1
00:00:00,017 --> 00:00:02,757
Okay, so a lot of people have been talking about the halving,

2
00:00:02,797 --> 00:00:05,797
and I want to raise that because the most important thing that people need to

3
00:00:05,797 --> 00:00:09,597
understand about the halving is that it marks another milestone in Bitcoin's

4
00:00:09,597 --> 00:00:13,957
programmatic monetary policy that is set in stone and completely transparent.

5
00:00:14,277 --> 00:00:19,377
Look at the U.S. Our broad money supply increases at about 7% annualized since

6
00:00:19,377 --> 00:00:23,457
the 1960s, diluting everyone's savings, everyone's chasing yields,

7
00:00:23,577 --> 00:00:28,197
and no one knows what the monetary policy is going to be in four years, much less 10 or 20.

8
00:00:28,197 --> 00:00:32,897
With Bitcoin, we know exactly what the supply will be. Everyone can verify it.

9
00:00:32,997 --> 00:00:38,077
And Bitcoin is disinflationary. So as of this halving, it's going to become harder than gold.

10
00:00:38,197 --> 00:00:43,537
And with every halving, the American dream is getting cheaper in terms of Bitcoin.

11
00:00:43,537 --> 00:00:48,057
My dream home once cost like 600 Bitcoin and then it was 100 and then 50.

12
00:00:48,177 --> 00:00:51,597
And now it's approaching single digits because Bitcoin will continue to reprice

13
00:00:51,597 --> 00:00:53,657
everything in the existing system.

14
00:00:53,817 --> 00:00:57,897
And it's giving a lot of young people hope that they will be able to provide

15
00:00:57,897 --> 00:01:00,957
for themselves and for their future descendants.

16
00:01:01,477 --> 00:01:03,417
With fiat, they can't do that anymore.

17
00:01:02,800 --> 00:01:14,960
Music.

18
00:01:14,557 --> 00:01:20,077
Welcome to episode seven of this week in Bitcoin and happy 2024 happening.

19
00:01:20,197 --> 00:01:24,537
This is Bitcoin's fourth happening, just as this episode releases block height

20
00:01:24,537 --> 00:01:26,537
840,000 was just reached.

21
00:01:26,757 --> 00:01:34,177
And it's a big one. The minor reward gets cut down to 3.125 Bitcoin, which is down from 6.25.

22
00:01:34,737 --> 00:01:40,097
And I feel like Bitcoin is more positioned this epoch than maybe ever before.

23
00:01:40,437 --> 00:01:44,397
Like I just see an incredible four years ahead of Bitcoin. Definitely some challenges

24
00:01:44,397 --> 00:01:50,177
and some trials, which we will now no doubt document as time goes on, unfortunately.

25
00:01:50,877 --> 00:01:54,717
But also, you have a scarcity factor kicking in. That's just,

26
00:01:54,777 --> 00:01:57,657
it's getting really, really tight now, whereas the previous halvenings.

27
00:01:58,634 --> 00:02:01,454
We just didn't really see the market demand that was eating up the Bitcoin at

28
00:02:01,454 --> 00:02:03,494
this rate because also these ETFs have come out.

29
00:02:03,734 --> 00:02:07,934
But also, I can say without a doubt, the end of this epoch is being watched

30
00:02:07,934 --> 00:02:10,354
more than ever in Bitcoin's history.

31
00:02:10,594 --> 00:02:15,034
In the past, it was only celebrated by a few of the cryptocurrency's biggest cheerleaders.

32
00:02:15,294 --> 00:02:17,674
This year, though, the halving is a hot topic.

33
00:02:17,954 --> 00:02:22,454
Sometime in the next 12, 18 months, you know, Bitcoin can be over $150,000.

34
00:02:22,554 --> 00:02:26,794
Around the halving, where the amount of Bitcoin coming to market is cut in half.

35
00:02:26,794 --> 00:02:31,014
After that time period, you see another year of a bull market.

36
00:02:31,254 --> 00:02:32,434
And the reason for all the attention?

37
00:02:32,794 --> 00:02:36,634
There are way more people who care about and invest in Bitcoin than there were

38
00:02:36,634 --> 00:02:38,494
in 2020 during the last halving.

39
00:02:38,754 --> 00:02:42,474
That's thanks to a wave of adoption during the last cycle and new investment

40
00:02:42,474 --> 00:02:45,734
options for crypto-curious investors like Spot ETFs.

41
00:02:45,834 --> 00:02:49,614
This was the defining moment, I think, of Bitcoin, at least,

42
00:02:49,654 --> 00:02:52,014
right, in this era of its history.

43
00:02:52,214 --> 00:02:58,494
This was its kind of IPO-like moment. Pandora's box is now open for institutional

44
00:02:58,494 --> 00:03:00,114
adoption of the asset class.

45
00:03:16,072 --> 00:03:19,272
But also because of the impact it'll have on the mining industry itself,

46
00:03:19,432 --> 00:03:21,392
which is almost where it's going to be felt immediately.

47
00:03:21,712 --> 00:03:25,732
Bitcoin miners are preparing for the network's biggest event in four years.

48
00:03:26,072 --> 00:03:29,832
We have a halving coming up here, and Riot has a number of ambitious growth

49
00:03:29,832 --> 00:03:32,512
plans that we're scaling up our business with.

50
00:03:32,632 --> 00:03:37,052
So as the price of Bitcoin appreciates, we should appreciate from that in an outsized way.

51
00:03:37,332 --> 00:03:42,052
The rally in Bitcoin really is what's keeping miners in business today when

52
00:03:42,052 --> 00:03:45,372
you think about post-halving. The average cost to mine in Bitcoin is somewhere

53
00:03:45,372 --> 00:03:48,932
around between $20,000, $25,000 a Bitcoin.

54
00:03:49,072 --> 00:03:54,112
Currently, post the halving, that'll go to somewhere between $37,000,

55
00:03:54,172 --> 00:03:59,592
$45,000 a Bitcoin, maybe $50,000 a Bitcoin in some cases for some miners.

56
00:03:59,792 --> 00:04:04,672
And with the Bitcoin price being at $67,000, $68,000, $70,000,

57
00:04:04,672 --> 00:04:07,032
it means that miners are still mining profitably.

58
00:04:07,292 --> 00:04:11,772
Though what it really means is the miners with large scale will be able to mine

59
00:04:11,772 --> 00:04:14,852
profitably. The smaller miners will be put under more pressure.

60
00:04:15,012 --> 00:04:20,412
This is big. The small miners don't have the capacity to buy up the equipment,

61
00:04:20,592 --> 00:04:22,852
the data centers, and failing miners.

62
00:04:23,332 --> 00:04:27,412
That's how these larger operations are going to survive, is they will absorb

63
00:04:27,412 --> 00:04:31,032
some of the smaller mining operations that couldn't cut it post-having.

64
00:04:31,192 --> 00:04:35,932
Large scale will be able to mine profitably. The smaller miners will be put under more pressure.

65
00:04:36,092 --> 00:04:40,092
I think that we will see failures in this space. You know, we already saw in

66
00:04:40,092 --> 00:04:44,392
the last market, there were a couple bankruptcies, both in the public and the private space.

67
00:04:44,732 --> 00:04:47,552
I think we're going to see that again. So I think that there's going to be great

68
00:04:47,552 --> 00:04:49,632
opportunity on an M&A basis.

69
00:04:49,912 --> 00:04:54,572
We're thinking about the facilities or the data centers that miners are operating in.

70
00:04:54,732 --> 00:04:58,792
If there's a data center full of old equipment that is no longer efficient,

71
00:04:59,152 --> 00:05:02,072
we'd love to buy the facility and move in. Oh, they're snapping them up.

72
00:05:02,652 --> 00:05:07,052
Marathon mining, all of the big ones are snapping up data centers and contracts.

73
00:05:08,492 --> 00:05:12,332
Just massive, massive head start on this stuff this year because they knew it was coming.

74
00:05:13,245 --> 00:05:16,565
It's an uncertain world, but the one thing that's certain is the Bitcoin time

75
00:05:16,565 --> 00:05:18,145
chain. So they knew what was coming.

76
00:05:18,525 --> 00:05:22,365
You know, it's hard to say what happens from here, where we go from here,

77
00:05:22,445 --> 00:05:26,645
other than over time, history shows us usually Bitcoin's price rallies.

78
00:05:26,745 --> 00:05:31,625
And that's what makes it sustainable for these miners is they have to make their

79
00:05:31,625 --> 00:05:32,725
operations more efficient.

80
00:05:33,085 --> 00:05:38,325
Some of them will fail. But generally, you know, 12 to 18 months after the halvening,

81
00:05:38,345 --> 00:05:43,905
the price is generally rallied. and that differential makes it possible for

82
00:05:43,905 --> 00:05:46,345
these miners that remain to be profitable.

83
00:05:47,605 --> 00:05:52,065
Now, will we see a price rally? It's all a matter of probables,

84
00:05:52,125 --> 00:05:54,405
right? We don't really know. It's all probability-based.

85
00:05:55,125 --> 00:05:59,125
If the Fed were to cut rates in a month or two, I think it's almost a surefire

86
00:05:59,125 --> 00:06:04,005
bet that when you factor in ETF demand, post-halving scarcity,

87
00:06:04,305 --> 00:06:09,305
and a rate cut, so money gets looser, liquidity gets free, I think it's,

88
00:06:09,305 --> 00:06:10,105
of course, you're going to see a rally.

89
00:06:11,165 --> 00:06:14,905
But at this point, with inflation still running hot, I think it's just something

90
00:06:14,905 --> 00:06:16,165
that has to be kept on our radar,

91
00:06:16,285 --> 00:06:19,525
although it seems like the most unlikely scenario in an election year,

92
00:06:19,605 --> 00:06:24,865
but it still remains probable the Fed could always raise rates or not cut rates

93
00:06:24,865 --> 00:06:27,945
this year at all, which seems perhaps the most probable to me.

94
00:06:28,985 --> 00:06:34,305
The most probable move, in my opinion, would be to just keep rates where they're

95
00:06:34,305 --> 00:06:37,285
at, which keeps inflation running kind of hot.

96
00:06:37,905 --> 00:06:41,465
But it's the least political move the Fed could make during an election year.

97
00:06:42,225 --> 00:06:45,425
And if they were to cut rates, inflation would start to run hot again.

98
00:06:45,925 --> 00:06:50,705
If they were to raise rates, it would be political suicide for the current White House.

99
00:06:50,765 --> 00:06:55,605
But it also would be extremely hard on small banks and commercial real estate.

100
00:06:57,025 --> 00:07:00,165
And it would also be hard on the average person because credit card rates would

101
00:07:00,165 --> 00:07:03,985
go up as well. So there's really no good solution for them.

102
00:07:04,205 --> 00:07:08,525
But if they were to raise rates, it would probably stunt Bitcoin's rally.

103
00:07:09,085 --> 00:07:13,225
But I think all of it's just short term. When you zoom out, we're looking at

104
00:07:13,225 --> 00:07:14,485
that this is a four-year cycle.

105
00:07:15,565 --> 00:07:22,605
And what everybody's talking about today is what this last four years really brought for them.

106
00:07:22,705 --> 00:07:25,025
And I think that's kind of a really neat thing about Bitcoin,

107
00:07:25,225 --> 00:07:29,045
is that we all get to kind of celebrate this moment together around the world.

108
00:07:30,185 --> 00:07:33,265
And I'd like you to boost into the show and tell me what you were doing last

109
00:07:33,265 --> 00:07:35,785
happening. Four years ago, were you paying attention?

110
00:07:36,465 --> 00:07:39,485
Were you in Bitcoin yet? I flipped through my photos,

111
00:07:40,345 --> 00:07:44,705
to kind of look back and see what I was doing and I'll be honest with you,

112
00:07:44,725 --> 00:07:49,105
the first photo I came across actually was a sign for COVID that a business

113
00:07:49,105 --> 00:07:51,865
put up, a local business here by the studio put up saying, we're closed,

114
00:07:52,005 --> 00:07:56,345
but we think we'll be open in two weeks and that business is no longer there.

115
00:07:57,045 --> 00:08:00,265
So I, oh, wow, yeah, okay. okay, that's been a crazy four years.

116
00:08:00,925 --> 00:08:06,045
Something else I saw pretty close to that was a photo of our first garden,

117
00:08:06,125 --> 00:08:08,685
which we now almost run like a mini farm in the summer.

118
00:08:10,779 --> 00:08:14,779
At the last halving, we were starting our first garden. I'd love to know what

119
00:08:14,779 --> 00:08:17,839
you were doing or anything major that happened to you during this last epoch

120
00:08:17,839 --> 00:08:21,419
and where maybe you see things in 2028.

121
00:08:21,959 --> 00:08:26,399
So boost in with that. The halving is a moment for us to reflect,

122
00:08:26,999 --> 00:08:30,099
and it's something we all share together because the time chain tells us.

123
00:08:31,179 --> 00:08:34,179
Yes, time chain, yes. Something else we're talking a lot about,

124
00:08:34,239 --> 00:08:37,079
just moving right along, if I could do a brief transition.

125
00:08:39,479 --> 00:08:46,719
There is concern that high transaction fees will become normal post-Havening because of runes.

126
00:08:48,139 --> 00:08:51,019
Now, runes are the creation of Casey

127
00:08:51,019 --> 00:08:55,659
Road Armor, who announced the idea on September 25th of 2023 on his blog.

128
00:08:56,899 --> 00:09:01,419
And I think it's notable how he started his post.

129
00:09:01,559 --> 00:09:06,299
He said, quote, I'm not sure if creating a new fungible token protocol for Bitcoin is a good idea.

130
00:09:07,119 --> 00:09:10,759
Fungible tokens are 99.9% scams and memes.

131
00:09:11,279 --> 00:09:15,439
However, they don't appear to be going away anytime soon, similar to the way

132
00:09:15,439 --> 00:09:17,799
in which casinos don't appear to be going away anytime soon.

133
00:09:18,339 --> 00:09:22,639
Creating a good fungible token protocol for Bitcoin might bring significant

134
00:09:22,639 --> 00:09:27,799
transaction fee revenue, developer mindshare, and users to Bitcoin.

135
00:09:28,399 --> 00:09:32,159
Additionally, if this protocol had a small on-chain footprint and encouraged

136
00:09:32,159 --> 00:09:38,659
responsible UTXO management, it might serve as a harm reduction compared to existing protocols.

137
00:09:39,499 --> 00:09:45,179
In other words, people are going to shitcoin, so they might as well shitcoin on Bitcoin.

138
00:09:45,639 --> 00:09:50,839
And Bitcoin runes launched with Blockhite 840,000, along with the Havening.

139
00:09:51,239 --> 00:09:56,339
Runes utilize unspent transaction outputs, or UTXOs, as the foundation to issue

140
00:09:56,339 --> 00:10:02,539
fungible tokens and minimize, they say, junk UTXOs that BRC20 tokens and other attempts.

141
00:10:04,239 --> 00:10:07,939
Okay, KC is also known for ordinals. So give you a bit of a background there.

142
00:10:08,139 --> 00:10:11,419
The runes protocol uses operaturn to designate the token supply,

143
00:10:11,719 --> 00:10:15,299
the ID, and output to a specific UTXO.

144
00:10:16,159 --> 00:10:20,759
So a single operaturn output encodes all the rune messages, I call these runestones,

145
00:10:21,119 --> 00:10:26,679
in a transaction, including the etching, transferring, and what they call minting.

146
00:10:27,859 --> 00:10:31,519
Etching sets the governance rules and they're unchangeable once they're set

147
00:10:31,519 --> 00:10:34,259
but you can have some that can be pre-mined i believe you can have some that

148
00:10:34,259 --> 00:10:37,799
can be changed and transferred to others some that can't this is all in the

149
00:10:37,799 --> 00:10:43,059
etching process now there's a fee increase concern here because,

150
00:10:43,839 --> 00:10:48,599
i think people started talking about this when testnet started seeing transaction

151
00:10:48,599 --> 00:10:53,499
fees for a brief period of time that were higher than the main net so the testnet

152
00:10:53,499 --> 00:10:55,379
that's not really supposed supposed to have many people on it,

153
00:10:55,439 --> 00:10:58,259
started seeing higher transaction fees than mainnet.

154
00:10:59,299 --> 00:11:03,359
And that was because people were experimenting with these runes.

155
00:11:06,098 --> 00:11:10,338
And Casey puts it pretty well when he ends the blog post, which I'll have linked in the show notes.

156
00:11:10,638 --> 00:11:15,738
Casey finishes with, quote, Should such a thing exist? I don't know.

157
00:11:16,318 --> 00:11:20,218
It's about as simple as possible. It does not rely on off-chain data.

158
00:11:20,618 --> 00:11:25,578
It does not have a native token. And if it's nicely into Bitcoin's native UTXO model,

159
00:11:26,638 --> 00:11:30,758
such a scheme might draw users from other schemes with worse on-chain footprints

160
00:11:30,758 --> 00:11:35,938
prints and bring developer and user mindshare to Bitcoin, encouraging them to adopt Bitcoin itself.

161
00:11:36,298 --> 00:11:41,578
In other words, if we could become the mother asshole over on Bitcoin,

162
00:11:41,818 --> 00:11:43,398
perhaps we would drain them from the altcoins.

163
00:11:43,918 --> 00:11:47,678
As Saif has so well put it, Ethereum has really become known as,

164
00:11:47,798 --> 00:11:50,118
you know, a meme network.

165
00:11:50,338 --> 00:11:53,118
It's for toys. It's tokens. It's junk.

166
00:11:53,478 --> 00:11:58,598
Do you classify Ethereum as a shitcoin? For sure. It's the mother asshole from

167
00:11:58,598 --> 00:11:59,678
which the shitcoins spring.

168
00:12:00,758 --> 00:12:03,958
And, you know, RunePumpers are falling all over themselves, I'll note,

169
00:12:04,018 --> 00:12:07,798
to explain that bringing degen behavior to Bitcoin is great for Bitcoin.

170
00:12:08,398 --> 00:12:10,758
And they have all these examples of how it'll bring liquidity.

171
00:12:10,878 --> 00:12:14,258
It's like we're eating the bottom and we're taking care of some of the stuff

172
00:12:14,258 --> 00:12:17,318
and bringing money over and we're going to drain all of the energy out of altcoins

173
00:12:17,318 --> 00:12:18,998
and bring them into Bitcoin.

174
00:12:20,518 --> 00:12:25,398
I personally am not so sure about that. But it does seem likely to me that there

175
00:12:25,398 --> 00:12:28,958
is a potential reputational harm that could slow adoption among financially

176
00:12:28,958 --> 00:12:31,678
illiterate users or potential users of Bitcoin.

177
00:12:32,198 --> 00:12:35,918
And they're already spooked by anything to do with crypto.

178
00:12:36,438 --> 00:12:40,478
And one of the few things we can genuinely say is Bitcoin is not like any other crypto.

179
00:12:41,478 --> 00:12:46,878
But that won't necessarily be true now. So I think it's with great power comes great responsibility.

180
00:12:47,018 --> 00:12:51,458
And while it doesn't alter the fundamental monetary asset properties of Bitcoin

181
00:12:51,458 --> 00:12:56,338
and the utility of the Bitcoin network and the asset, it does potentially bring

182
00:12:56,338 --> 00:12:59,778
a type of behavior and attention we might not want. Then again.

183
00:13:01,993 --> 00:13:06,013
Maybe it will drain attention away from altcoins. Maybe it will bring more developers over.

184
00:13:07,573 --> 00:13:12,173
Maybe there's value in deciding some sats are worth more than others. I don't think so.

185
00:13:12,993 --> 00:13:16,273
But they have a whole method to determine, like, certain sats are worth more than others.

186
00:13:16,613 --> 00:13:20,193
The first sat after the halvening. The first sat after a difficulty adjustment,

187
00:13:20,513 --> 00:13:21,433
et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.

188
00:13:21,573 --> 00:13:26,333
And they have all these names for them and icons and symbols that make them special.

189
00:13:26,533 --> 00:13:28,793
And, you know, all these people are just into this.

190
00:13:29,073 --> 00:13:33,753
We've seen this kind of thing on Bitcoin many times. It's humans attributing

191
00:13:33,753 --> 00:13:35,653
value to individual sats that

192
00:13:35,653 --> 00:13:39,213
the Bitcoin network doesn't account for in the protocol or in the code.

193
00:13:39,673 --> 00:13:42,573
It's just humans sort of overlaying that.

194
00:13:43,433 --> 00:13:47,613
I don't know. There may be room for that. Where I try to frame it to give you

195
00:13:47,613 --> 00:13:53,213
just something to kind of lens this with, say you get married or maybe your

196
00:13:53,213 --> 00:13:54,753
offspring gets married or you buy

197
00:13:54,753 --> 00:13:58,393
a house or you start a business or some monumental moment in your life.

198
00:13:58,933 --> 00:14:03,473
Would you like to enshrine that in the blockchain in the time chain that lasts

199
00:14:03,473 --> 00:14:08,493
for say a thousand years that will outlast you and everyone you know is that

200
00:14:08,493 --> 00:14:11,133
appealing to sort of somehow,

201
00:14:11,933 --> 00:14:15,213
etch it into the blockchain because i think that's sort of the mentality i may

202
00:14:15,213 --> 00:14:18,273
have that wrong boosting if you think i've got that wrong but i think that's

203
00:14:18,273 --> 00:14:22,553
the appeals like you're saving this thing forever in the blockchain and unlike

204
00:14:22,553 --> 00:14:26,633
nfts where they're really just a url pointing to a jpeg on an HTTP endpoint,

205
00:14:27,513 --> 00:14:29,813
we're actually loading this crap into the blockchain, I think.

206
00:14:29,873 --> 00:14:31,893
So, you know, my node and your node is going to store it too.

207
00:14:33,186 --> 00:14:37,126
All right, moving right along. I'm going to try to remain open-minded,

208
00:14:37,186 --> 00:14:39,826
but that's my initial take on Runes. I'd like to hear yours.

209
00:14:40,046 --> 00:14:43,586
Coming up, your boost, some big project updates, clip of the week I really want

210
00:14:43,586 --> 00:14:45,706
you to hear, and a value for value track.

211
00:14:45,826 --> 00:14:48,806
But first, I want to thank Podhome.fm.

212
00:14:48,946 --> 00:14:51,226
That's my podcasting 2.0 hosting platform.

213
00:14:51,586 --> 00:14:55,546
I've seen many of you out there try it and love it. You get unlimited shows and episodes.

214
00:14:55,846 --> 00:14:58,926
It's got Podhome AI that'll help you automatically generate chapters,

215
00:14:59,206 --> 00:15:01,826
go through and even suggest titles and descriptions if you like.

216
00:15:01,826 --> 00:15:06,446
Like, and it has the easiest live streaming support for podcasting 2.0 with

217
00:15:06,446 --> 00:15:08,306
the audio hosting built right in.

218
00:15:08,466 --> 00:15:12,146
The UI makes it easy for remote elements like value-for-value music.

219
00:15:12,686 --> 00:15:18,366
Try it for free for three months. Use my promo code TWIB at pothome.fm.

220
00:15:18,626 --> 00:15:25,166
Promo code TWIB at pothome.fm, the best podcasting 2.0 hosting platform.

221
00:15:25,606 --> 00:15:29,506
And a big thank you to pothome.fm for sponsoring this here show.

222
00:15:30,006 --> 00:15:34,366
If you'd like to make a call, please hang up and try again. If you need help,

223
00:15:34,486 --> 00:15:36,306
hang up and then dial your operator.

224
00:15:38,246 --> 00:15:41,206
Now we do have some boosts to get into this week. Thank you, everybody.

225
00:15:41,426 --> 00:15:47,886
And Satsquatch is our baller booster this week with 50,000 sats. Hey, rich lobster!

226
00:15:50,286 --> 00:15:54,686
And he writes, Chris, I'm curious how many Bitcoin you traded for your studio gear.

227
00:15:54,786 --> 00:15:58,746
I'm sure it was worth it at the time more content on mining please appreciate

228
00:15:58,746 --> 00:16:02,286
all your coverage and tight show format well thank you for being our baller

229
00:16:02,286 --> 00:16:09,226
booster satsquash you're not going to believe me but i i think at the time it

230
00:16:09,226 --> 00:16:14,346
might have been almost four bitcoin for everything maybe more uh it was complicated,

231
00:16:14,846 --> 00:16:19,866
it's complicated it was not an ideal situation i suppose in retrospect uh i

232
00:16:19,866 --> 00:16:22,766
may have you know in total it was probably more than that though over the years

233
00:16:22,766 --> 00:16:25,646
there was really this mentality of you've got to sell your Bitcoin.

234
00:16:25,886 --> 00:16:28,726
That was really the big pushback then, is you've got to sell your Bitcoin.

235
00:16:29,346 --> 00:16:30,826
You've got to make it the next PayPal.

236
00:16:31,626 --> 00:16:33,546
And yeah, well, you're welcome.

237
00:16:35,246 --> 00:16:40,626
My contribution to the price. Are you okay? Deestalo, probably don't have that

238
00:16:40,626 --> 00:16:43,966
right, comes in with 35,769 sats.

239
00:16:44,306 --> 00:16:48,506
Aloha, Chris Lass. I've been a listener since the early Linux Action Show days.

240
00:16:48,766 --> 00:16:51,806
Great work. I miss some of the breadth you covered with Dad,

241
00:16:51,926 --> 00:16:55,706
but I love the new show too. I think it's just the right I think it's just right

242
00:16:55,706 --> 00:16:58,666
content wise and I love the boost section and the jingles by the Way,

243
00:16:58,766 --> 00:17:01,326
this is a reverse zip code boost.

244
00:17:01,446 --> 00:17:05,266
Oh, ho ho or let me bust out the map here I'm not as good with this as Wes's

245
00:17:05,266 --> 00:17:12,946
Oh out right in the eyeball Oh down an eyeball, okay I'm thinking is this Hawaii is this right? Oh?

246
00:17:13,490 --> 00:17:16,270
You'll have to tell me, Deestaloo. I'm sorry if I'm getting your name wrong.

247
00:17:16,370 --> 00:17:21,030
I don't. Oh, Aloha, though. Ah, ha, ha. You did say Aloha. I think this is right.

248
00:17:21,650 --> 00:17:26,050
Well, that's cool. Okay, so I'm not super good with this, but yeah. Hello, Hawaii.

249
00:17:26,570 --> 00:17:30,790
Tell me where. Educate me more because that sounds awesome. And can I come visit?

250
00:17:31,630 --> 00:17:38,110
I'm sure everybody says that, right? Cdubs comes in with 33,333 sats.

251
00:17:39,630 --> 00:17:42,750
That's a nice one. Lucky 33 says, love the show. Keep it up.

252
00:17:42,750 --> 00:17:45,610
Thank you, Cdubs. Well, I will appreciate that.

253
00:17:46,250 --> 00:17:54,010
Apisary 17 comes in with 32,768 sats. Keep the change, you filthy animal.

254
00:17:54,350 --> 00:17:57,850
Says, I'm still loving the show. Don't lose heart, Chris. I ran out of sats

255
00:17:57,850 --> 00:17:58,990
last week, so I couldn't boost.

256
00:18:00,370 --> 00:18:02,530
Here's eight theoretical max size blocks worth.

257
00:18:04,070 --> 00:18:07,570
You know, we should have, oh man, I should have come up with some sort of like

258
00:18:07,570 --> 00:18:12,710
unique boost amount for the Havening. Everybody loves the unique SAT numbers, right?

259
00:18:12,770 --> 00:18:16,170
I should have done that. I do like the numerology.

260
00:18:16,330 --> 00:18:18,010
I can't lie. That is a great part of it.

261
00:18:18,390 --> 00:18:22,310
Red Sheep comes in with 25,000 SATs. Coming in hot with the boost.

262
00:18:22,590 --> 00:18:26,570
Just enjoyed the breakdown. I love the episode. And don't be downtrodden about your views or boost.

263
00:18:26,910 --> 00:18:29,910
Consistency is the key. My pod is one year and growing slow.

264
00:18:30,230 --> 00:18:34,470
That's true, Red Sheep. Consistency does help a lot. And I missed a couple of

265
00:18:34,470 --> 00:18:39,310
weeks in here because I launched this show because the Bitcoin dad came to an end.

266
00:18:39,310 --> 00:18:43,030
The ETFs were coming around the halvening was around I was like I just I felt

267
00:18:43,030 --> 00:18:44,670
like I want to keep the momentum going,

268
00:18:45,730 --> 00:18:52,170
but of course it's also silly season here I'm about to go into my third convention

269
00:18:52,170 --> 00:18:57,530
in less than a month or so and I'm losing track we have people coming to town

270
00:18:57,530 --> 00:18:59,930
I just got back from Texas which was great.

271
00:19:01,139 --> 00:19:03,439
You know, I've talked to a lot of listeners down there that are figuring out

272
00:19:03,439 --> 00:19:05,359
Bitcoin. That's pretty encouraging.

273
00:19:05,899 --> 00:19:08,779
So those are just a lot of moving pieces. But I think you're right.

274
00:19:08,859 --> 00:19:13,239
As the year goes on, consistency will be key as we grind it out to the next happening, right?

275
00:19:13,679 --> 00:19:17,279
Because we've got four more years now. It's going to be a little while,

276
00:19:17,339 --> 00:19:20,219
boys. Strap in. It's going to take us a minute.

277
00:19:20,839 --> 00:19:26,259
The Podfather comes in with 25,000 sats. But that's not possible. Nothing can do that.

278
00:19:26,579 --> 00:19:29,499
He writes, a restaurant that I liked but didn't frequent often here in town

279
00:19:29,499 --> 00:19:32,919
closed last week. I felt horrible I hadn't supported them more regularly.

280
00:19:33,459 --> 00:19:35,339
Same holds true for podcasts that I value.

281
00:19:36,039 --> 00:19:40,399
Boosting for your week off as well. Zoofication of podcasts? Okay, boomer, he says.

282
00:19:41,259 --> 00:19:44,879
Yeah, you get them. You get them. I agree. Make it so.

283
00:19:45,619 --> 00:19:47,899
Some people, you know, they just don't like the sound effects.

284
00:19:47,999 --> 00:19:51,339
I think they're anti-radio in general. Anything that reminds them of radio.

285
00:19:51,979 --> 00:19:55,659
I know what you mean, though, about supporting a restaurant in your local town, Podfather.

286
00:19:55,859 --> 00:20:00,459
There was a brewery that I loved. I did hold one meetup there,

287
00:20:00,539 --> 00:20:02,999
but I just never had the time to go.

288
00:20:03,419 --> 00:20:07,219
They had good snacks. They even had a spot for the kiddos to hang out and play

289
00:20:07,219 --> 00:20:12,099
games and, you know, do things that were not screen related while they also brewed beer.

290
00:20:12,259 --> 00:20:15,659
And it was just ideally the perfect, oh, and it was dog friendly.

291
00:20:15,799 --> 00:20:18,839
So I could bring the doggo, but they shut down.

292
00:20:19,059 --> 00:20:22,919
You know, they survived through most of the pandemic, but they shut down. And I felt really bad.

293
00:20:23,059 --> 00:20:27,779
I had that same sensation like, oh, I should have gone like once a week or something.

294
00:20:27,779 --> 00:20:29,099
And I should have made it part of my routine.

295
00:20:29,339 --> 00:20:31,319
And now I have to drive by their empty building.

296
00:20:31,739 --> 00:20:33,999
So, point well taken.

297
00:20:34,819 --> 00:20:36,699
Gotta support it while we can. Thank you, sir.

298
00:20:37,939 --> 00:20:42,259
Wise Hoddle comes in with 12,121 sats.

299
00:20:42,419 --> 00:20:46,599
Almost, almost a Spaceballs boost. Smoke if you got him.

300
00:20:46,859 --> 00:20:50,459
This is a great breakdown of the argument last week. I appreciate hearing Roger's

301
00:20:50,459 --> 00:20:51,679
take and then your counterpoints.

302
00:20:51,899 --> 00:20:55,459
I like the format more than the one-sided rants you basically hear everywhere else.

303
00:20:57,239 --> 00:21:01,419
Thank you. Yeah, I do try to, if I can, always try to get audio from the source.

304
00:21:01,579 --> 00:21:04,439
If you ever do see clips that you think would be great on the show,

305
00:21:04,519 --> 00:21:07,519
please do consider boosting them in or linking them to me in the matrix.

306
00:21:08,219 --> 00:21:12,139
I really do appreciate that. That is very, very handy because collecting the

307
00:21:12,139 --> 00:21:14,059
media, trying to get good stuff that you guys actually want to hear,

308
00:21:14,139 --> 00:21:14,799
it's all part of the game.

309
00:21:15,579 --> 00:21:21,059
Podhome comes in. Our sponsor and our platform for hosting comes in with 5,100 sets.

310
00:21:22,239 --> 00:21:25,699
This is a great episode. I'm working on my way up to storing several Bitcoin

311
00:21:25,699 --> 00:21:29,119
long-term for my kids. Any tips for the best ways to do that?

312
00:21:29,219 --> 00:21:31,579
I'm thinking 10 plus years of storage.

313
00:21:33,097 --> 00:21:38,057
Boy, there's a lot of ways to crack that one. I think you do it through graduated types of holdings.

314
00:21:38,077 --> 00:21:41,317
So the first bit, you don't really worry too much. You could probably even keep it on a hot wallet.

315
00:21:42,097 --> 00:21:48,057
I will say, I think GreenWallet from Blockstream is actually really great for

316
00:21:48,057 --> 00:21:51,357
this because you can have multiple sub-wallets in the app.

317
00:21:52,197 --> 00:21:57,477
And it supports the ability to restrict spending after two-factor authentication.

318
00:21:57,977 --> 00:22:03,137
So what I do is I'll stack sometimes in there for my kids, But I can't spend

319
00:22:03,137 --> 00:22:07,637
any of it unless they give me the two-factor code from a code generator on their

320
00:22:07,637 --> 00:22:09,617
device. So I can add Bitcoin.

321
00:22:10,097 --> 00:22:11,617
They can check balances, but

322
00:22:11,617 --> 00:22:15,497
they don't spend it, and I can't spend it without that two-factor code.

323
00:22:15,997 --> 00:22:18,937
So the Blockstream wallet is pretty nice for that because you can also get a

324
00:22:18,937 --> 00:22:19,817
hardware wallet with it.

325
00:22:19,917 --> 00:22:25,837
There is also that ability to potentially you might consider stacking in Liquid.

326
00:22:27,057 --> 00:22:31,417
The Aqua wallet can be really great for that. and then moving to on-chain once

327
00:22:31,417 --> 00:22:33,877
the amount is worth moving on-chain.

328
00:22:34,877 --> 00:22:39,177
And there's also things like, you know, graduating to a cold card after it's

329
00:22:39,177 --> 00:22:43,237
a considerable amount of Bitcoin and then giving that to them at a certain age.

330
00:22:43,577 --> 00:22:45,997
Those are things that are all in my mind and methods.

331
00:22:46,817 --> 00:22:49,037
But it's a great topic. How do you stack for family?

332
00:22:49,917 --> 00:22:52,477
What are your, what does anybody, if anybody else out there has some tips on

333
00:22:52,477 --> 00:22:55,037
how they would stack for family, please do consider sending that in.

334
00:22:55,077 --> 00:22:57,457
I think that'd be a great thing to crowdsource for the show.

335
00:22:57,457 --> 00:22:59,117
So thank you for the boost, Pothome.

336
00:23:00,757 --> 00:23:04,557
Ace Ackerman comes in with 2,468 sats.

337
00:23:05,357 --> 00:23:09,217
Value for Value Episode 5 and Value for Value Episode 6. Two boosts for both

338
00:23:09,217 --> 00:23:11,457
shows. Thank you very much. Appreciate that.

339
00:23:11,877 --> 00:23:15,937
Gene Bean comes in with Row of Ducks, 2,222 sats.

340
00:23:17,217 --> 00:23:19,577
Boosting just because I want this show to continue. Thank you,

341
00:23:19,577 --> 00:23:22,717
Gene Bean. I miss you. It was good seeing you back at scale.

342
00:23:23,097 --> 00:23:24,917
Hope you're doing well, and thank you for the boost.

343
00:23:25,517 --> 00:23:30,497
Hybrid Sarcasm comes in with 10,000 sats. It's over 9,000!

344
00:23:31,317 --> 00:23:39,137
He says, keep the soundboard. Well, thank you very much. Dexord comes in with 9,134 sats.

345
00:23:39,317 --> 00:23:43,137
I had to come back and re-listen because I remembered loving this episode and

346
00:23:43,137 --> 00:23:44,197
hearing you say that it sucked.

347
00:23:44,637 --> 00:23:46,857
So it made me do a double take. I get...

348
00:23:48,617 --> 00:23:51,377
That's the one I didn't like. I get lost listening. I love hearing all this

349
00:23:51,377 --> 00:23:53,037
color and context around Bitcoin and finance.

350
00:23:53,237 --> 00:23:55,017
I don't get anywhere else. So please don't stop. Well, good.

351
00:23:55,057 --> 00:23:59,697
If you like the bad episodes, Dex, then you should really like the good ones, I hope.

352
00:24:00,257 --> 00:24:03,317
It says all episodes have been great so far. You, sir, are too kind.

353
00:24:03,437 --> 00:24:06,657
I am also my worst critic. That is definitely, that's the way you got to be,

354
00:24:06,717 --> 00:24:08,417
really, for this kind of stuff.

355
00:24:09,557 --> 00:24:13,157
You kind of want to be your worst critic because otherwise somebody else will.

356
00:24:14,037 --> 00:24:18,637
And you might as well get to it before they do, I say. Oppie 1984 comes in with

357
00:24:18,637 --> 00:24:21,517
4,000 stats. B-O-O-S-T.

358
00:24:22,517 --> 00:24:26,117
My first boost for episode 5 failed. and I didn't catch it. I was low on sets,

359
00:24:26,517 --> 00:24:29,757
but I'll catch up later. The TLDR for my message was, um.

360
00:24:31,432 --> 00:24:33,872
Oh, posting the show at the end of the week works best for me,

361
00:24:33,892 --> 00:24:35,952
but do whatever works best for the show. Yeah, I am still pulling.

362
00:24:36,152 --> 00:24:39,712
I have experimented. I got to say, the earlier release in the weeks do seem

363
00:24:39,712 --> 00:24:42,252
to do slightly better, but it's also going to be topic-wise.

364
00:24:42,332 --> 00:24:44,952
I'm just going to keep at it. This one, I'm timing with the halvening,

365
00:24:44,992 --> 00:24:49,492
so it's nice to just say, okay, well, once we hit block height 840,000,

366
00:24:49,532 --> 00:24:50,752
that's when I'm releasing the episode.

367
00:24:51,012 --> 00:24:53,112
You know what? I like that timescale better.

368
00:24:53,632 --> 00:24:56,492
Lazy Locks came in with 7,000 sats to say, keep on going.

369
00:24:57,012 --> 00:25:00,952
Appreciate that. 5,000 sats from 21 is enough just to say strong emoji.

370
00:25:00,952 --> 00:25:02,872
Thank you, sir. Really appreciate that boost.

371
00:25:03,232 --> 00:25:09,752
And my frio comes in with 2,845 sats to say cheers and keep the soundboard.

372
00:25:09,892 --> 00:25:12,892
Enjoy your dang show. Make it so. Well, thank you.

373
00:25:13,892 --> 00:25:19,772
I appreciate that. Sir Alex Gates, the podcasting to-do-do consultant comes

374
00:25:19,772 --> 00:25:21,912
in with 4,096 sats. Hey, citizen.

375
00:25:22,172 --> 00:25:26,952
How many want to spend have already moved to Monero? Or many who want to spend

376
00:25:26,952 --> 00:25:28,012
have already moved to Monero.

377
00:25:28,292 --> 00:25:31,972
The adaptive block size is working and I believe the correct solution for the

378
00:25:31,972 --> 00:25:35,712
foreseeable future. See coin cards and shop and bit usage statistics, for example.

379
00:25:36,292 --> 00:25:39,372
Unfortunately, the low transaction bandwidth on layer one Bitcoin will always

380
00:25:39,372 --> 00:25:40,572
stunt future possibilities.

381
00:25:40,872 --> 00:25:44,972
I'm a big proponent of Arctic Minds scaling arguments from Monero's core team.

382
00:25:45,592 --> 00:25:50,152
I just can't imagine that Monero will ever be a large store of value.

383
00:25:51,192 --> 00:25:59,052
Because of the inability to audit, because I think the world wants a counter

384
00:25:59,052 --> 00:26:04,752
option to the banking system, which is opaque and full of rot and corruption.

385
00:26:05,772 --> 00:26:10,552
They want something transparent, audible, something where the rules are known by everybody.

386
00:26:10,832 --> 00:26:16,012
And Monero is really useful in privacy sense, but it's not useful in an auditability

387
00:26:16,012 --> 00:26:17,392
and store of value sense.

388
00:26:17,992 --> 00:26:24,352
And I continue to make the argument, which was the counter-argument to Roger and the big blockers,

389
00:26:24,472 --> 00:26:33,692
that you do not get to a currency and a medium of exchange before you get to a store of value.

390
00:26:33,692 --> 00:26:38,112
You have to get to a store of value first because this has to be worth something,

391
00:26:38,252 --> 00:26:42,152
and it has to be worth a lot likely, and we all kind of have to agree on what

392
00:26:42,152 --> 00:26:50,472
it's worth before we can start trading it for in real life goods and time and services.

393
00:26:52,072 --> 00:26:56,432
You don't get to the point without some sort of agreement, and we see it.

394
00:26:56,452 --> 00:26:58,492
We're seeing that price discovery. We've been witnessing it.

395
00:27:00,051 --> 00:27:04,051
But we're not done yet. And I don't think we have to rush that part of it.

396
00:27:04,211 --> 00:27:06,951
And I maintain we may not get to see it in our lifetime.

397
00:27:07,911 --> 00:27:14,151
Monero is useful, but its price will always fluctuate. It'll always be hard

398
00:27:14,151 --> 00:27:16,051
to totally nail down what it's worth.

399
00:27:16,591 --> 00:27:19,251
Because the scarcity cannot be fully accounted for.

400
00:27:20,571 --> 00:27:25,171
And I think the idea that we can't use Layer 2s or side chains or Fetamins or whatever.

401
00:27:27,511 --> 00:27:32,971
Is very challengeable. I think I could argue that we can and that layer twos

402
00:27:32,971 --> 00:27:37,551
and side chains and things like Fetament are actually perhaps going to be exactly

403
00:27:37,551 --> 00:27:39,371
the direction things go and should always have been.

404
00:27:39,691 --> 00:27:43,791
Much like HTTP is built on top of TCP IP.

405
00:27:44,011 --> 00:27:48,651
You don't get HTTP without TCP IP, but we're not all just sitting here,

406
00:27:48,751 --> 00:27:51,311
you know, sending things via UDP directly to each other.

407
00:27:51,771 --> 00:27:55,891
That's just not, yeah, the applications that are built on top of the internet,

408
00:27:56,051 --> 00:27:58,991
maybe speaking UDP or TCP, right?

409
00:27:59,191 --> 00:28:02,771
But I'm not. I'm not opening up my terminal and doing it directly.

410
00:28:02,871 --> 00:28:06,151
I'm using an application that's talking to that stack.

411
00:28:06,811 --> 00:28:09,751
And there's even a middleman called the operating system in between there.

412
00:28:10,351 --> 00:28:13,811
And then you have TCP, the base layer. I know it's a rough analogy,

413
00:28:13,971 --> 00:28:20,451
and I wouldn't try to build a big case on that analogy, but I do think it's worth considering.

414
00:28:20,451 --> 00:28:25,931
And it's a lens worth looking at this, Alex, is you do not get to a medium of

415
00:28:25,931 --> 00:28:28,071
exchange without it being a store of value.

416
00:28:28,351 --> 00:28:31,831
And we're very deeply in the store of value learning process.

417
00:28:32,071 --> 00:28:37,591
And I could see it lasting our entire lifetimes as we just try to process something

418
00:28:37,591 --> 00:28:38,551
that's new and that's different.

419
00:28:39,211 --> 00:28:42,751
But I'd love to know if you think differently and how do we get to a unit of

420
00:28:42,751 --> 00:28:46,271
exchange if we don't all universally agree that it's a store of value first.

421
00:28:47,191 --> 00:28:50,751
I think that would be an interesting conversation. I'd love to hear if you have thoughts on that.

422
00:28:52,876 --> 00:28:57,016
Tomato comes in with 5,555 sats. Stay a while and listen.

423
00:28:57,816 --> 00:29:01,436
He says, LUP subscriber here. I finally read up enough on Lightning that I'm

424
00:29:01,436 --> 00:29:04,716
convinced of Bitcoin as something that might work out for sending value.

425
00:29:04,856 --> 00:29:08,876
I'm very happy to have the Bitcoin podcast from a trusted name in the free software group.

426
00:29:09,396 --> 00:29:13,576
I'd like to start moving some of my money into Bitcoin, but for a newcomer,

427
00:29:13,576 --> 00:29:14,796
the software is a bit intimidating.

428
00:29:15,236 --> 00:29:17,696
You've been dropping recommendations here and there for years,

429
00:29:17,796 --> 00:29:21,836
but I'd love to have the Chris Fisher recommendation for Bitcoin-related software in 2024.

430
00:29:22,876 --> 00:29:28,236
I want desktop self-custodial wallet that you trust and any advice for someone

431
00:29:28,236 --> 00:29:31,476
getting into it that my newbie is trying to read up.

432
00:29:32,356 --> 00:29:35,716
Should I just set up a node myself for the first 1,000 euros?

433
00:29:36,116 --> 00:29:39,176
What's a completely open source stack that you trust with convenience as an

434
00:29:39,176 --> 00:29:41,296
important consideration distinctly after the first two?

435
00:29:41,356 --> 00:29:44,456
Cheers, fans of Linux Action Show. Man, that's a big question.

436
00:29:44,996 --> 00:29:48,016
Boy, I could do a whole episode on that. Let me see if I can get through this

437
00:29:48,016 --> 00:29:51,836
pretty quick. Two things you need to come to a decision about really kind of off the top.

438
00:29:52,876 --> 00:29:56,436
Are you okay with KYC, which is know your customer, where they're going to identify

439
00:29:56,436 --> 00:29:59,576
you and your purchases will be linked to your Bitcoin.

440
00:30:00,116 --> 00:30:02,596
That doesn't necessarily mean anybody will do anything with it,

441
00:30:02,636 --> 00:30:05,676
but in theory, the IRS or somebody could subpoena where you bought your Bitcoin

442
00:30:05,676 --> 00:30:08,316
from or whatever, you know, you know, national security letter,

443
00:30:08,376 --> 00:30:12,216
then whatever it might be and say, uh, how many Bitcoin did this Chris guy buy?

444
00:30:12,336 --> 00:30:15,796
You know, or in your case, how many Bitcoin did tomato buy?

445
00:30:16,696 --> 00:30:20,536
Maybe you go buy tomato. And, uh, then they'd say, well, you know,

446
00:30:20,596 --> 00:30:22,476
um, We see this large dollar amount.

447
00:30:22,656 --> 00:30:25,656
It seems like maybe you made a sale and didn't report on your taxes.

448
00:30:26,256 --> 00:30:28,676
What's going on here? You know, they can make a connection like that.

449
00:30:29,616 --> 00:30:33,896
KYC, though, does have the benefit of being simple. You can tie it to your bank account.

450
00:30:34,076 --> 00:30:36,696
It's probably the most straightforward way if you just want to do what's called

451
00:30:36,696 --> 00:30:40,636
a DCA, daily cash average, where you just make a small reoccurring purchase,

452
00:30:40,756 --> 00:30:44,136
either like once a day or once a week, and you kind of average out the volatility.

453
00:30:45,756 --> 00:30:49,096
That generally only happens when you KYC. There are services,

454
00:30:49,196 --> 00:30:52,416
if you don't want to have your identity tied to it, like RoboSats that are on

455
00:30:52,416 --> 00:30:55,736
tour that are really straightforward to use, but you'll have to jump through

456
00:30:55,736 --> 00:30:56,756
at least some more hoops.

457
00:30:57,076 --> 00:30:59,216
Remember, you are buying outside a system.

458
00:30:59,756 --> 00:31:05,396
You are working inside a closed system, and you are trying to buy outside that into an open system.

459
00:31:05,816 --> 00:31:09,416
To get there, you have to go through the closed system's gates.

460
00:31:10,376 --> 00:31:13,256
They determine what information and what you give them in order to go through

461
00:31:13,256 --> 00:31:15,936
those gates, much like going through a border in a country.

462
00:31:17,536 --> 00:31:20,776
RoboSats kind of bypasses all of that, but you'll have to buy smaller amounts

463
00:31:20,776 --> 00:31:23,316
and there'll be a premium for the privacy and you'll have to get a Tor browser

464
00:31:23,316 --> 00:31:26,496
and probably want to go read the RoboSats learning website.

465
00:31:27,836 --> 00:31:30,276
So you'll have to make a decision how you want to acquire your Bitcoin.

466
00:31:31,056 --> 00:31:34,936
If you want to use the KYC route, I like River a lot. Not a sponsor.

467
00:31:35,156 --> 00:31:37,956
I don't get paid to say that. I just think River is a good company and they

468
00:31:37,956 --> 00:31:41,336
have lightning withdrawals, which can help your privacy and reduce your fees.

469
00:31:43,136 --> 00:31:48,216
My personal recommendation would be to stack more than a million sats,

470
00:31:48,296 --> 00:31:52,796
it's your kind of determination what's a high value, but more than a million sats in river,

471
00:31:52,916 --> 00:31:58,136
transfer it over Lightning into Liquid using bolts.exchange,

472
00:31:58,296 --> 00:32:00,516
consolidate in Liquid for a little bit longer,

473
00:32:01,216 --> 00:32:05,076
then move it to something like the Sparrow wallet that's using a cold card or

474
00:32:05,076 --> 00:32:06,476
some other hardware wallet that you like.

475
00:32:06,836 --> 00:32:10,256
You'll have to create that wallet first with your cold card before you start moving into it.

476
00:32:10,676 --> 00:32:14,056
These are all the self-custodial ways you can do it. There's a lot of in-between.

477
00:32:14,876 --> 00:32:18,896
I want to be clear that you shouldn't make perfect the enemy of the good,

478
00:32:19,016 --> 00:32:20,596
especially when you're just trying to get started.

479
00:32:20,756 --> 00:32:23,476
When you're just dealing with a couple hundred dollars or a couple thousand

480
00:32:23,476 --> 00:32:27,296
dollars worth, you don't need to invent your own Fort Knox before you get started.

481
00:32:27,456 --> 00:32:29,716
You don't necessarily need to go that far.

482
00:32:29,956 --> 00:32:33,316
If you enjoy it like I do and you want to run a node like you asked,

483
00:32:33,496 --> 00:32:38,596
something like Start9 or Umbral is a pretty straightforward approach.

484
00:32:38,776 --> 00:32:42,096
Umbral is going through some major changes right now. you might wait them out

485
00:32:42,096 --> 00:32:44,676
and just see where they're at in six months because they're doing major updates.

486
00:32:44,756 --> 00:32:47,056
They look like it's good stuff, good changes for the platform.

487
00:32:47,676 --> 00:32:52,616
Start9, a bit more solid, a little bit slower changes, a little bit more,

488
00:32:52,636 --> 00:32:54,876
I'd say, limited scope in what they're trying to accomplish,

489
00:32:55,056 --> 00:32:57,616
but they're nailing doing a Bitcoin node. That's the Start9 OS.

490
00:32:58,016 --> 00:33:01,616
If you are really technical, and you know what we're doing here at JB,

491
00:33:01,916 --> 00:33:03,676
Nick's Bitcoin cannot be beat.

492
00:33:03,936 --> 00:33:06,716
It is a appliance-level Bitcoin node.

493
00:33:06,996 --> 00:33:10,536
It will only change When you iterate, those changes will be built and tested

494
00:33:10,536 --> 00:33:13,596
before they're deployed, and it has snapshot rollbacks if something goes wrong.

495
00:33:14,316 --> 00:33:18,256
I mean, it is the best way to go if your NIC's comfortable.

496
00:33:19,116 --> 00:33:21,536
I would probably recommend start 9 just to get started, though.

497
00:33:21,976 --> 00:33:23,656
That's as fast as I can try to go through it.

498
00:33:24,176 --> 00:33:28,476
That's a big question to ask, and if people are more interested in that,

499
00:33:28,556 --> 00:33:30,756
if people are at that spot and they want more information, I would absolutely

500
00:33:30,756 --> 00:33:35,136
consider in the future doing like a special episode on it, perhaps when I'm traveling,

501
00:33:35,316 --> 00:33:39,176
and we could go through there. Now, Tomato, so that was from Tomato.

502
00:33:40,416 --> 00:33:44,876
Not even kidding. Now, Tomato with an H comes in with a Spaceballs boost.

503
00:33:45,016 --> 00:33:49,056
So the combination is one, two, three, four, five.

504
00:33:50,216 --> 00:33:53,676
That's the stupidest combination I ever heard in my life. They added an H and

505
00:33:53,676 --> 00:33:55,656
they said, I just wanted to send a little more value for the show.

506
00:33:55,756 --> 00:33:58,276
Well, thank you very much, Tomato. I hope you found my answer useful.

507
00:33:58,356 --> 00:33:59,956
I know I blasted through that really quick.

508
00:34:00,236 --> 00:34:03,136
If you have clarifying questions, please feel free to boost them in and I will

509
00:34:03,136 --> 00:34:05,796
try to dedicate time to answering them.

510
00:34:06,758 --> 00:34:10,018
Just figure out if you want KYC or not. That's know your customer.

511
00:34:10,458 --> 00:34:13,298
If you want to do it private or not, and you're willing to pay a premium for

512
00:34:13,298 --> 00:34:14,358
that, that'd be RoboSats.

513
00:34:14,938 --> 00:34:18,958
If you're comfortable with the identification, like this is more of an investment,

514
00:34:19,058 --> 00:34:22,438
not like a rebel money for you, then I'd probably recommend River.

515
00:34:22,718 --> 00:34:25,818
There's other really great companies out there, but I think River's been doing

516
00:34:25,818 --> 00:34:28,938
it really well for a while. And then you can build it up from there.

517
00:34:29,498 --> 00:34:32,818
You don't have to have it all solved at once. And you have time to read.

518
00:34:32,938 --> 00:34:35,538
And Sparrow, by the way, the Sparrow wallet has some great documentation.

519
00:34:36,198 --> 00:34:41,058
Definitely go check that out. Okay, well, we got 3,222 sats from Faraday Fedora.

520
00:34:41,158 --> 00:34:42,818
This old duck still got it.

521
00:34:42,938 --> 00:34:46,538
So sorry, man, I've been stacking, not zapping lately, but the content has been great.

522
00:34:47,518 --> 00:34:53,618
Thank you very much. Rounding it out now, Bob B takes us out with 5,000 sats. Boost!

523
00:34:54,158 --> 00:34:58,098
Chris, Oak and a self-hosted lightning node was an interesting experiment,

524
00:34:58,318 --> 00:35:00,418
but I don't think I want to maintain my own node.

525
00:35:00,678 --> 00:35:05,498
It's crashed twice now, and I had to recover it, And I think there's got to be a better way.

526
00:35:05,718 --> 00:35:09,498
I really like sending stats automatically, though, because I rarely have anything

527
00:35:09,498 --> 00:35:11,318
to say. But I wanted to send the love.

528
00:35:11,478 --> 00:35:15,318
Got any recommendations for something like Oak that would work with custodial

529
00:35:15,318 --> 00:35:16,358
Lightning wallets? Thanks, Bob.

530
00:35:16,538 --> 00:35:20,278
So Bob's been a longtime booster who set up automated boosts using Oak,

531
00:35:20,398 --> 00:35:24,318
where it just sort of uses a schedule like Cron to send a boost a certain amount

532
00:35:24,318 --> 00:35:26,238
of time. But as you heard, he had some problems there.

533
00:35:26,338 --> 00:35:31,258
There really should be a better automated way, Bob. Bob, some platforms like

534
00:35:31,258 --> 00:35:33,158
TrueFans are building that in.

535
00:35:33,318 --> 00:35:36,658
And, you know, you could probably really accomplish it with streaming sats if

536
00:35:36,658 --> 00:35:39,358
you just upped it. But I do love hearing from you from time to time.

537
00:35:39,438 --> 00:35:42,858
It makes me really happy to know you're still out there, Bob.

538
00:35:43,058 --> 00:35:46,998
I got to say, I wasn't sure if you were still listening. And I think about you boosters.

539
00:35:47,458 --> 00:35:51,538
You make an impression on us. So I really appreciate that you just took a moment

540
00:35:51,538 --> 00:35:52,418
to let me know what you're up to.

541
00:35:52,518 --> 00:35:56,138
And if anybody has a recommendation for automated boosting over the lighting network.

542
00:35:57,450 --> 00:36:00,630
Let me know. I definitely look into that.

543
00:36:00,750 --> 00:36:04,610
We had a bunch of other great boosts under the 2,000 on-air cutoff,

544
00:36:04,690 --> 00:36:09,030
but I cut off at 2,000 sats just to make sure we don't go on forever in this segment.

545
00:36:09,050 --> 00:36:12,830
But we had 25 boosters, 34 total boosts sent in.

546
00:36:13,970 --> 00:36:18,830
That's not bad at all. And we stacked 294,948 sats.

547
00:36:19,850 --> 00:36:25,070
Thank you, everybody. That is much better this week.

548
00:36:25,090 --> 00:36:29,850
I really appreciate it. But as the hustle continues, I appreciate those boosts.

549
00:36:29,850 --> 00:36:34,030
If you'd like to send a boost in to support this individual production, send a little value.

550
00:36:34,050 --> 00:36:37,070
If you got good information, you enjoyed the listen, you want to see the show

551
00:36:37,070 --> 00:36:41,130
continue on, Value for Value is a great way to support an episode either with

552
00:36:41,130 --> 00:36:43,330
your treasure, your time, or your talent.

553
00:36:43,570 --> 00:36:47,350
And a lot of us these days, we're very busy, but we can send a few sats in.

554
00:36:47,390 --> 00:36:50,530
Go get a new podcast app at podcastapps.com.

555
00:36:50,890 --> 00:36:54,330
Bunch of great apps over there. Fountain is cranking out changes like crazy.

556
00:36:54,330 --> 00:36:57,930
They just got a brand new release that improves the UI a little bit and performance.

557
00:36:58,810 --> 00:37:05,550
Podverse.fm is a GPL cross-platform app that is also available in the web.

558
00:37:05,710 --> 00:37:09,070
And if you like to finish podcasts at your desk on your big speakers like I

559
00:37:09,070 --> 00:37:10,810
do, that's a huge feature.

560
00:37:10,990 --> 00:37:15,050
And Castomatic is one of the best podcast players on iOS, hands down.

561
00:37:15,130 --> 00:37:18,890
So those are some great podcasting 2.0 apps that also support boosts,

562
00:37:18,890 --> 00:37:24,530
transcripts, and chapters, which this show does. Those are all podcasting 2.0 features.

563
00:37:24,670 --> 00:37:29,810
It's an open standard that makes podcasting better and compete with proprietary

564
00:37:29,810 --> 00:37:31,150
platforms because that's what.

565
00:37:31,150 --> 00:37:34,750
We're trying to do here is offer something better that is decentralized.

566
00:37:35,070 --> 00:37:38,150
It doesn't have to, you don't have to go on YouTube. You don't have to use Discord.

567
00:37:38,350 --> 00:37:39,290
You don't have to use Spotify.

568
00:37:39,690 --> 00:37:44,430
We're doing it in the RSS feed. It is the source of truth and you can support

569
00:37:44,430 --> 00:37:49,290
that and the creators in the podcasting 2.0 ecosystem by sending in a boost,

570
00:37:49,410 --> 00:37:53,010
by listening and by sharing the show. Thank you, everybody that does that.

571
00:37:53,360 --> 00:38:05,040
Music.

572
00:38:03,970 --> 00:38:05,790
Well, how about some project updates?

573
00:38:07,839 --> 00:38:13,379
This first one, not so much a big project update, but good for projects in the Bitcoin ecosystem.

574
00:38:14,039 --> 00:38:19,679
Fake Toshi Craig Wright is discontinuing his case against 12 Bitcoin developers

575
00:38:19,679 --> 00:38:23,599
and other individuals that he was suing in the UK high court.

576
00:38:23,779 --> 00:38:28,859
The end of this lawsuit signifies the conclusion of Wright's nearly 10-year-long

577
00:38:28,859 --> 00:38:33,479
strategy of trying to intimidate and harass good people doing good work in the

578
00:38:33,479 --> 00:38:34,479
Bitcoin ecosystem. system.

579
00:38:34,659 --> 00:38:39,639
And this is a major victory for Bitcoin developers who are being chased and haunted by this man.

580
00:38:40,179 --> 00:38:45,119
The tulip trading case, as it was known, has been an existential complication

581
00:38:45,119 --> 00:38:47,779
for Bitcoin for quite some time.

582
00:38:47,959 --> 00:38:50,179
That's how I'm putting it. I don't want to give the man too much credit,

583
00:38:50,859 --> 00:38:54,419
but it's been like, you know, you got a sore butt and every time you sit down, you hurt yourself.

584
00:38:55,039 --> 00:38:58,579
Wright's decision to drop the lawsuit came shortly after a distinct victory

585
00:38:58,579 --> 00:39:02,279
for the Bitcoin developers associated with this UK lawsuit known as the Identity Trial.

586
00:39:02,739 --> 00:39:07,919
Also, Hodlnaut, who was being sued, found out that Wright is dropping the case

587
00:39:07,919 --> 00:39:10,699
against him as well, which is great.

588
00:39:10,879 --> 00:39:13,859
That was a ridiculous case.

589
00:39:14,259 --> 00:39:19,119
And Wright has had his assets frozen, which are worth around $7.6 million somehow.

590
00:39:19,959 --> 00:39:22,079
I don't know how, but somehow.

591
00:39:24,039 --> 00:39:26,379
Hopefully that's the last I ever have to talk about that man.

592
00:39:26,859 --> 00:39:31,099
I've been talking about him for way, way too long, and I try to keep it as minimal as possible.

593
00:39:31,599 --> 00:39:36,159
Heads up for those of you that run on the Lightning LND demon and are looking

594
00:39:36,159 --> 00:39:38,099
at upgrading to the new Bitcoin Core 27.

595
00:39:39,039 --> 00:39:46,039
This is developing. It appears that an update to LND will be released soon that addresses an issue.

596
00:39:47,199 --> 00:39:52,359
There is essentially an incompatibility between Bitcoin D version 27 and LND 17.4.

597
00:39:52,459 --> 00:39:57,299
So LND 0.17.5 will be released soon, probably maybe by the time you're hearing

598
00:39:57,299 --> 00:39:58,999
this, to address this issue.

599
00:39:59,059 --> 00:40:00,019
But But until then, you should hold

600
00:40:00,019 --> 00:40:05,519
off on upgrading Bitcoin D27 because transaction broadcasts will fail.

601
00:40:06,639 --> 00:40:08,899
And your Lightning Network is not going to like that. Your Bitcoin is not going

602
00:40:08,899 --> 00:40:10,119
to like that. Nothing is going to like that.

603
00:40:10,859 --> 00:40:16,499
It's a little issue with the RPC code in Bitcoin D's recipient in BTC JSON library.

604
00:40:18,019 --> 00:40:21,599
And the issue will actually be resolved by an LND update. So keep an eye out

605
00:40:21,599 --> 00:40:25,839
for LND 0.17.5 if you run a Lightning server.

606
00:40:26,379 --> 00:40:29,879
Then you can upgrade your Bitcoin daemon. And I wanted to let you know about

607
00:40:29,879 --> 00:40:32,419
that because that seems kind of awful.

608
00:40:32,400 --> 00:40:41,040
Music.

609
00:40:37,939 --> 00:40:43,519
Moving right along, though, I have one hell of a final clip for you.

610
00:40:43,799 --> 00:40:47,299
This is a U.S. senator that feels like it should be headline news.

611
00:40:47,399 --> 00:40:50,739
It should be playing on every financial newscast out there.

612
00:40:51,019 --> 00:40:57,239
But of course, I've seen no coverage of it. It was just during a Q&A that was live streamed.

613
00:40:57,946 --> 00:41:02,146
I mean, I've seen some Bitcoiners talk about it, but nobody in the mainstream,

614
00:41:02,446 --> 00:41:07,886
nobody in the financial press has covered that U.S. Senator Cynthia Loomis says

615
00:41:07,886 --> 00:41:12,606
that high-ranking government officials feel directly threatened by Bitcoin.

616
00:41:12,906 --> 00:41:14,886
Here's the audio. I'll have it linked in the show notes, too.

617
00:41:15,106 --> 00:41:23,346
So the state of play on Capitol Hill is, I think, best explained by what I see

618
00:41:23,346 --> 00:41:25,606
as the overarching motivations. innovations.

619
00:41:25,966 --> 00:41:30,506
And in this administration, there

620
00:41:30,506 --> 00:41:39,786
are a number of high-ranking policy positions that are held by people who are

621
00:41:39,786 --> 00:41:45,206
threatened by Bitcoin because they know they can't control it.

622
00:41:45,326 --> 00:41:47,286
They know it's decentralized.

623
00:41:48,026 --> 00:41:54,786
They know its potential. And these are people that are so wedded to the government

624
00:41:54,786 --> 00:42:01,206
being in control of the money, how it's spent,

625
00:42:01,546 --> 00:42:09,846
how it's used, that they find it threatening that something exists that they can't control.

626
00:42:10,166 --> 00:42:17,866
And so with that policy overarching motivation, we're seeing things like a proposed

627
00:42:17,866 --> 00:42:21,246
30% tax on Bitcoin mining.

628
00:42:21,386 --> 00:42:32,646
We're seeing things like that truly odd regulatory overreach by the EIA,

629
00:42:33,046 --> 00:42:37,046
Energy Information Administration over at Energy,

630
00:42:37,266 --> 00:42:48,586
to send out questionnaires about mining consumption of energy that was just egregious.

631
00:42:49,206 --> 00:42:59,226
And so these are the policy headwinds that the Bitcoin world is facing right now.

632
00:42:59,966 --> 00:43:09,126
And it's really, I think, entirely based on this administration's fear of things they can't control.

633
00:43:09,486 --> 00:43:14,166
When I think about this, about her statements there, I wonder what the next

634
00:43:14,166 --> 00:43:15,746
four years hold for Bitcoin.

635
00:43:16,086 --> 00:43:19,286
It's an interesting way to kind of think about time. You know,

636
00:43:19,286 --> 00:43:21,186
in 2028 is the next halving.

637
00:43:22,146 --> 00:43:25,586
And then we go down to 1.56 Bitcoin issued.

638
00:43:26,706 --> 00:43:30,186
Imagine when we get down to 1.56 Bitcoin.

639
00:43:31,366 --> 00:43:36,126
What is one Bitcoin going to be worth at that point? Or what about the 2032 halving?

640
00:43:36,886 --> 00:43:44,346
In 2032, the block reward goes to 0.78 Bitcoin. Bitcoin, not even a full Bitcoin in 2028.

641
00:43:45,306 --> 00:43:50,826
The price of one Bitcoin is going to go up substantially if the entire reward

642
00:43:50,826 --> 00:43:52,166
is less than one Bitcoin.

643
00:43:54,156 --> 00:44:00,976
Or even in 2028 when it's 1.5 bitcoins. How will policy change and adapt in that four-year window?

644
00:44:01,056 --> 00:44:05,456
What a pressure cooker four years that's going to be for policy, for awareness.

645
00:44:06,896 --> 00:44:12,176
I just can't even imagine. I mean, personally, in my life, my oldest will be more than an adult.

646
00:44:13,356 --> 00:44:18,816
He's going to be, you know, all grown up. And I'll have other ones close on the way.

647
00:44:18,896 --> 00:44:21,756
The next four years is going to be life-changing for all of us.

648
00:44:22,236 --> 00:44:24,776
And it's going to be completely redefining for Bitcoin.

649
00:44:25,996 --> 00:44:30,916
And one of the things I'm excited about is podcasting 2.0 is helping normalize

650
00:44:30,916 --> 00:44:38,816
sats as a unit of account, which is a critical part of us all accepting it as a medium of exchange.

651
00:44:39,256 --> 00:44:42,576
When you boost in, we're going by the sat amounts, you know,

652
00:44:42,576 --> 00:44:47,016
a row of ducks, space balls boost. These things are numbers of sats, not their USD value.

653
00:44:47,276 --> 00:44:50,316
We don't even internally do the calculation into USD.

654
00:44:51,116 --> 00:44:55,796
Internally, all of our accounting is in Sats. And we're doing that with independent media.

655
00:44:56,656 --> 00:44:59,516
I wonder over the next four years how many other places will be doing that.

656
00:44:59,876 --> 00:45:01,636
Audiobooks and music, but more.

657
00:45:02,036 --> 00:45:04,956
Not just content, perhaps services, companies.

658
00:45:06,296 --> 00:45:10,356
Maybe, maybe not. We'll see. But I'm going to leave you with a little value

659
00:45:10,356 --> 00:45:13,976
for value music. If you boost in during this track, your Sats go to support the artist.

660
00:45:14,236 --> 00:45:18,516
And the artist in this case is June and the Jets. And the track is Leave It

661
00:45:18,516 --> 00:45:21,556
Alone. loaned. I hope you had a great happening and I'll see you next week.

662
00:45:23,120 --> 00:49:01,680
Music.
