Music.
Welcome back to Unlimited
Webb in the last episode, we
discuss the outside influence of
fiscal policy, especially during
is completely unaffected by
power. In that discussion, we
unlikely to change anytime soon,
Blackrock veterans and Trump
rein to Blackrock Larry Fink
manager, to essentially design
response during the COVID 19
wanton money printing. Such
reflected by Fink himself, who
Times earlier this week as
matter. End quote, for financial
quote, I'm tired of hearing.
your lifetime. The reality is,
work with both administrations
with both candidates. End quote,
surprisingly honest admission
election cycle. This year, it
so many people who previously
paradigm, especially during
one of the two parties is once
the worst of the two evils from
reminding people that both
them the repeated patterns all
party wins the White House or
angry rebuttals of how such
offer no hope. I would argue
hopium, the political drug that
political spectacle, while the
funds both parties continue to
using our money to finance
build a digital prison that will
livestock from the ranchers,
pilling and offering no hope or
our political reality is nothing
key requisite to actually
we believe that the only
world is ensuring that that one
party doesn't get back in the
problems will be focused around
the candidate who says the thing
ultimately offer the same
whose real differences are
pitches for those same policies.
choosing directly. It is an
person in the right place will
the world of its ills. But while
lie and will do nothing more
the deceivers who have largely
face. Joining me to discuss
Corbett of The Corbett Report.
to my audience, is an award
who has hosted the corporate
produced documentaries, podcasts
He is a true veteran of the
has remained consistent in his
decades, and is, at least in my
continue to trust the most for
analysis of current events.
the unlimited hangout podcast,
him back. Great to have you back
things with you? Things
are wonderful. Thank you for
be on the program once again to
things. I don't know if you
getting crazier and crazier. So
Yeah, and it seems like some
Because, you know, election
without, you know, fervor of,
of political party in their
excited and also very agitated
come. Isn't that fun? So is
iteration of us, the US,
spectacle, that you find unique
time, I would
not use the word unique to
you're described, that you're
mean, the only thing that truly
I every time kind of gobsmacks
there can be no possible way to
booth, yet again, to leave their
suggestion box, there is always,
spin on it that makes it the
of your lifetime, this selection
constantly amazed at the way
narratives that puts spin on
all their life and received
from. Have seen no genuine
their life, but they will
really the only surprising thing
find different ways of reframing
same narrative. You get to
master will lead over you, or at
installed in the Oval Office as
happened this year, as it has
apparently, mostly were unaware
who's sitting in the Oval
anything. He's not really home.
actually running things? Wow, I
back to the voting booth and
placed in the Oval Office.
what has happened this year,
here we are yet again. So that
magic trick is to get people to
meaningless selection processes.
think that's that's the
actually not participate, that's
think they've done their best to
situations and aspects of the
people entertained enough, or
like that, to keep people or to,
have left the fold during COVID,
that, sort of back in. And I
that of why this may be is
media, and also like independent
this collapse of mainstream
public, and how a lot of these
media now or that aren't
mainstream, but were and are
people like, you know, Tucker
of the importance of over fact,
that have been going on in this
that feeds sort of the hopium
written a lot about. So I don't
you know why this? Some of the
have allowed people to be sucked
you know, as you noted,
no matter what happens?
Yes, I do have some thoughts
may or may not know, I've looked
and its development over the
that, to me, really is one of
political, cultural, social
like fish not realizing that
don't realize that we are
a mediated age like the one
an almost structural level, the
has been the disintegration of
which was the creation of a
we can all go back to our
childhood, to remember there
when everyone knew the the big
now. Everyone saw the big sports
Everybody saw that that episode
whatever it was, and everyone
been noted time and time again,
disintegrating as people have
are now in their little bubbles.
uniting shared spectacle that
everyone back to the table is
there really is an overlap
and politics that is undeniable
used to joke about Ronald Reagan
being in positions of political
mean, the parody of that even.
star Donald Trump lining up to
It's I just find that
has become the spectacle again,
mainstream alternative media
past, certainly over the past
and interestingly consolidated
like rumble, which I know, you
people like Peter Thiel. So it
same individuals. Yes,
it was also taken public by
Fitzgerald, and he is a very
Jeffrey Epstein's neighbor, and
quoted in, I forget what
newspaper, saying, I can't wait
floor with E speed. And then on
death count is Cantor
interesting guy. One of
I just find it interesting that
increasingly Twitter slash x
for a lot of these mainstream
have made their their their bona
by being in some way taken off
platforms, in some way
cry. Well, we've been censored,
true and hey, you can catch us
have you, which is an
you also raise the specter of
incredibly important part of
spectacle and the function that
the 21st century, and for people
concept I am I certainly
coined that term, but I do think
uptick in use of that term Since
several years ago, back when I
remember correctly. So the
thing called Hope, which is a
the human experience that we do
the future that will compel us
out, doing new things, trying,
extend ourselves. That is hope,
is part of the human experience,
unfortunately, the political
hopium, which is the synthetic
which in the exact same way
give people the simulacrum of
happiness, and once that starts
bigger fix, and they will
lives. I think similarly, the
simulacrum of actual action in
have to actually do anything.
or create anything. You just
button, you vote for a
action in the world. And then
couple of years. And that,
of hopium, and unfortunately, it
the episode that I did, I framed
phenomenon, which, as people may
key messages of Q anon was, sit
of course, exactly it is a
meant to be in the audience,
watching things unfold. And if
position, you will be absolutely
status quo.
You know, what's interesting
something like Bitcoin, for
issue. The same ideology that
behind Q Anon, sort of like, sit
being promoted to Bitcoiners,
Fink and Wall Street have their
whatever administration with
makes it serve the state and
financial freedom and what have
horse, and it's so great and
on to it and do absolutely
absolutely nothing to ensure
you want it to be, and let it be
Trojan horse the whole system
think and destroy the bankers
interesting to see how that
propagate that mentality are
spread well beyond the Q anon
think it's interesting as it
cycle, at least, that it seems
previous ones. There has been an
and people sort of of that
And it's been, I think I'd
this election really picked up
kind of started with Javier
that, Oh, a libertarians and
all of these things. But really,
far doesn't necessarily line up
putting JP Morgan bankers that
know, debt slavery model for
the economy, among other things.
about that? Because I know that
you're a voluntary you subscribe
there have you've definitely
circles, so I'm curious about
Yes, well, I guess it really
definition of libertarian, but
understand does not have
often put under that rubric, or
the prime example of that is,
know if, if gates is most
himself into a philanthropist
through the wonderful efforts of
Peter thiel's greatest PR
branded as a libertarian and to
calling call him that for the
all of his maneuvers have been
opposite direction of anything
example, absolutely obviously,
his fortune directly, actively
setting up surveillance and
against the public, which he
leverage into political power
JD Vance, he was an important
team, and I had his own office
installed in the in the White
steering committee member of
don't know what universe you
is the libertarian, but that is,
applied. So I think anytime
around as a pejorative, I would
some sort of definition on the
different people will have
is no definition I can imagine
that label.
Well, it's truly astounding,
supposedly one of the
ideology is the importance of
is on record saying that free
losers, and that you should find
a monopoly. And when he's tried
monopoly directly with, as you
security agencies overtly with
know, PayPal co founder Max
that when they were creating
letter agency that would talk to
business. So, you know, I think
well, and that's certainly not a
think there's also an effort in
these other people to sort of
it really be what, you know, I
done is corporatism, and his
says, as someone who just
successful capitalists or, you
everything. And obviously
not equitable, you know. And so
capitalist sounds a lot like Neo
style, corporatism, which, you
not libertarianism. He's
drinking the state. So speaking
of Mussolini, it was one of
Perrito, who, well at any rate,
Mussolini to move away from
mindset, who seems to have been
21st century by poli sci 101
his theory of the circulation of
that. And essentially, Pareto
organization of society. He He
elites and non elites, and he
meritocratic terms, there are
will achieve more in their life,
elites. And there are governing
And he was specifically
so people who were in positions
above average in competence and
And these people are essentially
but there will be, there will be
class, and some will be more
general public, and some will be
appeasing their own appetites at
so essentially, it is the
and to throw their support
choice is to get to choose which
support, and from that well, we
people surrounding him are,
on the. People's side and the
there. Or flip it if you happen
it's the good elites on the
whatever you want to say about
sociological idea that is being
to bring people back into that
spectacle.
Yes, and it's interesting
point, began to circulate, the
over the terrible lefty elites
like Mark Zuckerberg. I don't
attempted to rebrand as a
hair a little bit. Said, Trump
after the first assassination as
to go with it and all of that.
of these Silicon Valley
libertarian. That was the
Valley, which we know, of
was founded through military and
what it was. It was an adjunct
But the mythos that were fed is
barefoot sandal wearing hippie
Garage tinkerers libertarian in
they were the techno
tech, technology would free us
democracy and all of that
that. And I think Zuckerberg is
that. But Zuckerberg mentally a
mean, obviously teal,
was the founding angel investor
into what it was. And Zuckerberg
always listened to him. And I
some sort of proxy for for teal
absolutely, we could go back,
2016 in which Zuckerberg, for
a bunch of right wing media
say, you know, look, Facebook
conservatives. We'll talk to
our algorithms to make it better
then suddenly you get daily wire
what's interesting is that,
election, he was kind of a
that dealverse is sort of about
power. He's He's rebranded this
if it actually works on Trump's
such, as we've noted earlier, a
than perhaps we had anticipated
you know, discussed at the two
throughout the world on things
related to global technocracy.
Zuckerberg and we've talked a
not so much about musk, I own
cycles, particularly because
by musk, who is very overtly
and has particular ambitions for
turn Twitter, or x, as it's now
essentially will quote, unquote,
human behavioral data farm that
know, some of the I think it's
you know, the mainstream
referred to it earlier, some of
have sort of become dependent on
algorithm and sort of doing
to get more clicks and views and
the musk slash dark Maga
the side of of Ryan Christian,
think Musk is laughing at the
believe this act that he seems
I think it is a political act
Keep in mind, this is the same
advisory committees back in 2000
Trump ended the Paris Accords.
who's, of course, was a darling
now suddenly rebranded and is
don't trust him. As far as I
couldn't throw him that far.
you will. I think Musk is in it
and I think that's what he's
that Twitter has as you be, as
in which you have to act and.
order to tickle Musk's fancy in
way, so that he can help
not crack down on your
of crackdown, I think that could
For example, one could well
predominant narrative that that
God, you know, Facebook and
election. One could imagine a
look at this rampant chaos on
divide in our society. And if
could imagine that would be the
justification of further
internet generally. So there's a
out. And I don't know what game
but I, as I say, I don't think I
had some sort of political
years. I think he's just playing
convenient to him. And as again,
just JD Vance. Isn't just a
Musk made his support of the
Vance being the VP pick as well.
riff there is between teal and
much at the end of the day, as
same puppets. Well,
I think they're, you know,
teal and the network of people
like Palmer lucky and anderil
meant to be sort of the next
know, military intelligence
you know Musk is now with
that. But then you have, you
by Thiel and Palmer. Lucky, he
He's very close to Peter Thiel
that Trump supports over a
previously, before the 2016
policy suggestion for securing
What do you know? And I think
that's been being circulated
that's popular, popular with
Prince has sort of rebranded and
establishment figure now, even
death squad leader or was and he
you know, Raytheon and all of
inefficient and waste a lot of
idea is essentially to use AI
powered companies, like defense
to teal or or Musk to do that
doesn't overtly say that, but
being made, right? The argument
we're the answer to Raytheon,
this was one of the one of
happened in 2016 the 2016
sure you're well familiar with
role, was able to implant, for
former Palantir staffers and
Pentagon, for example, Chief of
advisors to the then defense
Palantir, and of course, it was
that the Pentagon finally
Palantir had been putting
point, to have open contract
believe, were formerly locked
they wanted an open, open
that. And of course, Palantir
contract of their entire company
Pentagon as a direct result of
sure, just with all of the ex
around the Pentagon. And so yes,
supplant the old military
it with the sort of the teal
definitely one of the reasons I
heavy investment in this
verse.
Yes, I think it's
argument is not no is no longer
wars, or no more wasting
taxpayer money more efficiently
faster. It's essentially what
fact, and there's even been
charge of the Pentagon. I mean,
a point where that can be
laugh, yeah,
well, I want to laugh
accept that that will happen.
just touched on one of the most
think, quite clearly expose the
political spectacle that is
not change people's lives
exactly right. The the 2016
talking about, you know, ending
course, was instantly replaced
NATO is great. We're supporting
that, but more so the the old
we don't need wars of foreign
been completely and utterly
example of that is, of course,
the, show me the presidential
against Israel, and is going to,
Israel military relationship of
only real difference is who will
contracts to help supply the
genocide in Gaza. And that's the
know it's going to be lavender,
think it's going to be
the Director of National
intelligence official in the
Haines, is, was a long time
there you go. Before definitely
you know, that's obviously very
yes, every candidate, including
candidates that have now, you
now endorsed Trump, um, have
essentially, um, you know, let's
Palestine in the Palestinians.
competition, basically, with who
Iran first and allow the US to
reason, there's people that
and all of this, but are seem to
one of the main tenets of Neo
one, is to align US foreign
policy or regional policy goals,
which, let's not forget, is
construction of a state that has
but formulated, for example, in
documents from the 1980s that
things as the overthrow of
would eventually lead to
Syria and Lebanon and Iran, oh,
over the past couple of decades.
course, this is a plan, and
one is even hinting at the idea
broach the subject of perhaps
whether the US should be
even willing to put that on the
Yeah, and it's kind of mind
you are to say publicly, for
for either of the war criminals
that you know, you're terrible,
maybe it's just Twitter, I don't
with, you know, Musk running it
he's also been made it very
Israel is doing. But, you know,
you know, well, I don't know if
a few years ago, when I worked
op ed called during the early
called the US has become a
basically talked about how,
also protests about like Occupy
the there's been a massive
the population and make us
agenda. And I don't know, it
the ultimate end goal, perhaps.
left cheering for it, you know,
get Putin and then you have
essentially, war with Iran.
strike Iran? Because Hezbollah
practically eliminated, blah,
boggling how successful of a
the idea that, like, oh, Dick
that means that's the neocon
in the other party. I mean, it's
going around are truly mind
is also related to this effort
of what the quote, unquote, Deep
So for example, on the left, it
just means, oh, anyone that uses
qtard and all of these things.
seriously, the fact that they're
course, the deep, deep the term
unelected bureaucracy, the
policy to continue no matter
But to the right, it seems like
officials of the other party. So
Kamala Harris are the deep
prevent them from coming back,
of this stuff. So I'm curious
this successful effort to
different names. I guess perhaps
libertarian, maybe. Or, you
efforts to sort of weaponize the
it's a good point. I think
the head. Because, yes, I think
the political spectrum, anyone
state, and to the people on the
deep state, you're you're a
polite society. However, I will
to that, which is I, for
editorial on Deep State rising,
government, where I noted the
Specifically, it was January of
blip on the political radar,
of this mainstream media
had books, Deep State inside the
and the deep state, the fall of
a shadow government, you had
known for its, you know, right
well as outlets like the
talked about by mainstream
Bill Moyers had a guest on
Deep State. The Boston Globe was
government that won't change no
York Times was talking about
embraced the deep state. The
talking about, it was a bizarre
the time, I was just pondering,
Why are they bringing this, this
at this particular time.
has actually studied this issue,
person who spearheaded the
phenomenon, deep politics in the
Peter Dale Scott who had
Turkish, where there there was
that exposed the Turkish Deep
was really originating from. But
power between military and
runners and all of that, and so
and deep state that people like
researching and writing about
for decades. And so suddenly, in
emerge into mainstream talking
interestingly, as Trump took
shouldn't even say that. It's a
Trump sat in the Oval Office.
to emerge. Yes, there is a deep
everyday bureaucrats and workers
agencies. And don't worry, guys,
op eds and editorials being
newspapers about Yes, the deep
thing, because these are the
go crazy. They're not going to
and whatever Trump tells them to
in charge. So don't worry about
became to the extent that the
I think that is the way that
don't worry the deep state is
staffers who sit there at their
for people who have actually
Scott and people like that,
politics of heroin and things
connection between intelligence,
mobsters, government officials.
Obviously, I mean, this
has been about, this is
it all goes back to the
same nexus of power. Because
look at it, we start to
spectacle is a spectacle that is
I've, I've made the analogy a
the galaxy or the president of
Guide to the Galaxy, Zaphod
ridiculous character who, in the
literally just meant to
attention from the people who
that they can get along with the
ruling the galaxy, while this
everyone in the galaxy is
do think that that is
where the person in the Oval
the Oval Office, that that is
our attention from the people
still largely in the shadows,
has in some way been mainstream,
yeah, well, I think it's
extent too, but I don't know.
some of the political psyops
turn to something that I think
opposed to the other party, in
it is related to efforts to
anti establishment, when, of
even his what the policy, the
campaigns on show is inaccurate.
phenomena of canceling, right?
few years. And this idea of like
been an effort to use quote,
basically controlled assets that
makes me think of sort of the
meetings. And in the wake of
couple years in a row. Actually,
with the public, and it seems
with the with, you know, right
course, have the guns, have been
sort of pacify them and have
Trump is the person who's going
that the people that are armed,
armchairs and stay docile. And I
know, basically, by, by sort of
that, oh, the deep state, or
people, hate Trump, Bill Gates,
much. You know, people like
Q anon have sort of absolved
either held account to any of
having to campaign on policy at
don't you see these people hate
much? You know, obviously he's
necessarily right, like, if
for example, and you know, you
establishment and get quote,
Americans to trust them, just
big canceling events, you know.
need to meet. It's actually a
I certainly, yeah, I
would be smart enough to even
absolutely agree that that is
the the over the top,
phenomenon and What? What? Is
here's the rogue Maverick that
can't be said, and we can't
gets, if he gets into power, oh,
deep state. Uh oh, he's gonna,
border wall with the digital ID.
know, he'll bring the
good kind, not that. Cbdc, scary
etc, etc, yeah,
it'll be the private sector,
not the public. It'll be
from Bank of America. You
no, that's, that's exactly the
happen from the deep state's
they would like the public to
agenda, and to think, well, it's
out there to destroy the system.
can play out, for example, I
Facebook meeting, back in I
we're listening. We're not
boosting conservatives. And
wire start get to get boosted in
precisely because they know
within, at least within the
may be on the right side of that
certainly not going to be
anything, you know, anything
that would truly be a threat to
shouldn't be so similarly,
honestly, I couldn't imagine
enough to be able to play a role
know that he is going to be
and that he can be easily led
had four years of him being
exactly that and how he was led
opportunity and warp speed and
took place under Trump. Do you
have forgotten it because they
is playing more so than the
that that really is, that's it.
they tend to kind of absolve
was in power. Last time, oh, it
then later they left power and
that. He won't make those
time, even though Howard lutnic
I was gonna say two words.
the Oval Office again. So,
yeah, well, if not overtly,
but I think you know, this
anti establishment credentials
doing thing, anti establishment
overdrive this year with the the
that has sort of impacted Trump
Because there was a before they
would say, lack of enthusiasm
completely unenthusiastic, but
enthusiastic after the first
there were a couple more minor,
of that first one, and people
know, quote, unquote
true for, you know, any sort of
generally, the official
test, but I haven't personally
opine on the specifics of those,
of them has been pretty
thoughts on that, because that's
previous cycles, I think some
something that people think,
it's certainly an upping of
the spectacle side of it. What
spectacular than the site of an
rate, if not an assassination
about the chess moves involved
seem like absolutely this was a
Secret Service had been doing
protocol, obviously, what we saw
happened at all, obviously. So
made to allowed to engineer to
what would have been the result
proceeded and Trump was actually
know the calculus on that one,
calculus from the incredible
almost being assassinated and
fight, fight with the iconic
obviously, to burnish it
of burnishing credentials with
the maverick who's literally
team. This is the man they're
support him even harder. Because
from the assassination of JFK,
once you've been assassinated,
can, I can say that with some
have attempted to set the record
that actually, you know, JFK was
Reserve. In fact, he was
the Federal Reserve more power
the silver certificates that
certain prescribed intervals.
over so that could be ended,
this, gone through the specific
he's actually written, and I
people who, no, you don't
earth. He was being assassinated
deep state. Well, I certainly do
connection between what was
example, or his threat to
pieces. That doesn't mean
good. Certainly not, yeah,
he was very blackmailed, had
people knew about it. His vice
wazoo. LBJ, who later becomes
course, you know, the Kennedy
same networks that really, you
my book of, you know, organize
crime people that became
Prohibition era because of
intelligence agencies. The, you
of the Kennedys was bootlegging
networks, and, you know,
activity that helped make his
financially and politically
the ease of, sort of, at least
controlling JFK through sex and
which already, you know, at that
well established by this
least a few decades in of their,
to control powerful people. You
effort to sort of. Sanctify
an extent, also, you know RFK as
cleaner than than JFK on things
that. I'm not sure I would say,
why are they shared? But
apparently, not as bad,
playing around with multiple
eyeballs deep in the operations
that, of course, Operation
ultimately had some part to play
I think that's obviously is
whole story that is really not
intimately involved in plans for
and others. And although JFK,
Operation Northwoods, RFK was
various operations in Cuba.
the story. RFK was not a clean
definitely not. I mean,
really ever has been, arguably.
particularly apparent as well
interesting about what we've
these assassination attempts,
think it's sort of related to, I
of mainstream, at least, within
been qanon Talking Points or
Kennedy, the Kennedy clan and
definitely been a key part of
JFK Jr is JFK
Jr still actually Q. Is that
Well, there's, I think
Q, you know, I
remember that JFK Jr is
present himself at some rally,
Plaza. And there was a crowd
waiting for resurrected JFK, Jr,
lead them to victory, something
idea of the Kennedy mythos there
think you know the idea of, you
attempts, of course, the last
that was assassinated, you know,
correctly, and it sort of links
Kennedys. And then you have RFK
comparisons about Trump to, you
things like that. And I sort of
an effort to sort of mainstream
I say this not just because of
because of sort of these figures
example. You know, now that he's
of given air time to what would
on his show at all, what are
and not necessarily inaccurate,
weaponized by key went on, in a
example, of, you know,
like that, absolutely a real
Carlson had like Roseanne Barr
like the Democrats are all pedos
it's obviously not exclusive to
sort of that out, which had
years ago, been seen as a sort
when the Podesta leaks and all
of came out to sort of grab
by some of those related
Tucker's response is just sort
laugh, you know? So I think it's
know, Tucker saying, like, oh
us, but they're really demons,
all of this stuff. I mean, can
when he was on Fox? I don't
his rebound at all, as I
been funded by Peter Thiel,
sorry, the
name, the term rebrand
sudden Christianity conversion
well, it's related. Well,
Brand ended up leading him to
which, lo and behold, is funded
of people in Rumble World,
interesting. Well, okay,
assassination topic, there's
just occurred to me. One of the
used, of course, is like the the
attempt on Reagan, which was
air by May Brussel. May Brussel,
24 hours in advance. There's it
coup taking place in the Reagan
Alexander Haig and Vice
something. And then, lo and
ends up shooting Reagan, well
actually, right after having
the Bucha, yeah, there was,
connections there. And, in fact,
interesting analysis that I
actually, it wasn't Hinckley
Anyway, like, as you say, like
event in American politics, that
well. But what was the real
that on the Dale on the day who
charge of the US government was
enough, he just assumed charge
when Reagan was out of office.
Of course, it was the threat to
charge here. And Bush from that
presidency. He was running the
VP, absolutely. And I think
phrase, the phrase we always use
presidency, the VP, right? And
would that be? Of course, it
think there might have been a
assassination attempts? Hey, you
your Secret Service protection.
a hurry. Can it so you better
should really give vanderel
Exactly, right?
Yeah, something like that.
Yeah, interesting. Well, I
assassination attempt, Eric
security stuff for the Trump
influential he ultimately ends
up winning, which I honestly
given where they want to take
seem to be very unaware that
agree on so many policy issues
digital ID. Trump is on record
Exit tracking system in the
solution to mass migration,
Tories in the UK did recently.
solution to illegal immigration,
government, and they're pitching
online hate speech and cyber
there's a lot of cross
US and UK policy. And it seems
quote, unquote, I shouldn't
The Democrats, they're talking
rather similar to labors as
solutions the same. You know,
differ, and also market based
I mentioned earlier, Howard
choosing the talent, he said,
one of the earliest pioneers of
the late 90s, and has been very
carbon markets, including with
of called satologic, which is
Treasury Secretary Steve
is Joe Dunford, who was head of
Trump, so basically head of the
purposes and satologic has been
for the Americas on the Bitcoin
you're getting it sort of from
as the left. And really, you
emissions trading was created by
Drexel Burnham Lambert being the
bank, and it was Michael Milken
that fueled all these corporate
corporate America and had a lot
crisis, which, of course,
CIA networks and what have you,
anyway, that Drexel Burnham
Sandor, he created Emissions
of Bucha senior, and was also
first Rio Summit in like 92 or
based solution for quote,
creating some sort of, you know,
previously invented basically
few years prior. So it's really
framed as a left wing thing,
know, came out of the other side
despite a lot of divide about,
is real or not, between the left
essentially the same right as is
and surveillance money with you
Elizabeth. Warren, for example,
time for a cbdc, and then, you
embracing not just Bitcoin, but
is intimately connected to the
stable coin called tether. He's
treasuries, and that's now a
It's all very crazy. So tether
way, with the FBI and Secret
platform, and they seize
governments like Israel and the
live in the US. So it's really
system. It's really just as
And, you know, there's infinite
being biotech as well. I'm
that, because I know you've
rightly so, GMOs for a long
office, previously, he
extensively, and, of course,
what was a GMO vaccine and mRNA
speed. And a lot of his backers,
Vance himself, are very invested
you have someone like RFK Jr,
over the last few years railing
agriculture or in vaccines. Now,
idea that a vote for Trump will
and things of that nature. So
your thoughts on that matter.
Yes, it's an incredibly
be very interested to see how
would seem to me that Trump is
endorsement because it will
politically speaking, but I
be sidelined in short order in
administration. I don't think
long as Kennedy is continuing to
think he'll get very far with
business interests and how they
But actually, I wanted to go
issue, because again, as I know
trillion dollar boondoggle that
at the table is going to be
snoot into it, and it is going
if and when it is established
structures. So yes, one can
players on both sides of the so
be interested in that just one
taking place just from this
published a new audit of the
between 2017 and 2023 as as much
were distributed by the World
be accounted for due to poor
again, surprise, surprise. Where
it's like the Pentagon audit and
way, as it also just comes out
turns out that the the
has been taking place since 2020
course, has been due to
burps, etc. That's, that's
rise in methane. Well, as it
methane was going up, but the
test for was the isotope of
example, to test whether this
methane, which, oh, by the way,
whether or not this is produced
human, ostensible human sources,
turns out, oh, when you actually
turns out that 90% of this rise
microbes, not anything to do
that means we won't have to eat
that somehow doomsday will not
is, this is the type
of, let's just make a new
trading exactly
right as an opportunity. And
it's both sides of the remember
derivatives, weather trading,
course, in bed with the Bush
family. So there you go. So yes,
boondoggle that will continue to
established in international
Well, I think it's going to
resolve the US government debt
mainstream US politicians,
saying that the next president
government debt crisis that
in the case of Trump, it's
from what he said, is going to
coins, which gobble up
They hold more treasuries with
nation states. Now, I forget
very, very significant and
And of course, PayPal has
coin. That's likely with, you
regulation making its way
very much favor py USD, as it's
know, decades in the making to
may actually have it now, um,
uh, something that I came across
former VP pick Nicole Shanahan,
was formerly the wife of Sergey
was, banked by JP Morgan, with
was wrote a paper, of course,
presidential candidate or really
quantitative, about
carbon markets, and how the US
of carbon coin. And you know,
money printing and sort of
think there's going to be an
government debt all over the
pretty much been overtly said by
of dollar stable coins, which is
This cycle, at least, is a major
and essentially dollarize whole
overtly. So it's not formal
El Salvador and Ecuador. It's
people use $1 denominated or
like tether, instead of, you
which is actually happening in
unprecedented numbers, which is
you have people like former
being like, yeah, stable coins
world. So definitely things that
but lead us to the ultimate,
CBDCs were heralded to do. So I
things that people really need
those opposed to the
call it agenda 2030, or or
know, in the interest of time,
solutions to this problem.
like has happened to me, if you
opinions that we have done over
invariably, a lot of the
these facts means you offer no
you're a doom pillar and a black
don't make me feel good,
actually are solutions to this
in the introduction, to this
diagnosing the problem
solving the problem, and so
note that both parties are
their best efforts to sign up
know, in my opinion, if you look
two candidates, as we have done
to sort of this, this
for global governance, one of
people should pursue is saying
directly and not really focusing
politician B, or famous person
think one of the fundamental
be digital ID, which, in case
the Sustainable Development
cornerstone of that broader
essential, they say, to
all of the different goals that
17 Sustainable Development
think also exiting the two party
think the the unprecedented
into the spectacle year after
need people to do that. They
two party paradigm. Anyway,
I'm sure you have many more. I
have had a long running series
in my opinion, very, very good.
to talk about how we can solve
Yes. Well, if people are
hope they will go to quarter
Watch where week in and week
few week break. But I generally
different aspects of the
they all tend to, or I won't say
lead back to the same, the same
which is, I think yes, mass non
absolutely important. It's
do not take the digital ID, that
currency is going to be foisted
that it's another thing to do
learned during the scandemic
easy to have high faluting
let government tell me to stay
me to wear a mask or to take the
your circumstances. And are you?
that is going to necessitate you
interventions, etc? So yes, it's
what you will and will not do.
be prepared to live that out.
past few years of craziness has
exceptionally important that you
sort. And that doesn't
living cheek to jowl with a
exactly like you do, but it does
in your area, for example, what
people and networks and
tap into in times of emergency,
might be, that you can at the
emergency. And why not use that
sturdy communities from which
hopefully actually create a
using our time, our energy, our
building up the the the beast
constantly giving Our time,
political spectacle and to all
associated with the people that
spectacle. Wouldn't it be nice
energy, intention and resources,
community structures that we
think that has to be a
solution. Because, yes, I think,
we have to do everything all at
convert to living on clouds
doing at all. Also, I think it's
there are steps. We don't have
things and go through
enough will do and so, for
simple idea that Catherine
was cash Fridays. How about just
possible for you to fulfill your
in cash, instead of using a car,
form of payment, why not just
everything you need that day
possible, hey, maybe you can
Thursday and Friday, or cash
every day, and see if you can
that. And that could be part of
out what is in your community,
the process that is actually
into a voting booth to cast your
suggestion box. Vote harder
voluntaryist, I fundamentally
initiation of force, and
actually participate in that
what? I won't even care that
step into that voting booth and
or another, not only because
count, and it will be counted by
voting machines will tell you
but also because, again, it's
insignificant. It's when people
entire lives, around this event
years, as if it's truly
energy that the real deep state
function the way that it wants
your energy and your resources.
hey, you know what? Whatever go
whoever for whoever you want. I
spend the rest of the four years
talking about that, not doing
And I think that is what is
going to be the thing that
we realize that the emergency is
anything set up to catch us from
absolutely and I would the
is that I think there are also
subscribe to the two party
attention to be monopolized by
includes people in independent
mean, obviously, for reasons of,
job. You know, we're plugged in
Twitter trolls all the time and
happens, but you know,
whether you subscribe to the two
goal, as you pointed out, is to
things that actually mattered
that and not actually building
any sort of solution that is
people to keep that in mind,
of social media, intentionally
important for people to make
since social media is just
have US military studies from
US Air Force, particularly,
studying how to use social media
were drones. You know, people
this stuff aren't necessarily
have pentagon and intelligence
social media networks to think
tactics aren't being used, or
you're arguing with online are
generative AI powered bots and
written before, on AI, if you
book on AI. Essentially, what
to have people not know what's
have aI tell them what is real
become dependent on AI to
and we need to be careful those
through election time rules that
kind of things as well. So
anyway. That's all I'd like to
thoughts, James? Before we wrap
I wholeheartedly concur with
something that I at the very
contemplate. As it turns out
saw, and this was several years
much as 16 hours a day in
screens, talking to people
that's almost all of your life
and very high that's, that's a
something that at the very
cognizant of and thinking about.
part to help spread awareness of
to tell people what to do with
make suggestions. So as I say, I
solutions, watch series, and if
the spectacle and where where
going, I would suggest people
documentary. But other than
covered a lot of ground today.
absolutely. And thanks so
know you're very busy. You
that you have done, and you've
times earlier, but if you could
find your work and support you,
addition to this podcast. Sure
Corbett report.com is the
E, T, T, report.com. And I am on
rumble, actually, Odyssey and
Twitter. I'm not on YouTube, of
was scrubbed from YouTube
on Instagram, tick tock or any
either. So the best place to go
there you can find literally
and video that I've created over
which in internet terms, I think
doing this a long time, so yeah,
you absolutely have been
opinion, you were one of the
joining me today and sharing
which I value very highly with
appreciated. Thanks to everyone
If you enjoyed it, please share.
you are able and sort of echoing
familiar, I have a major issue
social media or other video
channels or accounts. So in my
either sign up to the unlimited
unlimited hangout.com if you
saying and doing and not what
over, you know, bought
think we'll all be better off
going to be just, you know, I'm
people as well. So important to
thanks to everyone who supports
on the next episode. Thanks very