The fiat system steals time, which it's a terrible thing to have to just suddenly break the promise that they made to these people.
It just goes parabolic in terms of the interest expense.
And then you're in this situation where, I mean, massive currency debasement will probably happen at that point.
97% of institutional capital, almost $100 trillion, have investment mandates for equity and bonds, right?
And that's trapped capital. We love Bitcoin and we want to drive its adoption because we think it's the most important technology of the 21st century. These positive developments keep coming every single week. And so you have this divergence of like improving fundamentals and depressed price. And typically that's a good opportunity, right? It's like zoom out the cliche and think long term because Bitcoin's value proposition has never been stronger.
I think those price predictions that you hear that we're all wrong are eventually going to be right.
But it's just the time rising and that's the hardest part to predict.
Sam Callahan.
Hey.
How you doing, man?
Great.
It's been a little while since you've been on the show.
Yeah, thanks for having me.
Things have changed for you?
Yes.
Go on, tell everyone about your treasury company.
So I'm the director of strategy and research at Orange BTC.
We're the largest Bitcoin treasury company in Latin America.
So we have 3,720 Bitcoin.
We went public about eight weeks ago on the B3 stock exchange in Sao Paulo.
Our mission is to accelerate Bitcoin adoption in Latin America and Brazil
in a place and region that needs Bitcoin the most, right?
They have so much currency debasement and instability there.
They also have like high rates of digital asset adoption broadly,
but still, there's a lot of work that needs to be done
in terms of education,
in terms of building out infrastructure,
you know, Bitcoin financial services,
Bitcoin products.
We think Orange could be a leader in this
and be like the Bitcoin hub,
both improving Bitcoin access
for pools of capital that can't buy spot Bitcoin,
as well as, like I said,
building out Bitcoin financial services
and products over time
and being kind of that...
educational powerhouse for Bitcoin.
Because, you know, it's kind of amazing.
It's like two to three years behind
in terms of like the Bitcoin understanding there.
And even just writing like a Bitcoin 101 report
that we just put out in Portuguese,
you know, maybe some of the content
is familiar to US audiences,
but we released it and it was wildly popular
because like, wow, I never thought about, say,
like Cresis's total addressable market chart
that everyone knows.
Like we put that in Portuguese
and they're like, oh, I never thought of it like that.
So it just shows like how they're a little bit behind,
but that presents a lot of opportunity
for a company like Orange.
Oh, there's massive opportunity there.
Like especially the amount of stable coin usage there,
like educating people about Bitcoin,
why that's important.
I think it's very cool.
Congratulations.
Thanks.
I'm going to give you some shit about treasury companies.
I'm going to ask you some of the hard questions
because I'm still on the fence a little bit,
but can we start with some macro stuff?
Because you do a lot of macro analysis.
You do reports with Lynn.
What are the things that you're keeping an eye on most closely at the moment?
Well, Lynn and I wrote that piece on Bitcoin's correlation with global liquidity.
And so I always keep an eye on global liquidity conditions.
And I think there was that chart going around that looks at Global M2 and Bitcoin.
And there was a lot of disappointment because Global M2 was going up and Bitcoin's price has decoupled from it.
And there was like, this is broken. This relationship's broken.
It wasn't correct.
But in the report, if you read it, there's an entire section that we wrote about how Bitcoin decouples from global liquidity conditions at times.
And I think we're in one of those moments right now.
So why do you think it would be decoupling now?
Well, in the report, we talk about how a couple of things.
When there's internal market dynamics, like within Bitcoin itself, it can override what's going on with liquidity.
And that like, so for instance, like the FTX collapse, that was unique to Bitcoin, didn't matter what was going on with the Fed or the money printing. There was a lot of chaos going on in the Bitcoin market itself, and it got wrapped up in all that chaos. And so the Bitcoin price suffered despite liquidity conditions being either unchanged or actually improving. So that was one example, or like a good example would be the launch of the ETFs. You know, that added a lot of demand, even though interest rates were going up.
So that decoupled to the upside.
Yeah, exactly. So that's unique factors that can... idiosyncratic events that can lead to the
decoupling. But then there's also supply-side dynamics. So think about liquidity as a demand-side
dynamic. Well, supply-side dynamics can also override the liquidity conditions. And when I
say supply-side, typically that means when you talk about the long-term holders. We probably
talked about that in your show with other guests of how they've been taking some profits, which is
normal behavior in a bull market. But when you see a lot of that, sometimes those dynamics can
override the liquidity conditions too. And so I think lately that's exactly what we've been seeing.
And so I don't think the relationship is broken. I think we're just in this temporary period
where these other dynamics are at play, but they're temporary. And eventually,
liquidity takes the wheel again. And right now what we're seeing is liquidity conditions in terms
of 85% of global central banks
are cutting rates already.
Fed's obviously cutting rates.
You're seeing some of these moves by the Treasury
indicating that there's some tightness
in liquidity conditions,
which means they're returning to, say,
like they're stocking QT.
The Treasury's talking about issuing on the short end
or the Fed's starting to buy T-bills.
They also tweak the bank capital reserve requirements,
which is to create more demand for treasuries
because they know they got to do these trillion dollar deficits still, right?
So like liquidity conditions will take the wheel again
and they're actually going to be easing, it seems like,
over the next year or two years, which is good for Bitcoin.
So you think this is a temporary thing for Bitcoin?
You don't think it's like four-year cycle type thing playing out?
No, no.
Because I mean, look, I look at the fundamentals.
Like I always looked at the fundamentals.
You look at the price, you're going to get wrapped up in the volatility.
But when you look at what's going on over the last year, like I just wrote this other report and it was about major milestones in Bitcoin adoption.
And I had to do two separate timelines because so much has happened in 2025 alone in terms of all the regulatory changes, all these institutional adoption, all these major news stories.
It seems like every week we get something that it's like, wow, this is wild.
So like last week, it was like Bank of America, right?
Or like Vanguard pivoting.
You know, these are like, they just keep,
these positive developments keep coming every single week.
And so you have this divergence of like improving fundamentals
and depressed price.
And typically, that's a good opportunity, right?
So I think, I've never been more bullish on Bitcoin.
I think it's an amazing entry point.
Not financial advice or anything,
but it's just, I've been in this for eight years now, and I've never seen such positive fundamentals
for Bitcoin. So I don't follow macro anywhere near as closely as you do. But the thing that I
always think, and this might be super simplistic, is the midterms of next year, the economy is
incredibly important to the midterms, therefore economy is going to be good. And generally,
if you have additional liquidity into the markets, Bitcoin is probably going to perform better than
most things. But it's interesting that over the last few years, maybe the last two years,
Bitcoin's not really had like an influx of new people coming to it. It doesn't seem like at
least. And certainly not like in 2017 or 2021. And my kind of take on that is they're probably
going to like AI stocks, which are running like crazy. I mean, weirdly gold has had more retail
interest than Bitcoin, I think this cycle. Do you think that's coming back? Or do you think we're
missing a narrative in bitcoin at the moment well you said i don't think more people are getting into
bitcoin more retail maybe like it's not like this like speculative fervor that you've seen before
like i mean you could have google searches but i think anecdotally you just feel it there's not like
i mean you you worked at this podcast for a long time and so it's different right yeah um and you're
right i think i think the casino over in the ai world and the returns over there and it's making
Bitcoin not look as attractive or as exciting for people. And so that's probably part of the story.
But that doesn't mean not a lot of people are going. It's just, it's more institutional,
which is more money. Honestly, there's going to be more demand flowing from those institutions
than the retail investors. And so it's just kind of different. It's like a different cohort coming
in. But I think eventually the retail will get back in. And then maybe it's a different entry
points. So obviously the ETFs kind of changed the game. And so BlackRock's ETF, most profitable now
and almost $100 billion in AUM, probably a little bit lower now, but they might be going there,
right? Instead of going into spot Bitcoin, they might be going through their financial advisors
who are getting into Ibit for them. So I think it's just like a different market than it was
in 2021 or 2027.
But I think, you know,
when Bitcoin starts running,
number go up.
I think they're going to come back.
I totally agree.
Because I think one of the weirdest dynamics is
over the last year,
I think Bitcoin has not been volatile
enough for people.
Yeah.
And I think that's why you've seen
loads of people go to treasury companies
and like AI stocks.
As soon as Bitcoin starts running,
that might completely change.
Yeah.
And the volatility,
if you look at like 90 day rolling volatilities,
it was like historic lows for Bitcoin.
You know, it's partly,
probably because of, like I said,
the changing investor base
of more institutional investors coming in.
And they kind of behave differently than retail
is one thing,
but also they use like hedging strategies.
So they can like sell covered calls,
which kind of dampens the volatility
with those different hedging strategies.
And so those option markets
are more liquid than they were before.
There's just more options for them to do those.
And so I think those dynamics are at play here,
but I don't think Bitcoin's volatility is like gone.
I think when you have a fixed supply asset like this,
it's never existed before ever.
And so I think the next wave of demand,
I do think you're just going to see volatility
start to creep back up a little bit.
I mean, maybe there's this secular trend of going down,
which is going to continue,
but I do think we're going to kind of see some more volatility.
That's what we've seen, right?
Over the last month, volatility came back.
Maybe that's the direction that everybody wanted.
Yeah, definitely came back.
So I think that's going to happen again.
Yeah, I hope so.
And this year, I feel like no one predicted what the price was going to do this year.
I don't know anyone that said.
So from the day I started the podcast, it was a year, three days ago.
The price was lower after a year.
And I don't think there was any Bitcoiner that would have called that.
No, no.
I mean, myself included.
I mean, because of these fundamentals, I thought it was going to be higher than it is right now.
But at the same time, it's almost impossible to predict Bitcoin's price.
I think that's the lesson here.
It's like nobody actually knows in the short term where Bitcoin's going.
But it's like zoom out the cliche and think long term because Bitcoin's value proposition has never been stronger given the macro environment that we're in.
So over longer periods of time, I think those price predictions that you hear that we're all wrong are eventually going to be right.
But it's just the time horizon and that's the hardest part to predict.
What if you could lower your tax bill and stack Bitcoin at the same time?
Well, by mining Bitcoin with Blockware, you can.
New tax guidelines from the Big Beautiful Bill allow American miners to write off 100% of the cost of their mining hardware in a single tax year.
That's right, 100% write-off.
So if you have $100,000 in capital gains or income, you can purchase $100,000 of miners and offset it entirely.
Blockware's mining as a service enables you to start mining Bitcoin right now without lifting a finger.
Blockware handles everything from securing the miners to sourcing low-cost power to configuring the pool.
They do it all.
You get to stack Bitcoin at a discount every single day while also saving big come tax season.
Get started today by going to mining.blockwaresolutions.com forward slash WBD.
Of course, none of this is tax advice.
Speak to your accountant or tax advisor to understand how these rules apply to you
and then head over to mining.blockwaresolutions.com forward slash WBD
and you'll get one week of free hosting and electricity with each hosted miner purchased.
Do you wish you could access cash without selling your Bitcoin?
Well, Ledin makes that possible.
They're the global leader in Bitcoin-backed lending
and since 2018, they've issued over $9 billion in loans
with a perfect record of protecting client assets.
With Ledin, you get full custody loans with no credit checks or monthly repayments,
just easy access to dollars without selling a single sat.
As of July 1st, Ledin is Bitcoin only, meaning they exclusively offer Bitcoin-backed loans with all collateral held by Ledin directly or their funding partners.
Your Bitcoin is never lent out to generate interest.
I recently took out a loan with Ledin. The whole process was super easy.
The application took me less than 15 minutes and in a few hours I had the dollars in my account. It was really smooth.
So if you need cash but you don't want to sell Bitcoin, head over to leaden.io forward slash WBD and you'll get 0.25% off your first loan.
That's leaden.io forward slash WBD.
With fiat money constantly debasing, wealth preservation isn't optional.
That's why I recommend Swan Bitcoin, a team of dedicated Bitcoiners who work with families and businesses to build and secure generational wealth with Bitcoin.
Strong relationships with clients are at the center of everything Swan does.
A dedicated Swan private wealth representative, which is a real person that you can text and call,
will help you build a Bitcoin wealth strategy using Swan's comprehensive platform of Bitcoin services,
including tax-advantaged retirement accounts, advanced Bitcoin cold storage using collaborative self-custody,
inheritance planning with both trust and entity accounts, tax loss harvesting, asset-backed loans, and more.
Swan have helped over 100,000 clients since 2020, and if you're serious about acquiring and securing Bitcoin, I recommend Swan.
meet the team at swan.com forward slash wbd which is swan.com forward slash wbd i mean so
feeling pretty optimistic about like macro world for the next year or two but we've been talking
over the last few days and you said something that kind of surprised me you were saying that
you think social security and is it medicare as well yeah i'm kind of cooked well they are i mean
it's just math it's just the arithmetic so this is something i've never really paid much attention
to. So tell me about this. Well, look, so Lynn and I wrote that piece on fiscal dominance. She's
been talking about nothing stops this train. And we wrote another piece on that topic.
And at the end of the piece, I talked about how Doge was going to fail. And this was before
everyone was really hyped up on it. And I tweeted, I said, two things can be true at once. Doge
won't put a dent in the fiscal deficit, but it will maybe raise some awareness about fraud. And
And so I think that aged pretty well.
And it really, why we knew that was we just ran the numbers.
Like we looked at what we actually spend the money on
in terms of the fiscal deficits.
And 70% of the spending occurs on mandatory entitlement programs.
So by law, these are promises that they have to pay.
So it's Social Security, Medicare.
And then the last one was interest expense, right?
Which is huge.
And so that increased a lot when the Fed jacked rates.
that's a little different.
But so these,
and basically,
if we want to try to bring down
the fiscal deficits,
like DOGE's goal,
you have to touch
the entitlement programs.
And the problem is
DOGE didn't have
any authority to touch it,
that to change any
of the eligibility requirements
or the benefits
takes an act at Congress.
And so we knew that
most of the fiscal deficits
was mandatory
and that really,
when you break it down,
if Doge couldn't touch any of that,
then they weren't going to do anything.
And so that's exactly what happened.
So when Elon was saying,
hey, we're going to cut a trillion dollars here and there,
it's like, you run the numbers,
you're like, how are you?
You can't do that.
Like, you can't do that.
And so it's concerning because, you know,
when Lynn and I, at the end of that report,
we had a very balanced take.
We were like, this isn't going to be dramatic this decade.
You know, everything's going to run hot.
So inflation's going to run hot.
GDP's going to run hot.
deficits will continue to be very large because they're structural. When you say structural,
I'm talking about those entitlement programs, basically. And so it's going to continue. But we
said the end of the decade. And when I was writing that, what I had in mind was that there's
projections from the CBO that Social Security and Medicare are going to go insolvent by 2032,
which means for the first time, they're going to bring in not enough money to service all of the
beneficiaries And so that a huge problem that coming down the horizon And so yes it not going to be dramatic at the end of this decade but when that happens things can get really dicey in terms of how we manage that
problem. And it's coming. It's seven years away. And nobody's really come up with real solutions
to how to address this. And you think about, I think about the foreturning a lot, because they
say that the climax is going to happen in 2030 to 2032. And so I don't think it's a coincidence
that were going to come into this period around that time
right when these social security and Medicare go insolvent.
And so we can get into like what that means and stuff.
Yeah, I mean, and that's the longest timeframe.
Like there's a reality where that happens earlier than 2032.
But what does that exactly mean?
Like is this, actually maybe a better question is,
is this happening because of aging demographics?
Yes, yeah.
So it's a mix of, it's basically we have the workers
that are funding these entitlement programs.
And so we have a shrinking workforce,
and that's because of falling fertility rates
and all these different dynamics,
as well as an aging population.
And so next year, we're going to reach
what they call peak 65,
which is when you become eligible for Social Security
and Medicare in the United States.
And we have over 4.1 million Americans
that are going to become eligible next year.
It's going to be the largest retirement wave
in U.S. history. And so the costs are going to really increase over the next four years as all
these baby boomers finally become eligible for these programs. And at the same time, these
projections, they don't take into account like any kind of war, any kind of financial crisis
that would blow out the deficits even more. And then at the same time, the projections,
they don't take into account like rising healthcare costs due to inflation. And so a lot of the
projections have actually been lower than what's actually occurred because some of these changing
rules around the healthcare system has actually increased the Medicare cost much, much more than
they projected. And so each year, they project the insolvency actually like a year earlier,
a year earlier. So like, if we think that they're going to keep spending it actually more than they
project, then this could be like 2030, which is like five years away. And what I think about is
like for me, I think about the pandemics like five years away and how like it just feels,
it kind of feels like it was yesterday. And so five years from now, it's going to come up fast.
It's going to come quick.
And the worry is that there's only two ways to really solve this. So when we get to that point,
it's not like suddenly it's like bankrupt and there's no money. It's more like
the benefits are going to get cut by 25% overnight. And so you got older retirees who are
dependent on Social Security. And so I just saw a fact that over 75% of retirees depend on their
benefits for 50% of their income. And each one of them are cutting essentials because they feel like
the cost of living doesn't keep up with their benefits. And so I have a lot of sympathy for
these retirees because they're on fixed incomes. A lot of them, they depend on these and they're
is suddenly going to get cut by 25%.
And then on the flip side,
you have the young people
who have an affordability crisis,
you know, asset prices have inflated,
they feel like they can't get ahead.
And then suddenly,
if they have to get taxed even more
to pay into this program
that they're not even going to receive
the benefits from,
you have this system where you can,
you have this dynamic where if you,
if you cut the benefits for the old people,
that's going to hurt them.
That's one solution.
Or if you raise the taxes for the young people,
that's going to hurt them.
And so you have this really terrible situation where it can lead to like a lot of generational
conflict.
Totally.
Right.
And so that's like the foreturning.
It's all coming to a head and there's not really a great solution on the table yet.
And so they're the two options that you see that's either tax young people or cut benefits.
Yeah.
Is there not an option where they will increase the age required to actually receive those payments?
They could.
Because that happened in the UK.
Yeah, and that happened in France too.
But that happened in France and there was riots on the street.
I don't mean they riot over anything.
Yeah, that's true.
That's true.
But I actually think about that a lot because it's like the fiat system steals time.
Yeah.
Which it's a terrible thing to have to just suddenly break the promise that they made to these people.
And you're paying into it your whole life than saying like, actually, you got to do it two more years.
Right.
And so that would take an act of Congress to do.
and and so they could do that um but the other thing they could do is try to print the difference
yeah try to fill that hole and that's where it gets kind of worrisome because we're talking about
to fill that hole would be about i ran the numbers you know anywhere from it's like another trillion
or so on top of the fiscal deficit that they're already running crazy right could blow out the
debt pretty large like very large and there's actually precedent for this so there's another
smaller trust in the United States called the Highway Trust. And it helps fund transportation
and highways and things like that, infrastructure. And it went insolvent in 2022. And that's exactly
what they did, was they basically did what they call a general transfer. Well, they just took the
money from the tax receipts, try to plug the hole for another five years, and it just added to the
debt. And so now that's going to go insolvent in 2027, and they're going to have to do the same
thing. So kicking the can down the road. But that trust is only like $75 billion. Social
Security is like $2.4 trillion. And so I'm worried because if they don't come up with any kind of
real solutions going up to that, that they might turn to that, like they did before with the Highway
Trust. And if they try to feel the difference, deficits will blow out. And then even the CBO
or the CFRB, which is another organization that follows us closely, they did a projection of what
that would happen if they did try to fill it. And they're trying to warn them, don't do this with
social security like you did with highway. Because if you do that, and interest rates rise because
there's worries about the debt blowing out when they do that, it just goes parabolic in terms of
the interest expense. And then you're in this situation where, I mean, massive currency debasement
will probably happen at that point.
And so it's all kind of coming to a head.
The train is, nothing stops this train,
but it's headed towards this cliff.
It's a cliff.
I wouldn't say cliff.
It's just like, it's an obstacle.
Like, it's like right there
and everyone knows it's coming,
but it's a long-term problem
that they've kicked down the road
over and over and over again.
But finally, this is like the real time
where it's going to come to a head
and we have to do something about that.
Yeah, and the problem is like
taxing young people more or reducing the payments for the older people, like both massively
politically unpopular. Like pressing the button is a much more subtle way. Like not everyone will
be paying attention to that. People will still think they're getting their money, even though
their cost of living might be increasing to a degree where they'd have been better just to take
a haircut on their payments. Yeah. And it's literally like a, it's kicking the can because
I mean, they'll fill the hole if they decide to do that for like another five years until it's the
same problem again. And you could kind of see the way the political system is and the gridlock
and nobody wants to deal with this stuff. It's like a likely scenario in my mind. Like they'll
turn to that or like a combination, right? They'll fill the gap. They'll maybe drop benefits a little
bit, tax a little bit more, but it can just lead to a big increase in the debt and a lot more
currency debasement. Yeah. I don't know if this is just because I'm in my little Bitcoin echo
chamber, but I've not really heard anyone talking about this. I mean, Lynn has mentioned on the show,
I think a couple of times over the past few years, but I've never heard, I've not really seen people
talking about this on Twitter much. And it seems like maybe the biggest like upcoming macro event
that we have. It's the biggest because everyone talks about the sustainability of the fiscal
outlook and the debt problem, but the debt problem is Medicare and social security. Like
if you don't touch that and it's such a, like you said, it's like so politically charged
and um i think there's gonna be it's gonna be the political topic over the next four or five it has
to be because if like stan druckenmiller gave a talk like three years ago in 2022 to usc
to the kids there i there's a transcript of it he gave this great speech and if you read it you can
just through his words like how terrified he is of this this fiscal outlook and for for the children
and how we have to start thinking about it.
Each year that we don't come up with any solution,
it gets worse and worse and worse.
And so this has been going on for a long time,
but again, it's like five to seven years away.
And we have to start thinking about it.
So potential solutions, like I said,
is cut benefits, raise taxes.
There's a couple other ones.
So Dr. Judy Shelton,
She's like an economist.
She's a sound money advocate.
She recently wrote a Wall Street Journal op-ed
that talked about gold-backed bonds.
And so it's basically you would attach gold
to like a treasury bond
to add some like inflation protection.
And then they would be probably really popular
so the government will be able to issue those
at a lower interest rate
and maybe like a 10-year note.
Because you're sharing in the appreciation
of the gold at the end of the...
Yeah, and you get gold at the end of the maturity.
And so you got that inflation protection.
So you could issue those more cheaply.
And so that would be a way for the government
to kind of finance itself in a way
that's less expensive for them.
Now, the problem with that is that's been done before.
And it was done during World War I.
They were called liberty bonds.
And there was a promise made in 20 years
that they would pay out in gold.
And so they were extremely popular.
They raised a ton of money for the war effort.
uh americans were willing to give them the money because they had that inflation it could be
redeemed in gold in 20 years and what happened though was fdr you know banned gold ownership
in 1933 and then there was a massive devaluation the next year and then when these bondholders
finally tried to redeem them they said well well it's illegal for you to own gold so you can have
the cheap dollars instead and then one of those liberty bondholders said like wait like
I just lost like 40%.
You just devalued the currency
and you're not going to give me gold like you promised.
This is like illegal.
And so it took them to the Supreme Court.
And the court said that,
yes, this was unconstitutional,
but we're not going to give you the award.
You get the dollars.
And so, you know,
it shows that there's two things wrong
with the gold-backed bonds.
It's you have to trust that the government
actually has the gold to pay out.
And you have to trust that they're actually
going to follow through on their promise. And so that brings me to a potential solution,
which is like the BitBonds. And like, we should be very open-minded to every single solution out
there because like I said, this is a big problem. And so if people are like, well, Bitcoin solves
this, like they should really keep an open mind because BitBonds is like a Liberty Bond,
but obviously a Bitcoin instead of the gold. And Bitcoin has outperformed gold over that time. So
but probably even better inflation over like a 10-year, 20-year timeline.
But it also is, it's like programmable money.
And so what you can do is like, you can put it in an address
and you know that they have the Bitcoin and they're not going to,
you don't have to trust that they have it in Fort Knox.
You can trust they have the Bitcoin.
And then you can actually do something like the mini scripts
and have it programmed so that it sweeps the Bitcoin unilaterally
at the end of the maturity so that the government can't rug pull them
like they did with the Liberty Bond.
and so and it's a way for they they could raise money at cheaper interest rates so
bit bonds were brought up by brian estes and perry and boring and eric weiss originally and
they there you can do different um structures with a bit bond but theirs was like a zero percent
interest rate so the government raising at zero percent that's pretty good um or like andrew
hones and matthew pines wrote a long report on their structure of a bit bond um it was a little
bit different, but it actually, the way they structure it where the government would actually
get some of the Bitcoin upside itself and it would go into the strategic Bitcoin reserve.
And then that's actually even a long-term solution to the debt problem because the government's
acquiring Bitcoin in the strategic reserve. And then over time, it can be used to extinguish the
debt. And so that's a solution that they should consider for this big, big problem that's coming
on the horizon. Yeah. And I mean, I really like the idea of Bitbombs. And I think it makes
potentially more sense doing it in the way
the government are sharing the upside because that
gives them an incentive to do it. I think
it's still a massive stretch to actually get them to do
something like that. Especially if you're
then going like, and also you can
do this mini script thing.
Yeah, I know. I think they're going to
if they did this, they would take custody
of it and then you do have the risk of
not actually getting paid out. True, true. I know.
But it's a good idea.
It's a solution. Yeah, no, it's a solution.
But yeah, you're right. It would have to be
designed the right way for investor protection, basically.
But it would probably be the most oversubscribed bond
the US government has issued in a very long time.
I would guess so.
Every Bitcoin product seems to be the most popular thing
whenever it happens, like the ETFs.
It's like Bitcoin, Bitcoin's very popular, very popular.
If you're already self-custody of Bitcoin,
you know the deal with hardware wallets.
Complex setups, clumsy interfaces,
and a seed phrase that can be lost, stolen, or forgotten.
Well, BitKey fixes that.
bitkey is a multi-sig hardware wallet built by the team behind square and cash app
it packs a cryptographic recovery system and built-in inheritance feature into an intuitive
easy to use wallet with no c phrase to sweat over it's simple secure self-custody without the stress
and time named bitkey one of the best inventions of 2024 get 20 off at bitkey.world when you use
the code WBD. That's B-I-T-K-E-Y dot world and use the code WBD. This episode is brought to you by
Anchor Watch. The thing that keeps me up at night is the idea of a critical error with my Bitcoin
cold storage. And this is where Anchor Watch comes in. With Anchor Watch, your Bitcoin is insured with
your own A-plus rated Lloyds of London insurance policy and all Bitcoin is held in their time-locked
multi-sig vaults. So you have the peace of mind knowing your Bitcoin is insured while not giving
up custody. So whether you're worried about inheritance planning, wrench attacks, natural
disasters, or just your own silly mistakes, you're protected by AnchorWatch. Rates for fully insured
custody start as low as 0.55% and are available for individual and commercial customers located in
the US. Speak to AnchorWatch for a quote and for more details about your security options and
coverage. Visit anchorwatch.com today. That is anchorwatch.com. What Bitcoin Did is brought to
by the massive legends iron the largest nasdaq listed bitcoin miner using 100 renewable energy
iron are not just powering the bitcoin network they're also providing cutting-edge computing
resources for ai all backed by renewable energy we've been working with their founders dan and
will for quite some time now and have been really impressed with their values especially their
commitment to local communities and sustainable computing power so whether you're interested in
mining bitcoin or harnessing ai compute power iron is setting the standard visit iron.com to learn
more, which is I-R-E-N.com. We should talk about the treasury company. We've got limited time today
and yeah, let's do it. You were one of the influencers that moved across to a treasury
company. I've been skeptical. I've told you this before. So I want you to explain what you're doing.
And my big question, like, so you're with Orange set up in Brazil. There's a lot of talk about
like jurisdictional arbitrage with treasury companies and the fact that like MetaPlanet's
in Japan, there's like different tax rules there. So there's an incentive to a meta planet if you're
in Japan. I've always been skeptical of that apart from like the very edge cases only because like
I live in Australia, I'm from the UK. And if I wanted to buy a treasury company, there's nothing
stopping me buying strategy. So like, why does that jurisdictional arbitrage exist in your opinion?
Well, it is like, it might be easier for somebody in Australia versus Brazil to access the US equity
markets, first off. And then, you know, retail investors, they do like to be supportive of their
own country, like a company that's building in their own country. So there's a bit of like a
nationality, a pride there. But there's also like institutional investors there. They have buckets
of like, they can only invest a certain amount into like foreign assets. A majority, they have
to invest domestically. So like the state pension funds, for instance. And so it's just a matter of
they can't just only invest in strategy or US equities. They have to allocate a significant
amount of capital into their own country. And so even that could be like if Orange BTC gets included
in the indices or different things in the Brazilian stock market, we'll benefit just from those flows.
So yes, they could access some US treasuries around the globe, but still there'll be a
significant amount of capital that has to be invested locally And that where we orange BTC would benefit Okay and so you got a little over 3 Bitcoin so far 3 Which is a lot of Bitcoin
How do you see this playing out in terms of the strategy?
They're almost in a different league to everyone else.
They've got so much Bitcoin.
The smaller treasury companies,
do you think they have any shot of catching strategy?
Or is it now everyone's playing for the second tier of treasury company?
Well, I think there's going to be a winner in every major capital market.
And even if you look at Brazil, a lot of the biggest banks are Brazilian banks.
It's hard to break into that market and build a big business there.
It kind of takes a local player who understands the regulations and has the connections to build a big business there.
And so strategy, I mean, strategy is in a league of its own.
I mean, they have more Bitcoin than all the other companies combined, all of the public companies combined.
Probably times two.
Yeah.
But 3,720 Bitcoin, we're the largest in Latin America by far.
By far.
And when you look at Latin America and compare it to the United States, in terms of getting Bitcoin exposure through publicly listed vehicles, there's really only three options in all Latin America.
It's orange BTC, there's an ETF, and there's Mayluse, which is the smaller Bitcoin treasury on B3. And that's it. In the United States, there's like 11 ETFs, there's all the public miners, there's Coinbase, there's all these infrastructure plays.
There's a lot of ways to get exposure, but not in Latin America. It's very underserved. And so that leads to a lot of demand for any kind of Bitcoin-backed security, whether that's equity, whether that's fixed income products down the road or anything like that. It fits into these institutions' investment mandates.
And so each capital market's really interesting because it has its different quirks.
Like Brazil, the pension funds and the insurance companies are restricted from owning spot Bitcoin.
They cannot do it.
And they only have investment mandates for securities.
So if they want any kind of Bitcoin exposure, they have to go to something like Orange BTC.
And so even Saylor talks about this.
97% of institutional capital, almost $100 trillion, have investment mandates for equity and bonds.
Yeah.
Right? And that's trapped capital. It's completely trapped. And, you know, in my opinion,
every single portfolio is better with Bitcoin in it, whether it's real Bitcoin or whether that's
Bitcoin exposure to these securities. No Bitcoin is a lot worse.
I agree with that.
Yeah. So like if we can improve accessibility and allow them to get exposure to it,
that benefits the pensioners, that benefits those insurance companies.
We're just trying to improve access there.
And so that's just a unique work of Brazil.
And then there's other things like it's a little bit more, there's some tax advantages.
There's a similar dynamic in MetaPlanet.
In Brazil, spot bitcoins tax, the capital gains is progressive.
The highest bracket's like 22.5%.
Domestic equities are flat at 15.
So there's a little bit of a tax advantage
from going to a domestic equity.
And so these little quirks are just more structural tailwinds
for a Bitcoin-backed security that we ultimately benefit from.
And so, you know, strategy,
you know, they did Stream, which is out in Europe now,
and they announced plans to expand to Canada.
and they likely will go to other capital markets.
But Brazil's probably pretty far down the list
because it's a little bit more complex
from a regulatory standpoint, being able to navigate that.
So it really does take a local player.
And our team's full of born and bred Brazilians
who have significant experience.
Our CFO ran a public company.
He was a C-suite executive of a public company there
for over a decade.
Our chairman ran BD for Bridgewater in Latin America.
And BlackRock, he stood up the alternative assets business.
He has a significant experience in Latin America.
Our CEO, Guy Gomez, grew up in Brazil, has a lot of contacts there, and has significant Bitcoin experience.
And so I think it's the right team to actually execute this.
and it's going to be different.
There's bigger, low-hanging fruit, let's say,
for strategy to attack other capital markets
and expand into other capital markets
before they think about coming down to Brazil.
And so that, again, is a significant opportunity for us
because Latin America is a huge market
and they really need Bitcoin.
And so that's where we're going to step in.
And it's all accretive to Bitcoin when it comes down to it.
So when you look at like the type of investors that are investing in Orange, is it retail or is it the institutional type clients?
Well, we just listed like eight weeks ago.
Okay.
And so we're talking with all those institutional investors.
Their investment process is longer.
It takes them a long time to actually pull the trigger.
And there's a lot of education that needs to be done.
And so our focus right now is educating the market about not just who Orange BTC is and what a Bitcoin treasury model is, but also what Bitcoin is.
And so we did the first institutional focus Bitcoin event in Brazil's history about a month ago.
So we had this.
How many people did you get?
It was about 300 to 400 people.
But really, the representation from the largest banks, largest asset managers and family offices, we were very, very happy with the turnout. And there's a lot of excitement from them. And I think they realized that Bitcoin's not going away. And they realized that they're maybe behind some of the United States, and they need to start moving into this asset class. And so the excitement from those big players in the market was really good to see.
And so we're having those conversations. We're educating those institutional investors. I think a lot of demand has been retail from the start, but we expect the institutional investors to come in over time because everyone needs Bitcoin.
And so what are you trading at compared to MNAV right now?
We're like right around one. I don't have to look, but it's been fluctuating from a little bit under one to a little bit over one. So we're pretty much like at MNAV right now.
Okay. And so do you think there's always going to be a gravity to one? Or do you think these multiples are going to expand again, like when Bitcoin price starts doing better?
Yeah, the way I think about it is, you know, all these debts, so to speak, all these Bitcoin treasury companies, they got to like earn the premium.
It comes down to execution. And there's different ways. Taking on leverage, large corporations with really strong balance sheets can get better terms on debt. And if you take on the debt and has good terms, and then you buy the Bitcoin and the Bitcoin outperforms the currency that it's denominated in, that's a creative share that'll increase Bitcoin per share.
And so if you bet on the growth of Bitcoin per share, that should have some kind of premium. Because if ETFs just flat at one and it's just a passive vehicle, and we're doing treasury operations and taking on good leverage to increase Bitcoin per share, that deserves some kind of premium.
them. The other thing is you can say buy Bitcoin at a discount. So for instance, when the MNAP
dropped below one, we have share repurchase programs. And so we buy back our shares that
is actually like buying Bitcoin at a discount and that it increases Bitcoin per share as well.
And so if you can acquire the Bitcoin at a discount, if you could take on leverage
that increases Bitcoin per share, both of those reasons are probably why Bitcoin or Bitcoin
treasury companies should trade at a premium to MNAV. Now, how do you sustain that? And that comes
down to execution. The other thing you could do is derivative strategies, for instance. That's
another example of something that an ETF doesn't do that could lead to more Bitcoin per share.
And we have very talented traders that have been trading for 20, 25 years, trading vols,
trading derivatives, to help us not only lower our cost basis and acquire the Bitcoin in a way
that it's more efficient,
but also generates some premium
and so allow us to acquire even more Bitcoin.
And so all those three things even right there,
probably reason why we should trade at a premium.
And then there's another one,
it's just this optionality of having a large Bitcoin.
So there's all kinds of things
that we could do in the future.
And one of the things that's been surprising,
even after eight weeks of being live,
is how many Bitcoin companies in Brazil
have reached out to us about potential strategic partnerships,
as well as companies abroad who are looking to expand into Brazil,
who want to partner with somebody who's there,
who, again, understands the market, understands the regulators,
has relationships already to find out strategic partnerships
to maybe launch some kind of Bitcoin financial services
or products in the future.
Now, it's early in our story, so we're listening,
we're building relationships,
but there's so many opportunities
to build out products and business lines.
So that optionality of the future,
it's just like you have to maybe,
if you're positive on that,
that should also create like a premium to the MNAF.
And then it comes down to execution, right?
And so that's another reason why there's risk
with these treasury companies as well,
which is why they should maybe trade at a discount sometimes
because if the management team doesn't manage risk well
and doesn't maybe takes on bad leverage,
they should be penalized for that
and maybe trade at a discount.
And so it works both ways.
And so there's risks where it can trade at a discount,
but if they execute
and they accumulate more Bitcoin per share
in a way that's faster than any kind of individual
and that's accretive to the shareholders,
then they should probably trade at a premium.
And so even strategy right now,
they're tapping the ATM,
they're doing all these things,
but their MNav is not going down to one.
It's at like 1.15, 1.17.
Now where that MNav is like going to stay
and that range,
are we going to see like 3, 4, 5, 7?
Like, I'm not sure.
Like it was definitely like a speculative mania
a little bit in the earlier of the summer
where you saw these crazy MNav expansions and premiums.
I don't know if we'll see it get way up there.
Like maybe if we see this like another wave like that.
But it probably should be above one
if the team's executing well and accumulating Bitcoin
with their treasury operations or other business lines.
I think we're just starting to see
where this treasury market's going to go.
So you saw like Fong Li, the CEO of Strategy,
just talking on television last week,
talking about large counterparties and banks
and how they might consider partnering with them,
whether like lending Bitcoin out to these counterparties
who are building out their own services
and they just need Bitcoin collateral.
And so it's like,
he who holds the Bitcoin makes the rules.
It's like Max Keiser.
Yeah.
It's the same thing.
And so these are all opportunities
that these treasury companies have
just because they have large,
like a lot of Bitcoin.
That's what it comes down to.
Yeah.
It's funny.
I was, Fong was on the show a couple,
like a month or two ago.
Nice.
And we were talking a little bit about,
like strategy obviously went through a really hard time.
They went, they started trading at a big discount.
three or four years ago.
And I wonder if it's almost like
the market is waiting to see
if people survive
a bear market in treasury companies
before they get full confidence
to invest in them.
And paper Bitcoin summer
is definitely over.
We're deep in paper Bitcoin winter.
A lot of these newer treasury companies
are trading at a very steep discount.
Do you think it's kind of
amount of time that people
are trading in the market
before the confidence is there
that these teams are going to survive?
They know how to do it.
They know how to operate.
and then we see like growth in multiples again.
Yeah, I think when market conditions turn
like how they have like in the last month,
it's actually an opportunity for a treasury company
and the management team to prove
that they've been thoughtful about their capital structure,
about the type of debt they take in,
about their ability to weather the storms.
That's one thing that strategy has
and maybe MetaPlanet that others don't
is like more of a track record.
And that just takes time to prove out,
to prove to the market and to shareholders
that you are a team that executes
and manages risk appropriately.
And so I think each treasury company
should be analyzed on a case-by-case basis,
and you really got to dig into the weeds
of their cap structure,
what kind of debt they've had,
what is their plans, what is their vision,
what is their access to the capital markets.
And each one should be just analyzed on its own terms.
And it's a way for the best ones to kind of separate themselves from the pack.
And so I actually see it as an opportunity.
You know, even right now, as Bitcoin has gone down a downturn, like Orange BTC has actually
continued to buy almost on a weekly basis.
And so we're proud of that because even during times of market stress, we're still accumulating
Bitcoin for our shareholders.
And, you know, we've been very thoughtful about how we structured the company and about the
type of leverage.
very clean balance sheet, low leverage ratio right now. And so we were built to last. This is a very
long-term gain. And so we have conviction in Bitcoin. We know that it's not going away. We
have a very strong balance sheet full of the best reserve asset. And so again, I think bear markets
and cycles, it's an opportunity for the best treasury companies to really show that we're
resilient and we're here to stay. How do you think about buying Bitcoin now? Because it feels like
the business model from the very early strategy days have changed a little bit. Like it's not
necessarily just selling common stock to buy Bitcoin now. Like strategy have all the preferreds.
What do you see the future of this being? Well, it's kind of like what I talked about before. I
I mean, so strategies farther along in that whole process.
But finding ways to get leverage that is,
that's in a way that's accretive to shareholders,
but also is a line where it's a long duration liability
with a long duration asset.
Like the preferreds are so interesting
because you never have to actually repay back the principal.
And it's just more of a dividend obligation over time.
So then you're just kind of managing that.
It's like that cash obligation over time.
But it's interesting because they're still accumulating Bitcoin.
They're just doing it through different products.
I liked what Jeff Walton said one time.
It's like when you're fishing and you're looking for different fish
and it's with different bait and at different depths
and it requires a little bit different strategy.
What Sailor's doing is just creating these products
that are attractive to different cohorts or investors.
And so some like the fixed income,
some are going to like the converts,
some are going to like just the common equity
because it's more volatile than the Bitcoin itself.
And so it's all meant to just accumulate more Bitcoin
onto the balance sheet,
but he's just providing different financial products
that are Bitcoin backed
that are attracted to different types of investors.
And so that's where we see ourselves going eventually.
But then, like I said, there's also all this other opportunities to build out different Bitcoin financial services in that market.
So Brazil, it's just, it's wide open in terms of all types of businesses.
I mean, and we're considering all of them.
You know, we have a history of building Bitcoin financial services.
We have experience in there.
And then our team has a lot of capital markets experience on this other side.
So it's a mix of the treasury operations, education, educating the market about Bitcoin,
as well as considering strategic partnerships with local players, as well as internationally,
and considering different lines of business down the road. So we see us being an entire Bitcoin hub
and just a leader in that entire region. So 3,700 Bitcoin is a lot of Bitcoin.
There's a lot of treasury companies that cropped up over the last however many
months that are a lot smaller than you guys.
And a lot of those are now trading at a discount.
Do you think the like your young company,
so I'm sure you're not thinking about this right now,
but do you think we're going to see a lot of acquisitions,
a lot of them consolidation in these treasury companies?
I know obviously similar going through this at the moment.
Like do you think that going to be a growing trend Because essentially if you trying to buy cheap Bitcoin you can buy Bitcoin at a discount by doing that Yeah No I think that going to be a natural maturation of this part of this ecosystem
It just makes sense.
I mean, if you can buy discounted Bitcoin,
then it's there.
It's just a decision, right?
Because when you buy Bitcoin,
one of the cool things about it
is the return on investment is so short,
meaning you know exactly,
you raise the money,
you turn around you bought bitcoin you know if it was like a creative to shareholders almost
immediately if you do a a acquisition it's a little bit harder for the market to kind of digest
it and understand it like is the transaction going to go through is it a creative they got
to do some math and so it's just a little bit more complicated for the market to understand like
was this uh a creative like because the bitcoin is the hurdle right so you gotta always think well
they could have just turned around about bitcoin so is this even better is this is this a discount
of Bitcoin given where our shares are trading versus their shares if this is like an all equity
transaction. So it just takes a little bit more thought for the market to understand it.
And it takes time to understand if that was a quality move or not. It moves it from
basically minutes, because the return on investment to just buy Bitcoin is like minutes,
to maybe months, even to years to understand if the acquisition was a good decision.
And so all of those options are available.
And I think if you see these companies
really trade at distress levels,
then you will see more M&A activity.
But it is a decision every single time
you raise capital and don't buy Bitcoin,
that's a decision you make.
And so you got to be right with your due diligence
and your analysts to make sure
that that is the right decision.
Because one of the things that makes me think of
is if you're a strategy
and you're looking at like all these other places
that might have a good incentive
to have a treasury company
in that country.
The idea of going through,
building a business out there,
putting a team in
seems much harder than just
waiting for something to trade
under 1XM NAV
and trying to acquire it
and then have something
in that jurisdiction.
Like if strategy
is a huge fish in this pond,
like do you think they end up
eating all the little fish
in different markets
and being a behemoth?
Well, it's probably
a better question for Fong or Sailor.
I know they've said that
they aren't interested in doing that
and it's probably related
to what I just said.
It's just harder for the market to understand
if it's an actual right decision or not.
But maybe, maybe.
I mean, for me,
if you're able to build a great brand
and have a great track record,
you get a lot of Bitcoin on your balance sheet.
You're right.
I mean, if strategy is looking into a market
and they don't know,
like I said, they don't know the players,
they don't have the network,
they don't have a relationship with the regulators
or the local banks,
it could be an easier decision for them to do it,
especially if they trust the management team.
You know, that's what it comes down to.
If they feel like acquiring that company is better
than them going in and building it themselves,
then maybe that's a decision they'll make.
So I wouldn't really be surprised.
I mean, maybe it's not even just strategy.
I mean, now you have 21 coming on board, right?
You're going to have ProCap Financial coming on board now.
They're finally going live.
And so you have these transactions finally closing.
We're about to get a couple of major players in this market too.
And then there's the Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company.
That's Adam Backs one.
And I bring those ones up because they also have a lot of Bitcoin.
And they could be successful in their own strategies in terms of acquiring Bitcoin.
And maybe they consider expanding globally.
And so there could be opportunities for acquisitions.
And that's the decision that they'll make.
I mean, you know, Orange BTC is just focused on our region, focused on Brazil, and accelerating Bitcoin adoption there.
And I think that's the right move for us.
Like, we're not thinking, like, we're just focused on our market right now and building a presence and a brand there.
So Jack's recently been quite vocal about trying to, I think at least, he's trying to separate himself from this idea of like a pure play Bitcoin treasury company.
and he's trying to push them as a Bitcoin company
that are trying to build services.
Is that something that you do at Orange
or are you just pure play on the treasury stuff?
I mean, we're an education company.
I mean, so we went public via reverse merger.
We took over an education company
and there's a lot of infrastructure there
and we plan on repurposing it for Bitcoin education.
So curriculum courses, educational content.
And so that's our focus right now.
But like I said, down the road,
we've been inundated with already opportunities.
We almost have to just focus on building out
our treasury operations right now.
And so right now, we're an education company
that also has treasury operations
that are implementing that sailor strategy,
so to speak, that business model.
But down the road, we see ourselves thinking through
what is the best use of our time
given our resources and the return on investment to go through whether that's you know i'm just
throwing this out like whether that's lending whether that's you know a credit or debit card
that's that provides bitcoin back you know the market is wide open that's what i mean in brazil
and so if a opportunity comes up and we think it's attractive um for not only ourselves but
also for bitcoin adoption we'll probably consider it and we have we have a experience as well with
Bitcoin financial services like Jack.
I don't know what Jack's going to do.
I'm so curious to see what 21 is.
I'm excited.
The beauty of this is it's all good for Bitcoin and Bitcoiners.
And so Jack's successful and 21's successful
and Michael's successful at strategy.
And it all leads to demand
and that strengthens every single balance sheet
that holds Bitcoin.
And so I'm just excited to see what he means by that
because there's a little bit of uncertainty.
but I want to bet against Jack or Apollo.
It's going to be great.
I'm excited to see more of these treasury companies pop up
because I think it's all good for Bitcoin.
I think some people are saying,
well, we should focus on payments.
We should focus on...
And to me, it's like if you're passionate about that
and that's what you want to focus on, great.
Make Bitcoin's payments better.
That's awesome.
And so treasury companies are like,
we're going to improve accessibility to Bitcoin
because there's large pools of capital
that can't buy us from Bitcoin,
but they can buy Bitcoin-backed security.
That's good for Bitcoin too.
And so I just see them as in parallel with one another.
And if you're passionate about something,
a specific part of Bitcoin,
then you should just focus your time and energy
and build stuff around it
because it's all going to come together
and it's all going to help push Bitcoin adoption
at the end of the day.
Yeah, my left curve take is buying Bitcoin is kind of cool.
Buying Bitcoin is cool.
Yeah, that's great.
The big, one of the reasons I'm skeptical is like on the underlying business that these treasury companies have.
Like, I don't know if it matters.
Like, I don't know if that actually plays any part in the treasury companies, even like strategy.
Like they have a cash flowing business that's pretty large, but I don't know if it matters.
Like, I don't think anyone's buying either the common stock or the preferreds because of the underlying business.
You mean the software business?
Yeah.
Well, I would say their business now
is almost like a digital credit issuer
or like a Bitcoin financing franchise
is what Matt Levine at Bloomberg called it.
They're an issuer of Bitcoin-backed credit products,
and that's a business.
That's a business in itself.
But they also have a software business.
Yeah, does anyone care about the software business?
Well, I think their investor base
has changed dramatically since they've adopted Bitcoin
and developed this strategy.
I think it's become maybe less important over time,
but at the same time, I think there's a large part
of their business that's also just focused on that
in terms of the people, and they're still building products.
They're still making millions of dollars
through that business line.
Maybe over time, it might get less important
as Bitcoin grows in adoption,
and the Bitcoin part of their business grows.
But I wouldn't say it doesn't matter.
I think shareholders in general are more Bitcoin-focused
and they've benefited from that.
But I think it still matters.
I think at the end of the day,
it's kind of complementary to their strategy.
I would be a little bit surprised.
I could be proven completely wrong here
if that part of the company still exists in 10 years' time.
I imagine they just become a Bitcoin bank and that bit's lost.
Yeah, I mean, I could see that.
I might agree with that.
So Bitcoin treasury companies are good for Bitcoin?
Yes.
Tell me why they are not.
No, I don't think they're bad for Bitcoin.
I don't know if they're necessarily good for all the investors,
but I think they're good for Bitcoin.
They're buying more Bitcoin.
That's cool.
Well, why not?
Why do you think they're not good for the investors, I guess?
I guess maybe I'm specifically talking about retail investors.
I think people should just be buying Bitcoin.
because I think MNAV is going to be super volatile.
I think there is probably a gravity to one.
So if there's a gravity to one,
why not just own Bitcoin?
And that gravity could be below one.
I don't know.
Yeah, no, you got to earn the premium.
That's kind of what I said earlier.
And it's also, it's more volatile than Bitcoin.
I mean, that's right.
But some people want that.
Yeah, for sure.
They want that upside.
But that upside doesn't come without downside risk too.
Yeah, and I'm like, I'm nothing against it.
no no i'm trying to understand it because there is it's a it's a divisive uh issue on x and stuff
and i it's hard for me to understand because i always saw bitcoin adoption happening this way
of like corporate adoption having bitcoin back credit products like i always saw this happening
and i think maybe people are a little upset because they it's not like spot bitcoin but if you
nothing beats like if you want to own the asset,
to remove counterparty risk,
to have censorship resistance,
if you want the capital efficiency,
meaning like you got to make cross-border payments.
Like there's so many things that only Bitcoin,
spot Bitcoin could do.
And it's not to say that that's not awesome.
And like a good, to me, it's like a foundational asset
in every single portfolio should have spot Bitcoin,
you know, in self-custody.
It's something I've been passionate about for a very long time.
I just think some people also want amplified Bitcoin, as Michael says it, or simply it's in like a 401k.
Like I have a 401k and I own a Bitcoin ETF because I can't buy Bitcoin in that 401k.
So that's what I mean.
It's just the way that capital markets are structured.
You just have these siloed pools of capital that can't buy it.
And so now we're saying, hey, we're going to inject Bitcoin into there as well.
So nothing replicates spot Bitcoin in self-custody.
It has unique value propositions.
And I think everyone kind of benefits from that.
That's not to mean that there's not usefulness
for other Bitcoin backed securities as well.
No, I agree with that.
And I think you're right.
Like this was always going to happen as Bitcoin gets adopted.
There's always going to be corporations buying Bitcoin,
doing these financial gains with them.
And I think that's cool.
I'm not against it at all.
The issue I have is, like, if you're selling spot Bitcoin to speculate on treasury companies, I think that might be a bad idea.
Like, you might get it right, but, like, spot Bitcoin is the sacred part of the bottom of this entire stack, and, like, you should just be saving that.
Like, if it's a 401k, something that you can't access spot Bitcoin, like, different story.
And if you're, like, an institution that can't buy spot Bitcoin, different story.
But I just, the idea of, like, Bitcoin is selling their Bitcoin to buy a treasury company is the part that I don't like.
Yeah, I think it's about understanding the risk return trade-offs. Because when you're
buying Bitcoin, the risk is like protocol risk when it comes down to it. And when you buy an
equity in a Bitcoin treasury company, you're moving it from protocol risk to the management team,
and trusting the management team to execute on the strategy to accumulate Bitcoin faster than
you could yourself to increase Bitcoin per share on your behalf. And so you're moving that risk from
the protocol, which I think we both agree is like, there's nothing more secure than the Bitcoin
network right now. That's another thing of the fundamentals, like got hash rate above one zeta
hash. I mean, it's amazing. That's one of the more bullish charts out there, I think.
So you're moving the risk from the protocol risks to humans, you know, and their ability to execute
on the strategy.
And so you got to understand
the risk return you're taking
and that you're moving it
from the Bitcoin network
to humans and their ability to execute.
So just being clear about that risk,
like doing due diligence,
understanding what you own
in both Bitcoin
and a Bitcoin treasury company
is so important
before you make that decision.
And that's kind of,
that's how I think about it.
Yeah.
And like the reason I would tell people
not to like sell Bitcoin
to buy a treasury company
the same reason I'd tell people not to sell Bitcoin now hoping to buy back lower. Like you
want to protect your Bitcoin, but if you are in like a trap pool of capital, then having exposure
to Bitcoin is better than almost anything else. So I just think it's like, what I haven't enjoyed
is like the retail fervor around the treasury companies, because I think most people have
probably not done very well on that. It's like people that have made loads of money on strategy,
then those people have lost loads of money on strategy.
And like selling Bitcoin to speculate on a treasury company,
I think might end up hurting you.
Yeah, I don't know.
I mean, it's a bit if they were trying to trade.
I mean, I think most people have made a great amount of money
with the strategy over a long period of time.
I mean, it's still one of the best performing stocks
of all the S&P 500.
I think only NVIDIA, since they adopted Bitcoin,
has outperformed it now.
But we know that retail buys the top.
Yeah, so it's, well, it's just a matter.
again it's about like position sizing understand what you own and you're right it's just about
education and um same thing with the bitcoin we say the same thing with bitcoin right i mean
people the one thing i worry like i agree with you a little bit is i get worried when people
skip bitcoin and don't understand bitcoin and all the great things about it and then just go straight
into uh these dots and it's more of a trade for them and they don't really care about what the
the Bitcoin strategy is.
They don't really understand
what they're even doing.
They're just seeing a stock ticker going up.
That's where I get concerned
because like you gotta,
it's, Bitcoin's such an awesome,
awesome thing.
It's just like,
it's such a cool technology
and there's so many great things
about the asset to own.
And they're really missing the point
if they don't do that education
to understand why strategies
acquiring Bitcoin
and why Bitcoin's cool
and why it's important.
And so I hope,
I hope if anybody's listening to this
who skip that, go back to the first principles
and just learn about Bitcoin
and then make a decision from there.
This is why the Bitcoin treasury companies
are accumulating Bitcoin because we love Bitcoin
and we want to drive its adoption
because we think it's the most important technology
of the 21st century.
And it's solving the biggest problem of the 21st century,
which is currency debasement and the inability to save.
So that's the advice that I would give.
You've just, you got to start with Bitcoin
and then go from there.
And maybe strategy was a bad example there,
but we're at David Bailey's conference,
so I'm sorry, David,
but look at all the people that invest in NACA.
It can be brutal.
And if you're selling Bitcoin thinking
that thing's going to pump when it goes public,
you're down a hell of a lot of money.
And sometimes just owning Bitcoin
and playing the long game is probably the best option.
Like I said, there's nothing that competes with Bitcoin
in terms of like the risk adjusted returns,
I guess you could say.
Yeah.
When you're comparing these things.
And, you know, I own Bitcoin
because of the potential, obviously,
but also all the risk I remove when I own it
compared to all the other asset classes.
And I think it's like an important differentiation
to think about.
And because people see risk,
they see volatility when they look at Bitcoin.
But all I see is like removal of risk.
Like you're removing counterparty risk,
you're removing business risk,
sector risk, management risk. And that's really attractive. It's the same reason why a lot of
people own gold. And so nothing really competes with Bitcoin for long periods of time. But
we know that it's very difficult to outperform Bitcoin. One way to outperform it would be to
get more Bitcoin and accumulate more Bitcoin and leverage Bitcoin play. And that's what Bitcoin
treasury companies are. And so you're taking on more risk, but you could potentially outperform
Bitcoin even. So that's why people are attracted to it.
Yeah. It's going to be an interesting couple of years to see how this all plays out.
Keep buying Bitcoin, Sam.
We're going to do that. That's the plan. Educate and accumulate. That's the plan.
Awesome. Thank you for the time, man. It's been good.
Yeah. Thanks, man. Appreciate it.
Thank you.