1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:09,900
It's really difficult to engineer freedom tech, like, you know, solutions that like require you to kind of take ownership of your money, take ownership of your data.

2
00:00:09,900 --> 00:00:15,620
These things, you know, typically have engineering solutions that are harder to build.

3
00:00:15,760 --> 00:00:25,520
They might take a longer time to build or it might actually require the user to kind of learn something new or requires just a new way of us thinking about product building.

4
00:00:25,520 --> 00:00:31,260
So it kind of ends up being this, you know, huge disadvantage in that regard.

5
00:00:31,500 --> 00:00:42,180
Is there something inherent and even maybe some would argue noble, I think, about self-sovereignty, freedom tech requiring friction?

6
00:00:45,900 --> 00:00:47,140
Stephen DeLorm, welcome.

7
00:00:48,240 --> 00:00:49,040
Hey, thanks for having me, Sean.

8
00:00:49,420 --> 00:00:50,360
I appreciate it.

9
00:00:50,360 --> 00:00:53,300
I love the ATL BitLab background.

10
00:00:53,300 --> 00:00:56,960
So how are things in maybe sunny Georgia?

11
00:00:58,160 --> 00:00:59,780
Yeah, things are going great.

12
00:00:59,960 --> 00:01:03,140
Vibes are high at ATL BitLab as always.

13
00:01:03,400 --> 00:01:07,060
Just got another Bitcoin meetup in the lab here tonight.

14
00:01:07,420 --> 00:01:08,860
It's every single Wednesday night here.

15
00:01:09,000 --> 00:01:10,060
So things are going good.

16
00:01:10,140 --> 00:01:14,700
And I'm just looking forward to 2026 and what the community will build.

17
00:01:15,380 --> 00:01:15,720
Awesome.

18
00:01:15,920 --> 00:01:20,140
Yeah, and for anyone in Atlanta or the surrounding areas, definitely recommend you check out ATL BitLab.

19
00:01:20,300 --> 00:01:22,600
I'll be sure to have the links in the show notes.

20
00:01:22,600 --> 00:01:28,600
It is a great space with even greater people, which I've had the opportunity to spend some time in and with.

21
00:01:29,140 --> 00:01:37,160
So we are, if I am doing my calendar math correctly, Stephen, we're two days, we're recording two days after Square's Bitcoin launch.

22
00:01:37,720 --> 00:01:41,980
And that is now available to four million merchants, in-person merchants.

23
00:01:42,100 --> 00:01:45,700
I'm not sure actually if that's what they call in-person or in total.

24
00:01:45,700 --> 00:02:10,000
It is a product as I've seen, and I want to get your take with, you know, really strong UX, great design, fully custodial. And so I think the timing is perfect to, with you, explore the tension between the sort of purity of freedom tech, as it were, Bitcoin most specifically, and, you know, designing for freedom.

25
00:02:10,000 --> 00:02:21,920
And in that, people like yourselves, you're very much in the center of this, are taking into consideration what non-technical, everyday individuals want and need.

26
00:02:22,520 --> 00:02:31,160
And so, you know, with that, let's talk about sort of the seduction of, you know, great product design and smooth UX.

27
00:02:31,160 --> 00:02:39,680
So Cash App, Venmo, even some custodial wallets, they are, I think, winning because the UX is just buttery smooth.

28
00:02:39,680 --> 00:02:45,220
you know, the user experience. And meanwhile, some self-custody tools can feel like operating

29
00:02:45,220 --> 00:02:53,180
a nuclear reactor. And so as a product designer, and let's take a moment as you answer to give us a

30
00:02:53,180 --> 00:02:59,140
bit of insight into your work, how do you think about this fundamental challenge or disadvantage

31
00:02:59,140 --> 00:03:05,380
that Freedom Tech comes out of the gate with? Yeah. So I'll, you know, briefly kind of summarize

32
00:03:05,380 --> 00:03:13,060
my experience in this space. And, you know, I didn't really start off in Freedom Tech like

33
00:03:13,060 --> 00:03:19,400
most people. You know, I was just a graphic design major in college, spent the first part of my

34
00:03:19,400 --> 00:03:25,220
career doing mostly design, more focused on marketing and advertising and that sort of stuff.

35
00:03:25,220 --> 00:03:32,900
Of course, you kind of have to know some amount of building for the web to be, you know, competent

36
00:03:35,380 --> 00:03:37,800
You know, we're in a digital first world now.

37
00:03:38,240 --> 00:03:46,180
So I kind of fell into web design, web development, and then, you know, kind of fell into freedom tech along the way there.

38
00:03:47,480 --> 00:03:51,600
And so and then kind of transitioned into product design from there.

39
00:03:52,880 --> 00:03:56,400
Did, you know, work with the Bitcoin design community under a spiral grant.

40
00:03:56,400 --> 00:04:01,200
Now I work on product at Voltage from a design perspective.

41
00:04:01,200 --> 00:04:10,460
And, I mean, it's a huge disadvantage for people building FreedomTech because I think for a couple reasons.

42
00:04:10,720 --> 00:04:19,000
One, you have this idea that when you live somewhere like, let's say, the USA, where more or less your freedoms are respected.

43
00:04:19,000 --> 00:04:29,020
Like, sure, everyone will have gripes here and there about something they don't like in their particular city or state or, you know, something the president said or whatever.

44
00:04:29,020 --> 00:04:50,720
But by and large, we live in a place where like, you know, your freedoms are more or less respected. And, you know, that's that's creates a situation where you don't really need freedom tech like you can benefit from it, but you don't like need it the way that someone living under an authoritarian regime needs it right this second.

45
00:04:50,720 --> 00:04:56,460
you might need it one day but right now you don't like need it to carry on your daily business

46
00:04:56,460 --> 00:05:01,780
and then there's this this other idea that i think it's just it's really difficult to engineer

47
00:05:01,780 --> 00:05:08,740
freedom tech like you know solutions that uh like require you to kind of take ownership of your money

48
00:05:08,740 --> 00:05:15,240
take ownership of your data these things you know typically have engineering solutions that

49
00:05:15,240 --> 00:05:21,320
are harder to build or, you know, they might be harder to build. They might take a longer time to

50
00:05:21,320 --> 00:05:27,700
build or it might actually require the user to kind of learn something new or requires just a

51
00:05:27,700 --> 00:05:33,940
new way of us thinking about product building. So it kind of ends up being this, you know, huge,

52
00:05:34,060 --> 00:05:39,980
you know, disadvantage in that regard. Is there, in your view, Stephen, is there something

53
00:05:39,980 --> 00:05:48,840
inherent and even maybe some would argue noble, I think, about self-sovereignty,

54
00:05:49,000 --> 00:05:52,980
freedom tech requiring friction. What's your perspective on that?

55
00:05:54,100 --> 00:06:02,760
Should self-sovereignty and freedom tech require friction? I don't think so. I don't think it has

56
00:06:02,760 --> 00:06:08,880
to involve friction. So you don't buy that assertion, which I would assert many builders

57
00:06:08,880 --> 00:06:12,300
say, you know, is that in order to learn, you got to suffer.

58
00:06:13,860 --> 00:06:18,180
Yeah. And I think there, I think people, it's kind of like the whole idea of like,

59
00:06:18,440 --> 00:06:24,400
there's a band that you go to listen to at your local club. And it's like, you know,

60
00:06:24,860 --> 00:06:30,400
it starts, it's a band of people from your community making music. And then, you know,

61
00:06:30,400 --> 00:06:35,920
one day they get a record deal and then, you know, they, they, they get bigger and bigger.

62
00:06:35,920 --> 00:06:57,900
And then one day you're playing, they're playing the Superbowl and you're like, I don't like them anymore. I like the one they used to play in the clubs. Yeah. And it's like, you know, there's this kind of idea that like, as something becomes more accessible, when you find something early on, you, you, you like it more because it's like, well, I had to work hard to find it.

63
00:06:57,900 --> 00:07:04,160
You know, I had to follow this one obscure Instagram account just to know when this band was playing.

64
00:07:04,380 --> 00:07:07,560
And everybody else has the benefit of finding them now on Spotify.

65
00:07:07,560 --> 00:07:09,740
I had to work to listen to this band.

66
00:07:10,500 --> 00:07:19,480
And I think there's very and you can see this kind of thing happening in computing, too, where it's like, well, I used to have to work to understand how to use computers.

67
00:07:19,480 --> 00:07:20,900
Now it's all just easier.

68
00:07:20,900 --> 00:07:22,620
I compiled my kernel and now it just installs.

69
00:07:22,760 --> 00:07:22,880
Yeah.

70
00:07:23,560 --> 00:07:23,800
Yeah.

71
00:07:23,800 --> 00:07:34,220
So I think, you know, I don't like that kind of like hipster mentality of, you know, just because something is more accessible, it's no longer good.

72
00:07:34,740 --> 00:07:47,200
I do think there are some interesting ideas, though, like when we, it has been argued before that, you know, sometimes computer software maybe makes it too easy these days.

73
00:07:47,200 --> 00:07:51,180
And like the idea is that like in the 90s, you wanted to learn how to use a piece of software.

74
00:07:51,700 --> 00:07:56,020
You know, you would get a manual for how to use Adobe Illustrator that was like this thick.

75
00:07:56,120 --> 00:07:58,940
I mean, it was like three inches thick for people who were just listening.

76
00:07:58,940 --> 00:08:02,920
That section in the bookstore, you know, had those 20-pound tunes.

77
00:08:03,820 --> 00:08:10,380
But the thing is, is you actually really just by having this more mentality of like, well, I'm going to go read how to do it in the manual.

78
00:08:10,820 --> 00:08:14,900
I think you actually learned how to use the software at a much deeper level.

79
00:08:14,900 --> 00:08:24,560
so i i do think there is some merit to sometimes with software just saying look if you want this

80
00:08:24,560 --> 00:08:29,640
piece of software to fulfill your purpose for me that might be graphic design you need to educate

81
00:08:29,640 --> 00:08:35,460
yourself about how to use it that's going to make you a better you know a better more powerful user

82
00:08:35,460 --> 00:08:39,940
of this piece of software having said that i don't think every single software in the world

83
00:08:39,940 --> 00:08:41,920
needs to be to that degree.

84
00:08:42,060 --> 00:08:44,340
Like if you want to use a piece of design software

85
00:08:44,340 --> 00:08:48,600
and you want to just, you know, totally slay at, you know,

86
00:08:48,680 --> 00:08:52,420
making designs or making video or making whatever you're using

87
00:08:52,420 --> 00:08:53,700
in your particular piece of software,

88
00:08:54,740 --> 00:08:57,820
yes, you do need to kind of read the manual,

89
00:08:58,040 --> 00:09:00,600
go down the rabbit hole, so to speak, and really educate yourself.

90
00:09:00,600 --> 00:09:03,240
But like, I don't think every single piece of software,

91
00:09:03,400 --> 00:09:07,600
like certainly just a messaging app or visiting a website

92
00:09:07,600 --> 00:09:09,900
or sending money back and forth.

93
00:09:10,220 --> 00:09:12,020
I don't think that necessarily

94
00:09:12,020 --> 00:09:13,020
needs to be the friction.

95
00:09:13,160 --> 00:09:14,460
So I think it's more of a matter of like

96
00:09:14,460 --> 00:09:17,020
what kinds of software requires,

97
00:09:17,200 --> 00:09:18,620
you know, friction.

98
00:09:19,640 --> 00:09:21,140
I'll, you know, maybe it's like,

99
00:09:21,300 --> 00:09:22,740
I know I'm going on a little bit of a rant here.

100
00:09:22,960 --> 00:09:23,140
No, it's good.

101
00:09:23,800 --> 00:09:25,560
Another way to think about it is

102
00:09:25,560 --> 00:09:29,880
maybe in terms of friction,

103
00:09:30,040 --> 00:09:31,220
maybe you don't want friction

104
00:09:31,220 --> 00:09:36,720
so much as you want slowness, right?

105
00:09:36,720 --> 00:09:42,460
And so, like, I think of friction as being like, well, it was really difficult.

106
00:09:42,820 --> 00:09:44,260
It was really confusing.

107
00:09:44,520 --> 00:09:45,920
I didn't know how to do it.

108
00:09:46,340 --> 00:09:54,720
When I was using this particular piece of software, I got the impression that it was buggy or I didn't understand what it was telling me.

109
00:09:54,980 --> 00:09:56,680
That's what I think of when I think of friction.

110
00:09:56,680 --> 00:10:12,160
But, you know, for example, let's say you're trying to onboard customers to some kind of multi-sig solution that's going to help them self-custody like multitudes of Bitcoins.

111
00:10:12,700 --> 00:10:15,380
You might want that to be a slow experience.

112
00:10:15,620 --> 00:10:24,840
You might not want people to just download that thing and start using it immediately and just throw a caution to the wind.

113
00:10:24,840 --> 00:10:25,200
Right.

114
00:10:25,200 --> 00:10:40,500
You might want it to be a very slow onboarding, like, okay, we're going to onboard you to a solution for self-custodying your money. We don't want you to do this if you're in a coffee shop or if you're at a party or surrounded by lots of people.

115
00:10:40,600 --> 00:10:41,500
This is not a speed run.

116
00:10:41,500 --> 00:11:03,220
Yeah, we want you to be in a calm environment. But you can still imagine it being a very like easy or kind of like handheld process. This is going to take an hour to complete. It has 10 steps. Are you ready to begin? You can save your, you know, you can come back and resume this later if, you know, you get interrupted.

117
00:11:03,220 --> 00:11:11,180
So you can make it a very calm, handheld, understandable process and make it kind of slow.

118
00:11:11,780 --> 00:11:19,060
And that in my mind is different than like friction, which I think of as like really kind of negative and harsh and confusing.

119
00:11:19,760 --> 00:11:20,840
I think that is super interesting.

120
00:11:21,020 --> 00:11:26,220
So what I take from that is there is friction, for lack of a better word, and there's pace.

121
00:11:26,220 --> 00:11:33,720
and and i think that's really interesting um because i think about patterns like which are

122
00:11:33,720 --> 00:11:41,620
now i i believe and hopefully are standard um requiring you to enter your seed phrase you know

123
00:11:41,620 --> 00:11:47,560
play it back to prove that you've recorded it that you haven't just yoloed uh through a seed

124
00:11:47,560 --> 00:11:53,960
phrase for example and and so we're from that and you touched on this let's talk about you know the

125
00:11:53,960 --> 00:12:00,860
cost of making it easy or too easy. So one of your projects, 12cash, makes sharing payment

126
00:12:00,860 --> 00:12:07,180
information fairly or simple. But simplicity, you know, often means abstraction. Abstraction

127
00:12:07,180 --> 00:12:13,960
implies a certain level of trust. Where do you draw the line between simple enough to use and

128
00:12:13,960 --> 00:12:19,920
easy enough to fool you? The distinction between simple enough to use and easy enough to fool you.

129
00:12:19,920 --> 00:12:37,280
So, yeah, that's a good question because I think, you know, we've, I mean, we've seen certainly like controversies online as of late of like, you know, products that, you know, people felt confused by what was actually happening in the interface.

130
00:12:37,280 --> 00:12:44,740
um i don't know it's a very it's a very tough it's a very tough problem to solve i think

131
00:12:44,740 --> 00:12:50,060
you know i mean i really just think about it as in terms of trying to figure out who you're

132
00:12:50,060 --> 00:12:55,540
trying to build for right right like it's it's you don't i don't think you ever want to fool

133
00:12:55,540 --> 00:13:02,080
anybody of course that's a that's a dark pattern you know in the ui world we call those dark

134
00:13:02,080 --> 00:13:09,080
patterns where it's like when you're trying to cancel a gym membership or something like that

135
00:13:09,080 --> 00:13:15,000
and they make the you know do you sure you want to cancel and then they make the the they make

136
00:13:15,000 --> 00:13:21,960
the cancel button the big the no keep my membership button like the big you know primary solid color

137
00:13:21,960 --> 00:13:27,240
button that your eye you know gets drawn to um so yes you don't want to fool anybody you don't want

138
00:13:27,240 --> 00:13:29,160
like dark patterns or anything like that.

139
00:13:29,500 --> 00:13:29,920
Um,

140
00:13:29,920 --> 00:13:31,720
I think just from a like moral perspective.

141
00:13:32,320 --> 00:13:32,760
Um,

142
00:13:33,220 --> 00:13:37,020
but I think you really just got to think about like who you're building for and

143
00:13:37,020 --> 00:13:37,280
like,

144
00:13:37,340 --> 00:13:37,580
you know,

145
00:13:37,600 --> 00:13:39,380
what problem they're actually trying to solve.

146
00:13:39,480 --> 00:13:39,760
You know,

147
00:13:39,780 --> 00:13:43,020
you brought up the square terminal earlier and they're,

148
00:13:43,140 --> 00:13:43,880
you know,

149
00:13:44,240 --> 00:13:50,200
I don't think of like the square product as being like for dissidents or

150
00:13:50,200 --> 00:13:52,380
unbanked people or anything like that.

151
00:13:52,380 --> 00:13:53,260
It's really,

152
00:13:53,380 --> 00:13:56,700
they're just trying to solve a problem for like local businesses of like,

153
00:13:56,700 --> 00:14:03,020
you know, a coffee shop, for instance, probably before they can afford the real estate for their

154
00:14:03,020 --> 00:14:08,540
coffee shop, they probably are pouring cups of espresso at a local farmer's market. Previously,

155
00:14:08,540 --> 00:14:13,600
they were an all cash business. Now, like with Square, they can like start accepting credit

156
00:14:13,600 --> 00:14:19,580
cards. Right. And so like custody and all that is like totally acceptable for that kind of customer.

157
00:14:19,740 --> 00:14:25,200
They're not really operating in like a high friction environment. If you're building stuff

158
00:14:25,200 --> 00:14:29,260
that's like, you know, for human rights activists and stuff, you have to think about like all these

159
00:14:29,260 --> 00:14:33,880
other things about like they actually need custody of the money because most, you know,

160
00:14:34,080 --> 00:14:38,780
banks and fintech providers won't even serve their country. You need to think about like,

161
00:14:38,820 --> 00:14:44,200
you know, being able to like hide the money and make plausible deniability in case they're like

162
00:14:44,200 --> 00:14:47,760
arrested or something like that. So it's a completely different end of the spectrum.

163
00:14:48,600 --> 00:14:54,900
Voltage, a lot of the work that we're doing these days, we kind of, you know, I'll say like

164
00:14:54,900 --> 00:15:01,580
2021, the narrative was very much run your own node, right? Like run your own lightning node.

165
00:15:01,580 --> 00:15:05,520
And a lot of businesses wanted to do that. But we've kind of, as we've gotten to know our

166
00:15:05,520 --> 00:15:10,840
customers better and gotten to know the kind of customers that want to learn about Bitcoin and

167
00:15:10,840 --> 00:15:16,060
start accepting Bitcoin, we started to learn that for a lot of them, like running a lightning node

168
00:15:16,060 --> 00:15:20,660
wasn't really important to them. They just wanted to be able to accept lightning payments. And so

169
00:15:20,660 --> 00:15:25,120
for us, our solution to that problem is we're going to open a line of credit to your business

170
00:15:25,120 --> 00:15:30,620
and you can hit our API, send lightning payments as much as you want, as long as you pay back your

171
00:15:30,620 --> 00:15:36,540
line of credit, you know, at the end of your billing cycle. And so, um, you know, I think

172
00:15:36,540 --> 00:15:41,980
it's just a matter of understanding what it is that your actual customers need, uh, before you,

173
00:15:42,200 --> 00:15:47,440
you know, start building. Cause it's very easy from like a engineering, like I, I run into this

174
00:15:47,440 --> 00:15:52,380
myself, it's very appealing for me to want to build things that are like kind of technically

175
00:15:52,380 --> 00:15:55,380
fascinating and like scratch a technical itch in my brain.

176
00:15:56,100 --> 00:15:58,960
Even as a designer, I fall victim to that.

177
00:15:59,820 --> 00:16:02,900
But, you know, when you're thinking about it from like a product perspective, you really

178
00:16:02,900 --> 00:16:06,860
need to think about like who it is you're building for and like what what solves the

179
00:16:06,860 --> 00:16:07,620
problem for them.

180
00:16:08,380 --> 00:16:08,560
Yes.

181
00:16:08,660 --> 00:16:12,600
And I think as you were speaking and I mean, kudos to to you and the Voltage team, I think

182
00:16:12,600 --> 00:16:15,740
the line of credit, knowing many of you as I do.

183
00:16:15,740 --> 00:16:20,160
and having some insight into how the product has evolved,

184
00:16:20,440 --> 00:16:24,960
I think Voltage is a great example of meeting the market,

185
00:16:25,100 --> 00:16:26,520
meeting customers where they are.

186
00:16:26,900 --> 00:16:31,300
And it brings to mind this sort of slider, you know,

187
00:16:31,560 --> 00:16:47,537
between pure protocol sort of adherence and self and user experience and customer needs and wants And I know it very difficult And it an ongoing process to sort of dial that

188
00:16:47,537 --> 00:16:53,237
in as it were. Well, let me ask about maybe a few more specifics, Stephen, and those are great

189
00:16:53,237 --> 00:17:02,657
backdrops, you touched on the pace and needing to sort of slow down the intense, potentially,

190
00:17:02,657 --> 00:17:11,777
you know, high value, high risk flows of something like custodying your money, multi-sig, for

191
00:17:11,777 --> 00:17:18,477
example. Are there other areas where friction is positive, beneficial? And again, it's my word,

192
00:17:18,477 --> 00:17:25,777
not yours, but that sort of not hiding all the details, so sort of surfacing some of the complexity.

193
00:17:26,797 --> 00:17:31,557
And so that's sort of part A, you know, where are there patterns or areas where you see that

194
00:17:31,557 --> 00:17:37,557
as necessary and positive? And with it, are there, are there advice or cautionary notes you could

195
00:17:37,557 --> 00:17:45,337
offer to people about being more aware of some of those dark patterns? So, you know, where is there

196
00:17:45,337 --> 00:17:48,717
a positive application of what I would call friction?

197
00:17:49,377 --> 00:17:55,617
And where instead are we sort of seeing these dark patterns that are designed to fool the end user?

198
00:17:56,817 --> 00:18:02,897
Well, I don't think I see a lot of dark patterns in like Bitcoin and freedom.

199
00:18:03,197 --> 00:18:03,657
No, no.

200
00:18:03,857 --> 00:18:05,057
But the alternatives, right?

201
00:18:05,117 --> 00:18:05,557
The alternatives.

202
00:18:06,357 --> 00:18:06,577
Yeah.

203
00:18:08,157 --> 00:18:14,757
I would say in terms of the freedom tech world where like friction might be good,

204
00:18:14,757 --> 00:18:24,757
like some would argue that fees maybe like you know if you just want like more transparency

205
00:18:24,757 --> 00:18:32,477
fees um you know i kind of don't know i i kind of don't worry about that nearly as much just

206
00:18:32,477 --> 00:18:36,117
because i feel like at least from a lightning perspective i think a lot of the times the fees

207
00:18:36,117 --> 00:18:44,737
are so low that um you you know don't really run into an issue but i you know totally if you're

208
00:18:44,757 --> 00:18:51,037
I don't know, like a wallet that accepts on-chain and Lightning and there's like some kind of conversion happening there.

209
00:18:51,217 --> 00:19:02,017
You could certainly run into a situation where like, you know, converting between Lightning and on-chain could like maybe create some unexpected fee.

210
00:19:02,377 --> 00:19:02,397
Right.

211
00:19:02,517 --> 00:19:03,337
So I guess.

212
00:19:03,337 --> 00:19:04,317
You're doing a swap or something.

213
00:19:04,317 --> 00:19:15,177
Yeah, I guess as I work this out, as I talk about it, I think that could be a place where maybe a little more, you know, a slower pace or friction might be warranted.

214
00:19:15,177 --> 00:19:24,777
And that, like, you don't want to, like, it's very convenient to feel like, oh, it just kind of all magically swaps into whatever format the user's requesting.

215
00:19:24,777 --> 00:19:35,917
But if that swap is going to like eat up like 25% of the value of whatever it is, it's like, yeah, you might want to caution them and make them aware of that.

216
00:19:37,357 --> 00:19:50,257
I think, you know, when it comes to stuff like Nostra, actually, you know, you know, a lot of people are trying to like onboard everybody to Nostra very quickly and all that kind of stuff.

217
00:19:50,557 --> 00:19:53,777
And I guess it kind of depends on your perspective of Nostra.

218
00:19:53,777 --> 00:20:14,017
I'm a little bit of a black sheep when it comes to Noster, and I think about it a little bit differently. But, you know, there's this one kind of philosophy of Noster that's like, oh, like your Noster key is going to be like your self-sovereign identity. And, you know, you're going to use this for all of your Noster applications to represent your identity.

219
00:20:14,017 --> 00:20:27,477
Well, if that is your philosophy of how Noster works, then you probably want a little bit of a slower paced introduction, I think, because you don't want people making this identity and then losing it.

220
00:20:27,737 --> 00:20:27,757
Right.

221
00:20:27,757 --> 00:20:39,497
There's also the more ephemeral view of Nostr, which I tend to lend myself more towards, which is like the kind of BitChat version of Nostr, where you're actually not even aware that you're using Nostr.

222
00:20:40,457 --> 00:20:43,977
And you download BitChat, and it's this kind of ephemeral identity.

223
00:20:44,577 --> 00:20:51,357
There's not this illusion with BitChat that you're going to be using the same identity every single time you log on.

224
00:20:51,357 --> 00:20:57,697
And so with that regard, it's actually very, you know, easy to just onboard people quickly.

225
00:20:57,697 --> 00:21:00,717
You don't need that friction with that kind of philosophy of Noster.

226
00:21:00,717 --> 00:21:11,557
But yeah, I think it's really just those kinds of things where you're going to like cause somebody to lose money or you're going to, you're asking them to create an identity or something like that.

227
00:21:11,617 --> 00:21:16,677
I feel like those really lend themselves to a slower, more handheld pace.

228
00:21:16,677 --> 00:21:24,597
um but yeah i mean the the kind of like dark patterns i think we want to avoid are um we want

229
00:21:24,597 --> 00:21:33,317
to like avoid uh you know in like in in the the regular world that's stuff like you're trying to

230
00:21:33,317 --> 00:21:40,617
cancel something and you're trying to trick somebody into not canceling it or you're tricking

231
00:21:40,617 --> 00:21:46,317
people into upgrading to a new member, like a higher level of membership towards something,

232
00:21:46,957 --> 00:21:55,037
or you're trying to opt people into sharing their data, like you automatically have the box

233
00:21:55,037 --> 00:22:00,277
selected that says, yes, please add me to your marketing list and share my personal information

234
00:22:00,277 --> 00:22:04,757
with your advertising network. Right. Or I think of Venmo, you know, which I think the social

235
00:22:04,757 --> 00:22:09,977
aspects, and I haven't been on in years, so I'm not qualified to say what it looks like these days,

236
00:22:09,977 --> 00:22:22,297
But there was this playfulness about sharing, you know, as many would joke, it's like, I know who you pay rent to and who your weed dealer is, you know, because it's all out there.

237
00:22:22,977 --> 00:22:35,177
And so are there, I don't know that you spent a lot of time looking at this, Stephen, but in payments specifically, do you see much of that going on and that, you know, individuals should be wary of?

238
00:22:35,177 --> 00:22:38,717
I think with Venmo, I just don't get it.

239
00:22:38,717 --> 00:22:46,197
like i've i've never i've never used it i've i refuse to download it and i know it's very

240
00:22:46,197 --> 00:22:51,677
popular among my generation but i never understood the appeal of like i'm going to

241
00:22:51,677 --> 00:22:58,077
like have all my payments like broadcast publicly that just seems kind of weird um

242
00:22:58,077 --> 00:23:03,577
i don't know if i would call that a dark pattern i guess just because i i guess so many

243
00:23:03,577 --> 00:23:05,577
I guess people are aware of it.

244
00:23:05,577 --> 00:23:06,137
They're pretty upfront about it.

245
00:23:06,137 --> 00:23:06,877
I guess people like it.

246
00:23:06,877 --> 00:23:07,077
Yeah.

247
00:23:08,037 --> 00:23:08,857
And it's, you know.

248
00:23:08,877 --> 00:23:10,177
I don't get it.

249
00:23:10,197 --> 00:23:10,337
Yeah.

250
00:23:10,377 --> 00:23:13,997
It's not for us to convince someone that they should or shouldn't do anything, but I think

251
00:23:13,997 --> 00:23:19,557
it is worthwhile to call out, and I believe this is fair, correct me if you disagree,

252
00:23:20,117 --> 00:23:27,677
that in traditional sort of TradFi payments, you know, you are the product in many ways.

253
00:23:27,917 --> 00:23:31,837
There's a little, there's a vig on the payment, you know, they're making some money on the

254
00:23:31,837 --> 00:23:39,377
payment. But the data, to use the cliche, is the new oil, where I think what Bitcoin offers you in

255
00:23:39,377 --> 00:23:47,537
most cases is anonymity, if not total privacy. Yeah, if you're using it right. I would say I

256
00:23:47,537 --> 00:23:55,537
can speak to that a little. I mean, what a lot of people don't realize is, like, it's scary how much,

257
00:23:55,537 --> 00:24:01,817
you know data about you is already being sold through like credit and debit cards and stuff

258
00:24:01,817 --> 00:24:07,437
like that um i remember before i moved into freedom tech and i'd say this is probably a

259
00:24:07,437 --> 00:24:13,037
catalyst for um you know my kind of transition to freedom tech is i used to do a lot of marketing

260
00:24:13,037 --> 00:24:19,077
and advertising for like b2b tech stuff um not the kind of stuff you'd see on tv usually because

261
00:24:19,077 --> 00:24:25,497
like i said more b2b kind of stuff but i had to work on like marketing videos for so many products

262
00:24:25,497 --> 00:24:32,297
that are like deployed at, you know, large enterprises that are really just about this,

263
00:24:32,377 --> 00:24:37,157
about like, you know, collecting large amounts of data on people, trying to come up with insights

264
00:24:37,157 --> 00:24:44,317
about, you know, individuals and what they might buy. And I mean, get this, one time I had to work

265
00:24:44,317 --> 00:24:51,917
on a video that was not even, get this, it wasn't even, it was not never going to be seen by end

266
00:24:51,917 --> 00:24:57,797
users it was never going to be seen even as a business market like advertising to other

267
00:24:57,797 --> 00:25:07,057
businesses this was a video designed to pitch a single data analytics idea to some executives

268
00:25:07,057 --> 00:25:14,097
at a very large soft drink company that everyone probably drinks and so and i was like looking at

269
00:25:14,097 --> 00:25:18,977
all the people in the room working on the video with me good people all of them good designers to

270
00:25:18,977 --> 00:25:23,297
work with but i'm like looking and i'm like trying to calculate like well we've been working on this

271
00:25:23,297 --> 00:25:29,157
for a couple weeks now and i'm like wow this video probably has a budget of at least thirty thousand

272
00:25:29,157 --> 00:25:38,777
dollars this was a probably a budget of thirty thousand dollars to make a video designed to pitch

273
00:25:38,777 --> 00:25:46,857
an idea to like a group of five people and that's how much money right is in data and analytics it

274
00:25:46,857 --> 00:25:57,017
it is such a like profitable money machine that you know dropping 30k just to pitch the idea to

275
00:25:57,017 --> 00:26:04,097
a group of five people is totally worth it in their book and i worked on the other project for

276
00:26:04,097 --> 00:26:11,197
a company that all they do is hook into um like uh you know they they partner with banks and say

277
00:26:11,197 --> 00:26:15,657
give us all the data about your customers' financial transactions.

278
00:26:16,457 --> 00:26:22,157
And then we will find advertisers who want to advertise to them and we'll kind of like

279
00:26:22,157 --> 00:26:24,977
do like a matchmaking operation between that.

280
00:26:25,197 --> 00:26:30,817
And a lot of major banks that everybody knows the names of actually, you know, are customers

281
00:26:30,817 --> 00:26:31,537
of this company.

282
00:26:31,777 --> 00:26:32,837
And it is routine, right?

283
00:26:32,877 --> 00:26:39,677
And I think that's the thing that is worth taking away among great points there.

284
00:26:39,677 --> 00:26:51,937
You know, if anyone wants to try this out, sign up for one of these services that automates the process of getting your data removed from brokers and getting them to stop collecting.

285
00:26:52,337 --> 00:26:53,577
I use one in particular.

286
00:26:53,877 --> 00:26:56,017
I'll remember what it is at some point.

287
00:26:56,317 --> 00:27:07,997
I've been enrolled for about six months, and they're at 900 data brokers and counting that have my data that they're removing me from, so they say, I believe.

288
00:27:07,997 --> 00:27:16,637
And many, many will not sort of agree to a checkbox that says, you know, don't start again.

289
00:27:16,757 --> 00:27:17,517
They will start again.

290
00:27:17,557 --> 00:27:19,077
And I'll have to do this process continually.

291
00:27:19,317 --> 00:27:25,277
So all that to say it is remarkable what a massive industry that is behind the scenes.

292
00:27:25,317 --> 00:27:32,877
And that is the de facto with not just payments apps, but certainly financial services stand to gain the most.

293
00:27:33,317 --> 00:27:35,837
Well, on that note, Stephen, let's talk more about Square.

294
00:27:35,837 --> 00:27:40,597
So as we said, they rolled out Bitcoin payments to millions of merchants.

295
00:27:40,897 --> 00:27:41,777
I don't know about you.

296
00:27:41,897 --> 00:27:42,677
I took a look.

297
00:27:42,957 --> 00:27:47,197
Someone floated their onboarding video, their merchant-facing onboarding video.

298
00:27:47,497 --> 00:27:49,557
Looked quite straightforward to me.

299
00:27:51,777 --> 00:27:53,037
What's your read?

300
00:27:53,137 --> 00:27:54,697
Is this how Bitcoin wins?

301
00:27:55,657 --> 00:27:57,077
Is it a necessary step?

302
00:27:57,437 --> 00:27:58,237
Yeah, so please.

303
00:27:59,597 --> 00:28:01,057
Probably how Bitcoin wins.

304
00:28:01,057 --> 00:28:11,637
Yeah, I mean, it's just one more step in Bitcoin, you know, gaining the mass adoption that, you know, a lot of people in the Bitcoin industry are crazy for.

305
00:28:13,117 --> 00:28:16,117
I think it's a great move, actually.

306
00:28:18,217 --> 00:28:29,357
Like, I think the problem with, like, trying to onboard merchants to Bitcoin before, there's a couple problems with it.

307
00:28:29,357 --> 00:28:44,197
Like, one, when a lot of times when Bitcoiners go with this narrative of, you know, we're trying to fix inflation and like, oh, my God, every problem in our society is caused by inflation.

308
00:28:45,397 --> 00:28:52,477
Yeah. And they're like, dude, I'm just trying to pour coffee for people and like, you know, you know, make ends meet at the end of the month.

309
00:28:52,477 --> 00:29:00,297
Like it's, it's, and so you got to meet, I think, business owners where they're at and, and what they're trying to do is they're trying to get customers.

310
00:29:00,297 --> 00:29:04,357
They're trying to retain customers and they're trying to lower their expenses too.

311
00:29:04,937 --> 00:29:12,957
Um, and so, uh, with definitely with the, the fee model, like the really low fee model, like that's huge.

312
00:29:12,957 --> 00:29:22,417
Um, another kind of problem with onboarding merchants before was, um, you know, just like we've talked about like the friction with kind of self custodial wallet.

313
00:29:22,477 --> 00:29:28,717
Um, even if that business owner, if you can kind of, you know, convince them like, yeah,

314
00:29:28,777 --> 00:29:31,757
you know, you should download the self-custodial wallet and they might use it for their own

315
00:29:31,757 --> 00:29:37,397
personal uses, but it's a much more complicated matter of like onboard a business where you

316
00:29:37,397 --> 00:29:43,097
might be hiring somebody, um, to, you know, work in your coffee shop to continue this

317
00:29:43,097 --> 00:29:45,977
example who, um, you don't know very well.

318
00:29:46,337 --> 00:29:49,197
Um, you, you count the cash register at the end of the night, right?

319
00:29:49,217 --> 00:29:51,437
Like that's just typical for any business.

320
00:29:51,437 --> 00:30:03,197
It's like you can't just have a situation where like, you know, everybody, you know, every person you hire for your business has access to this health custodial Bitcoin.

321
00:30:04,317 --> 00:30:14,437
And, you know, I know there's certainly great solutions like BTC Pay Server and all that, but typically there's just been it's been kind of hard to onboard people.

322
00:30:14,437 --> 00:30:24,357
And there's been a lot of, you know, community initiatives around the world to like onboard people like, oh, we're going to go out to businesses and try and, you know, convince them to accept Bitcoin.

323
00:30:24,857 --> 00:30:26,377
But you got to think about it.

324
00:30:26,417 --> 00:30:29,397
It's kind of like you're trying to onboard them to a self-custodial Bitcoin wallet.

325
00:30:29,897 --> 00:30:31,957
Who's the tech support for that business?

326
00:30:32,637 --> 00:30:41,557
That that has always been that's why I've in the past have never like really tried to do much community outreach here in Atlanta, because it's like a busy guy.

327
00:30:41,557 --> 00:30:44,317
I don't want to do tech support like one on one.

328
00:30:44,317 --> 00:30:47,437
And I'm happy to like talk to, you know, people and answer the questions on Bitcoin.

329
00:30:47,557 --> 00:30:55,337
But like, I don't want to get into a situation where like me and my friends are like, like kind of like free tech support for local businesses.

330
00:30:55,577 --> 00:30:56,557
We do that for our families.

331
00:30:58,557 --> 00:30:59,397
Yeah, exactly.

332
00:30:59,777 --> 00:31:04,337
The Square thing is great because it's like it meets them where they're at in terms of fee savings.

333
00:31:05,417 --> 00:31:10,297
And it also is kind of like bundled into a service that already has tech support.

334
00:31:10,297 --> 00:31:19,197
And on that note, by the time this podcast drops, I'm sure the announcement will already be out there. So there's kind of an initiative.

335
00:31:19,197 --> 00:31:21,017
We're publishing today, so be careful.

336
00:31:22,217 --> 00:31:25,677
No, no, I think the tweet is supposed to be out this morning.

337
00:31:25,677 --> 00:31:45,117
So Haley Burko and Matt Bayless from Spiral have been working on this kind of like merchant adoption initiative. And so a lot of the Bitcoin community spaces around the world are helping. ATL BitLab's involved. I think both of the Bitcoin parks and the space are involved and probably some other ones that I'm forgetting at the moment.

338
00:31:45,117 --> 00:31:51,977
we basically have like these uh you know bitcoin plushies like you know the grumpy bitcoin the

339
00:31:51,977 --> 00:31:56,937
here comes that explains the box of them that i saw at bitcoin park last night exactly so we got

340
00:31:56,937 --> 00:32:02,897
a bunch of boxes here too and uh so we're starting a movement so we're sending out a atl bitlab street

341
00:32:02,897 --> 00:32:08,757
team um with plushies and onboarding letters to try and onboard our favorite businesses and the

342
00:32:08,757 --> 00:32:13,537
kind of letter it's it's it's it's actually very cute and adorable it's kind of like written from

343
00:32:13,537 --> 00:32:17,917
the perspective of the grumpy bitcoin and it's like why am i grumpy it's like because i'm grumpy

344
00:32:17,917 --> 00:32:23,997
because of three percent credit card fees nice um and it's just like the the whole like you know

345
00:32:23,997 --> 00:32:28,697
campaign they've started is really like meeting merchants where they're at which is not like

346
00:32:28,697 --> 00:32:35,157
talking about liquidity inflation and freedom yeah it's just like hey if you're already a square

347
00:32:35,157 --> 00:32:39,497
merchant you can turn this option on if you're not a square merchant we can help you with that

348
00:32:39,497 --> 00:33:05,257
But like, if you're already Square Merchant, you can turn it on. You can save money on fees. And that'll be great. And so we're going to start some more stuff at BitLab here just in terms of like if some of these merchants have questions, we can have like a merchant night or something where people like a merchant town hall. But by and large, we'll probably just be driving people to the Bitcoin merchants like Facebook group. And that's really just like meeting merchants where they're at, solving a problem for them.

349
00:33:05,257 --> 00:33:25,554
So yes I think Square and to answer your question I think what Square is doing is great and it just kind of another little domino that gets tipped We see who next Love it Well and in fact on that note who else would you give accolades perhaps to Stephen who you think is balancing usability with trust or

350
00:33:25,554 --> 00:33:29,014
permissionlessness, if we want to sort of put that on the other end of the spectrum? Who's doing a

351
00:33:29,014 --> 00:33:34,634
good job of striking that balance? Hmm. Wow, that's a good question. I wonder who is striking

352
00:33:34,634 --> 00:33:42,974
permissionlessness and trust like uh i would say in terms of my favorite products and is this

353
00:33:42,974 --> 00:33:48,794
bitcoin specific or just broadly free broadly anything you care to to draw attention to my

354
00:33:48,794 --> 00:33:57,334
my favorite one that i like people have always heard me talk about is signal um i think that

355
00:33:57,334 --> 00:34:04,594
just i i compare most freedom tech products against signal because i've been using them for

356
00:34:04,594 --> 00:34:10,454
eight years and I think I'll probably still be using them for eight years. And I think just in

357
00:34:10,454 --> 00:34:19,554
terms of, um, being easy to onboard people to, uh, I've never had to really, I've never really

358
00:34:19,554 --> 00:34:24,354
had to hold anybody's hands much. I can basically just tell them somebody to download the app and

359
00:34:24,354 --> 00:34:30,514
then message me on it. Um, it's built in such a way to where it actually doesn't really expose

360
00:34:30,514 --> 00:34:37,714
private keys. It really, you know, kind of stores it in the phone's enclave and keeps it kind of

361
00:34:37,714 --> 00:34:41,814
hidden so that the user doesn't have a foot gun. They can't accidentally shoot themselves in the

362
00:34:41,814 --> 00:34:48,834
foot and expose their key material. So that one has just been like a true blessing. And, you know,

363
00:34:48,894 --> 00:34:53,054
you're talking about balancing permissionlessness and trust, like they can't read your messages.

364
00:34:53,054 --> 00:34:58,794
is it does rely on some centralized like kind of signal coordination servers.

365
00:35:00,194 --> 00:35:06,874
And, you know, in that regard, I guess that is a, you know, single point of failure, which

366
00:35:06,874 --> 00:35:07,974
isn't great.

367
00:35:08,214 --> 00:35:14,634
But I think that we've seen a pretty good track record of good behavior on terms of

368
00:35:14,634 --> 00:35:19,254
like the signal like found and like just being run by a nonprofit foundation, I think is

369
00:35:19,254 --> 00:35:20,634
a pretty good model.

370
00:35:20,634 --> 00:35:34,114
So I think that like it's really, really easy from like an engineering standpoint to kind of become fascinated with decentralization and be like, we need everything decentralized and we need everything distributed.

371
00:35:34,594 --> 00:35:38,094
And I don't really know if that's a good way to think about it.

372
00:35:38,134 --> 00:35:43,654
I think it's more of a model of like, well, what kinds of things need to be decentralized?

373
00:35:44,174 --> 00:35:48,014
What kinds of things need to be distributed and how much do they need to be so?

374
00:35:48,014 --> 00:36:03,174
And so when we talk about Bitcoin nodes, we talk about like Bitcoin being this like source of money for the world. Like, yes, obviously we want Bitcoin to be as decentralized, you know, decentralized AF. But and we want like, you know, decentralized Bitcoin nodes at all costs.

375
00:36:03,174 --> 00:36:08,574
but when we think about other kinds of technology it's like you may actually get to a point where

376
00:36:08,574 --> 00:36:14,874
too much decentralization actually makes it like you know just like you know ungodly hard to use

377
00:36:14,874 --> 00:36:20,334
so i think signal strikes that balance they just like they they focus solely on like we want it to

378
00:36:20,334 --> 00:36:25,054
be private we want it to be we don't want there to be user foot guns we'll accept a little bit

379
00:36:25,054 --> 00:36:29,714
centralization trade-offs we just want it to be super private super easy no user foot guns

380
00:36:29,714 --> 00:36:38,214
um so i think that uh they uh do that very well um in terms of you know like unchained is another

381
00:36:38,214 --> 00:36:44,614
product i'm a fan i'm on the bitcoin side it's like you know we we they they're and and their

382
00:36:44,614 --> 00:36:51,374
whole thing is they're they're like look we're centralized uh we can you know obviously if we

383
00:36:51,374 --> 00:36:55,954
are part of your multi-sig quorum we can see your money so they they don't really err they

384
00:36:55,954 --> 00:37:04,994
They don't really focus so much on like the, you know, privacy side, I feel like, but they do focus on like this core idea that like we will not custody your money.

385
00:37:06,294 --> 00:37:13,794
Like, you know, that and if you do want to enter into like some kind of loan agreement with us or whatever, we're going to have like a third party have one of the keys.

386
00:37:14,374 --> 00:37:15,714
They're very, very good at that.

387
00:37:15,714 --> 00:37:27,274
So I think it's just like a really like an idea of trying to figure out like what is like the core value and like the most important part of your product.

388
00:37:27,434 --> 00:37:28,774
For Signal, it's privacy.

389
00:37:28,994 --> 00:37:32,814
For Unchained, it's like we want to encourage self-custody.

390
00:37:33,454 --> 00:37:43,094
You know, at Voltage now, we, you know, our kind of, you know, efforts mostly now is like easy engineering integration and interoperability.

391
00:37:43,094 --> 00:37:50,834
right so like for us we're focusing more on making it easy easy for engineering teams to adopt and

392
00:37:50,834 --> 00:37:56,214
we're focusing on making it interoperable with any other you know bitcoin and lightning service

393
00:37:56,214 --> 00:38:02,794
um you know that's kind of where our focus is right now um so i think it's like you know my

394
00:38:02,794 --> 00:38:07,854
some of my favorite products are just the ones that really really know what the thing is that

395
00:38:07,854 --> 00:38:13,734
they're trying to optimize for. And for whom, as you said earlier. Yeah, know your audience,

396
00:38:13,854 --> 00:38:18,394
know your customer. Great points. And I'm big fans of both. And I think it's interesting.

397
00:38:19,054 --> 00:38:25,634
And Signal does deserve tremendous accolades and credit. They are the one most everyone,

398
00:38:25,634 --> 00:38:30,994
you know, starts with because they're such a shining example. So shout out to Signal and

399
00:38:30,994 --> 00:38:35,214
everyone I think should be using it. And another product I can think of from a FreedomTech

400
00:38:35,214 --> 00:38:41,334
perspective that I think does a really great job is Proton and just the whole suite of Proton

401
00:38:41,334 --> 00:38:47,894
services, ProtonMail, ProtonCalendar, Protondrive. And I do not get paid to shell them, though I

402
00:38:47,894 --> 00:38:53,914
kind of wish they would reach out because I feel like I show them so much. They just,

403
00:38:54,354 --> 00:38:59,874
I started as a ProtonMail user when it was like really kind of rough around the edges and just

404
00:38:59,874 --> 00:39:05,194
stuck with it. And I just, it's been so impressive to see their whole product stack and kind of

405
00:39:05,194 --> 00:39:12,354
Similar to, you know, you know, Signal, they've just they've isolated what it is that they want to optimize around, which is privacy.

406
00:39:12,354 --> 00:39:20,094
And, you know, you have that centralization, you know, thing right there, but they're not optimizing for decentralization.

407
00:39:20,094 --> 00:39:29,374
They're optimizing for privacy. And I think that that just goes to show that from a business perspective, you know, there is business models around freedom tech.

408
00:39:29,374 --> 00:39:46,574
But I think you just can't go into it trying to, you know, tick every single box on day one. You can't be like, we are going to be private. We are going to be decentralized. We are going to be peer to peer. We're going to be interoperable.

409
00:39:46,574 --> 00:39:51,354
Like you just you can imagine like all these different metrics you could try and optimize for.

410
00:39:51,494 --> 00:39:55,274
And it's really, really, really difficult to optimize for all of those.

411
00:39:55,274 --> 00:40:11,894
And when you do like Proton and you choose to just optimize for like one or two things, you can really make a ton of progress as a product and actually get like long term sustainable customers.

412
00:40:12,514 --> 00:40:16,554
So, yeah, find find your core value and optimize for that.

413
00:40:16,574 --> 00:40:23,394
is my take. Yes, agree completely. And I think when you, and I'm also a longtime Proton user,

414
00:40:23,394 --> 00:40:29,114
and they, if I'm not mistaken, have a hundred million users. So it is remarkable the scale

415
00:40:29,114 --> 00:40:35,854
that they've reached with privacy as the primary selling point. And they remind me,

416
00:40:36,174 --> 00:40:40,934
as some others do, that, you know, long ago, pardon me, long ago, Google,

417
00:40:40,934 --> 00:40:47,034
their mantra was don't be evil. And that has long since been struck from all documentation,

418
00:40:47,254 --> 00:40:54,054
websites and the like. But I think Proton and Unchained in their own way are examples of a

419
00:40:54,054 --> 00:40:59,794
bigger, better commitment, which is can't be evil, right? Unchained, and I'm a client,

420
00:40:59,794 --> 00:41:04,674
delighted client, great team, know so many of them, a big fan, not taking any money.

421
00:41:05,174 --> 00:41:10,874
So just to say that they're a great product and a great company, you know, they can help

422
00:41:10,874 --> 00:41:15,754
you, they cannot materially harm you. So if they were compelled, as you said, they could disclose

423
00:41:15,754 --> 00:41:23,074
some details, but they cannot take control of funds. Proton, while centralized, because of the

424
00:41:23,074 --> 00:41:28,174
way, you know, they're very, in my mind, sound cryptography works, you do lose some features.

425
00:41:28,174 --> 00:41:33,714
You know, I can't easily integrate Proton Calendar into some slick, you know, native desktop app,

426
00:41:34,074 --> 00:41:38,754
but they cannot see my data. They cannot, as you know, someone will correct me if I'm wrong,

427
00:41:38,754 --> 00:41:44,174
But they can't be evil in that regard, which I think is a great shout out to them.

428
00:41:44,734 --> 00:42:00,794
If we then transition, Stephen, to what I think I understand that you and other product designers, UX designers, sort of human computer interface discipline would study is psychology.

429
00:42:00,794 --> 00:42:29,894
And so with this, I'm curious, when someone makes the choice to use Cash App, and that is not a slam on Cash App, it's a great product, when they choose that over, say, a self-custodial wallet, let's just pick Blitz, you know, as I think a fine example, not at the technical level, but what's your understanding at the sort of human level, the psychological level, what's the story behind why they make the choice they make?

430
00:42:29,894 --> 00:42:34,314
Is it as simple as one is easier, one is harder, or is there more to it?

431
00:42:34,314 --> 00:42:44,734
I think why someone would use Cash App versus a self-custodial one would depend on, well, like, how are they approaching Bitcoin from the start?

432
00:42:45,174 --> 00:42:57,274
Like, you know, if they're not a Cash App user and they're not, like, let's say they don't have Cash App and they also don't have a Bitcoin wallet.

433
00:42:57,354 --> 00:42:58,854
They're starting completely from scratch.

434
00:42:58,854 --> 00:43:02,774
you know it might be that they choose cash app just because it lets them buy bitcoin

435
00:43:02,774 --> 00:43:09,634
i mean that's a huge thing that i think a lot of wallets ignore uh is just buying acquiring bitcoin

436
00:43:09,634 --> 00:43:17,794
um like it's it's i know it's very appealing this idea to like get bitcoin in a peer-to-peer

437
00:43:17,794 --> 00:43:23,674
capacity um but you know when people i think when people are thinking about it more from like an

438
00:43:23,674 --> 00:43:30,094
investing use case or savings use case they need to actually get bitcoin and so it's really i think

439
00:43:30,094 --> 00:43:34,474
for one it's just a features standpoint cash app lets you buy can't use it if you don't have it

440
00:43:34,474 --> 00:43:39,574
yeah exactly and so a lot of wallets they it's kind of this cold start problem it's like well

441
00:43:39,574 --> 00:43:45,154
yeah you can download this wallet and there's no kyc and all that but it's like what do i do i just

442
00:43:45,154 --> 00:43:51,234
like look at the number zero um another thing another way to look at it might be that like

443
00:43:51,234 --> 00:43:57,374
maybe it's uh they already were a cash app user and it's like well yeah i could download you know

444
00:43:57,374 --> 00:44:03,674
this other wallet but i already have cash app i think there's very much a sense of like app fatigue

445
00:44:03,674 --> 00:44:09,774
nowadays like i don't want another app great point and this is like among technical and

446
00:44:09,774 --> 00:44:17,194
non-technical people there's just this fatigue with more services and apps and websites you have

447
00:44:17,194 --> 00:44:21,654
to register for. And so I think for a lot of people, it's just like, well, I already have

448
00:44:21,654 --> 00:44:28,554
cash up. Why not just use that? And, you know, that's an interesting, sorry to interrupt. I was

449
00:44:28,554 --> 00:44:33,174
just going to say that, you know, I had this aha moment, which is perhaps should be obvious given

450
00:44:33,174 --> 00:44:39,154
that I work in tech and have my whole career is, you know, what, what struck me as you said that

451
00:44:39,154 --> 00:44:47,094
is the preciousness increasingly of the real estate on a user's phone. And so if you've got

452
00:44:47,094 --> 00:44:54,714
an install, what I hear you say is there's going to be a natural incentive to keep adding features

453
00:44:54,714 --> 00:44:59,454
so that the user doesn't turn to a different competitive app. It's like, let me jam everything

454
00:44:59,454 --> 00:45:05,374
in there, which is the, you know, the sloppy way to do it. But in effect, once I've got a user,

455
00:45:05,894 --> 00:45:09,734
let's retain that user and serve them with every possible feature we can imagine.

456
00:45:09,734 --> 00:45:38,734
Yeah, absolutely. It's kind of funny because a lot of times in UI design in the West, we're like, we have this tendency to want to make things as simple as possible. And like, if you look at like the evolution of software design from like over the past 30 years, it's gone from interfaces with like, you know, full plane control, you know, cockpit kind of situations to just being like, here's a screen with a single sentence.

457
00:45:38,734 --> 00:45:44,754
sentence and one big blue button and it's like that's like and and and like so we like that in

458
00:45:44,754 --> 00:45:51,234
the west but it's funny if you look at ui design from like china and vietnam and and places in asia

459
00:45:51,234 --> 00:45:57,594
it's completely the opposite they love that like cockpit um you know kind of thing and it's like a

460
00:45:57,594 --> 00:46:03,974
different psychology it's kind of like like wechat very popular in china and it's like uh there's

461
00:46:03,974 --> 00:46:09,874
this idea that like this one app handles all of your needs um it's it's like more of this comforting

462
00:46:09,874 --> 00:46:16,094
idea that like everything i need is right here it takes care of me and it's not just like actually

463
00:46:16,094 --> 00:46:22,574
chatting it's also like a wallet it's also a map like it's like google maps so it would be like if

464
00:46:22,574 --> 00:46:31,994
your venmo your uh you know i message um your google maps um yelp everything was just like all

465
00:46:31,994 --> 00:46:38,354
bundled into one interface. But that's been a very, like, you know, good business model for WeChat.

466
00:46:38,974 --> 00:46:43,474
So, you know, anyways, that's more of a tangential thing. There's just this really big difference.

467
00:46:43,814 --> 00:46:47,634
But I think what, you know, here again, what strikes me, and I'm sure there are

468
00:46:47,634 --> 00:46:53,294
papers on this all over the place, but it seems that there might be a correlation

469
00:46:53,294 --> 00:47:00,814
between a more collectivist society. And as you, I think your word, Stephen, take care of me,

470
00:47:00,814 --> 00:47:16,214
You know, do it for me. And the rugged individualists that we like to believe we are in the U.S., which is, no, that's OK. I'll pick. I'll pick and choose. And that that would translate into, you know, that device that we carry around with us all day long.

471
00:47:16,214 --> 00:47:21,234
that very well could be i think that i think that might be part of it i mean we definitely have kind

472
00:47:21,234 --> 00:47:27,014
of uh you know with the history of capitalism in this country there's almost like a personal

473
00:47:27,014 --> 00:47:32,854
identity wrapped up in brands and like this is the thing is like when people really really like

474
00:47:32,854 --> 00:47:37,834
a brand they start to like kind of identify their brand kind of like how i'll wax poetic about you

475
00:47:37,834 --> 00:47:44,274
know proton um you know you you know you you kind of we identify with products and brands that kind

476
00:47:44,274 --> 00:47:51,434
of not only we enjoy using but also that we feel like match our values yes um and like who what we

477
00:47:51,434 --> 00:47:56,454
stand for and and and i know and it's and like it's easy to say those kinds of things when we're

478
00:47:56,454 --> 00:48:03,914
talking about freedom tech but this even like you know comes down to things like like fast food

479
00:48:03,914 --> 00:48:08,874
brands and all of that and i remember like i remember seeing this like meme online a long time

480
00:48:08,874 --> 00:48:14,694
ago i mean it was some like really stupid meme but it was like this like guy being like you know

481
00:48:14,694 --> 00:48:21,034
what are you doing going to chipotle and moe's and places like that to get a burrito like taco

482
00:48:21,034 --> 00:48:26,234
bell was there for you with like that value meal and all of that and it was like but it's it's true

483
00:48:26,234 --> 00:48:30,334
it's like people have these like emotional connections with things and like you know for

484
00:48:30,334 --> 00:48:36,214
for somebody it might be that like yeah i remember like that taco bell value meal when i was in

485
00:48:36,214 --> 00:48:42,054
college and didn't have any money. That was dope. So, you know, we formed these kinds of things.

486
00:48:42,294 --> 00:48:48,254
And so, you know, if you if you can, you know, bring somebody into your kind of product vision

487
00:48:48,254 --> 00:48:53,754
with like not only the product that you are actually giving them and the value you're giving

488
00:48:53,754 --> 00:48:57,954
them, but also like the kind of vision of the world and how you make them feel about it,

489
00:48:57,954 --> 00:49:03,414
you can really kind of form a relationship. And, you know, you don't want to abuse that

490
00:49:03,414 --> 00:49:08,154
relationship. But once that relationship is in place, that opens up the door for you to

491
00:49:08,154 --> 00:49:12,134
make all kinds of other kinds of products for those people. Keep that customer engaged.

492
00:49:12,774 --> 00:49:19,394
Yes. And I think that is such an interesting and important point to make, which is, and I don't

493
00:49:19,394 --> 00:49:23,574
want to be a hypocrite because as I have told anyone who will listen to me and have said many

494
00:49:23,574 --> 00:49:30,194
times on the podcast, that after owning an iPhone since 2007 and having Mac since the 90s,

495
00:49:30,194 --> 00:49:38,134
I made a switch to another product plug for, you know, no money's exchanged hands, but

496
00:49:38,134 --> 00:49:43,634
framework, laptop, and a Pixel 9 running graphene.

497
00:49:43,634 --> 00:49:45,434
So those are my two go-to devices.

498
00:49:45,434 --> 00:49:57,251
And so you know I sort of purposely broke out of the Apple ecosystem And my point to all that being they as a business have done brilliantly I have bought a frightening amount of their products

499
00:49:58,211 --> 00:50:14,892
But I think the nefariousness, be it designed or incidental, is as those products become more like appliances and as the experience just becomes smoother and easier and more fully integrated,

500
00:50:14,892 --> 00:50:29,251
It's just so easy to do the next thing, you know, with Apple or to use the next Apple app that they probably have stolen the concept from some third party independent app developer and now integrated into the operating system and so on and so forth.

501
00:50:29,251 --> 00:50:45,451
And so, you know, that is a rambling lead up, Stephen, to, you know, what would you say to someone nodding along to most of this that, yes, you know, Venmo's fun, even though it exposes my data.

502
00:50:45,951 --> 00:50:53,652
Apple is incredible, even though the iPad is an appliance that I can't really, you know, get under the hood and do anything with.

503
00:50:53,652 --> 00:51:00,032
what if anything is your call to action to people to get a little more uncomfortable

504
00:51:00,032 --> 00:51:05,932
you know what's or would you you know what what are those conversations like that you might have

505
00:51:05,932 --> 00:51:12,132
with an individual at atl bit lab or on the street or you know at chipotle yeah um that's a good

506
00:51:12,132 --> 00:51:18,432
question i mean like it's kind of like how do you how do you turn somebody on to freedom tech and

507
00:51:18,432 --> 00:51:23,432
And I don't really, I don't know if I know the great answer to that.

508
00:51:23,811 --> 00:51:25,492
If there is one, you're retired tomorrow.

509
00:51:26,791 --> 00:51:28,672
Yeah, that's the thing.

510
00:51:28,672 --> 00:51:40,532
Because it's like I find that people become most interested in these things when something bad happens to them.

511
00:51:40,532 --> 00:51:59,691
Um, and I, I, I guess my personal experience has been that a lot of times people just don't care until something bad happens. Now you have the kind of the, the, the nerd, the engineer kind of person who, you know, is just intuitively interested in these things.

512
00:51:59,691 --> 00:52:14,552
And because they want to know how something works under the hood, there's a whole class of because I also I help my friend Jordan out with his show, The Sovereign Computing Show, where he talks a lot of like very, very much in depth about these things.

513
00:52:14,552 --> 00:52:17,892
And it's kind of interesting as we dive into topics on that show.

514
00:52:19,471 --> 00:52:22,052
You know, there's a lot of people who are just like, yeah, I want freedom.

515
00:52:22,392 --> 00:52:29,512
There's also a whole class of person who's interested in like self-hosting just from a like kind of academic.

516
00:52:30,211 --> 00:52:30,691
Sure.

517
00:52:31,112 --> 00:52:32,112
Perspective.

518
00:52:32,691 --> 00:52:39,512
Someone who's just like, I want to set up a home network and self-host all this stuff just because, you know, I'm curious.

519
00:52:39,771 --> 00:52:42,052
And I took a networking class and I can.

520
00:52:42,052 --> 00:52:42,291
Yeah.

521
00:52:42,291 --> 00:52:55,971
And so I think for that kind of class of person, kind of, you know, your kind of pitch is just like, you know, it's the hackable money wallet or it's the hackable mail client.

522
00:52:56,231 --> 00:52:58,132
It's the hackable messaging thing.

523
00:52:58,271 --> 00:53:04,612
It's something that you can, you know, you're almost kind of like pitching it as almost like a toy to them.

524
00:53:05,612 --> 00:53:11,412
Because even though it is useful, it kind of is like the, you know, the saying, the bigger the boys, the bigger the toys.

525
00:53:11,412 --> 00:53:14,912
I don't mean to gender that, but it's really like my mind.

526
00:53:15,912 --> 00:53:16,592
I'm sorry.

527
00:53:16,672 --> 00:53:19,032
I was, you know, we used to crack open the hood on the Mustang.

528
00:53:19,392 --> 00:53:23,032
You know, the engines are not so accessible anymore, but technology is.

529
00:53:23,132 --> 00:53:23,791
Sorry, please continue.

530
00:53:24,112 --> 00:53:25,392
Yeah, so exactly.

531
00:53:25,552 --> 00:53:36,572
It's like so for people who enjoy, you know, just like the tinkering, that is that is the allure of Freedom Tech is that this stuff is built in a way that you can tinker with it.

532
00:53:36,572 --> 00:53:51,592
For everybody else, though, for the people who are not, you know, garage tinkerers and, you know, self, you know, PC hobbyists and all these things, I really find that people need something bad to happen before they get.

533
00:53:51,652 --> 00:53:53,352
And that doesn't mean catastrophically bad.

534
00:53:53,592 --> 00:53:56,152
No, but, you know, there's a privacy breach every other day.

535
00:53:56,432 --> 00:53:56,672
Right.

536
00:53:56,971 --> 00:53:57,892
And I often think about that.

537
00:53:57,892 --> 00:54:04,072
So they need to be like, yeah, they need to be like in the headlines, Equifax got hacked again, let's say, for example.

538
00:54:04,072 --> 00:54:08,932
and then it's like click here to find out if you're on the list oh crap i was on the list

539
00:54:08,932 --> 00:54:13,971
what do i do and then people get interested in that or like someone hacked into my email and

540
00:54:13,971 --> 00:54:19,392
and like okay well now you need to get into password management right um or it might be like

541
00:54:19,392 --> 00:54:26,152
um i i wonder you know and i'll get your take on this if there's not a fatigue there you know the

542
00:54:26,152 --> 00:54:33,612
the credit agencies um ironically named have so little credit um with i think the average individual

543
00:54:33,612 --> 00:54:39,671
that that breach, that yet another breach is almost like, all right, so I get six months of

544
00:54:39,671 --> 00:54:45,952
free credit reporting and God knows what's going to happen to my data delete, you know? So I say

545
00:54:45,952 --> 00:54:51,751
that to sort of prompt, do you think it's ratcheting up? Does it have to be catastrophic

546
00:54:51,751 --> 00:54:58,572
in order for someone to make a significant change? It might have to be, but I hope not.

547
00:54:58,852 --> 00:55:00,052
Yeah, certainly.

548
00:55:00,052 --> 00:55:22,671
Definitely when it comes to, I mean, definitely you're right. There is a bunch of fatigue and there are like an overwhelming number of people. I mean, I hear this opinion all the time when people are just like, I don't care. They have all my data. They're tracking my every move. And I really, I don't like that attitude a lot.

549
00:55:22,671 --> 00:55:24,392
But, you know, it is there.

550
00:55:24,471 --> 00:55:28,992
I'm just like, yeah, I'm just kind of like, yo, like toughen up.

551
00:55:29,211 --> 00:55:32,532
Like, you know, like you don't like you're hot.

552
00:55:32,872 --> 00:55:34,231
Don't surrender that easily.

553
00:55:35,012 --> 00:55:35,572
Yeah.

554
00:55:37,512 --> 00:55:47,132
One thing I do find is one of the best things in this kind of twisted way to steer people towards freedom tech is politics.

555
00:55:47,711 --> 00:55:52,512
And I've kind of told this story on another podcast before, but I'll retell it here.

556
00:55:52,671 --> 00:56:01,191
One of my favorite, you know, things about like privacy tech is that our opinions about privacy tech in the U.S. totally depend on who's president.

557
00:56:02,691 --> 00:56:10,992
And like, like, I remember like, OK, being like in high school and like George W. Bush was president.

558
00:56:11,711 --> 00:56:17,132
You know, everyone was still kind of sore about the oh, crap, the name is blanking on me.

559
00:56:17,132 --> 00:56:20,791
But the the act Congress passed right after 9-11.

560
00:56:20,791 --> 00:56:21,791
Right, right.

561
00:56:22,671 --> 00:56:40,751
But, you know, anyways, basically, there was, you know, all these controversies in the 2000s over like, you know, is the government doing warrantless wiretaps? You know, what sorts of powers does the federal government have now to combat terrorism? Can that be deployed against, you know, U.S. citizens?

562
00:56:40,751 --> 00:56:50,231
And the privacy narrative I was hearing in that time in the 2000s was totally about it was totally coming from the left in the U.S.

563
00:56:50,352 --> 00:56:57,352
It was a it was a democratic center left idea that, like, maybe we should be more private.

564
00:56:57,492 --> 00:57:00,512
Maybe we should be more concerned about the government's intrusion in our lives.

565
00:57:00,671 --> 00:57:05,892
And, you know, the center right perspective was, no, we need to combat terrorism because terrorists suck.

566
00:57:05,892 --> 00:57:33,632
I think they're both valid viewpoints. But my point is, and I mean, certainly everyone has different individual takes. But during that time, it was privacy was I heard coming more center left. Then, you know, Obama gets elected. And then the scandal like the Snowden, you know, scandal and all that. And then everyone on the right is suddenly more like this happened under Obama's watch. You know, we have this federal, you know, you know, federal apparatus, you know, surveilling our ever move.

567
00:57:33,632 --> 00:57:36,532
And everyone on the left was like, no, you can't critique Obama.

568
00:57:37,852 --> 00:57:40,671
Never let a good crisis go to waste, I think is the.

569
00:57:40,791 --> 00:57:47,291
Exactly. Then Trump gets elected the first time and suddenly everyone's like, oh, my God, we need to get journalists using signal.

570
00:57:47,392 --> 00:57:56,171
We need everyone using signal so that people can exfiltrate information from the White House and, you know, bring down the fascist hierarchy or whatever.

571
00:57:56,171 --> 00:58:03,432
then uh suddenly you know january 6th happens and then you know all of a sudden everyone on the right

572
00:58:03,432 --> 00:58:09,671
and like every republican in my life is just like steven how do i get on signal so that like you know

573
00:58:09,671 --> 00:58:15,552
i don't want to get banned i don't want whatever it takes i'm like dog dog chill and now we're right

574
00:58:15,552 --> 00:58:19,872
back i mean the pendulum like it's so this pendulum just totally swing my and i don't mean to make fun

575
00:58:19,872 --> 00:58:27,532
of anybody for their politics here. My point is just that like privacy is a concern no matter

576
00:58:27,532 --> 00:58:32,751
who is in office. It is a political or all political if you wish to view it that way.

577
00:58:33,452 --> 00:58:37,671
Yeah. And everything is political. But what I mean is privacy shouldn't be seen as a partisan.

578
00:58:38,072 --> 00:58:42,872
It shouldn't be seen as part because politics, politics is who gets what. Yes. But partisan

579
00:58:42,872 --> 00:58:48,652
is like, you know, which party are you aligned with? And privacy doesn't need to be a partisan

580
00:58:48,652 --> 00:58:54,771
idea. You're always at risk of having your privacy breached. It's just that how we feel about privacy

581
00:58:54,771 --> 00:59:01,671
depends on who is the president in the U.S. at least. And I don't really know how to shake that

582
00:59:01,671 --> 00:59:06,612
belief in people. But the useful thing is, is that every four years as the pendulum swings,

583
00:59:06,612 --> 00:59:12,572
we get a new crop of people interested in privacy tech. So, you know, that's what I mean. It's like,

584
00:59:12,572 --> 00:59:18,652
It's not a catastrophic crisis, but in their mind, politically, it's a partisan crisis to them.

585
00:59:18,731 --> 00:59:20,971
And so it kind of stirs their interest.

586
00:59:21,171 --> 00:59:26,072
So maybe as more as the pendulum, pendulum swifts, more and more people become interested in privacy.

587
00:59:26,072 --> 00:59:33,191
And as more and more people become interested, the products become hopefully easier to use and less evil.

588
00:59:33,372 --> 00:59:35,152
So that's kind of my optimistic take on it.

589
00:59:35,811 --> 00:59:36,392
I love it.

590
00:59:37,632 --> 00:59:40,311
Let's let's with all of that wrap up here, Stephen.

591
00:59:40,652 --> 00:59:41,771
Uncomfortable question.

592
00:59:42,572 --> 00:59:52,092
What if most people prefer beautiful surveillance over ugly freedom, you know, and not to cast all freedom tech in that vein?

593
00:59:52,092 --> 01:00:02,392
But if it's the perspective is sort of on that on that two or almost two poles, if that's true, like what what are we building for?

594
01:00:02,471 --> 01:00:09,872
Is it the one percent who care or do you think we've got a shot at broader adoption of freedom tech?

595
01:00:09,872 --> 01:00:25,211
I think that there's definitely a trend where people just want the, as you put it, the beautiful surveillance over the ugly freedom, but it doesn't have to be that way.

596
01:00:27,352 --> 01:00:34,452
I think Freedom Tech products can be beautiful in terms of having beautiful interfaces.

597
01:00:34,452 --> 01:00:43,092
uh part of that is you know helping you know projects you know helping freedom tech projects

598
01:00:43,092 --> 01:00:47,811
to care about like kind of having beautiful interfaces part of it is getting designers

599
01:00:47,811 --> 01:00:55,152
interested in working on these projects uh which is always the challenge but um that's that's one

600
01:00:55,152 --> 01:01:03,052
part of the equation i think though that it can also be kind of a trojan horse type of scenario

601
01:01:03,052 --> 01:01:09,632
where if you build a product that's useful for other means,

602
01:01:09,992 --> 01:01:17,291
then you can work these FreedomTech things in there in meaningful ways.

603
01:01:18,132 --> 01:01:23,231
So, for example, what Square is doing with Bitcoin support,

604
01:01:23,632 --> 01:01:27,072
well, it's custodial, but they're onboarding a ton of merchants

605
01:01:27,072 --> 01:01:28,912
and that opens the door for merchants.

606
01:01:29,652 --> 01:01:31,191
Yeah, it opens the door.

607
01:01:31,191 --> 01:01:37,731
um you know stuff like signal and proton makes privacy more accessible um i think you know

608
01:01:37,731 --> 01:01:45,512
the more the more products we we have that try to work this stuff in here the better and i guess

609
01:01:45,512 --> 01:01:53,932
this would really be a good place to highlight that i don't i i've heard people kind of like a

610
01:01:53,932 --> 01:01:57,612
lot of people like think of me as like okay i'm a product designer i i really try to think of

611
01:01:57,612 --> 01:02:04,152
myself these days is more as like, I'm a Bitcoin UX guy. I like to think about these things,

612
01:02:04,152 --> 01:02:07,791
not just from a design perspective, but also from an engineering perspective,

613
01:02:07,791 --> 01:02:14,412
because I think that good user experience is not just a design problem. I think that user

614
01:02:14,412 --> 01:02:20,012
experience is, you know, it's a problem to solve. Some UX problems have design solutions and some

615
01:02:20,012 --> 01:02:26,331
have engineering problems. Great point. Some have engineering solutions. And so like,

616
01:02:26,331 --> 01:02:36,412
Sometimes it's just about like working until we have the optimal engineering solution to make this stuff easier to use.

617
01:02:36,412 --> 01:02:44,112
I mean, definitely all the work around like with like secure enclaves and stuff like that is a great start.

618
01:02:45,512 --> 01:02:49,492
So there's design solutions, there's engineering solutions.

619
01:02:49,952 --> 01:02:53,052
It's not always just about like making the interface more beautiful to use.

620
01:02:53,052 --> 01:02:59,092
It was like, for example, you shared with me, you know, some of like your Nostra UX research that you were doing.

621
01:02:59,092 --> 01:03:05,811
And I liked that, you know, what you had in that document was not just, oh, it doesn't look pretty enough.

622
01:03:05,952 --> 01:03:08,751
It was that you're actually going into like under the hood.

623
01:03:09,191 --> 01:03:22,392
The problem with some of these Nostra products is that they're, you know, you know, from an engineering perspective, they're like, like you had a page on there just about they're like waiting to display a list of results.

624
01:03:22,392 --> 01:03:24,652
until they've queried every relay in their stack.

625
01:03:25,072 --> 01:03:26,152
That's an engineering problem.

626
01:03:26,452 --> 01:03:27,012
Right, absolutely.

627
01:03:28,592 --> 01:03:35,171
So we have to get more FreedomTech people interested in product,

628
01:03:35,452 --> 01:03:39,691
and we have to get more product people interested in FreedomTech.

629
01:03:39,691 --> 01:03:44,791
But I'm overall optimistic that we can work FreedomTech

630
01:03:44,791 --> 01:03:48,471
into every aspect of people's lives in a way that,

631
01:03:48,612 --> 01:03:51,012
even if they don't know that it's there, it benefits them.

632
01:03:51,012 --> 01:03:57,392
LFG. That is fantastic. That is the place to put it. Thank you so much, Stephen. Really appreciate

633
01:03:57,392 --> 01:04:02,231
it. And I do want to thank you specifically for all the work you do. Bitcoin Design Guide,

634
01:04:02,352 --> 01:04:09,671
the community that you, I know, at least co-lead, if not initiated in Discord and elsewhere. These

635
01:04:09,671 --> 01:04:13,912
are really important initiatives, great contributions. So thank you for that. Thanks

636
01:04:13,912 --> 01:04:18,271
for the time today. Well, I want to go ahead and actually on that point, thank you. And I want to

637
01:04:18,271 --> 01:04:23,191
go ahead and clear something. So I did not start Bitcoin design. It was actually, it was, you know,

638
01:04:23,251 --> 01:04:28,251
a group of designers on the internet who started it actually before me. I think, you know, Daniel

639
01:04:28,251 --> 01:04:33,251
Nord and Christoph Ono were some of the earliest ones there. Now the kind of community is kind of

640
01:04:33,251 --> 01:04:39,392
led mostly by Christoph and Mageshny. So unfortunately, I don't, you know, contribute

641
01:04:39,392 --> 01:04:46,811
to the design community as much as I used to did. But, you know, I'm kind of getting back into the

642
01:04:46,811 --> 01:04:50,971
swing of things a little bit. We have a project at Voltage now called the Bitcoin Builder Kit,

643
01:04:51,452 --> 01:04:55,932
where we're trying to kind of componentize. It's an open source project we're kind of doing in

644
01:04:55,932 --> 01:05:02,552
public in the design community, where we're trying to kind of, you know, componentize some aspects of

645
01:05:02,552 --> 01:05:08,291
Bitcoin UX so that other product teams can use this stuff and also make it easier for AIs to

646
01:05:08,291 --> 01:05:12,012
consume some of this stuff. Very interesting. But yeah, anyways, I just wanted to make sure

647
01:05:12,012 --> 01:05:15,992
we get credit where it's due there. Please, thanks for the correction and thanks to the other team

648
01:05:15,992 --> 01:05:23,592
members and I will look forward to checking that out. Yeah. Common misconception because I'm one of

649
01:05:23,592 --> 01:05:29,092
the Bitcoin designers in the U.S. and so I end up at conferences more. Right, right. You're the face

650
01:05:29,092 --> 01:05:35,912
or a face. Yeah. At least in the U.S. I ended up several years ago being like the face, but

651
01:05:35,912 --> 01:05:40,132
it's like a whole global initiative. It is. Yes. And thank you for that. And it's important. And I

652
01:05:40,132 --> 01:05:45,211
think, you know, it's a good cautionary note that we don't assume that all of this stuff just

653
01:05:45,211 --> 01:05:46,132
to happen stateside.

654
01:05:47,211 --> 01:05:48,331
Well, thanks again, Stephen.

655
01:05:48,372 --> 01:05:49,592
I'll get all those links out

656
01:05:49,592 --> 01:05:50,711
so people who are interested

657
01:05:50,711 --> 01:05:51,452
can dig in.

658
01:05:51,492 --> 01:05:52,432
And I think you have left,

659
01:05:52,912 --> 01:05:54,112
you know, from an engineer,

660
01:05:54,392 --> 01:05:55,311
a product designer

661
01:05:55,311 --> 01:05:56,152
to an individual

662
01:05:56,152 --> 01:05:57,632
who just wants to pay,

663
01:05:58,092 --> 01:05:59,092
as you say, you know,

664
01:05:59,112 --> 01:06:00,331
the barista for their coffee.

665
01:06:00,432 --> 01:06:01,691
There's a lot to take away here

666
01:06:01,691 --> 01:06:02,912
and I appreciate it.

667
01:06:03,052 --> 01:06:04,012
Hope to catch up

668
01:06:04,012 --> 01:06:04,992
and talk with you soon, Stephen.

669
01:06:05,072 --> 01:06:05,652
Thanks so much.

670
01:06:06,711 --> 01:06:07,632
Yeah, thanks so much, Sean.

671
01:06:07,671 --> 01:06:08,112
It's been fun.

672
01:06:08,112 --> 01:06:09,032
Bye-bye.

673
01:06:15,211 --> 01:06:27,572
Thank you.