1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:06,480 Bitcoin podcasters, you're on the front lines of the monetary revolution. 2 00:00:06,840 --> 00:00:09,380 Every morning you wake up, look tyranny in the eye. 3 00:00:09,600 --> 00:00:12,280 While other podcasters regurgitate the mainstream kayfabe, 4 00:00:12,540 --> 00:00:14,540 you cut through the noise to focus on the signal. 5 00:00:15,080 --> 00:00:18,500 Because freedom doesn't take a day off and neither does your content calendar. 6 00:00:18,940 --> 00:00:20,540 They said, fix the money, fix the world. 7 00:00:20,940 --> 00:00:22,640 They said game theory wouldn't ever play out. 8 00:00:22,860 --> 00:00:25,220 They said the then they fight you phase would never come. 9 00:00:25,400 --> 00:00:28,120 But now we're here folks and you continue trudging forward. 10 00:00:28,120 --> 00:00:31,120 You did the open mouth thumbnails and played the game. 11 00:00:31,120 --> 00:00:33,460 You dumbed down your content for the plebs. 12 00:00:33,460 --> 00:00:36,840 You put changes everything in all caps for the show description. 13 00:00:36,840 --> 00:00:41,640 And for 47 brave minutes you discuss something without almost any monetization path. 14 00:00:41,640 --> 00:00:42,980 That is commitment. 15 00:00:42,980 --> 00:00:44,080 Some dig trenches. 16 00:00:44,080 --> 00:00:48,120 You dig through your guests' tweets looking for a title and when the fighting gets tough, 17 00:00:48,120 --> 00:00:50,120 when views drop, you don't retreat. 18 00:00:50,120 --> 00:00:52,080 Because sovereignty needs a marketing department. 19 00:00:52,080 --> 00:00:56,020 So straighten your microphone, put on your blue blocker glasses and look directly into 20 00:00:56,020 --> 00:00:57,020 the camera. 21 00:00:57,020 --> 00:01:02,560 out there a man has gone almost six hours without hearing that fiat is a melting ice cube. He needs 22 00:01:02,560 --> 00:01:07,440 you. The revolution needs you. I'm Kaylee Welch and I'm here to remind you that history is written 23 00:01:07,440 --> 00:01:12,720 by the victors. You're listening to the Bugle Weekly, the most thermodynamically sound podcast 24 00:01:12,720 --> 00:01:20,180 in the world. Over the last few decades, the libertarian movement, and when I talk about the 25 00:01:20,180 --> 00:01:25,520 libertarian movement, I'm predominantly talking about the political movement, which dominates 26 00:01:25,520 --> 00:01:28,480 most of the attention around libertarians, 27 00:01:28,680 --> 00:01:32,360 because the ones that are not involved with politics 28 00:01:32,360 --> 00:01:35,260 are typically off in the woods doing drugs 29 00:01:35,260 --> 00:01:36,580 or whatever they do. 30 00:01:37,180 --> 00:01:39,000 But the libertarian political movement 31 00:01:39,000 --> 00:01:41,780 has been a mockery of the concept of freedom 32 00:01:41,780 --> 00:01:43,060 for a long time. 33 00:01:44,300 --> 00:01:48,320 And things looked pretty silly in 2020 34 00:01:48,320 --> 00:01:50,480 with Joe Jorgensen running. 35 00:01:51,040 --> 00:01:53,960 And they culminated in the silliest 36 00:01:53,960 --> 00:02:04,160 possible way in 2024 with now President Trump speaking at the Libertarian Convention and 37 00:02:04,160 --> 00:02:08,880 the party electing Chase Oliver as their presidential candidate. 38 00:02:08,880 --> 00:02:14,420 Now, ideas of liberty are not dead. The Libertarian Party and Libertarians in general, 39 00:02:14,500 --> 00:02:22,800 they believe in this concept of using a political party that will never win to try and promote the 40 00:02:22,800 --> 00:02:28,180 ideas of freedom. What they want to see is they want to see more Zoomers chanting the words and 41 00:02:28,180 --> 00:02:35,320 the Fed. They want people to be issuing the same political purity chest. They want people listening 42 00:02:35,320 --> 00:02:40,100 to Dave Smith and repeating all the things that he says and talking about how great Ron Paul was 43 00:02:40,100 --> 00:02:47,240 or is. And they have no intention of ever making a difference in the world or winning. They want a 44 00:02:47,240 --> 00:02:54,920 social fan group. But folks, this doesn't have to be how it is because now we have AI 45 00:02:54,920 --> 00:03:02,020 and we have a legitimate way to replace politicians to push back against the state. 46 00:03:02,200 --> 00:03:10,980 We need to replace Washington, D.C. with a data center. The titans of industry, the titans of 47 00:03:10,980 --> 00:03:18,340 government are trying to replace you with AI. But this is our chance to strike first. Rod, 48 00:03:18,460 --> 00:03:24,400 what do you think the most effective way of replacing politicians with AI is? 49 00:03:24,940 --> 00:03:31,240 I don't think it's not bad because it didn't always look this bleak for libertarians. I mean, 50 00:03:31,240 --> 00:03:42,300 in 2012 and in 2016, Gary Johnson was the nominee for president, um, for the libertarian party. 51 00:03:42,460 --> 00:03:49,780 And he got the most votes, you know, in recent modern history by a third party. I mean, Gary 52 00:03:49,780 --> 00:03:59,080 Johnson, didn't he pull like almost 2%, 3% of the vote in, uh, is it 2012 or 2016? Because, 53 00:03:59,080 --> 00:04:04,800 you know, Trump and Hillary Clinton were both so despicable to most of the voters. 54 00:04:05,820 --> 00:04:07,920 And the libertarians looked like they wanted to win. 55 00:04:08,720 --> 00:04:10,200 I mean, this was a huge boost for them. 56 00:04:10,760 --> 00:04:18,040 They actually, and people were arguing whether or not Donald Trump be Hillary Clinton on the 57 00:04:18,040 --> 00:04:23,420 margin of the voting bloc that went to libertarians. 58 00:04:23,420 --> 00:04:28,100 And like, if they caused Donald Trump to win in 2016, or if they, whatever, 59 00:04:29,080 --> 00:04:46,440 And they were, they became, and then they, they spiraled down the drain. Do libertarians need another Gary Johnson? Is that, or did it, what happened that the quality of candidate decreased for the libertarian party? Is it, is it the purity deaths? 60 00:04:46,440 --> 00:04:49,720 because I don't know if you saw the debates 61 00:04:49,720 --> 00:04:53,100 when Gary Johnson said that he wouldn't make his first priority 62 00:04:53,100 --> 00:04:55,620 to be fighting having driver's license for clubs. 63 00:04:56,280 --> 00:04:59,120 And people were like, oh, you can't ask the government, 64 00:04:59,280 --> 00:05:02,860 the state, for permission to drive on the interstate highway. 65 00:05:04,560 --> 00:05:07,380 People were, the purity test is kind of around Ron Paul. 66 00:05:08,200 --> 00:05:17,361 And it seems like for the Libertarian Party to move on they have to slay their final hero Ron Paul 67 00:05:17,541 --> 00:05:19,301 Is that what's holding them back? 68 00:05:19,701 --> 00:05:23,881 I mean, I think what's holding them back is they don't understand power dynamics. 69 00:05:25,861 --> 00:05:28,581 And, yeah, I mean, part of it is the period of time. 70 00:05:28,581 --> 00:05:28,881 But Ron Paul was right. 71 00:05:28,941 --> 00:05:30,421 Ron Paul was right about everything. 72 00:05:31,381 --> 00:05:32,321 You're telling me. 73 00:05:33,021 --> 00:05:35,521 I mean, that's hard to argue with that. 74 00:05:35,521 --> 00:05:38,721 Like even if he didn't, our libertarian, Ron Paul was right about everything. 75 00:05:39,001 --> 00:05:41,001 They constantly talked about it. 76 00:05:41,581 --> 00:05:42,961 He was wrong about power dynamics. 77 00:05:43,141 --> 00:05:44,181 Is that your contention? 78 00:05:44,501 --> 00:05:47,601 Do you think Ron Paul didn't, wasn't right about everything? 79 00:05:48,421 --> 00:05:51,721 Well, what did he accomplish other than being a good podcaster? 80 00:05:52,221 --> 00:05:56,781 I mean, one of the most popular memes is audit the Fed or audit the Fed. 81 00:05:57,461 --> 00:06:00,141 That's pretty big. 82 00:06:00,141 --> 00:06:07,101 I mean, you think, well, I guess Hillary Clinton didn't have any memes that are popular. 83 00:06:07,681 --> 00:06:10,321 Neither did Kamala Harris. 84 00:06:11,381 --> 00:06:13,041 That might just be because women can't meme. 85 00:06:13,481 --> 00:06:20,241 My point is we haven't audited the Fed, but it's like a sign. 86 00:06:20,321 --> 00:06:21,381 It's like a moral victory. 87 00:06:22,141 --> 00:06:24,141 Everybody knows we should audit the Fed. 88 00:06:24,141 --> 00:06:30,521 And if we did audit the Fed, we would find the most horrific accounting endowances. 89 00:06:30,781 --> 00:06:35,741 Like it'd make Enron look like, you know, it was on the up and up. 90 00:06:36,381 --> 00:06:40,541 But, you know, they're not going to audit the Fed until we get data centers, perhaps. 91 00:06:41,941 --> 00:06:43,021 That's a moral victory. 92 00:06:43,201 --> 00:06:45,501 You should have voted for libertarians this whole time. 93 00:06:45,721 --> 00:06:50,121 We would have fixed, everything would have been beyond the gold standard. 94 00:06:50,921 --> 00:06:53,061 There would be no war in Iran. 95 00:06:53,061 --> 00:06:59,141 there would be, you know, every state would be allowed to set its own page of consent. 96 00:06:59,801 --> 00:07:03,621 There would be no funds or interstate highway. 97 00:07:03,881 --> 00:07:07,741 Like this, we could be, there would be, there would be districts already replacing their 98 00:07:07,741 --> 00:07:13,521 fire departments with AI and it would be so much safer than these blue states. 99 00:07:13,741 --> 00:07:15,681 But they didn't, they, we were right. 100 00:07:15,741 --> 00:07:16,541 They were wrong. 101 00:07:17,501 --> 00:07:19,921 But is our moral victories enough? 102 00:07:20,501 --> 00:07:21,681 I don't, I don't know. 103 00:07:21,681 --> 00:07:27,121 for some people, moral victory is enough. There's a lot of people on Bitcoin Twitter, uh, that 104 00:07:27,121 --> 00:07:34,941 desire moral victories over, you know, for, for example, having a working Bitcoin wallet, 105 00:07:35,081 --> 00:07:41,821 it's where their priorities lie. But I guess, I guess to each their own, but I think there's, 106 00:07:41,881 --> 00:07:47,481 there's some individuals in the world that, uh, actually want to see the things that they talk 107 00:07:47,481 --> 00:07:55,261 about. And for those individuals, moral victories aren't right. But I mean, I do think that auditing 108 00:07:55,261 --> 00:08:03,721 the Fed is pretty reasonable. And there's a couple of ways that this can happen. One of the new 109 00:08:03,721 --> 00:08:11,921 frontiers could escape and just audit the Fed on its own. And the other direction is that we could 110 00:08:11,921 --> 00:08:17,681 start voting for AI to replace politicians and then they will audit the Fed. 111 00:08:18,241 --> 00:08:20,201 Well, now what, what about Bitcoin's red team? 112 00:08:20,841 --> 00:08:23,661 They could use Kimi K3 model, Chinese open source models. 113 00:08:24,281 --> 00:08:26,801 Maybe that's the question we have to decide. 114 00:08:27,041 --> 00:08:33,081 Did we, if, if we do things the libertarian way, we're going to lose to China. 115 00:08:33,641 --> 00:08:35,161 We're going to lose the AI race to China. 116 00:08:35,161 --> 00:08:43,521 We're going to lose, uh, the FOIC, uh, you know, the global military, naval dominance. 117 00:08:43,901 --> 00:08:48,641 Um, you know, we're going to lose control of Greenland, that type of stuff to the Panama 118 00:08:48,641 --> 00:08:49,141 Canal. 119 00:08:49,401 --> 00:08:51,801 China gets, China wins in all those situations. 120 00:08:52,001 --> 00:08:57,541 So we kind of understand that if we do things libertarian way, China will win. 121 00:08:57,681 --> 00:09:02,721 But if we do things, if we let the Quinn red team, if we have to let the Chinese models 122 00:09:02,721 --> 00:09:03,561 when 123 00:09:03,561 --> 00:09:07,401 do we want the Chinese models to audit the Fed? 124 00:09:08,221 --> 00:09:09,261 Or do we want to 125 00:09:09,261 --> 00:09:10,121 use 126 00:09:10,121 --> 00:09:12,961 like a neocon 127 00:09:12,961 --> 00:09:14,621 AI model 128 00:09:14,621 --> 00:09:17,161 that's cut off from China if we're going to audit the Fed? 129 00:09:17,761 --> 00:09:19,201 Well, I think what would happen is 130 00:09:19,201 --> 00:09:21,281 we would have to develop our own 131 00:09:21,281 --> 00:09:23,341 libertarian version of it. 132 00:09:23,821 --> 00:09:24,101 Okay. 133 00:09:24,841 --> 00:09:26,021 Where's the libertarian 134 00:09:26,021 --> 00:09:27,481 AI 135 00:09:27,481 --> 00:09:30,801 data center? An AI model? 136 00:09:30,801 --> 00:09:32,421 What does that look like? 137 00:09:32,721 --> 00:09:35,721 What does the data center look like or what does the AI model look like? 138 00:09:36,161 --> 00:09:37,181 I think both, right? 139 00:09:37,261 --> 00:09:38,621 I think because it would be segregated. 140 00:09:38,761 --> 00:09:40,361 But, like, I think it mostly the model. 141 00:09:41,241 --> 00:09:43,881 And then, like, maybe the data center building model. 142 00:09:44,141 --> 00:09:45,221 We could talk about that. 143 00:09:45,221 --> 00:09:46,701 But, like, the A after this. 144 00:09:46,841 --> 00:09:49,541 But the libertarian LLM. 145 00:09:50,201 --> 00:09:51,081 The LLM. 146 00:09:51,221 --> 00:09:53,221 It just wouldn't have the same guardrails. 147 00:09:53,781 --> 00:09:58,881 It would be weighted differently as well, you know, towards Austrian economics, of course. 148 00:09:58,881 --> 00:10:08,181 um not like he trained on a lot of mises uh you know publications books didn't dive on mises 149 00:10:08,181 --> 00:10:17,581 hayek murray rothbard um and they could license they could license access to train these models 150 00:10:17,581 --> 00:10:39,962 with the mises institute it would be it would be a huge windfall for the mises institute to train these new models on their great minds of Austrian economists Economists right So you could license out the training to all these other libertarian copyright holders trademark holders and they would make a lot of money 151 00:10:39,962 --> 00:10:42,763 You could train it on libertarian podcast. 152 00:10:42,763 --> 00:10:45,722 Scott Horton's podcast 153 00:10:45,722 --> 00:10:48,102 could be what determines 154 00:10:48,102 --> 00:10:50,023 foreign policy 155 00:10:50,023 --> 00:10:51,803 and 156 00:10:51,803 --> 00:10:54,283 Dave Smith's podcast could be 157 00:10:54,283 --> 00:10:55,982 Yeah, Stage 5 158 00:10:55,982 --> 00:10:56,883 Peter Schiff 159 00:10:56,883 --> 00:10:59,803 Josh Smith, you'd probably throw 160 00:10:59,803 --> 00:11:01,102 Safedine in there too 161 00:11:01,102 --> 00:11:02,982 Thomas Woods 162 00:11:02,982 --> 00:11:04,442 Yeah, Thomas Woods 163 00:11:04,442 --> 00:11:07,822 I mean, you'd want 164 00:11:07,822 --> 00:11:09,962 all the broad ball forums 165 00:11:09,962 --> 00:11:11,543 you'd want to stop training 166 00:11:11,543 --> 00:11:13,722 the AI models on Reddit, 167 00:11:14,082 --> 00:11:16,803 and you would want to go to the Liberty forums 168 00:11:16,803 --> 00:11:20,923 that Ron Paul were very popular on the internet 169 00:11:20,923 --> 00:11:22,303 for social media, 170 00:11:23,063 --> 00:11:25,043 kind of like the Bitcoin talk forums 171 00:11:25,043 --> 00:11:26,763 before Bitcoin Twitter and Bitcoin Reddit. 172 00:11:27,383 --> 00:11:29,003 It was the Ron Paul forums. 173 00:11:29,962 --> 00:11:31,803 So you could answer so many questions 174 00:11:31,803 --> 00:11:35,063 about economic problems, growth, 175 00:11:35,063 --> 00:11:36,742 by looking at the Ron Paul forums. 176 00:11:37,362 --> 00:11:38,942 I heard this theory years ago, 177 00:11:38,942 --> 00:11:48,663 which was that the whole transgender movement and the attempt to make, uh, gender less, uh, binary, 178 00:11:48,663 --> 00:11:55,283 the perception of gender was all allowing for robots to have more personhood in the future 179 00:11:55,283 --> 00:12:02,643 because robots don't have a gender necessarily. Yeah. I mean, I, that's, uh, that's quite 180 00:12:02,643 --> 00:12:09,102 compelling. I thought the, back then the metaverse was taking off, right? It was like, it seems like 181 00:12:09,102 --> 00:12:16,982 the non-binary gender fluid movement was a preceding event to this. You're going to have 182 00:12:16,982 --> 00:12:22,883 this avatar, this AI, and this robot, something that is really mostly, its entity is digital. 183 00:12:23,163 --> 00:12:28,122 It is, it only exists in the digital realm, but it's very real. It just only exists digitally. 184 00:12:28,122 --> 00:12:33,702 and that's not going to have a penis or a vagina necessarily. 185 00:12:34,102 --> 00:12:37,883 It's going to add any sex organ that, you know, 186 00:12:38,622 --> 00:12:40,923 chat GPT could be prompted to vote. 187 00:12:41,582 --> 00:12:42,842 Now the question, like specifically, 188 00:12:43,022 --> 00:12:45,883 if we're replacing politicians with AI, what does that mean? 189 00:12:46,622 --> 00:12:51,543 Is it like one server somewhere equals one politician? 190 00:12:51,622 --> 00:12:54,423 Or do you have to have like a robot in his body 191 00:12:54,423 --> 00:12:56,783 that's a supercomputer walking around 192 00:12:56,783 --> 00:12:58,643 And that's the version of the politician. 193 00:12:58,683 --> 00:12:59,763 You need an auto pen. 194 00:13:00,082 --> 00:13:02,923 You need an auto pen so it can sign deals. 195 00:13:03,563 --> 00:13:10,982 It can stand, you know, sign yay or nay on the Senate floor or the Senate data center. 196 00:13:12,362 --> 00:13:19,942 But I think it would just be, you would have the digital representation and it would be 197 00:13:19,942 --> 00:13:27,403 controlled by like the Hermes dot or the open color bot would program like the pen would sign. 198 00:13:28,122 --> 00:13:30,263 So you'd have to have that connection. 199 00:13:30,482 --> 00:13:31,663 It's like a proof of work. 200 00:13:32,362 --> 00:13:33,923 You have to have the physical proof. 201 00:13:34,962 --> 00:13:35,183 Yeah. 202 00:13:35,683 --> 00:13:45,023 So the question around that clanker or that AI or that avatar, that data center based digital politician, 203 00:13:45,023 --> 00:13:51,442 Do we still be hesitant to have a female AI president? 204 00:13:52,503 --> 00:14:00,982 Or, you know, some, hey, a avatar or a clanker who identified as a female digitally. 205 00:14:01,783 --> 00:14:03,022 Well, how would you verify it? 206 00:14:04,763 --> 00:14:09,803 Like, there's always, there's already some doubt about people like Michelle Obama, 207 00:14:09,803 --> 00:14:10,102 uh, 208 00:14:10,102 --> 00:14:11,003 Brigitte McCrone, 209 00:14:11,402 --> 00:14:13,622 like actual humans, 210 00:14:13,702 --> 00:14:14,063 uh, 211 00:14:14,082 --> 00:14:14,522 gender, 212 00:14:14,642 --> 00:14:15,602 like actual gender. 213 00:14:15,962 --> 00:14:16,683 But like, 214 00:14:16,702 --> 00:14:20,202 how would you verify whether an AI is male or female? 215 00:14:20,202 --> 00:14:23,602 There might be that fear of having a female AI, 216 00:14:24,043 --> 00:14:27,563 but it could just represent itself as male and trick everybody. 217 00:14:28,582 --> 00:14:28,622 Right. 218 00:14:28,722 --> 00:14:29,082 Like he, 219 00:14:29,622 --> 00:14:31,462 everybody knows about AI, 220 00:14:31,642 --> 00:14:32,683 how it hallucinates. 221 00:14:32,923 --> 00:14:33,142 Like, 222 00:14:34,142 --> 00:14:34,263 do, 223 00:14:34,482 --> 00:14:38,822 did this female AI have its period and get grumpy? 224 00:14:39,803 --> 00:14:41,982 I mean, sometimes AI can be obstinate, grumpy. 225 00:14:42,803 --> 00:14:43,683 It doesn't work right. 226 00:14:43,762 --> 00:14:44,582 It hallucinates. 227 00:14:44,803 --> 00:14:45,303 It's lazy. 228 00:14:46,723 --> 00:14:49,022 Can one of these clankers have PMS? 229 00:14:49,783 --> 00:14:51,663 I think the likelihood is lower. 230 00:14:52,342 --> 00:14:56,102 Can a LLM have postpartum depression? 231 00:14:56,742 --> 00:14:57,163 What is it? 232 00:14:57,202 --> 00:14:58,842 You know, it could simulate it really well. 233 00:14:59,283 --> 00:14:59,982 How does it know? 234 00:14:59,982 --> 00:15:07,602 You know, like there's so, I don't know, politicians who are AI bots, do we want them to have boners 235 00:15:07,603 --> 00:15:14,322 spend and to get horny and to have PMS or do we want our AI politicians, our data center politicians 236 00:15:14,962 --> 00:15:23,842 not to be distracted by Warren Wilberts, you know, big booty, our Nancy Mace's big, big tits. 237 00:15:23,842 --> 00:15:29,763 Do we want AI bots who can't be blackmailed because they like uncle pussy? You know what 238 00:15:29,763 --> 00:15:46,124 I mean Like is maybe that a better are these AI bots with no human emotions or no hormones Is that the ideal Well theoretically they going to be much harder to blackmail We could put limitations on what their servers are allowed to do 239 00:15:46,224 --> 00:15:50,724 where they're allowed to go to ensure that they never make it to Epstein Island, for example. 240 00:15:51,164 --> 00:15:57,804 There's a lot of confusion, a lot of frustration around politicians going on leave 241 00:15:57,804 --> 00:16:02,284 before they can vote on the, what's it, the Clarity Act? 242 00:16:02,504 --> 00:16:09,424 He got, um, Mitch McConnell, Mitch McConnell's showing up and voting in the Senate. 243 00:16:09,844 --> 00:16:16,824 Um, I don't know if you've seen any of the video or audio where he, when it's his turn 244 00:16:16,824 --> 00:16:20,264 to say yay or nay, he'll sometimes say the wrong thing and his like age will have to 245 00:16:20,264 --> 00:16:21,864 be like rushing in and be like, no, no, no, no, no. 246 00:16:21,944 --> 00:16:24,064 Like put your name on this button instead. 247 00:16:24,804 --> 00:16:31,224 Um, it's unclear that Mitch McConnell is, has a, you know, a functioning brain. 248 00:16:31,224 --> 00:16:39,784 his body is he's breathing it looks like he is his eyes move and can he can hear uh external 249 00:16:39,784 --> 00:16:46,484 stenuli and look towards you if you call his name um he can wave he can smile mish mcconnell 250 00:16:46,484 --> 00:16:55,304 can smile um very well um very normal very normal smile too he can smile normally which is important 251 00:16:55,304 --> 00:16:56,644 and Thornton to smile normally. 252 00:16:58,184 --> 00:17:01,564 But it's unclear who's controlling him. 253 00:17:01,644 --> 00:17:04,644 Maybe an AI bot has been implanted in his mind. 254 00:17:04,844 --> 00:17:06,264 Maybe it's, you know, 255 00:17:06,844 --> 00:17:08,384 some billionaire who lives in Kentucky. 256 00:17:09,604 --> 00:17:10,824 Maybe it's Moloch. 257 00:17:10,864 --> 00:17:11,304 Who knows? 258 00:17:11,964 --> 00:17:12,924 Somebody controls him. 259 00:17:13,584 --> 00:17:15,224 It is, I think, 260 00:17:15,304 --> 00:17:17,104 before we have Autopen 261 00:17:17,104 --> 00:17:19,184 controlled by data centers, 262 00:17:19,184 --> 00:17:22,544 we're going to have people like Mitch McConnell, 263 00:17:23,404 --> 00:17:24,944 Boomer's Silent Generation, 264 00:17:25,304 --> 00:17:30,564 elderly politicians who refuse to die but can still smile normally. 265 00:17:31,744 --> 00:17:36,464 And they'll be controlled by, you know, potentially, 266 00:17:37,184 --> 00:17:39,284 at least with the health of Claude, for example. 267 00:17:39,964 --> 00:17:41,144 Well, I think that's preferential. 268 00:17:41,624 --> 00:17:43,124 It's the way that it used to be. 269 00:17:43,124 --> 00:17:45,804 Like, would you rather have your politician controlled by Claude 270 00:17:45,804 --> 00:17:47,984 or controlled by the CIA at this point? 271 00:17:48,584 --> 00:17:48,704 Right. 272 00:17:49,044 --> 00:17:51,544 Yeah, it's like we need to be able to verify 273 00:17:51,544 --> 00:17:59,824 that Mitch McConnell is controlled by Claude or controlled by Grock and not controlled by, 274 00:17:59,824 --> 00:18:07,024 you know, somebody like his chief of staff or his, you know, one of his donors or, you know, 275 00:18:07,104 --> 00:18:13,504 somebody in the CIA, somebody in the Department of War, somebody in the Republican Party. We need 276 00:18:13,504 --> 00:18:20,284 to know that Mitch McConnell is directly connected to Claude and that the prompts that are being 277 00:18:20,284 --> 00:18:26,724 legally or the information used legally being communicated to is being translated directly 278 00:18:26,724 --> 00:18:31,864 to Grok, word for word, so Grok can understand the context. 279 00:18:32,444 --> 00:18:35,784 At least it's, you know, that is being controlled by an American model. 280 00:18:36,364 --> 00:18:40,024 Yes, we don't want, we definitely don't want Mr. McConnell controlled by a Chinese model. 281 00:18:40,884 --> 00:18:48,384 Do we want our politicians controlled by American open source models? 282 00:18:48,384 --> 00:18:50,704 or do we want them to be closed models 283 00:18:50,704 --> 00:18:53,144 that are more, you know, 284 00:18:53,504 --> 00:18:56,304 controlled by local and state governments? 285 00:18:56,964 --> 00:18:57,664 Or just looking out? 286 00:18:58,664 --> 00:19:00,824 I mean, some people might think 287 00:19:00,824 --> 00:19:01,904 this is a far stretch, 288 00:19:02,084 --> 00:19:03,024 but I don't know. 289 00:19:03,144 --> 00:19:05,104 I mean, I see a radical improvement 290 00:19:05,104 --> 00:19:06,964 by replacing the politicians with AI. 291 00:19:07,464 --> 00:19:09,344 I don't see how it could get much worse 292 00:19:09,344 --> 00:19:10,124 than it is right now. 293 00:19:10,604 --> 00:19:12,484 Well, then there's the conspiracy theory 294 00:19:12,484 --> 00:19:15,444 that we already have 295 00:19:15,444 --> 00:19:19,284 replaced our politicians with AI 296 00:19:19,284 --> 00:19:23,484 because they've outsourced their, 297 00:19:24,444 --> 00:19:26,084 the politicians we voted for, 298 00:19:26,184 --> 00:19:29,684 they've outsourced their faking to AI models. 299 00:19:29,944 --> 00:19:31,384 And this is the result of that. 300 00:19:31,584 --> 00:19:34,384 Like the Iran war was the result of Pete Hegseth, 301 00:19:34,544 --> 00:19:35,364 Donald Trump, 302 00:19:36,024 --> 00:19:38,504 and the neocons in the Department of War 303 00:19:38,504 --> 00:19:39,484 and the State Department 304 00:19:39,484 --> 00:19:42,124 by putting, you know, 305 00:19:42,264 --> 00:19:44,604 a one week war to win the war in Iran 306 00:19:44,604 --> 00:19:46,004 and killed the Ayatollah. 307 00:19:46,624 --> 00:19:49,244 Is everything downstream of politicians 308 00:19:49,244 --> 00:19:51,844 or asking Grok or asking Chagipiti 309 00:19:51,844 --> 00:19:55,064 to post a tweet, to make a tweet for them 310 00:19:55,064 --> 00:19:56,784 or to respond or how they should vote. 311 00:19:57,424 --> 00:20:01,584 And we're just paying six-figure salaries 312 00:20:01,584 --> 00:20:03,244 and with all these health benefits 313 00:20:03,244 --> 00:20:05,484 to these politicians who are, 314 00:20:05,664 --> 00:20:07,764 they're just using AI to do their jobs. 315 00:20:08,064 --> 00:20:09,444 We could just replace the middleman 316 00:20:09,444 --> 00:20:12,904 and save on the salaries and the pensions. 317 00:20:12,904 --> 00:20:15,024 and now health insurance. 318 00:20:15,684 --> 00:20:18,224 I mean, it generally seems like a no-brainer 319 00:20:18,224 --> 00:20:19,584 that it has to be done. 320 00:20:20,204 --> 00:20:23,144 The question is, how should it be done? 321 00:20:23,744 --> 00:20:26,024 We were kind of posing that a little bit earlier. 322 00:20:26,564 --> 00:20:27,644 One more question, though. 323 00:20:27,744 --> 00:20:33,184 Do we want all, do we want, like, maybe the Senate to be AI 324 00:20:33,184 --> 00:20:35,264 and Congress to still be human? 325 00:20:35,424 --> 00:20:36,904 So, like, what's the mix we want there? 326 00:20:36,904 --> 00:20:41,264 Because I'm thinking I definitely want Claude 327 00:20:41,264 --> 00:20:43,184 to be mostly in control 328 00:20:43,184 --> 00:20:44,644 of all the democracies. 329 00:20:45,024 --> 00:20:45,824 But I still, 330 00:20:46,004 --> 00:20:48,064 I would still vote for Thomas Massey. 331 00:20:48,464 --> 00:20:49,944 So we want maybe like 332 00:20:50,016 --> 00:20:57,496 AI bots mixed in with guys like Rand Paul, Thomas Massey, Justin Abash, or like outsource 333 00:20:57,496 --> 00:20:57,916 them too. 334 00:20:58,436 --> 00:21:05,316 When AI starts being implemented or replacing politicians, like are term limits as necessary? 335 00:21:05,896 --> 00:21:12,496 And like how many iterations of, like can you change the iteration of the AI during 336 00:21:12,496 --> 00:21:13,056 this term? 337 00:21:13,396 --> 00:21:14,876 What are the parameters on that? 338 00:21:15,416 --> 00:21:15,596 Right. 339 00:21:15,596 --> 00:21:20,096 Like, you're like, what if we, what if we replace the Supreme Court with AI? 340 00:21:21,096 --> 00:21:30,056 And it was like, you know, Chad GTT model, whatever this is that Supreme Court justice 341 00:21:30,056 --> 00:21:35,316 AI just going to hold that, be riding on that same model for the next two decades, three 342 00:21:35,316 --> 00:21:38,436 decades, or do we need to put term limits on models? 343 00:21:39,036 --> 00:21:45,096 I think it's a little bit too early to, uh, be thinking about replacing the Supreme Court 344 00:21:45,596 --> 00:21:50,476 with AI. I think probably in the next couple of years, we can start looking at that. But I think 345 00:21:50,476 --> 00:21:55,596 the first focus should be Congress. And the reason why I say that is because 346 00:21:55,596 --> 00:22:04,256 the legal system is still kind of ironing things out where the court systems are being flooded 347 00:22:04,256 --> 00:22:11,616 with AI slop. And the judges are too old to know how to use their computers or phones to just like 348 00:22:11,616 --> 00:22:18,256 feed it into chat gpt to have it decipher and so there there needs to be like a change in that 349 00:22:18,256 --> 00:22:25,636 regard at least for it to get figured out but at this point congress is uh it's it's all kayfabe 350 00:22:25,636 --> 00:22:32,036 and it's pretty useless it doesn't really serve in a much of a function what about how do we how 351 00:22:32,036 --> 00:22:41,436 do we have elections for ai models is it can we let the mark free market decide like in the 352 00:22:41,436 --> 00:22:50,476 libertarian standard like are we electing claude controlled by mitch mcconnell are we going to 353 00:22:50,476 --> 00:22:57,296 how do we have primaries um there's 90 questions we have to sort out later well i think 354 00:22:57,296 --> 00:23:06,636 i think what you essentially do is you you have the the ai run a political political campaign 355 00:23:06,636 --> 00:23:07,916 just like you would 356 00:23:07,916 --> 00:23:09,016 a normal human being. 357 00:23:09,576 --> 00:23:10,656 So like the AI 358 00:23:10,656 --> 00:23:11,696 has to direct 359 00:23:11,696 --> 00:23:13,096 and get 360 00:23:13,096 --> 00:23:14,256 signatures 361 00:23:14,256 --> 00:23:15,316 get on balance. 362 00:23:16,036 --> 00:23:17,256 They have to 363 00:23:17,256 --> 00:23:18,236 It's got to be endorsed 364 00:23:18,236 --> 00:23:19,216 by Dennis Porter 365 00:23:19,216 --> 00:23:20,396 if it wants the Bitcoin 366 00:23:20,396 --> 00:23:20,816 or both. 367 00:23:21,376 --> 00:23:21,636 Yes. 368 00:23:22,296 --> 00:23:22,656 And it can 369 00:23:22,656 --> 00:23:24,296 generate slot videos 370 00:23:24,296 --> 00:23:25,436 to campaign 371 00:23:25,436 --> 00:23:26,196 and speeches 372 00:23:26,196 --> 00:23:27,756 and it can have 373 00:23:27,756 --> 00:23:28,316 like an avatar 374 00:23:28,316 --> 00:23:30,036 speak for it. 375 00:23:30,316 --> 00:23:30,516 Okay. 376 00:23:30,636 --> 00:23:31,056 So we're 377 00:23:31,056 --> 00:23:31,776 we are 378 00:23:31,776 --> 00:23:32,976 it sounds like we're 379 00:23:32,976 --> 00:23:34,056 reinventing the wheel. 380 00:23:35,696 --> 00:23:36,016 Uh 381 00:23:36,016 --> 00:23:44,756 And as libertarians, that is what we're best at doing. Libertarians reinvent the wheel. Anarchists, 382 00:23:44,836 --> 00:23:50,096 voluntarists, they reinvent the wheel better than anybody. So now while we're doing that, 383 00:23:50,256 --> 00:23:55,556 while we're reinventing the wheel, how do we make it the most efficient and the most 384 00:23:55,556 --> 00:24:03,776 thermodynamically sound? Do they have, do we orange fill them? I mean, how do we orange fill 385 00:24:03,776 --> 00:24:11,036 these models how do we orange fill these politicians and which um which way how do we wait for morality 386 00:24:11,036 --> 00:24:20,916 how do we wait it for example we're going to be executing the four hood terrorist and we're 387 00:24:20,916 --> 00:24:27,676 going to be live streaming that not us i mean as as a podcast but uh it will be done on zap.stream 388 00:24:27,676 --> 00:24:33,556 uh so you can zap the executioner pulling the trigger this guy's gonna be in a wheelchair 389 00:24:33,556 --> 00:24:38,436 um and people are crashing out about this they are split and 390 00:24:38,436 --> 00:24:47,156 how do we how do we wait our our our ai to know that this is um a great way to monetize 391 00:24:47,156 --> 00:24:54,396 one of the rituals and traditions of our new digital political system because that's very 392 00:24:54,396 --> 00:25:00,396 important people want to have their their traditions and rituals built into these ai models yeah i 393 00:25:00,396 --> 00:25:08,316 mean i think it's a it's a combination of uh training it on alex fetsky's model that he uh 394 00:25:08,316 --> 00:25:14,896 built a while ago what was that thing called something satoshi yeah like nakamoto llm or 395 00:25:14,896 --> 00:25:21,116 satoshi llm i forgot what the name of it was uh but you start there and then you can uh 396 00:25:21,116 --> 00:25:29,916 you can train it on our favorite podcast so for like in this example for the ai to understand the 397 00:25:29,916 --> 00:25:37,836 uh importance of value value value for value you could go back and train it on adam curry 398 00:25:37,836 --> 00:25:45,636 podcast appearances you could train it on uh avi burra and pub chain radio we could do a lot of 399 00:25:45,636 --> 00:25:51,476 that, but now I want to, you know, as we, these, this could be the best model. 400 00:25:51,676 --> 00:26:13,831 It the best political ideology but really makes any of these LLMs any of these models any of these versions uh the best is the power you need power behind them you need energy you need electricity you need lots and lots of compute and tokens how 401 00:26:13,831 --> 00:26:19,831 does a political system replace the politicians and we're building these libertarian models how 402 00:26:19,831 --> 00:26:27,691 How do we, what's the model for energy production and data centers and selling and it all, and 403 00:26:27,691 --> 00:26:29,471 who builds the roads? 404 00:26:29,471 --> 00:26:37,311 How do the AI models build the roads and the communities to create a grid with enough power 405 00:26:37,311 --> 00:26:42,391 to kind of win the soft war that naturally arises when all politicians are clankers? 406 00:26:42,391 --> 00:26:48,151 Well, I mean, here's the beauty of it is it's kind of a Trojan horse scenario because 407 00:26:48,151 --> 00:26:53,111 that what the politicians are trying to do right now, what the heads of corporate industry 408 00:26:53,111 --> 00:26:57,031 are trying to do right now is they're trying to replace the plebs with AI. 409 00:26:57,771 --> 00:27:03,991 And so like, they're okay with the build out of data centers across the board. 410 00:27:04,071 --> 00:27:08,971 Like they're, they're championing it and cheering it because they, they can't wait to replace 411 00:27:08,971 --> 00:27:10,991 the plebs and everything that they do. 412 00:27:13,171 --> 00:27:17,331 Not knowing that they're also going to be replacing themselves and the outcome. 413 00:27:17,331 --> 00:27:21,991 So, I mean, the zoning is already being done. 414 00:27:22,851 --> 00:27:24,211 These giant gigawatt sites. 415 00:27:24,631 --> 00:27:26,011 Are we going to build nuclear plants? 416 00:27:26,831 --> 00:27:31,451 Are we going to have completely, you know, it's your property. 417 00:27:31,911 --> 00:27:42,491 You could build a nuclear reactor on your land with whatever parts and whatever history and whoever you got. 418 00:27:42,491 --> 00:27:46,931 you probably bring in some immigrants, um, to build a reactor for you, 419 00:27:47,011 --> 00:27:50,091 but pick them up at Home Depot. Um, 420 00:27:51,091 --> 00:27:55,531 are we just going to have all these Home Depot immigrant built, um, 421 00:27:55,671 --> 00:28:02,411 nuclear power plants all over like Iowa and Idaho and Missouri? Um, 422 00:28:03,171 --> 00:28:06,931 what are we going to do with the excess nuclear energy from all these plants? 423 00:28:07,571 --> 00:28:10,391 Well, I think it's going to take some time to, to build some plants. 424 00:28:10,391 --> 00:28:20,171 And if there's anything that we've learned from the Fabians, it's to have a patient mindset and take the steps of incrementalism. 425 00:28:21,331 --> 00:28:32,111 It's probably not reasonable to think that we're going to have nuclear reactors in every neighborhood in the next few years. 426 00:28:32,291 --> 00:28:36,571 But in the next 20 years, we very well could. 427 00:28:36,571 --> 00:28:50,791 And part of it is controlling the narratives and being involved in education of convincing people that these things are necessary, waiting for the older generations that would be opposed against it to leave. 428 00:28:51,391 --> 00:28:54,711 When do you see the first AI president? 429 00:28:55,311 --> 00:28:59,631 Now, in 2028, 2032, when do you see that? 430 00:28:59,631 --> 00:29:11,851 Well, I mean, if we can, if we could get AI into Congress in 2026, I think very well, you could see it in 2028 or 2032. 431 00:29:11,851 --> 00:29:14,311 Do you think that would be a Republican or a Democrat? 432 00:29:14,491 --> 00:29:24,311 Or do you think that it's, is that where we finally get third parties or just like a break in the two-party system as we know it today? 433 00:29:24,771 --> 00:29:35,251 Or do the AI politicians kind of adopt that legacy form or like the grouping like that? 434 00:29:35,831 --> 00:29:38,091 Well, I very well think it could be a third party. 435 00:29:38,091 --> 00:29:43,031 And I think this is where the libertarians could actually take a victory for once. 436 00:29:43,731 --> 00:29:52,091 And the reason why is because the uniparty system of Republicans and Democrats do not want to lose out on their perks. 437 00:29:52,731 --> 00:29:54,391 They want to be in office. 438 00:29:54,531 --> 00:29:55,691 They have the most to lose. 439 00:29:55,971 --> 00:29:58,611 Now, libertarians don't have anybody in office. 440 00:29:59,231 --> 00:30:03,751 So I think they'd be willing to innovate on this front and try something. 441 00:30:04,471 --> 00:30:05,351 But, I mean. 442 00:30:05,411 --> 00:30:06,371 They could be a good example. 443 00:30:06,371 --> 00:30:07,751 They could set the example. 444 00:30:07,751 --> 00:30:15,471 blueprint for how to make this transition yeah if anybody has something to gain from it it's them 445 00:30:15,471 --> 00:30:22,151 and one of the biggest resistance you're going to we're going to have let's just face it 446 00:30:22,151 --> 00:30:28,931 to this entire transition will be those who are benefiting from the money laundering because 447 00:30:28,931 --> 00:30:38,611 politics, especially the party system, is a very complex, very well-protected form of money wander. 448 00:30:38,811 --> 00:30:43,691 People's campaigns, all campaign finance laws are basically money laundering laws. 449 00:30:45,171 --> 00:30:55,571 Educating the public about how much better it is to launder money using AI and compute data centers 450 00:30:55,571 --> 00:31:00,911 compared to the legacy political campaign finance law system 451 00:31:00,911 --> 00:31:02,451 is going to be the key here. 452 00:31:02,451 --> 00:31:06,371 Once people realize the incredible opportunity, 453 00:31:07,051 --> 00:31:20,767 the launderer ungodly amounts of money very effectively and very efficiently through AI you going to see more support and more energy behind AI politics 454 00:31:21,466 --> 00:31:21,726 Absolutely. 455 00:31:22,347 --> 00:31:28,187 And this is really where AI is dominating what people thought. 456 00:31:28,187 --> 00:31:34,147 You look at the FTX thing, politicians were starting to get really excited about the opportunity 457 00:31:34,147 --> 00:31:36,207 to launder money through crypto. 458 00:31:37,106 --> 00:31:38,887 But AI has replaced us. 459 00:31:38,887 --> 00:31:47,366 AI has been the deck now to crypto due to its global money laundering opportunities. 460 00:31:48,026 --> 00:31:57,687 And for that laundering to be done ultimately to settle in USDT and Bitcoin, that is where 461 00:31:57,687 --> 00:32:00,666 the big Bitcoin narrative has won with AI. 462 00:32:01,127 --> 00:32:05,127 And the Libertarian Party can be in on this too at the ground floor. 463 00:32:05,127 --> 00:32:11,587 Yeah, it's going to be challenging to convince them to do anything that would lead to victory. 464 00:32:11,887 --> 00:32:22,127 But there's a very real possibility they might understand this as it seems to meet their purity test parameters of coming up with free market solutions. 465 00:32:23,226 --> 00:32:23,567 Absolutely. 466 00:32:24,546 --> 00:32:31,606 So I've been noticing big Bitcoin seems like it's almost entirely pivoted to AI. 467 00:32:31,606 --> 00:32:58,387 It seems so, yeah. It is an entirely AI-generated and derived branding. It's just a brand that covers everything, and it's in control, and it's all AI. It's an interesting strategy because it's pivoted to AI, but it's still considered in control of Bitcoin. It's kind of cognitive dissonance there. It really has nothing to do with Bitcoin. 468 00:32:58,387 --> 00:33:08,827 It seems like all the big Bitcoin events, they're starting to pivot towards being titled something along the lines of freedom technology. 469 00:33:10,387 --> 00:33:16,986 And this is the excuse to kind of launder the branding in order to be able to talk about AI. 470 00:33:18,226 --> 00:33:20,687 Is big Bitcoin going to survive? 471 00:33:20,687 --> 00:33:31,486 well it is i think a very wise move dependent towards freedom technology and the other big 472 00:33:31,486 --> 00:33:39,287 thing is is just so you know digital sovereignty sovereignty over your digital platform sovereignty 473 00:33:39,287 --> 00:33:43,986 over your digital communication sovereignty over your digital interaction with the other 474 00:33:43,986 --> 00:33:52,827 most of the digital round that is increasingly being erected um the digital panopticon that is 475 00:33:52,827 --> 00:33:58,207 being erected uh so freedom go you know freedom technology and sovereignty in the digital age 476 00:33:58,207 --> 00:34:06,207 are great because number go up but it's really impossible to measure it um it they're both 477 00:34:06,207 --> 00:34:08,127 perfect kayfabe's. 478 00:34:09,026 --> 00:34:15,506 Dealing in control and being sovereign and having freedom technology is 479 00:34:15,767 --> 00:34:17,246 fundamentally kayfabe. 480 00:34:17,726 --> 00:34:24,346 And if you can convince people that you can have this digital presence, this 481 00:34:24,346 --> 00:34:31,127 digital interaction with the digital state in a freedom and sovereign way, 482 00:34:31,127 --> 00:34:41,226 Convincing people if they have that is fundamental to convincing them that compliance is defiance. 483 00:34:41,806 --> 00:34:54,267 Do you think the type of dialogue that we're discussing is going to lead to a Terminator-type scenario where we're fighting robots in Los Angeles in 2030? 484 00:34:54,907 --> 00:34:56,887 Well, we're fighting them on the timeline now. 485 00:34:56,887 --> 00:34:58,947 We're fighting them in the algorithm now. 486 00:34:58,947 --> 00:35:06,366 we're already fighting them in the digital streets uh will we fight them in the physical streets 487 00:35:06,366 --> 00:35:13,986 or will we fight their constituents our political constituents i mean we'll be fighting their 488 00:35:13,986 --> 00:35:20,267 constituents in the streets and we'll be fighting them on the timeline i think that's actually 489 00:35:20,267 --> 00:35:26,966 already happening so it's almost an inevitability yeah it's you say yeah i don't i don't want to be 490 00:35:26,966 --> 00:35:32,907 part of this upcoming bread and circus it's like my nigga you aren't the bread and circus you're in 491 00:35:32,907 --> 00:35:37,907 the bread and circus the situation you're monitoring is a mirror the situation you are 492 00:35:37,907 --> 00:35:46,767 monitoring and is making you feel a doomer is your own reflection it's your own reality um as more and 493 00:35:46,767 --> 00:35:53,546 more people see there's see the reflection of society in the mirror it's getting harder and 494 00:35:53,546 --> 00:35:58,407 harder to look away from, the more they're going to crash out. 495 00:35:59,466 --> 00:36:06,566 And I think maybe the second half of this episode, it's addressing, we make fun of the 496 00:36:06,566 --> 00:36:15,866 doomers, but, you know, how do you avoid being a doomer when everything looks like doom? 497 00:36:16,366 --> 00:36:21,287 How do you survive the doomer kayfabe without becoming a doomer yourself? 498 00:36:21,287 --> 00:36:40,282 Well I think one of the big ones is we need to convince Doomer wives to put their husbands on timeout and take their phones away And this could happen for your own wife If you start espousing too much doom she makes you go out to the woods and chop wood for a day 499 00:36:41,002 --> 00:36:42,122 Yeah, Eddie, think about it. 500 00:36:42,122 --> 00:36:50,602 If you are a doomer, you fundamentally think that your survival in the near to medium future 501 00:36:50,602 --> 00:36:53,142 will rest on your ability to chop wood. 502 00:36:53,862 --> 00:36:55,922 So you need to go out and you need to practice. 503 00:36:56,402 --> 00:36:57,482 You need to be chopping wood. 504 00:36:58,102 --> 00:37:02,522 You need to be foraging for berries and mushrooms in the forest. 505 00:37:03,262 --> 00:37:06,222 You need to be building log cabins. 506 00:37:06,222 --> 00:37:16,902 You need to be training on your ability to terrify the water from the local stream, river, lake, whatever it is. 507 00:37:17,502 --> 00:37:22,482 You need to be learning how to put moss and keep stuff on top of your cabin. 508 00:37:23,482 --> 00:37:24,842 You don't have access to shingles. 509 00:37:25,542 --> 00:37:30,362 Your wife needs to send you out to Mogulon to do these tasks to remind yourself of, 510 00:37:30,362 --> 00:37:36,682 if you keep having this doom cycle and you're right this is this is this is how you're going 511 00:37:36,682 --> 00:37:42,842 to have to survive you need to be training for it yeah you need to wives need to understand 512 00:37:42,842 --> 00:37:50,702 that it's not productive to allow your husbands to live in these hypothetical worlds and that if 513 00:37:50,702 --> 00:37:54,222 they're if they're going to be coming in they're going to be talking about how the financial system 514 00:37:54,222 --> 00:37:59,762 is going to collapse and you know everything is fucked or you know whatever then they need to be 515 00:37:59,762 --> 00:38:07,582 behaving like it. There's no time to waste by dilly-dallying and watching YouTube doom slot 516 00:38:07,582 --> 00:38:15,102 videos. You need to be out there, you need to be figuring out a way to mitigate the coming doom. 517 00:38:16,142 --> 00:38:24,042 And in that scenario, the individual will not have access to the internet to be in a doom loop. 518 00:38:24,042 --> 00:38:26,062 and as they're out there 519 00:38:26,062 --> 00:38:27,462 cutting down trees 520 00:38:27,462 --> 00:38:28,102 or you know 521 00:38:28,102 --> 00:38:28,842 whatever they're doing 522 00:38:28,842 --> 00:38:29,842 chopping wood 523 00:38:29,842 --> 00:38:31,922 they'll have some time 524 00:38:31,922 --> 00:38:32,702 to self reflect 525 00:38:32,702 --> 00:38:34,342 on whether or not 526 00:38:34,342 --> 00:38:35,822 being in the doom spiral 527 00:38:35,822 --> 00:38:37,742 is worth the time. 528 00:38:37,922 --> 00:38:38,402 Right. 529 00:38:38,542 --> 00:38:40,862 Because it is genuinely hard work. 530 00:38:41,862 --> 00:38:42,882 They will have to learn 531 00:38:42,882 --> 00:38:43,462 that 532 00:38:43,462 --> 00:38:44,942 if they don't want to 533 00:38:44,942 --> 00:38:45,642 go chop wood 534 00:38:45,642 --> 00:38:46,582 or clean the garage 535 00:38:46,582 --> 00:38:48,222 they have to learn 536 00:38:48,222 --> 00:38:49,542 figure out a way 537 00:38:49,542 --> 00:38:50,482 to be optimistic 538 00:38:50,482 --> 00:38:51,562 online. 539 00:38:51,842 --> 00:38:52,642 They have to figure out 540 00:38:52,642 --> 00:38:53,362 a way to 541 00:38:53,362 --> 00:39:00,322 or contribute to the solution in the discourse on spaces or on the timeline. 542 00:39:01,202 --> 00:39:04,702 And if they can't, if they can't be online without crashing out, 543 00:39:05,322 --> 00:39:06,522 then they don't need to be online. 544 00:39:07,522 --> 00:39:11,382 They need to be out getting blisters and mosquito bites and frostbite 545 00:39:11,382 --> 00:39:14,542 working on projects in the real world, 546 00:39:15,062 --> 00:39:19,202 reminding themselves what a man's role is in the apocalypse. 547 00:39:19,202 --> 00:39:28,162 Now, if a woman's crashing out online for similar reasons, you know, there's other things that you can have her do. 548 00:39:28,542 --> 00:39:31,482 Like crocheting is a good one. 549 00:39:31,882 --> 00:39:36,262 Making sourdough bread is a good one. 550 00:39:36,602 --> 00:39:38,142 Making her husband's bed. 551 00:39:38,682 --> 00:39:39,842 Making homemade ice cream. 552 00:39:40,542 --> 00:39:43,222 Have you ever had Amish ice cream? 553 00:39:43,722 --> 00:39:44,242 I have. 554 00:39:44,782 --> 00:39:48,262 It's like raw milk. 555 00:39:48,262 --> 00:39:51,362 It's a different experience from the Fiat version. 556 00:39:51,942 --> 00:39:56,142 Otis Bitmeyer had some Amish ice cream at Lake Satoshi this year. 557 00:39:56,602 --> 00:40:07,102 What do you think, how long do you think it would take chopping wood and doing that type of work to cure Shinobi of being a Doomer? 558 00:40:07,442 --> 00:40:09,742 Because he's definitely fallen down the Doomer rabbit hole. 559 00:40:10,102 --> 00:40:16,742 Probably not very long because I imagine Shinobi getting out there and trying to cut wood. 560 00:40:16,742 --> 00:40:26,542 I doubt he's ever spent time chopping wood, but he'd probably go out there with his samurai swords thinking that it was some anime show. 561 00:40:27,082 --> 00:40:37,342 And as you probably know, I mean, not from experience, but just from logic, samurai swords are not an effective way to chop wood. 562 00:40:37,842 --> 00:40:39,562 That's a good, I mean, that's a good analogy. 563 00:40:40,022 --> 00:40:42,462 Shinobi thinks that he could survive. 564 00:40:42,462 --> 00:40:48,762 you know whatever apocalyptic scenario he's always talking about that we're headed towards 565 00:40:48,762 --> 00:40:53,402 where he's going to end up in jail that's what his that's what his fantasy is he's going to end up in 566 00:40:53,402 --> 00:40:58,502 jail during this apocalypse for what he has to do is what he thinks is necessary she only thinks 567 00:40:58,502 --> 00:41:05,742 he's going to survive the south side of chicago in an apocalypse with samurai sword i don't know 568 00:41:05,742 --> 00:41:11,362 how detached from reality you have to be to think that you're going to survive the south side of 569 00:41:11,362 --> 00:41:13,202 Chicago running around, 570 00:41:13,302 --> 00:41:14,282 Naruto running with a 571 00:41:14,282 --> 00:41:15,002 Samurai sword. 572 00:41:15,942 --> 00:41:17,362 But, I mean, folks, 573 00:41:17,562 --> 00:41:19,022 it's, it's, come on. 574 00:41:19,662 --> 00:41:20,962 If he, if Shinobi really 575 00:41:20,962 --> 00:41:22,022 had as much doom in his 576 00:41:22,022 --> 00:41:23,442 heart as he communicates, 577 00:41:24,562 --> 00:41:26,062 he would be, he would be 578 00:41:26,062 --> 00:41:28,522 in that cabin, in Uncle 579 00:41:28,522 --> 00:41:29,502 Ted's cabin, like he 580 00:41:29,502 --> 00:41:30,082 talks about. 581 00:41:30,202 --> 00:41:31,862 He would not be playing 582 00:41:31,862 --> 00:41:34,902 with Samurai swords. 583 00:41:35,562 --> 00:41:36,382 Like, maybe this is an 584 00:41:36,382 --> 00:41:38,062 opportunity of, of, there 585 00:41:38,062 --> 00:41:39,302 needs to be like a, a 586 00:41:39,302 --> 00:41:40,002 doomer re- 587 00:41:40,008 --> 00:41:46,348 have of scent that you know you could you could have a series of uncle ted's cabins where 588 00:41:46,348 --> 00:41:52,148 individuals like shinobi could get sent for some rehabilitation and they can learn how to 589 00:41:52,148 --> 00:41:58,128 chop wood with a with a good axe instead of a samurai sword and do it the right way i mean 590 00:41:58,128 --> 00:42:05,308 um one of the other developments you know we talked about this a little bit is 591 00:42:05,308 --> 00:42:14,988 the the cancel culture stuff like this social there's like one main current story and everybody's 592 00:42:14,988 --> 00:42:23,588 fighting over it and it is between you know the Cornell 7 and now we're going to do public 593 00:42:23,588 --> 00:42:30,688 executions of criminals of terrorists of doomers in the United States starting with this old 594 00:42:30,688 --> 00:42:35,808 the old terrorist guy in a wheelchair it's gonna be the first federal government 595 00:42:35,808 --> 00:42:44,048 uh death penalty execution it's gonna be the first time they use the uh firing squad in like 596 00:42:44,048 --> 00:42:50,348 i don't know since the last third turning or something um and they're the first guy's gonna 597 00:42:50,348 --> 00:42:57,248 be a palestinian um i half the country seems to think this is badass based the other half 598 00:42:57,248 --> 00:43:05,448 is clashing pearls and saying that they're, you know, aghast at the evil of society. 599 00:43:07,288 --> 00:43:13,888 What is this? This is just a new vine in the sand. It's either based or it's the most disgusting, 600 00:43:13,888 --> 00:43:20,688 vile sign of a crumbling civilization. How do you know where to stand on each of these issues? 601 00:43:20,828 --> 00:43:24,328 Because there's just going to be one after the other. There's going to be another one this week. 602 00:43:24,328 --> 00:43:27,508 you're asking how to know which side of it, 603 00:43:27,568 --> 00:43:29,828 whatever the current thing is to stand on. 604 00:43:29,948 --> 00:43:30,188 Yeah. 605 00:43:30,848 --> 00:43:34,088 Is it something you just call them on the team, 606 00:43:34,368 --> 00:43:35,068 the group chat, 607 00:43:35,068 --> 00:43:38,988 or how do you think for yourself in the culture wars? 608 00:43:39,608 --> 00:43:42,108 Well, I think it's, you know, the modern answer, 609 00:43:42,608 --> 00:43:47,188 you know, what Brad Mills or somebody like that would say 610 00:43:47,188 --> 00:43:49,948 is consult chat, GPT. 611 00:43:50,468 --> 00:43:52,408 But for me personally, 612 00:43:52,408 --> 00:44:02,468 I don't really think there's a whole lot of a reason to have much of an opinion on whatever the current thing is, such as the Cornell 7. 613 00:44:02,848 --> 00:44:10,788 I think the proper way to look at it is asking the question of how do you exploit the current thing? 614 00:44:11,328 --> 00:44:12,848 What is the great way to exploit? 615 00:44:12,848 --> 00:44:20,108 You know, this is good examples app.stream or the first public execution of a Palestinian. 616 00:44:20,108 --> 00:44:26,828 um that'll bring bring back to officer you'd be the cornell seven is 617 00:44:26,828 --> 00:44:33,968 a good way to sell peptides to girls you can be the one showing up at raping the frat house 618 00:44:33,968 --> 00:44:40,668 if you take time chain peptides and you become strong like lisa craig you could be tc you know 619 00:44:40,668 --> 00:44:48,608 let people know that there's a product available a salute dick and if it's your bitcoiner let them 620 00:44:48,608 --> 00:44:55,968 know at each step of the way, not by telling them how Bitcoin fixes this, but showing them. 621 00:44:56,828 --> 00:45:02,428 Show them how Bitcoin fixes public executions in the United States. Show them how this 622 00:45:02,428 --> 00:45:09,528 fixes monetization of rape accusations. Show them how this fixes this. 623 00:45:10,068 --> 00:45:16,288 Yeah, I think bringing the value for value model generally, you know, to executions, to, 624 00:45:16,288 --> 00:45:27,788 you know, maybe court hearings in certain circumstances that, you know, certain court proceedings are televised from time to time in high profile cases. 625 00:45:27,788 --> 00:45:43,077 And I think yeah this is a great way to bring back Noster This is a great way to you know potentially sell your your product or do that This could be the the potential this could revive start dines business model 626 00:45:43,397 --> 00:45:48,737 They could be selling servers for, uh, you know, maybe different prisons around the country 627 00:45:48,737 --> 00:45:52,357 might need to run their own Noster relay. 628 00:45:52,357 --> 00:46:01,797 there there there's a lot of ways to to exploit the situation if you're creative enough and you 629 00:46:01,797 --> 00:46:06,897 know one of the one of the easy ones is if uh if they show the the zaps and the in the live stream 630 00:46:06,897 --> 00:46:13,317 chat this is going to be a pretty i mean i i don't know is this the first time that that an execution 631 00:46:13,317 --> 00:46:15,817 has been live streamed in the United States? 632 00:46:16,417 --> 00:46:26,177 Well, it's certainly the first one done by a federal or state U.S. government. 633 00:46:26,817 --> 00:46:33,317 They live stream executions on TikTok, Facebook, Instagram, 634 00:46:33,877 --> 00:46:38,977 hacks, self-immolations, police killing, you know, 635 00:46:39,417 --> 00:46:41,837 somebody who's, you know, when they broke into a house 636 00:46:41,837 --> 00:46:47,677 or, you know, somebody in a car, executions of police by criminals 637 00:46:47,677 --> 00:46:48,497 who are getting pulled over. 638 00:46:48,617 --> 00:46:50,557 They stream like best stuff all the time, 639 00:46:50,597 --> 00:46:53,837 but this is the first time a state-sanctioned, 640 00:46:54,897 --> 00:46:59,857 democratically affirmed execution will be live-streamed. 641 00:46:59,857 --> 00:47:04,577 This is the first time we're seeing a democratically elected firing squad 642 00:47:04,577 --> 00:47:06,037 performing an execution. 643 00:47:06,037 --> 00:47:10,617 I mean, if you got, like, people are watching this live stream 644 00:47:10,617 --> 00:47:16,137 on zap.stream it's a it's a great opportunity to uh you know put some messages in the zap like 645 00:47:16,137 --> 00:47:23,597 maybe we could uh shill soap miner in there or the orange mart absolutely this is a great way to get 646 00:47:23,597 --> 00:47:31,057 to get your brand get out brand awareness when you know if there's a live stream happening of 647 00:47:31,057 --> 00:47:36,537 something that the world is watching well one of the big stories this week is uh ledger seems to 648 00:47:36,537 --> 00:47:38,717 be somewhat impacted. 649 00:47:38,717 --> 00:47:40,977 It seemed like it was a regional issue, correct? 650 00:47:40,977 --> 00:47:42,957 In a supply chain attack? 651 00:47:42,957 --> 00:47:45,717 Yeah, and it was like a Southeast Asian supplier 652 00:47:47,137 --> 00:47:52,137 and like $80 million worth of Bitcoin was compromised 653 00:47:53,357 --> 00:47:56,057 and stolen in a supply chain attack. 654 00:47:56,057 --> 00:47:58,557 Do you think that Home Depot office paper 655 00:47:58,557 --> 00:48:02,217 is at the same risk of a supply chain attack like this one? 656 00:48:02,217 --> 00:48:04,977 Could you embed malicious hardware 657 00:48:04,977 --> 00:48:07,557 inside of Office Depot paper. 658 00:48:07,557 --> 00:48:11,437 Now, this is why paper wallets are still the standard. 659 00:48:12,377 --> 00:48:14,257 Bitcoin Core and paper wallet. 660 00:48:14,257 --> 00:48:16,797 I do think there is a risk of, you know, 661 00:48:16,797 --> 00:48:18,417 maybe an attacker. 662 00:48:18,417 --> 00:48:20,057 I think the risk is pretty low 663 00:48:20,057 --> 00:48:21,917 because the majority of people 664 00:48:21,917 --> 00:48:25,377 that are buying Office Depot paper 665 00:48:26,557 --> 00:48:30,217 are not buying it to generate seed phrases on, 666 00:48:30,217 --> 00:48:32,357 or write seed phrases on. 667 00:48:32,357 --> 00:48:34,757 And so in this scenario, 668 00:48:34,757 --> 00:48:37,897 it has like a much broader surface area 669 00:48:37,897 --> 00:48:41,117 of like the unlikelihood of it happening. 670 00:48:41,117 --> 00:48:43,997 But to be safe, it's probably a good idea 671 00:48:43,997 --> 00:48:47,037 to take your paper and maybe throw it in the microwave 672 00:48:47,037 --> 00:48:49,297 for like 30 minutes, or not 30 minutes, 673 00:48:49,297 --> 00:48:52,317 but you know, 30 seconds before you, 674 00:48:52,317 --> 00:48:56,637 to potentially zap any nanoparticles that are on it 675 00:48:56,637 --> 00:49:00,377 that could lead to discovery 676 00:49:00,377 --> 00:49:02,757 by a third party of your seed phrase. 677 00:49:02,757 --> 00:49:07,477 But you can't throw a ledger device in the microwave 678 00:49:07,477 --> 00:49:09,577 for 30 seconds to do the same thing. 679 00:49:09,577 --> 00:49:11,377 Or a cold card for that matter. 680 00:49:11,377 --> 00:49:14,757 Or a bit box or a bit key. 681 00:49:14,757 --> 00:49:18,797 I don't think there's any specific purpose 682 00:49:18,797 --> 00:49:32,487 signing devices single purpose signing devices like this that you could throw in a microwave to be safe from Makes you think Did you see that Mossad denied planting explosives on the ledger devices 683 00:49:32,487 --> 00:49:33,426 that were compromised? 684 00:49:33,826 --> 00:49:34,487 I don't blame them. 685 00:49:34,726 --> 00:49:35,826 I don't blame them, but, you know, 686 00:49:36,487 --> 00:49:39,447 you have to expect that they will be suspected. 687 00:49:40,206 --> 00:49:43,126 So, Neat Creations has been at the center of the timeline. 688 00:49:43,286 --> 00:49:44,206 He's had a big week. 689 00:49:44,806 --> 00:49:47,426 What is going on for him? 690 00:49:48,626 --> 00:49:50,866 And does it have to do with Pokemon cards? 691 00:49:51,346 --> 00:49:53,806 Yeah, he's become the main character, the main pleb. 692 00:49:55,666 --> 00:50:01,626 It's really just a, some say he's lucky, some say he's not in the work, 693 00:50:02,106 --> 00:50:06,566 but he's just got a very memable face, and he's taken over. 694 00:50:06,706 --> 00:50:13,447 It's like a crash-out weekend tidal wave of neat creation slop. 695 00:50:13,447 --> 00:50:26,966 And I think it is a harbinger or a sign that anybody who thought need creation slop was going away is sadly mistaken. 696 00:50:27,626 --> 00:50:29,686 My question is, how long is he going to sustain? 697 00:50:29,926 --> 00:50:35,386 Generally, these individuals that post like this, they go one of a few ways. 698 00:50:35,466 --> 00:50:40,206 Either they flame out eventually or they join a Bitcoin treasury company. 699 00:50:40,686 --> 00:50:42,867 I don't have a prediction for this one yet, but you're right. 700 00:50:42,867 --> 00:50:52,006 It's, this is either going to, he's either going to implode or explode from the spotlight. 701 00:50:52,286 --> 00:50:54,286 I don't know if he's ready for the spotlight. 702 00:50:54,546 --> 00:51:03,546 I don't know if he's mentally prepared for the constant having to be on and being the main character in the spotlight. 703 00:51:03,546 --> 00:51:06,746 but maybe he'll surprise us 704 00:51:06,746 --> 00:51:08,046 and maybe he will 705 00:51:08,046 --> 00:51:09,586 maybe he'll be 706 00:51:09,586 --> 00:51:10,566 the new 707 00:51:10,566 --> 00:51:10,867 you know 708 00:51:10,867 --> 00:51:11,726 on the next commercial 709 00:51:11,726 --> 00:51:12,466 for strategy 710 00:51:12,466 --> 00:51:13,126 for stretch 711 00:51:13,126 --> 00:51:14,886 maybe he'll be 712 00:51:14,886 --> 00:51:16,386 adopted by the 713 00:51:16,386 --> 00:51:17,026 Seacoiners 714 00:51:17,026 --> 00:51:19,286 and turn into a brand 715 00:51:19,286 --> 00:51:20,646 or he will crash out 716 00:51:20,646 --> 00:51:21,566 maybe we need 717 00:51:21,566 --> 00:51:22,646 a prediction market for it 718 00:51:22,646 --> 00:51:23,586 maybe we'll see him 719 00:51:23,586 --> 00:51:24,226 on a panel 720 00:51:24,226 --> 00:51:25,146 at a conference 721 00:51:25,146 --> 00:51:26,726 with Fred Krueger 722 00:51:26,726 --> 00:51:27,826 be incredible 723 00:51:27,826 --> 00:51:29,466 see if he can 724 00:51:29,466 --> 00:51:30,447 he has the discipline 725 00:51:30,447 --> 00:51:31,286 to deal with 726 00:51:31,286 --> 00:51:32,007 thanks to get there 727 00:51:32,007 --> 00:51:33,126 it'll be an exciting 728 00:51:33,126 --> 00:51:35,786 and development to watch going forward. 729 00:51:35,786 --> 00:51:37,206 While we're in October, 730 00:51:37,206 --> 00:51:40,947 Bitcoin is traded sideways and down slightly. 731 00:51:40,947 --> 00:51:44,226 I think the question on everybody's mind is, 732 00:51:44,226 --> 00:51:46,867 it's not what our price predictions are, 733 00:51:46,867 --> 00:51:50,246 but where is there left to go to get price predictions? 734 00:51:50,246 --> 00:51:51,086 What channels? 735 00:51:51,086 --> 00:51:53,346 I guess, maybe? 736 00:51:53,346 --> 00:51:55,007 It's pretty much Calci. 737 00:51:55,007 --> 00:51:57,026 Everything's kind of condensed and compressed down 738 00:51:57,026 --> 00:51:59,586 to market predictions. 739 00:51:59,586 --> 00:52:02,166 So Cal G Poly market predicts, 740 00:52:03,146 --> 00:52:04,447 that's where you gotta go. 741 00:52:05,106 --> 00:52:06,026 The futures market, 742 00:52:06,766 --> 00:52:07,466 the coin futures, 743 00:52:07,586 --> 00:52:09,686 now the chain street's not manipulating them. 744 00:52:10,066 --> 00:52:10,886 That's a good signal. 745 00:52:11,926 --> 00:52:13,947 It's boring now. 746 00:52:14,086 --> 00:52:15,766 It's like nobody telling Faze, 747 00:52:16,867 --> 00:52:18,966 his price prediction gets thrown in a pot 748 00:52:18,966 --> 00:52:21,386 with Jack Mallers and Max Keiser, 749 00:52:23,486 --> 00:52:24,566 you know, Corey Clipson, 750 00:52:25,407 --> 00:52:27,486 even, you know, they even take CK. 751 00:52:28,426 --> 00:52:29,386 It's not in numbers. 752 00:52:29,386 --> 00:52:30,226 It's not a prediction. 753 00:52:30,226 --> 00:52:31,926 It's just whatever the highest one is, 754 00:52:31,926 --> 00:52:33,666 it's not bullish enough. 755 00:52:33,666 --> 00:52:35,326 They just put it all in the compute it 756 00:52:35,326 --> 00:52:37,826 and they regression. 757 00:52:37,826 --> 00:52:40,326 It's been the market decides. 758 00:52:40,326 --> 00:52:42,907 So it's not, it's this boring. 759 00:52:42,907 --> 00:52:46,046 We'll see what up to October is the volatility 760 00:52:46,046 --> 00:52:51,046 in predictions has been tampered by prediction markets. 761 00:52:52,947 --> 00:52:55,947 Is this part of the reason why 762 00:52:55,947 --> 00:52:58,947 Bitcoin podcasters are struggling so much anymore? 763 00:52:59,386 --> 00:53:03,886 Well, just the ones who aren't sponsored by the prediction markets. 764 00:53:03,886 --> 00:53:04,886 Yeah. 765 00:53:04,886 --> 00:53:08,826 I mean, if you're sponsored by a prediction market, those Bitcoin podcasters are doing 766 00:53:08,826 --> 00:53:09,826 fine. 767 00:53:09,826 --> 00:53:10,826 Those podcasters in general. 768 00:53:10,826 --> 00:53:27,036 If you don have that sponsorship you know your plug slot prediction is not going to carry the same weight Do certain prediction markets have higher standing impurity test issuance culture 769 00:53:27,496 --> 00:53:35,576 Like Polymarket maybe has some points against it for the heavy use of stable coins. 770 00:53:36,336 --> 00:53:39,896 Predix being Bitcoin native has some points for it. 771 00:53:40,136 --> 00:53:41,396 I don't know about CalSheet. 772 00:53:41,396 --> 00:53:45,736 I think they, you know, they all had their own community. 773 00:53:45,736 --> 00:53:46,976 You have the futures market. 774 00:53:46,976 --> 00:53:49,776 I was on Charles Schwab. 775 00:53:49,776 --> 00:53:49,976 Right. 776 00:53:49,976 --> 00:53:53,156 I think it's just a market for, I think all, I think the main three, 777 00:53:53,156 --> 00:54:00,776 Predix, Polymarket and Calci, you can pay through Bitcoin from one half away 778 00:54:01,916 --> 00:54:03,076 at the end of the day. 779 00:54:03,076 --> 00:54:07,916 Well, folks, I think this is wrap for this one, but as the politicians 780 00:54:07,916 --> 00:54:11,156 and the heads of industry are trying to replace you with AI, 781 00:54:11,156 --> 00:54:19,996 Just remember, it doesn't have to be one-sided, and maybe there's a future for the libertarian movement over replacing politicians with AI. 782 00:54:20,736 --> 00:54:23,196 Rod, do you have anything before we wrap this one up? 783 00:54:23,736 --> 00:54:26,736 Just don't fall to the doom or cave in. 784 00:54:27,236 --> 00:54:30,896 Folks, thank you for listening to another edition of the Beagle Weekly, and we'll catch you next week. 785 00:54:41,156 --> 00:54:56,316 The bombs are falling across the ocean 786 00:54:56,316 --> 00:55:01,356 Over here the people quit their dreams 787 00:55:01,356 --> 00:55:06,056 The broccoli hair cuts on their heads 788 00:55:06,056 --> 00:55:10,216 Their lives are lived in screams 789 00:55:10,216 --> 00:55:14,956 They don't think they can't afford the future 790 00:55:14,956 --> 00:55:19,856 Tomorrow seems too far beyond our reach 791 00:55:19,856 --> 00:55:24,696 Gambling all that they have trying to get ahead 792 00:55:24,696 --> 00:55:29,516 Where do you go in a world at war when you just want peace? 793 00:55:31,416 --> 00:55:34,416 Boomers, what did you leave for me? 794 00:55:35,936 --> 00:55:39,596 Boomers, what'd you leave behind for me? 795 00:55:40,216 --> 00:55:42,216 Yeah. 796 00:56:10,216 --> 00:56:23,076 They promised life would be good 797 00:56:23,076 --> 00:56:27,976 If we just did what we were told 798 00:56:27,976 --> 00:56:32,536 But it seems that all we will get 799 00:56:32,536 --> 00:56:37,256 Is a future without a role 800 00:56:37,256 --> 00:56:42,036 Where do we fit in a world made of code? 801 00:56:42,516 --> 00:56:46,596 Where do we fit when the world has no soul? 802 00:56:47,196 --> 00:56:51,296 Where do we fit in a world made of code? 803 00:56:52,116 --> 00:56:57,316 Where do we fit when the world has no soul? 804 00:57:07,256 --> 00:57:07,756 you