1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:07,000
If you look at the performance of Bitcoin and gold, I mean, take those two assets together as being sort of pure monetary inflation hedges.

2
00:00:07,160 --> 00:00:10,340
Over the long term, Bitcoin and gold tend to correlate positively.

3
00:00:10,880 --> 00:00:17,560
But one of the anomalies and one of the curiosities one finds in the data is that they have a short term negative correlation.

4
00:00:18,060 --> 00:00:21,640
So basically, they tend to trend together but cycle apart.

5
00:00:21,880 --> 00:00:23,920
Why it's happening is kind of curious.

6
00:00:23,920 --> 00:00:28,480
And it may be with practicalities is it may be this arbitrage which is going on.

7
00:00:28,480 --> 00:00:32,440
And so people felt gold had gone too far and they were switching out of gold back into Bitcoin.

8
00:00:32,640 --> 00:00:38,200
Since the 2008 crisis, markets are much, much more collateral based.

9
00:00:38,700 --> 00:00:43,460
And so, you know, the Fed has really got to be on guard against disruptions or volatility in that market.

10
00:00:43,780 --> 00:00:46,160
And they need a decent sized balance sheet to do that.

11
00:00:46,160 --> 00:00:52,460
You know, I'll come quietly and accept the fact that they could throw the switch, come back in quickly and add a lot more liquidity if necessary.

12
00:00:52,620 --> 00:00:53,740
They can inject a lot of money.

13
00:00:53,860 --> 00:00:57,160
But the trouble with doing that is that you're kind of hostage to fortune each time.

14
00:00:57,160 --> 00:00:58,760
and every crisis you have to deal with,

15
00:00:59,060 --> 00:01:01,420
the Fed's reputation is on the line.

16
00:01:01,660 --> 00:01:03,960
So I don't think that's sort of good policy

17
00:01:03,960 --> 00:01:05,460
or good politics to do that.

18
00:01:05,880 --> 00:01:08,780
We can see here, Joe, is the global liquidity cycle.

19
00:01:08,960 --> 00:01:10,600
This is looking at the underlying momentum

20
00:01:10,600 --> 00:01:11,860
of global liquidity.

21
00:01:12,320 --> 00:01:15,060
And what you can see is that the cycle moves

22
00:01:15,060 --> 00:01:17,340
with a frequency of about five to six years.

23
00:01:17,340 --> 00:01:23,120
That five to six year cycle bottomed in October of 2022.

24
00:01:23,480 --> 00:01:26,640
It peaked in Q3 of 2025.

25
00:01:27,160 --> 00:01:30,260
And it's slated to fall into 2027.

26
00:01:30,500 --> 00:01:34,940
So this year is basically a year where liquidity is really slowing down quite markedly.

27
00:01:35,280 --> 00:01:37,260
And that's really why we're concerned.

28
00:01:37,440 --> 00:01:39,980
The impact of higher oil prices is pretty significant.

29
00:01:40,400 --> 00:01:48,380
And you can pretty much gauge it as a rule of thumb by saying that every 10 bucks on a barrel of oil is probably taking about 2% out of liquidity.

30
00:01:48,380 --> 00:01:50,360
So it's a material effect.

31
00:01:51,040 --> 00:01:54,420
Certainly in the short term, the impact effect is pretty significant.

32
00:01:54,580 --> 00:01:55,920
Welcome back to Over the Horizon.

33
00:01:55,920 --> 00:02:04,200
Today, I'm here with Michael Howell, the founder of Cross-Border Capital, the author of Capital Wars and the Capital Wars Substack, and the proverbial godfather of global liquidity.

34
00:02:04,360 --> 00:02:05,580
Michael, thanks so much for joining me.

35
00:02:06,240 --> 00:02:07,480
Well, Joe, great pleasure to be here.

36
00:02:07,940 --> 00:02:12,620
Yeah, absolutely. It's been a while since we last spoke, I think 18 or 24 months, something like that.

37
00:02:12,660 --> 00:02:17,920
The world has changed. Quite a bit has changed. Obviously, gold has more than doubled over the last year and some change.

38
00:02:18,380 --> 00:02:23,980
And more recently, we've had the kickoff of the Iran war and obviously the oil shock that has resulted from that.

39
00:02:23,980 --> 00:02:52,620
As we're recording this, it's March 25th. We're going to be uploading this tomorrow. But since February 28th, the U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iran and basically shut the Strait of Hormuz. Crude oil has been all over the place, hugely volatile. You've been talking about oil on the shows that you've done over the last couple of months. Walk us through what this oil shock is doing to the global liquidity picture in real time and what this war has done as far as your outlook for markets for this year.

40
00:02:53,440 --> 00:02:58,280
Well, I think the first thing to say is it reinforces the kind of negative spin we've

41
00:02:58,280 --> 00:03:00,900
been developing about the outlook for risk assets.

42
00:03:01,560 --> 00:03:05,920
And I think the first thing to say is that the liquidity cycle, which is what we deem

43
00:03:05,920 --> 00:03:13,700
as being sort of paramount or a paramount driver of asset markets, peaked in late 2025.

44
00:03:14,360 --> 00:03:19,380
It inflected lower, and it's been basically falling thereafter, not at a particularly rapid

45
00:03:19,380 --> 00:03:25,260
speed, but the fact is that it's going down and that's not helpful. So what we've had is the Iran

46
00:03:25,260 --> 00:03:32,080
crisis basically hitting markets at that same time. And that's clearly created yet another air

47
00:03:32,080 --> 00:03:37,160
pocket, which markets have got to deal with. Now, I think the problem that one faces, particularly

48
00:03:37,160 --> 00:03:44,080
if one puts the Iran conflict into context and the result of higher oil, is that all money that's

49
00:03:44,080 --> 00:03:49,500
anywhere must be somewhere. And if that money is going into defense spending or it's going into

50
00:03:49,500 --> 00:03:55,320
higher oil prices or maintaining working capital in the energy industries or wherever,

51
00:03:55,500 --> 00:04:00,200
it's not in financial markets. And this is a problem. And so we're going to get further

52
00:04:00,200 --> 00:04:05,880
depletion of liquidity as we go forward unless central banks act. Now, my take is that I don't

53
00:04:05,880 --> 00:04:10,960
think they are going to act or they're certainly going to act positively or favorably. The general

54
00:04:10,960 --> 00:04:16,360
tenor that we're getting from looking at bond markets is that bond investors are basically

55
00:04:16,360 --> 00:04:21,880
discounting tightenings of monetary policy, in other words, higher policy rates. I think that's

56
00:04:21,880 --> 00:04:29,080
probably correct. I think the problem that one gets or one faces is that if you look across the

57
00:04:29,080 --> 00:04:35,060
range of policymakers worldwide, there are not that many that really have dual mandates like the Fed.

58
00:04:35,540 --> 00:04:39,440
A lot of those central banks around the world have single mandates, which is fighting inflation.

59
00:04:39,920 --> 00:04:45,720
So if you've got an inflation hit, although the textbooks may tell you that you don't want to be tightening during a supply shop,

60
00:04:45,720 --> 00:04:53,260
the reality is that they probably will because the COVID emergency told us that was actually, with hindsight, the sensible thing to do.

61
00:04:54,120 --> 00:04:54,640
Very well said.

62
00:04:55,300 --> 00:04:59,720
Obviously, oil is one of the biggest absorbers of working capital on the planet.

63
00:05:00,020 --> 00:05:05,720
We've seen crude between 90 and 100 quite often over the last couple of weeks.

64
00:05:05,720 --> 00:05:14,320
What is the impact of crude oil sustaining itself around or above $100 as far as private sector liquidity is concerned?

65
00:05:14,480 --> 00:05:20,480
This down cycle in the global liquidity cycle that you're speaking of, would that accelerate that?

66
00:05:20,640 --> 00:05:25,220
And would that then not ignite sort of an easing impact from central banks?

67
00:05:25,440 --> 00:05:27,400
Or what way do you see that playing out?

68
00:05:28,400 --> 00:05:29,940
Well, then the answer is yes, it would.

69
00:05:30,040 --> 00:05:33,660
I mean, the impact of higher oil prices is pretty significant.

70
00:05:33,660 --> 00:05:42,220
And you can pretty much gauge it as a rule of thumb by saying that every 10 bucks on a barrel of oil is probably taking about 2% out of liquidity.

71
00:05:42,520 --> 00:05:44,220
So it's a material effect.

72
00:05:45,780 --> 00:05:49,200
Certainly in the short term, the impact effect is pretty significant.

73
00:05:49,940 --> 00:05:53,680
So let's not diminish the role of oil.

74
00:05:54,160 --> 00:05:59,380
And I think the thing as well is that do oil prices kind of stay here or do they go higher?

75
00:05:59,380 --> 00:06:13,460
And I think one of the concerns we've had is that if you look at what's been happening to commodity markets, commodity markets are really seeing maybe a fairly normal cycle or a normal cycle blow off.

76
00:06:14,160 --> 00:06:18,340
And what I mean by that is that you've seen the typical pattern that liquidity has gone up.

77
00:06:19,040 --> 00:06:22,400
But the gold market has already responded to that, certainly in size.

78
00:06:22,560 --> 00:06:24,540
I mean, gold has skyrocketed, we know.

79
00:06:24,540 --> 00:06:30,140
I know it's falling back at the moment, but I would imagine that's probably, you know,

80
00:06:30,280 --> 00:06:33,360
forced selling because a lot of CTAs have had leveraged positions.

81
00:06:34,000 --> 00:06:37,740
And one would imagine that many of the Gulf states who have got, you know, big outlays

82
00:06:37,740 --> 00:06:42,100
to face without revenues from oil in coming months are probably liquidating some of their

83
00:06:42,100 --> 00:06:43,140
gold positions.

84
00:06:43,900 --> 00:06:46,040
So, you know, there will be profit taking.

85
00:06:46,180 --> 00:06:49,460
But at the end of the day, what we've had is a big rise in the gold price.

86
00:06:49,460 --> 00:06:54,280
Let's say it's circa hovering around, what, $4,500, $5,000 an ounce.

87
00:06:54,540 --> 00:06:59,180
And I think you've got to put that in context and think what that means for oil prices.

88
00:06:59,660 --> 00:07:05,040
And over the long term, the oil-gold ratio is basically averaged about 20 times.

89
00:07:05,580 --> 00:07:08,140
That's been a very robust statistic.

90
00:07:08,140 --> 00:07:14,640
I mean, going all the way back to the 1970s or early 1970s, it tends to show mean reversion

91
00:07:14,640 --> 00:07:19,520
when you get a displacement back to that 20 times level within about two to three years.

92
00:07:19,520 --> 00:07:23,260
and broadly at the end of September,

93
00:07:23,500 --> 00:07:24,960
sorry, the end of February,

94
00:07:25,500 --> 00:07:27,820
we were at about 70 times.

95
00:07:28,220 --> 00:07:31,660
So we were way, way, way above the normal ratio.

96
00:07:32,180 --> 00:07:33,780
So if you start to factor in,

97
00:07:34,220 --> 00:07:36,080
let's keep the math straightforward

98
00:07:36,080 --> 00:07:37,560
and say, okay, we're going to keep,

99
00:07:37,940 --> 00:07:39,760
we're going to say gold prices

100
00:07:39,760 --> 00:07:41,800
are stuck at about $5,000 an ounce.

101
00:07:42,240 --> 00:07:44,300
If you divide that by 20 times,

102
00:07:44,300 --> 00:07:47,740
you're talking about an oil price of $250 a barrel.

103
00:07:47,740 --> 00:07:55,420
Now, that's an eye-watering size. We made a presentation to clients about a week ago or so,

104
00:07:55,560 --> 00:07:59,920
10 days ago on that point and said, look, this is the backdrop. This is the context you've got to

105
00:07:59,920 --> 00:08:05,400
try to think about oil and commodity prices in. They're responding to a general monetary inflation

106
00:08:05,400 --> 00:08:10,880
and it's not impossible for oil to go a lot higher. Now, somebody said to me, I was insane

107
00:08:10,880 --> 00:08:15,980
by suggesting that oil could go to that level. But my response is, well, okay, you've got three

108
00:08:15,980 --> 00:08:22,440
moving parts here. One of them is wrong. Either the gold price of $5,000 an ounce is wrong.

109
00:08:22,840 --> 00:08:27,820
I think that's probably nearer correct than not, because the Chinese are buying gold with some

110
00:08:27,820 --> 00:08:34,840
alacrity. The second thing is, is the gold ratio incorrect? 20 times has been our long-term history.

111
00:08:35,000 --> 00:08:39,620
Okay, you can make a case for saying it could be a tad higher, but it's always dangerous to say it's

112
00:08:39,620 --> 00:08:44,100
different this time, isn't it? Or the oil price is wrong. So you choose which one of those three

113
00:08:44,100 --> 00:08:49,400
is out of line, and then we can have a debate. But broadly, you've got risks of higher commodity

114
00:08:49,400 --> 00:08:53,920
inflation. And if higher commodity inflation is the result, I think central banks are going to

115
00:08:53,920 --> 00:08:57,760
have to address that. And what's more, liquidity is going to get further sat.

116
00:08:58,880 --> 00:09:04,340
Very, very well said. Either gold has to revert hugely back down to its long-term growth rate,

117
00:09:04,380 --> 00:09:09,200
which seems relatively unlikely because of how much purchasing is happening from sovereigns

118
00:09:09,200 --> 00:09:13,500
around the world. In the near term, obviously, it may be impacted that the sell-off could be

119
00:09:13,500 --> 00:09:17,400
attributed to, as you mentioned, Gulf states who are no longer running their trade surplus,

120
00:09:17,520 --> 00:09:22,400
at least temporarily having to sell, or the oil price having to correct up massively,

121
00:09:22,400 --> 00:09:27,180
or just the oil to gold ratio fundamentally does not mean revert to 20 anymore. And in this

122
00:09:27,180 --> 00:09:33,060
new world order, this new economic regime globally that we have, perhaps that ratio is higher.

123
00:09:33,900 --> 00:09:38,340
Not to sort of be predictive here, but of those three situations, which do you view to be the

124
00:09:38,340 --> 00:09:44,020
most plausible? I think the most plausible is higher oil prices, for sure. Now, that clearly

125
00:09:44,020 --> 00:09:50,400
will be negated if we get a major economic recession, because the old adage in the commodity

126
00:09:50,400 --> 00:09:57,140
markets is the cure for higher prices is higher prices. So the reality is if you get a significant

127
00:09:57,140 --> 00:10:03,840
sell-off rise in oil, you're going to get markets selling off. You're going to get an economic

128
00:10:03,840 --> 00:10:09,080
recession probably is an outturn. And that by itself will probably correct the commodity price

129
00:10:09,080 --> 00:10:13,580
spike. But the fact is that we've got to live through what is likely to be upward pressure

130
00:10:13,580 --> 00:10:19,480
on commodities in the near term, and actually maybe in the longer term, if you start to believe that

131
00:10:19,480 --> 00:10:26,560
governments are, their government finances are shot through. And, you know, we're overtaxed,

132
00:10:26,560 --> 00:10:31,100
we all know that, we're probably on the wrong side of the Laffer curve. It's very difficult to

133
00:10:31,100 --> 00:10:36,440
sell bonds, you know, bond vigilantes are basically, you know, keeping tabs on governments,

134
00:10:36,840 --> 00:10:40,940
then the only course they've got is really to start printing money. And that's pretty much what

135
00:10:40,940 --> 00:10:44,720
they're doing. I mean, they're not telling us that. But, you know, you look at the shifts that

136
00:10:44,720 --> 00:10:50,100
Treasury Secretary Besson is making towards the front end of the market in terms of doing a lot

137
00:10:50,100 --> 00:10:55,940
of bill issuance. You know, the real question to ask is who buys those bills? And the short answer

138
00:10:55,940 --> 00:11:01,080
is who buys the bills? The very short dated debt tends to be banks. Banks buy government debt,

139
00:11:01,080 --> 00:11:03,400
That is pure and simple textbook monetization.

140
00:11:04,100 --> 00:11:05,760
That's what's going on right now.

141
00:11:06,100 --> 00:11:07,360
The US is doing it.

142
00:11:07,620 --> 00:11:09,560
The Japanese are saying they're going to start following.

143
00:11:09,740 --> 00:11:10,960
The Brits are going to start following.

144
00:11:11,440 --> 00:11:14,520
This is an easy way out for governments to do funding in the short term.

145
00:11:14,820 --> 00:11:17,860
But it's not good prudence in terms of public finances.

146
00:11:18,340 --> 00:11:25,160
Because, you know, to do a lot of short-term funding puts you really at the – you're hostage to markets and short-term interest rates.

147
00:11:25,520 --> 00:11:26,260
And that's not good.

148
00:11:26,260 --> 00:11:28,160
But the fact is it's monetization.

149
00:11:28,160 --> 00:11:32,400
And that probably is what the gold market in the long term is going to start responding to.

150
00:11:33,160 --> 00:11:33,560
Absolutely.

151
00:11:34,360 --> 00:11:39,320
It certainly seems that that may have been the preliminary response over the last year and a half or two years.

152
00:11:39,580 --> 00:11:44,980
Speaking of the treasury market, what's your outlook for the yield curve over this next part of the year?

153
00:11:45,100 --> 00:11:48,520
Since what happened in Iran, obviously twos are up, tens are up.

154
00:11:49,340 --> 00:11:56,260
But the shape of the yield curve, what's your view on how that's going to unfold over the next couple of months as we head into Q3 here or Q2?

155
00:11:56,260 --> 00:11:58,040
Well, I've got a very clear view on that.

156
00:11:58,180 --> 00:12:07,980
We've been saying that we expect the yield curve in the US, but true globally too, will basically flatten by the middle of the year or begin to flatten by the beginning of the year.

157
00:12:08,040 --> 00:12:09,580
So we definitely see an inflection.

158
00:12:09,580 --> 00:12:13,640
So what you're seeing in the Treasury market right now is actually no great surprise.

159
00:12:13,880 --> 00:12:17,160
We've been on that side to say that the yield curve will flatten.

160
00:12:17,600 --> 00:12:21,700
And that's broadly because if you see – I mean this is really outside of the Iran conflict.

161
00:12:21,700 --> 00:12:30,540
This is looking at the broad trends, that if you get liquidity conditions tightening, the demand for treasury or safe asset treasury is going to pick up significantly.

162
00:12:31,640 --> 00:12:42,160
And if you go back to, you know, not even, you know, two, well, probably two and a half months ago, you go back to the start of the year, you know, that was the absolutely non-consensus trade.

163
00:12:42,760 --> 00:12:45,420
Basically, everyone was arguing for a steeper yield curve.

164
00:12:45,600 --> 00:12:46,640
You don't want to own bonds.

165
00:12:46,740 --> 00:12:50,380
That was the sort of credo curve that was around in everyone's lips.

166
00:12:50,380 --> 00:12:53,120
and actually that's turned out not so well.

167
00:12:53,240 --> 00:12:56,020
I mean, okay, long-term yields have moved up a tad,

168
00:12:56,320 --> 00:12:59,000
but at the end of the day, the great, great surprise in markets

169
00:12:59,000 --> 00:13:01,280
is how stable and actually how flat

170
00:13:01,280 --> 00:13:04,380
and maybe even how much lower term premium

171
00:13:04,380 --> 00:13:06,360
have actually moved in recent weeks.

172
00:13:06,820 --> 00:13:08,960
And that has really gone completely against

173
00:13:08,960 --> 00:13:10,280
what the consensus has been arguing.

174
00:13:11,520 --> 00:13:12,020
Yeah, absolutely.

175
00:13:12,240 --> 00:13:13,760
I mean, just one month ago,

176
00:13:14,220 --> 00:13:16,420
slightly prior to the initial strikes,

177
00:13:16,560 --> 00:13:19,500
you had the belly of the curve was inverted

178
00:13:19,500 --> 00:13:22,180
And now we've tended to normalize a bit.

179
00:13:22,260 --> 00:13:25,460
And so it seems like your thesis is playing out here in real time.

180
00:13:27,060 --> 00:13:33,600
So taking a step toward asset markets here, you said obviously the liquidity cycle is

181
00:13:33,600 --> 00:13:34,640
moving into a downturn.

182
00:13:34,720 --> 00:13:36,540
It has been since late last year.

183
00:13:37,520 --> 00:13:41,360
Bitcoin seems to be one of the first assets, along with software stocks and a number of

184
00:13:41,360 --> 00:13:45,260
other really high beta equities, to sniff that out and begin selling off in early October.

185
00:13:46,020 --> 00:13:50,980
The question I have is a little bit different from what you may have been asked before.

186
00:13:51,080 --> 00:13:55,920
Maybe you've had your eye on this over the last month, but relative to a suite of major

187
00:13:55,920 --> 00:14:02,440
macro assets, gold, the S&P 500, silver, Bitcoin has been outperforming since the start of

188
00:14:02,440 --> 00:14:02,800
the war.

189
00:14:03,120 --> 00:14:08,400
This is very strange to me because typically, right, in these events where correlation is

190
00:14:08,400 --> 00:14:11,280
true to one, Bitcoin is one of the assets that gets hit the hardest.

191
00:14:11,280 --> 00:14:25,442
If you see the S 500 down 4 which it is over the last month Bitcoin tends to be down 8 or 9 However Bitcoin is up about 7 7 while silver is down about 20 gold is down about 17

192
00:14:25,442 --> 00:14:27,862
Spooze and the NASDAQ are down marginally.

193
00:14:28,642 --> 00:14:30,582
What do you think is the explanation for this?

194
00:14:30,622 --> 00:14:35,762
Is this purely a function of the sell-off in Bitcoin being front-loaded to the end of last year, or is this something different?

195
00:14:36,502 --> 00:14:37,742
I think it could be.

196
00:14:37,882 --> 00:14:40,362
I mean, I think there are a number of things going on.

197
00:14:40,362 --> 00:14:52,882
But I mean one of the things that – one of the factors that I would cite is that – or to recall is that if you look at the performance of Bitcoin and gold, I mean take those two assets together as being sort of pure monetary inflation hedges.

198
00:14:53,522 --> 00:14:57,362
Over the long term, Bitcoin and gold tend to correlate positively.

199
00:14:57,862 --> 00:15:04,602
But one of the anomalies and one of the curiosities one finds in the data is that they have a short-term negative correlation.

200
00:15:04,602 --> 00:15:09,882
So basically, they tend to trend together but cycle apart.

201
00:15:10,722 --> 00:15:18,982
And that's curious, and that may tell us a little bit about the dynamics between the two markets, maybe people doing substitution trades or arbitrage trades between the two.

202
00:15:19,142 --> 00:15:19,882
I'm not sure.

203
00:15:20,222 --> 00:15:22,442
But that seems to be really what's going on.

204
00:15:24,462 --> 00:15:27,722
In a way, it fits in with the pattern of the data.

205
00:15:28,242 --> 00:15:34,882
Why it's happening is kind of curious, and it may be with practicalities, is it may be this arbitrage which is going on.

206
00:15:34,922 --> 00:15:38,902
So people felt gold had gone too far and they were switching out of gold back into Bitcoin.

207
00:15:39,062 --> 00:15:40,002
That's a possibility.

208
00:15:40,822 --> 00:15:45,462
The other thing is that you've got to remember what the Federal Reserve has been doing in the very short term

209
00:15:45,462 --> 00:15:52,682
is the Federal Reserve basically introduced reserve management purchases late in 2025.

210
00:15:52,682 --> 00:16:01,742
Now, those reserve management purchases have basically caused treasury holdings at the Fed to spike upwards quite significantly.

211
00:16:02,262 --> 00:16:10,322
So in other words, what you've seen is something like a restoration of about $200 billion back into US money markets.

212
00:16:10,322 --> 00:16:25,722
So in other words, US bank reserves are now testing around the $3 trillion mark, having been down at about, from my memory, about 2.8 or maybe a tad lower in late 2025, early 26.

213
00:16:26,302 --> 00:16:33,042
So you've had this sort of rebound in liquidity, which has really been the result of the Fed moving liquidity back in.

214
00:16:33,302 --> 00:16:35,202
Now, that may be a short-term impulse.

215
00:16:35,302 --> 00:16:36,082
I'm not sure.

216
00:16:37,002 --> 00:16:42,182
Liquidity conditions, if you look at it on a very short-term weekly basis, have ticked slightly higher.

217
00:16:42,182 --> 00:16:46,662
But that doesn't deny the fact that the trend generally looks to us to be downwards.

218
00:16:47,242 --> 00:16:48,882
But, you know, these things happen.

219
00:16:49,502 --> 00:16:53,942
My view would be that, you know, like probably the same sentiment towards gold.

220
00:16:54,302 --> 00:16:59,222
I mean, these are proven long-term monetary inflation hedges.

221
00:16:59,682 --> 00:17:03,762
Bitcoin, admittedly, has only proved it over 15 years, gold 5,000 years.

222
00:17:03,762 --> 00:17:10,402
But the fact is that both have got a pretty good, let's say, recent track record of hedging monetary inflation.

223
00:17:10,882 --> 00:17:19,182
If we're going to get more monetary inflation, which I would be 100% certain we are because that's the only route out, you've got to own both these assets.

224
00:17:19,842 --> 00:17:24,762
And generally speaking, you don't necessarily want to trade these assets.

225
00:17:25,402 --> 00:17:26,182
You want to own them.

226
00:17:26,442 --> 00:17:28,202
And that's really the sort of bottom line.

227
00:17:28,882 --> 00:17:31,522
We know that gold and Bitcoin trend together.

228
00:17:31,522 --> 00:17:34,402
We know there's history of them cycling apart.

229
00:17:35,122 --> 00:17:40,122
The way to operate in this environment is basically to say, well, okay, I'm trying to

230
00:17:40,122 --> 00:17:44,642
build my positions up, and I'll do it when they fall significantly below their trend lines.

231
00:17:45,482 --> 00:17:49,262
That's not going to happen overnight, but it probably will happen because that's the

232
00:17:49,262 --> 00:17:50,102
way the markets work.

233
00:17:50,162 --> 00:17:50,982
They go up and down.

234
00:17:51,322 --> 00:17:56,642
But I would be looking to buy both assets when they're about one standard deviation or

235
00:17:56,642 --> 00:17:58,822
hopefully more below their trends.

236
00:17:59,502 --> 00:18:02,122
What does that mean in sort of dollars and cents?

237
00:18:02,202 --> 00:18:04,322
It probably means about 20% below.

238
00:18:04,762 --> 00:18:07,062
But that would be a fairly decent rule of thumb.

239
00:18:07,802 --> 00:18:09,422
So that's what I would be doing.

240
00:18:09,862 --> 00:18:14,442
And I wouldn't try and sort of, you know, never try and catch a falling knife in financial markets.

241
00:18:14,782 --> 00:18:20,162
But, you know, equally, when sentiment gets really beaten up, it's probably not a bad time to be moving back in.

242
00:18:20,162 --> 00:18:24,462
But I think you'll wait for a little bit of stability first and then start to act.

243
00:18:25,522 --> 00:18:25,642
Absolutely.

244
00:18:25,642 --> 00:18:33,282
Yeah, and it seems gold has at least begun to demonstrate that stability or at the very least begun to demonstrate that it is bouncing off long-term trends.

245
00:18:33,462 --> 00:18:39,682
A couple of days ago, we bounced, I believe, off the 200-day or 200-week moving average.

246
00:18:39,762 --> 00:18:45,362
I think it was the 200-day moving average for gold, 27% dry down, which is not typically what you see in gold.

247
00:18:45,442 --> 00:18:46,802
So certainly a good entry point there.

248
00:18:47,422 --> 00:18:51,822
You talked briefly about the Fed's R&P facility, their reserve management purchases.

249
00:18:52,622 --> 00:18:54,042
It's funny, a friend had joked to me,

250
00:18:54,082 --> 00:18:55,622
it seems like they're running out of acronyms

251
00:18:55,622 --> 00:18:57,382
for their liquidity facilities at this point,

252
00:18:57,542 --> 00:18:59,202
but I don't think there's any shortage of them.

253
00:18:59,882 --> 00:19:03,722
The cadence is about $40 billion a month in bill purchases.

254
00:19:04,262 --> 00:19:05,742
Is this liquidity positive?

255
00:19:06,082 --> 00:19:07,602
Is it liquidity neutral, liquidity negative?

256
00:19:07,822 --> 00:19:09,602
What's your view on this RMP facility

257
00:19:09,602 --> 00:19:12,422
and any impact it may have on risk markets, if any?

258
00:19:13,502 --> 00:19:15,542
Well, I mean, the answer is that it's positive

259
00:19:15,542 --> 00:19:16,582
because it's more liquidity.

260
00:19:16,762 --> 00:19:17,762
It's a QE exercise.

261
00:19:17,902 --> 00:19:19,402
They deny that, but clearly it is.

262
00:19:19,502 --> 00:19:20,742
I mean, there's no question about that.

263
00:19:21,822 --> 00:19:31,342
is it positive yes for sure is it big well probably not i mean in in in overall terms it's

264
00:19:31,342 --> 00:19:37,382
not going to be that big i mean it may add back you know i mean potentially 250 possibly 300 billion

265
00:19:37,382 --> 00:19:41,762
this year i mean that's not insignificant clearly but you know in the big scheme of things it's not

266
00:19:41,762 --> 00:19:46,442
going to necessarily move the needle over the long term um you know the fact is that it's been

267
00:19:46,442 --> 00:19:54,322
front end loaded. So, you know, it's in anticipation of the April tax paying season when the TGA will

268
00:19:54,322 --> 00:20:02,162
spike. So that's probably the peak of their activity. But, you know, I mean, it's not bearish,

269
00:20:02,282 --> 00:20:05,802
but in that way, the question is really just to find how bullish it is. And I don't think it's

270
00:20:05,802 --> 00:20:11,522
that bullish, but I mean, it's clearly a positive, not a negative. Are they going to do more? Well,

271
00:20:11,542 --> 00:20:15,502
I think the thing is, I mean, what's been demonstrated here, and I think this is a,

272
00:20:15,502 --> 00:20:21,902
pretty good point as to the future, is that repo markets sold off at the end of last year.

273
00:20:22,062 --> 00:20:26,702
In other words, what I'm saying here is that repo rates spiked well above Fed funds or interest

274
00:20:26,702 --> 00:20:32,222
and overnight reserve balances of banks. That spiked significantly when there was a relatively

275
00:20:32,222 --> 00:20:40,082
minor drawdown in money markets. So it shows how poised or tense markets are, repo markets at least.

276
00:20:40,662 --> 00:20:45,022
And we saw these spikes and there had only been a drain of about 200 billion. Now,

277
00:20:45,022 --> 00:21:01,162
If you start to think of what the Fed is kind of talking about, maybe, you know, incoming Governor Walsh and Treasury Secretary Bessender inferring, they're talking about, you know, taking trillions out of the Fed balance sheet to get it down to some what they call nostalgically some sort of normal level.

278
00:21:01,682 --> 00:21:03,262
I just don't think that's possible.

279
00:21:03,262 --> 00:21:17,582
I would really, really struggle to feel comfortable with that because, you know, the fact of the matter is, is that since the GFC, the Federal Reserve has not only got to look after the banks, it's got to look after the bond markets and the shadow banking sector combined.

280
00:21:17,582 --> 00:21:29,542
And if you look at the scale of the change, since the GFC, if my memory serves me correctly, we've had a twofold increase in overall bank lending, okay?

281
00:21:30,002 --> 00:21:37,762
And we've had a five and a half fold increase in the size of treasury debt outstanding, marketable treasury debt outstanding.

282
00:21:37,762 --> 00:21:56,142
So that fivefold or more than fivefold increase in Treasury debt is saying that the Federal Reserve is going to have to be on guard against disruptions in the Treasury market, not least because dealer capacity in the private sector has probably halved or maybe more than halved during that period.

283
00:21:56,142 --> 00:22:11,742
So the normal stability mechanism is really not there and the market is way, way, way bigger. What's more, since the 2008 crisis, markets are much, much more collateral based.

284
00:22:12,302 --> 00:22:20,102
And so the US Treasury bond is really at the center of the global financial system now in a way that it wasn't before.

285
00:22:20,642 --> 00:22:26,382
And so the Fed has really got to be on guard against disruptions of volatility in that market.

286
00:22:26,582 --> 00:22:29,082
And they need a decent-sized banal sheet to do that.

287
00:22:29,162 --> 00:22:37,502
Now, clearly, I'll come quietly and accept the fact that they could, at a throw of a switch, come back in quickly and add a lot more liquidity if necessary.

288
00:22:38,042 --> 00:22:41,322
So from a much lower level, they can inject a lot of money.

289
00:22:41,322 --> 00:22:45,082
But the trouble with doing that is that you're kind of hostage to fortune each time.

290
00:22:45,122 --> 00:22:49,362
And every crisis you have to deal with, the Fed's reputation is on the line.

291
00:22:49,882 --> 00:22:53,682
So I don't think that's sort of good policy or good politics to do that.

292
00:22:53,922 --> 00:22:58,802
So I would be guarded and slightly wary about a big shrinkage in the balance sheet.

293
00:23:00,062 --> 00:23:00,082
Certainly.

294
00:23:00,602 --> 00:23:05,242
So if that's the case – I mean we have Warsh coming in in just a couple of months here.

295
00:23:05,362 --> 00:23:07,682
First time we've had a new Fed chair in quite some time.

296
00:23:08,782 --> 00:23:10,542
Do you think he's going to be much different from Powell?

297
00:23:10,542 --> 00:23:25,462
Well, if the mathematical reality is that we have to keep expanding the balance sheet, we can't necessarily normalize it to pre-GFC levels like a lot of folks are trying to say we can, then what, if anything, about Warsh is going to be different from the way that Powell is operating right now?

298
00:23:25,782 --> 00:23:30,062
Well, I would like to say, at least I think, he's going to be radically different for sure.

299
00:23:30,222 --> 00:23:31,922
I mean, I think that's the intention.

300
00:23:31,922 --> 00:23:41,402
You know, my view is that, you know, the route forward for the US and US policy is to really enhance the virtues of stablecoin.

301
00:23:41,882 --> 00:23:43,582
I think stablecoin could be big.

302
00:23:44,002 --> 00:23:48,822
I mean, we're, you know, we're only in the foothills yet at that market, but it could grow sizably.

303
00:23:49,522 --> 00:23:57,662
It would enable the re-dollarization of the world, something, a theme that Brent Johnson has spoken about many times.

304
00:23:57,662 --> 00:24:02,842
And I think he's absolutely spot on with this, that this could be a very significant development.

305
00:24:03,462 --> 00:24:08,302
A pointer to the threat is what's happened in China in the last few weeks.

306
00:24:08,702 --> 00:24:22,762
The Chinese have come out with a new restraining order called Notice 42, which basically doubles down on their previous blocks on Bitcoin, digital money of all form of cryptocurrencies.

307
00:24:22,762 --> 00:24:30,802
So they're making absolutely sure they're raising a significant firewall or great wall or whatever you like to call it against this threat.

308
00:24:30,942 --> 00:24:32,262
So they really see it.

309
00:24:32,702 --> 00:24:43,642
But once you start to go outside of China and look maybe at Africa or you look at Latin America, you look at countries like Turkey, you even go to mainland Europe, you look at Britain, you look at Australia.

310
00:24:44,002 --> 00:24:49,602
Are these countries really prepared for stablecoin, the threat of stablecoin?

311
00:24:49,602 --> 00:24:56,282
Now, it may well be that if you're in the developed or advanced economies, you might not see or residents might not see a great need.

312
00:24:56,382 --> 00:25:01,262
But there clearly will be some people that think the anonymity of stable coin is actually worth having.

313
00:25:01,562 --> 00:25:06,162
If they think they can get outside the tax net, then they're going to start to accumulate these things.

314
00:25:06,702 --> 00:25:19,462
But if you're in these other economies, Africa, Latin America, Turkey, et cetera, where you've got an inflation problem and you've got a flaky domestic currency, I think it's a no-brainer, quite honestly.

315
00:25:19,602 --> 00:25:24,122
And so you're going to get a very rapid dollarization of these markets.

316
00:25:24,682 --> 00:25:34,662
Now, I don't think the policymakers have kind of thought through what this means yet, but it could be a real windfall for the US Treasury if they can pull this one off.

317
00:25:34,742 --> 00:25:36,042
It's significant. It's a game changer.

318
00:25:37,242 --> 00:25:45,982
Absolutely. Yeah, you've – I think in one of the podcasts you did, I think it was the MacroDirt podcast, you said that stable coins are potentially one of the trump cards that the United States holds.

319
00:25:46,402 --> 00:25:51,602
Obviously, now that we're in a hot war with the Middle East, countries are sort of scrambling for US dollar liquidity.

320
00:25:52,442 --> 00:25:53,682
Oil is being rerouted.

321
00:25:54,302 --> 00:25:58,402
Do you think that this crisis is actually accelerating stablecoin adoption globally?

322
00:25:59,322 --> 00:26:05,722
I think it's making people certainly think or rethink the idea of moving away from the dollar, in my view.

323
00:26:06,162 --> 00:26:12,842
I know one reads in the sort of the financial media, particularly the Financial Times, which seem to have a thing about the US dollar,

324
00:26:12,842 --> 00:26:17,042
that every chance they get, they want to stick the knife in and say, this is the end of the dollar.

325
00:26:17,202 --> 00:26:21,002
I just think the trend is going the other way, to be perfectly truthful.

326
00:26:21,382 --> 00:26:22,682
I think it's actually more the opposite.

327
00:26:22,942 --> 00:26:25,882
Now, we can debate about the merits of the paper dollar,

328
00:26:25,882 --> 00:26:29,862
and I'd be the first to say that US public finances don't look strong.

329
00:26:30,342 --> 00:26:36,222
But at the end of the day, that's not necessarily the only thing that the dollar's strength really rests on.

330
00:26:36,662 --> 00:26:37,822
There's a huge network.

331
00:26:38,442 --> 00:26:41,422
And I think increasingly, if you start to look at the digital world,

332
00:26:41,882 --> 00:26:46,782
It's really the sort of the payment system which is really deriving the adoption of currencies.

333
00:26:47,522 --> 00:26:58,682
And if those payment mechanisms are going to start using stable coin or even just dollars per se, you're going to drive increasing demand and increasing usage of the US dollar.

334
00:26:59,282 --> 00:27:03,782
And as far as I can see, that's, if you like, a kind of inverted Gresham's law.

335
00:27:04,402 --> 00:27:08,302
So it's not a question of – or is it bad money drives out good?

336
00:27:08,362 --> 00:27:09,042
It's actually the opposite.

337
00:27:09,042 --> 00:27:10,822
is that good money drives out bad,

338
00:27:10,862 --> 00:27:14,122
and people will start to realize that the good money is what you can pay with.

339
00:27:14,462 --> 00:27:17,062
So if these digital payment networks are actually using dollars

340
00:27:17,062 --> 00:27:19,342
and that's an embedded currency within the system,

341
00:27:19,642 --> 00:27:21,522
then people are going to use these things more and more,

342
00:27:22,302 --> 00:27:25,422
rather use the US dollar than the Brazilian real

343
00:27:25,422 --> 00:27:29,962
or the Mexican peso or the Nigerian currency, I mean, for sure.

344
00:27:30,422 --> 00:27:33,422
These are going to be ultimately international payment mechanisms

345
00:27:33,422 --> 00:27:38,342
or big international payment mechanisms which underpin the dollar.

346
00:27:39,042 --> 00:27:49,242
Absolutely. It almost seems like we're sort of recreating the euro dollar market from first principles and re-dollarizing the world at a time where many pundits have argued that we're actually moving in the opposite direction.

347
00:27:50,182 --> 00:28:02,102
Yeah, I think that's right. I mean, we're basically moving there. I think that what I'm going to do is shift and turn and put a light on because you're talking to me as dusk is breaking in Europe.

348
00:28:02,542 --> 00:28:05,442
So we're going from bright sunshine to nighttime.

349
00:28:05,962 --> 00:28:14,582
So anyway, yeah, I think what we're getting here is that the euro-dollar market was essentially a wholesale market, which was very leveraged.

350
00:28:14,582 --> 00:28:20,442
Now, I think if you look at the stable coin market, you won't get the leverage, and it'll be retail, not wholesale-focused.

351
00:28:20,682 --> 00:28:24,102
But nonetheless, that parallel with those caveats, I think, applies.

352
00:28:24,582 --> 00:28:25,402
Very well said.

353
00:28:25,522 --> 00:28:40,124
Outside of the control of policymakers Absolutely I want to chat quickly about the debt maturity wall You spoken numerous times about how financial crises most financial crises are refinancing crises

354
00:28:40,724 --> 00:28:45,144
It obviously doesn't help right now that U.S. Treasury yields are spiking across the curve.

355
00:28:45,804 --> 00:28:50,984
So with the debt maturity wall climbing, liquidity is obviously declining, oil spiking,

356
00:28:51,104 --> 00:28:55,624
which is not helping at all. And on top of that, we're now in a hot war and Congress is debating

357
00:28:55,624 --> 00:29:00,924
spending hundreds of millions of dollars. How close are we to sort of the debt to liquidity

358
00:29:00,924 --> 00:29:04,744
ratio crossing what you would consider to be the danger threshold?

359
00:29:06,364 --> 00:29:14,144
Okay. So what we can see here, Joe, is the global liquidity cycle. And this is really the

360
00:29:14,144 --> 00:29:18,824
centerpiece of what we do. And this is looking at the underlying momentum of global liquidity.

361
00:29:19,464 --> 00:29:25,044
And what you can see is that the cycle moves with a frequency of about five to six years.

362
00:29:25,624 --> 00:29:31,744
The red dotted line is a sine wave that we've estimated using Fourier analysis on top of

363
00:29:31,744 --> 00:29:33,324
the actual data, which is in black.

364
00:29:33,864 --> 00:29:40,484
And that five to six year cycle bottomed in October of 2022.

365
00:29:40,904 --> 00:29:48,184
It peaked in Q3 of 2025, and it's slated to fall into 2027.

366
00:29:48,624 --> 00:29:53,044
So this year is basically a year where liquidity is really slowing down quite markedly.

367
00:29:53,324 --> 00:29:55,444
And that's really why we're concerned.

368
00:29:55,624 --> 00:30:04,424
Now, what you pointed to was what are the risks of this because clearly less liquidity is not as good as more liquidity for financial markets.

369
00:30:04,424 --> 00:30:07,504
So let me just move on to what this really means.

370
00:30:07,904 --> 00:30:09,964
And I'm going to come back to this chart.

371
00:30:10,144 --> 00:30:24,144
Now, what this chart basically shows is a schematic which argues that at the heart of stability in the modern financial system is a relationship between debt and liquidity, which we think of as the debt liquidity nexus.

372
00:30:24,144 --> 00:30:35,924
that basically says that liquidity needs debt insofar as that something like almost 80% of all lending is collateral backed.

373
00:30:36,544 --> 00:30:45,524
And also debt needs liquidity and something like 80% or 70% to 80% of all transactions in the financial markets are refinancing transactions.

374
00:30:46,004 --> 00:30:49,164
In other words, debt needs liquidity for refinancing.

375
00:30:49,164 --> 00:30:58,184
So you've got these twin legs, and what the diagram is trying to show is that there is an equilibrium there between debt and liquidity, and you have two wings.

376
00:30:58,624 --> 00:31:18,104
Either of those two wings can derail, so you either get the right-hand leg, which is the refinancing leg basically unraveling, and that will be signaled by credit spreads blowing out or term premia on government debt, in other words, safe assets coming to demand and term premia falling.

377
00:31:18,104 --> 00:31:39,664
Or you see the left-hand leg, the repo collateral leg, in other words, turning debt into liquidity, that leg breaking down, which basically is signaled by sofa spreads blowing out, or the move index of bond volatility, which governs the collateral multiplier and collateral haircuts, starting to spike upwards.

378
00:31:39,664 --> 00:32:00,704
Now, if you start to look at that particular process, the debt liquidity ratio is basically illustrated here. And what we show is the long-term track of that going back to 1980. And what we've used here is our data on global liquidity and IMF data on world debt.

379
00:32:00,704 --> 00:32:05,004
and that gives the ratio that you see here for the advanced economies.

380
00:32:05,484 --> 00:32:10,144
And if you look at that, there's a long-run equilibrium at about 200% or two times.

381
00:32:10,144 --> 00:32:17,344
So in other words, debt to liquidity of two is normal and anything significantly above that,

382
00:32:17,784 --> 00:32:24,124
up at the 220, 230 levels, tends to see crises resulting.

383
00:32:24,584 --> 00:32:29,404
In other words, what that's saying is there's too much debt in the system relative to liquidity

384
00:32:29,404 --> 00:32:34,624
to be refinanced, you get refinancing tensions, and central banks are forced to come back when

385
00:32:34,624 --> 00:32:41,784
there's a crisis. You've seen, as you can see, illustrate on that chart, refinancing crisis that

386
00:32:41,784 --> 00:32:47,304
we've identified. If you go to the opposite extreme, at the bottom, what you find there is

387
00:32:47,304 --> 00:32:54,004
you get basically asset bubbles, because if there is so much liquidity in excess of the amount of

388
00:32:54,004 --> 00:33:01,904
debt that needs to be refinanced. What you get is the vent being asset price increases, asset bubbles.

389
00:33:02,244 --> 00:33:07,384
And we've illustrated those on the chart. Now, what we've just been through is the so-called

390
00:33:07,384 --> 00:33:12,144
everything bubble. And the everything bubble is actually, as you can see here, quite a big one.

391
00:33:12,584 --> 00:33:17,144
There's been a huge amount of liquidity relative to debt. And that's really been caused by two

392
00:33:17,144 --> 00:33:23,304
factors. One is the response of policymakers to almost every crisis is to bump in more liquidity.

393
00:33:23,304 --> 00:33:30,424
and we've seen that as recently as late last year with the reserve management purchases by the Fed.

394
00:33:30,924 --> 00:33:36,384
We saw it in 2019 with the repo crisis. We saw it in 2020 with the COVID emergency.

395
00:33:36,384 --> 00:33:43,284
We saw it in 2008-9 with the Lehman crisis or global financial crisis. So all these responses

396
00:33:43,284 --> 00:33:48,144
basically mean more liquidity is pumped back into the system and it's going to happen again.

397
00:33:48,144 --> 00:33:53,604
But the problem is that central banks are reactive. So number one is that liquidity conditions were

398
00:33:53,604 --> 00:33:59,764
abundant. As we've said, they're beginning to weaken now. The other factor is that debt or the

399
00:33:59,764 --> 00:34:08,404
amount of debt that was coming due to be refinanced has basically slowed recently because as a result

400
00:34:08,404 --> 00:34:14,924
of the COVID emergency, recall that central banks also slashed interest rates to near zero in cases

401
00:34:14,924 --> 00:34:20,044
is negative, in fact. And what that did is not only encourage the take up of more debt,

402
00:34:20,404 --> 00:34:26,524
paradoxically, it also meant that debt was being termed out into later years. So in other words,

403
00:34:26,564 --> 00:34:31,344
you take your borrowing, which is due in two or three years time that you're paying 5% interest

404
00:34:31,344 --> 00:34:36,604
on, and you think, well, hey, why am I doing this? I'm going to refinance near zero. I'm going to

405
00:34:36,604 --> 00:34:43,444
term it out back into 2027, 2028, 29. And that's what was being done. So if you look at the debt

406
00:34:43,444 --> 00:34:50,164
maturity wall, this is showing the increments. This is not the actual level. This is the

407
00:34:50,164 --> 00:34:57,484
incremental changes in terms of debt that is coming into the system, growing each year. This

408
00:34:57,484 --> 00:35:01,924
is the incremental increase each year in the amount of debt that needs to be refinanced.

409
00:35:02,424 --> 00:35:08,904
And the overall amount is close to $50 trillion. But this is the increases you're getting. So about

410
00:35:08,904 --> 00:35:15,884
10% increases each year in the actual amount that needs refinancing. That is on top of what we're

411
00:35:15,884 --> 00:35:22,204
also seeing, which is new debt take up. So this is what's crowding into the markets. And it's fairly

412
00:35:22,204 --> 00:35:29,064
clear there that the big bite out of that chart in 21, 22, 23 was because of very, very low interest

413
00:35:29,064 --> 00:35:35,544
rates. Now, the crazy policy that policymakers enacted is coming back to haunt them. And that's

414
00:35:35,544 --> 00:35:40,104
That's what is called the debt maturity wall, which markets will have to face.

415
00:35:40,824 --> 00:35:47,964
If you go back to listening to who was probably the doyen of central bankers, somebody called

416
00:35:47,964 --> 00:35:53,704
Walter Badgett, who wrote some of the definitive very early works on central banking in the

417
00:35:53,704 --> 00:35:55,424
UK back in the 19th century.

418
00:35:55,424 --> 00:36:04,604
He has a famous quote, which is basically, lend freely at high interest rates against

419
00:36:04,604 --> 00:36:05,284
good collateral.

420
00:36:05,544 --> 00:36:15,684
And what our central banks have been doing in the last few years is lending furiously at low interest rates or negative interest rates against no collateral.

421
00:36:16,224 --> 00:36:22,124
And that seems to be a completely crazy policy to adopt and we're ripping the consequences.

422
00:36:23,224 --> 00:36:25,404
Absolutely. Yeah, it certainly seems so.

423
00:36:26,024 --> 00:36:30,664
I want to go back to the previous chart briefly because I've got a question about the debt to liquidity ratio there.

424
00:36:30,664 --> 00:36:49,684
What it shows here, you can see for the viewers at home, the everything bubble that's sitting on this chart, not only the deepest trough that we've ever seen going back to when the chart begins, but obviously central banks created that by flooding the system with just an insane amount of money printing, a crazy amount of QE.

425
00:36:50,644 --> 00:36:55,604
Scott Bacent and Kevin Warsh both have explicitly said that they want to avoid repeating that.

426
00:36:55,964 --> 00:37:01,564
Right here, you show that we're going to reach Eurozone banking crisis levels around 2029, 2030.

427
00:37:02,824 --> 00:37:17,104
So if we have this scenario where they succeed in keeping the Fed's footprint smaller, they don't do massive balance sheet expansion, does that mean the ratio could ostensibly climb faster in the next crisis may come sooner than later?

428
00:37:17,864 --> 00:37:18,904
Entirely possible, yeah.

429
00:37:18,904 --> 00:37:26,184
I would agree with that. No question. I think that this is why it's very dangerous to sort of

430
00:37:26,184 --> 00:37:33,124
muck around with the architecture of the financial system. The fact is that since the global financial

431
00:37:33,124 --> 00:37:38,884
crisis, despite all the regulation and whatever else we've had, the system has basically become

432
00:37:38,884 --> 00:37:43,784
more fragile, not more robust. And although there's been a lot of regulation of banks,

433
00:37:44,144 --> 00:37:48,124
and banks are not really the problem today. That's not the issue. The issue really comes

434
00:37:48,124 --> 00:37:52,264
much more to the credit markets and maybe even the government debt markets themselves.

435
00:37:53,004 --> 00:37:57,284
And that's really the issue we've got to face. I mean, government debt markets, as I indicated,

436
00:37:57,624 --> 00:38:04,964
are five times bigger than they were in 2008. I mean, this is eye-watering and eye-wateringly

437
00:38:04,964 --> 00:38:10,664
bigger problem. Absolutely. A question that's a bit of a departure from what we've been talking

438
00:38:10,664 --> 00:38:16,284
about. In previous podcasts that you've done, you've laid out a vision of two competing monetary

439
00:38:16,284 --> 00:38:21,124
systems forming globally, one being a U.S. system that's backed by stable coins and treasuries and

440
00:38:21,124 --> 00:38:25,564
that complex that's sort of taking shape, and the other being a Chinese system that's backed by gold

441
00:38:25,564 --> 00:38:30,464
or physical commodities. Now that we have an actual shooting war in the Middle East, a hot war that

442
00:38:30,464 --> 00:38:35,024
we haven't had in quite some time, disrupting real physical commodity infrastructure with the Strait

443
00:38:35,024 --> 00:38:41,044
of Hormuz being closed, which underpins the Chinese system, does that accelerate this bifurcation or

444
00:38:41,044 --> 00:38:42,484
does that complicate things a little bit?

445
00:38:43,624 --> 00:38:46,444
You know, to be perfectly truthful, I don't really know.

446
00:38:46,544 --> 00:38:51,984
I find the whole landscape of geopolitics kind of very difficult to read right now.

447
00:38:52,344 --> 00:39:00,404
And, you know, although this war may seem on the face of it to be going not so well for

448
00:39:00,404 --> 00:39:05,664
Trump, I'm not sure whether this was actually planned anyway.

449
00:39:05,664 --> 00:39:11,904
You know, I mean, the real casualties that come out of this and not the US.

450
00:39:12,324 --> 00:39:15,564
The US is self-sufficient in energy.

451
00:39:16,164 --> 00:39:19,404
The real problem comes to Europe and also Asia.

452
00:39:19,584 --> 00:39:26,424
I mean, that's where the costs are going to be in terms of getting oil or gas again.

453
00:39:26,424 --> 00:39:36,424
And what it really means is you need a reset of maybe energy politics worldwide.

454
00:39:38,004 --> 00:39:48,464
And it may well be this could be a precursor for somehow getting Russia back into the world system, partially the Ukraine crisis.

455
00:39:48,684 --> 00:39:53,664
But I mean, at the end of the day, maybe this is what happens longer term.

456
00:39:54,104 --> 00:39:55,324
I don't know.

457
00:39:55,324 --> 00:40:01,684
But as far as I can see, actually, the US is in a much better position than maybe a lot of the media kind of suggest.

458
00:40:02,244 --> 00:40:06,564
Now, that's obviously predicated on the fact that we don't have a particularly hot war.

459
00:40:07,124 --> 00:40:11,404
But, you know, nonetheless, I think the US is pretty much OK here.

460
00:40:12,164 --> 00:40:15,924
I think as regards China, what does it do for China?

461
00:40:15,924 --> 00:40:27,864
I would tend to think that what this is broadly doing is bringing the US and China maybe closer together paradoxically

462
00:40:27,864 --> 00:40:39,364
because I think it shows that there is a need or there's an impossibility of decoupling in a sort of a decent or workable way.

463
00:40:40,024 --> 00:40:44,064
So I think this is almost emphasizing the interconnectivity of the world.

464
00:40:44,064 --> 00:40:49,564
Now, that may seem a certainly non-consensual view, but that's how I would see it.

465
00:40:49,644 --> 00:41:01,744
Now, if you kind of put the currency question on top of that, it probably does, having said that, accelerate this movement towards a bifurcated system.

466
00:41:01,924 --> 00:41:06,744
Because China will have to make its own economy and financial system more robust.

467
00:41:06,744 --> 00:41:09,584
and the issue at the end of the day is that

468
00:41:09,584 --> 00:41:11,524
this goes back a long time

469
00:41:11,524 --> 00:41:13,944
and it goes back to the book I wrote

470
00:41:13,944 --> 00:41:16,324
called Capital Wars back about five years ago

471
00:41:16,324 --> 00:41:18,884
I mean the sort of

472
00:41:18,884 --> 00:41:21,024
maybe the sort of takeaway from that

473
00:41:21,024 --> 00:41:22,684
in many cases was that

474
00:41:22,684 --> 00:41:26,064
China was leaning far too heavily on the dollar system

475
00:41:26,064 --> 00:41:29,404
China was, I don't want to say a dollarized system

476
00:41:29,404 --> 00:41:31,004
but it wasn't far off bad

477
00:41:31,004 --> 00:41:32,964
it was very dependent on the US

478
00:41:32,964 --> 00:41:35,924
and it was trying to get away from that

479
00:41:35,924 --> 00:41:51,744
And, you know, they've made small steps so far, but they may have to accelerate that rather more. And I think the only way that they can really do that to create a viable financial system is to use as collateral an asset that internationally we all understand.

480
00:41:52,424 --> 00:41:58,864
Now, the US has got the advantage of using the US Treasury bond as a backing for the dollar.

481
00:41:58,864 --> 00:42:04,344
And that really is what is sort of backing, ultimately, the collateral that backs the dollar system.

482
00:42:05,004 --> 00:42:06,064
What has China got?

483
00:42:06,104 --> 00:42:07,264
Well, OK, it's got a bond market.

484
00:42:07,364 --> 00:42:08,684
It hasn't got an international bond market.

485
00:42:09,144 --> 00:42:11,264
The Chinese bond market is big, but it's really domestic.

486
00:42:11,704 --> 00:42:15,704
The only asset that they could use to benchmark the yuan would be gold.

487
00:42:16,144 --> 00:42:19,344
And I think what they're doing at the moment is a very, very tricky exercise.

488
00:42:19,344 --> 00:42:24,344
where, in my view, they're trying to devalue the yuan internally

489
00:42:24,344 --> 00:42:27,184
because of this huge debt problem they've got.

490
00:42:27,244 --> 00:42:31,684
And let's not forget the fact that whatever we may say about Western debt

491
00:42:31,684 --> 00:42:34,084
or US federal debt or whatever it may be,

492
00:42:34,364 --> 00:42:35,404
China's got a bigger problem.

493
00:42:35,984 --> 00:42:39,264
They've got much, much more debt, and it's in the wrong places.

494
00:42:39,484 --> 00:42:42,844
It's burdening the private sector, and they need to get out of that.

495
00:42:43,364 --> 00:42:56,666
And the only way they can seriously get out of that is to devalue debt because in modern financial systems defaults are ruled out because effectively defaulting debt you defaulting your collateral

496
00:42:56,666 --> 00:43:03,626
that backs the system. And the paradox here is that you need old debts to create new credit.

497
00:43:04,426 --> 00:43:10,506
And that's the fact of the system. So there's no way they could default. They've really got to

498
00:43:10,506 --> 00:43:15,046
devalued debt. And that's what I think they're doing. And that's what I think all the increases,

499
00:43:15,166 --> 00:43:21,966
and I can demonstrate with a chart, this is what China is basically doing. This is the net

500
00:43:21,966 --> 00:43:28,806
liquidity injections by the People's Bank in China. This is actually, to be accurate, this is

501
00:43:28,806 --> 00:43:34,386
the year-on-year change of liquidity injections. So this is the increment that they're adding to

502
00:43:34,386 --> 00:43:39,546
the markets each year. So you can see this is climbing quite significantly. And what we're

503
00:43:39,546 --> 00:43:45,666
talking about is a figure here, which is close to a trillion dollars a year. So, you know, these are

504
00:43:45,666 --> 00:43:52,346
big amounts of liquidity put in. And, you know, just to think here that the US Federal Reserve's

505
00:43:52,346 --> 00:43:58,386
balance sheet or the effective balance sheet, you know, let's say bank reserves are three trillion.

506
00:43:58,886 --> 00:44:04,186
So, you know, China is adding a third of that every year to its financial system. So these are

507
00:44:04,186 --> 00:44:09,506
big amounts. And, you know, one of the things that we've said before is that, you know, what

508
00:44:09,506 --> 00:44:14,606
they're trying to do is to devalue money internally in China, while at the same time trying to

509
00:44:14,606 --> 00:44:21,966
maintain the external value of the yuan as best they can. Now, that is a very, very tricky exercise.

510
00:44:22,326 --> 00:44:27,646
And I hope they pull it off, but it's kind of a difficult one. And what that really means is

511
00:44:27,646 --> 00:44:32,206
that if you look at this chart, what it's showing, and this is out of date now because,

512
00:44:32,206 --> 00:44:39,266
I mean, the gold price is moving so fast. In fact, the orange line is down testing 30,000

513
00:44:39,266 --> 00:44:43,906
in the last two or three days. So you've had a big sell-off in gold, fair enough. But let's just

514
00:44:43,906 --> 00:44:50,266
look at the trend here. What you're looking at is a huge increase in the yuan gold price over that

515
00:44:50,266 --> 00:44:57,306
period. And that has been basically the result of the Chinese printing lots of money. So let's not

516
00:44:57,306 --> 00:45:02,626
get carried away with the idea that the West is debasing its monetary system, which it may well

517
00:45:02,626 --> 00:45:08,546
be doing in the long term. China is doing it at a much faster rate. And that probably explains why

518
00:45:08,546 --> 00:45:15,686
the gold market has gone up so much. And what this chant here identifies is Chinese PBOC liquidity

519
00:45:15,686 --> 00:45:21,886
injections, which is the black line, and the orange line is the price of gold. Now, is it really the

520
00:45:21,886 --> 00:45:28,866
West that's been driving the gold market or is it China? Well, if you talk to gold traders and

521
00:45:28,866 --> 00:45:35,426
gold investors, they will tell you that the marginal price is the Shanghai Exchange, no longer COMEX

522
00:45:35,426 --> 00:45:41,266
or the London market. The central gravity has very clearly moved towards Asia. And that's what

523
00:45:41,266 --> 00:45:46,286
I think is going on. So what you're seeing is the paradox simultaneously of the Chinese retail

524
00:45:46,286 --> 00:45:52,146
investor buying gold to protect against domestic monetary inflation. And at the same time,

525
00:45:52,146 --> 00:45:56,046
the Chinese government buying gold to maintain the external value of the yuan.

526
00:45:56,686 --> 00:46:04,506
So they can, at some stage, offer notional gold, maybe gold oil exchanges or whatever it may be,

527
00:46:04,506 --> 00:46:06,406
whatever they want to do, gold, copper or whatever.

528
00:46:06,726 --> 00:46:10,426
They could do that with selected countries in much the same way

529
00:46:10,426 --> 00:46:14,946
as the old gold exchange standard operated in the 1950s and 60s.

530
00:46:15,346 --> 00:46:19,526
So it was only central banks that could basically get access to full nox.

531
00:46:20,146 --> 00:46:22,346
And that was highly selective.

532
00:46:22,866 --> 00:46:25,766
And it's going to be exactly the same in China's case.

533
00:46:25,766 --> 00:46:30,426
So maybe the Saudis could do the odd deal, oil and gold,

534
00:46:30,806 --> 00:46:33,006
but this is not going to be offered to everybody.

535
00:46:33,206 --> 00:46:34,026
Very selective.

536
00:46:34,026 --> 00:46:37,746
And that maybe gives a benchmark for what the yuan, what will back the yuan.

537
00:46:38,446 --> 00:46:40,526
So I think that you're getting this process.

538
00:46:41,066 --> 00:46:54,006
And China has very, very clearly put a marker down to say that it is not doing, that is not, you know, going the same route as the US, which is digital cryptocurrency for the yuan.

539
00:46:54,546 --> 00:46:58,126
It may be doing it internally, but they're certainly not doing it externally.

540
00:46:58,706 --> 00:47:02,506
And, of course, they've got capital controls, which makes it doubly difficult.

541
00:47:02,506 --> 00:47:14,886
Gotcha. Fantastic. As we round out, and thank you for the explanation, as we round out the show here in the next 10 minutes, one thing I wanted to ask you is about sort of the evolving relationship between the Fed and the U.S. Treasury.

542
00:47:15,886 --> 00:47:32,786
I think you were on with Jack Farley in talking about this and sort of laying out the case for why the Fed is sort of becoming less important relative to the Treasury as they sort of become one of the sort of take the reins, if you will, as far as the main monetary policy engine through bill issuance and stable coins.

543
00:47:32,786 --> 00:47:45,366
You know, if that is the case as we move forward, what does that mean for how investors should think about Fed meetings and rate decisions as we move sort of into this new regime, this new Fed Treasury accord, if you will?

544
00:47:45,366 --> 00:47:52,146
Well, I think the whole, as you rightly suggest, I mean, what we're getting is a shift in

545
00:47:52,146 --> 00:47:53,126
favor of the Treasury.

546
00:47:54,326 --> 00:48:01,706
The Federal Reserve, I mean, the whole intention or the tenor of what the incoming Fed chair

547
00:48:01,706 --> 00:48:07,946
Kevin Walsh is talking about is to reduce the size of the footprint of the Fed to basically

548
00:48:07,946 --> 00:48:14,586
try and cut its wings or clip its wings because the Fed is sort of straying into too many

549
00:48:14,586 --> 00:48:15,006
areas.

550
00:48:15,006 --> 00:48:23,926
I mean, we probably all acknowledge that. And it really needs a smaller footprint in that sense, maybe philosophically.

551
00:48:24,486 --> 00:48:30,846
As I've said, it's kind of difficult when you're talking about managing the financial system to have a smaller balance sheet.

552
00:48:31,126 --> 00:48:37,626
But in terms of the direction of policy, I think that that is probably a pretty good summary of the trend.

553
00:48:38,166 --> 00:48:40,186
Now, what does that mean in practice?

554
00:48:40,186 --> 00:48:48,006
I mean, one of the ways that we described that before was to say you're getting a shift from Fed QE towards Treasury QE.

555
00:48:48,486 --> 00:48:58,906
And what we meant by that is the Fed's ability to inject or maybe the Fed's willingness, I should say, to inject a lot of liquidity into the system is being compromised.

556
00:48:59,666 --> 00:49:06,086
And the Treasurer's ability to inject liquidity has been enhanced by bill issuance.

557
00:49:06,086 --> 00:49:12,006
Because as I alluded to before, if they issue a lot of bills, they tend to be bought at the margin by banks.

558
00:49:12,386 --> 00:49:17,086
And if the banks buy any form of government debt, that is monetization, that's printing money.

559
00:49:17,446 --> 00:49:27,046
But the difference here is that when the Fed injects liquidity, it is spraying it everywhere, particularly through financial markets, and asset prices tend to go up.

560
00:49:27,046 --> 00:49:36,786
When the treasury creates liquidity and spends it, it spends it in the real economy on real things and it tends to – for the most part, real things.

561
00:49:37,166 --> 00:49:53,866
And it tends to buy things like defense procurement, strategic stakes in US tech companies, critical minerals or whatever, these sort of things which are much more creative of economic growth rather than asset price inflation.

562
00:49:53,866 --> 00:49:57,206
So I think that's one of the ways to think about it in terms of liquidity.

563
00:49:57,586 --> 00:50:01,966
In terms of interest rates, I think we just need a fundamental rethink about what's going on.

564
00:50:02,306 --> 00:50:06,846
And that may be difficult to rewrite textbooks or unlearn economics in the short term.

565
00:50:07,266 --> 00:50:10,546
But the fact of the matter is that what do interest rates mean?

566
00:50:10,946 --> 00:50:15,106
If the Federal Reserve is saying, well, OK, we're going to raise interest rates, what are they trying to do?

567
00:50:15,426 --> 00:50:23,146
Because in a world where you've got the private sector in strong surplus and you've got the government sector in more frequent deficit,

568
00:50:23,146 --> 00:50:30,546
It means something different than the old model where households were at surplus and the corporate sector was a borrower in deficit.

569
00:50:31,066 --> 00:50:38,726
And in that world, when the corporate sector wanted to invest and it needs to borrow money, interest rates were the arbiter of that process.

570
00:50:38,966 --> 00:50:45,146
So higher interest rates slowed capital spending and slowed the economy and encouraged more savings and vice versa.

571
00:50:45,686 --> 00:50:47,266
But that's not the world we're in, OK?

572
00:50:48,166 --> 00:50:52,286
There's no sort of big capex going on really in the West,

573
00:50:52,526 --> 00:50:55,346
apart from this AI boom, but that's coming out of cash flows.

574
00:50:56,246 --> 00:51:00,266
Most of the investment is being done in Asia and in particularly China,

575
00:51:00,486 --> 00:51:03,006
where interest rates are not really that important anyway.

576
00:51:03,406 --> 00:51:05,646
So that's not the world we live in.

577
00:51:05,646 --> 00:51:08,226
We live in a world where governments are in deficit,

578
00:51:08,606 --> 00:51:09,926
private sector is in surplus,

579
00:51:10,366 --> 00:51:13,686
interest rates affect the government interest bill,

580
00:51:14,066 --> 00:51:17,106
and that is a transfer payment from the government sector,

581
00:51:17,106 --> 00:51:19,126
to the public sector, to the private sector.

582
00:51:19,506 --> 00:51:20,706
So actually, if you think about it,

583
00:51:20,746 --> 00:51:23,926
if the government is basically issuing lots of bills

584
00:51:23,926 --> 00:51:26,786
and the Federal Reserve is raising interest rates,

585
00:51:27,966 --> 00:51:31,206
the transfer payments to the private sector start to go up, not down.

586
00:51:31,666 --> 00:51:34,906
That's a monetary or income stimulus, isn't it?

587
00:51:35,086 --> 00:51:35,826
Not a contraction.

588
00:51:36,426 --> 00:51:39,246
So the whole world has kind of turned topsy-turvy.

589
00:51:39,746 --> 00:51:42,846
And this is what I think needs to be rethought.

590
00:51:42,846 --> 00:51:45,826
But it's very difficult with the Federal Reserve to reeducate,

591
00:51:45,826 --> 00:51:48,726
300 million people that easily.

592
00:51:49,666 --> 00:51:50,986
Very, very well said.

593
00:51:52,246 --> 00:51:54,566
Last thing I'll sort of say for you,

594
00:51:54,786 --> 00:51:56,946
to make this practical for our listeners,

595
00:51:57,066 --> 00:51:59,106
obviously lots of information we discussed today.

596
00:51:59,626 --> 00:52:02,766
Oil completely raging, the Iran war,

597
00:52:03,326 --> 00:52:05,446
sort of will they, won't they, and this thing.

598
00:52:05,966 --> 00:52:08,246
Trump is saying one thing, the state is saying another.

599
00:52:08,846 --> 00:52:11,546
Wars coming in in just two months, liquidity on the decline.

600
00:52:12,346 --> 00:52:14,766
Walk us through how you're thinking of asset allocation

601
00:52:14,766 --> 00:52:17,866
given the backdrop of where we are in the global liquidity cycle right now.

602
00:52:17,886 --> 00:52:22,866
Let me go on to the cycle and where we are, and I'll just finish off on that.

603
00:52:23,246 --> 00:52:24,986
So we think of the cycle in this way.

604
00:52:25,446 --> 00:52:28,886
This is really a schematic version of the cycle that we saw.

605
00:52:30,226 --> 00:52:33,666
And this is saying that around the peaks, you want commodities.

606
00:52:34,306 --> 00:52:35,186
That's where we've been.

607
00:52:35,886 --> 00:52:37,106
In the upswings, you want equities.

608
00:52:37,186 --> 00:52:38,606
In the downswings, you want cash.

609
00:52:38,946 --> 00:52:41,446
At the low points, you want government fixed income.

610
00:52:41,446 --> 00:52:42,486
You want bond duration.

611
00:52:42,486 --> 00:52:45,926
and you basically shift around in that fashion.

612
00:52:46,306 --> 00:52:48,106
And we look at it in terms of traffic lights.

613
00:52:48,666 --> 00:52:51,506
So traffic lights, what you see is what you get.

614
00:52:51,746 --> 00:52:56,626
So green is go, red is stop, and amber is proceed with caution.

615
00:52:57,226 --> 00:53:01,566
And what that's basically saying is you've got four phases of the liquidity cycle.

616
00:53:02,046 --> 00:53:04,106
Rebound and calm are the upswing phases.

617
00:53:04,666 --> 00:53:06,826
Speculation and turbulence are the downswing phases.

618
00:53:07,246 --> 00:53:11,466
The US market is well embedded in speculation as far as we can see.

619
00:53:11,466 --> 00:53:16,106
And if you look at the left-hand side of the chart, those traffic lights are assets.

620
00:53:16,606 --> 00:53:19,386
The right-hand traffic lights are industry groups.

621
00:53:20,146 --> 00:53:25,186
And what that's pretty much saying is if you're in speculation, you want to be paring down your equities.

622
00:53:26,406 --> 00:53:28,286
Obviously, in turbulence, you don't want equities.

623
00:53:28,466 --> 00:53:29,946
That's a very low allocation of red.

624
00:53:30,806 --> 00:53:32,526
Credits, you don't want in speculation.

625
00:53:33,926 --> 00:53:39,026
Ironically, you can pick up credits in turbulence because spreads have already widened significantly.

626
00:53:39,026 --> 00:53:43,226
So you've got a pretty good yield cushion at that stage, but you certainly haven't now.

627
00:53:44,126 --> 00:53:45,966
Commodities still look good in speculation.

628
00:53:46,886 --> 00:53:49,466
Bond duration, probably you want toe in the water.

629
00:53:49,606 --> 00:53:51,866
That's beginning to come right as the yield curve flattens.

630
00:53:52,326 --> 00:53:56,286
And by the time you get to turbulence, you want basically more bonds.

631
00:53:57,346 --> 00:54:02,846
If you look at – and by the way, this is a tactical or cyclical view.

632
00:54:03,186 --> 00:54:06,006
It's not – in the long term, I'm not a bond investor.

633
00:54:06,006 --> 00:54:08,206
But in the short term, I certainly am.

634
00:54:09,026 --> 00:54:11,766
and not in the long term because of monetary inflation risks.

635
00:54:12,086 --> 00:54:14,006
But if you then look at industry groups,

636
00:54:14,366 --> 00:54:19,886
what that's really saying is you want cyclicals in the upswings of the cycle,

637
00:54:20,026 --> 00:54:20,766
rebound, calm.

638
00:54:20,886 --> 00:54:24,706
You want defensives in the speculation turbulence phase.

639
00:54:25,706 --> 00:54:28,586
The cyclicals basically run from technology immediately.

640
00:54:28,726 --> 00:54:29,886
You don't want technology now.

641
00:54:29,886 --> 00:54:32,486
You've got to be out of technology, as that red dot says.

642
00:54:33,066 --> 00:54:35,186
Financials, you should be paring down quite quickly

643
00:54:35,186 --> 00:54:38,446
because the yield curve is flattening and credit risks are rising.

644
00:54:39,026 --> 00:54:44,766
energy commodities still are pretty good. And you want to be starting to move towards defensives,

645
00:54:44,766 --> 00:54:49,346
which are consumer staples, utilities, etc. And that's pretty much how we're doing that.

646
00:54:50,726 --> 00:54:57,366
And I haven't put gold or Bitcoin in this particular configuration, because I think

647
00:54:57,366 --> 00:55:02,046
those are long-term assets, in my view. They should be core holdings and portfolios.

648
00:55:02,746 --> 00:55:07,266
But you don't necessarily want to trade those, you want to own them. But my view, as I said,

649
00:55:07,266 --> 00:55:12,086
probably Joe at the beginning, is that buying them on weakness is a fairly decent strategy.

650
00:55:12,726 --> 00:55:15,946
It's always difficult to catch a falling night. But I would generally say,

651
00:55:16,366 --> 00:55:20,806
you want to be buying these things when they're about 20% or at least a standard deviation below

652
00:55:20,806 --> 00:55:25,086
their trends. Fantastic. Michael, thank you very much for laying all of that out. I think,

653
00:55:25,086 --> 00:55:31,886
for our viewers in particular, with Bitcoin being down 45% gold now coming off its highs,

654
00:55:32,006 --> 00:55:36,246
equities beginning to roll over, there's a great deal of confusion. So it's always so valuable to

655
00:55:36,246 --> 00:55:41,466
have you on because you can very cleanly articulate what's happening in markets and sort of where we

656
00:55:41,466 --> 00:55:44,686
are from a cyclical perspective, which is what everybody needs to do. They need to zoom out

657
00:55:44,686 --> 00:55:49,486
and stop being day traders, become people who are allocating for years and decades.

658
00:55:50,206 --> 00:55:52,966
Michael, I really appreciate it as always. Before we wrap up here,

659
00:55:53,126 --> 00:55:55,706
where can people go to find more of your work and follow along?

660
00:55:56,686 --> 00:56:03,866
Well, probably the easiest route is to look at the capital walls sub-stake. We write three to

661
00:56:03,866 --> 00:56:07,146
four times a week on what's happening in markets and provide data.

662
00:56:08,146 --> 00:56:13,666
There is an institutional service which you can get either via cross-bordercapital.com

663
00:56:13,666 --> 00:56:15,386
or glindexes.com.

664
00:56:15,986 --> 00:56:18,246
GL Index is a pure data provider.

665
00:56:19,546 --> 00:56:25,746
Or you can, if you want to read a book about what was, well, what is going on in the financial

666
00:56:25,746 --> 00:56:26,106
market.

667
00:56:26,106 --> 00:56:27,806
So it was written about four or five years ago.

668
00:56:27,806 --> 00:56:36,266
So then Capital Wars, the same name as the sub-stack, is the book published by Mellon in 2020.

669
00:56:37,306 --> 00:56:37,706
Fantastic.

670
00:56:37,886 --> 00:56:39,086
Michael, I appreciate it as always.

671
00:56:39,186 --> 00:56:41,926
And for the viewers and listeners of the program, that will be linked.

672
00:56:42,146 --> 00:56:45,226
All of those will be linked in the show description and the show notes.

673
00:56:45,726 --> 00:56:47,066
Michael, we really appreciate it.

674
00:56:47,766 --> 00:56:48,246
Great.

675
00:56:48,426 --> 00:56:49,546
Thank you, Joe.

676
00:56:49,666 --> 00:56:50,446
Enjoy the normalcy.

677
00:56:50,446 --> 00:56:52,726
And then there's a point which does nothing.

678
00:56:53,126 --> 00:56:54,286
Bitcoin or something like that.

679
00:56:55,346 --> 00:56:57,066
Bitcoin is 17 years old.

680
00:56:57,066 --> 00:57:02,746
I could kill less with Bitcoin trades for.