can see those tensions building and then being

242
00:20:49,705 --> 00:20:55,965
dissipated um you know at different times you don't always every crisis every subsequent crisis

243
00:20:55,965 --> 00:21:01,885
is not necessarily bigger um but they they're certainly they they tend to have a fairly

244
00:21:01,885 --> 00:21:08,365
constant frequency i mean if you look at our liquidity cycle for example that liquidity

245
00:21:08,365 --> 00:21:16,485
cycle tends to move with an average frequency of about five to six years. Now, why does it move

246
00:21:16,485 --> 00:21:21,525
with a five to six year cycle? The reason for that, and by the way, that's a big contrast to

247
00:21:21,525 --> 00:21:26,805
what people normally cite as a Bitcoin cycle, which is four years, which I don't believe there's

248
00:21:26,805 --> 00:21:31,685
a four year cycle in Bitcoin. I think there's a five to six year liquidity cycle. And my view is

249
00:21:31,685 --> 00:21:37,385
that that liquidity cycle is dominating things like Bitcoin, gold, etc. Now, that five to six

250
00:21:37,385 --> 00:21:43,705
year cycle is occurring because the average maturity of debt in the world economy is about

251
00:21:43,705 --> 00:21:48,265
that tanner. It's about five to six years. And so what you're looking at is ultimately a debt

252
00:21:48,265 --> 00:21:53,205
refinancing cycle as I've described. So I think that's why you get them. So there is a fairly

253
00:21:53,205 --> 00:22:01,945
constant frequency. I don't think cycles are becoming more shorter or more frequent. I think

254
00:22:01,945 --> 00:22:08,445
there's a fairly constant cycle. And you can see at different times, depending on the background,

255
00:22:08,825 --> 00:22:14,565
that those tensions are dissipated sometimes. And at other times, they express themselves in a big

256
00:22:14,565 --> 00:22:22,305
crisis. So is the next crisis going to be bigger than 2008? I'm not sure. There's clearly a case

257
00:22:22,305 --> 00:22:27,685
for that. But it's very difficult to say at this time. It depends on the speed of response of

258
00:22:27,685 --> 00:22:33,165
policymakers. It's interesting. I agree with you that Bitcoin doesn't have a four-year cycle. I

259
00:22:33,165 --> 00:22:37,345
just can't believe there's something special about every 4th October that means Bitcoin has

260
00:22:37,345 --> 00:22:41,125
to crash. But if it did fit into this liquidity cycle, that would give a nice reason that I could

261
00:22:41,125 --> 00:22:48,205
actually understand. So last October, obviously, Bitcoin topped. And I think that coincided with

262
00:22:48,205 --> 00:22:54,725
what you said was the top of the liquidity cycle. Is that right? Correct. Okay. So where are we in

263
00:22:54,725 --> 00:23:01,025
that cycle now and what do you expect to come next? Okay, well, let me see if I can transfer

264
00:23:01,025 --> 00:23:09,545
to some slides. So what this is showing is the global liquidity cycle as we think of it. And what

265
00:23:09,545 --> 00:23:17,725
this is showing is the black line is a rate of change of liquidity through financial markets.

266
00:23:17,725 --> 00:23:36,985
So this is using data, goes all the way back to 1965. It's using data from about 90 economies worldwide. And for each country, we're looking at about 30 different data series. So it's a very comprehensive analysis of liquidity worldwide.

267
00:23:36,985 --> 00:23:44,445
and the black line as i said is measuring a rate of change of liquidity so it's not a level and when

268
00:23:44,445 --> 00:23:49,305
we say that liquidity has peaked we're talking about the rate of change we're not talking about

269
00:23:49,305 --> 00:23:56,005
the level of liquidity just to be clear about that okay now what we've put on top of that cycle

270
00:23:56,005 --> 00:24:03,305
is uh on the top of the black line is a sine wave which for those that are mathematically inclined

271
00:24:03,305 --> 00:24:10,085
has been estimated using Fourier analysis. And that was done actually in year 2000, so

272
00:24:10,085 --> 00:24:17,625
25, 26 years ago. And we haven't changed it since then. And we've just run that sine wave on.

273
00:24:18,245 --> 00:24:19,505
Wow, it's pretty accurate.

274
00:24:20,265 --> 00:24:25,185
Yeah, what you see is what you get. So it's either works or it doesn't, but it seems to be pretty good.

275
00:24:25,185 --> 00:24:34,405
and that analysis was our attempt some years ago to do this. An institution called the Foundation

276
00:24:34,405 --> 00:24:40,025
for the Study of Cycles in the US actually asked for our data last year and they said they'd like

277
00:24:40,025 --> 00:24:46,985
to do a more thorough rigorous analysis because they study cycles in depth and they've got much

278
00:24:46,985 --> 00:24:54,105
better algorithms than we have and they came away looked at the data and came back and said yep we

279
00:24:54,105 --> 00:24:59,445
find it's 65 months too. It seems to be pretty standard and doesn't seem to have changed since

280
00:24:59,445 --> 00:25:05,225
you first estimated it. So that's kind of reassuring. And that's the movement of the cycle.

281
00:25:05,225 --> 00:25:13,585
What you see, as you noted, is that that cycle peaked at the end of Q3 last year. It had

282
00:25:13,585 --> 00:25:22,445
previously bottomed in September of 2022. And that upswing in liquidity has clearly launched

283
00:25:22,445 --> 00:25:29,545
what we've also called the everything bubble. So that's been an important factor in this story.

284
00:25:30,525 --> 00:25:49,498
And it looks as if which is the less good news is that that cycle is going to bottom sometime probably in 2027 and probably the second half of 2027 if I honest So you know we may have some way to go yet And that really the problem that we

285
00:25:49,498 --> 00:25:58,537
face. Now, what about the relationship to things like Bitcoin or crypto? Let me just try and see

286
00:25:58,537 --> 00:26:07,737
if I can show that. Now, so what that shows is the black line is the movements in global

287
00:26:07,737 --> 00:26:14,358
equality on a much higher frequency basis. So what that's doing is looking at six-week changes. Now,

288
00:26:15,258 --> 00:26:22,918
you may well ask, well, why six weeks? And the reason is that basically is a small filter that

289
00:26:22,918 --> 00:26:28,078
gets rid of noise in the data, because looking at week-on-week changes would be hugely noisy.

290
00:26:28,078 --> 00:26:33,258
There'd be no signal there. And a six-week change is basically getting rid of a lot of the noise.

291
00:26:33,717 --> 00:26:39,838
There's still noise in that, but most of it's disappeared. The orange line is looking at a

292
00:26:39,838 --> 00:26:49,178
basket of crypto. So we have this basket we call BES, which is essentially Bitcoin 60%,

293
00:26:49,178 --> 00:26:57,618
Ethereum 30%, and Solana 10% as a sort of broad brush index of crypto. And again,

294
00:26:57,618 --> 00:27:04,378
that six-week changes, the black data series has been advanced by three months, i.e. 13 weeks,

295
00:27:04,438 --> 00:27:10,277
so it's predictive. And that's the tracking that you get. Now, again, what you see is what you get.

296
00:27:11,098 --> 00:27:18,518
We've been using this consistently for many years now, trying to predict what happens in crypto.

297
00:27:18,518 --> 00:27:28,158
the correlation over that period has been about 0.55 or actually higher than 0.55

298
00:27:28,158 --> 00:27:36,477
so in other words an r squared of about over over 0.3 which is pretty good for any financial series

299
00:27:36,477 --> 00:27:45,977
and its latest data is basically showing as you can see this sort of sluggishness if you like in

300
00:27:45,977 --> 00:27:51,578
crypto prices, which is completely consistent with the fact that liquidity is slowed down.

301
00:27:53,237 --> 00:27:55,938
And with gold, would that look very similar to this?

302
00:27:57,797 --> 00:28:02,717
Yes, it would. I mean, there are different dynamics that are going on here.

303
00:28:04,338 --> 00:28:10,678
And one of the things that is, I mean, I don't really get caught in the weeds too much,

304
00:28:10,758 --> 00:28:15,258
but one of the things that we tend to find is that if you look at, I mean, this is maybe not a,

305
00:28:15,258 --> 00:28:28,898
This is not rocket science in the sense that the US dollar area and the Federal Reserve is by definition going to be a lot more important in terms of driving cryptocurrencies than, say, China.

306
00:28:29,138 --> 00:28:33,057
Because in China, you can't buy. It's illegal to buy crypto.

307
00:28:33,858 --> 00:28:40,537
So the PBOC, the People's Bank, which is driving Chinese liquidity, is not going to have any effect on this, or certainly not directly.

308
00:28:41,658 --> 00:28:44,498
So they tend to have more of their influence on gold.

309
00:28:44,498 --> 00:28:52,898
So if I shift to, probably get there if you just bear with me, there's a chart a little bit later I've got which will show this.

310
00:28:53,717 --> 00:29:01,197
This is the relationship between PBOC is the People's Bank of China, and this is gold.

311
00:29:01,878 --> 00:29:11,858
Now, there are a lot of other things going on on gold, affecting gold, central bank purchases, other liquidity, other countries' liquidity, etc.

312
00:29:11,858 --> 00:29:31,158
But you can see that China, just eyeballing that chart, China has quite a big effect on the gold price. And this is illustrating, again, six-week changes to remove the noise, that the PBOC tends to have an impact about two, two and a half months ahead of what happens in gold.

313
00:29:31,158 --> 00:29:42,378
Now, there's a story associated with this chart, which is why we put it up, is that what you've seen over recent weeks is gold weakness.

314
00:29:43,297 --> 00:29:51,618
Now, this is the long-term relationship between PBOC liquidity and the gold bullion price.

315
00:29:51,618 --> 00:30:08,957
Now, this is, I know, a step to the side from Bitcoin and crypto, but it's actually very important in this context to try and understand what's going on because both of these asset classes, precious metals and crypto, are monetary inflation hedges, and they haven't always been aligned over the last few months.

316
00:30:09,578 --> 00:30:18,498
Now, what this chart is illustrating is that people's bank liquidity, the black line, is driving the gold bullion market.

317
00:30:19,098 --> 00:30:33,158
And that's something which is kind of counterintuitive or maybe counterintuitive to a lot of people who have been arguing that the great debasement trade is really what has explained the rising gold certainly over the last year or so.

318
00:30:33,598 --> 00:30:37,697
Now, our point is that the great debasement hasn't really happened yet.

319
00:30:37,697 --> 00:30:42,537
I mean, okay, it's out there. It's going to happen. The challenge for Western countries

320
00:30:42,537 --> 00:30:48,557
is that debt is going to explode exponentially and they will have to monetize and that will

321
00:30:48,557 --> 00:30:55,477
undermine Western financial systems and it will mean monetary inflation in large size.

322
00:30:56,018 --> 00:31:01,158
But it's only China who's really doing it at the moment. And it's very hard to see what China's

323
00:31:01,158 --> 00:31:06,977
doing because they've got capital controls on and money is not allowed to leave or it's not

324
00:31:06,977 --> 00:31:15,217
leaving very easily. And Chinese investors or Chinese residents only vent really for this

325
00:31:15,217 --> 00:31:21,197
excess liquidity is precious metals. And they can put it into the stock market or real estate,

326
00:31:21,377 --> 00:31:27,438
but this is where most Chinese would tend to think about monetary inflation hedges would be

327
00:31:27,438 --> 00:31:32,277
buying gold, and that's what they're doing. So China has to get rid of its big debt problem,

328
00:31:32,277 --> 00:31:53,797
And the only thing it can do is to devalue the yuan domestically against gold. And the reason that they're controlling the gold market, but they've banned people buying crypto because they've realized that that's a very easy way, a very easy conduit for money to leave China. So that's not allowed.

329
00:31:53,797 --> 00:32:05,098
Now, if we go back to an earlier slide, this one, you'll see that there's an interesting conspiracy notion going on here.

330
00:32:05,598 --> 00:32:15,178
This is the data on that previous chart blown up for what's happened over the last few weeks.

331
00:32:15,898 --> 00:32:18,477
And this is the level of Chinese liquidity.

332
00:32:18,477 --> 00:32:27,057
and you can see that almost coincident with the beginning of tensions in Iran,

333
00:32:27,697 --> 00:32:30,438
China basically hit the brakes.

334
00:32:31,098 --> 00:32:33,037
And this is the amount of liquidity in their system.

335
00:32:33,098 --> 00:32:34,138
This is the absolute level.

336
00:32:34,777 --> 00:32:39,678
So the year-on-year growth will actually see a dramatic drop, which it has done.

337
00:32:40,037 --> 00:32:41,318
In fact, I can illustrate that.

338
00:32:41,318 --> 00:32:45,477
You can see the year-on-year drop in terms of Chinese liquidity growth

339
00:32:45,477 --> 00:32:53,078
after this big, big surge through 23, 24, 25. They hit the brakes. Why have they hit the brakes?

340
00:32:53,537 --> 00:33:00,717
They hit the brakes basically because of the Iranian tensions. And they wanted to slow the

341
00:33:00,717 --> 00:33:07,158
Chinese economy down to reduce oil imports during this difficult period. And that's what they've

342
00:33:07,158 --> 00:33:12,977
done. And it looks as if, although the MOU between America and Iran may have just been ripped up,

343
00:33:12,977 --> 00:33:19,178
But it looks as if they restarted their liquidity injections around the time of the MOU signing.

344
00:33:19,818 --> 00:33:26,078
Now, okay, two swallows don't make a summer, but this is not bad evidence to say something's

345
00:33:26,078 --> 00:33:26,758
been going on.

346
00:33:27,338 --> 00:33:32,277
And that may explain gold, and it may explain why you could be seeing over coming weeks

347
00:33:32,277 --> 00:33:37,018
some stabilisation in the gold market if they start to push more liquidity back at the system.

348
00:33:37,498 --> 00:33:42,617
So that's a long-winded way of explaining the role of gold and China in this.

349
00:33:42,977 --> 00:33:45,297
You wouldn't reuse a Bitcoin address,

350
00:33:45,297 --> 00:33:48,518
so why does your phone broadcast the same identifier for life?

351
00:33:48,518 --> 00:33:51,138
Every SIM has a static ID and carriers,

352
00:33:51,138 --> 00:33:54,057
ad networks and bad actors all use it to track you.

353
00:33:54,057 --> 00:33:57,658
The big carriers have been caught selling that data over and over again.

354
00:33:57,658 --> 00:34:00,518
Cape is America's privacy first mobile carrier.

355
00:34:00,518 --> 00:34:04,318
Their identifier rotation feature changes your ID every 24 hours,

356
00:34:04,318 --> 00:34:07,057
so you look like a different subscriber every single day.

357
00:34:07,057 --> 00:34:08,877
And SIM swaps are off the table.

358
00:34:08,877 --> 00:34:12,578
Your number can't move without a 24 word phrase that only you hold.

359
00:34:12,624 --> 00:34:17,384
There's also no name at sign up, no social security number, and there's no profile to build on you.

360
00:34:17,824 --> 00:34:21,584
If you're a Bitcoiner in America, I honestly don't know why you'd use any other network.

361
00:34:21,844 --> 00:34:28,444
You can head over to cape.co forward slash WBD and use the code WBD for 33% off your first six months.

362
00:34:28,884 --> 00:34:32,824
That's C-A-P-E dot co forward slash WBD.

363
00:34:32,964 --> 00:34:36,124
If you hold Bitcoin long enough, there's going to come a time when you need some dollars.

364
00:34:36,444 --> 00:34:39,364
It might be a tax bill, a business expense, life getting in the way,

365
00:34:39,564 --> 00:34:42,604
but whatever it is, it might come at a time when you don't want to sell your Bitcoin.

366
00:34:43,144 --> 00:34:44,344
That's where Ledin comes in.

367
00:34:44,744 --> 00:34:46,584
Ledin lets you borrow against your Bitcoin instead

368
00:34:46,584 --> 00:34:49,124
with tiered rates that go as low as 9.25%.

369
00:34:49,124 --> 00:34:51,964
So you don't have to sell your stack if you don't want to.

370
00:34:52,704 --> 00:34:54,964
Ledin have operated through every market cycle since 2018

371
00:34:54,964 --> 00:34:57,724
and have originated over $11 billion in loans.

372
00:34:58,044 --> 00:35:00,464
But the important part for me is the way Ledin handles these loans.

373
00:35:00,804 --> 00:35:03,864
Your collateral is held in custody and never lent out to generate interest.

374
00:35:04,884 --> 00:35:06,284
And Ledin's more than just loans.

375
00:35:06,664 --> 00:35:08,924
Tether Gold is now live alongside your Bitcoin

376
00:35:08,924 --> 00:35:10,924
with instant trading across 10 pairs.

377
00:35:10,924 --> 00:35:14,704
and later this year you'll be able to borrow against gold in the same way that you do with

378
00:35:14,704 --> 00:35:19,524
Bitcoin. Ledin really is an awesome company. I've used them multiple times. The applications have

379
00:35:19,524 --> 00:35:23,004
taken me less than 15 minutes and you have the dollars in your account within hours.

380
00:35:23,424 --> 00:35:30,104
If you want to check out Ledin, go to ledn.io and use the code WBD for 0.25% off your first loan.

381
00:35:30,584 --> 00:35:35,904
That's ledn.io and use the code WBD. Do you want to pay less in taxes and stack more Bitcoin?

382
00:35:35,904 --> 00:35:41,384
Of course you do. Well, by mining Bitcoin with Blockware, you can. Under section 168k of the

383
00:35:41,384 --> 00:35:47,004
US tax code, Bitcoin mining servers qualify for 100% bonus depreciation. This means every dollar

384
00:35:47,004 --> 00:35:51,084
you spend on miners can directly offset your income in a single year. And it's true for both

385
00:35:51,084 --> 00:35:56,024
business owners and W2 earners. So if you have $100,000 in ordinary income, you can purchase

386
00:35:56,024 --> 00:36:01,844
$100,000 in miners and potentially offset your tax liability entirely. Blockware's mining as a

387
00:36:01,844 --> 00:36:05,944
service does all the heavy lifting. They secure the rigs, they source the low-cost power, and they

388
00:36:05,944 --> 00:36:10,704
handle all the day-to-day maintenance. So you get to stack Bitcoin every single day while drastically

389
00:36:10,704 --> 00:36:16,204
shrinking your tax bill. Get started today at blockwaresolutions.com forward slash WBD and use

390
00:36:16,204 --> 00:36:22,464
code WBD for $100 off your first miner. That's blockwaresolutions.com forward slash WBD.

391
00:36:23,524 --> 00:36:28,764
Yeah, that's interesting. And it's one of the reasons that China has such an impact on gold

392
00:36:28,764 --> 00:36:31,984
that they're moving away from holding things like US treasuries

393
00:36:31,984 --> 00:36:33,984
and moving to hold more and more gold.

394
00:36:35,144 --> 00:36:38,304
Yeah, that's a slightly different point because that's officially.

395
00:36:39,424 --> 00:36:42,704
That's what the Chinese state is doing.

396
00:36:43,084 --> 00:36:46,544
But the big buyers of gold are retail investors largely.

397
00:36:47,024 --> 00:36:48,344
The central bank's also buying gold.

398
00:36:48,404 --> 00:36:49,544
There's no question about that.

399
00:36:49,844 --> 00:36:53,744
But we're looking here at the role of the Shanghai Gold Exchange

400
00:36:53,744 --> 00:36:57,584
and basically retail demand across China,

401
00:36:57,584 --> 00:37:03,724
which is a much, much, much bigger source of buying. But notwithstanding, I mean, you're correct

402
00:37:03,724 --> 00:37:09,224
to say that this is also happening in the background and that clearly is also impacting

403
00:37:09,224 --> 00:37:15,444
the gold price. Okay, interesting. So when the liquidity rolled over end of last year,

404
00:37:15,644 --> 00:37:20,124
Bitcoin obviously fell off a cliff. Is this one of the things where Bitcoin will react very violently,

405
00:37:20,244 --> 00:37:27,124
very quickly to liquidity rolling over? And what will happen next? Is it going to be more downside

406
00:37:27,124 --> 00:37:28,104
for Bitcoin in your opinion?

407
00:37:28,264 --> 00:37:28,884
Or do you think,

408
00:37:28,944 --> 00:37:30,324
does it sort of stabilize here

409
00:37:30,324 --> 00:37:31,564
and wait for liquidity to come back?

410
00:37:32,204 --> 00:37:32,944
Well, I think that,

411
00:37:34,024 --> 00:37:34,804
I mean, put it this way.

412
00:37:34,884 --> 00:37:35,984
I think the first thing to,

413
00:37:36,484 --> 00:37:38,044
if you're bullish on Bitcoin,

414
00:37:38,224 --> 00:37:39,704
I mean, make no mistake,

415
00:37:39,824 --> 00:37:41,624
we're bullish on Bitcoin in the long term.

416
00:37:42,244 --> 00:37:43,544
But the point that I keep making

417
00:37:43,544 --> 00:37:45,864
is that cycles have no respect for trends.

418
00:37:46,484 --> 00:37:48,564
And you've got to understand

419
00:37:48,564 --> 00:37:49,744
where you are on the cycle

420
00:37:49,744 --> 00:37:51,504
to basically benefit

421
00:37:51,504 --> 00:37:52,724
from these long-term trends.

422
00:37:53,644 --> 00:37:55,524
And even if, you know,

423
00:37:55,524 --> 00:38:00,864
Bitcoin goes up strongly over the next few years, it may still be lower by the year end than it is

424
00:38:00,864 --> 00:38:05,284
now. And that's really the risk that we want to try and understand. What I would be doing first

425
00:38:05,284 --> 00:38:11,164
off is looking at what happens to the gold market and whether this China effect in the near term

426
00:38:11,164 --> 00:38:18,364
is going to persist. Now, we know that the MOU has been likely torn up and it may well be that

427
00:38:18,364 --> 00:38:24,304
China decides that it can't afford to press the gas pedal and get the economy restarted because

428
00:38:24,304 --> 00:38:29,404
there's no oil around. So they're going to have to go double down again and put the brake on. I

429
00:38:29,404 --> 00:38:34,104
don't know. We'll have to see how that pans out. That could be the case. But the other thing that's

430
00:38:34,104 --> 00:38:39,604
bubbling away in the background is what's happening in, I know we're sort of straying into the macro

431
00:38:39,604 --> 00:38:45,924
space. So if you want me to stop, I will. No, no, macro is great. But if you look at the

432
00:38:45,924 --> 00:38:55,564
the problem in the US markets, this is really what's going on in the background.

433
00:38:55,564 --> 00:39:05,104
Now, what you could actually argue is that maybe the two most important prices in the world economy,

434
00:39:05,844 --> 00:39:08,804
this is trying to understand what's actually happening to the real economy,

435
00:39:09,144 --> 00:39:15,764
the oil price and the US Treasury yield, have both been suppressed well below their normal equilibrium.

436
00:39:15,924 --> 00:39:34,084
And if that is the case, that's giving a big boost to world economic growth. And if you have strong economic growth, as I've tried to articulate, that isn't necessarily good for financial markets because all money that's anywhere must be somewhere. So if it's in the real economy, it's not going to be in financial markets.

437
00:39:34,084 --> 00:39:59,744
Now, what this chart here is demonstrating is the correlation between the black line, which is nominal GDP growth. So in other words, the value of US national income in current dollars year on year change. Okay, that's the trend. That's the black line. So that's basically nominal economic growth in the US, real growth plus inflation, in other words.

438
00:39:59,744 --> 00:40:07,904
and the orange line is the US 10-year bond yield and I've called it risk adjusted and that takes

439
00:40:07,904 --> 00:40:13,104
out some of the near-term distortions but it's trying to look at the underlying level of interest

440
00:40:13,104 --> 00:40:20,324
rates in the US system. In other words, it's telling us what the market is expecting for

441
00:40:20,324 --> 00:40:26,404
interest rates, policy interest rates, Fed funds over the next 10 years. Now, what that shows

442
00:40:26,404 --> 00:40:31,824
is a remarkable correlation between those two series. Actually, it's kind of what you'd expect,

443
00:40:32,124 --> 00:40:40,004
really. And you can see where we are now. And it looks as if US Treasury yields are well below

444
00:40:40,004 --> 00:40:45,684
where they should be. And the dotted line, the orange line, dotted orange line,

445
00:40:45,684 --> 00:40:51,804
is saying where we expect they may end up. So what you've got is a lot of upward pressure on

446
00:40:51,804 --> 00:41:00,424
bond yields. Now, think of this a little bit like, well, let's say this is suppressed. And think of

447
00:41:00,424 --> 00:41:05,384
this a little bit like holding a beach ball, an inflated beach ball underwater. And the people

448
00:41:05,384 --> 00:41:10,304
that are holding it down are the US Treasury and the US Federal Reserve, because they want to keep

449
00:41:10,304 --> 00:41:15,664
their interest bill low, and they want bond yields to be suppressed, because that's kind of helpful

450
00:41:15,664 --> 00:41:21,184
to the economy. So they're doing all they can to keep these yields down. And a number of things

451
00:41:21,184 --> 00:41:26,984
they're doing are they're very active in what's called the repo markets. Repo markets are basically

452
00:41:26,984 --> 00:41:33,464
at the centre of funding in not just the US, but in the world economy. And it goes back to a

453
00:41:33,464 --> 00:41:38,344
statement I made right at the beginning about how the world is dependent on collateralised finance.

454
00:41:38,984 --> 00:41:43,604
And what that really means is that prior to the global financial crisis in 2008,

455
00:41:44,124 --> 00:41:50,344
banks would lend freely to each other without any security. They did it on trust, okay? There was a

456
00:41:50,344 --> 00:42:05,934
lot of trust in the system Following the global financial crisis not surprisingly lenders wanted a bit more security So what you had is this sizable jump in the use of collateral and the repo markets effectively intermediate that collateral

457
00:42:06,474 --> 00:42:12,034
So in the repo markets, that's what repo stands for sale and repurchase. What you're actually

458
00:42:12,034 --> 00:42:18,594
doing is you're effectively borrowing against collateral. That collateral tends to be something

459
00:42:18,594 --> 00:42:26,434
which has got well-recognized value, like a US treasury bond, is liquid, is secure, etc.

460
00:42:27,134 --> 00:42:35,774
So you'll post a treasury security to your credit provider, and he will lend against that. Maybe

461
00:42:35,774 --> 00:42:42,174
they'll lend 98% of the value against that collateral, 95% or 90% or whatever it may be,

462
00:42:42,654 --> 00:42:47,514
and then you can get a loan. And that's what the repo markets do. And the treasury

463
00:42:47,514 --> 00:42:53,634
and the Fed have been intervening heavily in those repo markets to basically keep, if you like,

464
00:42:53,674 --> 00:43:00,394
the pot boiling and the treasury market yield suppressed. Now, to use that beach ball analogy,

465
00:43:00,834 --> 00:43:06,934
you're basically holding the beach ball underwater. Now, there's a couple of problems in that.

466
00:43:07,434 --> 00:43:13,354
One is this one, which is what happened to Japan when it tried to hold its beach ball underwater.

467
00:43:13,354 --> 00:43:20,654
and this is looking at the US JGB market, Japanese government bond market. The dotted line

468
00:43:20,654 --> 00:43:27,694
is my estimate of what the fair value is on the Japanese long bond, the 10-year bond.

469
00:43:28,114 --> 00:43:32,194
And you see those figures, I mean, roughly for a long time, about 1%. But actually,

470
00:43:32,554 --> 00:43:38,114
through that period, Japanese yields, the actual yields, the solid line went negative.

471
00:43:38,774 --> 00:43:40,234
Because of their yield curve control program.

472
00:43:40,374 --> 00:43:43,114
Yeah, it was all this yield curve control and whatever else.

473
00:43:43,354 --> 00:43:48,034
Now, as soon as they stopped that yield curve control, the fair value of the market went up,

474
00:43:48,094 --> 00:43:55,094
that dotted line, but also the actual market overshot. And you can see what's happened is that

475
00:43:55,094 --> 00:44:03,534
you've got something like, I mean, at least a 200 basis point jump in yield since the ending of that

476
00:44:03,534 --> 00:44:09,014
yield curve control program. Now, given the fact that the starting point was basically around 50

477
00:44:09,014 --> 00:44:15,994
basis points, we're now up at over 2, 2.5% for JGB yields at 10 years. I mean, this is a phenomenal

478
00:44:15,994 --> 00:44:21,834
change. The world's never seen anything quite like this. And this is what can happen. So if you're

479
00:44:21,834 --> 00:44:27,294
holding that beach ball on the water and suddenly let go, it shoots higher. Now, the problem you've

480
00:44:27,294 --> 00:44:37,594
got in the US is basically this one. And this is showing the pressures at the front end of the US

481
00:44:37,594 --> 00:44:41,754
term structure. This is getting a little bit in the weeds and I'm going to try not to do this too

482
00:44:41,754 --> 00:44:48,654
much. But basically what this is telling us is that if you squeeze hard on one end of a balloon,

483
00:44:48,994 --> 00:44:55,314
it's going to bulge somewhere else. So you can't stop that. So if they're squeezing hard

484
00:44:55,314 --> 00:45:01,474
at the sort of 10-year, longer-dated area of the market, it's going to be bulging elsewhere in the

485
00:45:01,474 --> 00:45:06,674
term structure and it's bulging at the front end. And what this is basically illustrating

486
00:45:06,674 --> 00:45:15,234
is those pressures. Now, the orange line is the two-year treasury yield in the US.

487
00:45:16,194 --> 00:45:22,494
And that's a very, very good marker to what the private sector markets believe

488
00:45:22,494 --> 00:45:30,274
policy rates will have to do in the US. So it's a very good sort of indicator based on supply and

489
00:45:30,274 --> 00:45:37,354
demand as to where interest rates will really be set over the next two years. And can I just ask

490
00:45:37,354 --> 00:45:42,454
you a quick question on this chart? Because a friend of mine, Jeff Ross, uses this chart a lot.

491
00:45:42,574 --> 00:45:47,094
And the thing that he often says is this proves that the market actually decides the rates,

492
00:45:47,194 --> 00:45:49,514
not the Fed. Is that what you see when you look at this?

493
00:45:49,874 --> 00:45:56,354
100%. That's exactly what we've been saying. It's always the case that it's the long end of the

494
00:45:56,354 --> 00:46:02,074
market that determines the short end of the market the federal reserve is is not i mean can influence

495
00:46:02,074 --> 00:46:07,534
things in the very very very short term but there's not much it can do and that's really the

496
00:46:07,534 --> 00:46:11,834
point but that shows what a tricky spot that kevin walsh is in now because he's obviously

497
00:46:11,834 --> 00:46:16,594
been brought in to lower interest rates but the market's saying no like what do you think he will

498
00:46:16,594 --> 00:46:23,894
do well i just don't think he can he can't he can't ease because i mean what you're doing is

499
00:46:23,894 --> 00:46:32,514
you're stoking a fire already because the US economy is already growing very fast.

500
00:46:33,214 --> 00:46:38,414
And if you look at, I mean, these are sort of economic statistics I can throw out,

501
00:46:38,874 --> 00:46:43,954
but if you look at US money supply measures, I mean, we don't look at money supply

502
00:46:43,954 --> 00:46:49,154
to understand financial markets, really. We look at money supply to understand the real economy.

503
00:46:49,154 --> 00:46:56,074
and the latest m2 money supply data or let's actually incorporate not the latest but of about

504
00:46:56,074 --> 00:47:02,614
a few weeks ago maybe four or five weeks ago the rate of growth of the rate of monetary growth

505
00:47:02,614 --> 00:47:09,634
was up at close to 10 okay um a three-month annualized rate i mean it's called a little

506
00:47:09,634 --> 00:47:15,274
bit since but that was clearly a big spike and then if you look at some data that came out of

507
00:47:15,274 --> 00:47:20,854
the Philadelphia Fed last week, and you use that data, which was showing a big jump in activity and

508
00:47:20,854 --> 00:47:28,434
still very high inflation pressures, that's pretty much consistent with nominal GDP of about nine,

509
00:47:28,874 --> 00:47:35,414
possibly 10%. So you're looking at a lot of demand growth in the US economy. So I think it would be

510
00:47:35,414 --> 00:47:41,674
absolutely madness if they tried to do anything like, or even get near trying to ease policy.

511
00:47:41,674 --> 00:47:54,754
I mean, it would just be crazy. I don't believe that that's what they're going to do. I think the strength or the firmness in the US dollar is actually already telling us that that's the direction they're going in. They're going towards more tightness.

512
00:47:54,754 --> 00:48:16,834
This chart is telling us that. And if you look at the net difference, which is shown here, as the spread between SOFA rates and the US two-year Treasury, that negative spread is telling you, rather like it did in 2021-22, that we've got a tightening regime upcoming.

513
00:48:16,834 --> 00:48:25,834
Now, that tightening regime in 21-22 caused the S&P to fall 25%, and it caused Bitcoin to fall 75%.

514
00:48:26,394 --> 00:48:31,414
Now, I'm not going to say you're not necessarily going to get a repeat of history, but just be careful.

515
00:48:32,994 --> 00:48:34,134
It's really interesting.

516
00:48:34,434 --> 00:48:38,194
Do you think part of this is why Kevin Walsh has come out?

517
00:48:38,254 --> 00:48:43,034
He said he wants to create an inflation task force to kind of get back to first principles of what inflation is.

518
00:48:43,034 --> 00:48:47,874
and he said that he cares about the left side of the decimal place, not the right.

519
00:48:48,234 --> 00:48:50,974
So essentially saying he'll go up to 3% inflation.

520
00:48:51,434 --> 00:48:55,794
Is this him trying to figure ways of manipulating the narrative

521
00:48:55,794 --> 00:48:57,794
and doing what he actually wants to do?

522
00:48:59,314 --> 00:49:03,354
Well, I think he's giving himself some degrees of freedom, that's for sure.

523
00:49:03,874 --> 00:49:07,454
I mean, I don't know the exact figure, but it's something like,

524
00:49:07,454 --> 00:49:16,594
is it 63 or 64 months now since the Fed last hit its 2% inflation target? I mean, it's so long ago

525
00:49:16,594 --> 00:49:22,214
that it's almost ridiculous that they're still trying to target 2%. I mean, the underlying

526
00:49:22,214 --> 00:49:29,454
inflation rate in the economy is much higher than that. And they simply can't recognize that

527
00:49:29,454 --> 00:49:33,914
because it will then become embedded in expectations. So they've got to keep the sort

528
00:49:33,914 --> 00:49:38,674
falsehood, they're still trying to target 2% inflation. But I think what he's doing is being

529
00:49:38,674 --> 00:49:56,684
realistic and saying well okay let give ourselves a little bit of flexibility because that will mean I may not have to tighten as aggressively as maybe I should do But you know then again you know the cynic in me says that you know all these little tools that or tricks that policymakers are using

530
00:49:56,684 --> 00:50:02,724
are really just telling us that they really want to raise rates quickly. They want to keep this

531
00:50:02,724 --> 00:50:07,304
thing going as long as possible. But the problem is, you know, using the beach ball analogy,

532
00:50:07,304 --> 00:50:12,704
maybe events overtake them and they have to start to tighten aggressively at some stage.

533
00:50:12,804 --> 00:50:19,404
I mean, you know, not being early in the tightening causes you to do a lot more overkill later on.

534
00:50:20,164 --> 00:50:25,164
And so when, like, to use your analogy, when they let go of the beach ball, what happens?

535
00:50:25,364 --> 00:50:27,664
Is that sort of financial crisis in the US?

536
00:50:27,884 --> 00:50:29,444
Like, how does that play out?

537
00:50:30,904 --> 00:50:31,584
Well, it could be.

538
00:50:31,784 --> 00:50:34,404
I mean, that's, I mean, never say never.

539
00:50:34,404 --> 00:50:52,724
So this is my measure of where you get disequilibria or financial crises, to use a less poetic term, financial crises in the system.

540
00:50:53,484 --> 00:50:58,224
And this is looking at what I define as the debt liquidity ratio.

541
00:50:58,224 --> 00:51:09,224
Now, if you come back to the sort of opening statement I made, which is to say, you know, financial crises or financial markets more generally are about refinancing.

542
00:51:10,124 --> 00:51:11,764
I mean, it's all about refinancing debt.

543
00:51:11,844 --> 00:51:14,064
And that's the main role of a financial market.

544
00:51:14,544 --> 00:51:20,664
So if you see a financial crisis, it's because you can't refinance, you can't roll over the debt.

545
00:51:21,244 --> 00:51:26,904
And effectively, there is default threatened because that debt cannot be paid back.

546
00:51:27,484 --> 00:51:33,384
Now, what happens in those situations is you get a cascade into a crisis.

547
00:51:34,224 --> 00:51:39,464
And that tends to occur when the debt liquidity ratio is so stretched that there's insufficient

548
00:51:39,464 --> 00:51:45,224
liquidity, in other words, balance sheet capacity among financial lenders to roll over the debt,

549
00:51:45,224 --> 00:51:47,404
to provide the balance sheet space to do that.

550
00:51:47,964 --> 00:51:55,404
And that tends to occur at levels, as you can see here, at around about 220, 230 on that chart.

551
00:51:55,404 --> 00:52:20,824
Now, 200, which is the long-term average, I don't know why, but that's where it is, seems to be a level of some stability. And anything above that, you get a financial crisis, which I've annotated. So all these past financial crises have tended to occur when you get very high debt liquidity ratios. And that comes back to this whole point about refinancing debt.

552
00:52:20,824 --> 00:52:35,764
And if you look at the lower part of the diagram, when there's lots of liquidity relative to debt, what you find there is you get asset bubbles because the vent in the financial sector of too much liquidity is ultimately an asset bubble.

553
00:52:36,344 --> 00:52:45,784
Now, what we've just come through is what I've loosely called here the everything bubble, where you see huge liquidity relative to debt.

554
00:52:46,224 --> 00:52:47,804
That's not because debt is small.

555
00:52:48,304 --> 00:52:49,964
It's largely for two reasons.

556
00:52:49,964 --> 00:52:59,944
One is that liquidity has grown enormous because the response of policymakers to every crisis, be it COVID or the GFC, is just to throw liquidity at the system.

557
00:53:00,564 --> 00:53:02,044
You know, spoiler alert there.

558
00:53:03,124 --> 00:53:12,664
Everyone should be owning these monetary inflation hedges long term, like crypto or gold, parche the cycle.

559
00:53:13,164 --> 00:53:15,544
But this is their response.

560
00:53:15,544 --> 00:53:23,824
And if you want an insurance policy against it, you've just got to own these monetary inflation hedges because they will go up dramatically in that environment.

561
00:53:24,564 --> 00:53:25,504
So that's one thing.

562
00:53:25,564 --> 00:53:35,944
And the other thing is that because policymakers recklessly decided they were going to slash interest rates to zero or even negative in cases, it caused people to term out their debt.

563
00:53:35,944 --> 00:53:57,344
So in other words, if you had borrowings, if you were sitting in the COVID crisis in 2020 and saw interest rates of zero and negative, you thought, well, great, I've got debt which is maturing in three years. Why don't I just refinance it now for another seven years at zero or 1% and I'm quids in? And that's what happened.

564
00:53:57,824 --> 00:54:02,324
So if you look at this chart, this is showing what I call the debt maturity wall, which is

565
00:54:02,324 --> 00:54:07,184
basically saying, and this is not the absolute level, this is the change in the amount of debt

566
00:54:07,184 --> 00:54:14,004
that needs to be rolled each year. So in 2021-22, there was a big drop because investors turned out

567
00:54:14,004 --> 00:54:20,184
their debt and a bit in 23-24. And now you start to see from 25 onwards that the amount of debt

568
00:54:20,184 --> 00:54:26,244
that needs refinancing is growing all the time. And this is existing debt, it's not new debt. So

569
00:54:26,244 --> 00:54:30,564
you've got to add on to that, you know, the amount of funding that the US government will require

570
00:54:30,564 --> 00:54:36,044
because of defence spending, you know, what European governments will require, what the AI

571
00:54:36,044 --> 00:54:44,124
capex boomer require, all these things are adding to this, which is purely, you know, the debt in,

572
00:54:45,004 --> 00:54:50,544
that's expiring the existing debt, if you like. So that's really the issue that we're facing

573
00:54:50,544 --> 00:54:57,784
upcoming. And it comes back to this general statement, which is talking about the debt

574
00:54:57,784 --> 00:55:04,124
liquidity cycle. And this is the centerpiece of our analysis, which says, look, financial markets

575
00:55:04,124 --> 00:55:09,024
are debt refinancing mechanisms. It's all about this interaction of debt and liquidity.

576
00:55:09,804 --> 00:55:17,044
Liquidity needs debt because most lending is collateralized. Debt needs liquidity because

577
00:55:17,044 --> 00:55:22,504
debt has to be rolled over. So you get this sort of nervous equilibrium between debt and liquidity.

578
00:55:23,284 --> 00:55:27,644
And if that derails, on the left-hand side, you can't turn your debt into liquidity.

579
00:55:28,164 --> 00:55:33,684
You get problems in the repo collateral markets, which is why things like the SOFA spread or the

580
00:55:33,684 --> 00:55:38,324
move index, I mean, I'm getting into the weeds of this for most people, but that's when they tend to

581
00:55:38,324 --> 00:55:45,404
signal flash warning signs. And then on the right-hand side, because something like 70% of

582
00:55:45,404 --> 00:55:51,064
80% of all transactions in financial markets are rolling over existing debts, you're going to get

583
00:55:51,064 --> 00:55:58,584
problems either in bond term premia, which collapse, or you get credit spreads which blow out.

584
00:55:59,164 --> 00:56:05,544
And there's a big move towards safety in that space. People are nervous because debts can't

585
00:56:05,544 --> 00:56:11,724
be refinanced. So that's how the system works. And that debt liquidity nexus at the heart of it

586
00:56:11,724 --> 00:56:19,744
is basically shown here in this debt liquidity ratio. And you'll see the gray area that we project,

587
00:56:20,224 --> 00:56:26,104
that orange line goes up. Why does it go up? It goes up because A, the cycle in liquidity is

588
00:56:26,104 --> 00:56:31,424
turning down for the reasons that we've gone into, and B, because you've got this debt maturity wall

589
00:56:31,424 --> 00:56:38,344
upcoming, which is causing debt to come back that needs to be refinanced. So that's the problems

590
00:56:38,344 --> 00:56:47,484
we've got. And that's why I would be hesitant about diving in now. Don't try and catch a

591
00:56:47,484 --> 00:56:53,324
falling knife. Just wait for things to stabilize and try and get a reasoned view because Bitcoin

592
00:56:53,324 --> 00:56:59,384
and gold will pick up dramatically in the medium term. But I wouldn't necessarily be

593
00:56:59,384 --> 00:57:05,784
an aggressive buyer right here. It's interesting. Anyone who knows about Bitcoin knows that this

594
00:57:05,784 --> 00:57:12,404
isn't something you buy for six to 12 months. This is a long-term buy. But when this liquidity

595
00:57:12,404 --> 00:57:17,984
cycle does reach its bottom, is there always a catalyst that turns the liquidity switch back on?

596
00:57:19,464 --> 00:57:22,664
Well, I mean, the biggest is a financial crisis, yeah.

597
00:57:23,724 --> 00:57:38,114
But I mean we not getting a financial crisis or are we going to get a financial crisis every six years or however long this liquidity cycle actually lasts Well I mean that really been the pattern But I think we can debate are they big or are they small liquidity crises

598
00:57:39,254 --> 00:57:41,994
I mean, if the central banks are alert, they're relatively small ones.

599
00:57:43,274 --> 00:57:47,114
We saw there was a repo crisis in 2019.

600
00:57:48,034 --> 00:57:54,974
There was the COVID crisis, 2020, 2021, etc.

601
00:57:54,974 --> 00:57:59,774
uh there's been a bigger you know i'm actually maybe that's that's a that's a bad the covid one's

602
00:57:59,774 --> 00:58:06,234
a bad example maybe the big the the bigger crisis was the one the post-covid tightening uh which was

603
00:58:06,234 --> 00:58:13,414
20 21 22 probably so you can see you you've got this sort of pattern unfolding um and it's not

604
00:58:13,414 --> 00:58:18,714
exactly every five to six years because things you know nothing is perfect but you get that sort of

605
00:58:18,714 --> 00:58:22,994
that frequency and that uh and that's what we've got to we've got to look at i mean that you know

606
00:58:22,994 --> 00:58:24,334
I mean, we made a statement.

607
00:58:24,454 --> 00:58:29,414
I mean, this is going back a long time, back at the time of the GFC, is to say that what

608
00:58:29,414 --> 00:58:34,574
you've got is a future which is going to be dominated by QE processes.

609
00:58:35,074 --> 00:58:37,714
And don't think of QE1 or QE.

610
00:58:37,774 --> 00:58:40,614
Think of QE1, QE2, QE3, QE4.

611
00:58:41,054 --> 00:58:46,234
You're going to get a series of these quantitative easing processes because that's what central

612
00:58:46,234 --> 00:58:47,874
banks are in the game to do now.

613
00:58:47,874 --> 00:59:09,414
The debt has become such a problem that they need to refinance debt and they need to reliquify periodically the financial system because it can't cope. And that's the issue. And all this talk about, you know, brave talk about the Federal Reserve balance sheet is going to be shrunk dramatically. I mean, dream on. There's no way they can do that.

614
00:59:09,414 --> 00:59:23,194
Well, that's always the question I have. The debt problem is obviously ever growing. How do they ever get out of this? Do you think their plan is to inflate their way out of it? I can't see them ever defaulting. So what other options do they have?

615
00:59:23,194 --> 00:59:51,614
Well, they have no options. They can only inflate. Because in a modern credit system, as I said, the paradox that you've got, if you look at this chart, I mean, basically, liquidity depends on debt. Okay, so liquidity, call that new credit, depends on debt. But that's old debt, right? So the debt that they're using as collateral is existing treasury debt for the most part, okay?

616
00:59:51,614 --> 01:00:06,274
So you can't let defaults happen because you're basically undermining your whole credit system. So if that's ruled out, all you can do is basically print money to devalue. That's what the Chinese are doing.

617
01:00:06,274 --> 01:00:23,834
But the issue I think we've got to get our heads out of or people have got to accept is that the sort of debasement of debt, the great debasement as people talk, hasn't happened yet.

618
01:00:24,214 --> 01:00:25,654
We haven't had that period.

619
01:00:26,114 --> 01:00:28,074
We're getting it in China, right?

620
01:00:28,374 --> 01:00:32,174
And the Chinese have sort of managed to do it through capital controls and whatever else.

621
01:00:32,554 --> 01:00:34,814
I mean, that may be a pointer to the future.

622
01:00:34,814 --> 01:01:00,234
I mean, it may be very difficult for Western governments to impose capital controls, but it doesn't mean to say they won't try. And you can see that in many cases. I mean, already they're starting to try and stop, trying to direct capital into local schemes, whether it's Trump's attempts, make America great again, whether it's the attempts that the British socialists are doing.

623
01:01:00,234 --> 01:01:11,974
I mean, all these things are ways to try and corral money and stop it flowing to where it should flow, which is monetary inflation hedges when they're basically printing money.

624
01:01:12,674 --> 01:01:24,354
But, you know, as I say, the thing to think about is that China is really the country that's tried to get to grips with its historic debt problem.

625
01:01:24,354 --> 01:01:31,954
okay the debt problem the west faces is a future debt problem much more than a current one do you

626
01:01:31,954 --> 01:01:36,294
think they've got any chance of growing themselves out of this debt and obviously ai being the the

627
01:01:36,294 --> 01:01:42,534
sort of only obvious catalyst no i don't think they've got any chance at all um because you know

628
01:01:42,534 --> 01:01:49,714
you're in a situation where you know growth for the most part i mean i'm not going to discount ai

629
01:01:49,714 --> 01:01:53,954
and say that innovation technology is not any good.

630
01:01:54,114 --> 01:02:00,394
But the fact is that a lot of growth is very demographically sensitive.

631
01:02:01,294 --> 01:02:05,514
And the growth rate of economies is really, at the end of the day,

632
01:02:05,614 --> 01:02:08,074
dependent upon young workforces.

633
01:02:09,154 --> 01:02:10,734
And we don't have that.

634
01:02:12,214 --> 01:02:13,534
Yeah, demographic problem.

635
01:02:13,814 --> 01:02:14,934
It's super interesting.

636
01:02:15,054 --> 01:02:16,234
I've really enjoyed this, Michael.

637
01:02:16,234 --> 01:02:21,414
If for anyone listening to this who wants like an actionable thing to do, what is the move here?

638
01:02:21,514 --> 01:02:24,594
Like, obviously, the debasement trade isn't a trade that lasts a year.

639
01:02:24,674 --> 01:02:25,694
This is a long term trade.

640
01:02:25,794 --> 01:02:27,434
Is it still buy gold, buy Bitcoin?

641
01:02:29,114 --> 01:02:30,034
Yeah, I think it is.

642
01:02:31,254 --> 01:02:33,034
I think it is to do those things.

643
01:02:34,094 --> 01:02:35,234
That would be sensible.

644
01:02:35,914 --> 01:02:42,714
I think you've got to, you know, also think about the jurisdiction, the geographical jurisdiction of your investments.

645
01:02:42,714 --> 01:02:48,474
and you know i'm not giving recommendations because i don't know the answer but you know

646
01:02:48,474 --> 01:02:53,974
i think that if you start to get uh if you start to get cases where it's going to be very difficult

647
01:02:53,974 --> 01:03:00,274
for certain governments to fund themselves uh um you know let's go close to home with britain

648
01:03:00,274 --> 01:03:05,194
i mean if you've got a socialist agenda which allegedly you have being written down in the uk

649
01:03:05,194 --> 01:03:10,534
now i mean bond vigilantes worldwide are not going to be wanting to fund fund this at existing

650
01:03:10,534 --> 01:03:16,354
interest rates. So how are they going to try and get this stuff funded? Well, there's going to

651
01:03:16,354 --> 01:03:22,174
have to be directives to pension funds or wherever it may be to try and force them to put money into

652
01:03:22,174 --> 01:03:27,754
the UK. And that clearly is something which is going to constrain investors' ability to invest.

653
01:03:28,414 --> 01:03:34,674
So I would diversify. That's the best thing. I think gold and Bitcoin are clearly international

654
01:03:34,674 --> 01:03:42,234
assets that can be held. But I think one's got to be realistic and face up to the fact that the

655
01:03:42,234 --> 01:03:48,074
world has changed. And that change in the world is partly a function of China and partly a function

656
01:03:48,074 --> 01:03:55,674
of demographics. And the fact is that the West is bust. And the reason that the UK goes through

657
01:03:55,674 --> 01:04:00,814
prime ministers every two years is simply the fact there's no money left. They can't fulfill

658
01:04:00,814 --> 01:04:05,854
an agenda and they lose the confidence of their party. But that's the reality. And that's probably

659
01:04:05,854 --> 01:04:11,094
a fact across Europe as well. I think you can probably short any country that's bringing Gary's

660
01:04:11,094 --> 01:04:18,454
economics on as an advisor. That's probably a safe bet. Michael, this has been fascinating.

661
01:04:18,734 --> 01:04:22,734
Thank you so much for coming on the show. Where can people go and find more of your work? I know

662
01:04:22,734 --> 01:04:27,514
you have a sub stack. Where do you want people to go and follow you? Best way is the sub stack,

663
01:04:27,514 --> 01:04:29,214
I think that's called Capital Wars.

664
01:04:29,794 --> 01:04:31,314
And we write a lot of stuff.

665
01:04:31,614 --> 01:04:33,234
You know, we do narrative provide data.

666
01:04:33,594 --> 01:04:35,754
We do two or three pieces a week.

667
01:04:35,994 --> 01:04:39,814
We talk about crypto, gold, asset allocation,

668
01:04:40,734 --> 01:04:42,934
Fed policy, China, all these things,

669
01:04:43,374 --> 01:04:44,434
which we think are relevant.

670
01:04:45,334 --> 01:04:47,554
I'll make sure I put all the links in the show notes,

671
01:04:47,674 --> 01:04:48,794
but thank you so much for this.

672
01:04:48,834 --> 01:04:49,774
We'll have to do it again when,

673
01:04:50,034 --> 01:04:51,874
maybe when the liquidity cycle is turning again.

674
01:04:52,554 --> 01:04:54,714
We can be more bullish on Bitcoin then.

675
01:04:56,254 --> 01:04:56,654
Great.

676
01:04:56,874 --> 01:04:57,114
Perfect.

677
01:04:57,514 --> 01:04:58,134
Thank you.

678
01:04:58,294 --> 01:04:59,154
Thank you so much.