1
00:00:00,260 --> 00:00:15,720
Hey, everyone. Sean here. Welcome to Season 2 of Trust Revolution. Before we get into the episode, I wanted to let you know that I have chosen to move the primary distribution, if you will, for video and audio of the show to Fountain, Fountain.fm.

2
00:00:15,720 --> 00:00:28,240
The reason for that is I think it is in keeping with the mission of Trust Revolution to choose alternatives that are not the usual massive platforms like YouTube and the rest.

3
00:00:28,360 --> 00:00:30,880
I will still be distributing on YouTube, Substack, and others.

4
00:00:31,400 --> 00:00:38,720
But the real focus is on independent, good old RSS feed-driven distribution.

5
00:00:38,720 --> 00:00:41,220
You don't need to get into the weeds if that's not of interest to you.

6
00:00:41,280 --> 00:00:50,700
But what you can do is go to TrustRevolution.co, and that will take you to Fountain, where you can, and I recommend that you install their app.

7
00:00:50,880 --> 00:00:51,860
It is free.

8
00:00:52,080 --> 00:00:55,700
That will give you access to the audio and video of the show.

9
00:00:56,140 --> 00:01:00,220
It's an outstanding way to consume that content, to watch and listen.

10
00:01:00,220 --> 00:01:12,420
It also will give you an opportunity to support the show through a subscription or through independent purchase of episodes that you can do in Bitcoin or in your local currency of choice.

11
00:01:12,640 --> 00:01:15,180
No ads, no sponsors for Trust Revolution.

12
00:01:15,460 --> 00:01:19,820
So this is a great option if you'd like to support the show and what we're doing.

13
00:01:19,820 --> 00:01:28,460
And with that, I'll turn it over to our first episode of season two, a great conversation with Cato Institute's Nick Anthony.

14
00:01:30,220 --> 00:01:34,300
Nick Anthony, welcome. Thank you for taking the time today.

15
00:01:34,860 --> 00:01:35,940
Thank you for having me on the show.

16
00:01:36,680 --> 00:01:51,360
Absolutely. Absolutely. As we were saying before we started rolling, as it were, you and I connected on Nostr, which I feel like I have the mandatory mention, X number of mentions of Nostr for every of these episodes.

17
00:01:51,360 --> 00:01:57,520
But it has become what Twitter was for me a long time ago, which is a great place to meet super interesting people doing important work.

18
00:01:57,520 --> 00:02:16,240
And so that's how we connected. And thanks again for the time today. We'll get all this, of course, into the show notes. But I think broad strokes, Nick, you are a policy analyst at the Venerable Cato Institute and specifically the CMFA, the Center for Monetary and Financial Alternatives.

19
00:02:16,240 --> 00:02:23,860
I know you're also a fellow at the Human Rights Foundation where you lead the CBDC tracker, which we'll definitely talk about.

20
00:02:24,460 --> 00:02:28,940
And I just finished your book last week, Digital Currency or Digital Control.

21
00:02:29,540 --> 00:02:33,580
And I will again shamelessly plug because I did the audio book.

22
00:02:34,100 --> 00:02:38,240
I confess I'm a 1.7 Xer, you know, when it comes to listening speed.

23
00:02:38,380 --> 00:02:39,500
But it was great.

24
00:02:39,500 --> 00:02:49,660
And I think it was for me, I'm not an expert, but I'm fairly deep in financial services and the broader sort of matters.

25
00:02:49,960 --> 00:02:51,220
But I learned a ton.

26
00:02:51,880 --> 00:02:57,080
And I would imagine for someone new to the topic, it's going to be a great introduction.

27
00:02:57,080 --> 00:02:58,880
And I definitely want to dig in there.

28
00:02:59,340 --> 00:03:02,840
Anything I'm missing that you're working on, Nick, that we should touch on?

29
00:03:03,240 --> 00:03:04,900
I think you've covered the gambit.

30
00:03:04,960 --> 00:03:06,160
So I'll just say thank you.

31
00:03:06,200 --> 00:03:07,700
I appreciate all the kind words.

32
00:03:07,700 --> 00:03:13,640
That really does mean a lot to hear that the work is not just getting out into the world, but also being received well.

33
00:03:15,000 --> 00:03:15,920
Well, let's start here.

34
00:03:16,120 --> 00:03:22,420
So why and when did Cato Institute start the Center for Monetary and Financial Alternatives?

35
00:03:22,580 --> 00:03:27,120
What's the raison d'etre of the team, of the group, of that particular program?

36
00:03:27,680 --> 00:03:29,860
So this is an 11-year project now.

37
00:03:30,000 --> 00:03:32,540
This was kicked off in 2014.

38
00:03:33,380 --> 00:03:35,620
Cato's history stretches back to the 70s.

39
00:03:35,620 --> 00:03:48,980
But around that time, there was something tangible in the air, something that we're really feeling again now, where people realize that the Federal Reserve is something that should be questioned.

40
00:03:49,540 --> 00:03:51,100
It should be investigated.

41
00:03:51,640 --> 00:03:56,660
And this investigation should take place in a way that people can actually understand on the ground.

42
00:03:56,660 --> 00:04:26,340
And so Cato decided to bring together leading minds like George Selgin, who was the founding director, to work on this project and to get the center off the ground to start having a critical voice, not just speaking about the dangers of central banking and what other governments have done that have gone awry, but also advocating for alternatives, whether that's Bitcoin, fintech, or anything else.

43
00:04:26,660 --> 00:04:33,400
what can happen on the ground that isn't being allowed. And so it was a really crucial time

44
00:04:33,400 --> 00:04:39,580
to have this brought into the conversation still in the aftermath of the global financial crisis.

45
00:04:39,980 --> 00:04:47,420
And I think we're feeling some of those same energies in the air now with so many people

46
00:04:47,420 --> 00:04:52,400
interested in Bitcoin, interested in other cryptocurrencies, whether it's stable coins

47
00:04:52,400 --> 00:05:00,760
or otherwise, and also concerned about central bank digital currencies. So it's an ongoing history

48
00:05:00,760 --> 00:05:08,160
for us here at the center, but it's one that I'm very happy to see that people are asking questions

49
00:05:08,160 --> 00:05:14,020
like, what is money? What are central banks? Why do we have the systems that we have today?

50
00:05:14,300 --> 00:05:20,180
Instead of treating all those questions as just, this is the default. I turned on the game. These

51
00:05:20,180 --> 00:05:25,660
are the rules that were loaded in. I'll just play it to the end. Absolutely. And I think, I mean,

52
00:05:25,680 --> 00:05:32,280
that is my aspiration and hope and sort of the purpose for this podcast is, as I often say,

53
00:05:32,440 --> 00:05:38,560
is to reach those on the bubble, to reach those who are curious, who have a sense that something

54
00:05:38,560 --> 00:05:44,840
is not quite right and are looking for alternatives. Those of us who are deep down whichever rabbit

55
00:05:44,840 --> 00:05:49,680
hole it is, Bitcoin or otherwise, you know, I think we know this, we see this, we feel it. And so

56
00:05:49,680 --> 00:05:58,280
So to that point, Nick, where would you say the center is directing its message?

57
00:05:58,740 --> 00:06:01,040
And I'll break that up perhaps into two.

58
00:06:01,040 --> 00:06:09,000
There are those, I presume, who are longtime supporters, followers of Cato Institute.

59
00:06:09,540 --> 00:06:16,280
To what degree do you feel like there is an awakening among a broader audience, new personas, new segments?

60
00:06:16,600 --> 00:06:19,540
So, you know, how much of that is sort of fresh blood that you're reaching?

61
00:06:19,680 --> 00:06:20,840
Or if you have a sense.

62
00:06:21,640 --> 00:06:22,640
That is such a good question.

63
00:06:23,960 --> 00:06:31,820
I'll say it's hard to put exact numbers on it, but I think we are reaching a lot of new people.

64
00:06:31,960 --> 00:06:44,440
So a lot of people out of kind of the libertarian bubble, mostly because there's so much frustration with what the Republican Party and the Democrat Party are doing.

65
00:06:45,200 --> 00:06:48,500
People are asking, why isn't there something else?

66
00:06:48,500 --> 00:07:03,980
And here Cato has been on the ground since the 70s saying there is something else. You can look at politics differently. And so there's a lot of people, especially young people, who are looking for that alternative answer.

67
00:07:03,980 --> 00:07:22,940
And mind you, not all of them. In fact, I'd even say most of them are not coming to this as sudden converts, died in the wool, wanting to join up and either work here or be a libertarian full time and whatever that means for them.

68
00:07:22,940 --> 00:07:34,080
But they are grabbing on to specific policies and saying, OK, I might disagree with you here, but over here, there is something that we need to work on and we need to better.

69
00:07:34,080 --> 00:07:47,060
And I often joke about one of the fun things of this job is I can have Republicans yelling at me in the morning, Democrats loving me, and then by the afternoon it switches.

70
00:07:47,960 --> 00:07:53,160
And it's definitely something you have to take, you have to roll with.

71
00:07:53,980 --> 00:08:02,040
But it shows me that we are breaking through these kind of walls that people hold up that say my identity is the party.

72
00:08:02,040 --> 00:08:11,520
That should not be the way that anyone operates. There's just too much complexity in this world to have blanket statements like that.

73
00:08:11,520 --> 00:08:29,800
Absolutely. And I'd like to believe here again, the aspiration that I have, among others, is the money is so very broken that it would be hard, I imagine, and in my own conversations with individuals, friends, colleagues, otherwise, that does seem to cut through a lot of the noise.

74
00:08:29,800 --> 00:08:50,000
And so not to lead you there, but what's your sense, Nick, of the pains that, you know, whether it is Gen Z or up, what are they feeling and what do you think they're fundamentally connecting with with regard to monetary and financial alternatives, as it were?

75
00:08:51,120 --> 00:08:53,820
I think one thing they're really feeling is confusion.

76
00:08:53,820 --> 00:09:04,660
You have, especially on the younger side, people are seeing the value of the dollar vanish from their wallets through this last bout of inflation.

77
00:09:05,320 --> 00:09:09,080
People are looking to the government and seeing disorder.

78
00:09:09,960 --> 00:09:16,160
And people are also seeing news of things like central bank digital currencies and asking, why?

79
00:09:16,520 --> 00:09:17,660
Why is this happening?

80
00:09:18,140 --> 00:09:23,840
Why are they trying to create this brand new thing when what's currently in my hands isn't working?

81
00:09:24,360 --> 00:09:34,180
And so I think one of the biggest pains people feel is confusion in not knowing what's going on or understanding how the system works.

82
00:09:34,440 --> 00:09:40,060
And the silver lining of that is that they're asking questions and trying to figure it out.

83
00:09:40,060 --> 00:09:45,740
And in the process of doing so, they're seeing some of the ridiculous elements of what's going on here.

84
00:09:45,740 --> 00:10:00,520
It's not how I want any system to really work. I always say that I want people to use alternatives because they're better, because they're running to them, not because they're running away from something.

85
00:10:00,520 --> 00:10:07,520
I don't want people to be running from hyperinflation, from capital controls, from widespread surveillance.

86
00:10:08,480 --> 00:10:11,900
I want it to be something that's solely better and competition is working.

87
00:10:12,420 --> 00:10:20,740
But what we do see across the world in the United States and abroad is that people are running away when they start asking these questions.

88
00:10:21,500 --> 00:10:26,920
So it's both a glass half full and a glass half empty.

89
00:10:26,920 --> 00:10:41,760
Right, right. Well, and that's a great segue into the topic of central bank digital currencies. And so, as we noted at the top, in addition to your work with Cato, you're a fellow at Human Rights Foundation where you lead the CBDC tracker.

90
00:10:41,760 --> 00:10:57,580
Would you first please tell us what that project entails and then feel free to talk at length about how CBDCs amplify the surveillance that is already embedded in systems and laws like the Bank Secrecy Act.

91
00:10:57,640 --> 00:11:00,220
Would love to get your take there.

92
00:11:01,060 --> 00:11:04,620
Well, I'll try not to talk at length because I can talk for days about this.

93
00:11:04,820 --> 00:11:05,380
So please do –

94
00:11:05,380 --> 00:11:06,000
Well, I think it's important.

95
00:11:06,340 --> 00:11:10,600
Please do throw rocks at me if I'm going way too long or if you need to go to bed.

96
00:11:10,600 --> 00:11:20,600
So fundamentally, the Human Rights Foundation wanted to launch the CBDC tracker in about 2022.

97
00:11:20,600 --> 00:11:33,660
And we finally got it off the ground in 2023, noticing that this went from a few central banks and a handful of academics were considering this idea of issuing digital money to the public.

98
00:11:33,900 --> 00:11:37,160
But it really didn't go anywhere at first.

99
00:11:37,160 --> 00:12:00,280
It wasn't until 2019 that it skyrocketed. Like wildfire covering the brush, it all of a sudden spread across the world where central bankers, policymakers, and even some think tanks were arguing there needs to be this new invention of money, creating a direct connection between the central bank or the government at large and citizens.

100
00:12:00,280 --> 00:12:07,460
And what, Nick, was happening, what happened in 2019 that led to that spike in interest in activity?

101
00:12:07,460 --> 00:12:21,900
The fundamental thing in my eyes is the announcement of the Libra white paper from Facebook, or now Meta. And so it's about, I believe it was June or July of the summer of 2019, they introduced it.

102
00:12:21,900 --> 00:12:33,920
And you can see in interviews all across the internet where policymakers were saying this can't happen and we need to introduce something to compete with it to stomp it out.

103
00:12:34,060 --> 00:12:49,660
Because they were worried that while Bitcoin had been around for years at this point, they saw Facebook as leveraging its user base to all of a sudden create global adoption, whereas Bitcoin had not achieved that at that level.

104
00:12:49,660 --> 00:13:19,040
And so that was really the catalyst. And I really suggest people look at just the Google Trends data showing CBDC interest. And you'll see right after that summer, it spikes like crazy. It goes straight to the moon, as it were. And that's when we really realized something needed to be done. Something needed to be done to track what these central banks are doing. What is the progress? What are they looking at? How are they thinking about it?

105
00:13:19,040 --> 00:13:35,900
But then also inserting the human rights perspective on this. So whenever somebody looks at a country page in the CBDC tracker, they'll also see specific human rights and civil liberties concerns that relate to the possible issuance of a CBDC.

106
00:13:35,900 --> 00:13:51,840
So often there's many things wrong with some of these countries, but I limit it to those that like issues of surveillance or corruption so that people can get an idea of what might happen if they move forward with a CBDC.

107
00:13:51,840 --> 00:14:12,400
And as it stands, the tracker now has 139 different jurisdictions. These are ranging from autonomous regions to city states to countries to currency unions and the like. And it's across every continent now where countries are really pushing forward.

108
00:14:12,400 --> 00:14:30,100
And one just thing that can't be denied or rather is just abundantly noticeable when you just open up the page and see the map is that it's predominantly authoritarian regimes that have launched CBDCs and are moving forward.

109
00:14:30,780 --> 00:14:35,520
Seven out of the 10 countries that have launched a CBDC are autocracies.

110
00:14:35,520 --> 00:14:55,680
And unfortunately, that's really no surprise because these are the same countries that have leveraged the financial system as a tool of control to control the opposition, to block media outlets, to stop protests by freezing bank accounts and controlling funds.

111
00:14:56,160 --> 00:15:01,800
A CBDC really is what takes that type of mass control to the next level.

112
00:15:02,280 --> 00:15:03,640
Absolutely. It's a force multiplier.

113
00:15:03,640 --> 00:15:16,460
Exactly. That's a great way to put it. Because right now, the system, another way to think of it is the system might be like at an 80% danger level, and this is taking it to that 100% level.

114
00:15:16,460 --> 00:15:38,662
Yeah And when I was struck I had followed the project for some time and checked in last week at the you know it easy to everybody points to China and we talk about perhaps China and Nigeria and others but when you filter on research the map lights up And so I delighted to say

115
00:15:38,662 --> 00:15:46,062
that the United States thus far, you know, I always remain skeptical, but is not in that sort

116
00:15:46,062 --> 00:15:53,202
of column or category. But there are so many countries in the research phase. Well, from there,

117
00:15:53,242 --> 00:16:00,962
Nick, let's talk about, to your point, for those who are not familiar, how do CBDCs amplify surveillance?

118
00:16:01,202 --> 00:16:04,382
Why are they so appealing to authoritarian regimes?

119
00:16:06,142 --> 00:16:09,742
And then perhaps, you know, we'll talk about the EU, for example.

120
00:16:09,902 --> 00:16:13,242
Whether they're an authoritarian regime, maybe that's up for debate.

121
00:16:13,402 --> 00:16:18,142
But, you know, they're seen to be sensible, I think, by a lot of the populace.

122
00:16:18,142 --> 00:16:25,402
And so, you know, there's the autocracies and perhaps, you know, let's look at the EU as some middle ground.

123
00:16:26,602 --> 00:16:35,542
Well, first, let me back up just a little bit and talk about financial privacy and what financial information tells about us.

124
00:16:35,642 --> 00:16:44,202
And in fact, a little bit of homework for all of your listeners is to look at bank statements, credit card statements, debit card statements.

125
00:16:44,202 --> 00:16:53,862
And while you should be looking at the numbers to keep a balanced budget, look at the memo lines and look at what that information says about you.

126
00:16:54,342 --> 00:17:03,102
Maybe it says where you stop to fuel up your car, where you've paid tolls on your commute, where you get lunch.

127
00:17:04,022 --> 00:17:07,822
Largely mundane things that paint a picture of where you're traveling.

128
00:17:07,822 --> 00:17:15,502
Maybe it shows the causes you donate to, revealing your political affiliation, your religion, or your other beliefs.

129
00:17:16,122 --> 00:17:22,822
And maybe it shows something that you wanted to keep deeply private, maybe a medical condition.

130
00:17:23,522 --> 00:17:28,122
All of these things can be revealed by our financial information.

131
00:17:28,922 --> 00:17:32,702
And so our financial privacy is deeply important.

132
00:17:32,702 --> 00:17:41,082
And it's something that gets lost because really it's kind of buried behind bank statements where you're mostly concerned about the number.

133
00:17:41,842 --> 00:17:47,302
It's not this hot thing where you see the surveillance camera on the street staring at you.

134
00:17:47,502 --> 00:17:49,062
It's in the background.

135
00:17:49,282 --> 00:17:50,222
It's in the weeds.

136
00:17:50,962 --> 00:17:56,022
But for governments, they do recognize that this is a useful tool.

137
00:17:56,522 --> 00:17:59,782
They can track down protesters who traveled into the city.

138
00:17:59,782 --> 00:18:04,322
They can track people who might be funding the opposition group.

139
00:18:05,182 --> 00:18:14,942
And so where CBDCs take things to the next level is that currently, in most cases, a government will have to go knock on the door of your bank.

140
00:18:15,562 --> 00:18:17,502
Say, I want NICS records.

141
00:18:18,082 --> 00:18:28,002
And they'll give it to them, but they'll at least go through the compliance checks, make sure they're only getting what they're supposed to, make sure that everything is above board.

142
00:18:28,002 --> 00:18:32,902
And there'll at least be a little bit of a delay in this process.

143
00:18:33,942 --> 00:18:42,302
The problem with the CBDC, however, is we're talking about all of those records being in the hands of governments by default.

144
00:18:42,742 --> 00:18:46,062
So no more knocking on the door of the bank.

145
00:18:46,262 --> 00:18:49,102
No more air gap in between you and the government.

146
00:18:49,602 --> 00:18:51,262
Everything is there by default.

147
00:18:51,662 --> 00:18:56,322
And that also means it's not just the records that they asked for that they're getting.

148
00:18:56,322 --> 00:19:18,522
They're getting everything across the board. We're talking about trillions upon trillions of records, and that's vastly different than what we currently have. And that's a treasure trove for especially authoritarian regimes who want to figure out new ways to control their populations, because what a great data set.

149
00:19:18,522 --> 00:19:24,562
on social media, people post about what they're doing, but people lie all the time. They want to

150
00:19:24,562 --> 00:19:29,622
look cool. They want to sound like they have the amazing job. They want to be able to strut back

151
00:19:29,622 --> 00:19:34,842
into the high school reunion. But when it comes to where we put our money, those are revealed

152
00:19:34,842 --> 00:19:41,002
preferences. You're not lying about that. You might tell people on Facebook that you just spent

153
00:19:41,002 --> 00:19:46,402
two months in Cabo. But when you look at the bank statement, you're going to see, oh, yeah,

154
00:19:46,402 --> 00:19:51,202
You went down to the local pool and we're hanging out there.

155
00:19:52,082 --> 00:20:06,222
So it's deeply concerning from those grounds that it opens up that door to have mass data collection on deeply personal information that really reveals who we are at the core.

156
00:20:06,482 --> 00:20:11,542
And then with that data in hand, it opens up to issues of control.

157
00:20:12,042 --> 00:20:13,902
How do they use that data?

158
00:20:13,902 --> 00:20:37,082
And just to give you one example is probably one of the biggest concerns with CBDC control is programmability in terms of identifying certain circumstances where one example I often give is people have said central banks can allow programmability so that kids can't buy too much candy.

159
00:20:37,522 --> 00:20:39,842
Well, what is candy for adults but alcohol?

160
00:20:40,342 --> 00:20:44,642
So limiting the amount of alcohol you purchase or maybe making it more complex.

161
00:20:44,642 --> 00:20:55,262
If you've bought a parking ticket to park in a garage, then if you buy a drink, all of a sudden it's shut down onto the idea that you might be drinking and driving.

162
00:20:55,922 --> 00:20:59,722
I think a lot of people might actually like that idea.

163
00:21:00,042 --> 00:21:06,122
But then when you start carrying it forward, you realize this gets into dangerous territory quite quickly.

164
00:21:06,122 --> 00:21:10,282
If you have a particular grain agenda, why not limit beef?

165
00:21:11,242 --> 00:21:17,822
And that gets into the problem of no matter who you like in government, they are not there forever.

166
00:21:19,042 --> 00:21:25,722
If you have concerns about the other side, the other side will eventually be in power.

167
00:21:25,902 --> 00:21:29,902
And you need to ask, do you want them to have those capabilities?

168
00:21:29,902 --> 00:21:56,062
And I think, tell me if I am wrong, but I, as you were saying, and it's something I've certainly paid attention to for quite a while, and I think most of us feel this intuitively, is perhaps second to or maybe even more than healthcare information, that, broadly speaking, the data set of our transactions would be the most sensitive and would be the richest if someone wanted to turn it against us. Is that fair to say?

169
00:21:56,062 --> 00:22:21,122
I think that's absolutely right. And it's really a sad state of affairs that that needs to be yelled from the rooftops. It should be one of those things, just like you said, like our health care formation, that we know to treat privately, to maintain control over and to actively give consent where needed to allow it to be used.

170
00:22:21,122 --> 00:22:43,242
But instead, most people have no idea that any of this is going on. A few years ago here at the Cato Institute, we surveyed people across the country. I think about it was a representative sample of Americans, about 2000 people. And the vast majority of them, they said it would be unreasonable for the government to have access to their financial information.

171
00:22:43,242 --> 00:22:59,842
And yet, at the same time, the vast majority of them believed that the Fourth Amendment protected them, that they had a right to privacy. And I hate to be the one to rain on the parade, but that has not been the case for a very long time.

172
00:22:59,842 --> 00:23:07,102
Well, and then this perhaps we're working backwards toward ground truth.

173
00:23:07,782 --> 00:23:10,782
But – and again, wonderfully covered in your book, Nick.

174
00:23:11,122 --> 00:23:21,622
Talk to us a bit about the double trouble of the Bank Secrecy Act and third-party doctrine, if you would, please.

175
00:23:21,622 --> 00:23:31,522
Well, maybe to kick things off, I do have to apologize to anyone that thinks the Bank Secrecy Act has anything to do with protecting their secrecy.

176
00:23:32,522 --> 00:23:34,542
Unfortunately, it's quite the opposite.

177
00:23:34,542 --> 00:23:53,822
This is a piece of legislation from the 1970s that has been amended and updated since then, where basically financial institutions, banks, credit unions, even pawn shops and casinos are forced to act as law enforcement investigators.

178
00:23:54,282 --> 00:23:58,542
They've been deputized on behalf of the government, and they have to report certain transactions.

179
00:23:58,542 --> 00:24:17,842
Just to give you an idea, there was about 27.5 million reports filed last year. The vast majority of those, I think it was about 20 plus million of those, were filed for nothing more than a cash transaction of $10,000 or more.

180
00:24:17,842 --> 00:24:28,062
And the whole purpose of this is supposed to be finding money launderers, terrorists, other illegal activity.

181
00:24:28,482 --> 00:24:34,262
But the vast majority of this reporting is for nothing more than just people did something strange.

182
00:24:34,902 --> 00:24:37,162
They suddenly did something abnormal.

183
00:24:37,822 --> 00:24:44,582
For example, maybe you suddenly paid $2,000 to someone and you don't usually do that.

184
00:24:44,582 --> 00:24:51,922
And the problem is the banks don't see that you had a pipe burst in your basement and you needed an emergency plumber to come in.

185
00:24:52,882 --> 00:24:55,362
From their perspective, this is suspicious.

186
00:24:55,582 --> 00:24:56,522
It seems kind of weird.

187
00:24:57,222 --> 00:25:04,822
And so instead of getting fined themselves for not reporting it, they report it to the government and it goes on its way.

188
00:25:05,722 --> 00:25:11,742
Now, this regime caught a lot of attention when it first got off the ground.

189
00:25:12,602 --> 00:25:21,202
And luckily, there were groups, both bankers and even the ACLU at the time, had challenged it in court, and it made its way to the Supreme Court.

190
00:25:21,442 --> 00:25:30,522
The idea that sharing this information ran contrary to the idea that we use passwords for our financial information.

191
00:25:30,682 --> 00:25:32,802
We close the door when we meet with our banker.

192
00:25:33,042 --> 00:25:34,902
We shred our financial statements.

193
00:25:35,342 --> 00:25:38,422
Of course, we think that this is private and want to keep it secure.

194
00:25:38,422 --> 00:25:57,582
Unfortunately, the Supreme Court created what is now known as the third-party doctrine, as you mentioned, where if you share information with a third party, in this case the bank or credit union, then you can no longer expect that information to be kept private.

195
00:25:57,582 --> 00:26:21,302
And with that single blow, the Fourth Amendment fell apart severely. All of a sudden, that those concerns or those beliefs that people have today that the Fourth Amendment protects their information was unraveled because the courts decided that, no, it doesn't apply here anymore. People can't have a reasonable expectation of privacy.

196
00:26:21,302 --> 00:26:42,522
And this has created a huge regime. It spread to other countries as well, where we see similar reporting requirements, all in the name of fighting, to be fair, bad things like terrorism. And yet, when we look at the results, it's just not getting there.

197
00:26:42,522 --> 00:27:04,142
I've been following this for years. My colleagues have been following it for even longer. And the agency in charge of maintaining this, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, or FinCEN, has really struggled to prove that this is something that's actually stopping crime.

198
00:27:04,142 --> 00:27:16,182
We finally got some numbers on this in the past few years where they say about 13% of IRS criminal cases start with a Bank Secrecy Act report.

199
00:27:16,602 --> 00:27:25,042
But if we think about that in context, 13% is roughly equal to just shy of 400 reports.

200
00:27:25,562 --> 00:27:32,702
So that means 27.5 million reports were filed.

201
00:27:32,702 --> 00:27:47,202
Banks spent upwards of $60 billion filing that in terms of compliance, and yet the IRS was only able to initiate about 400 investigations off of that.

202
00:27:48,342 --> 00:27:50,742
That is a sad state of affairs.

203
00:27:50,742 --> 00:27:55,462
over. Pardon me. I think I did the math. I should have made a note, but I think we're talking over

204
00:27:55,462 --> 00:28:02,842
$150 million per investigation initiated. I mean, and it is a testament, Nick, to

205
00:28:02,842 --> 00:28:10,522
your control and polish to say basically that the results are dubious. The results are horrible.

206
00:28:11,562 --> 00:28:17,042
And I think, you know, and you went exactly to my next question, which is, and I would recommend

207
00:28:17,042 --> 00:28:24,522
everyone read this piece, reporting FinCEN's suspicious activity again. And I think,

208
00:28:24,762 --> 00:28:32,822
tell me otherwise, but the takeaway, the major takeaway is the, I think I misspoke on Noster and

209
00:28:32,822 --> 00:28:40,142
said tax dollars, but I should have said our bank fees, you know, a lot of that $60 billion

210
00:28:40,142 --> 00:28:50,042
dollars undoubtedly is being reflected in our charges and bank fees to generate incredibly

211
00:28:50,042 --> 00:28:52,202
questionable results.

212
00:28:52,542 --> 00:29:01,082
And I don't know if you would have any visibility to of those 370 reports or investigations rather

213
00:29:01,082 --> 00:29:06,722
initiated how many resulted in penalties or arrests.

214
00:29:07,342 --> 00:29:08,662
Any insights there?

215
00:29:08,662 --> 00:29:11,042
I've been asking that question for years.

216
00:29:11,422 --> 00:29:11,962
I bet you have.

217
00:29:11,962 --> 00:29:37,262
Sadly, no. But that is, I mean, that's the $59 billion question is how many of these are starting an investigation? So we at least got that. How many are resulting in an actual court case where somebody was arrested? And how many are resulting in convictions? And it really doesn't look good, at least in terms of the IRS side.

218
00:29:37,262 --> 00:29:55,322
One thing I'll quickly add, though, is it's not just the bank fees. It's also in terms of the debanking phenomenon that people have seen. It's people being denied access because they seem too risky and banks don't want to invest in this.

219
00:29:55,322 --> 00:30:16,382
Unfortunately, this is me coming at it as a cold-hearted economist, but I see people get upset with how the financial system isn't fair because some billionaire had a bunch of currency transaction reports or other Bank Secrecy Act reports filed on them, and they were able to keep their account.

220
00:30:16,382 --> 00:30:24,202
but maybe a small business had their account shut down. And unfortunately, the cold math of it

221
00:30:24,202 --> 00:30:29,602
is that banks can afford to do it. When you're rich and you're bringing in tons of money,

222
00:30:30,002 --> 00:30:36,082
they can turn a blind eye on the cost of compliance. But when you're a normal person

223
00:30:36,082 --> 00:30:42,622
or an average person, those compliance costs stack up and eventually push comes to shove.

224
00:30:42,622 --> 00:31:01,943
And they say we don want to do business with you anymore because it not viable Or if it somebody who is on the lower end of the income spectrum and they see that maybe they don have a formal job and it looks like they might have issues with having to file these reports they say it not worth opening the account

225
00:31:02,903 --> 00:31:09,183
And that's such a backward state of affairs that we're not catching criminals,

226
00:31:09,743 --> 00:31:19,403
and instead we're penalizing everyday people in terms of both the effects to their wallets and also to their civil liberties.

227
00:31:19,403 --> 00:31:20,403
Absolutely.

228
00:31:21,003 --> 00:31:23,203
It's just wrong from start to finish.

229
00:31:23,203 --> 00:31:37,483
And I think, you know, that is along with 2 percent inflation is good and taxes, you know, there are all these indoctrinated myths or indoctrinations that we come up with.

230
00:31:37,483 --> 00:31:51,323
And I know many people believe in earnest that these regulations, these laws, these entire regimes to say nothing of the Financial Action Task Force, if you have thoughts there, by all means.

231
00:31:51,323 --> 00:32:01,363
I know, you know, we exchanged a bit about my previous interview with Open State, the pseudonymous civil servant who is inside one of these regulatory regimes.

232
00:32:02,463 --> 00:32:17,783
It is remarkable the degree to which they are demonstrably ineffective or, you know, to be a bit more generous that they have failed to produce data or findings that would demonstrate that they are effective.

233
00:32:17,783 --> 00:32:34,003
And to that end, I'm thinking about Open State's remark that in order to repeal the Bank Secrecy Act, that as he put it, I believe the United States, for example, would have to settle its account with FATF.

234
00:32:34,423 --> 00:32:46,583
Any insights on the viability, any initiatives to amend, to repeal, to rein in the Bank Secrecy Act or related, Nick?

235
00:32:46,583 --> 00:32:57,503
There are quite a few initiatives underway right now, and Open State's right that it's complicated, especially when you get into the international side of it.

236
00:32:57,503 --> 00:33:19,543
In terms of what Congress is doing, right now, I believe Senator Mike Lee out of Utah and also Representative John Rose out of Tennessee in both the House and Senate have legislation that has been introduced both last Congress and this Congress to dramatically reform the Bank Secrecy Act.

237
00:33:19,543 --> 00:33:30,503
It's not a full repeal, but the general approach that both of them take is that this regime can be separated into kind of two buckets.

238
00:33:31,543 --> 00:33:36,643
So on one side, you have the record keeping requirements.

239
00:33:37,603 --> 00:33:44,323
Financial institutions need to keep X, Y, and Z on their customers and keep those records for a certain amount of years.

240
00:33:44,323 --> 00:33:49,863
And then on the other side, you have they need to report customers in certain circumstances.

241
00:33:49,863 --> 00:33:53,663
So those are the currency transaction reports, the suspicious activity reports.

242
00:33:53,663 --> 00:33:54,903
Activity, SARS, right.

243
00:33:55,283 --> 00:33:55,423
Yep.

244
00:33:56,483 --> 00:34:00,963
What their legislation does is gets rid of the reporting side.

245
00:34:01,383 --> 00:34:10,923
So no longer will financial institutions be reporting their customers, but they'll still be keeping kind of a standardized record-keeping system.

246
00:34:10,923 --> 00:34:24,943
And they've gone that route to try to thread the needle on making something that is politically feasible while also having a dramatic reform in terms of how it works on the ground.

247
00:34:24,943 --> 00:34:50,363
And that's really exciting, though, because this is something that's been going on for over 50 years now. And this is probably the biggest challenge that has been introduced in Congress in a very long time. And it has a chance to get somewhere. But it's also really exciting because we're actually having this conversation in the first place.

248
00:34:50,363 --> 00:34:52,823
And it's something that Americans on the ground.

249
00:34:53,343 --> 00:34:53,423
Yeah.

250
00:34:53,523 --> 00:34:53,683
Right.

251
00:34:54,043 --> 00:34:56,723
Americans on the ground are noticing this more and more.

252
00:34:56,943 --> 00:34:58,123
It really kicked off.

253
00:34:58,763 --> 00:34:59,243
It's funny.

254
00:34:59,423 --> 00:35:04,663
We talked about CBDC is kicking off with the Lieber conversation and kind of the inverse.

255
00:35:05,843 --> 00:35:13,663
Financial privacy has become more into common focus after the Biden administration proposed surveilling accounts at six hundred dollars.

256
00:35:14,683 --> 00:35:15,023
Absolutely.

257
00:35:15,623 --> 00:35:16,123
Absolutely.

258
00:35:16,123 --> 00:35:40,463
Absolutely. And it's well, and I think I take your point that certainly that's progress. And if I understand then, Nick, what would happen, as many would say, is rather than financial institutions, as you put it, being deputized into this extra legal, extra judicial enforcement arm, law enforcement would have to go fish.

259
00:35:40,463 --> 00:35:54,403
They would have to go to the institution, request records now. One could probably argue that that's trivial and the banks will just turn them over wholesale. But at least there is that extra step, that extra friction. Do you feel like that's a fair characterization?

260
00:35:54,403 --> 00:36:13,863
Yeah, there's one other side of it, though, because that is a really good point. And that's there also needs to be a strengthening. And I'm sorry, I can't recall exactly now if it's in both pieces of legislation. But there needs to be a strengthening of what's called the Right to Financial Privacy Act.

261
00:36:13,863 --> 00:36:27,903
This was a piece of legislation from 1978. Very briefly, as the name suggests, it was supposed to establish a right to financial privacy, and it was born out of concerns of the third-party doctrine in the Bank Secrecy Act.

262
00:36:28,703 --> 00:36:34,463
Congress stepped in and said, maybe this will get out of hand. How do we kind of set some guardrails on this?

263
00:36:34,463 --> 00:36:49,003
And so they said, to get financial information, the government needs to get a warrant. This is great. That's perfect. Well, the problem was, at the very end, they include a list of exceptions.

264
00:36:49,803 --> 00:37:01,703
There's more than 20 exceptions that are for things like the Bank Secrecy Act or for the IRS or for if there's a national emergency or maybe if someone's in danger.

265
00:37:02,063 --> 00:37:09,863
There's all these exceptions provided that basically boil down to all the reasons that the government would want your financial information.

266
00:37:09,863 --> 00:37:25,283
And so what Congress needs to do as well is not just at the very least get rid of the reporting side, but also strengthen the Right to Financial Privacy Act so that a warrant is required across the board.

267
00:37:25,483 --> 00:37:28,483
So that if they want the information, that's fine.

268
00:37:29,063 --> 00:37:37,343
Just do an investigation, prove that it's useful, go to a judge, substantiate it, get the warrant, then go get it.

269
00:37:37,343 --> 00:37:44,523
That's how we balance the rights of citizens with the investigations conducted by law enforcement.

270
00:37:44,523 --> 00:37:52,843
The Fourth Amendment struck a very clean balance on that, and that's what we need to restore here because otherwise you're absolutely right.

271
00:37:52,843 --> 00:37:59,243
There are going to be cases where law enforcement just walks in and says, hey, we really need this.

272
00:37:59,863 --> 00:38:10,463
We'd hate to have to look into you deeper or to tell your financial regulator that they should be checking up on you because you're uncooperative, something we've seen in the past.

273
00:38:10,463 --> 00:38:22,003
So there needs to be quite a few reforms done. It's all within reason, though. It can be achieved. It's just a matter of creating the momentum to achieve it.

274
00:38:22,003 --> 00:38:38,603
And I think, you know, that is – I take heart in this sort of broader conversation that regrettably it is because of egregious violations of individuals' rights and liberties, but that the average individual, so-called, I think, is seeing more of this.

275
00:38:38,603 --> 00:38:52,783
They're interacting more with financial institutions, which will nebulously decline because, oh, by the way, they're forbidden by law from disclosing to you why they've closed your account or why they've submitted a SAR if they have.

276
00:38:53,703 --> 00:38:55,283
Well, let me ask you this then, Nick.

277
00:38:56,343 --> 00:39:07,643
Given everything we've discussed and given the data to back it up, this is not just a couple of libertarians ranting about the desire to see smaller government, though let us not leave that aside.

278
00:39:08,603 --> 00:39:22,243
Who is advocating and why for the continued application of regimes, regulatory regimes, which are by any reasonable measure ineffective?

279
00:39:22,763 --> 00:39:26,923
Who wants this to continue and what are their incentives in your view?

280
00:39:27,623 --> 00:39:32,743
All right. So let me split this in two groups, although they're very closely connected.

281
00:39:33,223 --> 00:39:36,803
The first one is maybe the most obvious, and that's law enforcement.

282
00:39:37,623 --> 00:39:43,303
Since the beginning, law enforcement has been arguing in favor of expanding this regime.

283
00:39:43,703 --> 00:39:45,203
And I don't blame them.

284
00:39:45,363 --> 00:39:50,163
Again, looking at this as a cold-hearted economist, I see the incentives.

285
00:39:50,923 --> 00:39:54,943
They want as much information as they could possibly have.

286
00:39:54,943 --> 00:40:00,463
In fact, there have been times where they've come out and said, getting a warrant is too hard.

287
00:40:00,883 --> 00:40:01,943
It takes too much time.

288
00:40:02,603 --> 00:40:03,543
They don't want to do it.

289
00:40:04,123 --> 00:40:06,643
And I'm not really sympathetic to that.

290
00:40:06,803 --> 00:40:12,543
But I do understand the incentives that they face and why they want to do that.

291
00:40:12,543 --> 00:40:16,103
They want to have access to everything so they can act faster.

292
00:40:17,023 --> 00:40:22,943
From my viewpoint, the Fourth Amendment, again, was put in place for a reason.

293
00:40:23,463 --> 00:40:30,763
The founders saw what general access could do, whether it was in England or in the colonies,

294
00:40:30,763 --> 00:40:38,143
where people would come in and just tear houses apart and look for anything that might incriminate someone.

295
00:40:38,143 --> 00:40:43,483
They saw how government abuse could take place, especially with an aggressive government.

296
00:40:44,123 --> 00:40:46,303
So that's one side of it.

297
00:40:46,863 --> 00:40:53,403
The other side is closely connected, but it comes at it from a slightly different lens,

298
00:40:53,403 --> 00:41:00,963
where I mentioned before that there's this $59 billion of compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act.

299
00:41:01,503 --> 00:41:07,743
Well, there's also a regime that is getting – or sorry, not a regime, an industry that is getting that money.

300
00:41:08,823 --> 00:41:11,263
There's people who are taking certification courses.

301
00:41:11,663 --> 00:41:12,963
They're going to conferences.

302
00:41:13,263 --> 00:41:14,243
They're selling books.

303
00:41:14,503 --> 00:41:21,183
They're selling training manuals and study guides and an entire workforce that is behind this.

304
00:41:21,183 --> 00:41:37,763
I mean, one example of how almost cronyist this is or entrenched this is is a lot of times when banks get fined for Bank Secrecy Act violations, it's because they don't have enough employees to work on the compliance team.

305
00:41:38,943 --> 00:41:46,183
And so you have a lot of people here who, again, I think come from it with good intentions.

306
00:41:47,263 --> 00:41:47,343
Absolutely.

307
00:41:47,563 --> 00:41:47,983
Many of them.

308
00:41:48,083 --> 00:41:49,563
I worked alongside many of them.

309
00:41:49,563 --> 00:42:02,583
And a lot of times it's former law enforcement or former military and they see this as, I can continue to fight terrorists, cartels, and worse by working within the bank.

310
00:42:03,103 --> 00:42:12,443
And I'd even give them more of the benefit of the doubt than the law enforcement side of it because they also don't see where this goes.

311
00:42:12,443 --> 00:42:19,523
So they're left to assume only the good of I caught this suspicious activity and I flagged it to the powers of being.

312
00:42:19,523 --> 00:42:21,363
Dispatched the report and that's all I know.

313
00:42:21,903 --> 00:42:24,003
And that was a good day.

314
00:42:24,663 --> 00:42:24,883
Right.

315
00:42:24,883 --> 00:42:35,443
I think we're seeing more folks like Open State and others who are starting to notice that something is a little awry here.

316
00:42:35,443 --> 00:42:49,823
They're noticing that, especially with the broader financial privacy conversation, that people don't really want this to be the norm. They don't want this to be the default system.

317
00:42:49,823 --> 00:43:06,503
And so there's a few people who are speaking out. But again, the incentives are much more in the favor of those who have built careers off of this or who benefit solely off of having this mass information collection.

318
00:43:06,503 --> 00:43:17,283
Right. And that makes good sense. Either make my job easier or let me keep my job because this is what I've been doing for all of my career or a significant portion of it.

319
00:43:17,283 --> 00:43:31,983
If we – I'm thinking about those, Nick, who may be more on the progressive left-leaning side who will not perhaps respond to our previous – my previous remarks about libertarian perspectives.

320
00:43:31,983 --> 00:43:54,083
But all kidding aside, I mean, what is your message – not to say that you need to be the voice to this – but what is your message to those who are left-leaning, those who do for good and earnest reasons want to see these regimes do what they claim to do?

321
00:43:54,083 --> 00:44:10,143
I definitely sympathize with people who, regardless of the political spectrum, who want to see this be successful because ultimately they're saying nothing more than they want the bad guys to get caught.

322
00:44:10,903 --> 00:44:12,063
And I agree with that.

323
00:44:12,643 --> 00:44:21,763
I want people who are violating the rights of others, who are hurting other people, who are causing destruction to this world to be stopped.

324
00:44:21,763 --> 00:44:33,543
If I'm going to frame it, though, specifically within the progressive side, I think there's two things that I would suggest to people to look at.

325
00:44:33,683 --> 00:44:39,143
And the first one is what we've already talked about in terms of whether or not it's actually doing that.

326
00:44:39,843 --> 00:44:48,323
So whether or not this is actually stopping the bad guys is important because then we need to look at the costs.

327
00:44:48,323 --> 00:45:05,923
And it's not just – although Republicans often get the most airtime for saying tracking guns or tracking other things that are typically considered Republican values, it's also tracking people who are donating to social causes.

328
00:45:05,923 --> 00:45:18,043
Whether that's Black Lives Matter, whether that's a homeless shelter or something else, it's also tracking those as well.

329
00:45:18,223 --> 00:45:20,883
And people get caught up in this just as much.

330
00:45:20,883 --> 00:45:40,203
A few years ago, which now actually almost feels like a lifetime ago, when the Capitol riots, insurrection or protests happened, one of the things that happened after that was the FBI asked Bank of America for financial data on people who were around there.

331
00:45:40,203 --> 00:45:59,203
And I was so frustrated with this because they kept reporting in the media that they were asking for things like memos, bankline memos that involved the words Trump, Cabela's, Bible, and things that were like associated with right-leaning values.

332
00:45:59,203 --> 00:46:07,163
values. But what they didn't mention as much is in the same list of flagged items were left-leaning

333
00:46:07,163 --> 00:46:13,363
politicians like Nancy Pelosi were of concern. And so they were also looking at Democrats who

334
00:46:13,363 --> 00:46:35,005
were in the area And that was something that was really missing from the story And I don think anyone on either side should be having their privacy violated like that where they tracked whether you going to a church or a mosque whether you going to a health clinic a homeless shelter

335
00:46:35,005 --> 00:46:35,925
Or a protest.

336
00:46:35,925 --> 00:46:37,125
Or a protest.

337
00:46:37,685 --> 00:46:40,025
It just shouldn't be that way.

338
00:46:40,025 --> 00:46:51,425
And the last thing I would say is the tools that are built here in the United States have ricochets across the world, have ripples across the world.

339
00:46:51,685 --> 00:46:59,065
The tools that are built here, even if they're not abused, become quickly abused in authoritarian regimes.

340
00:46:59,505 --> 00:47:02,425
And sadly, we've seen that story too many times.

341
00:47:03,225 --> 00:47:06,805
I'll paraphrase poorly, but any tool is a weapon if you hold it right.

342
00:47:07,705 --> 00:47:08,185
Sadly.

343
00:47:08,725 --> 00:47:10,365
That's a good thing to keep in mind.

344
00:47:11,605 --> 00:47:25,705
And if I recall, and you may have touched on this in one of your pieces or I perhaps read it elsewhere, is that most recently, and just to sort of wrap up on this note, the Bondi DOJ was requesting financial transactions within a certain range of the border.

345
00:47:25,705 --> 00:47:33,045
I know Border and Customs has this 100-mile moat, which is a whole other conversation.

346
00:47:33,045 --> 00:47:37,205
But if I understood transactions as small as $200.

347
00:47:38,465 --> 00:47:38,545
Yeah.

348
00:47:38,705 --> 00:47:40,465
Well, it's even worse than that, frankly.

349
00:47:41,345 --> 00:47:47,245
So this was a kind of amendment to the currency transaction report.

350
00:47:47,565 --> 00:47:54,425
So that $10,000 report we were talking about, they decided that they wanted to take a closer look at the border.

351
00:47:54,425 --> 00:48:05,685
And so in 30 zip codes in Texas and California, the requirement was dropped from $10,000 to $200 at money service businesses.

352
00:48:06,045 --> 00:48:09,505
So this is like Western Union or RIA transfer trying to send a run.

353
00:48:09,685 --> 00:48:10,945
Right, right.

354
00:48:11,345 --> 00:48:14,885
And I was almost in shock.

355
00:48:15,405 --> 00:48:17,785
I thought this must be a typo.

356
00:48:18,525 --> 00:48:20,625
Something can't be right here.

357
00:48:20,625 --> 00:48:32,305
And yet this is exactly what was put forth where they were specifically targeting people living along the border, trying to find people with relationships across the border.

358
00:48:32,465 --> 00:48:41,905
They framed it as they're doing this where they're targeting terrorists and which are rather they're targeting cartels, which they recently named as terrorists.

359
00:48:42,645 --> 00:48:51,185
And I look at this, though, and all I can see is all the businesses that are not going to be able to stay above water because of it.

360
00:48:51,585 --> 00:48:54,205
And eventually, that's exactly what they said.

361
00:48:54,205 --> 00:49:12,765
Some of the businesses operating there spoke to the press about it and said, we're either going to have to shut down or move because what was filing, say, seven reports in a week was going to become 20,000, 30,000, 40,000 reports in a week.

362
00:49:12,845 --> 00:49:14,745
And they don't have the staff to do that.

363
00:49:15,445 --> 00:49:15,965
Nor is it.

364
00:49:16,085 --> 00:49:16,325
Yeah.

365
00:49:16,465 --> 00:49:16,685
Yeah.

366
00:49:16,805 --> 00:49:17,245
Well, anyway.

367
00:49:17,845 --> 00:49:18,785
I'm not.

368
00:49:18,865 --> 00:49:19,565
I just have to stress.

369
00:49:19,645 --> 00:49:21,525
I'm not exaggerating with those numbers.

370
00:49:21,525 --> 00:49:29,805
That is exactly how they estimated it would increase. And that is a crime in and of itself.

371
00:49:30,945 --> 00:49:37,585
Luckily, the folks at the Institute for Justice stepped in here. They challenged it and got

372
00:49:37,585 --> 00:49:43,665
together with other groups, challenged it in both states. And the regime has been frozen right now

373
00:49:43,665 --> 00:49:50,425
until they figure out exactly what's going on. And luckily, on top of that, one of the cases,

374
00:49:50,425 --> 00:49:58,425
the judge has already said, this is absurd. This cannot move forward. And so hopefully it'll be

375
00:49:58,425 --> 00:50:04,765
shut down before any of those reports actually have to be filed. But it's a perfect example of

376
00:50:04,765 --> 00:50:11,725
the Biden administration tried to levy a surveillance regime at $600 in our bank accounts.

377
00:50:11,725 --> 00:50:18,845
And now the Trump administration is trying to levy a surveillance regime at $200 transactions.

378
00:50:18,845 --> 00:50:32,205
They have some fine lines between the two, but in the end, it really shows that no matter who's in power, there are problems at hand and abuse can quickly unfold.

379
00:50:32,565 --> 00:50:38,645
And it's why we need to limit the powers of government so that these abuses do not take place.

380
00:50:39,105 --> 00:50:44,705
There might be one angel that rises to power, but they're never guaranteed to be there forever.

381
00:50:45,665 --> 00:50:45,965
Well said.

382
00:50:46,145 --> 00:50:46,525
Well said.

383
00:50:46,565 --> 00:50:58,285
And I think that is absolutely what I wish to underscore is that regardless of where you are on any political spectrum, regardless of who's in power, this is dangerous.

384
00:50:59,505 --> 00:51:03,445
And I'd love to shift, Nick, to then what can we do?

385
00:51:03,445 --> 00:51:08,885
And so in your book, you talk broadly about the risks of digital money controlled by governments.

386
00:51:09,005 --> 00:51:14,505
And I think you set a nice backdrop to eventually land on CBDCs.

387
00:51:14,705 --> 00:51:25,685
Whether it is Bitcoin, I know the Cato Institute proper maybe has some varying views and you can speak in an official or unofficial capacity.

388
00:51:25,685 --> 00:51:38,105
But whether it's Bitcoin or otherwise, what can individuals do to rebalance that power, to reclaim a bit of privacy for themselves?

389
00:51:38,665 --> 00:51:45,165
And perhaps how can they become part of a bigger voice, a louder voice to change the tide?

390
00:51:46,265 --> 00:51:52,845
Well, the first step really to that is, frankly, exactly what you're doing right now in having these conversations.

391
00:51:52,845 --> 00:51:55,105
So I very much thank you for that again.

392
00:51:55,685 --> 00:51:56,085
I appreciate that.

393
00:51:56,625 --> 00:51:57,945
It's really important.

394
00:51:58,045 --> 00:52:03,565
I can't underscore it enough, though, that having conversations about this is so important.

395
00:52:03,565 --> 00:52:07,625
Like I mentioned earlier, when here at the Cato Institute, we surveyed the public.

396
00:52:08,305 --> 00:52:13,665
Most people believe the Fourth Amendment protects their financial activity, and that's not true.

397
00:52:14,405 --> 00:52:23,445
So having conversations and raising awareness around this is the first step into making sure people know there is something worth fighting.

398
00:52:23,445 --> 00:52:30,625
Something worth fighting against. Because if they don't know, then it's just going to happen without our set.

399
00:52:31,465 --> 00:52:37,605
The next step, though, I think is then understanding what the alternatives are.

400
00:52:37,605 --> 00:53:00,645
So things like Bitcoin and even going deeper with what Calais is building with eCash, what Lea Petrasova is building with Vexel, or even further outside of the currency space in what Naomi Brockwell has built with NBTV to raise awareness on privacy generally.

401
00:53:00,645 --> 00:53:11,305
Raising awareness about these alternatives is really important because it's so much harder to embrace alternatives when your freedoms have been taken away.

402
00:53:11,685 --> 00:53:17,525
It's so much harder to build those platforms when your freedoms have been taken away.

403
00:53:17,925 --> 00:53:23,245
When we can't even have this conversation, it doesn't happen.

404
00:53:23,525 --> 00:53:24,005
It's too late.

405
00:53:24,005 --> 00:53:29,985
And so right now, it's hard because for a lot of people, the system works.

406
00:53:30,645 --> 00:53:36,065
They tap their card, they tap their phone, they pull out cash and coins, and it's seamless.

407
00:53:36,885 --> 00:53:37,705
It works.

408
00:53:37,985 --> 00:53:40,465
They don't really need to think about the alternatives.

409
00:53:40,465 --> 00:53:44,645
Why do I need to learn how to use a hot wallet versus a cold wallet?

410
00:53:44,925 --> 00:53:47,225
Why do I need to learn what hashing is?

411
00:53:48,005 --> 00:53:51,425
But right now is the time to learn it.

412
00:53:51,665 --> 00:53:58,885
And it is the time to spread it to others and teach them so that we have those escape hatches at the ready.

413
00:53:58,885 --> 00:54:07,845
We have those bunkers at the ready. Nobody wants to be building a blast bunker while you see the mushroom cloud going off.

414
00:54:08,325 --> 00:54:18,205
And I hate to be that extreme, but it really is the core of this because, again, otherwise you end up wishing you had after the fact.

415
00:54:19,145 --> 00:54:26,985
And so the third thing aside from that, so the first is to raise awareness about just the state of affairs right now.

416
00:54:26,985 --> 00:54:33,465
The second is to understand, use and embrace alternatives, whether you need them or not.

417
00:54:33,965 --> 00:54:40,225
And then the third thing is to just keep a close eye on what your government is doing.

418
00:54:40,765 --> 00:54:49,125
Because at the Human Rights Foundation, we try to track what everyone is doing across right now, 139 jurisdictions.

419
00:54:49,125 --> 00:54:52,305
So there's many sleepless nights behind the tracker.

420
00:54:52,305 --> 00:54:52,945
No doubt.

421
00:54:52,945 --> 00:55:10,685
But there's nothing more valuable than people in the – or on the ground, on the street, being the person on the spot, as Hayek would say, to understand what's going on and to make sure that our leaders are being held accountable by making their voices heard about what they do and don't want.

422
00:55:11,045 --> 00:55:13,605
That's how we create a different future.

423
00:55:13,605 --> 00:55:22,705
And that's how we get off of this path that we've been on with the past 50 years or really more than that of ever-expanding surveillance.

424
00:55:22,945 --> 00:55:43,425
Thank you for that. And I would love to follow up just a bit. Correct me if I'm wrong, Cato's work, your work is predominantly focused at the federal level, the national level. Any insights on what individuals can do at the state or local level, understanding that these regimes are almost without exception federal?

425
00:55:43,425 --> 00:56:04,965
So it's really tricky at the state level. I've done a little bit of work on this area, mostly because I get that question all the time is the state level is the level at which you can make change from the ground up. But it's hard because this is a federal regime that kind of umbrellas around that.

426
00:56:04,965 --> 00:56:25,985
For the CBDC side of things, I think one thing that has struck a good balance in terms of approaching it is making it so that there's legislation in place that prohibits the state government from using a CBDC in terms of spending, taxation, or otherwise.

427
00:56:25,985 --> 00:56:31,405
And that's a way that you're not restricting the rights of citizens.

428
00:56:31,985 --> 00:56:42,185
You're also not running afoul of the federal level, but you're also planting in the ground that the state is objecting to this.

429
00:56:42,185 --> 00:56:44,245
The state is protesting this.

430
00:56:44,905 --> 00:56:48,305
And I think that's a good approach to it.

431
00:56:49,165 --> 00:56:51,645
You're diminishing utility in a way, right?

432
00:56:51,725 --> 00:56:58,385
You're saying, look, the feds may implement this, but at the state level, the utility will be greatly diminished.

433
00:56:58,825 --> 00:56:59,265
Exactly.

434
00:56:59,265 --> 00:57:10,165
And it's tough because I know a lot of great state organizations want to go in guns blazing because this has become such a concerning topic.

435
00:57:10,465 --> 00:57:18,045
But we also have to balance it to make sure that we're not creating unintended consequences by doing that as well.

436
00:57:18,305 --> 00:57:20,545
Patchwork quilt of state legislation.

437
00:57:20,545 --> 00:57:28,945
Unfortunately, the nuclear option is not a very good option and it's not a good option across the board in any circumstance.

438
00:57:30,265 --> 00:57:30,785
Fair, fair.

439
00:57:31,925 --> 00:57:40,345
Well, as we wrap up, Nick, what will we look forward to from the center or perhaps from you over the coming months?

440
00:57:40,485 --> 00:57:42,845
What are sort of areas of focus for your work?

441
00:57:43,405 --> 00:57:45,945
Oh, gosh, there's quite a few.

442
00:57:46,565 --> 00:57:53,225
One thing right off the bat is we've been rolling out a new series on reforming the Federal Reserve.

443
00:57:53,225 --> 00:57:59,985
So it's tackling one paper per subject area of what the Federal Reserve does.

444
00:58:00,145 --> 00:58:01,125
The audit's coming, right?

445
00:58:01,265 --> 00:58:01,525
Yes.

446
00:58:01,785 --> 00:58:04,585
So that's one of the things in there.

447
00:58:04,965 --> 00:58:09,465
I just put out a paper on this specifically in terms of the payment system.

448
00:58:09,465 --> 00:58:24,025
So how the Fed is involved in terms of clearing and settlement and showing how it's, over time, pulled that out of the private sector and taken over it and how we return it to the private sector.

449
00:58:24,745 --> 00:58:33,705
Another thing that is unfortunately always coming out is updates to the CBDC tracker because there are constantly things going on.

450
00:58:33,705 --> 00:58:45,545
And I just made updates to Belarus, Iran, India, Nigeria, Kenya, and the Eurozone in the past two weeks.

451
00:58:47,185 --> 00:58:56,165
Would you say – perhaps difficult to measure quantitatively or qualitatively – would you say interest is accelerating?

452
00:58:56,445 --> 00:59:00,845
How would you characterize the trajectory of CBDCs globally?

453
00:59:00,845 --> 00:59:13,025
I think that's a tough question because I think activity is accelerating, but interest is waning.

454
00:59:13,025 --> 00:59:30,185
And I say that because you have a lot of jurisdictions that got to the pilot phase in what was kind of a CBDC rush of sorts leading from 2019 to 2022.

455
00:59:30,845 --> 00:59:39,805
But in 2022, around right when we launched the tracker, global concern really erupted.

456
00:59:40,505 --> 00:59:44,645
You had more people speaking out, more people voicing their concerns.

457
00:59:44,645 --> 00:59:58,705
And so there's been a sharp decrease in sentiment and a sharp decrease in almost excitement among central bankers because so many people are so worried about this.

458
00:59:58,705 --> 01:00:07,405
And so while they're still working on it, it doesn't have quite the glitz and glamour that it once had.

459
01:00:08,405 --> 01:00:09,645
And I very much agree.

460
01:00:10,125 --> 01:00:12,805
And I'll say maybe a positive note.

461
01:00:13,525 --> 01:00:23,405
Kenya and the central bank has recognized this and specifically said that they're pausing their work because they've yet to identify what problem this solves.

462
01:00:23,625 --> 01:00:26,405
And the allure across the world is fading.

463
01:00:26,405 --> 01:00:52,345
And so that is very much good news. It's just unfortunate that so many central bankers are still barreling forward, the EU being a notable one or rather the European Central Bank being a notable one. They have announced that they are not launching a CBDC in October of this year, but they will be ready to do so.

464
01:00:52,345 --> 01:00:56,565
Ligard, I believe, has spoken to and bragged about their readiness.

465
01:00:57,305 --> 01:01:10,605
Yes. They were actually just in parliament this past week and trying to get members of parliament to agree to sign off on it because they want them to sign off so that they can go off with it.

466
01:01:10,605 --> 01:01:21,905
But that's going to be a little bit of a tense time. Once October hits, that's when they're quote unquote officially ready and then they'll just be waiting on the green light from parliament.

467
01:01:22,345 --> 01:01:28,665
So we will look to our neighbors across the ocean as an unfortunate bellwether.

468
01:01:29,385 --> 01:01:30,485
Well, Nick, thank you so much.

469
01:01:30,605 --> 01:01:31,425
I've learned a great deal.

470
01:01:31,505 --> 01:01:32,385
I'm sure everyone will.

471
01:01:32,645 --> 01:01:37,465
We'll get all the relevant links in the podcast notes because they're great resources.

472
01:01:37,465 --> 01:01:38,845
I hope we can do this again soon.

473
01:01:39,485 --> 01:01:39,805
Yes, please.

474
01:01:39,925 --> 01:01:41,345
I'm happy to chat anytime.

475
01:01:41,785 --> 01:01:44,585
As I said before, I can talk about this issue for days.

476
01:01:44,925 --> 01:01:45,885
So just say the word.

477
01:01:45,885 --> 01:01:46,345
It is deeply important.

478
01:01:46,725 --> 01:01:47,505
Thanks so much, Nick.

479
01:01:47,585 --> 01:01:47,985
Talk soon.

480
01:01:48,045 --> 01:01:48,225
You're welcome.

481
01:01:48,365 --> 01:01:48,685
Thank you.

482
01:01:48,745 --> 01:01:48,985
Bye-bye.

483
01:01:49,545 --> 01:01:49,685
Bye.

484
01:01:52,345 --> 01:01:52,705
Thank you.