1
00:00:00,837 --> 00:00:04,417
Welcome in to This Week in Bitcoin, episode 16. My name is Chris.

2
00:00:04,837 --> 00:00:09,877
If you're listening to this episode around release time, I think we're watching

3
00:00:09,877 --> 00:00:14,337
in real time Bitcoin price in a bunch of historical stuff that we're about to talk about.

4
00:00:14,497 --> 00:00:17,077
And if you're listening to this on a more long-term horizon,

5
00:00:17,317 --> 00:00:23,237
a year from now or more, I think you might look back at this as a mile marker week for 2004.

6
00:00:23,517 --> 00:00:26,397
I did that last week, too.

7
00:00:26,877 --> 00:00:29,437
It's going to fundamentally change things on the ground for Bitcoin.

8
00:00:30,017 --> 00:00:34,597
Also, we got some data this week that shows that maybe those ETF purchasers

9
00:00:34,597 --> 00:00:36,837
don't have such paper hands after all.

10
00:00:36,877 --> 00:00:41,157
They've seen some of the first major price shakeouts since ETFs launched and

11
00:00:41,157 --> 00:00:44,277
on scale, they're holding. So welcome to the class of 2024.

12
00:00:45,717 --> 00:00:48,797
It has been a wild weekend change.

13
00:00:49,157 --> 00:00:53,857
All at the same time, the U.S. government is selling seized Bitcoin from multiple

14
00:00:53,857 --> 00:00:58,797
different legal cases, one of them being Silk Road. So is the German government.

15
00:00:59,077 --> 00:01:01,777
Tons of Bitcoin from one of their movie 2K cases.

16
00:01:02,197 --> 00:01:07,297
And Mt. Gox announced it's distributing its Bitcoin after a decade.

17
00:01:07,577 --> 00:01:10,477
Now, the governments are going right to spot market.

18
00:01:10,777 --> 00:01:15,957
Mt. Gox ought to be returning the funds to users. We'll be talking about that in a little bit.

19
00:01:16,037 --> 00:01:21,077
But that's just the small stuff. The bigger thing happening that's finally really

20
00:01:21,077 --> 00:01:25,137
taking place is the post-halving minor capitulation.

21
00:01:25,417 --> 00:01:27,297
It's happening later than expected.

22
00:01:27,657 --> 00:01:31,697
Typically, if you look at past cycles, it happens roughly 30 days after the halving.

23
00:01:32,375 --> 00:01:38,455
But this cycle, we're just about 70 days post halving, and it does seem to be happening now.

24
00:01:38,615 --> 00:01:41,875
And I'll give you some of the data we have around that. But I wanted to back

25
00:01:41,875 --> 00:01:48,855
up a second, not get into this too fast, and maybe explain what this miner capitulation event is about.

26
00:01:49,435 --> 00:01:53,815
And Joe Burnett from Unchained Capital and on YouTube has a pretty solid explanation.

27
00:01:54,195 --> 00:01:58,895
What does this mean? Well, weak miners have mostly finished shutting off the

28
00:01:58,895 --> 00:02:01,535
energy-hungry machines used to mine Bitcoin.

29
00:02:01,535 --> 00:02:07,555
In my view, once these miner capitulations occur and then end,

30
00:02:07,775 --> 00:02:10,455
they are incredibly bullish for bitcoin.

31
00:02:10,695 --> 00:02:16,635
The only natural seller of real spot bitcoin is miners.

32
00:02:16,915 --> 00:02:21,655
They are the only entities naturally selling billions of dollars worth of bitcoin

33
00:02:21,655 --> 00:02:24,755
every year to pay for their electricity expenses.

34
00:02:25,175 --> 00:02:29,555
The end of a miner capitulation has historically marked bottoms in the price

35
00:02:29,555 --> 00:02:30,815
of bitcoin. Bitcoin. Why?

36
00:02:31,235 --> 00:02:34,515
Miner capitulations are intense and real.

37
00:02:34,735 --> 00:02:40,115
This means Bitcoin ASICs plugged into hundreds of megawatts worth of power are

38
00:02:40,115 --> 00:02:41,655
actively being turned off.

39
00:02:41,875 --> 00:02:47,395
Just so you know, only 100 megawatts worth of power is roughly equal to 100,000

40
00:02:47,395 --> 00:02:49,735
homes no longer paying their power bill.

41
00:02:49,915 --> 00:02:55,195
And these miners that are actively turning off are the least efficient miners on the network.

42
00:02:55,455 --> 00:03:01,555
They're using the oldest Bitcoin ASICs and they have the most expensive electricity rates.

43
00:03:01,815 --> 00:03:06,075
These miners are effectively going out of business, defaulting on energy contracts,

44
00:03:06,435 --> 00:03:11,715
breaking land leases, and selling any spare Bitcoin they might have just to

45
00:03:11,715 --> 00:03:13,155
attempt to stay in business.

46
00:03:13,635 --> 00:03:18,655
At the end of these miner capitulations, only the strongest miners remain. main.

47
00:03:18,735 --> 00:03:23,575
And these are the miners that have less Bitcoin to sell on a daily or monthly

48
00:03:23,575 --> 00:03:28,255
basis because their expenses are less than the inefficient miners.

49
00:03:28,535 --> 00:03:30,315
As Joe puts it, I'll link to his video.

50
00:03:31,007 --> 00:03:32,787
It's a brutal event. I mean, it

51
00:03:32,787 --> 00:03:37,247
is sometimes the death of a business or sometimes the sale of a business.

52
00:03:37,967 --> 00:03:39,907
CleanSpark announced that they're buying Grid.

53
00:03:41,507 --> 00:03:45,547
So if you're familiar with, I think it's Harry Strutt or something,

54
00:03:45,667 --> 00:03:49,227
if you've seen him on some of the other podcasts out there, his company,

55
00:03:49,327 --> 00:03:52,967
Grid Infrastructure, is going to be owned now by CleanSpark.

56
00:03:53,047 --> 00:03:56,567
And at $155 million purchase of all stock.

57
00:03:57,387 --> 00:04:01,067
So you have these kind of actual business changing things happening.

58
00:04:01,147 --> 00:04:02,167
But why did it take this long?

59
00:04:02,687 --> 00:04:07,707
Why did it take 70 days? Why did it take almost more than double the time that it typically does?

60
00:04:08,407 --> 00:04:11,507
Well, I've got a hypothesis. And it goes something like this.

61
00:04:11,567 --> 00:04:13,207
And I'd like to know what you think of this.

62
00:04:13,687 --> 00:04:19,007
The ETF funds, of course, let's start there. They're buying Bitcoin OTC over

63
00:04:19,007 --> 00:04:22,747
the counter like crazy from the miners. They've built out relationships with the miners.

64
00:04:23,407 --> 00:04:27,727
And the miners are happy to sell around 70,000. right? They're making a nice, tidy profit.

65
00:04:28,287 --> 00:04:31,847
So that's obviously one of them. But I think the other thing that hasn't gotten

66
00:04:31,847 --> 00:04:36,847
as much attention but was different this having was ordinals.

67
00:04:37,627 --> 00:04:43,567
Ordinals gave miners a nice injection of fee profits. So it gave them more runway.

68
00:04:44,347 --> 00:04:47,147
I think that made a difference too, for better or for worse.

69
00:04:47,727 --> 00:04:51,127
It's really hard to measure this kind of stuff while you're inside the storm.

70
00:04:51,227 --> 00:04:54,607
But as the storm begins to clear, you start to get a better picture than once the storm's passed.

71
00:04:55,087 --> 00:04:57,707
You know, you can survey the damage, and I think that's kind of where we're

72
00:04:57,707 --> 00:05:00,327
at. The storm's clearing. We're not through it yet, I suspect.

73
00:05:01,247 --> 00:05:05,807
Bob Burnett, he's the founder and CEO at Barefoot Mining. This is what he said this week.

74
00:05:06,207 --> 00:05:12,507
When Bitcoin drops to $62,000, it means miners enter limbo and the first circle of Dante's hell.

75
00:05:13,067 --> 00:05:17,067
At $61,000, they descend another level into hell. The heat turns up,

76
00:05:17,087 --> 00:05:19,007
and the profuse sweating commences.

77
00:05:20,240 --> 00:05:25,220
At 60,000, they descend to a level three, and the mashing of teeth occurs.

78
00:05:25,500 --> 00:05:29,800
At 59,000, you'll hear them whimper and cry for mommy.

79
00:05:29,940 --> 00:05:35,540
At 58,000, they reach level five, and the stench you smell is their hair on fire.

80
00:05:35,800 --> 00:05:39,560
At 57, they reach level six, and their flesh begins to bubble.

81
00:05:39,700 --> 00:05:44,340
At 56,000, they plead for mercy, mercy killing, he says.

82
00:05:45,180 --> 00:05:49,620
And at 55, their flesh is turned black, and eerie silence ensues.

83
00:05:49,620 --> 00:05:53,420
At $54,000, they reach the full depths of hell and turn to ashes.

84
00:05:54,100 --> 00:05:57,820
So that's what he's trying to get to is even these, you know,

85
00:05:57,820 --> 00:06:02,840
couple thousand dollar price movements right now are just life and death for these miners.

86
00:06:03,260 --> 00:06:08,480
And Matt Kimmel from CoinShares, he kind of thinks we're probably in a standard cycle.

87
00:06:08,640 --> 00:06:11,900
He has this theory, kind of like I do, that we go through this every time.

88
00:06:11,960 --> 00:06:16,700
And he's talked about this before. And so miners are the laborers that are sort

89
00:06:16,700 --> 00:06:20,160
of adding transactions to the Bitcoin blockchain.

90
00:06:20,620 --> 00:06:24,540
And we're in the middle of a minor capitulation stage.

91
00:06:24,780 --> 00:06:30,600
And once we reach full capitulation amongst Bitcoin miners, the sort of excess

92
00:06:30,600 --> 00:06:34,740
supply that they have currently been releasing and selling into the Bitcoin

93
00:06:34,740 --> 00:06:36,960
market could soon dry up.

94
00:06:36,960 --> 00:06:43,720
And that means they could again begin sort of accumulating Bitcoin as they have done historically.

95
00:07:06,960 --> 00:07:09,580
Maybe it's a million dollar Bitcoin, but there might be a price point where

96
00:07:09,580 --> 00:07:12,200
you're actually willing to sell and take a little profit.

97
00:07:13,597 --> 00:07:19,337
But these government agencies or like the Mt. Gox stuff, that's not their angle at all with their stash.

98
00:07:19,477 --> 00:07:22,497
They're just going through a process, a legal process.

99
00:07:22,997 --> 00:07:26,597
And when they reach the end of that process, they're going to put them on the spot market.

100
00:07:27,317 --> 00:07:31,437
So you can kind of think of these Satoshis that these institutions own as kind

101
00:07:31,437 --> 00:07:32,717
of hanging over the market.

102
00:07:33,437 --> 00:07:38,057
Kind of like widow makers in the forest that could fall down and knock out a

103
00:07:38,057 --> 00:07:39,257
great bull run at any moment.

104
00:07:40,137 --> 00:07:44,157
So in a way, it's like Bitcoin's healing at the perfect time.

105
00:07:44,257 --> 00:07:45,537
The minor capitulation's happening.

106
00:07:45,957 --> 00:07:48,297
These government coins are getting dumped on the market.

107
00:07:48,977 --> 00:07:52,877
It's all kind of lining up really well and kind of tidy. You know,

108
00:07:52,877 --> 00:07:55,577
these Mt. Gox coins have been in bankruptcy process for 10 years.

109
00:07:57,157 --> 00:08:00,017
I would have been, I just didn't want to go through it.

110
00:08:00,737 --> 00:08:05,137
I estimate I lost somewhere between 15 and 30 Bitcoin, at least on Mt.

111
00:08:05,197 --> 00:08:06,357
Gox. It might have been more than that.

112
00:08:06,777 --> 00:08:09,397
But I just couldn't bring myself to go through the process.

113
00:08:10,077 --> 00:08:13,737
But beginning in July, they're going to start redistributing those coins back,

114
00:08:13,977 --> 00:08:19,697
Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash, back to the original owners that participated in this process.

115
00:08:20,777 --> 00:08:23,977
And when they do that, those owners will then have the choice to sell or not.

116
00:08:24,057 --> 00:08:26,317
We just don't really know. And it's going to kind of go between July and October.

117
00:08:26,637 --> 00:08:29,037
Some of them may choose to sell. Some of them may choose not to.

118
00:08:29,197 --> 00:08:31,357
I kind of suspect a lot of them are just going to keep hodling.

119
00:08:31,417 --> 00:08:36,077
Why not? So I don't think we're quite out of all of it yet, but things do seem

120
00:08:36,077 --> 00:08:39,417
to be moving right along and we do kind of seem to be on our way, at least.

121
00:08:40,560 --> 00:08:50,160
Music.

122
00:08:49,957 --> 00:08:52,137
Thanks for watching. Of course, that could always be taken out at its knees

123
00:08:52,137 --> 00:08:55,457
if the U.S. economy were to crash. And I want to make it clear,

124
00:08:55,537 --> 00:08:56,797
I think this really matters for Bitcoin.

125
00:08:57,397 --> 00:09:02,277
U.S. liquidity is driving the Bitcoin price performance and also driving the

126
00:09:02,277 --> 00:09:03,677
adoption of traditional finance.

127
00:09:04,197 --> 00:09:08,557
All of this is kind of like the next stage of Bitcoin scale and user adoption.

128
00:09:08,977 --> 00:09:13,117
And I think a good portion of it, from where I'm sitting, seems to be dramatically

129
00:09:13,117 --> 00:09:15,477
impacted by what happens in the U.S. right now.

130
00:09:15,877 --> 00:09:18,777
And so if the U.S. economy were to dramatically crash or slow,

131
00:09:18,977 --> 00:09:21,617
it's likely Bitcoin would dramatically crash or slow in terms of adoption,

132
00:09:21,817 --> 00:09:25,877
deployment, in both the sense of ownership and in the sense of like platforms.

133
00:09:26,797 --> 00:09:31,597
And we got some data today as I record. The first quarter GDP grew softer than

134
00:09:31,597 --> 00:09:37,097
expected at 1.4%. And if you dig into that 1.4% growth, you're likely going

135
00:09:37,097 --> 00:09:40,417
to find it's mostly military contractors and anybody related to the war in Ukraine.

136
00:09:41,756 --> 00:09:45,776
Thing is, when you look at the numbers for people, it's not so good.

137
00:09:47,316 --> 00:09:49,736
So consumer spending, which is the main driver of the economy,

138
00:09:49,896 --> 00:09:51,936
rose at the slowest rate in a year and a half.

139
00:09:52,576 --> 00:09:55,576
It's a big markdown. First numbers came out, looked okay.

140
00:09:56,216 --> 00:09:59,976
But then the second set of numbers that were revised came out and we saw a big

141
00:09:59,976 --> 00:10:02,836
markdown. Now, I want to put all this in perspective.

142
00:10:03,616 --> 00:10:05,756
We're not talking about anything that's just like next week,

143
00:10:05,836 --> 00:10:07,876
right? This is stuff that is slow moving.

144
00:10:08,016 --> 00:10:11,816
It takes a while for it to hit. It's stuff that is headwinds that are way out

145
00:10:11,816 --> 00:10:13,816
there right now, at least seemingly.

146
00:10:14,316 --> 00:10:17,956
But I watched this interview with this big money manager gal.

147
00:10:17,996 --> 00:10:21,236
She works for like private billionaires and she manages their wealth for them.

148
00:10:21,276 --> 00:10:23,916
And she does seem to know her stuff. I've seen her interviewed several times.

149
00:10:24,296 --> 00:10:27,656
And she thinks it's a lock that there's no crash at all this year,

150
00:10:27,736 --> 00:10:30,376
that we're probably going to have the Treasury step in.

151
00:10:30,436 --> 00:10:34,096
We're going to have the Fed step in. We're probably set to go for the rest of 2024.

152
00:10:34,476 --> 00:10:37,936
Well, we're not concerned about the market. Right. And Carl,

153
00:10:38,056 --> 00:10:41,136
we've talked about this every time I'm on. It's an election year.

154
00:10:41,316 --> 00:10:47,856
The Fed is pumping so much money into the system, far outweighing any impacts of tightening.

155
00:10:48,116 --> 00:10:49,956
And that's going to continue.

156
00:10:50,296 --> 00:10:54,776
You know, Yellen is an appointed position. The president has a lot of tools

157
00:10:54,776 --> 00:10:59,776
at his disposal to support the market and the economy so that a negative market

158
00:10:59,776 --> 00:11:03,656
or economy is not going to be something that's going to influence the reelection campaign.

159
00:11:03,656 --> 00:11:05,716
In a presidential year, right? Yeah, and a presidential year,

160
00:11:05,776 --> 00:11:08,416
which this is a double presidential re-election year.

161
00:11:08,616 --> 00:11:12,716
She just openly says the quiet part out loud, and that is that Jerome Powell

162
00:11:12,716 --> 00:11:16,776
and Janet Yellen are political players that respond to political pressure.

163
00:11:16,816 --> 00:11:20,896
And she's so confident she's going to bet her clients money on that.

164
00:11:21,036 --> 00:11:25,696
And then on top of that, she's going to go on CNBC television and state her

165
00:11:25,696 --> 00:11:28,896
reputation, which matters in this industry, on this.

166
00:11:29,536 --> 00:11:32,696
She's convinced they're political actors. And I think she's right.

167
00:11:32,696 --> 00:11:35,516
In part you could just see their internal logic.

168
00:11:36,310 --> 00:11:38,350
Well, they don't want to disrupt anything during the election,

169
00:11:38,510 --> 00:11:43,010
right? The best way to maintain the election is to just keep everything smooth in the economy.

170
00:11:43,370 --> 00:11:48,810
When in reality, what they're kind of implicitly not saying is things would

171
00:11:48,810 --> 00:11:53,890
be falling apart if we didn't step in, and that would be bad for the candidate,

172
00:11:54,070 --> 00:11:56,230
right? So that's what they're implicitly not saying.

173
00:11:56,370 --> 00:11:59,830
But you could see how they self-internalize it as well in order to keep things

174
00:11:59,830 --> 00:12:03,970
smooth, keep things humming along so people can focus on the election.

175
00:12:03,970 --> 00:12:08,230
And so the election can go fairly and smoothly, we're going to step in and make

176
00:12:08,230 --> 00:12:09,690
sure the economy doesn't have any bumps.

177
00:12:09,950 --> 00:12:13,510
So that a negative market or economy is not going to be something that's going

178
00:12:13,510 --> 00:12:15,210
to influence the re-election campaign.

179
00:12:15,430 --> 00:12:17,190
In a presidential year, right? Yeah, in a presidential year,

180
00:12:17,230 --> 00:12:19,870
which this is a double presidential re-election year.

181
00:12:19,990 --> 00:12:23,790
So we just think that this market is supported for the year.

182
00:12:23,850 --> 00:12:28,410
It doesn't mean we don't have concerns next year after the election.

183
00:12:28,570 --> 00:12:32,650
And it doesn't mean that we don't have concerns globally. globally and,

184
00:12:32,730 --> 00:12:34,830
you know, what does that mean for other asset classes.

185
00:12:35,070 --> 00:12:40,130
But we are confident that in the U.S. large cap space that the market will continue

186
00:12:40,130 --> 00:12:41,190
its run through the year.

187
00:12:41,290 --> 00:12:45,070
As the Fed is tightening in higher for longer rates, you're also focused on

188
00:12:45,070 --> 00:12:48,670
consumer spending and the changing patterns therein, looking at,

189
00:12:48,770 --> 00:12:55,870
you know, the increasingly prevalent pattern of the needs outcrowding the wants

190
00:12:55,870 --> 00:12:59,270
in terms of how consumers are thinking about what they're buying right now.

191
00:12:59,270 --> 00:13:03,150
Now, does that suggest to you that there are cracks forming in the economy that

192
00:13:03,150 --> 00:13:08,710
may not be as indicated by some of the data that we're conventionally watching?

193
00:13:08,730 --> 00:13:13,750
There are definitely cracks in the system, and I think those will come to play probably next year.

194
00:13:13,890 --> 00:13:18,630
But we're seeing a big dispersion between high-income households and low-income households.

195
00:13:18,830 --> 00:13:20,850
You notice she said this twice now, next year.

196
00:13:21,150 --> 00:13:25,570
Next year. Like, she's not quite saying what she expects, but she expects something

197
00:13:25,570 --> 00:13:27,430
bad to happen next year. We'll come back to that.

198
00:13:27,690 --> 00:13:31,610
She's about to talk about the dispersion between high income households and

199
00:13:31,610 --> 00:13:34,970
low income households and how high income households are hardly even feeling

200
00:13:34,970 --> 00:13:37,610
it. Low income households are really feeling the pinch.

201
00:13:38,651 --> 00:13:43,131
That's no doubt true. But I don't think it's as black and white as that, right?

202
00:13:43,211 --> 00:13:46,611
I think it's, there's also people that are kind of caught in the middle that

203
00:13:46,611 --> 00:13:49,551
maybe you're going on one less trip that year.

204
00:13:49,851 --> 00:13:52,851
You know, maybe you're not buying the good stuff at the grocery store anymore,

205
00:13:52,951 --> 00:13:54,571
but you're still doing grocery store trips.

206
00:13:55,051 --> 00:13:59,191
You know, you're cutting back in areas, but you're still buying in other areas.

207
00:13:59,291 --> 00:14:03,631
And I think that is probably happening across the board, even for the wealthy.

208
00:14:03,631 --> 00:14:08,311
You know, I have a conversation with a family member who's well off and they

209
00:14:08,311 --> 00:14:10,511
clearly are trying to make cuts as well.

210
00:14:10,791 --> 00:14:13,891
You know, they don't get rich by spending a bunch of money. So I don't necessarily

211
00:14:13,891 --> 00:14:15,271
agree with her next take completely.

212
00:14:15,631 --> 00:14:19,751
But if you were just going by the data, it does seem to indicate this is true.

213
00:14:19,871 --> 00:14:24,651
But we're seeing a big dispersion between high income households and low income households.

214
00:14:24,911 --> 00:14:29,311
We're seeing credit card debt tick up. We're seeing credit card delinquencies.

215
00:14:29,551 --> 00:14:33,271
And that's all in the lower income earners. You know, high income,

216
00:14:33,471 --> 00:14:37,151
they're continuing to spend on food and travel and experiences.

217
00:14:37,771 --> 00:14:43,991
And so there is this dispersion that we're seeing and that's going to have to come to play.

218
00:14:44,031 --> 00:14:48,891
I think once the government stops spending or stop spending as much,

219
00:14:49,031 --> 00:14:52,831
the tightening will take hold and that will play through the system.

220
00:14:52,891 --> 00:14:56,911
It's certainly going to be more of a delayed effect than we've seen thus far.

221
00:14:57,091 --> 00:15:01,511
This is why the people need Bitcoin. When I met my wife, the average house price

222
00:15:01,511 --> 00:15:05,671
in the United States was going for about 400 Bitcoin.

223
00:15:06,918 --> 00:15:11,118
Now, the price of houses has skyrocketed since then, because this was well before

224
00:15:11,118 --> 00:15:12,298
the pandemic and all of that.

225
00:15:13,198 --> 00:15:16,338
Now, depending on where you're shopping, it's four or five Bitcoin,

226
00:15:16,578 --> 00:15:19,618
sometimes seven Bitcoin, you know, here in the Pacific Northwest.

227
00:15:20,378 --> 00:15:26,618
But we go from hundreds of Bitcoin to just a couple of Bitcoin in a few years.

228
00:15:27,318 --> 00:15:29,998
While that very thing, that commodity or that whatever you want to call the

229
00:15:29,998 --> 00:15:31,658
house, is exploding in price.

230
00:15:32,378 --> 00:15:35,878
And people's credit card debt is exploding. The only thing that saves us from

231
00:15:35,878 --> 00:15:37,818
this is Bitcoin. People need Bitcoin.

232
00:15:38,198 --> 00:15:39,998
They're going to need to be able to take loans on their Bitcoin.

233
00:15:40,138 --> 00:15:41,358
They're going to need to spend their Bitcoin.

234
00:15:41,578 --> 00:15:44,498
They're going to need to be able to pay their taxes in Bitcoin because some

235
00:15:44,498 --> 00:15:48,318
of us sometimes just get our faces kicked in by the IRS.

236
00:15:49,238 --> 00:15:52,178
People need the solution. And if we zoom into the state level,

237
00:15:52,298 --> 00:15:56,458
the story gets even worse. California this week, for example,

238
00:15:56,638 --> 00:16:00,098
and I suspect this is true probably for some other states out there as well,

239
00:16:00,238 --> 00:16:02,478
has revised their job numbers.

240
00:16:02,938 --> 00:16:07,718
Now, we're looking at 2023 right now, but their gains in 2023 were initially

241
00:16:07,718 --> 00:16:09,178
reported as very substantial.

242
00:16:09,718 --> 00:16:13,578
But a recent report from the California Legislative Analyst Office,

243
00:16:13,718 --> 00:16:20,338
the LAO, reveals that all of the gains were illusionary. In fact,

244
00:16:20,418 --> 00:16:24,078
there was no net job growth for the whole year.

245
00:16:24,998 --> 00:16:30,518
California actually lost 32,000 jobs from September to December of 2023.

246
00:16:30,818 --> 00:16:39,138
For the entire year of 2023, California essentially saw no net job growth.

247
00:16:40,078 --> 00:16:46,818
Only 9,000 jobs added after all the revisions total for the whole state. Huge state.

248
00:16:47,778 --> 00:16:51,298
Huge state. Now, we don't have this number for 2024 yet, obviously,

249
00:16:51,318 --> 00:16:55,058
but what it shows us is there's two different systems at work here.

250
00:16:55,518 --> 00:16:59,098
There's the real-time employment counting system that we kind of go on month

251
00:16:59,098 --> 00:17:04,678
to month that has been completely broken at the state level and at the federal level.

252
00:17:04,698 --> 00:17:07,218
The federal numbers get revised every month as well, downward.

253
00:17:08,449 --> 00:17:13,909
There's a massive discrepancy between the early and the revised data every single time. It's a trend.

254
00:17:14,569 --> 00:17:18,969
And I think this situation in California probably reflects a broader issue in

255
00:17:18,969 --> 00:17:22,949
the U.S. labor market reporting system, suggesting we probably have inflated

256
00:17:22,949 --> 00:17:24,289
job growth figures nationwide.

257
00:17:25,289 --> 00:17:30,649
And we may discover around this time or maybe a little earlier in 2025 that

258
00:17:30,649 --> 00:17:32,129
the very same was true for 2024.

259
00:17:32,249 --> 00:17:36,729
In fact, would you be surprised at all if there was maybe a little more pressure

260
00:17:36,729 --> 00:17:40,849
during election year to have the numbers be juiced even more to make it just look a little better.

261
00:17:41,389 --> 00:17:43,669
And then you have the accounting office come back, oh, wait a minute,

262
00:17:43,789 --> 00:17:45,209
you triple counted here.

263
00:17:46,029 --> 00:17:49,949
So employment numbers matter because they've played a major role in the Fed's

264
00:17:49,949 --> 00:17:51,769
rate decisions since they started cutting.

265
00:17:52,529 --> 00:17:57,029
So they've been a huge factor, as well as the CPI and the core PCE numbers.

266
00:17:57,809 --> 00:18:02,429
And now we have ample evidence that shows us that all of these numbers are cooked.

267
00:18:02,429 --> 00:18:05,249
Cooked potentially the employment numbers we know they've been

268
00:18:05,249 --> 00:18:08,189
at least inaccurate consistently but they may be completely cooked

269
00:18:08,189 --> 00:18:11,069
if california is correct the cpi and.

270
00:18:11,069 --> 00:18:14,169
Core pce numbers are ridiculous i could

271
00:18:14,169 --> 00:18:18,269
do a whole episode on how ridiculous and completely unworthy they are of being

272
00:18:18,269 --> 00:18:22,889
cited by anyone let alone the federal reserve so we're working off all of this

273
00:18:22,889 --> 00:18:29,889
fake data it seems entirely possible to me that in 2025 the bottom could fall

274
00:18:29,889 --> 00:18:32,389
out of this thing so boost in and tell Tell me what you think.

275
00:18:32,829 --> 00:18:37,089
Do you think we could see the bottom drop out after the election or maybe they

276
00:18:37,089 --> 00:18:38,249
time the rates just right?

277
00:18:38,849 --> 00:18:41,489
They could paper over these issues for a little bit. What do you think?

278
00:18:42,069 --> 00:18:43,969
Does the Fed juice it just right?

279
00:18:44,009 --> 00:18:48,689
Hit the hit the veins of the market with them sweet rates and walk it down and

280
00:18:48,689 --> 00:18:50,969
the money starts flowing in and just papers over all this?

281
00:18:51,529 --> 00:18:53,549
Or does the bottom drop out after the election?

282
00:18:54,309 --> 00:18:57,869
Where does this go? Or, you know, the only thing that has been on my mind,

283
00:18:57,929 --> 00:18:59,829
and I'd love to know your insights on this as well, listener.

284
00:19:00,649 --> 00:19:04,489
Doesn't it feel like since COVID, every month we've been talking about a recession

285
00:19:04,489 --> 00:19:07,989
and it just doesn't arrive? It just doesn't show up.

286
00:19:08,649 --> 00:19:13,029
So maybe my take is wrong, but I look at this and I see we have all these fake

287
00:19:13,029 --> 00:19:15,289
numbers and now we have these employment revisions.

288
00:19:15,969 --> 00:19:20,589
We have this $35 trillion debt. It just doesn't seem sustainable.

289
00:19:21,229 --> 00:19:24,509
But the one thing they've been able to prove my whole life is they can kick

290
00:19:24,509 --> 00:19:27,129
that can much longer than I ever thought possible.

291
00:19:27,769 --> 00:19:30,009
So boost in, tell Tell me what you think.

292
00:19:30,960 --> 00:19:38,800
Music.

293
00:19:38,642 --> 00:19:42,602
All right, coming up next, my take on why we are in some of this mess to begin

294
00:19:42,602 --> 00:19:46,502
with, some important project updates big time, and your boosts.

295
00:19:46,502 --> 00:19:49,362
But first, I want to thank Podhome.fm.

296
00:19:49,402 --> 00:19:54,582
Go use my promo code TWIB and get three months free at Podhome.fm.

297
00:19:54,962 --> 00:20:00,182
The premier podcasting 2.0 hosting platform, my hosting platform of choice with

298
00:20:00,182 --> 00:20:03,022
unlimited shows and episodes powered by unlimited Podhome AI.

299
00:20:03,262 --> 00:20:06,182
Yeah, its tools will balance your audio and transcribe your podcast.

300
00:20:06,642 --> 00:20:11,082
It'll automatically create chapters and even suggest episode and title suggestions and all that.

301
00:20:11,342 --> 00:20:14,982
But you can go in and then curate it as well. The UI makes it really easy to do that.

302
00:20:15,062 --> 00:20:18,442
And Podhome has brilliant live streaming. If you'd like to do that,

303
00:20:18,482 --> 00:20:21,622
it supports value for value. If you want to take boosts and do value for value music.

304
00:20:22,742 --> 00:20:27,122
And it's fast. Podhome focuses on solving problems of come around publishing

305
00:20:27,122 --> 00:20:31,042
to just make it a pain after years.

306
00:20:31,162 --> 00:20:34,682
Podhome comes in and smooth Moves that stuff out. It's like you got a team in your back pocket.

307
00:20:34,882 --> 00:20:37,022
It's my hosting platform of choice.

308
00:20:37,442 --> 00:20:41,202
Go check it out. Unlimited shows, unlimited episodes with unlimited Podhome AI.

309
00:20:41,542 --> 00:20:47,142
Use the promo code TWIB and get three months for free. And go treat yourself

310
00:20:47,142 --> 00:20:49,362
right. Get yourself some features that make you stand out.

311
00:20:50,382 --> 00:20:53,662
That's the thing. The podcasting 2.0 stuff makes you stand out.

312
00:20:55,122 --> 00:20:58,842
And if you want to spend some sass on the Lightning Network and you use the

313
00:20:58,842 --> 00:21:03,102
Bitcoin company, You can use my promo code Jupiter to take a little bit off

314
00:21:03,102 --> 00:21:04,762
and it sends some sats towards the show.

315
00:21:05,142 --> 00:21:09,102
The Bitcoin Company on the app or on the web and use the promo code Jupiter

316
00:21:09,102 --> 00:21:13,162
and send some sats towards the show when you spend sats over the Lightning Network.

317
00:21:13,562 --> 00:21:16,362
It's pretty slick. It's one of my favorite ways to grab stuff,

318
00:21:16,502 --> 00:21:18,322
you know, if I was going to spend some sats.

319
00:21:18,742 --> 00:21:22,462
That's how I do it. The Bitcoin Company dot com and Pothome dot FM.

320
00:21:24,662 --> 00:21:28,742
Lazy Locks comes in with 10,000 sats. You're not going to believe this.

321
00:21:29,602 --> 00:21:32,842
I hate to say it, but you are our baller. That's the reality.

322
00:21:32,922 --> 00:21:36,002
You are our baller this week, so thank you, Lazy Locks. Oh, what?

323
00:21:36,482 --> 00:21:38,442
What, you want your clip?

324
00:21:38,942 --> 00:21:40,422
Fine. Here.

325
00:21:41,882 --> 00:21:46,222
You got your lobster. I kid. I really appreciate it, Lazy Locks.

326
00:21:46,242 --> 00:21:48,282
He says, time for another boost. You know what?

327
00:21:48,942 --> 00:21:52,842
You nailed that timing, didn't you? I think that might be the cheapest baller

328
00:21:52,842 --> 00:21:54,822
boost in the history of the show so far.

329
00:21:55,422 --> 00:21:59,262
Oppie 1984 comes in with 4,000 sats. Make it so.

330
00:21:59,722 --> 00:22:04,302
Symbol X is cool, though I have yet to get anyone to actually use it in my orbit,

331
00:22:04,402 --> 00:22:05,642
but I still love the idea.

332
00:22:06,182 --> 00:22:09,922
Another thing that you should look into is Meshtastic. It uses LoRa,

333
00:22:10,042 --> 00:22:14,982
or L-O-R-A standard, to create a local mesh network for basic text messaging.

334
00:22:15,842 --> 00:22:19,582
The boards are cheap and easy to set up, and if you want to expand your coverage,

335
00:22:19,642 --> 00:22:20,662
you can just connect to a node.

336
00:22:21,162 --> 00:22:24,122
You connect a node to MQTT, get it on the internet.

337
00:22:24,502 --> 00:22:26,962
It might not be the most practical thing for day-to-day messaging,

338
00:22:27,122 --> 00:22:31,482
but fun, low-cost, no-license radio hobby. like GRMS and amateur radio.

339
00:22:32,998 --> 00:22:36,418
Okay, so Appi, I've heard a couple of people mention Meshtastic to me.

340
00:22:36,518 --> 00:22:38,478
And so my question is, what's the range like?

341
00:22:39,138 --> 00:22:42,938
Could I be like 40 miles away and message the kids?

342
00:22:43,278 --> 00:22:47,958
Because there's kind of like this stretch on the I-5 corridor where the family's kind of spread out.

343
00:22:48,318 --> 00:22:51,538
And we're very prone to earthquakes and heck, even volcanoes.

344
00:22:52,058 --> 00:22:55,298
So I thought if there's ever a disaster, I'd really like something outside the

345
00:22:55,298 --> 00:22:58,378
cellular network, outside the data networks to get a hold of them.

346
00:22:59,138 --> 00:23:02,238
Maybe Meshtastic would be right for that. I honestly don't know.

347
00:23:02,238 --> 00:23:04,218
So if you have an opinion, please let me know.

348
00:23:04,838 --> 00:23:08,418
Jordan Bravo comes in with 5,555 sats.

349
00:23:08,458 --> 00:23:15,558
Maybe mining should be called unlocking Bitcoin because arguably all 21 million Bitcoin already exist.

350
00:23:16,338 --> 00:23:19,418
It's just that they haven't all been unlocked yet. Here's another idea.

351
00:23:19,698 --> 00:23:23,038
My wife suggested mining should be called something that relates to its function,

352
00:23:23,158 --> 00:23:24,818
such as verifying transactions.

353
00:23:25,678 --> 00:23:29,938
Those are all really good. Time releasing Bitcoin could be another one.

354
00:23:29,938 --> 00:23:33,678
One, verifying transactions I think I like the best, you know,

355
00:23:33,678 --> 00:23:37,098
because you could argue the Visa network and the MasterCard network and the

356
00:23:37,098 --> 00:23:40,758
banks take tons and tons of electricity that they're not public about,

357
00:23:40,898 --> 00:23:43,278
like Bitcoin is, to verify transactions.

358
00:23:44,158 --> 00:23:48,198
And so we already pay an enormous electrical cost for that. And it seems like

359
00:23:48,198 --> 00:23:49,458
everybody's OK with that. It's a good one.

360
00:23:49,998 --> 00:23:52,278
Jordan Bravo, you got a keeper there. Thank you for the boost.

361
00:23:52,618 --> 00:23:55,998
The golden dragon comes in with a classic row of ducks.

362
00:23:57,698 --> 00:24:01,178
Number go up. It seems to me that the number does go up when they're having

363
00:24:01,178 --> 00:24:02,378
in general market pressures.

364
00:24:02,938 --> 00:24:07,038
But for a hardware wallet, if you can get a Pi Zero, SeedSigner is amazing.

365
00:24:07,878 --> 00:24:11,418
You know, I really like the idea of SeedSigner. I have heard a couple of people

366
00:24:11,418 --> 00:24:13,618
articulate arguments against SeedSigner.

367
00:24:13,718 --> 00:24:18,358
So I have been particularly hoping somebody would boost in with an opinion on SeedSigner.

368
00:24:18,978 --> 00:24:21,698
And I think this is the second SeedSigner mention we've gotten.

369
00:24:21,718 --> 00:24:24,678
I'm still looking to collect information because I've heard that they're not

370
00:24:24,678 --> 00:24:27,878
maybe as secure as some of the other device options.

371
00:24:27,878 --> 00:24:32,598
But that could be fun and it's nice to be able to build your own and you know

372
00:24:32,598 --> 00:24:36,378
you could use something that doesn't look like a bitcoin wallet you know it

373
00:24:36,378 --> 00:24:39,558
just looks like a stupid raspberry pi or something I got plenty of those,

374
00:24:41,038 --> 00:24:44,278
just pull it out of the drawer look this guy's got a raspberry pi no big deal

375
00:24:44,278 --> 00:24:47,838
you know but you pull out something like a cold card or a trezor you know immediately

376
00:24:47,838 --> 00:24:48,978
oh this is a crypto wallet,

377
00:24:50,166 --> 00:24:53,626
So that's something to think about. Thank you.

378
00:24:53,986 --> 00:24:58,646
Appreciate it, Dragon. The tone record comes in with 3,333 cents.

379
00:24:58,806 --> 00:25:01,286
The traders love the vol. Great episode again, he says.

380
00:25:01,666 --> 00:25:05,386
Concerning the term mining as a point of confusion with the production activity,

381
00:25:05,706 --> 00:25:07,226
I found the following helpful.

382
00:25:07,686 --> 00:25:12,426
All 21 million Bitcoin already exist, but they are inaccessible and locked or

383
00:25:12,426 --> 00:25:16,286
frozen in time until future blocks are found and they're made available or unlocked

384
00:25:16,286 --> 00:25:18,166
from the block they reside within. in.

385
00:25:18,446 --> 00:25:20,586
So another pitch for unlocking Bitcoin.

386
00:25:22,146 --> 00:25:26,106
Yeah, I don't mind it. I think the only problem besides, so verifying transactions,

387
00:25:26,486 --> 00:25:28,326
you know, kind of makes sense. People get that.

388
00:25:28,746 --> 00:25:32,146
It's not as accurate. I think unlocking Bitcoin is probably more accurate.

389
00:25:32,626 --> 00:25:36,046
I do have an episode that gets into the Bitcoin time chain. If you're wondering

390
00:25:36,046 --> 00:25:38,446
what the heck we're talking about, go look at the back catalog.

391
00:25:39,006 --> 00:25:42,466
We dig into that. It's kind of a mind blower, but I think it's a great way to

392
00:25:42,466 --> 00:25:43,146
think about the blockchain.

393
00:25:43,986 --> 00:25:48,946
VCP comes in with 3,000 sats. That's not possible. Nothing can do that.

394
00:25:49,146 --> 00:25:51,986
It's obviously possible. He says your breakdown of the NVIDIA price pump and

395
00:25:51,986 --> 00:25:53,886
the Texas energy grid were so good.

396
00:25:54,186 --> 00:25:57,386
I'm going back to listen to the whole episode again. All signal, no noise.

397
00:25:58,126 --> 00:26:00,186
Thanks, VCP. I appreciate the

398
00:26:00,186 --> 00:26:03,746
return of value. It keeps this little thing going. Thank you very much.

399
00:26:04,346 --> 00:26:06,746
Gene Bean comes in with 2,048 sats.

400
00:26:07,666 --> 00:26:11,246
Hell no. No one other than my family is adjusting my thermostat.

401
00:26:11,406 --> 00:26:13,706
That's one reason I have I have a Z-Wave thermostat now. Yeah.

402
00:26:14,306 --> 00:26:17,166
Although you still haven't told me which Z-Wave thermostat, Gene Bean,

403
00:26:17,286 --> 00:26:18,466
because I really am looking.

404
00:26:18,926 --> 00:26:22,906
My Wi-Fi thermostat, which is some weird brand that you'll never find,

405
00:26:23,086 --> 00:26:25,306
just completely factory reset itself.

406
00:26:25,626 --> 00:26:28,426
And now it's no longer on the Wi-Fi. And I can't be bothered.

407
00:26:28,786 --> 00:26:32,446
Z-Wave would be preferable. But I'd asked you guys last week if you'd be down

408
00:26:32,446 --> 00:26:37,046
for the energy grid coming in and turning your AC essentially from,

409
00:26:37,106 --> 00:26:39,806
like, say, 72 degrees to 84 degrees.

410
00:26:40,266 --> 00:26:43,486
Gene Bean's the only one that took me up on the question, though.

411
00:26:43,486 --> 00:26:47,106
I guess the rest of you are all okay with it. That's the conclusion, obviously.

412
00:26:48,046 --> 00:26:52,206
Shout out to Gene Bean. Appreciate the thoughts.

413
00:26:52,586 --> 00:26:56,386
All right. Next boost comes from BHH32.

414
00:26:56,906 --> 00:26:57,846
I wonder if that stands.

415
00:26:58,446 --> 00:27:02,366
BHH32. I feel like I almost know what that stands for. With 5,000 sats.

416
00:27:06,505 --> 00:27:09,505
Oh, okay. He also has a thermostat response. I would never allow someone to

417
00:27:09,505 --> 00:27:12,825
install a thermostat or device in my home that can reach and dictate what goes on.

418
00:27:12,845 --> 00:27:16,285
This is beyond invasion of privacy and getting into the realm of dictatorship.

419
00:27:16,425 --> 00:27:19,125
My military service was for the land of the free.

420
00:27:19,745 --> 00:27:22,165
Free as in freedom. Not free as in beer.

421
00:27:23,165 --> 00:27:26,885
BHH, thank you. I appreciate you also jumping in on that. I was curious.

422
00:27:27,825 --> 00:27:32,525
You know, you never know, man. I live in Seattle. You never believe what people would be down with.

423
00:27:32,785 --> 00:27:36,025
Ace Ackerman comes in with, look, a double production. Look at that.

424
00:27:37,685 --> 00:27:41,825
And he says, value for value, episode 14. Thank you, Ace. Always good to hear

425
00:27:41,825 --> 00:27:43,065
from you. Appreciate it very much.

426
00:27:44,145 --> 00:27:47,305
DPG comes in with 3,333 sats.

427
00:27:48,065 --> 00:27:52,365
A pro tip for Americans looking to turn cash into Bitcoin. You can deposit up

428
00:27:52,365 --> 00:27:58,405
to $1,000 into the Cash app at many retailers like Kroger and Walgreens for a flat fee of $1.

429
00:27:58,585 --> 00:28:01,705
From there, you can swap to Bitcoin and even Lightning in-app.

430
00:28:02,185 --> 00:28:06,165
This is very KYC granted, but it sure beats those outrageous Bitcoin ATMs.

431
00:28:07,307 --> 00:28:11,587
I had no idea you could deposit into the Cash App at retailers like Kroger and

432
00:28:11,587 --> 00:28:15,027
Walgreens. I had no idea. That's really cool.

433
00:28:15,647 --> 00:28:20,127
I know Swan right now has like no fees on your first 10,000 Bitcoin.

434
00:28:21,007 --> 00:28:24,207
I don't know what, I guess 10,000 in USD. I'm not quite sure.

435
00:28:24,787 --> 00:28:26,347
So that's something to keep in mind too.

436
00:28:27,727 --> 00:28:30,947
I still think River is probably the way to go because it has lightning.

437
00:28:31,287 --> 00:28:34,427
Cash App has lightning too though. So the nice thing about Lightning is you

438
00:28:34,427 --> 00:28:37,307
can at least then peg into liquid, peg out really easily and cheap,

439
00:28:37,447 --> 00:28:40,067
and you can break some of that on-chain analysis.

440
00:28:40,187 --> 00:28:42,507
You won't break the fact that you KYC'd. They'll still have a record.

441
00:28:42,987 --> 00:28:45,967
So you're not getting away with anything other than people being able to track

442
00:28:45,967 --> 00:28:46,907
what you spend your money on.

443
00:28:47,147 --> 00:28:49,227
And the Lightning network lets you move it around real cheap.

444
00:28:49,307 --> 00:28:54,167
So if you do stack with a KYC app, just my advice is try to have the requirement

445
00:28:54,167 --> 00:28:57,647
that you have yourself Lightning at least.

446
00:28:58,247 --> 00:29:01,567
And then I think you'll be all right. Thank you, everybody, who did boost in.

447
00:29:02,267 --> 00:29:08,487
That's kind of it. We had 15 boosters, not a bad amount, but we only stacked 42,434 sats.

448
00:29:11,407 --> 00:29:13,627
It's kind of getting rough, and I think maybe people are just getting a little

449
00:29:13,627 --> 00:29:14,967
exhausted out there, and I understand.

450
00:29:15,527 --> 00:29:18,687
You know, it's a tricky thing, and to kind of make value for value sustainable,

451
00:29:19,067 --> 00:29:21,767
there's kind of a reciprocation on both ends, right?

452
00:29:21,927 --> 00:29:26,367
My proof of work here is the show, and then I hope that you validate that proof

453
00:29:26,367 --> 00:29:29,227
of work by boosting in and keeping things going.

454
00:29:29,887 --> 00:29:33,407
And I understand, you know, week after week, it does get tricky.

455
00:29:33,687 --> 00:29:37,967
But it is essential to the ongoing production. And if you'd like to boost in,

456
00:29:38,007 --> 00:29:39,107
just get a new podcast app.

457
00:29:39,247 --> 00:29:42,247
If you haven't tried out Fountain yet, it's one of the good ones at Podverse.

458
00:29:42,347 --> 00:29:43,967
It's open source and it's cross-platform.

459
00:29:44,347 --> 00:29:47,207
You can also boost from the Fountain FM website. You can just search for This

460
00:29:47,207 --> 00:29:51,167
Week in Bitcoin over there and then send it in right through the web.

461
00:29:51,247 --> 00:29:55,587
Even if you don't have the Fountain app, you actually don't have to switch, but you might want to.

462
00:29:56,427 --> 00:30:01,547
All right. So why are we in this mess we are in today? And so few people seem

463
00:30:01,547 --> 00:30:03,447
to have any kind of financial literacy.

464
00:30:04,087 --> 00:30:07,747
I mean, I've been trying to understand this as I talk about Bitcoin to other

465
00:30:07,747 --> 00:30:11,067
audiences that just seem to really struggle to understand.

466
00:30:12,501 --> 00:30:17,561
I think it really comes down to people don't really understand how broken the

467
00:30:17,561 --> 00:30:21,401
fiat system is until they start to look at something like Bitcoin that's done right.

468
00:30:22,001 --> 00:30:26,361
And so many people now have grown up within the system, trying to measure the

469
00:30:26,361 --> 00:30:29,001
system from within the system, and it's all they've ever known.

470
00:30:29,421 --> 00:30:33,101
And even our supposed experts are idiots.

471
00:30:33,761 --> 00:30:38,701
This is Yahoo Finance. And Yahoo Finance is one of the more respected online

472
00:30:38,701 --> 00:30:40,901
financial analyst firms.

473
00:30:40,901 --> 00:30:45,041
And their Yahoo Finance website is very popular and their lead anchor,

474
00:30:45,241 --> 00:30:52,081
who runs much of their most primetime television, seems to not understand the very basics of finance.

475
00:30:52,601 --> 00:30:57,101
You know, if you look at a world of full unpredictability, just once we have

476
00:30:57,101 --> 00:31:01,781
an unpredictability increasing, Bitcoin, I think it's a beacon of predictability

477
00:31:01,781 --> 00:31:04,521
in a world where you can predict anything pretty much.

478
00:31:04,781 --> 00:31:08,081
This is her guest from Swan, and she's about to jump in now.

479
00:31:08,161 --> 00:31:11,061
I don't think if you look at a price chart of Bitcoin, you would say it's a

480
00:31:11,061 --> 00:31:12,321
beacon of predictability.

481
00:31:12,701 --> 00:31:14,761
And 2% inflation means growth.

482
00:31:15,261 --> 00:31:18,901
Let's stop there before we get to the... If you look at the price chart of Bitcoin,

483
00:31:19,181 --> 00:31:21,041
I don't think it means a beacon of predictability.

484
00:31:21,221 --> 00:31:24,261
I don't think if you look at a price chart of Bitcoin, you would say it's a

485
00:31:24,261 --> 00:31:25,481
beacon of predictability.

486
00:31:25,721 --> 00:31:29,761
The first failure of somebody who's supposed to be a financial expert would

487
00:31:29,761 --> 00:31:33,801
be to look at the hourly price chart. You got to be an idiot.

488
00:31:34,321 --> 00:31:38,221
Maybe you look at the 200 moving average. Maybe you zoom out and look how it's

489
00:31:38,221 --> 00:31:39,461
performed over the last decade.

490
00:31:39,941 --> 00:31:43,681
You know, then you start to better understand the kind of returns you see from this asset.

491
00:31:43,961 --> 00:31:49,401
But more of a sin, a fundamental understanding is missing here.

492
00:31:49,861 --> 00:31:52,061
How does price go up without volatility?

493
00:31:52,921 --> 00:31:58,961
Somebody tell me that. And I'd like her to answer that. Number only go up if number also go down.

494
00:31:59,401 --> 00:32:01,841
That's how you shake things out. That's how you establish prices.

495
00:32:02,041 --> 00:32:05,821
This is the nature of any volatile asset in its infancy.

496
00:32:06,081 --> 00:32:10,341
Always has been, always will be if it's a fair market. The only time it doesn't

497
00:32:10,341 --> 00:32:13,041
work like this is when it's a manipulated market.

498
00:32:13,541 --> 00:32:18,681
And perhaps we're just so used to that that these supposed experts don't actually

499
00:32:18,681 --> 00:32:21,681
know what a free open market actually looks like for price discovery.

500
00:32:22,241 --> 00:32:25,541
Build, you know, in a world where you can predict anything pretty much.

501
00:32:25,721 --> 00:32:28,641
I don't think if you look at a price chart of Bitcoin, you would say it's a

502
00:32:28,641 --> 00:32:29,861
beacon of predictability.

503
00:32:30,201 --> 00:32:34,061
And 2% inflation means growth. So with growth comes inflation.

504
00:32:34,601 --> 00:32:39,401
Usually that's the way economics works. Although, yes, we've had very low inflation

505
00:32:39,401 --> 00:32:43,021
before this current regime, but I don't even know where to start here.

506
00:32:44,045 --> 00:32:46,945
The breath is literally taken away from me when I hear this.

507
00:32:47,165 --> 00:32:51,265
Usually we need 2% inflation for growth. The beacon of predictability.

508
00:32:51,645 --> 00:32:55,445
And 2% inflation means growth. So with growth comes inflation.

509
00:32:56,065 --> 00:33:00,705
Usually that's the way economics works. Although, yes, we've had very low inflation

510
00:33:00,705 --> 00:33:01,865
before this current regime.

511
00:33:02,045 --> 00:33:07,385
I'd invite you to go tell me anywhere where it's cited where that 2% inflation target comes from.

512
00:33:07,845 --> 00:33:11,045
It's just something that the banks have agreed on because it lets them quietly

513
00:33:11,045 --> 00:33:14,165
steal from you. A healthy market doesn't need inflation.

514
00:33:14,465 --> 00:33:17,285
This is Stockholm syndrome.

515
00:33:18,005 --> 00:33:20,565
And she's considered an expert. And she cuts the swan guy off.

516
00:33:20,605 --> 00:33:23,485
He never gets a chance to correct her. But this is Yahoo Finance.

517
00:33:24,045 --> 00:33:25,985
And they're considered one of the respectable ones.

518
00:33:26,565 --> 00:33:29,885
It's embarrassing. Their understanding is like inverse.

519
00:33:30,325 --> 00:33:35,125
They think volatility is bad for price discovery. And they think inflation is good.

520
00:33:36,285 --> 00:33:43,025
It's fiat education. And it's not just the news actors. it goes all the way

521
00:33:43,025 --> 00:33:47,185
to the people inside the Treasury and the FDIC and the Federal Reserve.

522
00:33:47,785 --> 00:33:50,685
They are all low quality thinkers.

523
00:33:51,405 --> 00:33:55,645
I'm going to go a little bit back in time here. So get in the Wayback Machine with me.

524
00:33:57,845 --> 00:34:02,445
We're going to 2009, my friends, just after the big 2008 collapse,

525
00:34:02,645 --> 00:34:07,005
the finance market was just wrecked. But more importantly, I think in the context

526
00:34:07,005 --> 00:34:09,665
of this clip, The housing market was also wrecked.

527
00:34:09,845 --> 00:34:16,165
And the FDIC chair at the time, and she's well-respected, you could kind of see the way she thinks.

528
00:34:16,225 --> 00:34:20,385
And the way they think is this sort of set-in-stone thing.

529
00:34:21,693 --> 00:34:25,013
Never going to change, the U.S. government will always be the reserve currency

530
00:34:25,013 --> 00:34:26,573
of the world kind of mindset.

531
00:34:26,753 --> 00:34:30,273
And so then they can act and plan based on that. And it's just without question.

532
00:34:30,373 --> 00:34:34,213
And this clip kind of demonstrates the way they think, which I think is low quality.

533
00:34:35,053 --> 00:34:39,833
FDIC Chairman Sheila Baer is a former treasury official and professor of finance

534
00:34:39,833 --> 00:34:43,793
who's written children's books on the wisdom of saving.

535
00:34:44,013 --> 00:34:47,853
Maybe some of the CEOs on Wall Street should Should have read the children's books. Maybe so.

536
00:34:49,253 --> 00:34:52,493
Maybe so. I already don't like her.

537
00:34:52,573 --> 00:34:58,693
I mean, it's so smug to assume that this bureaucrat is smarter than the CEOs on Wall Street.

538
00:34:58,873 --> 00:35:03,533
So much smarter that they should have read her children's book. That's how smart she is.

539
00:35:03,933 --> 00:35:07,393
Some of the CEOs on Wall Street should have read the children's books. Maybe so.

540
00:35:08,853 --> 00:35:15,273
Maybe so. Bear warned two years ago that bad mortgages threatened the financial system.

541
00:35:15,273 --> 00:35:19,993
Now she's managing the biggest bank failures in years, including the collapse

542
00:35:19,993 --> 00:35:25,173
of Washington Mutual and last summer's sudden failure of IndyMac in California.

543
00:35:25,173 --> 00:35:30,093
I like that these dramatic failures that are equivalent to like an absolute

544
00:35:30,093 --> 00:35:34,793
collapse are talked about like, well, she's on top of it. She's managing it.

545
00:35:35,193 --> 00:35:40,733
This destruction that's happening to middle class wealth and to jobs and entire

546
00:35:40,733 --> 00:35:45,253
companies and this inability to get your money. It's all being managed by this woman.

547
00:35:45,353 --> 00:35:48,573
She's on top of it. Don't worry about it. We were told we would get in.

548
00:35:48,733 --> 00:35:54,573
Stay open an extra hour. When IndyMac failed, you were watching these scenes

549
00:35:54,573 --> 00:35:58,973
on television of people lining up outside the bank like it was 1932.

550
00:35:59,213 --> 00:36:01,233
Yes, it was. It was amazing. What did you think of that?

551
00:36:01,493 --> 00:36:04,753
I think people just forgot that banks do fail and how the FDIC works.

552
00:36:05,133 --> 00:36:08,573
Their money was safe. It was probably the safest place in the world to have

553
00:36:08,573 --> 00:36:11,173
your money because we were an operating institution at that point.

554
00:36:11,393 --> 00:36:13,173
What sort of hit was that on your balance sheet?

555
00:36:13,473 --> 00:36:17,313
I think we ended up to, it was over $9 billion for a $33 billion,

556
00:36:17,473 --> 00:36:20,093
yes, it was very stiff. The question becomes.

557
00:36:21,180 --> 00:36:26,000
How many times can the FDIC do that? At what point is the FDIC broke?

558
00:36:26,140 --> 00:36:29,120
The FDIC is backed by the full faith and credit of the United States government.

559
00:36:29,320 --> 00:36:32,260
So if we need to, we try not to and don't want to, but if we need to,

560
00:36:32,300 --> 00:36:36,960
we can borrow from Treasury to make up for any shortfall. So the FDIC never goes broke?

561
00:36:37,180 --> 00:36:39,960
We don't go broke. No, we are the government. We're backed by the full faith

562
00:36:39,960 --> 00:36:41,100
and credit of the United States government.

563
00:36:41,300 --> 00:36:46,720
Oh, I'm sorry to say, unfortunately, the FDIC seems to be broke.

564
00:36:46,720 --> 00:36:52,060
Now, fast forward back to current time, and Carl Lewis has a fantastic thread

565
00:36:52,060 --> 00:36:55,360
that I'll link you to in the show notes, and he writes, although the designated

566
00:36:55,360 --> 00:37:00,140
reserves managed by the FDIC were intended to be at least 2% of actual,

567
00:37:00,360 --> 00:37:07,300
or I'm sorry, although were intended to be at least 2%, actual was closer to 1%, he writes.

568
00:37:07,300 --> 00:37:14,160
In other words, the FDIC only has 1.15% of its total insured deposits in reserves.

569
00:37:14,460 --> 00:37:16,660
So since I botched that a little bit, I'll just make it clear.

570
00:37:16,900 --> 00:37:24,860
Right now, at the end of June in 2024, the FDIC only has 1.15% of total insured

571
00:37:24,860 --> 00:37:26,120
deposits in its reserves.

572
00:37:26,120 --> 00:37:33,800
If other banks, he goes on to write, have similar FDIC insured ratios as the top 30 banks,

573
00:37:33,940 --> 00:37:41,460
then there are at least up to $16 trillion of deposits not insured or having any reserves.

574
00:37:41,820 --> 00:37:45,380
It's like the money doesn't exist and isn't backed by anything.

575
00:37:45,700 --> 00:37:50,980
Quote, what is the money would be the greatest question of the century if we

576
00:37:50,980 --> 00:37:52,220
were to have a major banking crisis.

577
00:37:52,680 --> 00:37:54,940
The thread has charts and data.

578
00:37:55,060 --> 00:37:57,440
I mean, it's great. That's just one of the many things it touches on.

579
00:37:57,820 --> 00:38:01,800
So in 2009, she said it three times, the FDIC could never go broke.

580
00:38:02,120 --> 00:38:08,460
In 2004, well, the full faith and credit of the U.S. government is $35 trillion in debt.

581
00:38:08,700 --> 00:38:13,400
And the FDIC has 1.15% of total insured deposits and reserves.

582
00:38:14,240 --> 00:38:18,240
Doesn't seem like that's a great position to be in. Again, again,

583
00:38:18,320 --> 00:38:22,920
I don't really necessarily even say this with any delight, but Bitcoin does fix this.

584
00:38:28,720 --> 00:38:32,580
Some important project updates I'd like you to know about. I love the Mutiny

585
00:38:32,580 --> 00:38:35,760
wallet, and it was a little unfortunate to see that they had to put out a PSA

586
00:38:35,760 --> 00:38:40,180
about some of the functionality of Fedements being degraded due to DNS issues.

587
00:38:40,360 --> 00:38:42,300
And they've been providing updates really reliable.

588
00:38:42,920 --> 00:38:45,320
I do think some people have been having trouble getting their funds.

589
00:38:45,680 --> 00:38:48,460
You know, the Fedements system is still kind of new. It's rough.

590
00:38:48,580 --> 00:38:50,820
It's one of the reasons why I haven't really talked about it much on the show.

591
00:38:50,820 --> 00:38:56,420
So I am very hopeful and I remain just a pretty happy liquid user for this type

592
00:38:56,420 --> 00:39:02,380
of task, but I would love to replace liquid one day with a Fetament and something I could trust.

593
00:39:03,020 --> 00:39:05,300
It just seems like some of the stuff needs to be worked out.

594
00:39:05,360 --> 00:39:07,860
So if you've used this functionality of Mutiny Wallet, I'd love to hear from you.

595
00:39:08,505 --> 00:39:10,845
Really encourage you to check the links in the show notes because there are

596
00:39:10,845 --> 00:39:13,005
some steps you might be able to follow to get funds out.

597
00:39:13,565 --> 00:39:16,545
It does seem like maybe some folks lost some money. I'm not sure.

598
00:39:17,185 --> 00:39:20,205
Not a great situation, but it is early days there.

599
00:39:20,285 --> 00:39:23,385
The Mutiny Wallet remains really great, and the team was really on top of this,

600
00:39:23,505 --> 00:39:27,065
disabling functionality that would get people in trouble and kind of cleaning

601
00:39:27,065 --> 00:39:28,565
things up as fast as they could.

602
00:39:29,345 --> 00:39:34,305
So that was really good to see. And then there's a really good bit of news for

603
00:39:34,305 --> 00:39:38,605
the UK this week. Strike has launched in the UK following their European rollout.

604
00:39:39,085 --> 00:39:43,725
Strike's a really solid Bitcoin-only app, and it's a good tight team that's

605
00:39:43,725 --> 00:39:46,565
working on making the experience the best possible.

606
00:39:46,845 --> 00:39:49,805
Strike also integrates with Fountain to make boosts really easy.

607
00:39:49,945 --> 00:39:54,325
And Strike's on the Lightning Network with, I think, free withdrawals too,

608
00:39:54,525 --> 00:40:00,245
on-chain or Lightning, which is a great deal, especially during high transaction fees.

609
00:40:00,685 --> 00:40:03,965
So Strikes really focused, they're really honed in on Bitcoin and Lightning

610
00:40:03,965 --> 00:40:07,165
and trying to give you a good wallet and something you can purchase your sats

611
00:40:07,165 --> 00:40:10,945
with and then send it around wherever you want. And it's so fantastic to see it come to the UK.

612
00:40:11,565 --> 00:40:14,225
I think this is one of those apps that's a little misunderstood in our community.

613
00:40:14,445 --> 00:40:18,865
And I think people should give it a second look because it's pretty good. All right.

614
00:40:19,965 --> 00:40:21,665
Are we ready for our final clip of the week?

615
00:40:24,105 --> 00:40:28,325
Bitcoiners should always be thinking with a long time, time preference, right? Right.

616
00:40:28,605 --> 00:40:32,965
Thinking for the like 30 years out, you want your health to be good. Right.

617
00:40:33,425 --> 00:40:36,385
You want your family to be good. You want to be planning to be able to get access

618
00:40:36,385 --> 00:40:37,385
to your generational wealth.

619
00:40:37,985 --> 00:40:41,225
And you need to take care and note of your information diet,

620
00:40:41,345 --> 00:40:43,645
which I think is a critical aspect to your mental health.

621
00:40:43,685 --> 00:40:47,025
But really how you think about the world and how you make decisions,

622
00:40:47,205 --> 00:40:51,325
how this stuff lands in your brain and it kind of soaks in and you kind of make

623
00:40:51,325 --> 00:40:54,465
your world decisions and views based off that information you take in.

624
00:40:54,985 --> 00:40:56,605
Something I think a lot about with this show.

625
00:40:57,496 --> 00:41:00,916
Try to make it high signal. And it's something Jack Dorsey and Lynn Alden were

626
00:41:00,916 --> 00:41:03,056
discussing recently at the also Freedom Forum.

627
00:41:03,596 --> 00:41:08,796
And Lynn asked Jack on his thoughts on open source algorithms and how these

628
00:41:08,796 --> 00:41:12,176
closed black box algorithms could be impacting society.

629
00:41:12,376 --> 00:41:16,216
You'll recall Jack Dorsey, of course, former CEO of Twitter,

630
00:41:16,816 --> 00:41:18,416
probably has a little bit of insight here.

631
00:41:18,856 --> 00:41:22,156
This is going to sound a little bit crazy, but I think the free speech debate

632
00:41:22,156 --> 00:41:23,836
is a complete distraction right now.

633
00:41:24,356 --> 00:41:27,056
I think the real debate should be about free will.

634
00:41:27,776 --> 00:41:31,396
And we feel it right now, because we are being programmed.

635
00:41:31,856 --> 00:41:36,036
We're being programmed based on what we say we're interested in,

636
00:41:36,116 --> 00:41:41,636
and we are told through these discovery mechanisms what is interesting,

637
00:41:41,816 --> 00:41:45,216
and as we engage and interact with this content,

638
00:41:45,476 --> 00:41:48,436
the algorithm continues to build more and more of this bias.

639
00:41:48,656 --> 00:41:53,036
But the algorithm, even if it's open source, is effectively a black box.

640
00:41:53,036 --> 00:41:58,556
You cannot predict 100% of the time how it's going to work, what it's going to show you.

641
00:41:58,996 --> 00:42:04,036
And it can be moved and changed at any time. And because people become so dependent

642
00:42:04,036 --> 00:42:09,416
upon it, it's actually changing and impacting the agency we have, the free agency we have.

643
00:42:09,796 --> 00:42:14,436
And I think the only answer to this is not to work harder at open source in

644
00:42:14,436 --> 00:42:18,616
algorithms or making them more explainable about what they're doing and why

645
00:42:18,616 --> 00:42:20,676
they're doing it, but to give people choice.

646
00:42:20,676 --> 00:42:25,316
Give people choice of what algorithm they want to use from a party that they trust.

647
00:42:25,596 --> 00:42:30,216
Give people choice to build their own algorithm that they can plug in on top of these networks.

648
00:42:30,736 --> 00:42:36,356
And that's really the biggest problem and why these corporations became so large

649
00:42:36,356 --> 00:42:41,456
and so valuable is because they solved the discovery problem on the internet.

650
00:42:41,756 --> 00:42:43,616
We talk a lot about the public square.

651
00:42:44,676 --> 00:42:47,416
But the public square cannot be owned by one company.

652
00:42:48,359 --> 00:42:52,279
The public square, by default, is the internet. But the problem with the public

653
00:42:52,279 --> 00:42:57,219
square is it's very hard to discover and to be matched with the things that

654
00:42:57,219 --> 00:42:58,199
you're truly interested in.

655
00:42:58,439 --> 00:43:02,219
And that's where the value of a Google came in. It helps you discover.

656
00:43:02,439 --> 00:43:04,919
That's where the value of a Facebook, it helps you discover your friends.

657
00:43:05,139 --> 00:43:09,699
The value of a Twitter helps you discover news and interesting content of the day.

658
00:43:10,559 --> 00:43:13,999
But if we can solve the discovery problem in an open source way,

659
00:43:14,119 --> 00:43:16,719
in a free agency way, that you get to choose,

660
00:43:17,299 --> 00:43:21,259
how you see the world and what algorithms you're using and you know more or

661
00:43:21,259 --> 00:43:25,079
less how they're how they're working and that you can turn them off and see

662
00:43:25,079 --> 00:43:29,739
everything otherwise it really is attacking,

663
00:43:30,339 --> 00:43:35,659
free will it's it's programming how we think and we can resist it all we want

664
00:43:35,659 --> 00:43:42,199
but it knows us better than we know us because we tell it our preferences implicitly

665
00:43:42,199 --> 00:43:47,499
and explicitly all the time and it just It just feels super dangerous to continue

666
00:43:47,499 --> 00:43:49,359
to rely upon that without choice.

667
00:43:51,659 --> 00:43:54,999
That was actually a really great talk. It was The Power of Open Source,

668
00:43:55,059 --> 00:43:56,039
and I think it's under 30 minutes.

669
00:43:56,699 --> 00:43:59,739
So I'll link to the whole thing in the show notes if you'd like to watch it. I recommend it.

670
00:44:00,159 --> 00:44:03,259
I think he's absolutely right, and that's why I've gotten more and more serious

671
00:44:03,259 --> 00:44:07,419
about Noster. If you'd like to find my public key, it's chrislass.com. I have it over there.

672
00:44:07,819 --> 00:44:11,539
But the reason why I think about this is you can see it even with legacy media.

673
00:44:11,539 --> 00:44:16,699
You know, if you think about what the legacy media chooses to show you,

674
00:44:16,739 --> 00:44:19,539
it's kind of like they're running their own algorithm, if you will.

675
00:44:20,019 --> 00:44:24,059
And if you look up stats of Bitcoin acceptance and adoption,

676
00:44:24,379 --> 00:44:27,679
you'll notice it's really bad in the UK.

677
00:44:28,539 --> 00:44:34,219
Very unfavorable poll results, whereas, you know, 30, 40 percent favorable here in the States.

678
00:44:34,779 --> 00:44:39,759
And it's generally considered much less well-received when you do polling around

679
00:44:39,759 --> 00:44:41,839
Bitcoin and cryptocurrency in the UK.

680
00:44:42,519 --> 00:44:45,839
I've always wondered why that is, because they need Bitcoin just as badly,

681
00:44:45,839 --> 00:44:47,759
if not worse, than we do here in the States.

682
00:44:48,917 --> 00:44:52,897
And their inflation has been horrendous. And even years of horrendous inflation

683
00:44:52,897 --> 00:44:55,197
didn't shake them out of their opinion.

684
00:44:55,717 --> 00:44:58,017
Now, again, you'll have to go look these up online.

685
00:44:58,997 --> 00:45:05,477
But there's been surveys. And just recently, on June 19th, there was surveys

686
00:45:05,477 --> 00:45:09,217
conducted of the BBC's coverage of Bitcoin since 2013.

687
00:45:10,157 --> 00:45:16,497
And when you go back through it, what you realize is that with three or four

688
00:45:16,497 --> 00:45:23,977
exceptions, all of the BBC's coverage since 2020-2013 has been negative or neutral.

689
00:45:25,077 --> 00:45:28,317
Only like four stories or so have been positive since 2013.

690
00:45:29,157 --> 00:45:31,117
And you might be wondering, well, how many times did they cover it?

691
00:45:31,157 --> 00:45:35,437
A lot. This chart, I'll put a link in the show notes, it shows you. A lot.

692
00:45:36,517 --> 00:45:39,637
Starting on April 12th, 2013, their first story, which was neutral.

693
00:45:40,257 --> 00:45:44,237
But by 2014, 2015, they were getting pretty negative. And if you look at the

694
00:45:44,237 --> 00:45:48,677
last few years, really since May of 2020, all negative.

695
00:45:49,197 --> 00:45:54,277
But there's a lot of negative in between too. But it's just been consistently negative.

696
00:45:55,097 --> 00:45:59,017
And that's programming the population. And they're getting all warmed up over

697
00:45:59,017 --> 00:46:01,697
there with their CBDC too. They're going to be one of the first to get one.

698
00:46:01,857 --> 00:46:05,297
So they're all going to end up being crypto users. That's the irony of it.

699
00:46:06,097 --> 00:46:10,657
They're all going to end up being crypto users, even though when they're surveyed, they hate it.

700
00:46:10,757 --> 00:46:14,577
I just think that's so funny. And they're going to have the worst shit coin

701
00:46:14,577 --> 00:46:16,797
of them all, a CBDC, right?

702
00:46:17,697 --> 00:46:21,417
So, you know, I mean, there's an irony in that. I laugh at it, I guess.

703
00:46:21,477 --> 00:46:24,517
But I'll put a link to that in the show notes because I think that data is just

704
00:46:24,517 --> 00:46:28,537
absolutely fascinating when you analyze the coverage of the BBC.

705
00:46:28,957 --> 00:46:32,517
Like I mentioned, chrislast.com for that Noster public key.

706
00:46:33,077 --> 00:46:36,677
Links to what I talked about today are thisweekinbitcoin.show.

707
00:46:37,257 --> 00:46:40,517
This is episode 16, so you can find episode 16 over there.

708
00:46:40,877 --> 00:46:44,557
Get the transcript, get the chapters, get the links to what we talked about today.

709
00:46:44,557 --> 00:46:47,917
Day i sure would appreciate a boost or if you shared this show with somebody

710
00:46:47,917 --> 00:46:52,017
who might be a little bitcoin curious and if you have a podcasting 2.0 show

711
00:46:52,017 --> 00:46:55,677
that you love send it in i'm trying to build out the community i really i really

712
00:46:55,677 --> 00:46:58,817
want this to be like the bitcoin news podcast for podcasting 2.0 so i'm trying

713
00:46:58,817 --> 00:47:01,777
to do reaching out to like different podcasters and just saying hello,

714
00:47:02,577 --> 00:47:06,277
so if you've got a favorite show out there boost in the name of it or send it

715
00:47:06,277 --> 00:47:09,517
through my contact page so i can reach out and say hello to them and we're gonna

716
00:47:09,517 --> 00:47:12,637
we're gonna wrap it up with a value for Value song like I love to do.

717
00:47:12,677 --> 00:47:15,797
There's so many great ones these days.

718
00:47:17,200 --> 00:52:24,565
Music.
